2021-04-15 Leeward Exh C (USE 21-086)

Home

that's a great way. I just don't want to add any hindrance to a property as let's say again being objective here that a guest stays 7 nights if there is according to the owner's perspective of their own property if they would want someone to travel mauka and let's say head to Kailua town from Kalaoa. That they would be going not against traffic but just easy into that lane. My only thought is I'll leave it up to the discretion of the owner in this case. We are looking at a multiple property situation or a subdivision at this time we are looking at what would basically interpret as a household on its own with the attendance of 6 guests. And I feel comfortable with as the motion was made but I'm willing to listen to more communications if there is a direct concern. I don't see it my thought is by having that hindrance it may unduly put a burden upon the property itself. I think anybody going to a property such as a B & B in Kalaoa is definitely going to listen to the directions given by the owner which has been stated by them several times in this application process that it will access through Leimomi. Thank you. VITOUSEK: I think that one of the things we are looking at here is the fact that the State Department of Transportation has put some pretty stringent requirements on the use of access to Mamalahoa as a condition for accessing the bed and breakfast off of Mamalahoa. Those conditions are at the point where the applicant is now saying I don't know if I can swing those improvements that are necessary in order to use access on the Mamalahoa and rather they would prefer to direct the access onto Leimomi. In the case that were suggesting where if there was an instance that hey, they got to get up and they got to use the mauka access technically they would have to have completed the improvements that are requested by DOT prior to allowing the bed and breakfast guests to use that so it kind of put us in a situation where we have a hard time enforcing those requirements if we are allowing it to happen both ways and not ensuring that the improvements had been completed. So, if the applicant is now saying that they do not necessarily intend to complete the requirements suggested by DOT for improvement of Mamalahoa, the access to Mamalahoa Highway but instead they are going to use Leimomi Street. I think memorializing that here and allowing them to use the access that they are provided will eliminate any future issues about inadvertent use of the other highway without the required improvements from DOT. NEWBERG: Raised his hand. VAN PERNIS: Raised his hand. VITOUSEK: Commissioner Newberg? NEWBERG: I do appreciate that final attachment with the State's requirements and suggested improvements. Mrs. Koizumi, are you open to having an amendment on this motion that would include all traffic of guests attending your bed and breakfast access through Leimomi exclusively? KOIZUMI-DROGE: Just to clarify. It's just the guests and not closing all access for residents? NEWBERG: As I understand it Mike is that how you are seeing this, they have an existing- 19 EXHIBIT C