My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-04-26 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-04-26 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2021 4:10:40 PM
Creation date
6/4/2021 1:53:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board April 26, 2021 <br />CHR. CABANAS: Any other questions for the director? Okay. If not, Mr.Director Brilhante, <br />thank you so much. <br />MR. BRILHANTE: Thank you very much. May I say one thing <br />CHR. CABANAS: Sure. <br />MR. BRILHANTE: before I leave? <br />CHR. CABANAS: Yeah, please do. <br />MR. BRILHANTE: It's in regards a topic that you guys will be discussing later and I just <br />wanted to give my two cents. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Okay. <br />MR. BRILHANTE: Provide some information. When it comes to the annual review of my <br />position Fm—I totally accept that. It's totally understandable. I understandI fully support <br />why it's being done. <br />The only information I'll put up there is when it comes to HR, one of the things we do is we're <br />one of the few departments in the County who's completely driven by the HRS. And there's <br />rules, there's requirements, and there's procedures codified in the HRS as it comes to—as it <br />relates to hiring, and classification and pay, and benefits—and things to that effect. <br />And, oftentimes, I don't like to consider myself the police but I have to act in that capacity. And <br />so, some there's departments, 99 percent of the time departments are very receptive to the <br />information I provide to them. But there's always that .001 percent that, for whatever reason, <br />they just don't get it. And I'mI run across that situation and so, in the past, when I look at the <br />responses to some of the questions, although names are not associated to department heads or <br />departments that are not associated with the responsesI can figure out why, where, who, <br />how—and I see that the departments who push back the most, oftentimes, that negative <br />relationship is reflected in my rating. <br />So, I'm not sure that the ratings and the responses from the department though the <br />SurveyMonkey is the most adequate or fairest way to get information as to my job performance. <br />But I understand it may be the only way. <br />So, with that, I just wanted to put that on the table for food for thought, going forward. And <br />that's all I have. Thank you. <br />MS. MATHEWS: Gay Mathews. Thank you for that because I've actually had that same <br />question is—from your perspective, is our evaluation process effective? What are we missing? <br />What are—and you've looked at it before and you're in ajar. How would you do it differently? <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.