Laserfiche WebLink
VAN PERNIS: Now can you hear me? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> VAN PERNIS: Is there any possibility of changing the date of the June hearing so that you <br /> would not have a conflict? <br /> VITOUSEK: Possible, but in either case I think we should have a deputy, I mean an interim vice <br /> chair for the meeting, regardless of whether I'm there or not. So we can work that out with the <br /> date of the meeting—we can work that out offline and figure out if we can schedule it or <br /> schedule a special meeting. But I think for the purposes of coverage, we will need to have a vice <br /> chair. Any further discussion? I would, I put this item as item number 7, if it were elected, so it <br /> will be taken after the completion of all the other items. <br /> SCHLUETER: Excuse me, Chair. Dalilah Schlueter, Corporation Counsel. I just want to, while <br /> everyone is considering,just make sure that you are aware that the Hawaii Revised Statutes <br /> 92-7(d) does, as the Chair, allow for this,provided that no item shall be added to the agenda, if it <br /> is of reasonably major importance and action thereon by the board will affect a significant <br /> number of persons. So I just want to make sure you all know the standard just so that, while you <br /> are considering. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, any further discussion? (No audible response) okay, seeing none, let's take <br /> a vote. All those in favor? <br /> (Commissioners Carr Smith, Yates, DeFranco, and Newberg, and Chairman Vitousek raise their <br /> hands in favor.) <br /> VITOUSEK: Aye. Any opposed? <br /> VAN PERNIS: (Raises hand in opposition) <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, motion carries—is that six to one? <br /> JACKSON: I believe it's five to one. <br /> VITOUSEK: Five to one, five to one, okay. Thank you. The item will be added as agenda <br /> item 7. <br /> Okay, next up is a clarification of agenda item 2. In a letter dated May 18, 2021, the applicant's <br /> representative for agenda item 2, Jekaterina Mysinforgive me if I pronounced it wrong <br /> SMA 21-078, requested to postpone until the June meeting to give the public time to review and <br /> comment on changes to the development plans and to allow the applicant additional time to <br /> follow up on concerns expressed by community members. This application has not been <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />