My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-06-22 KCDP Minutes Draft
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Kona Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2021
>
2021-06-22 KCDP Minutes Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2021 9:29:12 AM
Creation date
9/2/2021 9:29:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen stated that one of the reasons he decided to work with this <br /> committee is because of its affiliation with the County. Mr. Palacat-Nelsen wants to help form <br /> connections between nonprofits/NGOs and this affiliation since the community he came from had <br /> its voice suppressed for 180 years, during which their concerns never made it to the table. <br /> Chair Young noted differences between North and South Kona. Chair Young also acknowledged the <br /> hardships with COVID-19 and empathized with the frustrations that Committee Member Weber <br /> mentioned. <br /> Mr. Leasure introduced the community mapping image from the March 22, 2021 meeting that <br /> shows the main organizations AC members are involved with. Following the March meeting, <br /> committee members were asked to match specific actions to references drawn out of the CDP to <br /> view who was working within similar areas of implementation. While some information from <br /> committee members was provided, it was still difficult to identify specific connection points. Mr. <br /> Leasure presented the shared interests of committee members on a spreadsheet and explained <br /> how we were trying to utilize the information. The mapping exercise can be used to identify what <br /> types of support aid implementation. He encouraged the AC to think about and discuss the best <br /> way to work through the exercise. <br /> Committee Members were in agreement that working through the exercise during the current <br /> meeting would not be an ideal use of the group's time. Members requested additional time to go <br /> through the list and research any questions they may have. <br /> Mr. Leasure expressed that staff was open to meeting with AC members one-on-one to work <br /> through the exercise and members were also invited to email their input to staff. Chair Young <br /> confirmed that it was the preference of the committee to follow up on this activity outside of the <br /> meeting. Mr. Leasure and Ms. Mercado indicated that they would like to have everyone's input <br /> prior to the joint, island wide AC meeting in August. <br /> 2. Implementation Updates from Action Committee Members: <br /> a. Update on Kona Open Space Network Plan: Committee Member Kimura stated that AC <br /> members should have received the April 27th minutes from their meeting with Mayor Roth <br /> (linked below). Ms. Kimura said they were pleasantly surprised by the support of the Mayor and <br /> the Planning Department to continue their work. She stated that there were no financial <br /> hurdles, as the plan is already provided for in the budget. Ms. Kimura outlined the benefits of <br /> the Kona Open Space Network Plan and expressed her happiness about moving forward. Ms. <br /> Kimura stated that the Planning Department is responsible for moving the project forward. <br /> Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen stated his full support and congratulated Ms. Kimura. <br /> Communication No.2021-02, Minutes from the April 27,2021 Mayor's Meeting can be viewed and downloaded here: <br /> http://records.hawaiicountV.gov/WebIink/1/doc/111052/Pagel.aspx <br /> b. Discussion of the Ali'i Parkway: Chair Young confirmed that the investigatory subcomittee's <br /> report to the Planning Director was dated May 26, 2021. Chair Young referenced that his work <br /> with Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen regarding the Ali'i Parkway was in relation to an <br /> existing Capital Improvement Project (CIP) at the time. The investigatory subcommittee was <br /> trying to determine whether to preserve it on the list as a CIP item. Chair Young went on to <br /> clarify that their efforts were not to duplicate the original Ali'i Parkway project model, but <br /> rather to look at community interests, specifically Hawaiian interests, and those that may be <br /> impacted by the suggested Parkway. Chair Young requested that Mr. Palacat-Nelsen provide <br /> additional history about the Ali'i Parkway project. <br /> httys.llwww.ylanninQ.hawaiicountuQov/ kona(aïż½hawahcountuQov Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.