Laserfiche WebLink
Note that in Zoom Chat Committee Member Alos moved to keep the communication (the <br /> subcommittee reports) open for subsequent actions, and Committee Member McLaughlin <br /> agreed. This motion was not verbalized to the audience. <br /> Committee Member McLaughlin stated that the set of tasks defined for the subcommittee <br /> have been met and that future issues could be addressed in either a new subcommittee or <br /> smaller-scaled enquiries. Committee Member Sanborn questioned if the issue will be buried if <br /> the motion passes. Vice-Chair noted that the conditions around the intersection change <br /> continuously and suggested a new subcommittee be considered if significant changes occur in <br /> the future. <br /> After discussion concluded, Committee Member Sanborn called for the vote and the motion to <br /> accept the reports was passed with 6 aye votes, 1 nay vote. <br /> Vice-Chair Smith then motioned to close the subcommittee and Committee Member Licoan <br /> seconded. <br /> During discussion, Committee Member Sanborn raised the proposal to prepare an addendum <br /> to capture new information since the report was prepared. Committee Member McLaughlin <br /> suggested that the addendum should be presented to the full AC to be more efficient. <br /> Committee Member Alos agreed to prepare the addendum and present it during a future <br /> meeting. <br /> The motion to close the subcommittee passed with 6 aye votes, 1 no vote. <br /> (Approximately 5:35 p.m. several Committee Members noted their need to exit the meeting. In <br /> advance of their departure, the AC acted regarding Approval of Minutes (see results below). <br /> Subsequent to this action, Committee Members Alos, Anderson, Licoan, McLaughlin, and Sanborn <br /> exited the meeting.) <br /> 4. Action Committee Member Initiatives and Network Maps: Mr. Leasure presented a visual <br /> portrait of the AC members' network of community groups and projects with which they are <br /> involved. This network image was created on the on-line Kumu software and shows the type of <br /> community groups and specific projects linked to each AC member. Mr. Leasure noted further <br /> that the categorization of the types of community groups is a proposal to be reconciled with <br /> other CDP ACs so that they may be combined for an island-wide view, and he stated that the <br /> planning staff would like the committee members' suggestions on other information to include <br /> and ways to organize the data that would be useful to them in their effort to prioritize and <br /> implement CDP-related implementation actions. Planning staff indicated that instructions will <br /> be sent to AC members with the draft minutes on what steps AC members should take <br /> regarding completing the mapping exercise. <br /> The Kumu map for SK CDP AC connections to community groups and projects [Communication <br /> Number 2021-01] may be found and downloaded from the following website: Com .No. 2021- <br /> 01 SK CDP Mapping - Laserfiche WebLink (hawaiicounty.gov). <br /> httys.llwww.ylannin,-.hawaiicounty.,-ov/home southkohala(aïż½hawahcountuQov Page 4 <br />