My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-08-19 Leeward Exh C (Amend USE 05-001)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-08-19 Leeward Exh C (Amend USE 05-001)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2021 1:45:13 PM
Creation date
9/17/2021 1:45:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOOERS: Not for this, no. The school owns some of the properties along that roadway, others <br /> are owned by private individuals. But that is not part of this proposal; it would not be used to <br /> access the gym. <br /> YATES: Okay, so the parking that you remember we, well, the last time we talked about the <br /> gymnasium and parking, so once you get that, you, you will have enough parking for people to <br /> attend when things might come up? <br /> MOOERS: The county code has requirements for parking, and all the party will be required to <br /> be on site, and we have plans that have been reviewed and approved that have the appropriate <br /> on-site parking. <br /> YATES: So you are confident that, I mean, and including the lady who lives on that street there <br /> that I mean I'm sure all the people around there have gotten notices as to what is going on—so <br /> you are confident that it will not affect, you know,people's living or coming home or et cetera. <br /> MOOERS: Correct. I think, you know, the vast majority of the use of the gym is going to be by <br /> our students during the day. You've got to realize Parker school is almost 50 years old, we've <br /> never had a gymnasium <br /> YATES: Right. <br /> MOOERS: Sporadically, we've had basketball teams and volleyball teams that would <br /> potentially have matches, but those were always held in county gyms. You know, we are talking <br /> about very few nights a year and the times of the matches would be at times when school is not <br /> in session. So the impact, we believe, will be rather minimal. <br /> YATES: Okay. <br /> MOOERS: So that's, that's why we've asked for the, you know, for the, you know, the deferral <br /> at this time is because we don't believe that the impacts—and Public Works has shared that <br /> opinion, and I think even Margaret Wille who has a priority agreement with the school, has <br /> agreed that it's a reasonable request and is not opposed to it. <br /> YATES: Okay. Thank you. <br /> MOOERS: You're welcome. <br /> VITOUSEK: Any other questions from commissioners? (No audible response) okay, I have, I <br /> have some questions. So just sort of to summarize briefly, we are, we are in a place where there <br /> is a requirement in the special use permit to do these off-site roadway improvements. And they <br /> have to be done under the current regulations from the current approvals before the gym or the <br /> middle school. This is a, my question is, is that a result of the settlement agreement or did that <br /> predate the settlement agreement that, with Margaret Wille. <br /> 6 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.