Laserfiche WebLink
realized the potential conflict of interest, he and the department decided to rescind the letter. He <br /> apologized for the oversight and said he would take full responsibility for it. <br /> Director Kern also informed the Commission of his request to the Board of Ethics ("BOE") for <br /> an informal advisory opinion. He said that he had just had his final hearing on April 12, 2021 <br /> and presented to the BOE the protocols that are currently in place. He described the protocols as <br /> follows: he has given his staff a list of his former clients; anything that comes in is reviewed <br /> against that list, and nothing that is listed comes to him but goes to Deputy Planning Director <br /> Darrow; the department's electronic filing system is controlled so that he has no access to any of <br /> his former projects; and he recuses himself from working with any of his former clients or <br /> employees for at least a year. He concluded his announcement by saying that the protocols have <br /> been working well where the deputy director handling a lot of land use matters and himself being <br /> focused more on operations process, such as the launch of EnerGov. He added that with that <br /> protocol in place, he should be able to avoid anything like the aforementioned mistake. <br /> Commissioner Van Pernis commented that his understanding was that if the head of a <br /> department has a conflict of interest, then the staff of that department is also disqualified from <br /> handling the matter; therefore, his request for the Commission to consider the potential conflict, <br /> concerned both the director and his staff. He asked if Director Kern had asked the BOE whether <br /> or not his staff, including the deputy director, could deal with those matters. Director Kern <br /> responded that in his presentation to the BOE, he had explicitly stated that anything that he <br /> would be in conflict with would be taken over by the deputy director who would then basically <br /> act as the director in those cases, with which the BOE concurred as the appropriate thing to do. <br /> Chairman Vitousek cautioned against having extended discussion on the matter, as Director Kern <br /> was just making an announcement; however, this matter would be placed on a future agenda for <br /> discussion once a written report was issued by the BOE. Director Kern said that he was <br /> expecting the BOE opinion in writing, which he would submit to the Commission as soon as <br /> possible. <br /> Chairman Vitousek called upon Deputy Corporation Counsel Jean Campbell to make her <br /> announcement. <br /> Ms. Campbell introduced herself and said that she represents the Planning Department, the <br /> Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission ("PONC"), and <br /> other departments and boards. She said that she had made a petition to the BOE for its guidance <br /> and appeared before them on April 12, 2021. She said that there are two pending matters before <br /> the county, which involve property that she owns in her personal estate planning trust: One is a <br /> subdivision application being handled by the Planning Department and the other an application <br /> to the PONC. She stated with respect to the subdivision application, which had been filed last <br /> summer, that she and Corporation Counsel Elizabeth Strance had discussed the potential conflict <br /> during her interview process in January of this year and agreed that although it was unlikely for <br /> that approval process to come to their office, if it did, she would be screened from it and another <br /> attorney would handle any legal matters relating to her subdivision process. Regarding the other <br /> pending matter, she said that she had not been aware that the application had been filed with the <br /> PONC until about a week before she started to work in the Office of the Corporation Counsel. <br /> She stated that she and Corporation Counsel Strance agreed, and the BOE recommended, that <br /> while all the decision-making power regarding PONC recommendations is with the PONC itself <br /> 4 <br /> Leeward Planning Commission <br /> April 15,2021,Meeting Minutes <br />