My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-07-28 EMC minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
2021-08-25
>
2021-07-28 EMC minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2021 3:45:42 PM
Creation date
8/13/2021 3:45:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Adams said DOH is supposed to be putting together the procedures and requirements. <br />This item is just to know where things stand, so that we know we are sending our recyclables to <br />people who can manage them properly. <br /> <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />a. Discussion on solid waste division funding needs and options. <br />Chair Adams opened by saying the Commission has given its advice on the challenge of how we <br />fund wastewater management, and now we will go to solid waste management. To start the <br />conversation off she began with her version of what she did with the Solid Waste Advisory <br />Commission, and thinking about he answer, but we did come up with <br />various ideas to kick off the discussion. <br /> <br />We are looking at a solid waste fund that has $38 million in it with landfill operation costing $27 <br />million. Where do revenues come from? The General Fund provides about 65 percent of that <br />solid waste revenue. There is no financial incentive to reduce waste generation. It has no <br />relation to how much waste residents generate. There is nothing dedicated to solid waste <br />management. <br /> <br />We get about 33 percent of the funding from tipping cover the costs. <br />Its free to residents. They dont see or feel a cost to waste management. And we go to the <br />2 <br />Council to schedule any increases. <br /> <br />The recycled program operates off grants, it covers about 2 percent of the budget. HI-5 is self- <br />sufficient. Non-HI-5 glass is covered by an advance deposit by the manufacturers, but it only <br />covers 50 percent of the cost of having to recycle the glass. Electronics is pitiful, she said. We <br />really need at least $250,000, and are now getting $85,000. One of the recommendations we <br />made in the solid waste plan is we need more electronics waste collection events around but, it <br />shrunk to one-third to stay within the budgets that are given. The money is controlled by the <br />State Department of Health and the Governor, so again, things get pulled out to cover issues <br />like COVID-19. Our need from a revenue standpoint is we need to cost-effectively reduce and <br />divert waste from landfill. Otherwise, we are paying for it. We need to reduce what goes into <br />the landfill. <br /> <br />As a result, education gets shorted. Education is our primary recommendation from the Solid <br />Waste Advisory Committee. We need to tell people how to reduce the generation of waste. <br />Other underfunded items include staffing, maintenance and ease of use improvements, studies <br />of financial and life cycle impacts, planning and auditing, and piloting and evaluating <br />alternatives. <br /> <br />CIP projects are paid with bonding, but that is still a loan. Even if budgets are approved, they <br />are subject to change based on need. And something that is not always recognized up front is <br />you also need staff to oversee project design and implementation, and a lot of things are not <br /> <br />2 <br /> Amended by Ordinance No. 2020-86; increases are determined by the Departments administrative rules. <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.