Laserfiche WebLink
have enforcement provisions or enforcement actions. The Federally approved program builds in <br /> a component called monitoring enforcement where they look at patterns of non-compliance. For <br /> example, if the Planning Commission or County Planning Department repetitively approves <br /> shoreline structures that should not be approved the State my step in and question <br /> administratively. Mr. Nakagawa stated that sometimes calls are received from the public on <br /> SMA permits issued and enforcement action is not started as there is no enforcement provision. <br /> Instead, they work with the County to get information, ask questions and it is exceedingly rare a <br /> situation would need some type of action to be taken. Commissioner Au appreciated the <br /> comments made to his question. Mr. Nakagawa also expressed his appreciation for the <br /> Commissioners time and the opportunity to provide a broad overview of the CZM Program and <br /> SMA and Shoreline Setback. <br /> This hearing item ended at 11:31 a.m. [SEE ATTACHED POWERPOINT PRESENTATION <br /> EXHIBIT Q <br /> The Commission took this item up at 11:31 a.m. <br /> The Planning Department staff Alex Roy and Maija Jackson did a presentation on the Coastal <br /> Zone Management and SMA permitting and shoreline permitting process from the County of <br /> Hawai`i's perspective. <br /> Ms. Jackson answered Commissioner Au's previous question concerning enforcement and who <br /> regulates enforcement. She stated for our County the statutes says that the Commission is <br /> supposed to enforce the SMA law. But, in Hawaii County the way our rules are written the <br /> Planning Commissions had given the delegated authority to the Planning Director to enforce the <br /> SMA area. So, he issues a notice of violations if there are complaints for the SMA area and the <br /> Director also has the authority to enforce violations within the shoreline setback area. <br /> During the presentation by Mr. Roy, Commissioner Replogle asked a question on coastal <br /> ecosystems. He asked if the CZM permitting can do anything about a coastal property that is <br /> being destroyed by use but there is no development. Mr. Roy replied once it passes makai of the <br /> shoreline that the two agencies of DLNR the Dept. of Aquatic Resources (DAR) and Office of <br /> Conservation and Coastal Lands (OCCL) manages all the submerged lands out to 3 miles. So, <br /> any impacts to coral reefs and submerged lands would be their focus and you would have to go <br /> through the regulatory process of OCCL and possibly Board of Land and Natural Resources <br /> (BLNR) and Department of Health (DOH) for water quality. He also stated it is the Planning <br /> Department and the Commissioner's jobs to ensure development does not add to those impacts <br /> and if it is out into the water the hope is that DLNR would provide some protection. Mr. Roy <br /> replied if that answered his question or not. <br /> Commissioner Replogle replied somewhat but his question actually was geared to the land that is <br /> there now and not specifically out on the reef but, the human activity taken place on open space <br /> that is destroying it. An example given was the Department of Hawaiian Homelands (DHHL) at <br /> Kalae where all kinds of ATV activity and other activities occurs, and the place is being <br /> trashed. Mr. Roy replied unmanaged lands, coastal lands is an issue when we don't have a nexus <br /> to impart conditional protection or preservation or mitigation. He was unable to give a direct <br /> answer and stated maybe the County can look into how to manage lands that are undeveloped but <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> Windward Planning Commission <br /> May 6,2021 Minutes <br />