My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-04-15 Leeward Exh C (USE 21-086)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-04-15 Leeward Exh C (USE 21-086)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2021 2:39:20 PM
Creation date
5/21/2021 2:39:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Commissioner Van Pernis did that addressed both questions? <br /> VAN PERNIS: I think there's one another question. <br /> CAMERO: Yes, there is, sorry, I just wanted to make sure if you had questions on that. Okay, <br /> so the last question that I have by Commissioner Mark Van Pernis is, did Planning look into how <br /> many STVR applications for properties in the area were turned down? If known, how many? <br /> So, again with the STVR applications out of the ones that were submitted we did reject one and <br /> we did deny one and I didn't look into the details as far as why we rejected them or why we in <br /> fact denied them. But I'm not too sure, I don't want to speak and say maybe it was in the post 76 <br /> lots but, those are what I found so far. <br /> VAN PERNIS: There was one more question, at the bottom of the list. Can you answer that <br /> please? <br /> CAMERO: Okay, I apologize. There is actually 2 questions on here that were scratched out. <br /> Do you want me to, you just want me to answer the last one that's scratched out right? <br /> VAN PERNIS: The last one, beginning with the word did. <br /> CAMERO: Okay, so, the question by Commissioner Mark Van Pernis. Did Planning look into <br /> or did the applicant submit anything regarding the effect of this applied for a project would have <br /> on the congested 2 lane Mamalahoa Highway, both northeastern and southwestern lanes? If so, <br /> what information does Planning have? The applicant did not submit, she did not submit <br /> something regarding the effect that this applied application was going to have on Mamalahoa <br /> Highway. Some of the things she was able to address was that most of the traffic would possibly <br /> occur when it wasn't the most congested times on Mamalahoa Highway. <br /> VAN PERNIS: May I ask, how Planning knows that most activities would not occur during the <br /> rush hour traffic jam on Mamalahoa? <br /> CAMERO: So, for Ms. Koizumi, she had just said that the check in times for the guests would <br /> be between 3:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. and that's assuming that those weren't going to conflict with <br /> the congested times on Mamalahoa Highway. <br /> VAN PERNIS: So, no independent investigation was made by the County? They took Ms. <br /> Koizumi's word for it. <br /> CAMERO: Yes, they did and also for this bed and breakfast application we weren't requiring <br /> her to do a traffic analysis as it seemed like it would be less than the fifty (50)trips per day for <br /> the proposed use. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, are there any other questions from any other Commissioners for the <br /> Planning Department staff? <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.