My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-05-26 EMC Minutes draft
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
2021-06-23 - CANCELED
>
2021-05-26 EMC Minutes draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2021 1:11:00 PM
Creation date
6/17/2021 1:10:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
getting all the pounds that they need from that County. And then we are left behind with <br />minimum fundingfor electronic waste. We were expecting to get more than $250,000 for our <br />program, but because of COVID-19, it was cut back to $99,950, and this coming fiscal year it is <br />being cut again, down to $95,000. So we are having to manage the program with the limited <br />funds that we have. <br />Vehicle tires are one example of a product that put a lot of the burden on the distributor and <br />retailers. If someone buys a new tire, it is required that the retailer charge for the recycling of a <br />tire. It doesn’t matter if the customer leaves the tire behind or not. The intent is if a customer is <br />already paying for the tire, the customer would not be taking it back home and stockpiling or <br />dumping it. <br />Lead-acid battery recycling also seems to be doing well, but Mr. Hayducsko is always surprised <br />at household hazardous waste collection events byhow many lead acid batteries come in. Even <br />though the customer is being charged for those batteries. Also, there is legislation out there to <br />require that sales of oil of a certain quantity are assessed a fee to support oil recycling <br />programs. The County used to get funds from the state to support those programs. Currently, <br />we don’t get anything. We have been discussing that we should be getting some funds from the <br />State, but we have not been successful. <br /> <br />Two programs that should be discussed in further detail are the Hi-5 beverage container fee <br />and the Advanced Disposal Fee for glass recycling. When you buy a Hi-5 eligible container, you <br />are paying the 5 cents, which you can get back if you take it to a redemption center, but you are <br />also paying a penny for the administration – for the State portion of the program, and also for <br />the recyclers. The recyclers are being subsidized for providing a redemption center. As for the <br />ADF glass program, if you buy anything that is in glass other than a Hi-5 product – there is a fee <br />on that, to help support our program. The importer pays 1.5 cents per container to the State, <br />which administers funds to the counties in a grant program which pays out based on on-island <br />recycling. This fee has not increased in 27 years. There was legislation this year to increase that <br />fee to help support our program, and there is a need to increase that. As an example, the <br />money that we get from the State is paying for less than half of our program cost for recycling <br />and materials. At our transfer stations, we have the roll-out bins for container glass and to do <br />that program we are getting much less from the State to support that program. Unfortunately, <br />if we cannot find funds for next fiscal year starting July 1, we are going to start cutting back on <br />providing that service to our citizens. So you will see a cutback at our transfer stations where <br />some of the transfer stations that have glass collection will no longer have glass collection <br />because of our funding situation. <br /> <br />iii. Other product categories that could be considered <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.