My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-04-01 Windward Exh A Kelly Kagimoto Amend REZ 399
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-04-01 Windward Exh A Kelly Kagimoto Amend REZ 399
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2021 1:21:18 PM
Creation date
5/6/2021 1:21:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AU: Hi, Mr. Arai, long time no see. <br /> ARAI: Good morning. <br /> AU: Good morning, I hope you're doing well. <br /> ARAI: I have been, thank you. Likewise, hopefully you all have been well as well. <br /> AU: Question for you Mr. Arai, so I guess the concerns that were raised by the neighbors, I <br /> guess you mentioned that Ms. Kagimoto has addressed those questions and is Mr. Carvalho <br /> happy with it? <br /> ARAI: I would not say or represent that he is happy. I'm sure he is still concerned because I'm <br /> sure those concerns will not be resolved until such time the property is actually developed <br /> because you can only say and promise so many things right leading up to the actual development <br /> but, he is a very learned individual and he asked me a number of questions about my <br /> interpretation of code, and how certain things apply, and I tried my best to answer them. I think <br /> we arrived at where he understood what we were trying to accomplish on the property and how <br /> the applicant will be developing it in a very responsible manner and in compliance with <br /> regulations and at no point did he that I could remember where he actually challenged the <br /> validity or the accuracy of the information that I provided to him. He may not necessarily agree, <br /> but I don't think we thought that I was misinterpreting something. So, we left the conversation <br /> in very, very good terms which is why I was very pleased to speak to Mr. Carvalho but in the <br /> end, I hope we've addressed all his concerns. <br /> AU: Thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you Mr. Au. <br /> ROY: Raised hand. <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Roy? <br /> ROY: I just wanted to add that I also talked with Mr. Carvalho and while I didn't speak to him <br /> directly, he left a message after he spoke to Mr. Arai and said that Mr. Arai had addressed his <br /> concerns and that I didn't need to call him back. So, he seemed like after their conversation and <br /> of course you got the response letter he seemed satisfied with those responses from the applicant. <br /> So, I just wanted to say that he did leave a message and said that he was okay and understood the <br /> process and no longer had any major concerns and so that is it. <br /> ARAI: Raised his hand. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Mr. Arai? <br /> ARAI: I just wanted to disclose throughout this process we tried to be as upfront and transparent <br /> as possible in what was being presented to the Commission and the County. The applicant and I <br /> 5 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.