My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-05-20 Leeward Exh B (Public Testimony re SMA 21-078)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-05-20 Leeward Exh B (Public Testimony re SMA 21-078)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2021 11:38:56 AM
Creation date
6/17/2021 11:38:51 AM
Metadata
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Let me, let me see if we can find those. Sorry. <br /> VAN PERNIS: It's A through F. There is no boundaries within the question there's only the <br /> first question. <br /> VITUOSEK: I— <br /> SCHLUETER: Chair,just for a point. There is no motion on the table at the moment, so should <br /> not be having substantive discussion or questions on the matter. <br /> VAN PERNIS: This is a question for the testifier. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, question for the testifier. [Mr. Darrow raises his hand.] Deputy Director <br /> Darrow? <br /> DARROW: Yeah, I believe that Commissioner Van Pernis' questions are to the intervenor or <br /> the testifier in the matter of the hearing. At this point, Mr. Smith is testifying as a member of the <br /> public. If he has specific questions, he could ask them in relation, but as far as his detailed <br /> questions for the hearing, we should, I would request that we wait until the hearing continues and <br /> then we're able to get into the depth of the questions. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Commissioner Van Pernis, are there any questions. I agree that your <br /> questions that have been stated are applying to the agenda item, and if there are any questions on <br /> the information that was portrayed by Mr. Smith, any clarifications that are needed on his <br /> presentation, you can ask that, but don't make it the substantive questions based on material from <br /> our packet needs to wait until we're, we're in open discussion on this. Are there any questions <br /> about the, the substance of his presentation? <br /> VAN PERNIS: Mr. Smith testified that there was a contiguous boundary with the subject <br /> property, so I believe I'm entitled to ask at least the first couple of questions of this testifier. Of <br /> course, I'll follow the Chair's direction, but the written testimony and Mr. Smith's testimony <br /> indicates it may be a boundary dispute. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Okay, I will ask, I'll ask one of the questions here. <br /> VAN PERNIS: I think only the first question has to be asked. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep. Yep, okay. Let's see. It says, "if there is a boundary or survey dispute to the <br /> boundaries or surveys of Ala Kala property and the Mysin property, how much land area, such as <br /> square footage, is involved in the dispute? <br /> SMITH: Is that directed to me? Smith? <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. Yes. <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.