Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Where would you think the place to put the condition to do an updated traffic <br /> study to determine whether the items a. and b. are necessary? <br /> MOOERS: I would think in 11 after the first statement, "Prior to issuance of a Certificate of <br /> Occupancy for the middle School," a revised traffic study would be done to determine the <br /> improvements required "meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works, at no <br /> cost to the County." <br /> VITOUSEK: Sure, I want to make sure that it's in there that we are determining whether or not <br /> these improvements are still necessary. So, "Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for <br /> the middle School, the applicant shall conduct an updated traffic study to determine if the <br /> following improvements are still necessary, and if so, the applicant shall provide the following <br /> improvements meeting with the Department of Public Works, at no cost—" <br /> MOOERS: Yeah, that's fine. <br /> VITOUSEK: Does that make sense? <br /> MOOERS: Yes. <br /> VITOUSEK: Do we do we have that recorded? I don't know if I can say that again exactly. <br /> KAY: We'll be able to catch it on the recording to make sure that we finalize the language, and <br /> then we'll run it past you as we get you the action letter. <br /> CAMERO: Yes, and I got it, Chair Vitousek, actually word for word, so. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, right on, would you please repeat that? <br /> CAMERO: Yeah, so, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the middle school, <br /> the applicant shall conduct an updated traffic study determine it, to determine if the following <br /> improvements are necessary, and meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works <br /> at no cost to the county. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. That would be my recommendation for amending the motion on the floor. <br /> Is there a second? <br /> DEFRANCO: (Raises hand to second the subsidiary motion) <br /> VITOUSEK: Second by Commissioner DeFranco. Should we take a roll, or is there a <br /> discussion? Is there any further discussion? (No audible response) Should we take a roll call <br /> vote? <br /> SCHLUETER: Yes,please. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, we'll do a roll call vote on the secondary motion. <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />