Laserfiche WebLink
5źƭĭǒƭƭźƚƓʹ No discussion. <br /> <br />ƚƷĻʹ The minutes were approved as presented by voice vote. Ayes: 6 (Adams, Burns, Fulton, <br />Gaffney, McIntosh, Robinson); Nays 0; Absent 3 (Cardwell, Hoopii, Olson). Motion carried. <br /> <br />3. STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIR <br /> <br />Chair Adams hoped members are having a good summer. She appreciated the input she had <br />received from the public and wanted to continue to encourage participation, but also to have <br />the general practice of looking for solutions and being positive and constructive in the <br />comments that are made. We are all struggling to get done what we need to get done with the <br />resources available to us, and it helps if we can work together. <br /> <br />4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON ITEMS ON THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Sandra Demoruelle: -2(c) regarding the Pahala large <br />major changes to the project plans, going from a technology of open lagoons for disposal to <br />mechanized treatment alternatives with subsurface drip irrigation. This major change of plans <br />requires the mayor, who was the accepting authority, to consider whether a supplemental <br />assessment is needed, and to publish notice of that decision in The Environmental Notice of the <br />Office of Environmental Quality Control. Attached is a sample of the notice required by this <br />Page 5 the County has said the EPA is making a decision. But EPA has its own set of rules. They <br />are federal rules, and NEPA, the National Environmental Policy Act. And in my opinion and in <br />the opinion of many legal scholars, NEPA is not as strong as the Hawaii Environmental Policy <br />Act. This presents a golden opportunity to us all to do a new environmental assessment to <br />consider this drip alternative in the 25 acres of old growth macadamia orchard. Instead of <br />pulling up the 20-foot trees, we can just do drip underneath the ground and not have to disturb <br />the plants that are already there. So I see this as a golden opportunity to look at things again <br />with new eyes. So thank you for considering my concerns about the need for a new <br />environmental assessment or supplement of some sort, or at least notification of whether they <br />are going to do one or not. Thank you. <br /> <br />Jerome Warren-2(c), and this is <br />Report 4-1(B) on Page 6. The Nlehu sewer project deadline is 2023. Your <br />informational report said 2027 and this happened last month too. To get the truth, you must <br />look at the EPA website. There you will find the semi-annual update that the County submits to <br />the EPA. This report is not on the County website. This item is not signed by the Director. Please <br />boondoggle cost over again. I am in contact with the EPA and will answer any questions. Thank <br />you. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />