My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-08-25 EMC agenda item 5-b(1) - HB1316_TESTIMONY_EEP_02-09-21_
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
2021-08-25
>
References
>
2021-08-25 EMC agenda item 5-b(1) - HB1316_TESTIMONY_EEP_02-09-21_
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2021 3:53:14 PM
Creation date
8/17/2021 3:53:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As drafted, HB 1316 proposes complex criteria for these types of facilities that may unnecessarily hinder the ability of <br />their outputs to be utilized by product manufacturers to meet any compliance obligations. ACC supports necessary <br />regulations to ensure advanced recycling facilities meet important environmental or public health standards but we do <br />have concerns with the current language in HB 1316. <br />ACC is also concerned there is no clear estimate on the potential costs to manufacturers, retailers and ultimately <br />consumers to set up these separate systems, manage these programs, and comply with new reporting requirements. <br />These costs are likely to be significant. Gbroad definition of packaging, <br />already decimated by the COVID pandemic, is likely to see higher operating costs, new regulatory requirements, and <br />potentially lack of supply of appropriate packaging materials to serve their take-out customers. <br />HB 1316 grants new authority to the Department of Health (DOH) to impose fees on manufacturers but is vague on any <br />specific dollar amounts or if there is any cap on these fees. Also, the bill provides new rulemaking authority to DOH in <br />several areas but uses terms that are undefined or unclear. For example, DOH would be required to develop criteria to <br />determine whether covered products are reusable, recyclable or compostable. This section includes references to vague <br />science and provide clear certainty for the regulated community. <br />Finally, a recent report from the Plastics Source Reduction Working Group (Act 254) included a recommendation that <br />he study <br />should include a comprehensive legislation and literature review on the impacts of a possible EPR law for packaging in <br />3 <br />that have been pursuing parallel efforts to implement EPR. Given that HB 1316 would have significant impacts on <br />manufacturers, retailers, grocers, restaurants, agriculture, pharmaceutical makers, and others undertaking this study <br />wouldbe a prudent first step. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments. If you have any questions, please contact me at 916-448- <br />2581 or tim_shestek@americanchemistry.com. You may also contact our Hawaii-based representative Ross Yamasaki <br />at 808-531-4551 or ryamasaki@808cch.com <br /> <br />3 <br /> https://health.hawaii.gov/shwb/files/2021/01/Final-PSRWG-Report-to-Leg.pdf (page 9) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.