Laserfiche WebLink
GALIMBA: So, Commissioner Clarkson do you want to limit your motion to that specific <br /> topic? Which I think it would be very valid as you point out, we haven't heard since then where <br /> that came from, but it isn't in the record of the original case I believe. <br /> CLARKSON: Well, I'm sorry I'm remiss, I'm not prepared to list the specific topics that we <br /> should be limited to. I didn't think it would be required that if we opened it up to any new <br /> evidence that that would be a fairly broad category covering numerous items that were discussed <br /> in the opinion memorandum. If the rest of the Commission would like much more specificity <br /> then I'll have to ask for their patience and letting me go through and find all the findings and <br /> other decisions that Commission made that were deemed unsatisfactory by the Court. <br /> AU: Mr. Chair, I have my hand raised. <br /> REPLOGLE: Oh, I'm sorry Mr. Au, please go ahead. <br /> AU: I would still like to hear from our Honorable Chair on his opinion and I still want to hear <br /> from Commissioner Aguinaldo. But before you do that, I would like to respond to <br /> Commissioner Galimba's question to Commissioner Clarkson. If we open up the record I don't <br /> know what the consequences are going to be if we just limit it to one or two or three things. It's <br /> either we open it or we don't. That's my feeling Malia, Ms. Hall maybe you can interject on <br /> that, but I still want to hear from my fellow Commissioner Gilbert Aguinaldo and our Honorable <br /> Chair Replogle. <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Aguinaldo? <br /> AGUINALDO: I just think that based on what is being discussed, I just truly feel that we can <br /> proceed and in moving forward, but to an extent of again with our fellow Commissioners on that <br /> once you open the can, that's the thing right. If we have enough sufficient evidence to move <br /> forward let it be and if not, what is the limit count of the questions right, what are we going talk <br /> about. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Your Honorable Chairman thinks that we should stick with the record <br /> as it is. I think opening the record as been stated is opening it, it should either be opened or not <br /> opened. And the Court made its decision based on what was presented the first time and I don't <br /> know that we should be opening it back up again where it's been quite a few years and we're <br /> dealing with that time and space is the question. So, I don't believe we should open it back up to <br /> new testimony, I think we should go with what we have and make our decision. Mr. Lin? <br /> LIN: Chair, I'll like to call for question. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> LIN: So, I'd like to call for the vote on the motion that Mr. Clarkson presented. <br /> REPLOGLE: Alright. <br /> 7 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />