My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-28 EMC minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
2021-08-25
>
2021-07-28 EMC minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2021 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
8/13/2021 3:45:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Adams proposed possibly coming up with a survey questionnaire, with a little more <br />background to give to commissioners as homework to bring back for the next meeting. <br /> <br />Director Mansour appreciated the idea. He said he was reading through the Kona Community <br />Development Plan and one paragraph said, no permits unless all infrastructure is in the ground. <br />So that discussion must have been taking place over the last 10 or 20 years. It seemed like it <br />made it into our Code, but they modified it to say within 10 years after 1989, instead of just <br />indefinitely until we build out the service area. And we somehow dropped the ball and people <br />community facility district, and how do you get 50 percent plus one to agree? People are going <br />t from the get-go with one developer rather than <br />200 different people, you already solved it. This is the intent, but any feedback you can give to <br />shape our policy would be greatly appreciated. <br /> <br />Chair Adams said it might help people to have it laid out a little bit more in terms of, this is what <br />, these are the two or three questions we have, go do a little bit of sounding out or <br />thinking about your own district, and what that means, and then come back. <br /> <br />Director Mansour rephrased the question to be: Think of it as your district, how would you like <br />to provide wastewater services to your district. Some of the districts dont have any wastewater <br />treatment, so as individuals, think about for example, Puna district, I dont have any <br />wastewater treatment plants, the County is going to be doing a study about the feasibility of <br />putting a wastewater treatment plant. If not, then how is that going to shape up for the <br />district? Is it going to continue being on septic, or is it going to be individualized treatment- <br />based systems based on subdivisions or commercial? The standard thinking about how you <br />would like to see your district being serviced with that wastewater. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Gaffney said what we are talking about here is essentially a wastewater master plan <br />for the island. While he thinks its valuable that each commissioner provides inputs for our <br />districts, and what we think fits, there are so many more parameters to master planning. To <br />him, its something that ought to be on our wish list for the federal money that is likely coming <br />down for wastewater. The process would be to hire a consultant for the wastewater master <br />plan for the island. That consultancy would then involve all commissioners as well as <br />constituents in all our districts, and would be akin to the community development plans, which <br />were very well-attended processes in the last two rounds of which he was aware. Rather than <br />this being a project for the Department, this is a much larger project that involves DEM, <br />Planning, potentially Water Supply, and other agencies, and this a natural fit to the Mayors <br />desire to look at this island from a sustainability point of view. If we are master planning for <br />wastewater, that also involves the use of that water and its contributions to the recharging of <br />aquifers. Its important for the Department and the Council to look at master planning for <br />wastewater on this island. To his knowledge, this been done. There are a lot of technical <br />aspects that must be considered. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.