My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-06-16 Leeward Exh B (Public Testimony re SMA 21-000078)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-06-16 Leeward Exh B (Public Testimony re SMA 21-000078)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2021 10:34:13 AM
Creation date
7/16/2021 10:34:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VITOUSEK: Thank you very much for your time. Are there any questions from the <br /> Commissioners? Seeing none, moving on to Katie Lopez, please state your name and the <br /> town you live in. <br /> LOPEZ: Aloha, my name is Katie Lopez, I'm from Kailua-Kona. Thank you for <br /> allowing me to be heard today. I'm speaking in opposition of the 5-story condo proposed <br /> at 75-6150 Alii Drive which boarders our Ala Ka La public beach access. I was born <br /> and raised in Kailua-Kona and I'm a homeowner within 500 feet of the proposed building <br /> and I am also a local business owner. I'm asking the Leeward Planning Commission to <br /> deny this SMA Use permit based on the original intention of the SMA zoning and the <br /> preservation of the scenic corridor. <br /> The first point I'd like to make is public beach access. The SMA requires adequate <br /> access to public owned and used beaches. We already have such a limited public beach <br /> access. Most of these areas do not offer safe entry into the ocean for families with young <br /> children, at high tide this is limited even further. The Ala Ka La public beach access is <br /> one of the only accessible beach access points remaining and it's commonly used by <br /> surfers, fisherman, and families. The amount of parking in a 6-unit, 22 bathrooms condo <br /> would require of a significantly impact the public access to this beach. The plans have <br /> already stated that they plan to commandeer the public parking and we can also assume <br /> that residents of this condo will also have guests absorbing even more of our public <br /> parking. This does not ensure the adequate access the public owned and used beaches <br /> which an SMA requires. There is also the issue of safety and the increase of parking and <br /> traffic along this area. This is also a passing zone, not that I agree with that but there are <br /> runners, bikers, families along this road, it is a passing area we're talking about excessive <br /> parking now. <br /> The second issue I'd like to address is cultural preservation of the Alii Drive Scenic <br /> Corridor whose values are based on a vision to preserve the historical and cultural design <br /> language of the village of Kailua to Keauhou Beach Road. The renderings of this 5-story <br /> modern condo both renderings including the most recent highly contradict the cultural <br /> surroundings. The structure will stand 3 stories higher than any of its neighbors <br /> bordering Alii Drive with the design that does not align with the Scenic Corridor and it <br /> would block the public's view of the ocean from Alii Drive. Any further development <br /> on the makai side of Alii Drive must be limited. As it is there are only few areas along <br /> the scenic corridor where you can actually view the ocean due to obstruction of"—". <br /> This 5-story condo will obstruct the public's ocean view from our scenic road and yet <br /> another area of Alii Drive. <br /> My next concern is the precedent that the Leeward Planning Commission will be setting <br /> if the proposed SMA Use permit is granted. Special Management Area zoning was <br /> established because there was a need to preserve this area and it was feared that if special <br /> zoning was not set in place, excessive development would continue. The SMA was <br /> 5 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.