Laserfiche WebLink
respectfully suggest that instead of setting the next hearing on this issue for September that a <br /> little bit more time be given for the Commissioners to review the record because again it is quite <br /> comprehensive and lengthy. Several days of a contested case hearing, several days of actual <br /> Commission hearings, excuse me, so, may I suggest that if the Commission is going to set this <br /> for the hearing that maybe it be extended that hearing date and time be extended out a bit. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you Mr. Hong. Mr. Matsukawa? <br /> MATSUKAWA: Following what Mr. Hong had to say, I was wondering if your staff could <br /> work it out with the appellate court because the original record to my recollection was filed in a <br /> digital format that can be retrieved by everybody, but since the appellate court has closed the <br /> case we can't get access to it, unless we go eCourt Kokua and we have to pay I think five bucks <br /> to see it. But if somehow, they could make it available and then everybody can look at that as <br /> that was the record that was filed at the Intermediate Court of Appeals. I don't know how the <br /> procedure works but it would be helpful. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. <br /> HALL: Yes, the record will be made available because it will be part of the Board packet and <br /> therefore, it will be posted wherever that gets posted Jeff or Maija. <br /> MATSUKAWA: The digital format, the one that went to the ICA would be great. <br /> JACKSON: Yes, we post that on our website under the Planning applications, and then we will <br /> send a drop box link to the parties as well as the Commissioners. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. Regarding Mr. Hong's suggestion that we maybe not take this up in <br /> September. Any, Mr. Au? <br /> AU: I understand all the Commissioners here are volunteering and I appreciate Mr. Hong's <br /> comments, but this is what we signed up for, so, I think we should plug through and do it in <br /> September that's my opinion. <br /> REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Clarkson. <br /> CLARKSON: How many pages of documents are in the record that we are talking about here? <br /> REPLOLGE: Mr. Hong, do you know how many pages roughly? <br /> HONG: Well, no, I won't say too many probably we killed a lot of trees, but it is quite <br /> extensive. I'd say there were probably, easily tens of thousands of pages of documents including <br /> transcripts. <br /> CLARKSON: Yes, I'd just like to respond to Commissioner Au's suggestion that I personally <br /> will go on the record now in saying that I will not be able to review tens of thousands of pages of <br /> 13 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />