Laserfiche WebLink
concerning the owners who met with Mr. Fuke and the architect back in 2015. And expressed 8 <br /> items in that document that we would like to have considered and for the most part they're in the <br /> record with regard to the follow up documentation. But the reason I come today is, I want the <br /> Planning Commission to know that the Kaulana Project is right adjacent to the development, and <br /> we are very interested in being good neighbors to this project and we have 44 units that are there. <br /> I'm not representing the 44 units today, but there are 44 units there that will be subject to <br /> everything that goes on with the new construction, grading and excavating and all that sort of <br /> thing. <br /> So, our concern is this the concern of I have is mostly related to as the project is built and <br /> hopefully that the concerns that were brought in 2015 will still be abided by and that we can have <br /> communication back and forth with the developers as it goes on to make sure that they are. <br /> There's been some concern over the last three years about keeping the property up in terms of <br /> brush management and the feral ungulates and all that sort of stuff. So, we haven't really had <br /> any conversations with the developers because I think we couldn't get in touch with them for a <br /> while and there's been almost a 50%turnover of the condos since 2015. So, we kind of just <br /> wanted to shore all this up and make sure that we can have some sort of conversation as we go <br /> through. That's number one and then number two is there's a comment on Page 45 of the <br /> background, it's paragraph 5 of the memo that deals with keeping the property cleaned up, <br /> homeless, I guess trying to live on the property and in such. Because it's like a lot of brush there <br /> that people can hide in as well as the feral ungulates and I just want to say I hope we can have <br /> some more dialogue because we tried to contact the owners and had a hard time, and the brush <br /> was just not kept trim down and so hopefully we can start the conversation again now. <br /> And the third thing and this is the last thing that I have is there's 8 items on the concerns that are <br /> Exhibit J and the one that I wanted to bring to your attention, I didn't see really addressed. It <br /> said in the original documents it was going to be addressed by the Public Works and that's <br /> dealing with site drainage. There's a 25-foot well that's documented on there that was going to <br /> be brought to the attention of the Public Works and in the Public Works response I didn't see <br /> anything relating to that. So, I'll just let, I don't want to repeat what's already in the record for <br /> you. I know because you have a lot of things to go over, but, if you could just take a look at <br /> those 8 items and then if anybody has any questions, I'll be glad to answer. <br /> VITOUSEK: Thank you very much. <br /> The public testimony ended at 11:28 a.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> Melissa Dacayanan-Salvador <br /> Secretary to Boards and Commissions <br /> 2 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />