My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-09-09 Redistricting Commission minutes (2nd Session)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021-09-09 Redistricting Commission minutes (2nd Session)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2022 12:43:41 PM
Creation date
10/19/2021 12:35:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />LUI: Not the County? <br /> <br />NAKAMOTO: No. <br /> <br />LUI: Shoot. <br /> <br />MELLON-LACEY: I guess, you know, it comes down to this Commission’s decision— <br />what they want to do. I think that Ms. Nakamoto has worked diligently to try to frame <br />something that would possibly, if people feel that they could meet this timeline, enable us <br />to meet our deadline because of course, one always wants to try and meet one’s <br />deadlines. If this isn’t workable for the Commission, if the Commission thinks that this <br />would not be possible, then the Commission would need to come up with something that <br />they think would work for them. And, we would then need to make the Mayor and the <br />Council aware of it as a starting point because we would need to be working to get <br />something changed. As it stands right now, the County Charter requires it to be <br />completed by the end of –the year end. That’s where we sit right now, but this group has <br />to make a decision about what is realistic for them to be able to accomplish this and <br />accomplish it meaningfully. <br /> <br />BATH: So, you’re saying that we are bound to have the final plan with the Clerk by <br />December 31st based on the County Charter? So that’s not negotiable right now? <br /> <br />MELLON-LACEY: That is what the County Charter requires. <br /> <br />BATH: Okay. <br /> <br />LUI: But if it was changed at the State level, can it be changed at the County level as <br />well? <br /> <br />MELLON-LACEY: Well, that’s what I’m saying. This group has to make a <br />determination about what they think they can accomplish. So, Ms. Nakamoto worked <br />very diligently to try to draft something and keep you within the boundaries and you can <br />see that it’s quite ambitious. It requires a fair amount of effort, and you saw today, what <br />the software was like. I don’t know if any of you have yet to get on board with the <br />software, start to use it, get any idea of what it will take you. I think the staff has actually <br />looked at places where the nine meetings could actually be held in the various districts, <br />assuming that we would be able to go forward with in-person meetings in those locations. <br />And, that’s also in the Charter, requiring us to do that. So, I mean—yes, that’s what the <br />law says we should do. Of course, we got, you know, a very difficult task ahead of us <br />because we didn’t get the data until very, very recently and you’re just now being given <br />the opportunity to use this program. So, I’m saying, you know, this is what the law says, I <br />can’t tell you, you know, you have a task to do, and it be up to you to say, to figure out <br />what you think you can do and whether it’s doable in that timeframe for you or not. And, <br />I don’t know the answer to that for this group. You know what I’m saying? And if you <br />don’t think it is, then you need to come up with some kind of a plan because we would <br /> 42 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.