Laserfiche WebLink
KERN: Thank you very much. Maybe this will help so I'd assume that the, excuse me, the <br /> motion would include the conditions and the revised conditions. And if you look at Condition <br /> 20, it should say "Should any of these conditions not be met or substantially complied with in <br /> timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate procedures to revoke the permit", and one of <br /> those things it encompasses is basically being compliant with County and State laws. So, they <br /> have to be a good character and a good applicant moving forward otherwise that provision does <br /> exist in there and that exists and pretty much every Special Permit or Use Permit that we have. <br /> So, I think that covers your intent um'— <br /> LIN: Okay, yeah, I think that sufficiently covers what my intent for that condition was. So, if <br /> that's the case then I withdraw my original motion and I revise it to a motion to, I move that the <br /> application for Special Permit, Docket No. 20-000220, be approved based on the Planning <br /> Director's recommendations and conditions, which shall be adopted. <br /> AU: And I second that as well. <br /> REPLOGLE: It's been moved and seconded, all those in favor say aye. <br /> AU: Actually Mr. Chair, I have a— <br /> HALL: Guy's discussion. <br /> AU: Discussion please. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, discussion. <br /> AU: Can I go, or Joe I saw — <br /> REPLOGLE: You may go, you may go Mr. Au,please. <br /> AU: Thank you, so I'm kind of conflicted with this motion. I'm looking at this application and <br /> this motion in two angles. Number one, for Mr. Sussman as a landowner and number two for the <br /> business aspect of it of the rental facility and the violations. As a landowner if I'm in the setback <br /> if my property is in the setback, I got to knock that thing down immediately as a landowner. <br /> And the same goes for a business owner, so, I'm a little bit disappointed that Mr. Sussman and <br /> the vacation rental didn't take care of this back in 2017. Why wait now? Whether it's going to <br /> be your private land, whether it's going to be the applicant's private home or rental its knock the <br /> thing down. Fill up the cesspools, I'm just a little bit disappointed in that but I do support the <br /> motion for the reasons that we need to keep things up to par. But that's just my thoughts and <br /> discussion. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you Mr. Au. Anyone else? Yes, Mr. Clarkson? <br /> 13 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />