Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD BACKGROUND REPORT (SLU-20-054) Bhawai`i1s landCommunityDeve lopmentCorp oration(HICDC)SLU.10/5/2021 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HICDC) STATE LAND USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (SLU 20-000054) HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HICDC) has submitted an application for a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for approximately 9.09 acres of land. The property is located at 1450 Mohouli Street, directly west(mauka) of the Mohouli Senior Housing Project and the County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex, approximately 1,600 feet west from the Mohouli Street and Komohana Street intersection, Waidkea, South Hilo, Hawaii, TNM: (3) 2-4-001:168. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Applicants' Request: The applicant is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 9.09 acres of land, which is the future site of the Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. (Planning Department Exhibit 1 —State Land Use Boundary Amendment (15-acres or less) Application dated October 23,2020) 2. Objectives of the Requests: The applicant is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment to develop 90-units of affordable housing which aims to provide afforable housing and related services on a parcel in South Hilo, which were made available by the Govenor's Executive Order No. 4531. The applicant will be submitting an application to the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development to obtain exemptions from zoning code requirements, pursuant to HRS 201H-38 of the Hawaii Revised Statues which will need to be approved by County County via resolution for the Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. 3. Construction Timetable Construction of the proposed affordable housing project is anticipated to begin in early 2022 and be completed by the end of 2023. The completion of the full project will be dependent on funding availabiliy and is expected to be completed by 2024. The total cost of the proposed project is estimated at$30 to $40 million. -1- 4. Landowner: The landowner is the State of Hawaii. Effective April 7, 2017,the subject 9.091-acre property was set aside by Section 171-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes under the Govenor's Executive Order No. 4531 for the public purpose of elderly and/or affordable rental housing and related purposes, to be under the control and management of the County of Hawaii, identified as the Mohouli Heights Senior Housing Site. (Planning Department Exhibit 2—Governor's Executive Order No. 4531). The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation is the lessee of the land to implement the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5. Environmental Review: The use of County lands or funds requires compliance with Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes regarding Environmental Impact Statements. To comply with this requirement, a Final Environmental Assessment and Findings of No Significant Impact(FONSI) declaration (Planning Department Exhibit 3- FEA/FONSI) was published in the October 8, 2021 bulletin of the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development's Environmental Review Program. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 6. State Land Use Designation: Agricultural. 7. County Zoning: A-la. 8. General Plan LUPAG Map: Medium Density Urban. These are areas of village and neighborhood commercial and single-family and multiple-family residential (up to 35 units per acre) and related functions. 9. Hilo Community Development Plan (CDP): The Hilo CDP, adopted as Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975, identifies the property for agricultural purposes. 10. Special Management Area (SMA): The Special Management Area(SMA) is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program and regulated by the County. The project site is located over 1.4 miles from the shoreline and is not situated within the SMA. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES AND SURROUNDING AREA 11. Subject Property: The slightly trapezoidal shaped 9.09-acre subject property is located west from the Komohana Street and Mohouli Street intersection, at approximately 300- foot elevation above sea level gradually sloping downwards towards Komohana Street. The subject property is vacant and covered with vegetation. -2- 12. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Surrounding properties are zoned A-la, RM-4, RM-3, and RS-10. The adjacent single-family residential district includes the Sunrise Ridge Subdivision to the northeast which is zoned RS-10. The Sunrise Estates Subdivision is immediately north and west of the subject property on lands zoned A-Ia. The Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood is located adjacent to the subject property to the east. Further south across Mohouli Street is a 267-acre undeveloped property zoned A-la owned by the State of Hawaii. Properties to the east across Komohana Street and along Mohouli Street are zoned RS-10 and consist of single-family dwellings. Undeveloped lands further north were rezoned in 2004 to the Wailani Project District. 13. Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH): Unclassified. 14. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: "D" or"Poor." 15. U.S.D.A. Soil Survey: The property is classififed as Keaukaha Series, Keaukaha extremely rocky muck with 6 to 20 percent slopes (rKFD) and Pahoehoe lava flows (rLW) by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey, U.S. Soil Conservation Service 1973. The Keaukaha soil series consists of well- drained thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. The soil above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable but water runs rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. 16. Flood Zone: The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. 17. Flora/Fauna Resources: According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)in the 2021 Environmental Assessment, the federally threatened Newell's shearwater, Hawaiian petrel, Hawaiian hoary bat and the Hawaiian hawk have all been observed in the project vicinity. The USFWS stated that outdoor lighting can result in seabird disorientation, fallout and injury or mortality. There is no federally designated critical habitat located in the vicinity of the project. According to USFWS,potential impacts to seabirds can be minimized by: 1) shielding outdoor lights associated with the project, particularly when used during each year's peak fledging period(September 15 through December 15); 2) avoiding night-time construction; and 3)providing all project staff with information regarding seabird fallout. To avoid impacts to the endangered Hawaiian -3- hoary bat, woody plants suitable for bat roosting should not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (April to August). If this avoidance measure cannot be implemented, a bat survey should be conducted and, if this species is found, USFWS should be contacted for further assistance. 18. Archaeological/Historic/Cultural Resources: In a letter dated January 15, 2021,the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources-Historic Preservation Division accepted the Archaeological Assessment prepared by Haun (Haun 2008; Archaeological Assessment, Portion of TMK: (3)2-4-001:168, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i). The survey covered the subject property. No historic sites were found during the survey. There is no evidence of any traditional and customary Native Hawaiian rights being practiced on the site,nor existence of any known valued cultural, historical or native resources in the area. 19. Public Access: There is no known record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that traverse the property. 20. Traffic: AECOM completed a Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)for the project in November 2020 (Planning Department Exhibit 4 - TIAR). The TIAR analyzed the impacts of the proposed 90-unit housing development. The TIAR concluded that the proposed project will generate 48 a.m. peak hour trips and 68 p.m. peak hour trips and that the proposed driveways will operate at acceptable levels of service for all traffic movements during peak hours for a 5-year forecast. The TIAR also concluded that the traffic at the study intersections under the 5-year extrapolation will not be caused by the project, but by the expected increase in background traffic in the area. The applicant analyzed the impacts of the new, 90-unit affordable rental housing development on three (3) intersections: 1) Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place (project access at Mohouli Street); 2) Mohouli Street/Komohana Street; and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street. The TIAR recommended the implementation of a right-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street and restriping part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing full-movement access from Kupuna Place to the Hale Ola O Mohouli development by way of easement over TMK: 2-4- 001:176. The December 29, 2020 memo, from the Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends that the applicant will install streetlights and traffic control devises as may -4- be required by the DPW Traffic Division. According to the applicant, in 2013 the applicant contributed $500,000 to the Department of Public Works to install traffic signals for the intersection of Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street. 21. Waiakea Pond/Alenaio Stream/Waiakea Stream: The Waiakea Pond is the closest body of water to the proposed project area, situated downstream approximately 1 '/2 miles northeast from the subject property. The nearby Alenaio Stream is located approximately 1,500 feet to the north and the Waiakea Stream is located 3,000 feet to the south and downslope of the subject property. According to the Hale Ola O Mohouli FEA, the proposed project is not expected to have any direct impact on any streams, wetlands, aquifer resource or marine waters. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 22. Access: Access to the subject property is proposed from Kupuna Place by way of an easement over the adjacent parcel TMK: (3) 2-4-001:176 and Mohouli Street, both County roadways. Kupuna Place is a two-lane paved roadway with an existing pavement width of 32 feet within a 50 feet wide right-of-way. Mohouli Street is classified as a major collector road with an existing pavement width of 80 feet. 23. Water: County water is available to the property via a 12-inch waterline running within Mohouli Street and a 12-inch waterline running within Kupuna Place. Finally, the Department of Water Supply (DWS) indicated that the existing 12-inch waterline within Mohouli Street and Kupuna Place is adequate to provide the required 2,000 gallons per minute flow for fire protection, as per DWS Water System Standards. 24. Wastewater: The applicant will connect to the County sewer system, which is available along Kahikini Street in the adjacent subdivision to the north via easements along TMKs: (3) 2-4-001:176 and 2-4-001:177. 25. Solid Waste: The applicant indicated that the solid waste generated by the proposed project will be disposed at appropriate sites designated by the Department of Environmental Management. 26. Essential Utilities and Services: Electricity, cable and telephone are available to the site. Police, fire protection and emergency medical services are located in Hilo within two miles from the property. -5- AGENCIES' COMMENTS 27. Department of Public Works-Engineering Division (Planning Department Exhibit 5 —December 29, 2020 Memo). 28. Department of Water Supply (Planning Department Exhibit 6—December 30, 2020 Memo). 29. Department of Environmental Management (Planning Department Exhibit 7 — December 16, 2020 Memo). 30. Fire Department (Planning Department Exhibit 8 —December 16, 2020 Memo). 31. State Department of Health (Planning Department Exhibit 9—March 8, 2021 Memo). 32. State Department of Land and Natural Resources — State Historic Preservation Division (Planning Department Exhibit 10—January 15, 2021 Memo). 33. State Department of Land and Natural Resources —Division of Forestry and Wildlife (Planning Department Exhibit 11 —January 12, 2021 Memo). 34. State Department of Land and Natural Resources —Engineering Division (Planning Department Exhibit 12 —December 23, 2020 Memo). 35. State Department of Land and Natural Resources — Commission on Water Resource Management (Planning Department Exhibit 13 —January 7, 2021 Memo). 36. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Planning Department Exhibit 14 -December 23, 2020 Memo). AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS —NO COMMENT/CONCERNS 37. Police Department; Office of Housing and Community Development; State Land Use Commission; Office of Planning; Department of Agriculture. PUBLIC COMMENTS 38. None as of this writing. -6- �Al1�iSLAN❑ COIVIIVIUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ?O0 PAUA111 STREET, SUITE 204 • HIL0. HAWAII 96720 Octcber 9, 2020 Mr. Michael Yee Planning Director •-,, �: air"._11i; r•L�_ Hand Delivered ' Subject: State Land Use boundary Amendment Request Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Tax Map Key: 2-4-001: 168 We are pleased to submit this application for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment for our Pocket Neighborhood Project. We believe that this will he a good land use concept and most appropriate for this setting. We will be seeking funding through the Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) program in April. The Low Income Housing Tax Credits are awarded through a statewide competitive process so it is critical that the project be consistent with the land use requirements at the time of the application. To this end we hope that this application can be approved by the end of March to meet that deadline. We will also be submitting a 201 H application through OHCD shortly. We have elected to go through the 201H process as we will need exceptions to parts of the Zoning, Subdivision, and Sewers Codes, including the conversion of the zoning from A-1 a to RM-4. Enclosed are the filing fee and other requirements listed on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment Applicat inn form. If you or your staff have any questions please call me at 987-6750 or email keith.hicdenJ,jamail.corn. Sincerely. Keith Kato Executive Director .7 SC NED X7048 OCT AN EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY I Planning Dept EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER- - --- EKf1��4t - ADMINISTRATION:�80Ef 969-1168 Exhibit �� FAX=8y 935-6916 o �tG DEPT STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDIMENT APPLICATION � (15 ACRES OR LESS COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) PFI'ITIONER: Hawaii Island Community I)evel.opment Carporatioa. PETITION'ER'S SIGNATURE: ��+� � DATE: 8, 2020 ADDRESS: 100 Pauahi Street Suite 701 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 a 1 PETITIONER'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER: Leasee TELEPHONE:{Bus.}^808-319-2422 (Res.) (Fax)_,808-969-1158 1 LANDOWNER(S):_Statte of Hawaii Executive Order 4531 'Trans€er to County of Hawaii i LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S): DATE- October 6,2020 ADDRESS: 99 A u p u n i Street,tHi D,1lawaii)1)6720 TAX MAP KEY: (3) 2-4-aal: 168 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Mohauli Street, Hilo Hawaii 95720 ZONING: Ag-1 Acre. SIZE OF PROPERTY: 9.49 Acre CURRENT STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Agriculture REQUESTED STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION- Urban AGENT: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE 7(13us.) (Res.) (Fax) Please uidicate to whom original coiTespondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL-. Applicant COPIES: (See Instructions on Reverse Side) I COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT REQUEST HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION HILO, HI 96720 TMK: (3) 2-4-001: 168 1 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................. ....... ...... ........ ................................... ............ 4 II. PROJECT LOCATION................................................................................. ...........___........5 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................... .......I.......................... A. The Pocket Neighborhood Concept............................................ ................5 B. Project Timetable and Cost.......... ............................ ......................---.....6 IV INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS....................................... ....6 A. State Land Use ................................................,.................................... ...... B. County General Plan............................. ...................................................... C. County Zoning-.......... ................................................. ............ ......... E. Relationship to SMA .................................................................................... F. Other Permitting Requirements........................... ............... .....................7 V. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................................7 A. General Description ..................................................................................... B. Soils and Topography .. .. ............................................................................... C. Natural Hazards........................................--- ............................. .................8 D. Flora/Fauna..... .......................................................................................... E. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources ............................................... 10 F. Valued Cultural Resources ........................................................--..............10 G. Water and Coastal Resources ................................................................... 10 H. Noise, Air Quality, and Dust....................................................................... 10 I. Scenic and Visual Considerations.................................................................11 VI. SOCIAL AND RELATED CONSIDERATIONS...,......... .... A. Surrounding Land Uses ............ ................................. 11 B. Economic Impacts....................................... ............................. 12 C. Agricultural Impacts ................................. ................................................. 1 VII. INFRASTRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................12 A. Roads.... .....12 C. Wastewater................................................................................................13 D. Solid Waste........................................................ .............................13 E. Other Government Services...................................................................... 14 14 F Other Utilities .. ...... .. ..............- ----....................................................... VIII. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS.........................__._................................. ............ .....14 2 A. Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Environment and Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity ................................14 B. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources...........................14 C. Mitigative Measures.......1.­......­I­I.................­I....I—...... .---..............15 ❑. Alternatives to the Proposed Project.................. ....................................... 15 1X. REGULATORY ANALYSIS ...... ............................,.......... ...............-...-...................................16 A. General Plan LUPAG Map...................... ............................ 16 B. General Plan Polices ...................................................... .......................... 16 X. CONCLUSION. .............................................................20 Figures (follows page) 1. Location Map...................... ....................................................................... 2. Land Use Concept Plan .................................................................-----............6 3. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)..................................................................... 9 Exhibits (follows page 20) A. Archaeological Field Inspectior Report 3 I. INTRODUCTION The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation ("applicant") is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary amendment for a 9.09'1-acre parcel in Waiakea, South Hila, Hawaii from Agriculture to Urban. The property is located off Mohouli Street approximately 1,600 feet southwest of its intersection with Komohana Street (Figure 1) The applicant intends develop the site as a "Pocket Neighborhood" development with small scale residential units surrounding common areas to create a sense of community within the clusters and a central commons area to be enjoyed all the entire development. The applicant plans to retain a buffer between the adjacent residential lots with a minimum width of thirty feet and comprised largely of retained ohia trees. Residences adjacent to the 1-acre lots along the northern and western sides of the property will be single story structures with higher densities and heights provided along tie eastern (makai) and southern (Mohouli) portions of the site. In the central portion of the site the community center will be the social focus of the development. The residential development will be a mix or 1. 2 and possibly 3 bedroom units The specific building type and unit mix have not yet been established and the overall unit count will not exceed that allowed by the County zon ng. All units will be affordable for residents whose household income does not exceed 140%, of the island's median income. A family of four at 140% of the median income in 2020 will have an income of $116,624 per year. Since 1991, The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) has been providing affordable housing for families on Hawaii Island. Their mission is to assis: low and moderate-income residents of the County to secure affordable housing. To date, HICDC has developed 732 affordable homes on the Big Island. These homes are a mix a single family and multi-family units and are roughly balanced between home ownership and rental units. For this project fee simple sales is not allowed, however, leasehold ownership is being considered along with rental units. 4 II. PROJECT LOCATION As noted earlier, the subject property is located off Mohouli Street approximately 1,600 feet southwest of its intersection with Komohana Street, Waiakea, South Hilo, Hawaii (Figure 1). III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. The Pocket Neighborhood Concept Pocket Neighborhoods grew out of the work of Ross Chapin and his colleagues, but the idea is beyond any one person or style. It is pattern of housing that fosters a strong sense of community among nearby neighbors, while preserving their need for privacy. Examples can be found across t-ie spectrum, from small towns, to suburbs to urban areas. Pocket neighborhoods are clustered groups of neighboring houses or apartments gathered around a shared open space —a garden courtyard, a pedestrian street, a series of joined backyards, or a reclaimed alley — all of which have a clear sense of territory and shared stewardship. They can be in urban, suburban or rural areas. These are settings where nearby neighbors can easily know one another, where empty nesters and single householders with far-flung families can find friendship or a helping hand nearby, and where children can have shirttail aunties and uncles just beyond their front gate. For this project the clusters will be arranged around a central community area where gathering spaces, mail pick up, and service opportunities will be housed. Also included will be an open recreational space and a covered space modeled on the Cooper Center in Volcano. See Figure 2. 5 if �. -117 p W �I {; � ,� ��• A�r 5 ern ! L 11 En rx r C r AR,� rk ISO I g FIJI -J - - r �i N 4 B. Proiect Timetable and Cost The applicant hopes to secure State Land Use Boundary Amendment and a 201 H zoning exception approval as soon as possible and begin development of the project. It is anticipated that funding applications will be submitted starting in fail of 2020 and continuing forward. Should the requested tax credits be approved in June 2021 construction of the first phase will commence in early 2022 and be completed by the end of 2023. The completion of the full project will be dependent on funding availability but is expected to be completed by 2024. Cost estimates are very preliminary as the availability of funding will determine the unit count and the mix of unit types. It is estimated that at full build out the project will cost $30 million to $40 million. IV. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS A. State Land Use The subject site is designated State Land Use Agriculture. Concurrently with this request, a State Land Use Boundary Amendment application is being submitted to change the SLU designation from Agriculture to Urban. Based on the size of the area of requested rezoning (9.091 acres), no State Land Use Commission action is required The County of Hawaii can process the rezoning request. A discussion of the extent to which the proposed reclassification conforms to the applicable district standards is required for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment and is Found in the Boundary Amendment application submitted concurrently with this application. B. County General Plan The County General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide ("LU PAG") map designates the subject site as Medium Density Urban. This designation identifies land for residential use with community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses; overall residential density may be up to thirty five (35) units per acre. 6 wo�'uldey]TSnJ=M•wo�'uldeu�ssad7s�w:3•eov6'IT (o311 7 d - 51DI11 HLD21JVNId�VHF7�5501d ►j rinOHOW 0 VIO 31VH Is Lroi1wodJo�)luawd0ja aq PUQI A3iIAO wwo7 puersr 11DAWH k" t i 1 Y � k G 4 H 1 w Lata 2 � f 4g I �T T (l7 ti ri a�oa ! f y .v 1 � G ti J d 1. C f y w � f V I v _T _a E i a L J P M The proposed development resulting in no more than ninety (90) dwelling units or less than 10 units per acre and would be consistent with the Medium-Density Urban designation. No General Plan amendment would be required to effectuate this project. T Additionally, the affordable housing component is needed in this area and should further underscore the viability of this request. C. County Zoning The County zoning of the subject property is Agriculture (A-1 a). The majority of the surrounding properties are zoned A-1 a and RS-10. The large parcels to the south controlled by the University of Hawaii — Hilo are zoned A-1 a. The applicant will be filing a 201 H request with OHCD to bring the zoning to RM-4 and to eliminate the need for loading zones within the project site. E. Relationship to SMA The site is located approximately 1.7 miles from the coastline and outside the County Special Management Area (SMA). No SMA Use Permit is required. F. Other Permitting Requirements As noted earlier, other permits would still be required. First, a State Land Use Boundary Amendment would have to be granted and is being submitted herein. Other permits would be of the "ministerial' variety, such as Subdivision Approval, Building Permits, Grading; etc. V. ENVIRONMENTAL_ CONSIDERATIONS A. General Description The parcel is generally trapezoidal in shape and is accessed via Mohouli Street, which is a County owned and maintained paved access road with a 80-foot average right-of-way and 80-foot average pavement width. There are currently no st,uctures on the subject parcel. The site is situated at the 345 to 360-foot elevation level. The property slopes from west to east with a gradual decline. There does not 7 appear to be any topographic constraint in developing and utilizing the site for residentia use. There are homes an the adjacent 1 acre size lots along Kukuau Street. The general area is primarily residential. The adjacent site to the east is planned for Fire Department use. Further to the east is the Mohouli Senior complex which includes 182 senior rental apartments and the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Adult Day Center. Across Mchouli Street tc. the south is vacant land controlled by the University of Hawaii — Hilo. The annual median rainfall for this area is approximately 120 inches. The average daily temperature ranges from 64 degrees to 77 degrees Fahrenheit. Wind patterns are generally easterly during the day and westerly during the evenings. B. Soils and Topography The subject parcel is located entirely o the 1880-1881 Hilo Lava Flow. The young lava and little soil development on the subject parcel is unsuitable for farming or even grazing and has remained undeveloped. The property is covered with Keaukaha extremely rocky muck 2-10% slopes. The Keaukaha soil series consists of well drained thin organic soils overlying pahoehoe lava bedrock. The Agricultural Capability Subclass rating for this soils is Vlls which includes soils having very severe limitations that make the unsuited for cultivation and that restrict their use largely to pasture or range, woodland or wildlife. As noted earlier, the topography of the site slopes in a west to east direction with an average grade of 1.7 percent. C. Natural Hazards 1, Drainage The Federal Emergency Management Agency {FEMA} Flood Insurance Rate map (Figure 3) (FIRM) identifies the project area as Zone "X" (areas outside of the 500-year flood). There are no identified existing drainage ways on the site 8 Pursuant to County drainage requirements, appropriate drywell and/or similar means to capture runoff from any improvements will be built, if necessary, in conjunction with the development of the property. 2. Volcanic Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards According to the United States Geological Survey maps, the project site is located within Lava Flow Hazard Zone 3; on a scale of ascending risks 9 to 1. The Building Code designates the entire Island of Hawaii Earthquake Zone "D" and contains certain structural requirements to address the relative seismic hazard. All structures would have to comply with this standard. 3. Tsunami Hazard As the site is located 1.7 miles from the ocean and sits at the 350 to 365-foot elevation, it is located outside of the Civil Defense's Tsunami Evacuation Zone. D. Flora/Fauna The vegetation on the site is relatively thick and is dominated by guava saplings and scattered ohi'a with an understory of uluhe. Introduced species typical of disturbed roadsides are present along Mohouli Street. The suburban nature of the surrounding areas would make it less likely to find endangered animal life in this area. It would be possible to find the Island-wide ranging Hawaiian Hawk (Vo), Hawaiian Cwt (Pueo), Hawaiian Goose (Nene), and the Hawaiian Hoary Bat on site, however this is not their main habitat. In addition, introduced bird species (such as clove, Japanese White- eye, house finch, myna) are common in this area. Domestic animals such as cats and dogs, and other animals like rats, pigs and mongoose are also common. These are all common and not endangered. As such, it is unlikely that the development of the subject property would cause any adverse faunal impacts. 9 MITIsF' 3 4,01 8 j H c _ LL LA Z !V far LL f D ty Sa MCI Kh Q � M k' 1 Pi fr .; .. SA kk. ,. r E. Historic/Cultural/Archaeological Resources An Archaeological Field Inspection of the subject property was conducted an July 29, 2524 by ASM Affiliates. {Exhibit g}. No historical properties of any kind were observed. However, in the event any inadvertent discoveries are made during any land disturbance activity relating to this project, work will cease and the applicant will immediately notify the Planning Department and the State DLNR and secure their clearances before proceeding further. F. Valued Cultural Resources It is not known whether the subject or immediate surrounding area was used in the recent past for the gathering of plants by Native Hawaiians. The applicant has not observed any evidence of Native Hawaiians gathering plants on the site or the adjoining properties. Thus, it would appear unlikely that the site would serve such purpose today. Based on the above, it does not appear that the project would have any potential adverse impact relative to the cultural and historical resources of the area. G. Water and Coastal Resources The subject site is located approximately 1.7 miles from the coastline and sits at approximately 355 to 355-foot elevation. There should be no coastal impacts resulting from discharge of wastewater systemsas the project will tie into the county sewer system. Further, being a non- coastal property, no coastal access will be affected. H. Noise, Air Quality, and Dust Mohouli Street wi:l provide access to the proposed subdivision. Access within the housing project will be provided by private roadways and driveways. The existing ambient traffic leve,l in this area should not be significantly impacted with the addition of this residential. Traffic noise from Mohouli Street adjacent to the property will remain the dominant source of traffic noise. As such, the corresponding noise level should remain the same 10 There may, however, be short-term noise and air quality impacts associated with the construction of the infrastructure as well as the vertical construction. In that event, contractors will be required to comply with appropriate noise and related mitigation measures of the State Department of Health. The proposed development should not generate any direct long-term air quality impacts. The only discernible air quality impact could be associated with the vehicular traffic to and from the site. While there will be an impact to the ambient air quality, the impact should not be significant. Especially considering higher EPA standards for automobile air emissions, the air quality impact should be negligible. With the exception of construction dust associated with the required infrastructure of any future dwellings, the short and long-term dust generated by the project should be reasonable. Construction dust, however, like construction noise will have to comply with the State Department of Health's regulations. I. Scenic and Visual Considerations In the Natural Beauty element of the General Plan, there are sites or areas listed as being a scenic resource The subject site is not listed as a scenic site, nor will the proposed rezoning and subdivision action affect any of the scenic resources outlined in the General Plan. Views of any other scenic sites from surrounding roads would not be affected. due to the level topography of the site. VI. SOCIAL AND RELATED CONSIDERATIONS A. Surrounding Land lases The existing land use in this area is a mix of vacant land and residential development. Given the existing conditions; the proposed development would represent an extension of the existing residential nature of this area. To mitigate the impacts to the adjacent one acre lots a buffer of a minimum o 30 feet will he maintained along the common boundary lines. This buffer v,ill retain InUch of the native ohia trees. Residential development along the coinmon property I ines with the one acre lots will be limited to single story 11 construction while higher densities and heights will he uniployed along the Mohouli Street and makat property lines. B. Economic Impacts The requested State Land Use Boundary Amendment would have some measure cf economic impact. The construction of the project will generate short-term economic benefits including construction jobs, purchases from local suppliers and services. More significant is the tong term benefit of adding more affordable housing to the Hilo community. Such housing reduces the cost of living For the residents while providing quality living spaces. This will help with the cost of living for the residents. C. Agricultural Impacts Given the nearby poor soil quality and nearby residential land uses a rezoning of the site to residential use will not detract from the agricultural potential of the region. VII. INFRASTRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Roads Access to the project would be throrIgh Kupuna Place by way of an easement over the adjacent parcel TMK: 2-4-1: 176 and a right turn in and right turn out access point off of Mohouli Street. Kupuna Place is a County owned and maintained roadway with a right-of-way of 50 feet with 32 feet of pavement and sidewalks of both sides. Mohouli Street is owned by the County and has a right of way and pavement width of 80 feet. The easement over TMKC 2-4-1: 176 has been agreed to by the County of Hawaii and its documentation is in process. This access plan was recommended by the Traffic Division over a proposed single access point from the subject property onto Mohouli Street. This later approach would create an additional left turn point on Mohouli Street which would further disrupt the traffic traveling on Mohauli Street. 12 It should be noted that in 2013 the County required the developer of the Mohouli Phase 1 project to deposit $500,000 for the purpose of purchasing the equipment for traffic signals at the intersection of Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street. It was understood at that time that DPW would install the equipment so purchased with those funds. To date those funds have not yet been expended to the applicant's knowledge. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by AECOM in 2011 and focused on the traffic that would be carried on Kupuna Place from 150 residential units, the adult day center and through the second of three phases of the Fire Department complex on TMK: 2-4-1: 176. At that time it was assumed that the Kupuna Place entry onto Mohouli Street would remain stop controlled. B. Water A request for a water commitment has been submitted to the Department of Water Supply. This request is currently under review. The DWS noted that the water use by the Mohouli 1, 2 and 3 projects is less than projected and DWS is evaluating the current request against that background. Should DWS indicate that at this time less than 90 water units would be available the project will be phased to limit the initial development to the number of units DWS could support. C. Wastewater The Hale Ola 0 Mohouli residential project will connect to the county sewer system through easements across TMK 2-4-1:175 and 2-4-1: 177. Connection to the county system will be at the county owned manhole on parcel 177. D. Solid Waste Solid waste will be handled through commercial haulers or the individual homeowners into authorized landfill sites or transfer stations. With the requested SLU Boundary Amendment, the potential for uses with toxic or related chemical waste would be minimal, if at all. 13 E. Other Government Services As this property is a part of the City of Hilo, no extension of government services would be required. There is a Fire Station, Police Station, Public School, Library and a gas station all located within 3 to 5 miles of the subject site. In addition, there are recreation facilities in the general area. As such, the project should not result in the extension of any government services and the required public facilities are located reasonably proximate to the subject site. F. Other Utilities All other utilities such as cable, telephone and electrical services are available to the site. Vlll. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE ANALYSIS A. Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Environment and Maintenance and Enhancement of Loss -Term Productivity If the request were denied, the short-term use of the area of the proposed rezoning would probably continue in its unused condition and will not provide additional affordable housing for the residents of Hilo. B. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources As the site has been relatively disturbed in the past, it is not likely that its development would result in an irreversible commitment of natural or archaeological resources. The soil on the parcel think muck overlying pahoehoe lava from the 1881 lave flow. The potential for viable commercial agricultural use of the property is very minimal at best. An Archaeological Field Inspection Survey was conducted for the subject property and impacts to archaeological sites are not anticipated 14 C. Mitigative Measures The applicant intends to develop the property for residential use. With any construction activity, contractors will be obligated to comply with appropriate State noise and air quality standards. Should unanticipated archaeological finds be discovered in conjunction with any further development of the site, work will stop (as is required by the State and County) and clearance will be secured before work is resumed. There are no identified existing drainage ways on the property. Any and all required grading or grubbing work would be done in conjunction with tie required permits. This is to assure that the development of this site does not adversely affect the drainage of surrounding properties or contribute to erosion or sedimentation. Finally, as the site is undeveloped land there will be no person or businesses to be dislocated by this project. D. Alternatives to the Proposed Project 1. No Project Under the status quo alternative, the site could continue in is idle state. The applicant would also not be able to develop the property. 2. Evaluation of Alternatives The project's impacts to the area's social and physical infrastructure would not be pronounced. Certain mitigative measures could be taken to address any possible impacts associated by the development of this project. Further, the project would be consistent with the land use objectives sought to be accomplished by the County General Plan LUPAG map. In view of the aforementioned; it would appear that none of the alternatives would be more prudenE and beneficial than the requested RM-4 alternative. 15 IX. REGULATORY ANALYSIS A. General Plan LUPAG Map The General Plan provides for the long-range comprehensive development of the Island of Hawaii. It provides direction for balanced growth in the County. The LUPAG map designates the site primarily Medium Density Urban. This designation allows the RM-4 zoning without a General Plan amendment. B. General Plan Pollices The requested zoning would be consistent with the goals, policies, and standards of the General Pian document. For one, it may provide economic opportunities, from increased employment options and through the construction of any improvements required for the subdivision. The addition of single and multifamily residences will increase the real property values. In do ng so, the resultant project should add revenues to the County and State coffers. The project intends to be energy conscious through the use and/or encouragement of solar energy and design features to take advantage of the sun and wind patterns. Maintaining and improving the quality of the environment is important to the success of this project. The General Pian identifies five (5) areas of environmental concerns - air pollution, water quality, soil pollution, solid waste disposal, and noise pollution. As proposed, the project would not violate any of those objectives. Aside from the very limited vehicular transmission, air pollution associated with the project should be negligible. All wastewater would be put into the county sewer system. Drainage drywells will be installed as required as will erosion control measures during construction. This should be sufficient to address any potential surface water, groundwater or coastal water impacts. The archeological survey of the site did not encounter any historic sites. Nonetheless, work will cease if unanticipated archaeological remains are discovered during the development of this project. Work will resume only after proper clearances from the State and/or County have been received. 16 While there may have been sightings of the Hawaiian Hawk ('Io) and Hawaiian short-eared owl (Pueo), this area is not their primary habitat. As such, the subject project should not have any significant impacts on rare or endangered plant or animal life in this area. The proposed affordable housing development will help fulfil the objectives of the housing element by creating affordable housing options. As the project site is approximately 1.7 miles Nom the ocean and has an elevation of 350 to 355 feet. coastal resources concerns are notsignficant for this project. There will be no interference with shoreline access. Further, through the use of county sewer system impacts to the coastal water will be minimal. There will be marginal impact to public facilities. Wastewater will be handled by the Hilo sewage system, and the Department of Water Supply water line is adjacent to the site. Vehicular access to the site has been coordinated with the Traffic Division of DPW. The site is readily accessible by emergency vehicles. Schools and other public facilities are also located proximate to the site, most of them being less than 2 miles away. Finally, in terms of the Land Use and Housing elements, the pertinent goals, policies, and standards of the General Plan note the following: r Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural and physical environments of the County (Land Use Element) • Encourage a volume of construction and rehabilitation of housing sufficient to meet growth needs and ccrrect existing deficiencies (Housing Element) • Aid and encourage the development of a wide variety of housing to achieve a diversity of socio-economic housing mix (Housing Element) • Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community, region and County. (Land Use Element) 17 • Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs of its residents in balance with the physical and social environment. (Land Use Element) ■ Zoning requests shall be reviewed with respect to General Plan designation. district goals; regional plans, State Land Use District, compatibility with adjacent zoned uses, availability of public services and utilities; access, and public need. 0. State Land Use Boundary Amendment Conformance to Urban District Standards The proposed State Land Use Boundary Amendment conforms to Hawai'i Revised Statutes Chapter 15-15 Section 18 as amended October 11, 2013 in the following ways. It shall include lands characterized by "city -like" concentrations of people, structures, streets. urban level of services and other related land uses, It shall take into consideration the following specific factors: • Proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment. The subject property is within the developed area of Hilo. In the immediate vicinity there are hundreds of residential units including areas to the north, and east. ■ Availability of basic services such as schools, parks, wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage, water transportation systems, public utilities, and,police and fire protection; and sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth. As this area is part of the city of Hilo, it is already being serviced. There is a Fire Station. Police Station, Library, Post Office and public school all located within 3 to 5 miles of the subject site. In addition, there are recreation facilities in the general area as well. 18 ■ It shall include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood, tsunami unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects There are no serious topographic, drainage, or soil conditions making the property unsuitable to urban development. ■ Land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, particularly when Indicated for future urban Use on state or county general plans or county community plans or development plans. The property is adjacent to the Sunrise Estate subdivision which is urban in character. Within 500 feet of the site are the Mohouli senior housing complex, the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Adult day Center and the Sunrise Ridge residential subdivision. Also, the LUPAG Map designation of Medium Density Urban supports the requested State Land Use Designation. • It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county community plans or development plans. As previously stated the site's LUPAG Map designation of Medium Density Urban supports the requested State Land Use Designation. • It may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs (1) to (5) when surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district The subject parcel substantially conforms to above criteria and the subject parcel is adjacent to existing urban development. ■ It shall not include lands, the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services. The subject parcel is within the City of Hilo and will not contribute to scattered spot urban development_ 19 ■ It may include lands with a general slope of twenty percent of more if the commission finds that those lards are desirable and suitable for urban purposes and that the design and construction controls. as adopted by any federal, state. or county agency, are adequate to protect the public health, welfare and safety, and the public's interests in the aesthetic quality of the landscape. This criterion does not apply as the subject property has generally zero to 5% slope. X. CONCLUSION Based on the consistency of the proposed State Land use Boundary Amendment request with the County's land use {policies, approval of this request would be logical and reasonable. In addition, the request will help fulfil the need fo, additional housing options and help generate additional property tax revenue for the County. Finally, the request will allow the development of more affordable housing for the residents of the Big Island. 20 LAND COURT SYSTEM ) REGULAR SYSTEM Return by Maii Pickup ) o : Total Number of Pages : Tax Map Key No . (3) 2-4-001 : 168 FROM: STATE OF HAWAII BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES TO: COUNTY OF HAWAII 25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 4531 SETTING ASIDE LAND FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES BY THIS EXECUTIVE ORDER, I, the undersigned, Governor of the State of Hawaii, by virtue of the authority in me vested by Section 171-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended, and every other authority me hereunto enabling, do hereby order that the public land hereinafter described be, and the same is, hereby set aside for the following public purposes : FOR ELDERLY AND/OR AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING AND RELATED PURPOSES, to be under the control and management of the County of Hawaii, being that parcel of land situate at Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii, and identified as "Mohouli Heights Senior Housing Site, " containing an area of 9 . 091 acres, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and delineated on Exhibit "B, " both of which are attached hereto and made parts 682241 1.DOC Planning Dept' 01_MAE1h1bIt hereof, said exhibits being respectively, a survey description and survey map prepared by the Survey Division, Department of Accounting and General Services, State of Hawaii, both being designated C. S . F. No . 25, 579 and dated January 24, 2017 . SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to the condition that upon cancellation of this executive order or in the event of non-use or abandonment of the premises or any portion thereof for a continuous period of one (1) year, or for any reason whatsoever, the County of Hawaii shall, within a reasonable time, restore the premises to a condition satisfactory and acceptable to the Department of Land and Natural Resources, State of Hawaii. SUBJECT, FURTHER, to disapproval by the Legislature by two-thirds vote of either the Senate or the House of Representatives or by majority vote of both, in any regular or special session next following the date of this Executive Order. This executive order does not authorize the recipient of the set aside to sell or exchange or otherwise relinquish the State of Hawaii' s title to the subject public land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of Havii to be affixed. Done attheCapitol at Honolulu this �i� day of Datil 2013 . VJZ14__ DAVI Y. I Governor of the State of Hawaii APPROVED AS TO FORM: CIN Y. OU G Depu�tj Attorney General Dated: �•iarr�'� 1 � ,�D11 FMAK APPSIu. 682241 1.QOC 2 M4_r*vm b) AW--Iuw Gwp d S'L'ATE OF HAWAII office of the Lieutenant Governor THIS IS TO CERT Y That the within is a true copy of Executive Order No. 4 b 3 1setting aside land for public purposes, the original of which is on file in this office. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Lieutenant Governor of the State of Hawaii, has hereunto subscribed his name and caused the Great Seal of the State to be affixed. SHAN S. TSUTSUI Lieutenant Governor of the State of Hawaii f �- DONE in Honolulu, this I day of A. D. 2017 no' �•?FWU 682241 1.DOC 3 Attry:1'••'V i•neefil STATE OF HAWAII SURVEY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES HONOLULU C.S.F.No. 25.579 January 24, 2017 MOHOULI HEIGHTS SENIOR HOUSING SITE Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Being a portion of the Government(Crown) Land of Waiakea. Beginning at the southwest corner of this parcel of land, on the east boundary of Lot 180 as shown on Map 73 of Land Court Application 1205 and at a jog on the north side of Moliouli Street, the coordinates of said paint of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation. Station "HALAI"being 4745.49 feet South and 1023.39 feet West, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South.- I. 2060 53' 52" 335.82 feet along Lots 180, 179 and 178 as shown on Map 73 of Land Court Application 1205; 2. 2530 59' 52" 710.47 feet along Lots 1787 177, 176, 175, 174 and 173 as shown on Map 73 of Land Court Application 1205. 3. 355° 22' 643.58 feet along Public Safety and Related Purposes Site, Governor's Executive Order 4223: �1 mtruro %FFW'D r,..�arnwrm rif Jim nay r annual 14 C.S.F.No. 25.z79 January 2$, 2017 4. Thence along the north side of Mohouli Street on a cu-ve to the right with a radius of 1950.00 feet,the chord azimuth and distance being: 990 31' 34" 887.88 feet to the point of beginaiing and containing an AREA OF 9.091 ACRES. SURVEY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES STATE OF HAWAII By: S ` Gerald Z. Yonashiro Land Surveyor rk Compiled from map and desc. furn. by Island Surveying, Inc. Said map and desc. have been examined and checked as to form and mathematical correctness but not on the ground by the Survey Division, AWL ANnluey!yyr}� 1 r Lot 104 Lot 377 J, �A 18- Lot Lot 345 ` H (Mapes , 75) Lot 348 Lot 346 i Lot 172 Loi 173 Lot 347 r Lot 174 r r � r rn Lot 175 r _ Lot 278 J r 'Q' Lot 177 ,47 G° r �► 716 Lot 175 i y Lot 179 r PVBUC SAFEII'AND V°t, r /'► RM ATED PURPOSES SffE 9.091 ACRES ` 11 Governor Order4223Jtive r� +7 + !r1 =�a s 2sy Lot 180 r i4 4745.99 S Lot 7 (C.S.F. 24,598) y � 1 'ih 2(]23.39 W r� X41+A Lot 2 _ ROAD LOT e� rp_ 'd7 Governor's Executive AC Fir — g) Order 4271 yrs — 897. G° Lot 181 �oryry° uI� B8 L i (C.S.F 24,765) xolffo ]]} �� to K0,4rana St Lot 28'1 �!^+'+�[ Lot 183 ' � t `� � WHO W T TO SCAM Lai 284 UNlVERSffY OF NAWNI AND ALLIED PURPOSES SfM Governor's Executive Order 3814 T RLIM el 11,0 (C.S.F 22,952) EXHIBIT "B" MOHODU HEIGHTS SENIOR HOUSING SITE ,bc H-010(17) Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Q 8K Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet TW 2_4-01; 108 SURVEY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND GENERAL SERVICES GS.F. Na 25+575 STATE OF HAWAII r1AAC Jawary 24y 2017 LANNING DEPT geometrician CaOCT T82021Pm1:40 REC'D HAND DELIVERED A S S O C I A T E S , L L C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com October 5, 2021 Tracie-Lee Camero Planning Commission Division lawai`i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, flawai`i 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: Subject: Final Environmental Assessment, Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, TMK (3rd) 2-4-001:168, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Thank you and your associates for your assistance in reviewing and processing the Final Environmental Assessment(FEA) for the project. Attached is a hardcopy of the FEA for Planning Department files. We have completed the submittal to OEQC, using the FONSI letter, and it is slated to be published on October 8. We have also submitted the required library copy to the I lawai`i State Documents Center. Upon publication, I will also send via mail or email a "Dear Participant" letter providing notice of Final EA publication to all parties who submitted comments to the Draft EA. Thank you for your assistance in the EA process. If you have any questions, please contact me at 969-7090, or e-mail to rterry(ihawaii.rr.com. Sincerely, I� Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Attach: Final EA Cc: Keith Kato, I IICDC: keith.hicdcLgmail.com (no attachments) Planning Dept. Exhibit 3 tY as p M, .. Mitchell D.Roth + tendo Kern Mayor = I r;� Dir ecrur Lee E.Lord Jeffrey W.Darrow Managing Director ectars ; •; bepiny Direrror ,•aF A, wim Hawaii Office Ea st IlawaN office 74-51}44.Lne Keol+vkalole H�+v +i+ 101 Pauahi Street,suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hanari 96740 County of Hawai 1 }filo,llawai'i 96730 Phone(808)32--4770 Phmnc(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 September 16,2021 Environmental Review Program Office of Planning and Sustainable Development 235 S. Beretania Street, Suite 702 Honolulu, HI 96813 Dear Director, Subject: Final Environmental Assessment(FEA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Hale Ola o Mohouli Housing Project Location: South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii TMIK: (3) 2-4-001:168 With this letter, the Hawaii County Planning Department (Accepting Authority) hereby transmits electronically the Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FEA-FONSI) for the proposed Hale Ola D Mohouli Affordable Housing Project located on the subject parcel (TMK: (3) 24-001:168) in Hilo on the Island of Hawaii, for publication in the next available edition of the Environmental Notice. The Hale Ola D Mohouli Affordable Housing Project is being proposed to construct up to 90 units of affordable rental housing for seniors and families by creating a pocket neighborhood concept on 9.091 acres of land. Additional improvements are also planned such as landscaping, driveways, utilities and other related improvements. The Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact (DEA- AI~ONSI)was published in the OEQC's August 8, 2021 issue of the Environmental Notice. The FEA includes copies of comments received and the corresponding responses from the applicant that were received during the 30-day public comment period on the DEA-AFONSI. Based on the findings from Part 5 of the FEA, the Planning Department has determined that this project will not have a "significant effect" or "significant impact" on the quality of the environment and have therefore issued a FONSI- This FONSI does not constitute approval of the project or any project components or proposed uses. im i%.plannin,_L,.hait a iicounh.ew, Howai'i County is an Equal Opporfvnhr,ProvidBrnnd Employer pIannin�-p 111% aiicount4.pu%- ERP/EN September 16,2021 Page 2 If you have any question regarding this letter, please contact Tracie-Lee Camera of our Planning Department staff at(808) 961-8166 or via email at tract e-lee.cameror:hawaiicounty.go Sincerely, A,q-4��4 Nada Jackson`or(Sep 16,202115:42 H-ST) ZENDQ KERN Planning director TC:jaa P 11coh01�p[an ninglpnbtic lwp%vin60kh34312p2 ilbale ola o nxohouli%FeaFonsi_to oegc.docx cc (via email). Ron Terry, Geometrician Associates, Environmental Consultant, <rterrya.hawau.rr.com> Keith Kato, Hawaii Island Community Development, <keith.hiedc@gmail.com> From: webmaster@hawaii.aov To: DSEDT DPSD Environmental Review Program Subject: New online submission for The Environmental Notice Date- Monday,September 27,20219:23:42 AM Action Name Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Type of DocumentfDetermination Finai environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact(FEA-FONSI) HRS§343-5(a)Trigger(s) ■ (1)Propose the use of state or county lands or the use of state or county funds Judicial district South Milo,llawai`i Tax Map Key(s)(TMK(s)) (3)2-4-001:168 Action type Applicant Other required permits and approvals State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban by Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council•201H Exemption of County Zone(Windward Planning Commission and Hawai'i County Council)• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (Sta*e DOH)•Grading,Grubbing and Driveway Permits(County DPW)• Building Permits and Plan Approval(County DPW and Planning) Discretionary consent required State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban Approving agency Hawai'i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3, Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Agency contact name Tracie-Lee Camero Agency contact email(for info about the action) Tracie-Lee.CameroCchawaiicounty gov Email address or URL for receiving comments Tra6e-Lee-Came ro(cZhawanou nty.aov Agency contact phone (808)961-8166 Agency address 101 Pauahi Street Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 United States Map It Applicant Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Applicant contact name Keith Kato Applicant contact email Keith.hicdc0a amail.corn Applicant contact phone (808)319-2422 Applicant address 100 Hauahi Street Suite 20 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 United States Mar) I Was this submittal prepared by a consultant? Yes Consultant GEOMETRICIAN ASSOCIATES, L_C Consultant contact name Ron Terry Consultant contact email rte rryQhawaii.rr.com Consultant contact phone (808)987-5239 Consultant address 10 HINA STREET Hilo,H 196720-2005 United States MaD It Action summary HICDC,a non-profit dedicated to deveJoping affordable housing,proposes to constrict up to 90 units of affordable housuzg on a 909 I-acre goveminent property in Hilo.Land use designations will be changed to State Land Use Urban and County zoning of multi-family residential.The site's vegetation is lightly disturbed native'6hi`a forest on the 1881 lava flow.Surveys have determined that no historic properties,cultural sites or uses,or threatened or endangered plant species are present on the property.Mitigation includes landscaping,construction of a fence adjacent to residential properties,timing of vegetation clearutg to avoid impacts.to listed vertebrate species,acid NPDE-S and grading permits with BM-Ps.Traffic impacts will be minor and within the capacity of the existing intersection. Reasons supporting determination Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, outlines those factors agencies must consider when determining whether an Action has significant effects_ (a)In considering the significance of potential environmental effects,agencies shall consider and evaluate the sum of effects of the Proposed Project on the quality of the environment. (b)In determining whether an action may have a significant effect on the environment,the agency shall consider every phase of a Proposed Project,the expected impacts,and the proposed mitigation measures. In most instances,an action shall be determined to have a significant effect on the environment if it may- 1. Irrevocably commit a natural,cultural, or historic resource_No valuable natural or cultural resource would be committed or lost.A common native vegetation type and several common native plants are present, but no rare,threatened or endangered species or unique native ecosystems would be adversely affected.An archaeological survey has determined that no historic sites are present on the property or would be affected_No valuable cultural resources and practices such as forest access,fishing,gathering, hunting,or access to ceremonial sites would be affected in any way. 2.Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment. No restriction of beneficial uses would occur by construction and occupation of affordable rental housing on the property- 3. roperty_3.Conflict with the State's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law. The State's long-term environmental policies are set forth in Chapter 344, HRS.The broad goals of this policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life.The Proposed Project is environmentally beneficial and all adverse impacts are minor,and it is thus consistent with all elements of the State's long-term environmental policies_ 4. Have a substantial adverse effect on the economic welfare,social welfare,or cultural practices of the community and State,The Proposed Project would have highly beneficial and no substantial adverse effects on the economic or social welfare of the Big Island community or the State of Hawai'i. 5. Have a substantial adverse effect on public health.The Proposed Project would not affect public health and safety in any adverse way.Wastewater will be disposed of in conformance with State Department of Health regulations- 6- Involve adverse secondary impacts,such as population changes or effects on public facilities_The scale and context of the Proposed Project would not produce any major secondary impacts,such as population changes or effects on public facilities_ 7. Involve a substantial degradation of environmental quality. The Proposed Project is minor and environmentally benign,and thus it would not contribute to environmental degradation_ 8, Be individually limited but cumulatively have substantial adverse effect upon the environment or involves a commitment for larger actions.The adverse effects of the Proposed Project involve very limited and temporary disturbance to traffic,air quality, noise,and visual quality during construction. During construction,there is at least a small potential for noise, traffic and dust impacts from the affordable rental housing development to acccumu late with those of the proposed adjacent Fire and Police Dispatch Center and the Wailani Mixed Use Project, under the scenario of two or more more being constructed at the same time.These impacts are mitigable and can be handled by construction-phase measures that can easily be implemented by the Hawaii County Department of Public Works, which is monitoring traffic in this area.Although traffic on Mohouli and Komohana Street would clearly rise as a result of all three projects,With the vast majority being attributed to the Wailani project,traffic analysis has demonstrated that with the extension of Ponahawai Street by Wailani,traffic impacts at Mohculi Street would not be severe and level of service would remain acceptable. 9, Have a substantial adverse effect on a rare,threatened,or endangered species,or its habitat. Thorough survey has determined that no endangered plant species are present Other than the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat and the recently delisted Hawaiian hawk, island wide-ranging species that will PxpPnPncP no adverse imparts due M mitigation in the form of timing of vegetation removal andlor survey, no rare,threatened or endangered species of fauna are known to exist on or near the property,and none would be affected by any project activities. 10_Have a substantial adverse effect on air or water quality or ambient noise levels. No substantial effects to air,water,or ambient noise would occur. Brief,temporary effects would occur during construction and would be mitigated_Contractors will be required to consult with DOH per Title 11, Chapter 46, HAR (Community Noise Control)prior to construction. DOH would then review the proposed activity,location,equipment,project purpose and timetable in order to decide whether a permit is necessary and what conditions and mitigation measures,such as restriction of equipment type, maintenance requirements, restricted hours,and portable noise barriers,will be necessary. Dust will be controlled per State regulations through extensive 13M Ps- Erosion and sedimentation impacts will be avoided by implementation of Best Management Practices during grading. 11_Have a substantial adverse effect on or be likely to suffer damage by being located in an environmentally sensitive area such as a flood plain,tsunami zone,sea level rise exposure area, beach, erosion-prone area,geologically hazardous land, estuary,fresh water, or coastal waters.Although the Proposed Project is located in an area with volcanic and seismic risk,the entire Island of Hawai'i shares this risk.The facilities are not imprudent to construct and will employ design and construction standards appropriate to the seismic zone.The property is not located in a flood zone or any other hazardous area, and it would not affect any such area. Due to the elevation of the property at approximately 350 feet above sea level,there is no risk to the Proposed Project from sea level rise.The project has adapted to climate change by accounting for the potential for larger storms,through minimizing hard surfaces that generate runoff in heavy rainfall. 12_Have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes,during day or night, identified in county or state plans or studies. No scenic sites or views are located nearby or would be affected in any way..All exterior lighting will be shielded and designed with the proper spectra to protect dark skies and transiting seabirds. 13_Require substantial energy consumption or emit substantial greenhouse gases.Construction would involve unavoidable small but non-negligible carbon emissions. Occupation of the housing would entail greenhouse gas emissions that would be essentially the same regardless of where the residents live, leading to no net increase.Carbon emissions as a result of construction and operation of the Proposed Project would be considered negligible and are not expected to contribute significantly to global climate change. Attached documents(signed agency letter&EAIEIS) ■ FONSI-9 15 2021-LTR-TC-ENVIRONMENTAL-REVIEW-GROGRAM-RE_-FEA-FONSI-FOR- HALE-OLA-0-MOHOULI-PROJECT.pdf ■ Final-EA-Hale-Ola-O-Mohouli-Affordable-Housing-Project.pdf 5hapefile . The location map for this Final EA is the same as the lccatron map for the associated Draft EA. Action location map r Mohouli-Affordable-Pro ep dy.zio Authorized individual Ron Terry Authorization • The above named authorized individual hereby certifies that he/she has the authority to make this submission. Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Final Environmental Assessment TMK (3rd) 2-4-001 :168 South Hilo District, Hawaii Island, State of Hawaii October 2021 Prepared for: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hale ala O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project TMK{3rd}2-4-001:168 South Hilo D1 strict, Hawaii Island, State of Hawai`t APPLICANT: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 APPROVING AGENCY: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 CONSULTANT: Geometrician Associates LLC 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawai`i 96720 CLASS OF ACTION.- Use of County Land and County Funds This document is prepared pursuant to: The Hawaii Enviromnental Protection Act, Chapter 343.Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS),and Title 11,Chapter 200.1,Hawaii Department of Health Administrative Rules[HAR]. Ithis page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY............................................... ........................................................................................... PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE AND NEED AND E.A. PROCESS............. 1 1.1 Project Description and Location ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Need .......................... ...........--........................... 7 1.3 Environmental Assessment Process............................................................................. 7 1.4 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination ........................................................... S 1.5 Cost and Schedule 9 PART 2: ALTERNATIVES --......................... .............................-. 9 2.1 No Action Alternative............. 9 2.2 Alternative Locations for Affordable Housing Project.................... 2.3 Alternative Strategies Involving Existing Facilities.................................................... 9 PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION 10 3.1 Physical Environment.............--.......---...---....... ................ •. .... ........... 10 3.1.1 Climate,Geology, Soils and Geologic Hazard............................................... 10 3.1.2 Drainage, Water Features and Water Quality................................................. 13 3.1.3 Flora, Fauna,and Ecosystems ..................................•..................................... 14 3.1.4 Air Quality, Scenic Resources and Noise....................................................... 20 3.1.5 Hazardous Substances,Toxic Waste and Hazardous Conditions........ .......— 22 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural ..------. ......... ...... -----.. . ....... .................... 23 3.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics....................................................................... 23 3.2.2 Cultural Resources ...............................I......................... 24 3.2.3 Archaeology and Historic Sites ...................................................................... 29 3.3 Infrastructure .................................................•--•--••--....................----...............--.----...... 30 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Services .......................................................................... 30 3.3.2 Roadways and Traffic..................--......---........... ......---............ 31 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts.......... .................................................................. 33 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals.....-.......--- ............................... 33 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies....................................................... 34 3.6.1 Hawaii State Plan ....................................................•-•----•......-- .............. 34 3.6.2 Hawaii State Land Use Law ............................... ...... 34 3.6.3 Hawaii County Zoning.................................................................................. 37 3.6.4 Hawaii County General Plan................•---..................................................... 37 PART 4: DETERMINATION .................................................................................................... 40 PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS.............................................-----------.............................. 40 REFERENCES ......................... ................................ 43 LIST OF TABLES TABLE I Plant Species Observed on Project Site....................................................................... 18 TABLE 2 Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics..........-...... ........ .... 23 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE I Location Map ................................... . .......... ......................------ .............. 2 FIGURE 2 TMK Map......... ....................... 3 FIGURE 3 Project Site Photos ...................................................................................................... 4 FIGURE 4 Concept Site Plan.................................................................................---- .................. 5 FIGURE 5 Sea Level Rise Map ..................................................................................................... 12 FIGURE 6 Flood Insurance Rate Map and Nearby Intermittent Channels.................................... 13 FIGURE 7 Land Use Designations of Property and Vicinity........................................................ 35 Page r Hale Ola 0 Mohaarli affordable Housing Environmental Assessment LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX I a Comments in Response to Early Consultation APPENDIX I b Comments to Draft EA and Responses APPENDIX 2 Traffic Impact Assessment Report APPENDIX 3 Archaeological Field Inspection Report and SHPD Concurrence Letter APPENDIX 4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment APPENDIX 5 Market Study Preliminary Findings SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low-income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawaii. HICDC proposes to construct up to 90 units of affordable housing on a 9.031-acre State property in Hiio that was transferred via Executive Order(EO)to the County of Hawaii for affordable housing purposes. The property is designated in the County General Pian for Medium Density Urban uses but is currently within the State Land Use Agricultural District and County Zoned for agriculture. HICDC has submitted a State Land Use Boundary Amendment which is currently in process. HICDC intends to utilize the Section 201H, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS)process obtain the County zoning of RM-4 (multi-family residential, 4,000 square feet minimum per building site), matching uses makai of the project site. The vegetation is lightly disturbed native `Ohi`a forest on the 1881 Iava flow. Primary access to the property will occur from Kupuna Place to Mohouli Street, via an easement on the adjacent parcel, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176,which is currently being developed as a Fire and Police Dispatch Center. Surveys have determined that no historic properties, cultural sites or uses, or threatened or endangered plant species are present on the property. Mitigation includes landscaping, construction of a fence adjacent to residential properties, timing of vegetation clearing and/or surveys to avoid impacts to listed vertebrate species,NPDES and grading permits with Best Management Practices during construction to avoid erosion and sedimentation, and precautionary conditions related to inadvertent finds of cultural materials. Traffic impacts will be minor and within the capacity of the existing intersection. There will be no noticeable change to the traffic level of service on Mohouli Street or other roads. Page ii Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PURPOSE AND NEED AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 1.1 Project Description and Location The Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low-income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawaii. HICDC proposes to construct up to 90 units of affordable rental housing in Hilo, Island of Hawaii. The 9.091-acre property on which the facilities would be built, TMK (3) 2-4-001:168, is a State property that was transferred via Executive Order(EO) 4531 for Affordable Housing Purposes to the County of Hawaii. The vegetation is lightly disturbed native `ohi`a forest on the 1881 lava flow. Priinary access to the property will occur from Kupuna Place to Mohouli Street, via an easement on the adjacent parcel, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176, which is currently being developed as a Fire and Police Dispatch Center(Figures 1-4). The development concept for the Proposed Project is to provide affordable rentals for seniors and families. One method of achieving this is to create pocket neighborhoods where clusters of units are arranged around central greens. Under this concept, the units would typically be single-family dwellings, duplexes, and up to four-plex structures not exceeding two stories in height. An illustration of this development type for this site is shown in Figure 4. This concept is dependent on securing the necessary funding and may be altered if appropriate funding is not secured, but in any case, the project will consist of no more than 90 residential units. The Proposed Project would remove existing vegetation, grade using onsite material by balancing cut and fill, install utilities (including connection to the municipal wastewater system), install a border fence on the western side of the property, create residential spaces, construct buildings, and provide accessways, parking and landscaping for each building. The property is designated in the County General Plan for Medium Density Urban uses but is currently within the State Land Use Agricultural District, with a County Zoning of A-la(agriculture, minimum lot size one acre). After the EA process is complete, HICDC intends to pursue a reclassification of the property to the State Land Use Agricultural District and utiIize the Section 201 H, Hawai`i Revised Statutes (HRS)process in a request filed with the County Office of Housing and Community Development(OHCD). This law was enacted to provide a process whereby an affordable housing project may be granted exemptions from any statutes, ordinances and rules of any governmental agency relating to planning, zoning and construction standards that do not negatively affect the health and safety of the general public. HICDC seeks to obtain County zoning of RM-4 (multi-family residential,4,000 square feet minimum per building site). This 201H filing also requests the elimination of the loading zone requirement{which HICDC has found is generally not needed at apartments, where loading trucks can utilize the parking lot)-, a reduction in the minimum separation between main buildings from 15 to 10 feet consistent with the Building Code (to accommodate a mix with more single-family residence, to meet demand); and the elimination of the requirement that neighboring lots adjacent to a County sewer line connect to the sewer line, in order to not unreasonably burden adjacent properties that already have conforming systems. Page 1 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing EnvironmentalAssessment Figure 1. Location Ma 44r4W 4 • . .- I PIR Base Map C Google Earth North Figure 2. TMK Map A 16 tU 65 6g X31 �� `•fie Q`�� �'��-� �� 158 .15 SEE '168 err w. aoa3 k 176 - 4a. Source: Hawaii County Real Property Tax Maps Plat 2-4-1 Page 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment r.':. .. � �� ::�Hl�'•��:. � ?�,i� ..:Its .. ".. " UV wo 44 �F• y r.9 ii I 4. " nF�c. �a� y�'r ice. •S.' _' ^l. ��t"e��4'Tq r f"«,�x, _' ••nig;,�• , M , 441 7f- -All - _ ter::-�, �.� - ";� ~i-.r. � _ i• moo property F •A Google Eart .1:�5 fi �34J IF 6PRr +fry r Fes• SIy- I __ fN�EC��r �' ��' W 5F GENERATOR �'' �• t._--U � 1,120 SF FUEL TANK i A� -erg-�c,.��. �. .C/ I� ��_-� f f :f ,e•- - ,s arFf f e33;.r �_— -=:�,:t�;. ,� � ;, =�,---ter — •; - L:>,;:� ��`;.•-;•.;r,..,:•: ':f� 4 a ��� Vii''---�:c �___�+`•�"_��. �..:c:-=;���" --------- --------- ._. _ Site Plan 0 0' 60' [this page intentionally lett blank] Page 6 Hale(]la 0 Mohoub Affordable fordable Housing Em4ronmenial Assessment 1.2 Purpose and Need The purpose of the Proposed Project is to meet a portion of the demand for affordable rental housing in East Hawaii_ Since 1991, HICDC has been providing housing for low and moderate income residents on the Island of Hawaii, Until recently, home construction on the Big Island had outpaced population growth, albeit skewed to upper income levels. Since shortly after the start of the coronavirus pandemic, the demand for housing has skyrocketed--partly fueled by mainland retirees and tech workers fleeing crowded urban areas —and the affordable housing crisis has worsened. The Proposed Project would answer the need for additional affordable rental housing in East Hawaii at a centrally located site supplied with existing utility infrastructure, within a mile or two of shopping, schools, and job centers. A Market Study prepared for this project by Collier's International (Appendix 5 contains preliminary findings)reviewed the need for affordable housing for households with incomes 60% of the median income and below. The area of coverage was Hilo and its secondary market areas from. Wainaku to Pepe`ekeo and Kea`au to Kurtistown, as well as specifically for the project site. The analysis concluded that after accounting for available affordable housing units there remains a large demand: Unmet Housing Demand for All Households 60% AMI and below Hilo Primary Trade Area 5,152 units Secondary Trade Area 1,266 units Total 6,418 units Unmet Housing Demand for Senior Households 60% AMI and below Hilo Primary Trade Area 842 units Secondary Trade Area 56 units Total 1,098 units Demand for Affordable Units at Hale Ola O Mohonli Total 60%AMI and below 373-708 units Senior Units 62-117 units This indicates that there is a substantial need for affordable housing such as that proposed. 1.3 Environmental Assessment Process This Environmental Assessment(EA) discusses possible impacts the Proposed Project may have on the environment and presents mitigative strategies for any potential adverse impacts the Proposed Project may generate. This Environmental Assessment(EA) is being conducted in accordance with Chapter 343 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes(HRS). This law, along with its implementing regulations, Title 11, Chapter 200.1, of the Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), is the basis for the environmental impact process in the State of Hawaii. According to Chapter 343, an EA is prepared to determine impacts associated with an action, to develop mitigation measures for adverse impacts, and to determine whether any of the impacts are significant according to thirteen specific criteria. Part 4 of this document states the anticipated finding that no significant impacts are expected to occur; Part 5 lists each criterion and presents the preliminary findings for each made by the applicant in close consultation with the County of Page 7 Hale Ola 0 Mohoub Affordable Housing Envir unmental Assessment Hawaii Planning Department, the approving agency. If, after considering comments to the Draft EA, the approving agency concludes that no significant impacts would be expected to occur, then the agency will issue a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), and the action will be permitted to proceed to other appropriate approval and permit processes. If the agency concludes that significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the Proposed Project,then an Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)will be prepared. 1.4 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination The following agencies and organizations were consulted by letter/email on April 20,2021 as part of development of the Environmental Assessment. Federal: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State: Department of Health Department of Land and Natural Resources Office of Hawaiian Affairs University of Hawaii at Hilo C oun : County Council Department of Environmental Management Department of Public Works Department of Water Supply Finance Department Fire Department Planning Department Police Department Private: Sierra Club Nearby Property Owners: Ching, Goodwin, Julian, Martins, Okuda, Otis, Park, Sabnani, Sugai Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce A sample of the early consultation letter and responses received are contained in Appendix 1a. Notice of the availability of the Draft EA was published in the August 8, 2021 OFOC EnyirownCnlal1 oticc. Appendix Ib contains written comments on the Draft EA and the responses to these comments_ Various laces in the EA have been modified to reflect input received in the comment letters: additional or modified non-procedural text is denoted by double underlines_ as in this pararapli. Page 8 Hale Ola 0 Mohourli A f ordable Housing Environmental Assessment 1.5 Cast and Schedule Assuming the property is granted the requested land use designation changes, HICDC will finalize design, secure financing and apply for Plan Approval to the Planning Department, and then apply for a grading and grubbing permit and various building pen-nits. The estimated cost for the Proposed Project is $47 million. The project is expected to be ready for construction in late 2022 and completed mid-2424. PART 2: ALTERNATIVES 2.1 No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the County of Hawaii would not construct the affordable rental housing project on this or any other site in the area. The benefits provided by the expansion of housing opportunities would not be realized, but there would be no disturbance of dhe existing ground surface or vegetation, and no impacts to neighbors or area traffic. The No Action Alternative provides a baseline for comparing the impacts of the Proposed Project. 2.2 Alternative Locations Affordable Housing Project The property was designated by the State Department of Land and Natural Resources as a site for affordable rentals and has been turned over to the County of Hawaii for such development. HICDC monitors the availability of suitable affordable housing sites throughout the County of Hawaii that could be similarly conveyed. The only other government-owned and currently available site within central Hilo that has necessary access to the County sewer system is a 0.34-acre site on Puainako Street makai of Komohana Street{TMK 3-2-4-1:155}. That site is smaller than needed and has significant slopes unsuitable for the proposed development concept, and it is not being considered further. No other suitable sites have been identified; therefore, no alternative sites have been advanced in this Environmental Assessment. 2.3 Alternative Strategies Involving Existing Facilities In some cities, existing structures such as commercial and market housing complexes can simply be renovated and converted to affordable rental housing. This can be an economical solution that utilizes existing materials and land in an efficient manner. However, in order to be cost-effectively converted, the complexes need to be in reasonably good condition and have the utility and other infrastructure necessary for housing consistent with modern codes and regulations. To HICDC's knowledge, no existing sites meet these conditions. HICDC therefore does not consider any such actions as worthy of consideration at this time, and therefore it has not advanced in this Environmental Assessment as an alternative. Page 9 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli A f ordable Housing Environmental Assessment PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND NUTIGATION MEASURES Basic Geographic Setting The location for the Proposed Project is referred to throughout this EA as the property(see Figures 1-4). The terns project area is used to describe the general environs of this part of Hilo. The property is a vacant forest of`ohi`a with significant invasion by alien plants and is bordered by Mohouli Street on the south,by the developing Fire and Police Dispatch Center on the east,by residences on agriculturally zoned lots that are part of Sunrise Estates on the north and west. 3.1 Physical Environment 3.1.1 Climate, Geology, Soils and Geologic Hazards Environmental Setting The climate in the area is warm and moist, with a high average annual rainfall of about 135 inches and a mean annual temperature of approximately 75 degrees Fahrenheit(GiambelIuca et al 2013; UH Hilo- Geography 1998). The property is located at about 350 feet in elevation above mean sea level. The underlying geology is a Mauna Loa lava flow dated from 1881 (Wolfe and Morris 1996). On May 1, 1880, an eruption began in Moku`aweoweo, the summit crater of Mauna Loa, and lasted a few days. The following November, the eruption resumed, this time from vents along the Northeast Rift Zone. Lava streamed down the mountain toward Hilo Town, the main flow following what was then Kukuau Gulch. The flow reached the property in Iate June, 1881, completely covering it, and then continued inakai. The eruption lasted till August 11, stopping just short of a mile from Hilo Bay. Despite the recent age of the lava flow, the area has developed soil due to the rapid vegetation of the lava and buildup of organic material. The soil on the property is Keaukaha highly decomposed plant material, 6 to 20 percent slopes. This soil occurs in undulating to rolling topography of the underlying pahoehoe lava. Rock outcrops occupy about 25 percent of the area. In a representative profile, the surface layer is very dark brown muck about eight inches thick and underlain by pahoehoe lava bedrock. This soil is strongly acidic. The soil above the lava is rapidly permeable. The pahoehoe lava is very slowly permeable,but water moves rapidly through the cracks. Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is slight. In places, roots are matted over the pahoehoe lava or extend a few feet into die cracks. The suitability of the soil as a source of both topsoil and road fill is poor: pahoehoe lava at a depth of less than 10 inches. Permeability is about 3 to 20 inches per hour, reaction is roughly I to 5.5 pH, shrink-swell potential is high, and corrosivity for both uncoated steel and concrete is moderate. The agricultural capability subclass rating for this sails is VIIs (limited mainly because it is shallow, droughty or stony), which includes soils that have very severe limitations that make them unsuited to cultivation and that restrict their use largely to pasture or range, woodland or wildlife. Additionally, the property is not prime or unique farmland and is not designated as Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH). As such, conversion of the property to urban uses as part of the Proposed Project will not be detrimental to the island's agricultural resource base,nor will it have an adverse impact on the overall agricultural productivity of the region and the island. Page 10 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment The entire Big Island is subject to geologic hazards, especially lava flows and earthquakes. Volcanic hazard as assessed by the U.S. Geological Survey in this area of Hilo is 3 on a scale of ascending risk 9 to 1 (Heliker 1990:23). The hazard risk is based on the fact that Mauna Loa is an active volcano. Volcanic hazard zone 3 areas have had I to 5 percent of their land area covered by lava flaws or ash since the year 1800, but are at f ower risk than zone 2 areas because of their greater distance from recently active vents and/or because the local topography makes it less likely that flows would cover these areas. The Island of Hawai`i experiences high seismic activity and is at risk from major earthquake damage (USGS 2000), especially to structures that are poorly designed or built. In October of 2006,two damaging earthquakes of magnitude 6.7 and 5.0 struck the west side of Hawaii Island, and a 6.9-magnitude quake shook Kilauea in May 2018. These earthquakes caused no known damage to the property or nearby facilities. The property is undulating, with no surrounding steep slopes, and does not appear to be subject to subsidence, landslides or other forms of mass wasting. No lava tube caves were observed,but underground voids of various sizes are likely because of the pahoehoe substrate. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Geologic conditions impose no constraints on the Proposed Project. Most of the surface of Hawaii Island is subject to eventual lava inundation, and any facilities in Hilo face risk. The utilization of the area for affordable rental housing is not imprudent to undertake, and given the need, the State, County and HICDC have determined that it is sensible to construct housing here. Project design will take the seismic setting into account and will include geotechnical investigations for voids in the lava and mitigate appropriately_ No other mitigation measures are expected to be required. There is a scientific consensus that the earth is warming due to manmade increases in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, according to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on CIimate Change (UH Manoa Sea Grant 2014). Global mean air temperatures are projected to increase by at least 2.77 by the end of the century. This will be accompanied by the warming of ocean waters, expected to be highest in tropical and subtropical seas of the Northern Hemisphere. For Hawai`i, where warming air temperatures are already quite apparent, not only is the equable climate at risk but also agriculture, ecosystems,the visitor industry and public health. Guidance to federal agencies for addressing climate change issues in environmental reviews was released in August 2015 by the Council on Environmental Quality (US CEQ 2016). The guidance urged that when addressing climate change, agencies should consider: 1)the potential effects of a project on climate change as indicated by assessing greenhouse gas emissions in a qualitative, or if reasonable, quantitative way; and 2)the effects of climate change on a project and its environmental impacts. It recommends that agencies consider the short-and long-term effects and benefits in the alternatives and mitigation analysis in terms of climate change effects and resiliency to the effects of a changing climate. The State of Hawaii in Hawaii Revised Statutes §226-109 encourages a similar analysis, and both Act 17 of the 2018 Hawaii Legislature and Title 11, Chapter 200.1 now require analysis of sea-level rise and greenhouse gases in environmental impact statements. In terms of precipitation,wet and dry season contrasts will increase, and wet tropical areas in particular are likely to experience more frequent and extreme precipitation. In general, rainfall in Hawaii has been variable in the recent past with some years drier and some wetter than average. The El Nina Southern Page 11 Hale nla 0 Mahouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Figure56 Sea Level Rise Map + Hawaii Island Select a site.. USEMARS F'(POSURE * Q5ea I.a++ei rYise Eapnsure Area _ IYfrt 9.5 Ft 11 Ft 7-I)f[ /7,ilu$n R♦ver 1sio�rrul'Poul Stale Park - D 'c;..- I�c•Jiriu f? VLUERABJUN 0 Potential Economic Loss 0 Q Flooded Hi9hwey5 i! OTHER OVERLAYS ■ r expand • collapsa clear • hide Mohquli Park i1AIVad&rty a Project Site lle'BhlsPark <, _ PaaclOOS reap ria:a xzsrc Terme o7 use R±pxr a mea erre Oscillation (i.e., periodic variation in winds and sea surface temperatures in the Pacific, the warming phase of sea temperature known as El Nino and the cooling phase as La Nina)will likely continue to dominate precipitation patterns from year to year in the tropical Pacific. Climate change-related increases in air temperatures will lead to more evaporation and more moisture in the air. As a result, the variability in El Nino-related precipitation will probably increase, making rainfall predictions difficult. However, it is very likely that warmer temperatures and larger and more frequent tropical stones and hurricanes will affect the Hawaiian Islands in the future. Project design will direct surface runoff into seepage pits of sufficient disposal capacity to accommodate reasonably expected increase in runoff. Due to the elevation of the property at a minimum of 350 feet above sea level,there is no risk to the Proposed Project from sea level rise (Figure 5). Construction of the facilities would involve unavoidable small but non-negligible carbon emissions. Occupation of the housing would entail greenhouse gas emissions that would be essentialIy the same regardless of where the residents live, leading to no net increase. The Proposed Project would not be expected to contribute significantly to global climate change. Page 12 Hale Dla 0 Afohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.1.2 Drainage, Water Features and Water Quality Existing Environment No stream, lakes or other water bodies are present on or near the property. The intermittent Alenaio Stream is approximately 1,500 feet to the north, the main branch of Waiakea Stream is 3,000 feet to the south, and a drainage area associated with the land south of Mohouli Street is about 500 feet to the south (Figure 7). Alenaio Stream empties into the Wailoa River, an estuary that connects to Hilo Bay. Because of the recent lava, no active drainageways are present on the property, and excess rainfall drains directly into the ground. The Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 1551660903F (912912017) shows that the entire project site is in Flood Zone X, outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain (sometimes known as the 500-year floodplain) (Figure 6). Hilo Bay has been struck by several highly destructive tsunami in historic times. Maps printed by the Hawaii County Civil Defense Agency locate the property well mauka of the area that should be evacuated during a tsunami warning. Figure 6. Flood insurance Rate 'flap and Nearby Intermittent Channels ff ' lJ w 4•` • r. q- � --�. -._' ger ~•� �, �,j_ � 'r�4 L �' ' r l Subject , F _ Property pit" , it + f 6._: .-fir' Source: adap(cd from DLNR Flood Insurance Rate Maps al http://gis.ilawaiinlip.orglthat/ Page 13 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Horsing Environmental Assessment Impacts and Miliaation Measures Landclearing and construction activities would occur in an area greater than one acre and thus will require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit to ensure that erosion and sedimentation impacts to adjacent waters will be minimized. Plans submitted as part of the application for this permit and a County grading permit will specify practices to minimize the potential for sedimentation, erosion and pollution of coastal waters. HICDC will ensure that its contractor performs all earthwork and grading in conformance with: (a) "Storm Drainage Standards,"County of Hawaii, October, 1970, and as revised. (b) Applicable standards and regulations of Chapter 27, "Flood Control," and Chapter 10, "Erosion and Sedimentation Control," of the Hawaii County Code. (c) Conditions of an NPDES permit. Chapter 27 and the County's Storm Drainage Standards require that all increases in runoff due to a project's development must be captured and disposed of. Rainfall runoff for the site after development will be calculated by the project engineers using the Storm Drainage Standards. Drainage structures will be designed and constricted to capture and retain the increase in rainfall runoff generated by the development. Drainage structures may include lava sumps, seepage drains, structures not requiring underground injection control permits, and/or drywelis. A typical seepage drain structure has a percolation rate of 2 cubic feet per second (cfs), whereas a typical drywell structure has a percolation rate of G cfs. The type,number and placement of these structures will be determined during final design. 3,1,3 Flora, Fauna and Ecosystems E'xisling E!nvironmew The property was surveyed by Ron Terry, Ph.D-, on portions of three days in December 2020. The objectives of the botanical survey component of the survey were to: 1)describe the vegetation; 2) list all species encountered; and 3)identify the locations of any individual plants of rare, threatened or endangered(RTE) species. Plant species were identified in the field and, as necessary, collected and keyed out in the laboratory. Special attention was given to the possible presence of any federally listed (USFWS 2021)threatened or endangered plant species, although the habitat did not indicate a high potential for their presence. The faunal portion of the survey consisted of visual/auditory faunal surveys bath during and apart from the botanical survey, covering birds, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians. Also considered during the survey was the general value of the habitat for native birds and the Hawaiian hoary bat. The field survey did not include invertebrates,which require highly specialized techniques by entomologists or other taxa experts, because of the general lack of potential RTE invertebrate species. There are no lakes, ponds or intermittent or permanent streams, and thus aquatic fauna would not be present. The vegetation of the property consists primarily of low to medium-stature forest(20-30 feet) dominated by the natives `ohi`a Iehua(Metrosideros polymorpha var. incanoI and the in at-forming fern, uluhe (Dicranopleris linearis). The entire site is also lightly to moderately infested with various invasive trees and shrubs,notably Asian melastoune (Melasto►na eandidr.m) and strawberry guava (P.sidium I'age 14 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment callleianum), with lesser numbers of albizia (falcataria mohiccatia), octopus tree (Schefflera actinophylla), gunpowder tree (Treina orientalis), wax myrtle (Morella cerifcra), Meloehia umhellato, and other non-natives. The interior of the property appears never to have been mechanically disturbed. The roadside fringes of the property are managed for weeds and experience heavy sunlight. They are thus dominated by invasives such as strawberry guava, Crotalaria spp., and a variety of weedy trees, shnibs, herbs and ferns, as shown in the photos in Figure 3, above. Table 1 is a list of species found on the property. `Ohi`a and uluhe are by far the most abundant natives. Two native epiphytes—the whisk fern moa (Psiloluin nudum) and the pakahakaha fern (Lelrisorus thunhergianits)—are scattered but also fairly common. Only a few spindly puki awe (Leptecophvlla tameiaweiae) are present, remnants of hardy shrubs that probably colonized the 1881 lava flow in abundance in the first few decades but have become shaded out with the growth of`ohi`a trees and especially strawberry guava and Asian melastome. The Hawaiian sumac or neneleau(Rhus sanchvicensis), which favors disturbed light gaps, is present in a few locations on the edges of the property, as is the common, almost weedy native herb `uhaloa(Waltheria indica). Of the 51 species detected, six are indigenous (native to the Hawaiian Islands and elsewhere), while only two— `ohi`a and nenel eau--are endemic (found only in the Hawaiian IsIands). Each of the indigenous plants is very common throughout the Hawaiian Islands and elsewhere, and no rare or unusual native plant species were present. One common Polynesian introduction was also present: ti (Cordyline fi•uticosa). During the December 2020 botanical survey and in subsequent dedicated observations, several species of birds, all non-native, were observed: Japanese white-eye(Zosterops japonicus), northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis), spotted dove (Vreptopelia chinensis), zebra dove (Geopelia striata) and house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). The Japanese white-eye was the most abundantly observed bird. A previous (2009)two-day bird survey by ornithologist Phillip Bruner(Appendix F in Hawaii County DPW 2009) of the Fire Administration Complex, directly next door and with the same vegetation, also noted barn owl (Tyco alha) and hwamei (Garrulax cal crus). A subsequent survey of that site by Geometrician Associates in 2020 observed various birds, including three species not noted in the 2009 survey; domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus), common myna (Acridotheres Iristis)and saffron finch (Sicalis flaveola). Additional observations would undoubtedly reveal more species of non-native birds. Although the property is covered with native forest that is only moderately degraded, the low elevation — and thus prevalence of mosquitos and avian malaria—reduces the value of habitat for native birds. One fairly common native bird that is increasingly returning to low elevations after having developed some resistance to this disease that plagues the lowlands is the Hawaii `amakihi (Chlorodrepanis Wrens). This bird was not observed in either 2009 or 2020, but could occasionally be present. The formerly federally-endangered Hawaiian hawk or`to(Buten solitarius)—which remains listed by the State of Hawaii —occurs throughout the island of Hawaii from sea level to 8,530 feet in elevation. Although no hawks were observed the surveys for this project, they are frequently observed in a variety of habitats in the South Hilo District and indeed throughout East Hawaii. They generally prefer `6hi`a forest habitat but are known from both native and non-native forests and even range into farmland and towns to forage. Hawks nest in tall trees within their large territories from early March through the end of September. Most nesting occurs in native `ohi`a trees but non-native trees, including eucalyptus, I'age 15 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment ironwood, mango, coconut palm and macadamia may also be used. The low to medium-stature forest on and around the property does not offer optimal nest sites for Hawaiian hawks. Given this vegetation,there is a small but not negligible possibility that hawks could nest on or near the property. If nests were present on or very near the property, any grading,tree removal or other construction activities might disturb nesting, although the context adjacent to housing and highways somewhat reduces the likelihood of both nests and disturbance potential. As with all of the island of Hawaii, several RTE seabirds may overfly, roost, nest, or utilize resources in the general project area of urban Hilo, including the endangered Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma .5andalichensis), the endangered band-rurnped storm petrel (Oceanodroma casiro), and the threatened Newell's shearwater(PrJJinus auricularis newelli). Although they may fly over various locations in South Hilo on their way to and from mountain nesting Areas and the open ocean, no suitable nesting habitat for any of these seabirds is present in lowland Hilo. The primary cause of mortality in these species in Hawaii is thought to be predation by alien mammalian species at the nesting colonies. Collision with man-made strictures is another significant cause. Nocturnally flying seabirds, especially fledglings on their way to sea in the summer and fail, can become disoriented by exterior lighting. Disoriented seabirds may collide with manmade structures and, if not killed outright, may become easy targets of predatory mammals. The threatened Hawaiian goose or nene(Branto santh4censis)has become very common on many Hawaiian islands and can be found at elevations ranging from sea level to sub-alpine areas above 7,000 feet. Historically, flocks moved between high-elevation feeding habitats and lowland nesting areas. Nests consist of a shallow scrape lined with plant material and down. Breeding pairs usually return to the previous year's nest site, typically in dense vegetation. Nene have an extended breeding season, and nesting may occur in all months except May,June, and July, meaning that even if nene were present then they would not be nesting. The dense forest, lack of water bodies,and absence of grass make the property extremely unsuitable habitat for nene foraging or nesting. It is highly likely that endangered Hawaiian hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereas semotzrs), the only native Hawaiian land mammals, at least occasionally utilize the property for feeding and perhaps roosting. They have been found throughout the island of Hawaii. Bats may forage for flying insects on the property on a seasonal basis and may also roost in trees and large shrubs. Bats are often visible while they are feeding on flying insects near dusk and dawn at various locations around the island of Hawaii. Their presence can also be verified by ultrasound detectors or radar. If a bat is detected during a night's study, this merely indicates that they were present in the area. Determination of bat populations or usage patterns requires much more sophisticated, long term studies. Conversely, the absence of bat detections does not indicate an absence of bats, which may have been absent for only a night, a week, or a season, or may have been present but undetected. No bats were observed in our surveys,which mostly took place in full daylight and did not use any detection equipment. For the purposes of this assessment, it is assumed that Hawaiian hoary bats are present at least some of the time, as they have been frequently seen and detected by ultrasound and radar in young `ahi`a forests. Hawaiian hoary bats are vulnerable to disturbance during the summer pupping season and require special mitigation measures. Page 16 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Only one non-native mammal was observed on the property —a domestic cat(Fe& talus)—although there were also signs of use by feral pigs (Sus scrofa). It is likely that small Indian mongooses (Her pestes a. auropunctatus), mice(Mus spp.), rats (Raltus spp.), and domestic dogs (C'anis f.familiaris) are also sometimes present. None of these alien mammals have conservation value and all are deleterious to native flora and fauna. There are no native terrestrial reptiles or amphibians in Hawaii. No reptiles were seen but there are probably various species of skink(Family: Scincidae)and gecko (Gekkonidae)present. The highly invasive coqui frogs (0eutherodaclylus cogui)was heard chirping at several locations. It is possible that bufo toads (Bufo marinas) and perhaps other amphibians are also present. No invertebrate survey was undertaken as part of the survey, but in general, RTE native invertebrates on the Island of Hawaii tend to be associated with either high-elevation, older substrate rainforests (e.g., various Drosophila); coastal dry shrubland(e.g.,various Hylaeus); the summit of Mauna Kea (Nysius wekiuicola); extremely dry, disturbed `a`a flows (Manduca hlackburnii); or aquatic settings (various Megalagrion). Young, lowland `ohi`a forests are not a likely setting for any threatened or endangered invertebrates. Nonetheless, some of Hawai`i's unique native invertebrates are associated with lava tube and cave ecosystems (Howarth 2002; Mitchell et al 2005). The roots of`ahi`a trees provide energy and nutrients for a rich ecosystem for various native insects. The island of Hawaii has at least 49 obligate, cave/void-adapted species (Slay et al 2018). New underground species are still being found, but information on their distribution and abundance is sparse and difficult to obtain. Although no true cave openings were observed on the property(some may remain hidden in the uluhe), small lava tubes, collapses, voids and cracks are omnipresent in pahoehoe flows such as those that cover the property. Similar habitat is present over many hundreds of square miles on the windward side of the island, and the property does not represent essential habitat for this interesting cave fauna. In summary, it is unlikely that any RTE invertebrates would be expected from this property. Impacts and Miligalion Measures Because of the low elevation as well as the lack of diversity and presence of invasives in the property's vegetation, the Proposed Project would have no significant adverse impacts to native vegetation, RTE species or animal habitat. The following measures will help avoid impacts to RTE fauna: • To minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat, trees taller than 15 feet will not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15), unless bat monitoring studies by a qualified biologist using methods acceptable to regulatory agencies determine that no bat roosting is occurring in the affected area. If bat roosts are found in the affected trees, all iandclearing activity will cease until the expiration of the pupping season. Page 17 Hale 01a 0 Mohozili Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Table I Plant Species Observed on Project Site Scientific Name Family Common Mame Life Form Status* Arundina grmnwifolw Orchidaceac. Bamboo Orchid Herb A Ardisia elli plica M rsinaceae Shoe Button Tree Tree A Ruddleta asialica Buddlciaceae Buddleia Shrub A C anavalica cwhcartica Fabaceae Maunaloa Ville A Ccastille'a at errais Scro hulariaceae Indian Paintbnish Herb A C'hamacensla nicutans Fabaceae Partridge Pea Herb A Otharexrlum s inavutn Verbenacene Fiddlewood Tree A Ousia rosea Clusiaceae Autograph Tree Tree A CoRtWi►te frulicose Agavaceae Ti Shrub PI Crotalaria mican.s Fabaceae Rattlepod Shrub A Crolalaria retosa Fabaceae Rattlepod Shrub A Filic•itun dec•i lens Sa indaceae Fern Tree Tree A O ears tol:stachivs Cv eraceae P crews Herb I Desmodfian ca-anifolnw? Fabaceae Desmodium Shnib A De.smodh an iriflorarm Fabaceae Tick Clover Herb A Dicrano veris finearis Gleicheniaceae Ululic Fern A En ilia ftsber ii Asteraceae Pualele Herb A Era roslis pectinacean Poaccae Carolina Love ass Herb A Hqatis eclinaia Lam iaccae Hv tis Vine A Le pisortts thw7ber iawts Polypodiaceae Pakahakalia Fem I Le teco►laylla lameiameiae Ericaccae Pukiawe Shnib I I_ odivIn 'a yonicull? Schizaeaceae Japanese Climbing Fern Fern A Xfe alh 'rus maximus Poaccae Guinca Grass Herb A Alelastow a cardidwn Melastouiataecae Asian Mclastome Shrub A Mehnis minor► flora Poaccae Molasses Grass Herb A ,Welochia umbellata Sterculiaceac Melochia Tree A ,11elros'ideros ;oll inor alta M rtaceae `Ohi`a Tree E Mimosa pudica Fabaceae Sleeping Grass Herb A Morella ceri era M ricaceaWax M rn.le Tree A Ne.lhrole.►is multi ora Ne hrolc idaceac Sword Fern Fern A Pc►rasericrnlltcs blcalarica Fabaceae A lbizia Tree A Pas pallan c•n►t'rr ata►m Poaceae Hila Grass Herb A Persea americana Lauraceac Avocado Tree A Polvgalapanicnlale Polygalaceae Milkwort Herb A Phahi.s tankervilleae Orchidaceae Chinese Ground Orchid Herb A Phlebodium aureum Polypodiaccae Golden Polypody Fem A 1'hOlanthus debilis Eli horbiaceae Niruri Herb A t'h matn.�nrarsrca.s.�►r.s Polypodiaceae Maile Scented Fem Fein A Poh•gala wnictdaia Polygalaceae Rootbeer Plant Herb A Rvilolaun nudum Psilotaceae Moa Fern Ally 1 Psidium cauleianuin M rtaccae Strawberry Guava Tree A Rhus sandwicensi.s Anacardiaceae Neneleau Sh.nib E .Sacciole is indica Poaceae Glenwood Grass Herb A S otho lords plicala Orchidaccae Mala an Grouncl Orchid Herb A Page 18 Hale Ola O.Whouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Table 1,continued Scientific Name Family Common :dame Life Form Status* .S'rermacoce as.sur ens Rubiaccae Buttonweed Herb A Schef era actino phi°!la Amliaceac Octopus Tree Tree A 5chizachrrimn condensation Poaceae Beardgrass Hei'b A 5tach star heta s . Verbenaceae Jamaican Vervain Hes-b A Thema orieniali.s Ulmaceae Gunpowder Tree Tree A 7-ridaa' prociunbens Asteraceae Coat Buttons Herb A Waliheria indica Malvaccae `Uhaloa Herb I A=Alien E=Endemic I=lndigcnous PI=Polynesian Introdticed. END=Federal and State Listed Endangered Notes:Also observed unknown non-native species in Iridaceac. • To minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks, the applicant will avoid earthmoving within 100 meters of tall trees or any tree cutting during the breeding season for Hawaiian hawks (March through the end of September). If this time period cannot be avoided, the applicant will arrange for a hawk nest search to be conducted by a qualified biologist. If hawk nests are present on or near the project site, all Iandclearing activity will cease until the expiration of the breeding season ■ Outdoor lighting may attract endangered seabirds, which may become disoriented by the lighting, resulting in birds being downed. To avoid potential seabird downing through interaction with outdoor Iighting, no construction or unshielded equipment lighting will be used after dark between dhe months of April and October. All permanent lighting will be kept to minimum necessary levels, with shielded lights so as to lower the ambient glare, in conformance with the Hawaii County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Hawaii County Code Chapter 9, Article 14). Furthermore, all exterior lighting will consist of blue-deficient lighting such as filtered LED lights or amber LED lights, with a Correlated Color Temperature (CCT)of 2740 Kelvin (if available in the State. or 3200 Kelvin if not)_ This will not only reduce the risk that threatened or endangered seabirds may be attracted to and then disoriented by lighting, but will also assist in protecting dark skies. • Although not expected on the site, pre-construction will include another verification that there are no Hawaiian goose or nene($rawa sanc&icensis) individuals or nests that could be disturbed by construction activity. If present, standard minimization measures will be instituted, and construction will not proceed until they have left the area; if necessary, resource agencies will be contacted. In all email of May 19, 2021 (see Appendix 1a), neighboring property resident Tim Keller stated concern that feral pigs, chickens and rats displaced by the loss of habitat would relocate to his yard. However, it is more likely that the conversion from forest to urban uses where feral animals are more easily controlled would reduce the number of feral animals transiting from the property to neighboring residences. An issue for construction in properties with `ahi`a trees has recently surfaced. Two species of fungus called Ceraloevstis hikuohia and C. huliohia produce a disease that is new to science and apparently new to Hawaii --Rapid `Ohi`a Death (ROD) (Hawai`i DOFAW 2017)_ This disease has killed hundreds of thousands of`ohi`a trees across more than 34,000 acres of the Big Island. It was first discovered in Lower Puna. The property contains a number of`ohi`a trees. Projects that harm or relocate `vhi`a trees can spread the disease,and certain mitigation measures are recommended, although it is important to I'age 19 Hale Ola 0 Afohmili Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment recognize that treatment protocols are evolving. The following mitigation protocol is proposed and has been supplied to DOFAW for comment as part of the Draft EA review process: • Prior to clearing the edges of the property, any isolated `ahi`a trees on the boundary will be identified. Any such trees that are not planned for removal on the edges will be protected from disturbance entirely or cut and chipped or buried to ensure that they do not present a ready target for ROD infection that could spread to other trees; • Treat any unavoidable scars on `ohi`a trees that result from clearing to prevent infestation of the fungus; and • Stack all removed `ohi`a trees and dispose of by burying or chipping; do not remove from project site. Decontaminate boots and work tools before and after working in an area with `ohi`a trees. Discussions with the U.S. Forest Service during the Draft EA comment period indicated that ohi`a posts or lumber from local trees may be utilized for construction with proper inspection/treatment fronti certified specialists. HICDC may choose to pursue this option. A final biological concern on the Big Island is related to clearing and the the movement of products such as scrap wood, rock fill and building materials, which can spread of invasive species, particularly little fire ants and coclui frogs. Both are rampant in the general area, although no fire ants were observed on the property itself during field reconnaissance. It is unlikely that fill material will be required to brought in; if so, it will be inspected for fire ants. Any material removed from the site to areas without fire ants or coquis will be inspected, and if necessary, treated. 3.1.4 Air Quality, Scenic Resources and Noise Envirownewal,5elting Air quality in Hilo is generally excellent,although vog from Kilauea volcano is occasionally blown into this part of the island when this volcano is erupting. Even during eruptions, the persistent trade winds keep the project area relatively free of vog for most of the year. Motor vehicles provide another very minor source of air pollution, and combustion-derived air pollution in the entire State of Hawaii is minimal. Hawaii Island, like the rest of the state, meets the standards set by the Clean Air Act{CAA} and State of Hawaii law (HRS Chapter 342B), and is within an attainment area. Ambient concentrations of air pollution are regulated by both federal and State of Hawaii ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The National AA QS, as well as the State standards that are defined in Chapter 11-59 of the Hawaii Administrative Rules, are set at levels that protect public health with a margin of safety, and are subject to periodic review and revision. The property is not an area considered significant for its scenic character in the Hawaii County General Plan, and no other scenic resources exist, aside from the low to medium-stature `ahi`a forest, which has some scenic and open space value (see photographs in Figure 3). Noise on the property is low to moderate and derived mainly frorn motor vehicles on Mohoul1 Street,with very minor noise frorn adjacent residences. I'age 20 Hale Qla 0 Afohouh Affordable Housing Environmental assessment Impacts acid Mitigalion Measures On-site inobi le and stationary construction equipment will emit air pollutants from engine exhaust. The largest of this equipment is usually diesel-powered. Nitrogen oxides emissions from diesel engines can be relatively high compared to gasoline powered equipment, but the standard for nitrogen dioxide is set on an annual basis and is not likely to be violated by short-term construction equipment emissions. Carbon monoxide emissions from diesel engines, on the other hand, are low and should be relatively insignificant compared to vehicular emissions on nearby roadways. Another source of air quality impacts are uncontrolled fugitive dust emissions. State of Hawaii Air Pollution Control Regulations at Chapter 1I- 6D, HA R,prohibit visible emissions of fugitive dust from construction activities at the property boundary, and thus an effective dust contral plan for the project construction phase is essential. In addition, a neighbor has expressed concern about potential dust issues (see email from Tim Keller, Appendix 1 a). Dust will be controlled by the following: • The contractor will establish frequent watering program to keep bare-dirt surfaces in construction areas of the property from becoming significant sources of dust. • If there any particularly dust-prone or dust-sensitive areas, wind screens will be installed. Operationally, the Proposed Project would not measurably affect air quality or itself be subject to air quality effects. During construction, there is potential for minor impacts to noise during construction because of excavation, grading, compressors, vehicle and equipment engine operation, and construction of new infrastructure, impacting nearby sensitive noise receptors on the margins of the development. Mitigation measures will be implemented to avoid or mI111inze noise impacts including limitation of working hours. Operationally,the housing will produce low to moderate noise levels typical of multi-family housing. The increase in vehicular traffic from residents,visitors, and onsite work-related traffic operation of the facility will slightly increase traffic noise. All increases are expected to be modest and in a context of already moderate levels. No exceedances of DOH's "maximum permissible" property-line noise levels would be expected. In terms of noise impacts to future residents from adjacent uses, the Fire and Police Dispatch Center is likely to have completed construction before affordable rental housing residents move in. The operating facility will not generate any substantial noise and will not impact the affordable rental housing units. Aside from this, adjacent property is all zoned for agriculture but currently utilized as large-lot residences and would not constitute a source of nuisance noise. The removal of the law to medium-stature `6hi`a forest and conversion to multi-family housing involves some loss of open space and scenery. The project will, however, match the urbanization of the general area that is occurring up and down the north side of Mohouli Street from Komohana Street to Kukuau Street, including several senior housing facilities,the Fire and Police Dispatch Center, and the Sunrise Estates subdivision. No impacts to scenic areas identified in the Hawaii County General Plait would occur. Page 21 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.1.5 Hazardous Substances,Toxic Waste and Hazardous Conditions A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA)was conducted for the property site by Myounghce Noll and Associates (MNA). The Phase I ESA is attached to this EA as Appendix 4. A Phase I ESA aims to identify recognized environmental conditions (REC}that exist on or near the property and have the potential to impact the project site. The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that indicates an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release into structures on the site or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the site. The Phase I ESA included site reconnaissance, interviews with land owners and managers, and research using a variety of State and federal databases. No RECs were identified. No RECs were noted during historic aerial photograph or topographic map review, and site reconnaissance in October and November, 2016 found no indication of illegal dumping or other RECs. One propane aboveground storage tank(AST) was located on a property to the west. The AST was in good condition, and there was no stressed vegetation, and therefore, the AST is not considered a REC. Records indicated two hazardous waste sites, one current and one former, located 3/¢ mile away from the subject property: 600 Wailoa Street,where the Lanakila Homes Phase 3B-4 site was identified as having heavy metal and lead contaminated soils and is managed with controls. Due to the distance of this site from the property, it is not considered a REC. At a location on Kaumana Drive there had been a HELLO Pale-Mounted Transformer No. 20938 at Pole No. 7. It was identified as having petroleum contamination in the soil. The contaminated soil was removed, and a No Further Action letter was Issued on .lune 5, 2012. Due to the distance of this site from the property, this is not considered an REC. State and federal records were searched, and no records were identified for the property of National Priorities List(NPL) sites, federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)CORRACTS (RCRA Facilities that are undergoing"corrective action") and Non-CORRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted NPL sites, federal or state Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) sites, federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Punned(NFRAP)sites, landfill or solid waste disposal sites, State Leaking Underground Storage Tank(UST) list sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sites, Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) list sites, or federal or State Brownfields sites. Impacts grad Mitigation Measures No impacts would be expected as the site is properly prepared for the project and the Housing facilities are constructed. Although it is unlikely that any potentially hazardous, toxic or radioactive material would be found on the property, reasonable precautions would be undertaken by the applicant and its contractors in the context of the project construction Best Management Practices for the appropriate response and remediation should any hazardous, toxic, or radioactive material be encountered during construction. Page 22 Hale Ola 0 Mohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.2 Socioeconomic and Cultural 3.2.1 Socioeconomic Characteristics The Proposed Project would provide much-needed affordable rental housing for the residents of Hilo and vicinity. Population as measured in the 2010 U.S. Census (the most recent U.S. census)for Hilo, a Census Designated Place (CCD), was 43,263 (U-S. Census Bureau 2010a). Table 2 provides information on the socioeconomic characteristics of the State of Hawaii, the County of Hawaii, and Hilo CDP, from the U.S. Census Bureau. The great majority of the population in Hilo is non-white, and it is one of the tnost diverse populations in the U.S. Hilo also skews slightly elderly coin pared to the State as a whole. Other areas of the County are older, but a large portion of this population, particularly in West Hawaii, is retired Mainland immigrants. Several segments of the population that typically exhibit disadvantaged measures of social welfare are disproportionately represented in the population of Hilo as compared to the State of Hawaii. Median family income is much less than the State as a whole. More than 17 percent of individuals have income below the poverty level, almost double the statewide rate. Similar patterns hold for households receiving welfare, food stamps, and disability payments. Table 2. Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics Description State of Ha►vai`i County of Hawaii Hilo CDP Total Population 1,360,301 185,079 43.263 Median age {years) 37.2 40.9 40.5 Total housing units 519,508 82,324 15,483 Older than 55 years 19.0% 21.9% 20.3% Median Household Incomez S81,275 552,409 S63,283 Individuals below poverty level'- 9.3% 13.1% 17.1% Race and Hispanic Origin White alone 24.7% 33.7% 19.7% Black or African American 1.5% 0.5% 0.8% American Indian or Alaska Native 0.3% 0.5% 0.1% Asian alone 38.6% 22.2% 32.4% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 5.9% 8.5% 10.3% Two or More Races 23.5% 29.5% 32.0% Hispanic or Latino of any race 8.9% 11.6% 11.8% Source: U.S.Census Bureau 2(110a,2010b•and 2010c 'Source: U.S.Census Bureau 2019 `Estimates for CCDs luive a high margin of error due to small population and sample size. .Impacts and Mitigation Measures The Proposed Project is not expected to affect population size or demographics. Having adequate affordable rental housing is critically important for promoting a healthful and socially just environment for the population of Hilo and East Hawaii. The primary impact on socioeconomic conditions would be to provide much-needed affordable rental housing for the residents of Hilo. As discussed in Section 1.1, Page 23 Hale Qla 0 Afohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment HICDC has submitted a State Land Use Boundary Amendment to reclassify the property to the State Land Use Urban District and intends to utilize the Section 201 H, HRS process to exempt the current County zoning to obtain a zoning of RM4 (multi-family residential, 4,000 square feet minimum per building site). This extends a cluster of affordable multi-family housing from an area rnakai and is compatible with nearby uses,which are primarily single-family residential uses. Maps and a detailed discussion of consistency with land use designations is contained in Section 3.6. Along with those beneficial social effects, motorists, pedestrians and bicyclists on Mohouli Street may experience slightly greater traffic, and residents within the agriculturally zoned residential lots of Kukuau Street may be slightly impacted through having a multi-family housing as neighbors in area that previously was forested and had no active human use. In response to concerns expressed by adjacent residents during early development phases of the proposal, the applicant will build a fence within the portion of the property that abuts the Kukuau Street lots in order to reduce access and visual concerns. 3.2.2 Cultural Resources This section utilizes a variety of previous studies concerning Hilo and more specifically Waiakea Ahupua`a (in which the property is located), particularly McEldowney (1979), Kelly (198 1) and Maly (1996), as well as the archaeological survey prepared for the site (Appendix 3). Traditional Cultural Backgs•ound The earliest historical knowledge of Hilo comes from legends written by Kamakau(1961) of a 16`1' century chief'Um i-a-LiIoa (son of LIIoa), who at that time ruled the entire island of Hawaii. Descendants of Urn and his sister-wife were referred to as "Kona"chiefs, controlling Ka`u, Kona, and Kohala, while descendants of Umi and his Maui wife were "Hilo" chiefs, controlling Hamakua, Hilo, and Puna (Kelly 1981:1). According to Kamakau(1961), both sides fought over control of the island, desiring access to resources such as feathers, wamaki taps, and canoes on the Hilo side, and wauke tapa, and warm lands and waters on the Kona side (c.f Kelly 1981:3). Kepa Maly (1996) conducted historical research for the lands of Wainaku, Ponahawai, Waiakea,and Pi`ihonua. He evaluated the significance of the use of the Hawaiian word wai in the place names: Ponahawai, Waiakea, Wainaku, and Wailuku (River). According to Maly,the word wai(water)has strong metaphorical associations with the Hawaiian concept of wealth (waiwai), stressing its cultural importance (Maly 1996:A-2). In this context, the importance of Hilo can be better understood, with its copious streams that fed taro pondfields and its numerous fishponds. Sometime near the end of the 16t1' century or early in the 17"' century, the lands of Hilo were divided into ahupua'a, which till today retain their original naives (Kelly 1981:3). These include the ahulma`a of Pu`u`eo, Pi`ihonua, Punahoa, Ponahawai Kukuau and Waiakea(where the property is located). The design of these land divisions was such that residents could have access to all that they needed to live, with ocean resources at the coast, and agricultural and forest resources in the interior. However, only Pi`ihonua and Waiakea provided access to the full range of resources stretching from the sea up to 6,000 feet along the slopes of Mauna Kea(Kelly 1981:5). ]'age 24 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Waiakea, which translates as "broad waters" (Pukui et at. 1976:220) is home to the Wailoa River and portions of Hilo, Reed's, Kuhio, and Pu-hi Bays. Historically, the ocean resources of Hilo Bay were vital to everyday subsistence. Kamakau describes various fishing techniques as follows: "... with basket traps; with hook and line... by drugging. A man could also fish with his hands, or with crab or shrimp nets, or with a pole from a ledge or the seashore or catch fish in tide pools with a scoop net, or go along the seashore with a net, or set a fishline, or search for fish with a small basket trap or draw a net over sandy spots in the sea or up onto the shore; or drive fish into nets by splashing; or with a pole. But these were not expert ways of fit shing, they were just for the taking of fish to make living more pleasurable..." (Kamakau 1976:59-60 cited in Kelly etas. 1981:16-17), Marine-based subsistence was also strongly linked to social organization. Strict kapil were enforced, which dictated when and where certain varieties of fish such as 'apehi and akin could be caught. A dedicated akar fishing ground or ko`a known as Maka-o-Ku was Iocated on the shore of the Waiakea peninsula, near present day Coconut Island(Maly 1996). Theoretically, access rights to fishing areas and ocean resources were defined by ahupua`a boundaries,with residents of a specific ahipua`a only taking fish within their own land division. However, in the case of Waiakea Ahupua`a, the Waiakea fishery extended straight across Hilo Bay, allowing residents of the adjacent ahupaia`a only limited rights in the fishery (Kelly et al. 1981). Extensive fishponds were developed in the vicinity of Hilo Bay, including the royal fishponds, five spring-fed inland ponds whose yield was reserved solely for the highest of all`i. The largest of these royal ponds, known as Waiakea, was located a mile southwest of the property in the Wailoa River. Religious ritual accompanied the creation and maintenance of the royal ponds, which according to a historic account from 1823,were surrounded by small huts for their caretakers (Kelly et al. 1981). In addition to marine resources, farming was essential to the residents of Waiakea. Wet taro was cultivated on mounds built into the existing marshlands along the Wailoa River behind the sand dunes of Hilo Bay using the kipikipi method, which made a landscape of raised islands and ditches (Maly 1996). According to historical accounts in by Handy and Handy (19 72) dry taro was planted wherever there was enough soil on the lava fields of Waiakea and on the slopes between the rivers. Past-European Contact Captain George Vancouver, an early European explorer who met with Kamehameha I at Waiakea in 1794, recorded that Kamehameha was there preparing for his invasion of the neighbor islands, and that Hilo was an important center because his Peleleu fleet of 800 canoes were being built there(Moniz n.d.; Tolleson 2001). The people of Hilo had long prepared for Kamehameha's arrival and collected a large number of hogs and a variety of plant foods to feed the ruler and his retinue. Kelly et al. (198 1) surmised that the people of Hilo had actually prepared for a year prior to Kamehameha's visit and expanded their fields into the open lands behind Hilo to accommodate the increased number of people who would be present. It was during this early Historic Period that Waiakea Ahupua`a became part of Kamehameha I's personal land holdings (Moniz n.d.). Page 25 Hale Ola 0 Alobouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment In addition to providing valuable subsistence resources, the protected waters and sandy shores of Hilo Bay offered a calm and safe landfall for ships involved in whaling and the sandalwood trade. The sandalwood trade was initiated in the 1790s but did not become successful until 1812; Karnehameha held the monopoly on the trade and oversaw its management by his chiefs until his death. Thereafter, King Liholiho's favored chiefs mismanaged the trade, which Iead to the depletion of the forests and the end of the sandalwood trade by 1830 (Kelly et al 1981). According to Kelly et al. (1981), historic accounts about whaling suggest that Hilo Bay was not a preferred port for the whalers due to the inissionary influence and the resultant lack of liquor and women; sailors preferred Honolulu and Lahaina as parts-of-call. At the end of the 1830s, industrial development was on the rise in Hilo, despite the decline in whaling and the end of the sandalwood trade. In a letter written in 1840, Reverend Titus Coati remarked on the conditions in Hilo: "Industry is increasing. Our ports and places of trade begin to put on the air of activity and life. Temporal improvements and comforts are fast increasing at Hilo,that is, near the station. Two stores of goods are opened here, and three sugar-mills have recently gone into operation near us. Sugar-cane is being planted to a considerable extent; business assumes more tone and energy, and many of the people are approximating towards industry and competence. Probably the amount of cloth worn by the people has increased ten or twenty fold during four years past. Labor is in better demand and wages are rising continually" (Kelly et. al.1981:49). A period of great socia-political change began with the arrival of the first missionaries to Waiakea in 1824, culminating in 1848 with the formai land division known as the Great Xfahele. The introduction of new spiritual concepts combined with an increased involvement in international trade and global politics led to a shift in settlement patterns from traditionally dispersed Hawaiian villages to more concentrated urban population centers. A fateful event occurred on the evening of November 7, 1837, when a large tsunami hit Hilo Bay. Reverend Coan described the scene as follows: we heard a heavy sound as of a falling mountain Moon the beach. This noise was followed by loud wailing and cries of distress, extending for miles around the shores of the bay... House furniture, calabashes, fuel, timber, canoes, food, clothing, everything floated wild upon the flood. The waters rushed up valleys, carried away fish-ponds, and swept over many plantations of food" (Maly 1996:18). After the tsunami, Hilo underwent a major religious revival that lasted from 1837 until 1840 and included mass conversions and meetings of up to 10,000 worshippers. Other events that had a profound effect on the demography of Hilo was the measles epidemic of 1848, which claimed one third of the population of the island, followed by an outbreak of smallpox in 1853; later outbreaks of plague and leprosy caused the population to dwindle further(McEldowney 1979). Pressure from foreign investors, combined with the above-described demographic and socioeconomic changes, resulted in a shift from traditional land tenure to a system of private land ownership that culminated in the formal land division known as the Udhele `Aina or Great Yahele of 1848_ During the llfkahele `Ain a all the lands of Hawaii were classified into one of three categories: Crown Lands (for the I'age 26 Hale nla 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment occupant of the throne), Konohiki Lands (to be divided among 245 chiefs) and Government Lands. Conditions of the Aldhele `Jhia also afforded native tenants the right to claim, and acquire title to, parcels that they actively lived on or cultivated for a living(Maly 1996). These kuleana claims were essentially transfers of ownership from the all`i tool (high chief) or konohiki(lesser chief/overseer), who had been awarded ownership of the ahiepzra`a by Kamehameha III, to the commoners. The Board of Commissioners oversaw the program and administered the kideana as Land Commission Awards (LCAw.). Historically,the entire ahupua`a of Waiakea was treated as personal land by Kamehameha I, who then passed it on to his son Liholiho. Waiakea was later inherited by chiefess Kaunuohua, a grand-daughter of Keawemauhili and kahu of Alexander Liholiho(Kame`eleihiwa 1992), who later relinquished the ahielma a during the Mahele `Rina. As a result of the Mahele, Waiakea Ahupua`a was set aside as Crown Lands for Kamehameha III. In addition, twenty-six kuleana claims were registered within Waiakea for house lots and cultivation. Most were located along major inland roads or fishponds near Hilo Bay, (Devereux et. al. 1997; Moniz n.d.). No kuleana were located on or near the property. Waiakea and the Heyday of Sugar Care Following the Mdhele, the population of Hilo grew and the scattered upland habitations gave way to sugar cultivation (McEldowney 1979;37). In Waiakea, Kamehameha IV leased large portions of Waiakea to outside interests for pasture and sugar cane cultivation (Moniz 1992). In 1861 S. Kipi leased the Crown Lands of Waiakea for the rate of$600 dollars per year to be used as pasture for five years (Kelly et al. 1981; Maly 1996). In 1874 the first lease for sugar cane cultivation in Waiakea was granted to Rufus A. Lyman for a term of 25 years. The lease granted him all the privileges of the land including the use of the fishponds and the cutting of firewood (Maly 1996). This lease was eventually transferred to the Waiakea MiII Company, founded by Alexander Young and Theo H. Davis,and the Waiakea Sugar Plantation was established in 1879. The Waiakea Mill Company started with about 350 acres of cultivated lands they had acquired from Lyman. In 1888 the company acquired a 30-year lease that increased their land holdings in Waiakca Ahupua`a. When the lease ran out in 1918, the acreage under cultivation had increased to nearly 7,004; but without a lease the ahupzea`a fell under the homesteading laws, which required the government to lease the land to individual growers. Waiakea Mill Company was expected to grind the crop for the independent growers under a contract that gave the company 40 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the refined sugar. Contractual and legal problems, combined with a declining sugar market and the devastating tsunaini of 1946, led the Waiakea Mill Company to cease operation in 1947, and offer its property under General Lease 2741 to private cultivators for the purpose of growing cane (Maly 1996). During its 68 years of operation, the Waiakea Mill Company was a major force in shaping the economic and social growth of Hilo, and certainly Ieft its mark on both the cultural and physical landscapes of the area. A plantation railroad system connected the sugar cane fields with the mill at Wailoa Stream, about a half mile southwest of the property. The railroad in Hilo was in operation from 1899 until 1946. The railroad's primary business centered on the transport of raw sugar from the miffs to the harbor and hauling plantation freight while the transport of passengers was merely a secondary interest. On April 18, 1899 the Republic of Hawaii and the Hilo Railroad Company (HRC)reached an agreement for the HRC to I'age 27 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment "build and operate a railroad in,from between and through the districts of Hilo, Puna, Hamakua, KohaIa, Kona, and Kau" (Kelly et al. 1981:343). This rather liberal agreement granted the following to the HRC, subject to the approval of the Mini ster of the lrtteri or: Government lands for the HRC to build their stations, depots and other structures; a free right of way across Government Lands and roads; and free use of water for the construction of the railroad (Kelly et at. 1981). Six experienced Honolulu businessmen who hoped to recreate their success on Oahu in the cultivation and transport of sugar cane were behind the HRC venture on the island of Hawaii. In the fall of 1899,the HRC began building its tracks from its terminus in Waiakea 8.3 miles south to the 01 aa Sugar Company Mill near Kea`au, Puna District(Kelly et al. 1981). The investors behind the HRC chose this route as their first rail service because they were also backing the Olaa Sugar enterprise. Interestingly, die first product transported by rail from Olaa Sugar Company was not sugar,but rather timber that had been recently cleared from forests in the area and supplied to the HRC as 35,000 railroad ties (Kelly et al 1981). In 1900, a small wharf was constructed along the eastern bank of the Wailoa River for the landing of material necessary to build the tracks, buildings and railroad cars. The first locomotive made landfall on May 15, 1900, and rail service from Hilo to Kea`au began on June 18, 1900. The Wailoa River railroad wharf was expanded in 1901 and a large warehouse was built to store up to 15,000 bags of sugar(Kelly et al 1981). By the end of 1901, HRC had completed construction of more than 35 miles of railroad Iine, which included 25.1 miles from Waiakea to Kapoho and a 5-mile branch to Pahoa. In 1902, a new sugar warehouse, with a 35,000 bag capacity, was built on the eastern shore of the Wailoa River. In 1903, a new railroad wharf was built north of the mouth of the Wailoa River in Hilo Hay and the railroad fine from Waiakea to Hilo Town was completed, including two bridges over the Wailoa River. The HRC ran mostly deficits during 1901-1905, but the advent of trans-Pacific steamship service in Hilo Bay promised to make the venture profitable. In 1906, the HRC directors paid to put together a proposal to construct a breakwater in order to accommodate the steamships and presented it to the U.S. Ann Corps of Engineers. The HRC was able to secure the appropriation for the breakwater in 1907 by making assurances to the U.S. government that they would construct a railroad north of Hilo, in addition to wharf facilities (Kelly et al. 1981). Breakwater construction began in 1908 and the HRC hauled most of the rock from Puna to Hl❑for the breakwater project, which compensated for the decline in the sugar industry and resulted in increased revenue for the years 1908-1910. From 1909 to 1913,the HRC laid track from Hilo northward to the district of Hamakua and southward through Puna. This expansion was funded by $4.5 million worth of stocks and bonds with annually rising interest rates that the HRC could not afford to pay. The HRC's failure to meet their bond interest obligations resulted in foreclosure in 1916. Later that year, the Hilo Railroad Company was reorganized as the Hawaii Consolidated Railway (HCR) under the leadership of businessmen who represented the companies that ran the sugar plantations along the railroad. Hilo's railroad history helped shape much of the economic activity and land use of East Hawaii, but did not leave any traces on or near the property. Existing Cullur-al Resources and Practices The property consists of a low to medium-stature, moderately degraded `ohi`a forest on a geologically recent (188 1) lava flow. It does not contain many natural features that might be important in gathering or ritual, such as caves, springs,pu`u, etc,, although the `olli`a trees could provide some gathering resources Page 28 Hale Ola 0 hfohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment and have symbolic value. In general,with the possible exception of`ohi`a, the vegetation does not contain the quality and quantity or resources that would be important for native gathering. The location about a mile away from the setting for the historical events of Hilo associated with royal residences.battles and visits, fishponds and intensive farming, and sugarcane mills and railroads—particularly considering that the entire surface of the area was covered by lava in the 1881 eruption—avoids association with significant cultural sites. The property does not currently support any known traditional resource uses. Archaeological studies (most relevantly, Appendix 2), cultural studies of Waiakea(e.g., Maly 1992), and consultation with DHA and neighbors during the EA early consultation process did not indicate any cultural sites or practices. Cultural Resources:Impacts and Mitigation Measures The Proposed Project will not have an adverse effect on any cultural resources or practices.The site currently has no uses and few resources. Cultural use of lehua and liko from the `ohi`a,which is more or less on hold currently because of concerns about Rapid `Ohi`a Death,would not be affected, because there is abundant`ohi`a in the forests above Hilo that is protected by its status within the Conservation District. There do not appear to be any valued cultural, historical, or natural resources on the property, and no known exercise of traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights. Therefore,no such resources would be affected or impaired by the proposed action, and there is no need for any action for bodies approving land use designation changes or other discretionary approvals to take measures to reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs, State Historic Preservation Division, and other parties were supplied a link to the Draft EA, which has also been made available to agencies and the general public, in order to help finalize this finding. No party reviewin« theDraft EA suonlied any cultural information. 3.2.3 Archaeology and Historic Properties The entire parcel is completely covered by pahoehoe lava from the 1880 to 1881 flow. Any historic properties that may have been present were covered and destroyed in 1881 due to the complete coverage and tbickness of the lava flow. Since 1881, the property has grown shrubs and then trees but has never been used for fanning, grazing or other activities. Two prior archaeological studies have been conducted in the immediate vicinity of the property, neither of which identified any historic properties. An archaeological field inspection was completed for the property on August 6, 2020 (Appendix 3). The field inspection found no historic properties of any kind. The recommended determination of effect for the proposed project was "no historic properties affected." The field inspection report was submitted in January 2021 to the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) for review as part of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment permit process, pursuant to Chapter 6E, Hawai`i Revised Statutes. By letter of January 15, 2021 (see Appendix 3), SHPD concurred with the findings of the inspection. I'age 29 Hale Dia 0 AIohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.3 Infrastructure 3.3.1 Utilities and Public Services Existing Facilities and Services Electrical power to the site is supplied by Hawaiian Electric, a privately owned utility company, via its island-wide distribution network, with poles and lines on Mohouli Street. Telephone and cable TVIInternet service are available from Hawaiian Telcom and Spectrum Cable. There is a 12-inch waterline fronting the property within the Mohouli Street right-of-way and also a 12- inch line within the Kupuna Street right-of-way. The project would connect both lines through the property and provide ample fire flow. The Department of Neater Supply (DWS)has indicated that water will be avaiIabte for the project and has provided conditions for granting a water commitment(see letter of June 10,2021 in Appendix 1 a). In keeping with recommendations provided by the State Commission on Water Resources Management(see letter of May 19, 2021 in Appendix la), information about the project has been supplied to the PIanning Department and DWS for incorporation into the County's Water Use and Development Pian; water efficient practices and fixtures are an integral part of project design; storrnwater will be handled appropriately onsite; landscape irrigation will be minimal, because of die climate of the area; and water uses will be calculated by an engineer to ensure adequate evaluation of the project's impact upon water use and resources. No impact to public trust water would be expected. Wastewater will be conveyed to the County wastewater system by installation of a sewer line along the north property lines of parcels TMK: 2-4-1: 176 and 177 that will tie into the sewer manhole on parcel 177. Drainage improvements will consist of swales and underground connections to drywelts that will be spaced within the property to capture project generated nun-off. Solid waste will be collected on site and removed periodically by private haulers. Medical, government, social service, and recreational services and facilities are located nearby at various locations within central Hilo. Impacts and Miiigalion Measures All necessary utilities and services are available for the project. No adverse inmpact upon the ability of the utilities to supply services is expected. No adverse effect to medical, government, social service, and recreational services would occur as a result of the housing, which is expected to be occupied almost entirely with existing East Hawaii residents who already utilize such services. In summary, the Proposed Project would require extension and upgrade of existing facilities but would not have any substantial impact on existing utilities or public services. Page 30 Hale Qla 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 3.3.2 Roadways and Traffic A Traffic Impact Assessment Report(TZAR) for the Proposed Project was conducted by AECOM Technical Services, Inc. The report is attached as Appendix 2 and summarized below. Existing Facilities As shown in Figure 4, the proposed facility's access is via an easement over parcel 24-001:176 to the intersection of Kupuna Place at Mohouli Street,which currently provides access to the Mohouli Senior Residences and the Adult Day Center. Kupuna Place intersects Mohouli Street at an unsignaiized "T"- intersection with STOP-sign control on the Kupuna Place leg of the intersection. Vehicles turning in and out of Kupuna Place are fully accommodated. The Kupuna Place approach is configured with a single lane, although there is sufficient width so that right-turning and left-turning vehicles can move concurrently. There is a refuge in dhe painted Mohouli Street median for vehicles turning left out of Kupuna Place onto Mohouli Street. The eastbound Mohouli Street approach is a single-lane approach with a median left-turn lane for traffic turning into Kupuna Place.The westbound Mohouli Street approach is configured with a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. There are no sidewalks along Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street, but the wide, paved shoulders are used by pedestrians as sidewalks and by bicyclists as bike lanes. There are sidewalks along the internal roadways within the Mohouli Senior Residences, including on Kupuna Place. There are no crosswalks across the approaches at the Kupuna PIacelMohout i Street intersection. At this time, the property is not served by fixed public transit routes. Major streets of interest in the area include Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, and Kukuau Street. These streets alt function to transmit traffc from the nzauka neighborhoods of Hilo back and forth to the major centers of downtown Hilo and Waiakea. Impacts and All igation Measures Hale Ola 0 Mohouli will add up to 90 affordable residential units utilizing Kupuna Place at Mohouli Street as the primary access. This intersection currently provides access to 184 residential units at the Mohouli Senior Residences as well as Adult Day Center. It will also provide access for the Fire and Police Dispatch Center, which will soon be in construction according to the Hawaii County Department of Public Works (DPW). Traffic from all three facilities must be considered —along with the natural growth in traffic in the general area—in order to evaluate the perfonnance of this intersection in the future. The additional traffic from Hale Ola 0 Mohouli may also have some impact on other intersections in the area, particularly the nearby ones of Mohouli Street at Komohana Street, and Mohouli Street at Kukuau Street. To calculate effects, traffic data was collected and analyzed from each of these intersections. Vehicular turning movement, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were conducted at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection during several AM and PM peak traffic periods in October 2020. Potentially atypical conditions due to COVID-19 related restrictions necessitated use of alternative methods for establishing base condition traffic volumes. Base traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana I'age 31 Hale nla 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Street and the Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections were obtained from a 2011 TIAR for the first increments of senior housing. State Department of Transportation (H DOT) link traffic volumes on Mohouli Street and on Komohana Street for years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were obtained and used to adjust the traffic turning movement counts to an estimate of what the base traffic volumes would be without the effects of COVID-19. These HDOT counts were also used to help estimate future ambient traffic growth rates. Details of the traffic analysis are found in Appendix 2. In summary,the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development is projected to generate 48 vehicles per hour(vph) during the AM peak hour with 14 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68 vph, with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. The additional generated traffic is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations at the intersections in the vicinity. Assisting in reducing traffic impacts to minimal levels is a proposed driveway at the mauka end of the property, which will be restricted to right-in/right- out movements. This will help handle many inbound trips and also trtauka-bound outbound trips, and will reduce the number of vehicles entering and existing at Kupuna Place(see Figure 3). The existing roadway infrastructure would be able to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development. The TZAR recommended the following improvements: ■ Implement the proposed riglit-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street. As part of the implementation, restripe part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right- turn only lane into the Hale Ola O Mohouli development. This recommendation is carried through in the design Qfthe facility and will be coordinated with the Hawai'i County DPW. Assure that future major developments occurring in the area with traffic impacts to the segment of Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street provide an evaluation of traffic signal warrants for the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. The Hawai'i County DPW has been tasked through Special Permit conditionsfor Fite and Police Dispatch Center to regularly monitor tra#Ic in this area and particularly at the intersection afMohouli Street and Kupuna Place. With these improvements and monitoring, no significant traffic impacts would be expected to occur. The Hawaii County Police Department provided an initial review of the project during early consultation and wrote a letter of April 28, 2021 (see Appendix la) indicating no comments at this time. They have been provided a link to the Draft EA. In an email of May 19, 2021 (see Appendix I a), neighboring property resident Tim Keller stated concern that having a right-inlright out naauka driveway to the housing complex would funnel traffic west onto Mohouli and then north onto Kukuau Street, increasing the traffic in his neighborhood because of motorists bound to makai destinations in Hilo. While it is likely that some maukc►-bound traffic will exit the mauka driveway, effects to Kukuau Street are unlikely. The absence of a signal on Kukuau Street at Komohana Street, and the presence of a signal at Mohouli Street, makes it counterintuitive to utilize a roundabout route through Kukuau Street to access tnakai destinations in Hilo, Therefore, no significant increase in traffic to Kukuau Street between Mohouli Street and Komohana Street is thus expected. Page 32 Hale nla 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental assessment 3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts The Proposed Project will not involve any substantial secondary or cumulative impacts, such as population changes or effects on other public facilities. HICDC expects that the great majority of residents of Hale Ola O Mohouli will be existing residents on the Island of Hawaii, and likely East Hawaii, based on the substantial local need and previous affordable housing projects. The jobs generated by constriction and maintenance of the facility are very tikely to be filled by local labor. Thus, no significant net influx of population to East Hawaii would be expected. Traffic can be considered a secondary impact of facility development, and it has been fully evaluated through a Traffic Impact Assessment Report(TIAR), as discussed above in Section 3.3.2. Cumulative impacts result when implementation of several projects that individually have limited impacts combine to produce more severe impacts or conflicts in mitigation measures. The Proposed Project will have very limited and temporary construction period impacts, such as noise, traffic, dust and sedimentation. Three other projects are known to be in planning in the vicinity. Directly adjacent is the Fire and Police Dispatch Center,which, as previously discussed, the Hawaii County DPW expects will soon be in construction. About 1,000 feet away on the land extending from the current terminus of Ponahawai Street between Komohana and the Mohouli Streets is the proposed Wailani mixed-use project. In planning since 2009, and scheduled to begin construction soon, the residential/commercial project is situated on a 171-acre parcel of land between Komohana Street and Mohouli Street. The design, which has varied widely over the decade of planning, currently calls for up to 700 residential units and a maximum commercial floor space of 420,000 square feet. Ponahawai Street would be extended to Mohouli Street to deal with traffic, and streets would have curbs, gutters and sidewalks to provide an urban and walkable feel. Finally, a Portuguese Cultural Center is planned for the corner of Komohana and Ponahawai Streets. The roughly 6,000 square foot facility would serve as a museum, performance space and dining hall and would also include a garden and stone oven. Fundraising is underway, but the tinning of construction is currently not set. The scale of the project has recently been downsized. During construction, there is at least a small potential for noise,traffic and dust impacts from the four projects to acccumulate, under the scenario of two or more more being constructed at dhe same time. These impacts are mitigable and can be handled by construction-phase measures that can easily be implemented by the Hawaii County DPW in coordination with the HICDC and other parties involved in construction. As discussed above, permanent traffic levels on Mohouli and Komohana Street would clearly rise as a result of all four projects —with mast attributable to the Wal Ian 1 project—but would be Iargely mitigated by the built-in mitigation of the extension of Ponahawai Street to Mohouli Street. Traffic impacts would not be severe and level of service would remain acceptable. 3.5 Required Permits and Approvals The following permits and approvals would be required: • State Land Use District Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban by Windward !Tanning Commission and Hawai`i County Council • 201H Exemption of County Zone(Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council) ■ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit(State DOH) Page 33 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment • Grading, Grubbing and Driveway Pennits (County DPW) ■ Building Permits and Plan Approval (County DPW and Planning) 3.6 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies 3.6.1 Hawaii State Plan Adopted in 1978 and last revised in 1991 (Hawai`i Revised Statutes, Chapter 226, as amended), the Plan establishes a set of themes, goals, objectives and policies that are meant to guide the States long-run growth and development activities. The three themes that express the basic purpose of the Hawai`i State Plan are individual and family self-sufficiency, social and economic mobility and community or social well-being. Tlie Proposed Project would promote these goals by providing affordable rental housing, thereby enhancing quality-of-life, self-sufficiency, and community, economic and social well-being. 3.6.2 Hawaii State Land Use Law Chapter 205 HRS classifies all land in the State of Hawai`i into one of four land use categories—Urban, Rural, Agricultural, or Conservation. The property is currently in the State Land Use Agricultural District (Figure 7a). HICDC has filed a petition with the County of Hawaii to reclassify the property to the Urban District. The process will involve a public hearing before the Windward Planning Commission, which will provide a recommendation to the Hawaii County Council,which must pass an Ordinance to amend the District Boundary. The State Land Use Boundary Amendment request is in conformance with the appropriate standards. A brief summary of conformance to standards related to effects on the health and safety of the general public, as expressed in Chapter 15-15, HRS, Section 18, follows: It shall include lands characterized by "city-like" concentrations of people, structures, streets, urban level of services and other related land uses; it shall take into consideration the following specific factors: • Proximity to centers of trading and employment except where the development would generate new centers of trading and employment. Discussion: The property is within the developed area of Hilo. In the immediate vicinity there are hundreds ofresidential units to the north, and east, including the Sunrise E.stateslPidge residential subdivisions. Furthermore, the LUPAG Map designation gfMedhim Density Urban supports the requested State Land Use Designalion. • Availability of basic services such as schools, parks, wastewater systems, solid waste disposal, drainage, water transportation systems, public utilities, and police and fire protection; and sufficient reserve areas for foreseeable urban growth. Page 34 Hale Ola 0 Alohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Figure 7. Land Use Designations of Property and Vicinity 7a. State Land Use District Hilo ` �.�r.i„• URBAN r r - r Property S� s AGRICULTURAL Source: Land Use Commission. Ittlps:i,lttc.liawaii. o? v/maps/l itid-ttsc-district-bot>_ndary-maps/state-of-ltawaii-land-rise-district- boundaries-maul Acc. 7121.Note: not all recently approved amendments are depicted in the map. 7b. Coun Zoning .� — + � A Agriculture RM Multi-family (( RS Single-family ' =- ~ PD Project District U University PD P�� of f A Source:County of Hawaii. https:llwww.arccis.cotnl1otneAtem.html:?id=e8 Ebcaf8da9a414Da09aa922ef9I8ea4 Ace. 7121 Page 35 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Figure 7. Land Use Designations of Property and Vicinity 7c. County General Plan (Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map) Ab.nnn.n van Krim OTM y. Ku.i I I ol P a16 Vben Hilo Pilf-11,KT he, High Density Urban Medium Density Urban Low Density Urban WOO Nursep" Rural Ard Akho.v­; Property o Unwe'31LY MF University use Source:County of Hawaii,hMs.//wNvw.arc�is.coiri/liome/item.htiiil?id=073ebcf44eO3.43e5be9c765c65ff",9t'8 Acc. 7/21 Discussion:As the property is part qf the urban area ofHilo, it is already being serviced A Fire Station, Police Station, Library, Post Office and public school are all located within No miles of the site, In addition, there are many recreational facilities in the general area. 0 It shall include lands with satisfactory topography, drainage, and reasonably free from the danger of any flood, tsunami unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects Discussion: There are,no serious topographic, drainage, or soil conditions making the property unsuitable to urhan development 0 Land contiguous with existing urban areas shall be given more consideration than non-contiguous land, particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans or county community plans or development plans. Page 36 Hole 01a 4 Mohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Discussion: The properly is adjacent to the Sunrise Estates subdivision which is urban ill character. Within 500 feet of the site are the Mohouli senior housing complex and the Harry acrd Jeanette Weinberg Adarlt Day Center. • It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county community plans or development plans. Discussion: The property's LUPAG Map designation of Medhnn Density Urban supports the requested State Land Use Designation. • It may include lands which do not conform to the standards in paragraphs (1)to(5)when surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district. Discussion: The subject parcel substantially conforms to above criteria and in addition is adjacent to existing urban development. • It shall not include lands, the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public infrastructure or support services. Discussion: Placing the subject parcel in the Urban district does not represent spot development, as it is adjacent to urban development, supplied with all necessary utilities and services for urban use, and is designated for urhan uses in the General Plan. 3.6.3 Hawaii County Zoning The property is currently zoned Agriculture A-1 a (minimum Iot size one acre) (see Figure 7b). As discussed in Sections 1.1 and 3.6.2, HICDC intends to utilize the Section 201 H, HRS process in a request filed with the County OHM HICDC seeks, among other exemptions, to exempt the current County zoning to obtain a zoning of RM-4 [multi-family residential,4,O00 square feet minimum per building site). The process will involve a public hearing before the Windward Planning Commission, which will provide a recommendation to the Hawaii County Council, which must pass a resolution to permit the 201H exemptions. In that all necessary services and facilities are available, and. the General Plan designates the area for Medium Density urban uses, and the property is adjacent to existing urban zoning, the property is suitable for residential zoning and there will be no effects on the health and safety of the general public. 3.6.4 Hawaii County General Plan The General Plan for the County of Hawaii is a policy document expressing the broad goals and policies for the long-range development of the Island of Hawaii. The plan was adopted by ordinance in 1989 and revised in 2005 (Hawai`i County Planning Department). The General Plan itself is organized into thirteen elements, with policies, objectives, standards, and principles for each. There are also discussions of the specific applicability of each element to the nine judicial districts comprising the County of Hawaii. Page 37 Hale Ola 0 Mohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Most relevant to the proposed project are the following Goal and Policies, and Courses of Action of particular chapters of the General Plan: LAND USE 14.1.2 GOALS (a) Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. (b)Protect and encourage the intensive and extensive utilization of the County's important agricultural lands. (c) Protect and preserve forest,water,natural and scientific reserves and open areas. 14.1.3 POLICIES (a)Zone ut#ban types of uses in areas with ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. (b)Promote and encourage the rehabilitation and use of urban areas that are serviced by basic community facilities and utilities_ (c) Allocate appropriate requested zoning in accordance with the existing or projected needs of neighborhood, community, region and County. 0) Encourage urban development within existing zoned areas already served by basic infrastructure, or close to such areas, instead of scattered development. The Hawaii County General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide(LUPAG) component of the General Plan is a graphic representation of the Plan's goals, policies, and standards as well as of the physical relationship between land uses. It also establishes the basic urban and non-urban form for areas within the planned public and cultural facilities, public utilities and safety features, and transportation corridors. The property is within an area classified as Medium Density Urban (Figure 7c). Discussion: The need for affordable rental housing is critical and the Proposed Project is in keeping with the social, eultural, and physical environment. The area is not identified as imporlaral agricultural lands or lands valuahle for conservation. The area has ease ofaccess to community services and employment centers along with adequate public utilities and facilities. The property has adequate igfrastruclure in terms of wafer,proximity to wastewater litres, electric Wililies and tranAportatiorr facilities, and does not represent scattered development. The proposed use,fvr multi family housing is cons intent with the property's medium density designation in the LIIPAG. HOUSING 9.2 GOALS (a) Attain safe, sanitary, and Livable housing for the residents of the County of Hawaii. (b)Attain a diversity of socio-economic housing mix throughout the different parts of the County. (d)Create viable communities with affordable housing and suitable living environments. (f) Seek sufficient production of new affordable rental and fee-simple housing in the County in a variety of sizes to satisfactorily accommodate the needs and desires of families and individuals. (h) Make affordable housing available in reasonable proximity to employment centers. 1'age 38 Hale Ola 0 Alohmili Affordable Housing Environmental assessment 9.3 POLICIES (a) Encourage a volume of construction and rehabilitation of housing sufficient to meet growth needs and correct existing deficiencies. (c) Encourage corporations and nonprofit organizations to participate in Federal, State and private programs to provide new and rehabilitated housing for low and moderate income families. �]} Initiate and participate in activities with the private sector including the provision of leadership and expertise to neighborhoods and nonprofit organizations in the development of housing and community development projects. Discussion: The Proposed Prgject xrould provide additional of Qrdahle recital housing in an area with high demand, near sources of'employmew and.services. HISTORIC SITES 6.2 GOALS (a) Protect, restore, and enhance the sites, buildings, and objects of significant historical and cultural importance to Hawaii. (b)Appropriate access to significant historic sites,buildings, and objects of public interest should be made available. Discussion: The Proposed Project has involved appropriate archaeological survey to determine the presence and significance ofhistoric sites, of which there are none. Therefore the action satisfies relevairt goals,policies, and courses of action for historic sites in Hawa]`i County. NATURAL BEAUTY 7.2 GOALS (a) Protect, preserve and enhance the quality of areas endowed with natural beauty, including the quality of coastal scenic resources. (b)Protect scenic vistas and view planes from becoming obstructed. (c) Maximize opportunities for present and future generations to appreciate and enjoy natural and scenic beauty. 7.3 POLICIES (a) Increase public pedestrian access opportunities to scenic places and vistas. (d) Access easement to public or private lands that have natural or scenic value shall be provided or acquired for the public. (i) Do not allow incompatible constriction in areas of natural beauty. Discussion: The Proposed Project does �]ot involve scenic areas or vantages and would not be inconsistent with the natural beauty ofthe Hilo area. Therefore the action is consistent with relevant goals,policies, and courses of'action of the Natural Beauty section of the Hawai`i County General Plat]. NATURAL RESOURCES 8.2 GOALS (a) Protect and conserve the natural resources from undue exploitation, encroachment and damage. (b)Provide opportunities for recreational, economic, and educational needs without despoiling or endangering natural resources. Page 39 Hale Qla 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment (c)Protect and promote the prudent use of Hawaii's unique, fragile, and significant environmental and natural resources. (e) Protect and effectively manage Hawaii's open space, watersheds, shoreline, and natural areas. 8.3 POLICIES (b) Encourage a program of collection and dissemination of basic data concerning natural resources. (h) Encourage public and private agencies to manage the natural resources in a manner that avoids or minimizes adverse effects on the environment and depletion of energy and natural resources to the fullest extent. (i) Encourage an overall conservation ethic in the use of Hawaii's resources by protecting, preserving, and conserving the critical and significant natural resources of the County of Hawaii. (u) Ensure that activities authorized or funded by the County do not damage important natural resources. Discussion: Although the Proposed Project would involve lightly invaded native `ohi`a firest, the loss of roughly tine acres is miniscule in comparison to the thousands of acres of nearly identical `ohi`a forest mauka of Hilo on the 1881 lava flow, most of which has near-certain guarantees of proleclion because of its classifi'calion in the Conservation District. The Proposed Project is thus not inconsistent with the goals, standards and policies of the Natural Resources chapter of the Hawaii Count/ General Plaid. It should he noted that the property is not within the Special Management Area(SMA). PART 4: DETERMINATION Based on the findings below, and upon consideration of comments to the Draft EA, the Hawaii County Planning Department has determined that the proposed action will not significantly alter the environment, as impacts will be minimal and has accordingly issued a Finding of No Significant Impact(FONSI). PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, outlines those factors agencies must consider when detennining whether an Action has significant effects: (a) In considering the significance of potential environmental effects, agencies shall consider and evaluate the sum of effects of the Proposed Project on the quality of the environment. (b) In determining whether an action may have a significant effect on the environment, the agency shall consider every phase of a Proposed Project,the expected impacts, and the proposed mitigation measures. In most instances, an action shall be determined to have a significant effect on the environment if it may: 1. Irrevocably commit a natural, cultural, or historic resource. No valuable natural or cultural resource would be committed or lost. A common native vegetation type and several common native plants are present,but no rare,threatened or endangered species or unique native ecosystems would be adversely affected. An archaeological survey has determined that no historic sites are present on the property or would be affected. No valuable cultural resources and practices such as forest access, fishing, gathering, hunting, or access to ceremonial sites would be affected in any way. Page 40 Hale Ola 0 Mohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment 1 Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment. No restriction of beneficial uses would occur by construction and occupation of affordable rental housing on the property. 3. Cot flicl with the State's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law. The State's long-term environmental policies are set forth in Chapter 344, HRS. The broad goals of this policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life. The Proposed Project is environmentally beneficial and all adverse impacts are minor, and it is thus consistent with all elements of the State's long-term environmental policies. 4. Have asubstantial adverse effect on the economic welfare, social welfare, or cultural practices of the community and State. The Proposed Project would have highly beneficial and no substantial adverse effects on the economic or social welfare of the Big Island community or the State of Hawaii. 5. Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Proposed Project would not affect public health and safety in any adverse way. Wastewater will be disposed of in conformance with State Department of Health regulations. 6. Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. The scale and context of the Proposed Project would not produce any major secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. 7. Involve a substantial degradation of envirown7ental gara1i4-. The Proposed Project is minor and environmentally benign and would not contribute to environmental degradation. & Be individually limited but cumulatively have substantial adverse effect upon the environment or involves a commitment far larger actions. The adverse effects of the Proposed Project involve very limited and temporary disturbance to traffic, air quality,noise, and visual quality during constriction. During construction, there is at Ieast a small potentia! for noise, traffic and dust impacts from the affordable rental housing development to acccumulate with those of the proposed adjacent Fire and Police Dispatch Center, Portuguese Cultural Center and the Wal lani Mixed Use Project,under the scenario of two or more in ore being constructed at the same time. These impacts are miti-able and can be handled by construction-phase measures that can easily be implemented by the Hawaii County Department of Public Works,which is monitoring traffic in this area. Although traffic on Mohouli and Komohana Street would clearly rise as a result of all three projects,with the vast majority being attributed to the Wailani project, traffic analysis has demonstrated that with the extension of Ponahawai Street by Wailani, traffic impacts at Mohouli Street would not be severe and level of service would remain acceptable, 9. Have a substantial ach erse effect on a tare, threatened or endangered species, or its habitat. Thorough survey has determined that no endangered plant species are present. Other than the endangered Hawaiian hoary hat and the recently federally delisted Hawaiian hawk, island wide-ranging species that will experience no adverse impacts due to mitigation in the form of timing of vegetation removal and/or I'age 41 Hale Dla 0 Mohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment survey, no rare, threatened or endangered species of fauna are known to exist on or near the property, and none would be affected by any project activities. 10. Have a substantial adverse effect on air or water quali4,or ambient anise levels. No substantial effects to air, water, or ambient noise would occur. Brief, temporary effects would occur during construction and would be mitigated. Contractors will be required to consult with DOH per Title 11, Chapter 46, HAR (Community Noise Control)prior to construction. DOH would then review the proposed activity, location, equipment, project purpose and timetable in order to decide whether a permit is necessary and what conditions and mitigation measures, such as restriction of equipment type, maintenance requirements, restricted hours, and portable noise barriers, will be necessary. Dust will be controlled per State regulations through extensive BMPs. Erosion and sedimentation impacts will be avoided by implementation of Best Management Practices during grading. I 1. Have a substantial adverse effect on or be likely to stfffer damage by being located in an envlronmenlaliy sensitive area such as afood plain, tsunami torte, sea level rise exposure area, beach, erosion prone area, geologically hazardous land, estuary,fi•esh water, or coastal waters. Although the Proposed Project is located in an area with volcanic and seismic risk, the entire Island of Hawaii shares this risk. The facilities are not imprudent to construct and will employ design and construction standards appropriate to the seismic zone. The property is not located in a floodplain or any other hazardous area, and it would not affect any such area. Due to the elevation of the property at approximately 350 feet above sea level, there is no risk to the Proposed Project from sea level rise. The project has adapted to climate change by accounting for the potential for larger storms, through minimizing hard surfaces that generate runoff in heavy rainfall. 12. Have a substantial adverse Effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes, during day or Tright, identified in county or state plays or studies. No scenic sites or views are located nearby and none would be affected in any way. Alt exterior Iighting will be shielded and designed with the proper spectra to protect dark skies and transiting seabirds. 13. Require substantial enerU consumption or emit subsiantial greenhouse gases. Construction would involve unavoidable small but non-negligible carbon emissions. Occupation of the housing would entail greenhouse gas emissions that would be essentially the same regardless of where the residents live, leading to no net increase. Carbon emissions as a result of construction and operation of the Proposed Project would be considered negligible and are not expected to contribute significantly to global climate change. Page 42 Hale Ola 0 Alohouh Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment REFERENCES Devereux,T.K.,D,F. Rorthwick,H.H. Ilammatt,and M,O Orr. 1997. Archaeoingiral Reconnaissance.Snrvey r�f Keartkaha Military Reservation, South Hilo District, Hms,ai`i Island, (Hai•ai'i National Guard)503.6-acre parcel, IMK:2-1-12:3 and 2-1-13:10, Cultural Surveys Hawaii,Kailua,Hl. Gagne, W.,and L. Cuddihy. 1990. "Vegetation,"pp,45-114 in W.L, Wagner,D.R. Herbst,and S.H. Sohmer,eds., Mannal of the Flowering Plants ofHativai`i. 2 vols.Honolulu: University or Hawaii Press. Giambclluca,T.W.,Q.Chen,A.G. Frazier,J.F. Price,Y.-L.Chen,P.-S.Chu,J.K.Eischeid,and D.M. Delparte,2013: Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii.Bull.Amer. Meteor. Svc.,dol: 10.1175BAMS-D-11-00228.1. Handy,E.S.C.,and E.G. Handy. 1972.Native Planters in Old Hawaii:Their Life,Lore,and Environment_ B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu. Hawaii County Department of Public Works(DPW). 2009.Final Environmental Assessment for Fire Administration Support Complex. Prep. by M&E Pacific,Inc.. for DPW. Hawaii County Department of Public Works(DPW). 2009. Final Environmental Assessment for Fire Administration Support C'ompler. Prep. by M&E Pacific,Inc.. for DPW. Hawaii County Planning Department.2005. Ae General Plait, Courtly ofHmvai`i.Hilo. Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources(DLNR). 2017.Rapid 'Ohi'a Death:Part 1.Strategic Response Plan for Hawai`i, 2017-2019.Prep.by Division of Forestry& Wildlife. Honolulu. Heliker,C. 1990. Volcanic and Seismic Hazards on the Island of"Hawai'i. Washington: U.S. GPO. Howarth F.G.2002.An assessment of the conservation status raf the terrestrial cave.fauna occrtrring on the Islands of Maui and Molokai, Hativai'i. Honolulu,(Hl):U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service,Pacific Islands Office. Katnakau,S. 1961.Ruling Chiefs of Harrai'i. Honolulu: The Kameltameha Schools Press. Kelly,M. 1981. "Archaeological and Historical Studics for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo Hawaii.Report 1. Background History."Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum,Honolulu. Prepared for U.S. Anny Engineer District, Pacific Ocean. Kelly,M.,B. Nakamura,and Dorothy Barrere. 1981.A Chronological Hislotti, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bcry Area. Island of Havvai'i. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press. Maly,K. 1996a. Appendix In: "Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project,Lands of Wainaku, Ponohawai,Pi`ihonua,and Waiiakea,South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii (TMK: 2-6-15:1,2;2-6-16:2;2-4-49:18,19; 2-2-15:33; 2-4-1:12)."Paul H.Rosendahl,Inc.,Hilo.PHRI Report 1721-001496.Prepared for State of Hawaii, Honolulu. . 1996b.Historical Documentary Research and Oral Hisloty Inten,ie►rs, WaWkea Cane Lots(12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20&20A).Hilo: Kumu Pono Associates. McEldowney,H. 1979."Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study,Hilo Hawai`i."Manuscript on tile,Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division. Page 43 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Mitchell,C,C.Ogura,DW.Meadows,A.Kane,L. Strommcr, S. Frctz,D. Leonard,and A.McClung.2005.Hawaii's Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy.Hawaii State Department of Land and Natural Resources.Honolulu, Hawaii. Moniz,J.J, 1992. Summary of Prior Archaeological Work:Historical and,4rchaeological.5),whesis ol'Land Use and Settlement Patterns Waidkea Ahupnta'a. Hilo, Hawaii.UH Anthropology 645.Historic Preservation,Fall 1992, Honolulu. Pukui,M.K.,Elbert,S.H.,and E.T.Mookini. 1976.Place Names of Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Slay,M.E.,Porter,M.L.,Slay,C.,Engel,A.S. 2018."Preliminary results fmm a survey of lava tube eaves in the southwest region of the Ka'u district of the Big Island,Hawai`i."241h Inlernational Conference on Subierrancan Biology, 20-24 August 2018,ARPHA Conference Abstracts 1: c29874.https:/ldoi.org/10.3897/aca.l.e29974. U.S.Council on Environmental Quality(CEQ).2016.Final Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and theEjfects gfClimate Change in National Enyironmen(al Policy Act Reviews.Guidance dated August 1,2016,signed by C. Goldfuss,CEQ. U.S.Dept.of Commerce,Economics and Statistics Administration,Bureau of the Census, 2010, htip://factfisider2.census.gov/. U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS). 2021. USFW,S Endangered Species Home Page. https://www.fws.gov/cndangered/. U.S. Geological Survey(USG S).2000. Seismic Hazard/Maps for Hcnraii. By F.W. Klein,A.D. Frankel,C.S. Mueller, R.L. Wesson and P.G.Okubo. U.S. Soil Conservation Service. 1973.Soil % w y of Island o1-Hawai`i, State of Hawai`i. Washington: U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. University of Hawaii at Hilo, Dept.of Geography, 1995.Atlas of Hawai`i. 3rd ed.Honolulu: University of Hawai i Press. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Sea Grant College Program. 2014.Climate Change Impacts in Hau•ai`i-A summary o1' climate change and its iml)acts to Hawai`i's ecosystems and communities, UNIHI-SEAGRANT-TT-12-04. Wolfe,E.W.,and J. Morris. 1996.Geologic Map of the Island gfHawai'i. USGS Misc. Investigations Series Map 1- 2524-A. Washington,D.C.: U.S.Geological Survey. Page 44 Hale Ola 0 Afohouli Affordable Housing Environmental Assessment Hale Ula U Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX la Comments in Response to Early Consultation [This page intentionally left blanl►[ geometrician ASSOC I A T E S , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (806) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com April 20, 2021 Dear Neighbor or Agency/Organization Official: Subject: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project, TMK(3)24-001:168 (9.191 acres), South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Our firm is in the process of preparing an Environmental Assessment(EA) for a proposed activity proposing use of government land, in compliance with Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statues (HAR), and.Title 11, Chapter 200.1, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR). The property is State land under Executive Order to the County of Hawai`i that is under lease to the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC)for affordable housing uses. The exact nature of the 90-unit maximum affordable housing and the layout of the facilities on the property have not yet been determined, but there is sufficient information to examine environmental impacts and designate mitigation measures to avoid, reduce or compensate for any impacts. The property is currently within the State Land Use Agricultural District and is zoned by the County of Hawaii for Agriculture. As such, the affordable housing project will require a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone. The property is situated in a growing urban neighborhood of Hilo near three elderly housing projects and an adult day center, the planned Fire and Police Dispatch Center, and the Sunrise Estates subdivision. The property is forested land on the 1881 lava flow, and an archaeological survey has determined that no historic sites are present. The EA will include a biological survey, a Traffic impact Assessment Report, and various other evaluations. I would appreciate your comments on any special environmental conditions or impacts related to the project. Please contact me at(808)969-7090 or email to rterry@hawaii.rr.com if you have any questions or require clarification. Kindly indicate whether you wish to receive notice of EA availability when it has been completed. Sincerely, pm&�J Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates s � �'��'°��•S Prope ray ..�` " Q�� ��� -� � rlpr �D rr r 0 - � 6 N ti.2a20 GaoglE � 1032't _ Mitchell D. Roth Paul K. Ferreira 110)w Police 01(v/ rr e? ► Kenneth Bugado Jr. f}e/mIq'PalMn�l11Yr County of Hawai' i POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapi'alani Street Hilo.liauai'i 96720-3998 (808)935-3311 • Fax(808)961-2389 April 28, 2021 Mr. Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates, LLC 10 Hina Street Hilo, HI 96724 Dear Mr. Terry: SUBJECT: EARLY CONSULTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT, TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 (9.091 ACRES), SOUTH HILO DISTRICT, ISLAND OF HAWAII Staff has reviewed the above-referenced documents and has no comments at this time. If you have any questions, please contact Captain Reed Mahuna, Commander of the South Hilo Division, at (808) 951-2214 or via a-mail at reed.mahuna@a hawaiicounty.gov. Sincerely, J 'I�fE�0CQIQIQ�3Ft' SSISTAN CHIEF AREA 1 OPERATIONS RM'1102'HQ0389 -'ilawai'i County is an Equal Opporlunity Provider and Em plover" tY a�y Mitchell D. Roth Zendo Kern Mavor Director Lee E.Lord Jeffrey W.Darrow Managing Director s�; � Deputy Director ��•OF.µ�yl West Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy ■ ■ 101 Pauahi 5trect,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(90a)321 4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(809)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax f809)961-8742 June 1,2021 Mr. Ron Terry Principal Geometrician Associates 10 Hina Street Hilo, HI 96724 Dear Mr, Terry: SUBJECT: Request for Early Environmental Assessment Comments for an Affordable Housing Project Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Tax Map Key: (3)2-4-001.:168 This is in response to your letter receieved by this office on April 23, 2021, requesting early consultation for an Environmental Assessment (EA) that is being prepared in accordance with the County's requirements for a State Land Use Boundary- Amendment and Change of Zone Application. According to your letter, the applicant is planning to build a 90-unit maximum, affordable housing project to be situated on the subject parcel. Land Use Designations For your information, the subject parcel is located within the County's Agricultural (A-la) zoning district and the State Land Use Agricultural district, The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map identifies the area as Medium Density Urban. The subject parcel is 9.091 acres in size and is not located within the County's Special Management Area (SMA). The current landowner of record is the State of Hawaii. Permitting Histor ■ On October 23, 2020, the applicant, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), submitted a State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20- 400054) for the subject property to reclassify the State Land Use Boundary from Agriculture to Urban. kvWW-Planning.l1awaiicaurtt .LDV Hawaii County is apt Equal Opportunity Pravider and Employer planning�a hawaiicounly..ov Mr, Ron Terry Geometrician Associates June 1, 2021 Page 2 • The applicant also plans to rezone the subject property via a HRS 201H application process from Agricultural with a minimum lot size of 1 acre (A-1a) to Multiple Family Residential with a minimum land area of 4,004 square feet (RM-4) zoning district. The reclassification of the State Land Use District and Zoning District would allow for the applicant to develop the Hale Dia O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. • On January 6, 2021, the applicant requested a deferral of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054)pending the completion of an Environmental Assessment. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and please also provide us with a copy of the Draft Environmental Assessment for our review and comment. 1f you have any questions, please feel free to contact Tracie-Lee Camero at(808)961-8166. Sincerely, ZENDO KERN Planning Director TC.jaa ...COHO 1,pIanning pub]ic'•.wpwin50.Tracie'Letters•❑£A'-WcometricianAssedatesLLC-PreEA Comments-2400!158.doc From:Tim Keller<Iazyk5I@yahoc com> Sent:Wednesday, May 19, 2021 12:28 PM To: rterry@hawaii-rr.com Subject: EA FOR TMK (3) 2-4-001:158 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Hi LO Mr, Terry Sorry for the late response, but we just returned from a month long trip to the mainland. In response to your letter dated April 20, 2021 for comments on any environmental conditions or impacts, we have a few commnets. 1. Control measures in the prevention of any potential Rapid Ghia Death (ROD) spread onto our properties while clearing land. 2. Dust control measures to minimize dust clouds flowing onto our property which would impact cost of pool maintenance during your construction project. 3. Pest Control: mitigating ferral pigs and rodents migration onto our property due to loss of habitat. Note: the pigs have already dug up our back yard and we have had to pay to hire someone to trap pigs. The rats and chickens as well will be looking For new homes. 4. Traffic Management Plan. While we know you have said a traffic study was conducted and the plan was to have one way traffic out of the new road leading on to Mohouli. We take issue with this findinglrecommendation. For one, merging traffic onto a limited visabiIity road due to curvature of the road is an accident waiting to happen. Plus you have alot of walkers and bike rides that use the shoulder. the flow of that traffic would head to an already intersection to cross (Mohouli and Kukuau) especially during key traffic times, 7-9AM, 11AM-1 PM AND 3-6 PM Flush Hour traffic. You also now have added traffic turning onto Kukuau to cut through subdivision to head to town. We have neighbors on both siaes of us with young children and speeding vehicles passing by aur house is already a problem and it will only get worse with the additional traffic. Lovina Sabnani and Tim Keller 847 Kukuau St. Hilo, HI 96720 os . Mitchell O. Rath Kazuo S.K.L. Todd M4 v or �' Fl"C'hrrj Lee E. Lord Managing Director County of 'ataa it HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street■Suite 2501•Hilo,Hawaii 95720 (848)932-2900•Fax(808)932-2928 May 18, 2021 Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates, LLC P.O. Box 396 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Mr. Ron Terry: SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 (9.091 acres), South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii We are in receipt of your letter dated April 20, 2021 in regards Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project. The Hawaii Fire Department would like to receive notice of EA availability. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact my office at(808)932-2911. Mahalo, KAZUO S.K.L. TODD Fire Chief KV/ds Haivar'r C.ejurrty is er+Equal Qpporknuty PrnvnferRNrt Errrployer. ��o►_k� SUZANN E D-CA S E DAVID Y,IGEF��!' SDSY t CHAIRPERSON GOVERNOR OF HAWAII BOARD OFLAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES C DM S1IS'IOV ON%%ATE R RF,SOURC F. MASACEMENT and deo S� STATE OF HAWAII 444,ofµ0+!00 DEPARTIM ENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 May 21, 2021 Geometrician Associates, LLC Attention: Mr. Ron Terry via email: rte! hawaii.rr.com P.O. Box 396 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Mr. Terry: SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project located at South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4- 001:168 j9.091 acres)on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Thank you for the opportun ity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division, (b) Commission on Water Resource Management, and (c) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura(a')hawai_i,gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell rsuJi Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files Pi x10F N� { ❑AVID Y IGE SUPANNNE D�CNASE C.fNEA�QC k�WNe� i IiAMAhlA REAMER PH❑ EETHLG BUCK ELS AA CHARM 0 NEE7H -,.+. NEIL J HANNAHS WAYNE K KATAYAMA PAUL J MEYER STATE OF HAWAII M GEAL PurY MANL7EL r a DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESCGRCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P 0 SOX 621 HONOLULU HAWAII 96809 May 19. 2021 REF: RFD.5658.8 TO Mr. Russell Tsuji,Administrator Land Division .�/ FROM M. Kalea Manuel, Deputy Director ` 4V`0 Commission an Water Resource Management SUBJECT Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project, South Hilo (Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation) FILE NO.. RFD-5658.8 TMK NO.. (3)24-001:168 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document The Commission on Water Resource Management(CWRM)is the agency responsible for administering the State Water Code(Code). under the Code. all waters of the State are held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the State,therefore all water use is sub,ect to legally protected water rights. CWRM strongly promotes the efficient use of Hawaii's water resources through conservation measures and appropriate resource management. For more information,please refer to the State Water Code, Chapter 1740, Hawaii Revised Statutes, and Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapters 13-167 to 13-171 These documents are available via the Internet at http'11dlnr.hawaii.govlcwrm. Our comrrents related to water resources are checked off below. El1. We recommend coordination with the county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and Development Plan. Please contact the respective Planning Department and/or Department of Water Supply for further information. El2. We recommend coordination with the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Projects Plan. F1 3. We recommend coordination with the Hawaii Department of Agriculture(HDOA)to incorporate the reclassification of agricultural zoned land and the redistribution of agricultural resources into the State's Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan (AWUDP). Please contact the HDOA for more information. 0 4. We recommend that water efficient fixtures be installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the development to reduce the increased demand on the area's freshwater resources. Reducing the water usage of a home or building may earn credit towards Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEER)certification, More information on LEED certification is available at http11www.usgbc.org/teed. A listing of fixtures certified by the EAP as having high water efficiency can be found at httpINvww.epa.gov/watersense. 5- We recommend the use of best management practices(BMP)for stormwater management to minimize the impact of the project to the existing area's hydrology while maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Stormwater management BMPs may earn credit toward LEED certification. More information on stormwater BMPs can be found at http:llplan n i ng.hawa i i.g ov/czrn/initiatives/low-impact-development/ F6. We recommend the use of alternative water sources,wherever practicable. 7 We recommend participating in the Hawaii Green Business Program,that assists and recognizes businesses that strive to operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. The program description can be found online at http://energy.hawaii.gov/grean-business-program. 0 8. We recommend adopting landscape irrigation conservation best management practices endorsed by the Landscape Industry Council of Hawaii. These practices can be found online at Mr. Russell Tsuji Page 2 May 19, 2021 http://www.hawaiiscape.comlwp-content/uploads/2013/Q4/LICH_Irrigation_Conservation_SMPs.jpdf. 9. There may be the potential for ground or surface water degradationlcontamination and recommend that approvals for this project be conditioned upon a review by the State Department of Health and the developer's acceptance of any resulting requirements related to water quality. 10 The proposed water supply sou•ce for the project is located in a designated water management area, and a Water Use Permit is required onor to use of water. The Water Use Penn it may be conditioned on the requirement to use dual line water supply systems for new industrial and commercial developments. 11 A Well Construction Permit(s)is (are)are required before the ccmmencement of any well construction work. D12 A Pump Installation Permits)is(are)required before ground water is developed as a source of supply for the project. 13 There is(are)well(s)located on or adjacent to this project. If wells are not planned to be used and will be affected by any new construction, they must be properly abandoned and sealed. A permit for well abandonment must be obtained. 14 Ground-water withdrawals from this project may affect streamflows,which may require an instream flow standard amendment. 15 A Stream Channel Alteration Permits)is(are) required before any alteration can be made to the bed and/or banks of a steam channel. 16 A Stream Diversion Works Permits)is (are)required before any stream diversion works is constructed or altered. 17 A Petition to Amend the Interim Instream Flow Standard is required for any new or expanded diversion(s) of surface water. 18 The planned source of water for this project has not been identified in this report. Therefore,we cannot determine what permits or petitions are required from our office. or whether there are potential impacts to water resources 0 OTHER: Planning-The proposed water sources)and projected water demands for the project, both potable and non-potable,should be identified and the ca.culations used to estimate demands should be provided. A discussion of the potential impacts on water resources and other public trust uses of water should be included, and any proposed mitigation measures described. Water conservation and efficiency measures to be implemented should also be discussed. If you have any questions, please contact Neal Fujii of the Commission staff at 587-0216. SVMNNE U.CASC C11A[RPERSON ppVlp Y.IGE �¢ .`•*_ gO,�RU OF LA!lD.1!10 YATVAAL RESOVRCF.5 GOVERNOR OF FUWNI _ �, C0 N 01 L$S 10Y ON WATER RESOURCE SIAYAGEMENT l i 3 STATE OF HAWAII s� a DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE Box 621 HONOLULU.HAWAII 96809 April 26, 2021 MEMORANDUM FROM: T-$ DLNR Agencies: Div. of Aquatic Resources —Div. of Boating & ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGR hawaii. ov) X Div, of Forestry& Wildlife (rub rosa.t.terra a hawaii. ov) _Div. of State Parks -Tcommission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRM t awaii. ov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division– Hawaii District (g_ordon.c.heit(a7hawaii.gov) TO: _ Russell Tsuji Russell Y. Tsuji, land Administrator SUBJECT; Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project LOCATION: South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:16 8 (9.091 acres) APPLICANT: Geometrician Associates, LLC on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by May 20, 2021. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at darlene.k,nakamura .hawaii.go_v_. Thank you. ( } We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( ] We have no additional comments. (V) Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: Carty S" Chang, Chief Engineer Division: Engineering Division Date: May 12, 2021 Attachments cc: Central Files DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y.Tsuji Ref: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project Location: South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii TMK(s): (3)2-4-401:168(9.091 acres) Applicant: Geometrician Associates,LLC on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP),Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations(44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area (high-risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 44CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 44CFR reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP, Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones are designated on FEh4A's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool(FHAT)(http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT). If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances,please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: a Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808) 768-8498. o Hawaii Island: County of Hawaii,Department of Public Works (808) 961-8327. o Maui_'Molokai'Lanai County of Maui, Department of Planning(848)270-7253. a Kauai: County of Kauai, Department of Public Works(808)241-4895. Signed: 4Z�7 C RTY S. C ANG, CHIEF ENGINEER Date: May 12,2021 �911112-1 ,M� SU7ANNE D.CASE DAVID Y.IGE ■4+�5o7p CHAMPERn"OV GOVERNDR OF HAWA,1 r� � �Yi BOA RD OF lA!10 ANO NATURAL RFS90 URUS I ?` CO M MISS FON IDN SVA TER RF-SOU RCE MANAGEMENT STATE OF HAWAII darn nrDE PA RTME NT OF LAND AND NATURAL RFSOL RCES LAVA 1AVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 April 26, 2021 MEMORANDUM T0: DLNR Agencies: —Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGRCcyhawaii.Qov) X Div, of Forestry & Wildlife (rubvrosa.t.terraao cC7r hawaii.gov) _Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management(DLNR.CVVRK4@hawaii.vov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands }C Land Division– Hawaii District (gordon.c,heit@hawaii.nov) FROM: Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Russ&,'/esu/r SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project LOCATION; South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii; TMK. (3)2-4-001:168 (9,091 acres) APPLICANT: Geometrician Associates, LLC on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by May 20, 2021. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request,please contact Darlene Nakamura at darlene k.nakamuraghawaii.gov. Thank you. { ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( ) We have no additional comments. [ Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: Division: Date: l Attachments cc: Central Files s R.�. ,hA SUZANNF D.CASE hAV{D Y.IGE w a'',,eeo;: CHAIRPERSON (jnVF MOR OF HAA All -� '✓ BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RME1RCES COMMISSpH ON WATER RESOURCE HAi(AGEMENT dynd anr,'"8vL STATE OF HAWAII stare of FSav+'� UEPARTM ENT of LAND AND NATURAL RESO URGES UknD DIVISION 75 Aupun:Sucei,Room 204 Hilo,Hawaii S6720 PHOW (809)961-959D rAX.(808)961-9599 May 11,2021 MEMORANDUM TO: Russell Y. Tsuji, Administrator FROM: Gordon C. Heit, Hawaii District Land Age SUBJECT: Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project LOCATION: Waiakea, South Hilo, island of Hawaii, TMK: (3)2-1-001:168 APPLICANT: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Pursuant to your request for comments on the above matter,we offer the following. The property identified by TMK: (3) 2-1-001:168 is currently encumbered under Executive Order No's. 4531 to the County of Hawaii for Elderly and/or Affordable Rental Housing and Related Purposes. The project described is consistent with the executive order and the Hawaii District Land Office has no objection to the proposed project. Please contact me should you have any questions. O�WAT$d8 LA qy� AtA ■ DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAVI 345 KEKOANAO'A STREET,SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAII 9672{) TELEPHONE (808)964-8050 - FAX(808)861-8657 June 14, 2021 Mr. Ron Terry Geometrician Associates, LLC P.O. Box 396 Hilo, HI 95721 Dean-Mr. Terry: Subject: Pre-Environmental Assessment for Affordable Housing Project South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Tax Map Key 2-4-041:168 This is in response to your Pre -Environmental Assessment letter dated April 20, 2021. Please be informed that there is an existing 12-inch waterline along Mohouli Street fronting the subject parcel or an existing 12-inch waterline along Kupuna Place. Prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project,the Department will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval. After review of the calculations, the Department will determine a water commitment deposit amount, prevailing facilities charge (subject to change)to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. Construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements must also be submitted for review and approval. Please be informed that the existing 12-inch waterlines within both roadways are adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute for fire protection,as required per the Department's Water System Standards. Any meter(s) serving the proposed project will require the installation of a reduced principle type backflow prevention assembly within five (5) feet of the meter on private property. The Department must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. We have no additional comments on any special environmental conditions. Water, Our W ost(Precious WSsouree. . . Y,,q Wai}Z ane. . . The aepartmeni of Water SuppSy is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. M;.Ron Terry Page 2 June 10, 2021 Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 255. Sincerely yours, �VVIMAAO Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg copy- Mr. Keith Kato, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Hale Ula U Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX Ib Comments to Draft EA and Responses OA ASREM LLC. PO M%952561 ao.As 96,199 Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Attn: Mr.Keith Kato 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 RE: Hale ❑ Mohouli 90-unit affordable housing Dear Mr. Kato, Considering the published newspaper update to the planned housing in downtown Hilo yesterday, we are wondering the design as shown in the EIS with associated price-tag are finalized? Our reason for contacting is many-fold: With the definition of "affordable" housing in Hawaii remaining a mystery to me in light at the here proposed price-tag with a per unit cost coming in at roughly — $ 522,000.00, requiring a median income to above $ 75,000 for anybody wishing to rent to meet ROI. This precludes a considerable amount of people while still not offering any "true affordable" solution to Hawaii's ongoing problem. The increasing amount of `homelessness' is indicative of said concerning trend. FYI, I have for over 30-years traveled through Hawaii and onward, thus familiar with this issue not only on the Big Island. We sold our dwelling in HPP earlier this year- seeking retreat to American Samoa in view to ever-increasing traffic & commercialization contributing to losing the 'Aloha' island appeal. 1. The `pocket design' while costly, lacks any renewable aspects as mandated. 2. half-hearted past approaches leave the community struggling with ever increase municipal household & construction waste being generated. 1 ASREM LLC. M 00%9825.51 P.ypsi'xp .As 96799 3. construction waste into landfill makes for a significant portion, leaving transfer stations struggle with its increasing daily trucking to the Kona side for landfilling. What if- we were to offer you/Hawaii a turnkey, modular solution at the fraction of the here proposed cost to realizing a sustainable and in many aspects more environmentally sound, more cost-effective dwelling/multi-dwelling solution? • One that arrives at Hilo port for trucking on a prepared site for set-up, with all services arranged underground "Plug & Play" in place for quick hook-up? • One that comes with an integrated R E solution into central storage, aside EV recharge infrastructure to promote electric car usage. • One that does not require construction waste to landfilling. • One that offers affordable to "true low-income" folks. • One that comes complete with furniture & appliances, filtration AC, double pane windows/heavy sliders and appropriate insulation/high-end vanity's/ wired for WIFI and ceiling speakers. • One that comes with cement outside cladding and decking from recycled plastic composites - a perfect no-maintenance solution for Hilo's wet climate. • One that offers a modern & contemporary in-and outside community appeal and colors • One that offers multiple glass elevators, specially laid-out units with access to accommodate wheelchair/handicapped folks. • One that offers an integrated 'Building Information Modeling' (BIM1 in digital 3D - offering building maintenance a true tool to fix & address any issue in the shortest of time. • One that offers in view of the beforementioned a 10-year structural warranty, otherwise unheard of in Hawaii! ■ One that carnes a turnkey project price-tag under < USD $ 20M 2 ASREM LLC. PO ea.9825SI PAHO-P+gu.As %799 • One with a project realization within/under < 12-months form time of project "go" to move-in, assuming site prep-work completed in the meantime. • One that withstands any seismic / inclement weather event - due its `strong-box' steel desigr. • One that exceeds the planned amenities utilizing `smart' building concept While in Quarantine in Honolulu - as part of ASG repatriation program in June, I was able to elevate the concept to Lt. Josh Greene as an alternative to Hawaii' lack of "true affordable housing." We are currently working with the local ASG government on sustainable 300 x ppl, 3 x story Quarantine multi-center complexes, including renewable energies, kitchen, and Laboratory facilities on 5-acres. The whole project is ASTM/UL compliant with world-wide installations ranging from Miami, FL. to Scandinavia, Europe, HK, across Asia, Emirates and close to us, in New Zealand of special interest after recent earthquakes. ❑ur firm has the Oceania 'exclusive' marketing including for Hawaiian Islands — thus prepositioned to help the project execution along being familiar with the lay- of-the-land. Below are a few of pits, including of award-winning projects, that not knowing they are of the here proposed 'modular' nature — would otherwise be hard to recognize as such. 3 w r r ED-imp kR fr ` - ASREM LLC. PO Om 9SUSI rago-rrt.4s 967" 1 ,4 l Since the project seems to rely on `County funding" to get executed, we can offer a re-design in both concept & cost, given the use of the existing site —to provide 3❑ / color renderings towards a more economical & sustainable approach, leaving funding available for yet other projects? Should this be of interest —we are happy to discuss details at your convenience, whereby I can be reached via here e-mail, or my mobile at: +1(684)782-3383. Mahalo & regards, Chris Thunken; ENG. Managing Partner 6 From:Chris Thunkenechris@greengiobesolutions.energy> Sent: Monday,August 30, 20217:58 AM To: keith.hicdc@gmail.com Cc:Tracie-Lee.Camero@hawaiicounty.gov; rterry@hawaii.rr.com,mitchellroth@yahoo,com Subject: Mohouli proposes!90-unit 'affordable' housing on TMK(3)2-4-001:158 ...resending August 30, 2021/no response! Aloha Keith, Making contact to see interest to pursue an alternative dwelling solution away from traditional 'lumber &mortar' and in view to ever escalating resource pricing&availahiIity-towards a modular,turnkey significantly in cost reduced option, at a fraction of the going$/sgft. rate in Hawaii. It is faster to realize, better suited to withstand any seismic or inclement weather events at much reduced maintenance. Our attached PDF letter goes into more detail 1 specifics with interest to offer Hawaii a truly alternative housing solution that comes with a 10-year structural warranty. This here 90-unit project would be a perfect 'show-piece'to rewrite the local housing market. Affordable multi-plex shelters for the homeless could realistically address the ever growing humanitarian crises at a fraction of the cost.Another show-piece for Hawaii and to lead the way in the pacific. Looking forward to hearing from you—I remain, With best regards, CHRIS geometrician A S S O C I A T E S , L L C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassoc iate s.com September 17, 2021 Chris Thunken chris(q),greenglobe so l ution s.energy Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola Q Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3) 2-4-0111:168 Dear Mr. Thunken: Thank you for your comment emails dated August I 1 and 30,2021,which also included an undated letter to Keith Kato, Executive Director of the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation(HICDC). In answer to your specific comments: I.IF design set? Would prnject proponent be willing to ...'puisne an alternative dwelling.sohttion away from traditional 'lumber& mortar'and in view to ever escalating resource pricing& availability-towards a modular, turnkey significantly in cost rethfced option, at a fraction o f the giving$Isgft. rate in Hawaii. It is,faster to realize, better suited to withstand any seismic or inclement weather events at march reduced maintenance, Affordable multi plea.shelters far the homeless could realistically address the ever growing humanitarian crises at a fraction of the cost.Another.show-piece for Hawaii and to lead the way in the pacific.." The basic design concept and scale of the project have been set;however,the particulars of the project are subject to change in order to meet budgetary and final design requirements. HICDC's experience is that the chosen development concepts creates attractive living conditions for both seniors and families. HICDC is looking into the feasibility of modular construction for this praiect,but it is too early to determine whether it will be practical. 2.A.SREM design better suited to withstand any seismic or inclement weather events at much reduced maintenance. The final project will be designed to meet all seismic,wind and structural requirements of the Building Code. HICDC is familiar with the maintenance requirements and will be designing the project to ininimize unnecessary maintenance costs. 3.Pocket design, while costly, lacks any renewable aspects as mandated The proposed project will meet all mandates for sustainable development. 4.Half-hearted past approaches leave the communitf,straggling with ever increase municipal household& construct ion waste being generated We differ from your interpretation that past efforts by agencies and non-profits have been half-hearted. There are many obstacles to building affordable housing, but HICDC alone has constructed 742 affordable housing units and has another 200 units in the development process. Hale Gla G Mohouli will be a significant contribution to the goal of satisfying East Hawai`i's need for affordable housing. We very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions, please contact ine at(808) 969-7090, Sincerely, I �• Ron Terry,Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Kcith Kato,HICDC: Tracic-Lee Camero,Hawaii County Planning SUZANNE.b.CASE DAVID Y.iGE .��-, ie�a _ CHAIRPERSON GDVERHOR OF 1iHWAlI �.' BOARD DF LAND AND NATL'PAL RFS0QNCES COVN15S 1 ON DN%I ATER RFSO URCE '3 y'! �l +t.aNACE�IENT STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX C?I HONOLULU,HAWAII 96869 September 7, 2021 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Tracie-Lee Camera via email: tracie-lee,rameroahawaiicounty.ciov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing located at South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2- 4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, en0used are Comments from the (a) Engineering Division and (b) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura(a�hawaii.pov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell TsuJi Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files Geometrician Associates, LLC (w/copies) Atten: Mr. Ron Terry (via email: rterryaa hawaii.rr.corn s r U! ry+ 5417-.ANNE P.CASE OAVIO Y.IGE FFA�qay CHAIRPERSON GOVERNOR OF RA1NAll �: BOARD OF LA, Atip NATURAL RESOURCES 1 COMSIISS ION ON I&ATER RESOURCE 31AYACEME\T 6`��hand and y STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POS'r OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 August 11, 2021 FROM: MEMORANDUM T-()-- DLNR Agencies: Div. of Aquatic Resources —Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation 7C Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGRCar)hawaii.aovl X Div. of Forestry & Wildlife (rub rosa.t.terra o hawaii. ov) _Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRM@hawaii;gov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division– Hawaii District (gordon,c.heitCo),hawaii.gov} TO: FROM Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Rt7"yo SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TM (3) 2-4-001:168 APPLICANT: Geometrician Associates on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. The DEA was published on August 8, 2021 by the State Environmental Review Program (formerly the Office of Environmental Quality Control) at the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development in the periodic bulletin, The Environmental Notice, available at the following link: http//oegc2-doh.hawaii.gov[The Environmental Notice12021-08-08-TEN.udf Please submit any comments by September 3, 2021. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions, please contact Darlene Nakamura directly via email at darlene.k.nakamura d_)hawaii.gov. Thank you, ( } We have no objections. ( } We have no comments, ( V) We have no additional comments. ( } Comments a e attached. Signed: l 2 Print Name: Carty S. Chang, Chief Engineer Division: Engineering Division Date: Aug 31,2021 Attachments cc. Central Files •";.4•r•;!� SO LANNE 0.CA5E DAVID Y.1GE *•;+9�a,'•.,7 LNAIRPFRSO.Y GOVERNOR OFNAWAl1 9:' BOARD OF LAND AND NATORAI.RESOI RCF5 �.+I L+CMMMION ON WATER RFS DO RCE I ♦i MAYACEM"T r+ � '�weie iid STATE OF HAWAII sfarcnlaw0� DEPA RTNI ENT Or LAND AND NATU R.AL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST GFFICL:HOX 621 1IONi]!_IA.U,HAWAII 96809 August 11, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO- DLNR Agencies: —Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division DLNR.ENGR hawaii. ov) X Div. of Forestry &Wildlife (rubyrosa.t.terragophawaii.gov) —Div- of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRM@hawaii.gov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands XLand Division–Hawaii District (gordon.c.heitghawaii.pov} FROM: Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrators Myr SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing LOCATION: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK {3} 2-4-001:168 APPLICANT Geometrician Associates on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. The DEA was published on August 8, 2021 by the State Environmental Review Program {formerly the Office of Environmental Quality Control} at the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development in the periodic bulletin, The Environmental Notice, available at the following link., http://oegc2_doh.hawaii.gov/The Environmental Notice/2021-08-08-TEN.p Please submit any comments by September 3, 2021. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions, please contact Darlene Nakamura directly via errail at darlene-k-nakamura@hawaii.ciov. Thank you. { } We have no objections. { } We have no comments. { ) We have no additional comments. { } Comments are attached. Signed 4el?roC� Print Name: _ (3 �2k-�7 OA-) c_ Division: C>_ .. Date: Attachments cc: Central Files geometrician ASSOC I A T E S , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7094 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassoc iates.com September 17, 2021 Russell Y. Tsuji. Land Administrator Hawaii DLNR Land Division P.D. Box 621 Honolulu, Hawaii 96809 Dear Mr. Tsui i Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Dla D'Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TNIK(3) 2-4-001:168 Thank you for your comment letter dated September 7,2021, transmitting comments from various divisions of DLNR. We hereby acknowledge the no-comment, no-additional comments,or no-objections from Hawaii Island nand Division and the Engineering Division. We very much appreciate your circulating the EA for review by DLNR agencies. 1f you have any questions, please contact me at(808)969-7090. Sincerely, PM�� Ran Terry, Principal Geometrician ,associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camera, Hawaii County planning Mori, Ashley To: Camera, Tracie-Lee Subject: RE: From: lex pen<lexpen808@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,August 10, 20219:19 AM To:Cam ero,Tracie-Lee<Tracie-Lee.Camero@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: Hello, I'm curious to know how putting an affordable housing unit smack dab in the middle of sunrise ridge is OK? How that fair for all the people that paid a very high premium to buy and build there, now have to have section S or low income neighbors?? 1 his is absulotely disgusting,and im sure just announcement this has already lowered the sunrise property values.There's tons of land elsewhere. How did you manage to pick the highest value neighborhood in all of Hiio town to build affordable housing units in and destroy peoples property values?? I geometrician ASSOCIATES , E_ E_ C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geo m etrici a n a ssoc iates.com September 17,2021 Lexpen808@,gma1l.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,T 0 K(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Commenter: Thank you for your comment email dated August 10,2021. In answer to your specific comments: 1. "I'm curious to know how putting an affordable housing unit smack arab in the middle ofsunnse ridge is OK? How that,fair far all the people that paid a very high premium to br{v and build there, now have to have section 8 or low income neighbors?? This is absulotely disgusting, and im.sure just announcement this has already lowered the sunrise propero, values. there's Ions of land elsewhere. How did)'ou manage to pick the highest value neighborhood in all of Hilo town to build affordable housing units in and destroy peoples propert)� values??" First, the project is not located in the middle of Sunrise Ridge (or Sunrise Estates). It is located on adiacent State land. Affordable housing is a high priority at the national, State and County level. Low-income families and individuals are not undesirable land uses that need to be separated from well-off residents. There is no law, regulation or policy that requires geographic segregation of housing by income levels, and in fact,there are many laws than prohibit this. Several Mohouli Senior Housing affordable projects are already located just to the east, also adjacent to Sunrise Ridge,and this does not appear to have affected property values in this part of Hilo,which have soared in recent years. Despite your contention that there is lots of land elsewhere,there are very few State properties with suitable characteristics in East Hawaii. All necessary utilities are available,and for medical, government,social service,and recreational services and facilities are located nearby at various locations within central Hilo. We very much appreciate _your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions, please contact me at(808) 9619-7090. Sincerely, f�m%6 Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero, Hawaii County Planning KT❑p pyo Fern ..q. rr� �4P 'yn United States Department of the Interior simvrrrs .p Vi 7 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 HOTIOIL11U, Hawaii 96850 In Reply Refer To: September 3, 2021 01£PTF 00-2021-TA-0150 Tracie-Lee Camero, Planner Hawai`i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Technical Assistance for the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Development Environmental Assessment Hilo, Hawaii Dear Tracie-Lee Camero: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received your request for comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact(Draft EA) for the Hale Ola 0 Mohoul1 Affordable Housing Project(Project) on August 10, 2021. This project proposes to construct up to 90 affordable housing units on 9.09 acres at TMK(3)2-4-001:168, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Thank you for your efforts to address listed species and recommended avoidance and inInimiaati on methods referenced in our December 23, 2020 letter. We provide the fallowing comments for incorporation in your final Environmental Assessment and further consultation as necessary. This letter has been prepared under the authority of, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) as amended. The Draft EA did not address ae`o or Hawaiian stilts (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni). If project activities are likely to create permanent or temporary standing water, we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plans to avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian stilts: ■ In areas where stilts are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed Iimits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. ■ Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species' biology conduct Hawaiian stilt nest surveys where appropriate habitat occurs within the vicinity of the proposed project site prior to project initiation. Repeat surveys again within 3 days of project initiation and after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). If a nest or active brood is found: INTERIOR REGION 9 INTERIOR REGION 12 COLUMBLA—PACIFIC NORTHWEST PACIFIC ISLANDS IDAHO. MONTANA*, OREGOW. WASHINGTON AMERICAN SAMOA, GUAM. HAWAII. NORTHEPN 'PARTIAL MARIANA IS IAN OS Tracie-Lee Camero 2 ❑ Contact the Service within 48 hours for further guidance. ❑ Establish and maintain a 1 00-foot buffer around all active nests and/or broods until the chicks have fledged. Do not conduct potentially disruptive activities or habitat alteration within this buffer. ❑ Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species' biology present on the project site during all construction or earth moving activities until the chicks fledge to ensure that Hawaiian stilts and nests are not adversely impacted. We agree with your conclusion that `ope`ape`a or Hawaiian hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus semalur) may use the site, and that the absence of bat detections during one survey does not confirm absence of bats (Page 16). Infra-red scanners or other meticulous search techniques may be approved by the Service for use by qualified personnel to clear one or two trees for immediate removal; however,there are no agency-approved methods to ensure absence of bats to clear larger numbers of trees or whole stands. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plans: • Do not disturb,remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 feet tali during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). • Do not use barbed wire for fencing. Thank you for conducting an extensive plant survey (Table 1 beginning on page 18). The list you provided indicated that there are no endangered plants on site and no host plants for Blackburn's sphinx moth (Manduca blackburni). We recommend project proponents take action to avoid attraction of Blackburn's sphinx moth to the project location and prohibit Nicoiiana glauca(tree tobacco) from entering the site. Tree tobacco can grow greater than 3 feet tall in approximately 6 weeks. if it grows over 3 feet, the plants may become a host plant for Blackburn's sphinx moth. We therefore recommend that you incorporate the following measures into your project plan: • Remove any tree tobacco less than 3 feet tali. • Monitor the site every 4-to-6 weeks for new tree tobacco growth before, during. and after the proposed ground-disturbing activity. ❑ Monitoring for tree tobacco can be completed by any staff, such as groundskeeper or regular maintenance crew,provided with picture placards of tree tobacco at different life stages. The 'io or Hawaiian hawk(Buteo sohlarius), a species that was recently removed from the Federal list of threatened and endangered species, is known to occur in the area. While the Service no longer consults on the Hawaiian hawk, this species is still protected under Hawaii State regulations (H.R.S. §195D-4) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act(16 U.S.C. 703-712). Thank you for incorporating measures to avoid impacts to Hawaiian hawks (Page 19). Thank you for incorporating lighting shielded from view above for bode construction and permanent lighting to minimize impacts to endangered seabirds including the `ua`u or Hawaiian petrel (Plerodroina sandwicensis),the `ake`ake or Hawaii distinct population segment of the hand-rumped storm-petrel (Oceanodroma castro), and the `a`o or Newell's shearwater(Pzffnrr.r auricularis neivelh, Page 19)_ Tracie-Lee Camero 3 Thank you for your commitment to verify that no nene or Hawaiian Goose (Biwnla(=Nesochen) sandvicensis) are present prior to commencement of project activities (Page 19). To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian geese we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plans: • ❑o not approach, feed, or disturb Hawaiian geese. • If Hawaiian geese are observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist familiar with Hawaiian geese nesting behavior survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). • Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 154 feet of proposed project, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within the 150-foot radius after work begins. o In areas where Hawaiian geese are known to be present,post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Additional measures for housing developments common to all listed animal species that will reduce mortality or predation include the following: • Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. • Require all pets, including cats and dogs, to be on leash at all times outside. ■ Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations of rats and mongoose, which are invasive species and prey upon native and endangered species. • Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching, feeding, or disturbing wildlife. The Service recommends incorporating all applicable avoidance and minimization measures into your project design to avoid and minimize effects on protected species. If you determine the proposed project may affect federally listed species, we recommend you contact our office early in the planning process so that we may assist you with ESA compliance. Thank you for the opportunity to comment and for participating with us in the protection of our endangered species. If you have any questions, please contact Melissa Cady at melissa_cady(r fws.gov or by telephone at 808-933-6963. When referring to this project, please include this reference number: 01EPIF00-2021-TA-0450. Sincerely, Acting Island Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawaii Island Team cc: Pacific Islands Field Office Administrative Team Ron Terry, Geometrician Associates geometrician A S S O C I A T E S , L L C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassoc iates.com September 17,2021 Chelsie Javar-Salas Acting Island Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawaii Island Team Pacific islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard,Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola❑Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3) 2-4-001:158 Bear Ms. Javar-Salas: Thank you for the letter of September 3,2021,you provided to the Hawaii County Planning Department concerning the potential listed species present on the subiect property. I am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent, the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), which is a non-prof t dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of etderty, low- income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawaii. We thank you for noting the efforts of the proiect proponent to protect listed species Through survey and institution of various avoidance and mitigation measures where listed species had even a small potential to be impacted. It is expected that the Planning Department will adopt these measures as conditions of their recommendation. With respect to some of your specific comments: 1.Re'o or Hawaiian.stilts(Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), Our survey of the habitat indicates that there is essentially no potential for Hawaiian stilts utilizing the property. There is no standing water on the extremely well-drained and heavily forested 1881 lava flow in this area, and the geology of the property will preclude formation of standing water during construction.No standing water resulted during a previous project conducted by the project proponent directly makai, in an area with identical geology and slopes. No standing water features are planned as part of final project design. Nonetheless,the project proponent would be willing to require a contingency plan incorporating the conditions your letter proposes if and when actions by the contractor or the operator result in such standing water. 2.Infra-red scanners or other meticulous search techniques may be approved by the Service for use by qualified personnel to clear one or two trees far immediate removal: however-, there are no agency-approved methodv to ensure absence of'hats to clear larger numbers of trees or whole stands. We very much appreciate your evaluation of the efficacy of such techn iclues for clearing forested areas such as the subject property, In consideration of this, the project proponent agrees to simply prohibit disturbing, trimming or removing woody vegetation taller than 15 feet during the June 1 to September 15 bat pupping and rearing season, 3. Potentia!for tree tobacco and attraction of Manduca blackbrrrni. The high rainfall of the area should preclude infestations of tree tobacco, but the project proponent has been made aware of the need for this precaution, which it is planning to rigorously implement for a similar project in Kona. 4. Hawaiian hawk Thank you for acknowledging the project's measures to avoid impacts to the Hawaiian hawks,which remain listed by the State of Hawaii. 5.Lighting restrictions for seabirds. Thank you for acknowledging the project's measures to avoid impacts to listed Hawaiian seabirds. 6.Recommended measures for Nene or Hawaiian Goose (Rranta sandvicensis). As stated in the EA,although nene are not expected on the site,pre-construction will include another verification that no nene individuals or nests are present that could be disturbed by construction activity. If present,the standard minimization measures that you provided will be instituted, and construction will not proceed until they have left the area. 7.Standard measures far horsing developments that reduce mortality or predation: 1. Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. 2. Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations of rats and mongoose, which are invasive.species and preys upon native and endangered species. 3. Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching,,feeding, or disturbing wildlfe. Measures 1-2 are generally part of standard operating procedures at all County housing developments. The project proponents will seek assistance on obtaining appropriate signage for this particular area. Again,we very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions,please ccntact me at (808)969-7090. Sincerely. Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawaii County Planning Good afternoon Tracie-Lee: My name is Pat Baji from pay-Lum Rentals& Management, Inc. and I am the Property Manager for Sunrise Ridge Owners Association. The Board of Directors has requested a copy of the proposed street and housing unit plan. Do you have that information or can you direct me as to where I can obtain that information? I thank you for your time and efforts in this request. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 808-935-4152 or e-mail. Sincerely, Pat Baji Pat Bajl P: (808)935-4452 Association Mana« r PatBO)daylum.corn w«�v.dayluin.com hey Day-LUM entals&Management Inc fle geometrician ASSOC I A T E S , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7094 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.corn geometricianassoc iates.com September 17, 2021 Pat 1341'1, Association Manager Day-Lum Rentals and Management PatB(a,daylum_com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 M o h o u I I Affordable Housing Project,Island of Harvni`i,TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Ms. Baji: Thank you for your email to Tracie-Lee Camero of the Planning Department. In response to the request for the street and housing plan,please note that a concept plan is contained in the EA,which is available at by selecting the August 8,2021 edition of the Environmental Notice at: http:llhealth.hawaii. rod. v/oegcl. The development concept at this time is to create pocket neighborhoods where clusters of units are arranged around central greens. Under this concept,the units would typically be single-family dwellings,duplexes, and up to four-plex structures not exceeding two stories in lie ight. An illustration of this development type for this site is shown in Figure 4_ However,as stated in the Draft EA, this concept is dependent on securing the necessary funding and may be altered if appropriate funding is not secured. Thank you for you inquiry,and if have any questions,please contact me at(808)969-7090. Sincerely, pm&�J Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero, Hawaii County Planning From: Isaac ❑jukwu<ojukwuisaac@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday,August 10,20218:43 AM To: Camero,Tracie-Lee<Tracie-Lee.Camero@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli I just wanted know more about the low income project. geometrician ASSOC EAT ES , LLC integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7490 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassoc iates.com September 17, 2021 Isaac Ojukwu of ukwuisaactq,gmai 1.eom Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. Ojukwu: Thank you for your email dated August 10, 2021, in which you inquired about the project. A great deal of information is contained in the EA, which is available at by selecting the August 8,2421 edition of the Environmental Notice at: littp://health.hawai1.gov/oegc/. 1n summary,the development is to provide affordable rentals for seniors and families. One method of achieving this is to create pocket neighborhoods where clusters of units are arranged around central greens. Under this concept,the units would typically be single-family dwellings,duplexes,and up to four-plex structures not exceeding two stories in height.The project is expected to be ready for construction in late 2022 and completed mid-2024. Please contact Keith Kato, Executive Director of the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation,at keith.hicdc(ci!yrmail.com or 808-319-2422 if you have more specific questions. Sincerely, fes► Ron Terry,Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato,HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawaii County Planning From: K.M.F . rkirb1@hotmai1.com> Sent: Wednesday,August 11, 20217:58 AM To: Camera,Tracie-Lee Tracie-Lee.Camero@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: Location for Affordable Housing Project Hello Tracy, I own some land up near Volcano in Royal Hawaiian Estates. This is gust me making a suggestion about a future site for another round of affordable housing for the citizens of Hawaii. Starting at the intersection of Makaala St. and Railroad Ave. There are a series of 10ac. lots owned by Hawaiian Home Lands. The area would be south of Yamada and Sons Quarry and just west of Panaewa Drag Strip Road. It's close to Walmart, Target and Home Depot. It's also close to a transfer station and near the airport. For people on limited resources, this kind of convenience is crucial. The area is big enough for homes and future commercial development. Please consider this site at the next P&J meeting. Mahalo, Kirby F. geometrician ASSOC iATES , E_ !_ C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geo m etrici a n a ssoc i ates.Com September 17,2021 Kirby F'. kirb 1(&,,hotm ai l.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale❑la 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of HawaN,TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Kirby: Thank you for your comment email dated August 11,2021, suggesting an additional affordable liousing site at Maka`ala Street and Railroad Avenue in Hilo. I am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent,the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC),which is a non-profit dedicated to developing affordable housing that has assisted in the development of elderly, low-income and transitional housing throughout the Island of Hawaii. As you noted, the land you suggested is under the control of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands. It is the prerogative of that Department to utilize the land for purposes that best suit their mission. This of course is focused on making land available for beneficiary housin;_=. Thank you for your inquiry. If you have any questions about the EA far the Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, please contact me at (808)969-7090 Sincerely, f�m�� Ron Terry, Print[pal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero, Hawaii County Planning Mori, Ashley Subject: FW: kukLlau St From: milt car<miLkona@hotmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 10, 2021 12:51 PM To:Camera,Tracie-Lee eTracie-Lee.Camero@I awaiicounty.gov> Subject: kukuau st DEAR TRACIE, IT SEEMS TO BE A GOOD CONCEPT PROJECT TO SOVE AFFORDABLE OR LESS COSTLY HOUSING- AT MOHOULI ST.I HOWEVER, MY CONCERN IS ABOUT KUKUA.0 ST. AND HOW IT EH5 AND THEN CONTINUES IN THE HI LO HILLSIDE SUBDIVISION. WHY IS THAT? RUMOR HAS IT THAT IS WAS AN AGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY FOR EVENTUAL CONNECTION OF BOTH KUKUAU ST. AND THEREFORE ALLOWED THE PASSING OF THE PROJECT TO GO AHEAD. CONNECTION COST TO BE BORN BY DEVELOPER. IS THAT TRUE? IF YOU CAN'T ANSWER PLEASE SEND ME A CONTACT PERSON WHO COULD ANSWER THERE TYPE OF QUESTIONS? THANK YOU, ONA OSHIJO z geometrician ASSOCIATES , E_ E_ C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geometricianassoc iates.com September 17,2021 Ona Oshijo m i l i ko na(l h otm ai 1.com Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola O Mohonii Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Ms. Oshijo: Thank you for your comment email dated August 10, 2021. I am responding to this from the standpoint of the project proponent, the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC). In answer to your specific comments: 1. Concern for Kukuau Street acrd plans for connection to Hilo Hillside.Subdivision.Agreement with developer that allowed the project to go through as long as connection to Hila Hillside was mode, with cost borne by developer. We assume that by"developer"and "passing of the project"you are referring to the Hilo Hillside Subdivision, and not the Hale Ola O,Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. There is certainly no connection between the extension ofKukuau Street and Hale Ola O Mohouli. We are unaware of any arrangements related to other developments. It is our understanding that the Plann in-, Department will respond to you separately concerning your question. Thank you for your inquiry. If you have any questions about the EA for the Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, please contact me at (808)969-7090. Sincerely, f�ox� Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawai'i County Planning From: Dayna Wong-Otis <dayna.wongotis@)gmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 6, 20218:30 AM To: tracie-lee.camero@hawaiicounty.gov; rterry@hawaii.rr.com Subject: Comments on EA for TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. Terry, This letter is in response to the draft environmental assessment prepared for the Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project. Below are a few comments. The impact of traffic to the area with the addition of this project. With our home being on the corner, we recently had an accident in which someone crashed into our rock wall causing rocks to fly into our property and damaging our property. We were very fortunate that we were not outside at the time of the accident, as the debris could have seriously hurt someone. We also already deal with a lot of speeding and traffic in our area which makes it dangerous for anyone who wishes to walk, bike or exercise. The added traffic worries us, especially as parents to a young child. Control measures for pests. Our area is known to have frequent visitors such as wild pigs and rodents. If the area is cleared, these pests will attempt to find a new home and could cross into our property. In the past, our neighbors have hired help to trap these animals. Thank you, Dustin and Dayna Otis 851 Kukuau St. Hilo, HI 96720 geometrician A S S 0 C I A T E S , L L C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geo m etric T a n a ssoc i ates.Com September 17,2021 Dustin and Dayna Otis Dayna.wongoti s(7u,gm ai l.cam Subject: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TNIK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Otis: Thank you for your comment email dated September 6, 2021. 1 am responding to this from the standpoint of the proiect proponent, the Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC). In answer to your specific comments: 1. Traffic in the area, including speeding,pedestrian and traffic safety. The Draft EA discusses traffic issues in detail. To summarize the major findings, the Hale Ola O Mohouli development would generate 48 vehicles per hour(vph) during the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68 vph,with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. This is a very small fraction of the traffic on Mohouli Street. The additional generated traffic is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations in the vicinity. Assisting in reducing traffic impacts to minimal levels is a proposed driveway at the mauka end of the property,which will be restricted to right- inlright-Out movements. This will help handle many inbound trips and also mauka-bound outbound trips,and will reduce the number of vehicles entering and existing at Kupuna Place.As for traffic on r our part of Ktikoau Street,while it is likely that some mauka-bound traffic will cross Kukuau Street.effects to Kukuau Street residences are unlikely. The absence of a signal on Kukuau Street at Komohana Street, and the presence of a signal at Mohouli Street,makes it counterintuitive to utilize a roundabout route through Kukuau Street to access makki destinations in Hilo.Therefore,no appreciable increase in traffic to Kukuau Street between Mohouli Street and Komohana Street is expected. While it is acknowledged that pedestrians and bicyclists utilize the shoulder along the more than one-mile length of Mohouli Street for transportation and exercise,the project does not significantly increase traffic and creates just one additional right-in/night-out driveway that pedestrians and bicyclists must cross. 2. Control measures far pests.If the area is cleared, these pests will attempt to find a new home and could cross into the Sunrise Estates subdivision. As stated in the Draft EA, HICDC recognizes neighbors' concern that feral pigs,chickens and rats displaced by the loss of habitat would relocate to his yard.However, it is more likely that the conversion from forest to urban uses where feral animals are more easily controlled would reduce the number of feral animals transiting from the property to neighboring residences. Keith Kato, Executive Director of HICDC,has stated that if transiting or relocated pests become an issue during construction.HICDC is willing to work with you to find a solution. We very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions, please contact me at(808) 969-7090. Sincerely_ Ron Terry. Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato,HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawaii County Planning QQ VIAT19k o-AArA • 19 � ` DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII e�rrewr� �r4 345 KEKOANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAI'i 96720 TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 - FAX(808)961-8657 September 3, 2021 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern, Director ATTENTION: Ms.Tracie-Lee Camero, Planner Planning Department FROM: Keith K. Okamoto, Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii Tax Map Key 2-4-001:158 We have reviewed the subject Draft Environmental Assessment and have the following comments. Prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project,the Department will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval. After review of the calculations,the Department will determine a water commitment deposit amount, prevailing facilities charge(subject to change)to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. Construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements must also be submitted for review and approval. Any meter(s)serving the proposed project will require the installation of a reduced principle type backflow prevention assembly within five feet of the meter on private property. The Department must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070, extension 256. Sincerely yours, �4 Vt�"* Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dmj copy—Mr. Ron Terry,Geometrician Associates, LLC . . . Water, Our,Most (Precious(Rfsouree. . , Kji Wai q ane. . . The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity prodder and employer. geometrician ASSOC iATES , E_ !_ C integrating geographic science and planning phone: (808) 969-7090 10 Hina Street Hilo Hawaii 96720 rterry@hawaii.rr.com geo m etrid a n a ssoc i ates.Com September 17,2021 Keith Okamoto,Manager Hawaii County Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street, Suite 20 Hilo HI 96720 Subject: Comments on Draft En,6ronmental Assessment(DEA), Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Housing Project,Island of Hawaii,TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 Dear Mr. Okamoto: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 3,2021. The developer understands that prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project, DWS will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations. After this,DWS will detennine a water commitment deposit amount.prevailing facilities charge (subject to change) to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. HICDC will be submitting construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements.The development will include the installation of a reduced principle-type backflow prevention assembly within five feet of the meter on the subject property. It is also understood that DWS must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. We very much appreciate your review of the Draft EA. If you have any questions, please contact me at(808) 969-7090. Sincerely, Pm& Ron Terry, Principal Geometrician Associates Cc: Keith Kato, HICDC: Tracie-Lee Camero,Hawaii County Planning Hale Ula U Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 2 Traffic Impact Assessment Report [This page intentionally left blanl►[ ' r r • `� -• 'Wainaku is , %ula'inaiwi Island ,. coconut Island Reeds Island' T , f _ rArrr. r ��� �.:. .• ,; •• t 11...E �, 09F porpTil Rd. iAm IV Vit'-�..- 11 ►/•F. f•w f�.A _ r5r. " - -. ...�i H - ' ��'c �,���.i��la5_' � '�.•_ +�'�`gip i ' -.. 6 4 It .+e• � ..`a_ ..fir r• Transportation Impact Assessment Report Hale Ola o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Hilo, Hawaii November 2020 Prepared for: Hawaii [slant Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 204 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 (808) 987-6750 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 (808) 521-5031 Project Reference: 60644974 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS......................................................................................2 2.1 Site Description.................................................................................................2 2.2 Roadway Conditions ..................................... ...................................................3 2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions ...............................................................................3 2.2.2 Intersection Conditions...............................................................................7 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions...................................................... .............9 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities.............................................................................. ....9 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities................................................. .--.....................9 2.4 Public Transit Conditions.................................................................................10 2.5 Transportation Conditions................................. .-- .--...........11 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and Adjustment..................................................11 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes.................................................13 2.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations...............................................................13 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS...................-I--......................................................---15 3.1 Proposed Development............. ....... ............ ....... ....... ....... .............15 3.2 Future Roadway Cond tions............................................................................15 3.2.1 Roadways................................................................................................15 3.2.2 Intersections..................... ............... ............................... ....... .......15 3.3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions...............................15 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities.................................................................................15 3.3.2 Bicycle Facilities............................................ ..........................................15 3.3.3 Public Transit............. ....... .............................. .--...........15 3.4 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Background Traffc .......................................16 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth ................................................---.....................16 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center.......... ...... ....17 3.5 Vehicular Trips Generated by Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development ... ........19 3.6 Projected Year 2025 T,affic Volumes..............................................................20 3.6.1 Hale Ola O Mohouli Trip Distribution and Assignment..............................20 AOcom i November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.6.2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................... .....20 3.8 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations ................................23 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................24 4.1 Summary.._ .................................................. ............ .......24 4.2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place....................................24 4.3 Recommendations ..........................................................................................26 5.0 REFERENCES........... ............. ............. ............. .....................................27 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Site Location .........................................................................................1 Figure 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan........................................................2 Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street..................................3 Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street............ ............... ......._4 Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North.............................................5 Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North................................6 Figure7 Kupuna Place....................................................................................................6 Figure 8 Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place Intersection............................•............................7 Figure 9 Mohouli Street/Komohana Street Intersection ...................................................8 Figure 10 Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street Intersection.......................................................9 Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route ........................................10 Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................12 Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Volumes ...18 Figure 14 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Hale Ola O Mohouli Generated TrafficVolumes....................................................................................................... .....21 Figure 15 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Total Traffic Volumes ..............22 Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection ....25 Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-MohoulilKupuna Intersection.....25 List of Tables Table 1 Adjusted Existing Weekday Peak Hour tntersection Operations.......................14 Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes......... ....... ....... ....... ....... .............16 Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola 0 Mohoul Affordable Residential Development............................................. ............. ............................................. ..19 Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary.......................................................................................................................23 AEC'OM ii November 2020 • ■ ■- - of - ■ •■ . • ■ f■• a ■ - •. • - a 7.WalriakU9WNi6aku • ,r e �__.-::: •raula'inami Island _ �mConut island Flos Reeds Island � _-r;�, :�+�� •.�_-'� IF Ilk wL Qt y•:►i'M;'�' - „ 3rA� ail '•�: di�i '� C- w.W rt �y ,�.� �� `,• -:qtr ..�;_ � ■ f � - .1� �['-Jai s 14f{f� l _-i.- ,�� N M �14}♦ 40L It X. ll -F /•'dew' 2w.: 'i:�x,.� � = o, r' � �r ,,.. iii ■d.:a� �, ,Y. aY.� � - ;. :� i'+•', 'i. !'_' a� -P.. .�i, is Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Site Description The proposed Hale Dia ❑ Mohouli affordable residential development will be on parcel TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The currently vacant site is located between existing single-family residential development on Kukuau Street and the future County of Hawai'i Fire Department Dispatch Center. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. The Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center site. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2. 1 1 1 Future } CourEty of Hawaii Proposed Hale Ola D Mohouli l=ire.Department Existing Mohouli ._ Affordable Housing Expansion ispatch Center Senior Residences ` f Proposed Right-intRight-out Driveway. `�, �� ���_ti_�� so--=•Y- Mohouli Street = - -- Figure 2 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Conceptua Site Plan ►Ocom 2 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.2 Roadway Conditions Key roadways in this study are Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, Kukuau Street, and Kupuna Place. 2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions Mohouli Street Mohouli Street provides mauka to makai access between Kaumana Drive and Kilauea Street. The older portion of the roadway, makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). The roadway was extended mauka from Komohana Street to the Kaumana Drive/Ainako Avenue intersection in 2002. The newer section of roadway has wide paved shoulders that could be used to widen Mohouli Street to four lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The lands adjoining this section of roadway are currently mostly vacant. The new section of roadway provides residents of Kaumana Drive and Ainako Avenue with an alternate access route to the south and west sections of Hilo. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the newer segment of Mohouli Street in the vicinity of the Kupuna Place access to the existing Mohouli Senior Residences. Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street A COM 3 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report A i Figure 4 Mohouh Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street Komohana Street Komohana Street runs in a general north to south direction between Waianuenue Avenue and Ainaola Drive. The portion of roadway south of Puainako Street generally passes through residential areas while the northern section adjoins vacant lands. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Komohana Street serves as a commuter route for residents in the south and west sections of Hilo to reach downtown Hilo, Hilo Hospital, and Hilo High School. Figure 5 illustrates Komohana Street at Mohouli Street looking north. ►LCQM 4 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report r r 3 'f Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North Kukuau Street Kukuau Street is a two-lane County minor collector road. The older roadway section, makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and intersects with Kapi'olani Street. The newer roadway, mauka of Komohana Street, provides access to a mauka residential subdivision. The extension of Mohou i Street created a new intersection on this roadway. The posted speed limit on Kukuau Street is 35 mph in the vicinity of Mohouli Street. Figure 6 shows Kukuau Street at Mohouli Street looking north. ►LCOM 5 November 2020 Hale ❑la ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 35 Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mchouli street Looking North Kupuna Place Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences Figure 7 shows Kupuna Place at its intersection with Mohouli Street. 1 V Figure 7 Kupuna Place ►LCOM 6 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.2.2 Intersection Conditions Traffic data was collected at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection and upcated at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections: Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place Kupuna Place intersects Mohouli Street at an unsignalized "T"-intersection with STOP- sign control on the Kupuna Place leg of the intersection. The Kupuna Place approach is configured with a single lane, although there is sufficient width so that right-turning and left-turning vehicles can move concurrently. There is a refuge in the painted Mohouli Street median for vehicles turning left out of Kupuna Place onto Mohouli Street. The eastbound Mohouli Street approach is a single-lane approach with a median left- turn lane for traffic turning int Kupuna Place. The westbound Mohouli Street approach is configured with a through lane and an exclusive right-turr lane. There are no crosswalks across the approaches to this intersection. Figure 8 is a photograph of the Kupuna Place approach to the intersection. - - A Figure 8 Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place Intersection Mohouli Street/Komohana Street The Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection is a four-legged, signalized intersection located east of the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Figure 9 shows the intersection configuration. ALCOM 7 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 9' 3 f yti c� y . Ma-hc)uii Street P, 0 1� ri�'r—• ui Figure 9 Mahouli Street'Komohana Street;ntersection All intersection approaches are configured with a single through lane and exclusive left- turn lanes. The eastbound Mohouli Street and northbound Komohana Street approaches also have exclusive right-turn lanes. The westbound Mohouli Street and southbound Komohana Street approaches have shared through/right-turn lanes. The westbound, southbound, and northbound approaches have protected/permiss.ve left-turn turn signal phasing, while the eastbound approach has protected left-turn signal phasing. There are crosswalks and pedestrian signals on all intersection approaches. Mohou;i Street/KukUau Street The Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersection is a four-legged, unsignalized intersection with a STOP-sign control on the Kukuau Street intersection approaches. Figure 10 shows the intersection configuration. Both Mohouli Street approaches are configured with exclusive left-turn lanes and shared through/right-turn lanes. The Kukuau Street approaches are configured a shared left- through-right lanes, although there are wide, paved shoulders that would allow right- turning vehicles to bypass vehicles waiting to turn left or proceed straight through the intersection. There are crosswalks across all approaches of the intersection. ►LCom 8 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 92 f r . essrrrrrr:tr_ i ✓✓WYj } Figure 10 Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street Intersection 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities The intersections on Mohouli St,eet at Komohana Street and Kukuau Street have crosswalks across all approaches. The Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection does not have crosswalks. There are no sidewalks along Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. There are wide, paved shoulders and it was observed that they are used by pedestrians as sidewalks. There are sidewalks along the internal roadways within the Mohouli Senior Residences, including on Kupuna Place. 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities There are no designated bicycle facilities along Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, or Kukuau Street in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli site. However, as noted previously, the roadways in the area have wide, paved shoulders that are utilized by bicyclists as well as pedestrians. ►LCOM 9 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report .� Public Transit Conditions The public transit service on the island of Hawaii is provided by the County's Hele-On Bus system. Figure 11 illustrates the closest existing transit service routes in the vicinity of the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli site. At this time, the site is not served by fixed transit routes. It was observed that the senior daycare located within the existing Mohouli Senior Residences provides shuttle bus service to some of its participants. INTRA-HILO KAUMANA Coconut Island All I Irilnikri• a rrro Hale fila 0 Mohouli Site Figure 11 He le-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route A=COM 10 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.5 Transportation Conditions 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and Adjustment Due potentially atypical conditions due to COVI D-19 related restrictions, alternative methods for establishing base condition traffic volumes were used. Base t,affic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street and the Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections were obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project, September 2011. Vehicular turning movement, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were conducted at the Mohouli StreetlKupuna Place intersection. These counts were conducted for the AM and PM peak periods on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 and Wednesday, October 21, 2020 from 6:00 AM to 8:30 AM for the AM peak period and 3:15 PM to 5:30 PM for the PM peak period. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) link traffic volumes on Mohouli Street and on Komohana Street for years 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 were obtained and used to adjust the traffic turning movement counts to an estimate of what the base traffic volumes would be without the effects of COVID-19. These HDOT counts were also used to help estimate future ambient traffic growth rates. Figure 12 summarizes the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street, the Mohouli StreetlKupuna Place, and the Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections. The weekday AM peak hour was estimated to occur from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour was determined to occur from 3:15 PM to 4:15 PM. The traffic count summary shee_s from the 2011 study, the recently counted Mohouli StreetlKupuna Place intersection, and the HDOT counts are included in Appendix A. A=Com 1 1 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohog|Affordable Resideng@ Development Transportation Imd Assessment Report � t & ¢�� % �� T + /# ■ a/ II� � / 0 @ \ Aa s % o° LU ®« « ■ e �� � ■ ��� $� % § ■ � \ $ | f£k{■ LU - ;=fE ■ § °° +G ■ � � \ )kM U- tee$ U- Cr ƒ0 ■ ƒ Y. I VC, 0 \ klei'r ���c § | o 415 k \ E / g E � .« I F 2 k f ° 2 14 44) \ 21 * Figure 12Adjusted Y Year 2020&U and PM Peak HDE Traffic Volumes �L=C0m 12 Nov mbe f2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian VOIUrnes Low pedestrian and bicycle volumes were observed. Both the pedestrian and bicyclists were observed using the paved shoulders on Mohouli Street. During the AM peak hour 1 bicycle and 7 pedestrians were observed. Most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. During the PM peak hour 1 bicycle and 0 pedestrians were observed. A greater number of pedestrians were observed later with the largest number, 13, occurring from 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM. As in the AM peak hour, most of the pedestr ans observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. The pedestrian and bicycle counts are included in Appendix A with the traffic count summary sheets. There are separate worksheets for the pedestrian and bicycle counts. 2.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations The three intersections were analyzed using the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour turning movement volumes and existing intersection configurations. Table 1 summarizes the calculated intersection delay and level of service (LOS) for the weekday AM and PM commuter peak hour time periods. The intersections were analyzed using the unsignalized intersection capacity methods described in the Highway Capacity Manual. Sixth Edition [HCM1 through the Synchro/SimTraffic software. The Synchro analysis worksheets are included in Appendix s. As shown in Table 1, the key turning movements at each intersection operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) for peak hour conditions. The left-turn movement from Kupuna Place to eastbound Mohouli Street reflects analyses conducted assuming a vehicle having to execute the turn in one maneuver. As noted previously, there is a median left-turn refuge area that allows vehicles to complete the left-turn maneuver in a two-step process, making the left-turn movement much easier. Assuming that vehicles must complete the left-turn in one maneuver results in a conservatively high delay. LOS for unsignalized intersections is a qualitative index based on a quantitative performance measure such as intersection delay to express the relative level of traffic operations. Definitions of LOS are included in Appendix C. A COM 13 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Table 1 Adjusted Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Operations AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection/Movement Delay LDS Delay LDS MohoutilFtukuau EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 8.3 A WB Mohouli LT 8.5 A 8.0 A NB Kukuau Combined 20,4 C 14.8 B SB Kukuau Combined 12.3 8 15.3 C MohouliMulouna EB Mohouli LT T9 A 81 A SB Kupuna LT 18,1 C 18,7 C 5B Kupuna RT 9,8 A 11,0 B MohouliiKomohana 33.6 C 38.6 D Notes; belay is seconds/vehicle Analyses performed using 5ynchro Version 11 and summarized consistent with HCM,6th Edition,parameters ► =Com 14 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Proposed Development The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development proposes up to 90 affordable residential units on parcel TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. A conceptual site pian is shown in Figure 2 of this report. Access to the site is proposed via a right-inlright-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. The Hale Dla 0 Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center site. Assumed project time frame is five years in the future. Future Roadway Conditions 3.2.] Roadways No changes to Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, Kupuna Place, or Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. Mohouli Street, in the vicinity of the proposed project, has wide paved shoulders that would enable widening in the future if justified by background traffic growth. 3.2.2 Intersections No changes to the existing intersections of Mohouli Street/Komohana Street, Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place, or Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. 3.3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities No changes to the existing pedestrian facilities at the locations evaluated in this study are assumed. 1.3.. Bicycle Facilities As noted previously, bicyclists traveling along Mohouli Street either share the road with vehicular traffic or use the wide paved shoulders. No changes are assumed for within the time frame of this study. 3.3.3 Public Transit Hele-On bus routes documented in the existing conditions section of this report are assumed to remain the same within the time frame of this evaluation. A=Com 15 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.4 Projected Year ZOZS Peak Hour Background Traffic Background traffic refers to traffic unrelated to the proposed Hale Ola a Mohouli affordable housing development. Background traffic was projected for Year 2025 conditions based on an assumed five-year time frame for the proposed development. There are two main components to the background traffic volumes; • growth in traffic on Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, and Kukuau Street; • traffic generated by the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Table 2 compares peak hour traffic volumes counted from 2007 to 2020 at the intersections evaluated in this study. As shown, traffic volumes have remained relatively consistent over the past 10 plus years on Mohouli Street and Komohana Street. With the exception of the 2020 counts, the traffic volume data are pre-COVI❑-19. Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Roadway Segment Eastbound Westbound Total Eastbound Westbound Total Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 498 290 788 272 545 817 2007 count Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 558 325 893 322 485 807 2009 count Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 495 242 737 315 457 772 2020 count Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 470 245 715 290 527 817 2007 count Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 535 255 790 300 485 785 2009 count Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 516 261 777 345 482 827 2020 count Northbound Southbound Total Northbound Southbound Total Komohana:South of Mohouli 1,215 430 1,645 605 890 1,495 2007 count Komohana:South of Mohouli 1,135 455 1,590 615 930 1,545 2009 count Komohana:South of Mohouli 1.102 435 1,537 618 867 1,485 ,'2019 HDQT Note:AM Peak Hour:7:00 AM-8:00 AM.PM Peak Hour:4:00-5:00 PM+va-ies slightly) Counts 2007.2009,and 2019 are prior to COVID-19 conditions Based on the historic traffic data, it is judged that current background traffic growth will be based on new projects occurring in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola Q Mohouli A COM 16 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report affordable residential project. Many large projects were previously expected to occur by 2024 but have not. If they do proceed, an update of their entitlements will likely be needed. Therefore, growth in the year 2025 peak hour forecast of traffic at the intersections evaluated in this study is based on likely projects that will occur in the immediate vicinity of the Hale Ola O Mohouli project. A project that meets that criterion is the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center located on the parcel adjacent to the Hale Ola O Mohouli project. Traffic from the Fire Dispatch project will be added to the adjusted existing year 2420 traffic to forecast the year 2025 background traffic. 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center Forecast of traffic generated by the County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center was obtained from a previous study entitled Traffic Impact Analysis Report, County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex. February 2008. This is considered a conservatively high estimate of traffic generated as the land use assumed in the report contained more than just a dispatch center. Figure 13 illustrates the projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movement volumes for the background traffic. A=Com 17 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report yw. � oho ° Gr.r�srr f ca �7 ❑r1 c,L ip `o H W 9ti' dry ` c epi v r pr°�ga �y Wow ❑ a o a Una pl ►� 7 k KuP J a U 4 E Q_ J ~ __H o of L ❑ � E oto a p m a o y o0 2.2¢ w 0. 0 'ss ❑ LU 2 ry C1, a. Kt ❑ z a pe�sy J Q 3 Ti+ N Q L a ❑ a aLU n a ir o U � ) o J� Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Background Traffic Volumes ►LCom 18 November 2020 Hale Gla 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.5 Vehicular Trips Generated by Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Table 3 summarizes the land use and estimated vehicular volumes that would be generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development. The vehicular volume is based on the trip generation rates documented in the Institute of Transportation (iTE) publication, Trip Generation, 101" Edition. Equations for AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic was used in this calculation. The trip generation equations for Category 210 (Apartment) was used to estimate the vehicular traffic generated by the site. The index used as a predictor was the maximum number of dwelling units proposed. Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Developmen` ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Intensity Cate or g y In Out In Out Multi-family 90 D.U. 210 10 38 44 24 Residential Notes:AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are in vehicles per hour.Trip Generation is the estimation of vehicular traffic based on equations documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication,Trip Generation, 107h Edition. For Category 220-Apartment,the trip generation equations are: AM:T=0.49 (X)+ 3.73 (20% Entering/80% Exiting) PM: T= 0.55 (X) t 17.65 (65%Entering/35%Exiting) wlieie T- Lrarric volur►aes (vehicles per hour), X= dwelIing ur:its D.U. - dwelling units ►4=Com 19 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.6 Projected Year 2fl25 Traffic Volumes 3.6.1 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Trip Distribution and Assignment The projected Year 2025 vehicular volumes generated by the Hale Ola 0 Mohouli project summarized in Table 3 were directionally distributed and assigned to the roadway network. The directional distribution of turns onto and from Mohouli Street was based on the traffic turning movement conducted October 20-21, 2020. Turning movements at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections utilized the turning movement patterns in the adjusted existing turninc movements. The resulting projected Year 2025 traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Dla 0 Mohouli development are summarized in Figure 14. 3.6,2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The projected traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development summarized in figure x were combined with the projected Year 2025 background traffic summarized in Figure y to obtain the total Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes. The total projected Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 15. ►4=Com 20 November 2020 Hale O& O Mohog|Affordable ResidenH& Development Transportation Imd Assessment Report � 2 % Ca % 4%N0 # aa� 2 / Sk ■ r®° ` 0 > / u s E ® a 9 � R 2 � ■ � a « en �- « : ) 0 �L z \ � |f �i■ � T2 ƒj o !J ���■ o \ ■ « 0 ~!> 2;§k -2 < J 0 / 7 � o � � LU CL CL zA, « a_ f » � < � ` #� ■ � ~® 0 K .« 2 2 a K « L \ \ � ¥ / \ I ) & Figure # Projected Year 2Qs AM 2d PM Peak Ho*Hale Ola O Moho&Generated Traffic V Q rnes �L=C0m 21 Nov mbef2020 Hale O& O Mohog|Affordable Resideng@ Development Transportation Imd Assessment Report � § tLp @ , - � � � & » / % 0 � e /a % ¥ �aCall, � k\k ° ¥ �1 ® w 10, | �� % § -J »■ 0 §)) [I § !G ko■ k � ■ ■ +� IM 03 \ �5 0,0 R 2 ® fƒ 0 ƒe`er 4 ■ t °2 0 LU z� £tom ■ IL Oe 2 } �+� � 2 $ « � j � f C k ■ - }_ ® 3 C « Uk _ ( ) 0 « 0 \ z - + ' ƒ ka 0 9 A� Ix E ) * Figure 15 ProjectedYe Year 2025AMand Pd Peak Hour Total TraVolumes �L=£OM 22 Nov mbe f2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.8 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations The projected Year 2425 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development were used to evaluate future intersection operations. The signalized and unsignalized HCM 51' Edition methods as implemented by the Synchro analysis software was used. Table 4 summarizes the results of the existing 2420, year 2025 without project, and year 2025 with project intersection analyses for AM and PM peak hour conditions. Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2425 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2025 wlo 2025 2025 w/o 2025 1ntersectionJMovement x sting Project wlPro'ect Xisting Project wlPro'ect Delay Las Dela LOS Delay LOS Dela Las Dela Los Delay LOS MohouliiKukuau EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8.3 A 8.3 A 8.3 A WB Mohouli LT 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.0 A 8.1 A 8.1 A NB Kukuau Combined 20.4 C 20.6 C 20.9 C 14.8 B 14.9 B 150 C SB Kukuau Combined 12.3 B 12.4 B 12.5 B 15.3 C 15.4 C 15.5 C Hale Ola O Mohoul[RURO SB R11R0 RT na r.a na na 9.9 A na na na na 11.4 B Mohouli)Ku una EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 8.1 A 8.1 A 8.7 A 8.7 A 8.8 A SB Kupuna LT 18.1 C 18.7 C 21.1 C 18.7 C 22.1 C 26.6 ❑ SB Kupuna RT 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.9 A 11.0 B 11.7 B 12.1 B MohoulilKomohana 33.6 C 33.7 C 38.6 ❑ 36.6 D 36.8 D 38.6 ❑ Notes: Delay is in seconds/vehicle Analyses performed using Synchro Version 11 and summarized consistentwith HCM 6th Edition parameters na=not applicable As shown, the Hale Ola O Mohouli affordable residential development has relatively small traffic impacts at the intersections evaluated. The added traffic does contribute to a slight increase in overall intersection delay at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection, and because the overall intersection delay due to current and projected background traffic volumes at this intersection are near the threshold for LOS C, the slight increase in delay moves this intersection to LOS D, usually considered acceptable to urban peak hour conditions, ►LCom 23 November 2020 Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Summary The proposed Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli development is a proposed affordable residential development that expands the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo. It will contain up to 90 multi-family residential units and is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The proposed Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli development is projected to generate 48 vehicles per hour (vph) during the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour, it is expected to generate 68 vph with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. The additional traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola 4 Mohouli development is forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations at the intersections in the vicinity of the proposed development. A proposed driveway with traffic movements restricted to right-!nlright-out movements will be effective in reducing traffic activity on Kupuna Place. The existing roadway infrastructure would be able to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola ❑ Mahouli development. "t.`T Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place The projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movements were used to evaluate the need for a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Currently, this intersection operates as a two-way STOP-sign controlled intersection with the STOP- sign on the Kupuna Place approach. Figure 16 and Figure '17 show graphic evaluations of the peak hour traffic signal warrant as documented in the Manual on Uniform Control Devices (MUTCD), 2009 as revised, for the projected year 2025 AM peak hour and the 2025 PM peak hour time periods.. As shown, in Figure 17, the projected year 2025 PM peak hour volumes are closer to warrarting a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection than the projected year 2025 AM peak hour volume. Even for the projected year 2025 PM peak hour, the peak hour traffic signal warrant in not satisfied. The projected year 2025 PM peak hour traffic on Mohouli Street is 910 vehicles per hour. To satisfy the peak hour traffic warrant, this volume would need to increase to approximately 1,000 vehicles per hour, a 10 percent increase. Given the fairly stable traffic volume level on Mohouli Street between year 2007 and year 2020, it is anticipated that this 10 percent increase would require growth over a substantial number of years or would be caused by a dramatic increase in development n the vicinity of the intersection. A=Com 24 November 2020 Hale Dla 0 Mohouh Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Year 2025 AM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3.Peak Hour(70%Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10.000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) 400 2 OR MORE LANES&2 CA MORE LANES MINOR 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE STREET am HIGHER- 1 LANE&1 LANE VOLUME APPROACH- 200 VPH 100 - 100, 7s• 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 low 1100 1200 13Q0 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR IvPHI 'Note-10o vph applies a5 the rower Threshold vplllma W a miner-stmal approach wilh Iwo or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the rower threshold volume for a rrunar-slreer approach wnh one cane. Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection Year 2025 PM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70% Factory (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 1x,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) 400 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES MINOR 2 VR MORE LANES&1 LANE STREET 300 HIGHER- 1 LANE&1 LANE VOLUME APPROACH- Baa VPH 100 100' 75' 300 400 500 6010 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 13M MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR(VPH) 'Note:100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume tar a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mchoull/Kupuna Intersection ► =Com 25 November 2020 Hale ❑la ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 4.3 Recoiniiiendations The following improvements are recommended for the proposed Hale ❑la ❑ Mohouli development: ■ Implement the proposed right-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street. As part of the implementation, restripe part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane into the Hale ❑la ❑ Mohouli development; • Assure that future major development occurring in the area with traffic impacts to the segment of Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street provide an evaluation of traffic signal warrant for the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. A=COM 26 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 5.0 REFERENCES Hawaii Island Hele-On Bus - Hele-On - A Service of the County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency. (2020). Retrieved from http://www.heleorbus.org/ Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. '210 Single Family Detached Housing.' to Trip Generation Manual 10"' Edition, Volume 2: Data 297-298. Washington DC: institute of Transportation Engineers. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. "230 Residential Condominium[Townhouse." In Trip Generation Maoual9111 Edition, Volume 2: Data 395-396. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academics. 2010- "Urban Street Facilities." In Highway Capacity Manual 2010, 3:16-1-16-47. Washington, DC-- Transportation C:Transportation Research Board. United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2009. "4C. Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies." In Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 4C.03 439-441. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration. A=Com 27 November 2020 Appendix A Traffic Count Data Raw Vehicle Turning Movement Traffic Count Worksheets File Name. C.Wsersljefferson.younglDoc uments\Kupuna_MohouKKupun a_Mohouli AM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10/21/2020 Start Time: 6:00:00 AM Site Cade:00000000 Comment 1:Default Comments Comment 2-Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3:Select FilelPreference in the Main Scree Comment 4-Then Click the Comments Tab KU FroPm North L L MF omm EastT FST rom South PUNA PL A From WeOHOULI st Start Time Right Thru Left Peds R- ht Toru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds ❑6:00 AM 6 0 0 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 06:15 AM 2 0 3 6 3 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 1 0 06:30 AM 1 0 3 0 3 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 1 0 06:45 AM 0 0 2 0 6 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 6 8 3 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 1 0 07 15 AM 1 0 9 0 t0 38 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 133 3 0 07:30 AM 2 0 5 0 3 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 2 0 0745 AM 3 0 7 0 9 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 0 0 08:00 AM 1 0 5 0 9 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 2 0 0515 AM 1 0 6 0 6 s3 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 83 1 0 AM Peak Hour 6 0 27 0 25 236 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 489 6 0 7:00.8:04 AM Vehicle Count File Name. C.Wsersljefferson.yotAnglDoc uments\Kupuna_MohouKKupun a_Mohouli AM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10121/2020 Start Time:5:00:00 AM Site Cade:00000000 Comment 1:Default Comments Comment 2-Change These in The Preferences Window Comment I Select FilelPreference in the Main Scree Comment 4-Then Click the Comments Tab Ftrom No hL L MF From EasT From South n From WestT Start Time t Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Right I Tim I Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds ❑6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0645 AM 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 07 15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 4 0 0745 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 1 0 0 AM Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7:00.8:00 AM Bicycle Count File Name. C.Wsersljefferson.yotAnglDoc uments\Kupuna_MohouKKupun a_Mohouli AM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10121/2020 Start Time:5:00:00 AM Site Cade:00000000 Comment 1:Default Comments Comment 2-Change These in The Preferences Window Comment I Select FilelPreference in the Main Scree Comment 4-Then Click the Comments Tab OHOULI FroPm No hL L MF omm EastT From South KPUNA PL A From West Start Time t Right I Thru Left I Peds I R ht Toru I Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds 66:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 o- ❑ 06:15 AM 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 06:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0645 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 07:00 AM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0745 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 AM peak Hour 3 0 ❑ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7:00.8:00 AM Pedestrtan Count File Name. C.Wsersljefferson.yflunglDoc uments\Kupuna_MohouKKupun a_Mohouli PM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10/20/2020 Start Time: 3:15:00 PM Site Cade:00000000 Comment 1:Default Comments Comment 2-Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3:Select FilelPreference in the Main Scree Comment 4- The n Click the Comments Tab LFroPm No hL L �F omm EasT From Soutth A From WestT Start Time Rg ht Thru Left Peds R- ht I Toru Left Peds I Right I Thru I Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds 03:15 PM 3 0 4 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 84 0 0 03:30 PM 3 0 8 0 4 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 3 0 03:45 PM 3 0 8 0 9 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 1 0 04 00 PM 1 0 12 0 7 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 3 0 D4-15 PM 0 0 5 0 8 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 04:30 PM 1 0 9 0 11 120 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 69 D 0 D4 45 PM 1 0 7 0 2 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 05:00 Ph1 1 0 6 0 6 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 D 0 05:15 PM 1 0 3 0 3 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 3 0 33 0 28 454 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 312 3 0 Vehicle Count File Name. C.Wsersljefferson.yotAnglDoc uments\Kupuna_MohouKKupun a_Mohouli PM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10/20/2020 Start Time: 3:15:00 PM Site Cade:00000000 Comment 1:Default Comments Comment 2-Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3:Select FilelPreference in the Main Scree Comment 4-Then Click the Comments Tab OHOULI ST FroPm No hL L �F omm EastT From South",PUNA PIL A From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds I Right I Toru Left FPeds Ri ht Thru I Left Peds I Right Thru I Left Peds 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D4-15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 x4:45 PM 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 65:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Bicycle Count File Name. C.Wsersljefferson.yotAnglDoc uments\Kupuna_MohouKKupun a_Mohouli PM Peak.ppd Start Date: 10/20/2020 Start Time: 3:15:00 PM Site Cade:00000000 Comment 1:Default Comments Comment 2-Change These in The Preferences Window Comment 3:Select FilelPreference in the Main Scree Comment 4-Then Click the Comments Tab KUST PUNA North � Iv1QHm Eat ",,PUNAmSo th Al From W t From North From Eos! From South From lM1est Start Time Right Thru Left Peds I Right I T-uu t Left FTedIRight j Thru I Left Peds I Right J. Thru Left Peds 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D4-15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 04:30 PM 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 2 0 0 94:45 PM 2 0 0 ❑ 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65:00 PNt 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 D 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Pedestrian Count Traffic Count Data from TIAR for Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project - September 2011 KUKUAU ST KUKUAU 5T to makka to niauka ,n 0 t 5 to o p t 5 0 500 "` 295 MOHOULI ST 1 f 45 MOHOULI ST r 1 `- f 20 10 -1 ti - MOHOULI ST 50 S i r 230o to Kaumana 435 0 LO 85 y m Ln ") 0 1 cq N 'n to 0 t 5 to 0 0 t 20 a � to 5 0 0 t 60 170 to o' "` 310 490 cv r 580 -' 1 4 r 145 i r 25 4� 1 L� r 130 -A 1 " r 20 120 1 " T r 10 J ti t r KOMOHANA ST 160 1 ti 1 rr 35 1 T r 610 - cn o a 760 0 u, 0 fa Pvriahawai 280 - o 0 0 350 - p ,� 405 1 m� r 15 �` 175 10 1 w MOHOULI ST KUKUAU ST MOHOULI ST KUKUAU ST to makai to makai to makai to makai AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR EXISTING 2009 TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2 State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Traffic Count Station ❑ata 1012612020 15 Minute Report State of Ha"i,DepartmeT7t of Transportation,Highways Division f 5 Minute Volume Report Site loh:[71194000144 T n: - DIR 1:•N+ WR2: MP Final MOT:14500 Func•. .CEMl-�1R$AN 4ZOLt I'CTQk Court T,,-_ .A Cwt1b`F P_ 0... R UNW T14010 told- t7RT1:-74-GEC-16 RM COMMUMIL PEMOD[OSM-0 004 OIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMM13TEl4 PERIOD(I 5A I*o% Olk 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :� 014AI PEAK TWO O!RECTI.7NA-;-A< AV. 1AKHRr,mE 0715 AM to O915 PFA PM-PEAK Hk tIML 415PMtoSF5PM AM-FEW"HR V"XU ME NIA 916 PM-PEAK HR 11Z:w ME 910 536 1,346 AM K FAL­TUPo%+ ,. PM-K EACTORL`) 849 AM-DI%7 27.27 7713 +i'a PM-Dt%1 6018 39.62 TOO PREGTIONAE?EAr 01REC7104A1 PCAK AM•PEAK HR TIME 9715 AM W 0-915 AM 07.00 AM tc D3CO AM PM•PEAK HR TIME 430 PM To 530 PM 415 PM Fo 5'15 NA AM-VAK HR VOWME 3.14 929 PM-PEAK HR VOLU ME s12 535 AM PERI0117 f00,0012:11M OIR1 DTR 2 TOTAL PM PEPoOo(18$0.24-jan DIN t CHU TOTAL WQ CN RUTiONAI PERK TWO DfRECiIpNAI PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME 07:15 AAA tv 0815 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 415PM1o5:T5PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 354 440 1.27U PM-PEAK HR vOLW4E 810 Al:? 1,346 AM-X M(.IOW:%) 80+ PM-K FACIak%) 849 AM-Df%6 27.87 72.13 100 PM-IX%1 ED18 3982 1pD NON COTAMLrm PERoo0 wm_1540) DIRT DIR2 TOTAL 640k IMP.24-HR PE70005 DIRT OIR1 70TH TWO DtREI7K7NAI PCAX AM C,-HR PERIOD IMOO-1200 nw 5.641 5.921 PEAK HR TIME 1:45 PM to 745 PM AM+2-HR PERIOD 10000-+2170? 2.3n7 4235 6568 P EAK HR VOLUME 483 563 1•D46 PM 6•H R PERIOD 11200.180CI 3.A42 2975 6117 DIRECTIONAL PEAK FM 12-H PIPE NOD(12.0o 2400 41986 4.29- 2265 PEAK HR IIME 202 PM 1G 300 PM 1 15 PM To 2:15 r,M 24-HR PERIOD 02Z-24.061 1319 @534 1S.S$3 PEAKtiRVOLl1ME 596 574 C% 4617 53.83 100 11104E-AM DISH DIRT TOM TIME.AM OIRI IMR2 It= TyAE-PM DIRT OIR2 WTAL TIME.-PM DIRT DIR2 TOTAL 1200-QIS 15 10 25 06^O-0615 6Z 4A 146 1fp4-T2.T5 139 106 745 6600-r;n:15 T55 TOS 260 T215•12:?D 5 b 15 DGJ5-9690 42 T37 179 12151230 197 117 221 9&15.175:30 T31 105 237 1731•1215 Is R 14 %30 0645 7t 167 238 12'30+•I2[5 113 124 237 0530.D6A5 119 115 225 T0A$-07:00 5 5 11 0b45-07`00 75 T95 270 12.45-01.00 96 130 226 2545-77:00 IN 77 124 01-90•01'15 1e 3 15 373)0•G715 EI 199 266 01'00.OT-15 107 118 225 07.D0.0715 M 79 171 0115-0+30 7 S 12 07115-0730 95 229 325 OT I S-0130 93 137 230 0715-0730 97 SO 172 0+:32-01A5 5 _ L 0730-07:45 a3 256 349 0+.30-0+4° 96 135 237 0130-0745 75 73 149 01'45•02:1]0 - A 10 NAS•030(} 8t 243 324 04'45.02.00 110 165 275 07:45•C8.00 61 77 138 0@00-02=15 4 A 8 )990-4)91TS $4 TSB 772 GQ:CA-82.1; 126 T37 263 (A00-0&15 &4 70 154 0215-02.30 i _ 10 )S:TS-U&30 71 T76 254 02+5-0230 113 123 a3s Q$115-6430 91 74 165 D29D•(045 7 5 12 0890.9845 81 Ms 249 0230.02AF 134 138 272 114.33.0@.45 5R 61 120 0245-17690 1 9 70 0845-0400 90 187 277 112 45-0300 133 101 234 0&45-09.0 65 U 715 %:00-x:15 3 0 3 09%-4415 61 124 21 or 63:00-73:15 142 120 274 [7100-cg 15 GA 52 1% 03:15•033D 7 A it 09.85-0430 M 133 214 03:15•03130 754 129 274 0915.09 m 53 47 100 03.30-03:45 4 9 13 0930-0445 $2 +27 209 0330-03:45 T61 94 245 0930-09.45 27 34 6T 0345.0A:00 11 Yo 21 09As-1000 98 149 247 03.45•N $61 124 285 NA5•TRW 38 34 72 04:03.04:15 5 19 74 1D.00-1015 IUD T43 243 N00.04'15 169 199 278 1QD0.10.15 39 'S 74 W5-04'3C' 4 w 18 1045-ID30 s7 T34 231 Om+S-x1:30 177 147 $24 1615-+030 33 34 64 OAM 04+45 13 25 38 1D30-IOJ5 9T T39 236 D43D•04.45 216 119 335 1Q30.1RA5 36 28 64 0415.05:00 18 s'3 41 1 w•11:00 84 147 231 04:45•C6:OG 2T9 ME 367 1Q45.111D0 33 2.7 60 0&00-06Is 20 x 40 11470-II TS 123 T2s 251 05:00-05+5 T98 1"-+7 320 1+00-II 15 4 IS 47 05;15 95:30 28 67 11 T5.1130 94 138 732 06.15-?590 179 127 306 1T,15.1130 42 15 57 0530 05:45 26 33 30 113G,11.45 '29 IT3 242 C5.30,05.45 T31 R7 228 11.30.1745 19 22 40 (56.45-0600 3$ 513 122 1145-1200 94 132 226 MAS-0&00 162 121 283 I1AS-12% 16 7 23 hwypdc07-80WOrdslf'7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:31986,14 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report rx.,nvx�3.SaCT-}7 State of Hal aii,Oepartment of Transpnnation,Highways DwineA 15 Minute Volume Report Sife R1:A71194pppid4 T-I-, MR 1:•W MR L• V. Final MOT:14500 FunP•. .C4u UR$AN<OII r(;TOk Came Trp[•::A,S 0... R-UNW T13 0 t-.ki- DATE-- AM ATE:AM COMMUTER PMOO(4)$M-1690) RIR 1 DIR 2 TOTaI NA WMWMR PERIOD[15,00-19[00] DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :� 014AI PEAK TWO D!RELTIONAL PEAK AV. IAKHRnmE O7:FS AM Io 0e'15 PFA PM-PCAC HR TIME 430 PM"5:30 PVA AM-FLAK HR V"XU ME Z�o 965 1Z' PM-PEAK HR VOW ME 777 527 1.296 AM K FALTOPo%1 8.00 PM-K FACTOR`761 806 AM-DI%1 6.49 10.52 1130 PM-M) 5986 46.14 'TOO, PREGTIONAL PEAT 01REC7101441 PCAK AM•PEAC HR TIME 91'00 AM m OR00 AM 137.t5 AM In 061 SAM PM•PEAK HR TIME 0-30 PM to 5'30 PM App PM to 1Am PM AM-PEAK NR VOWME 343 965 PM-PEAK Hk VC1 a MF 777 514 AM PERIO6 IDa01)72:11W DIR1 DIR 2 TOW NA PERIOD Clt!uZ"W MR 1 tMR2 TOTAL iWO CX F4:;TiONAI FLAK fV::]I Re[.ilCNpl P645 AM PEAK HRTIME 07:15 AAA to 0815 AM PM PEAK wR SME d:30 PM w5-30 PM AM-fipAK HR VOLUME m 0-61 1,295 PM-PEAK HR V,JUME 777 77 1.798 AM-1f AACIOR?%) 6.06 Pm-K FAC7=•RIRI) 600 AM-Df%6 25.48 7452 100 PM-1)(%, 59.86 40.14 100 NON COTAIA=PERIOD[69190.1540] DIRT DID TOTAL 6401,IMP.24-HR PMUOW MR RIR7 TOM TWO EkRLITIONAI PCAX AM 6•HR PERIOD 000-$2'0rD 2.053 3.609 5.662 PEAL HR TIME 200 PM 10 3:00 PM AM 12-HR PMOD 10000-12.601 2.324A= 4529 1 EAK HR VOLUME 517 513 1,130 PM 6•H R PERIOD 112CO.18M 3,471 3,681 6,552 MRE4.T*NAL PEAK PM 12-H RPE NOD[12.0426:0=7 5.164 4AU ASi7 P LAK.HR TIME 700 PM 1a 3.00 PM 0715 AM Io 1015 AM 24-HR PERIOD 02,07-24.061 7,497 8,608 16.107 PEAKHRVOLUME 517 576 D% 4654 53A6 100 TIED-AM WRI DIRT TOTAL 111mr.AM DIR11 DIR2 Tom TME•PM 00441 RIR2 TOTAE TIME.-Pyr 0111 DID 2 TRIAL 7200-5}15 12 9 21 06^0-0615 44 T07 151 1T2.T5 117 418 235 05,00-PA:15 171 162 273 T215•12:30 15 12 27 005•9690 47 116 163 1215•12:30 T34 118 252 9&15.05'30 Too lag 236 1230•1215 11 tp 21 9630.0645 75 T55 236 12'30.12,03 T07 109 216 0530.DSAS 132 93 225 TSA5-01:00 10 R 18 9EA5-07`00 7T 168 239 12.45-01-00 3e 128 2�., 05,45-77:00 123 3c 219 01-90.01.15 7 6 T3 0700.0715 Et 592 273 N00.OT-15 575 T24 249 07.DO.0715 719 R1 799 0115-0130 7 3 70 07115-0730 70 244 314 OT Is-M411) 119 147 266 0715-0790 T05 65 173 01:30-01A5 8 5 13 0730-07:45 97 ?FA 357 0130-01 45 116 T38 254 0730-07'49 SO S2 732 01'45 102:130 4 L 12 07AS•031]0 55 243 338 0$AS-02.00 98 150 248 07:45.O�.W 09 72 161 02700-0k15 5 _ 9 0890-#T5 6A 218 266 Qs)o-5.15 T12 T13 24 0$tw-0&19 92 65 148 0215-07.30 4 _ 7 **-U@3O 72 T79 251 02'15-0230 114 T56 272 0&15-)430 76 54 130 0290•C2A5 3 5 8 0890.08,05 78 178 256 0230•@!45 144 115 259 115.30.043.45 53 58 111 0245-0690 7 7 14 08,65-0900 62 123 265 5:45-0.7'00 W. 1'27 274 0845-01.h00 SR 46 IN 03:00-�.'t5 9 4 13 09,00-9445 6$ 142 207 CO:OO-03:55 152 140 m 7 M-FA'15 76 45 121 03115•0330 5 A 9 09,15-0930 82 126 208 0115•0336 T 71 117 2138 0915.09 m 54 43 9r 0330-03:45 9 12 0930-0945 93 T39 232 0330-03:45 771 131 302 0930-09.45 41 $T 42 0315.01:00 7 to 17 09AS-11100 % 766 252 03.45•CO'A] 154 116 270 09AS•10:130 32 59 Bt Ngm•06:1' 6 4 20 10.00-1015 101 T45 246 N00•D4'15 T79 135 314 10Dp•10.15 3E 46 m OA15-04'30 9 10 17 IM5-1830 91 T17 211 N!I$-04:30 169 131 305 1615-1430 $1 41 96 04;30.06,45 12 27 39 1030-IU5 68 T38 226 0430.04.45 176 147 323 1Q3Q•10.44 38 23 61 0415•0660 12 3 45 lUA5•1100 Iii TO7 218 04:45•C6:00 196 Tal 317 1Q45.11100 38 24 6•e 0&06-06'15 9 313 11x70-II TS 119 727 236 05:00-M$ T911 TIT 309 1100-1115 38 25 63 05;15 9530 29 6P. 11'15.1130 11E Tt3 235 05.15-0590 2137 142 m. 1T,15.11:30 52 17 69 0538 135%5 32 m 36 1190.11.45 123 110 233 C5.30.05.45 143 108 251 11.30•17'15 31 15 46 (6.65-0600 42 62 124 IIA5-12.[0 103 130 233 MAS-4&00 138 727 2!Z 17:45-12% 15 12 27 hwypdc07-80WOrds1f7fr101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:31986,15 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report n.,nvx�2.52545*-}7 State of 4."i,Department of Transpnnation,Highways Division f 5 Minute Volume Report SI4l ta:[71194000144 I n: - DIR 1:•N1 WR2: MP Final MOT:16TM FunP•. .OLvd:�]R$AN4ZOLtrTQk Court T,p. A Cwnfer`F e: 0... Re UNW 7Y40 told- PATE:31 3111-17 RM COMMUMIL PMOD(4)SM-089W DIR 1 01R 2 TOTAL PM CDMWMR PEAE*P(I 5A 19[0% DIP 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :-014AI PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK A4. ".AKHRr,mE %o0r AM IPc5a0 AM PM-PCAIC HR TIME 515 PM M&TS PM AM-FEAK HR V"XUME 341 394 PM-PEAK HR VOLA ME 413 588 1,1131 AM K FALTOk%1 7 79 PM-K FACTOR`76) 872 AM-Ot%f 741? 1913 PM-Dt%1 60.83 x9.17 TM ELREGTIONAL PEAT 01RE01101NAE PEAK AM•PEAK HR TIME 030D AM[004rA AM 67400 AM Ic 1,91W AM PM•PEAK HR TIME 5.15 PM 10615 PM 4A5 PM 19'5.45 PM AM-VAK NR VOWME 347 494 PM-PEAR HR VCLU ME 9T3 $,A AM PER1011 DIR, DIR 2 TOM PM Pudoo(1800.24:0645 DIN 1 E1R2 TOTAL Wp CN RUTTONAL PERK TWO DfREC71pNA1 PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME 138 15 AM tri C@.15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 515 PM W&15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 379 423 1,358 PM-PEAdc HR vOLWdE 413 913 1,$91 AM-%PAOTOR?%) 7$9 PM-K fAvak%) 872 AM•Df%y 25.28 ?A 12 IN PM-IX%1 6883 39.17 166 NON ComMLr=PERIo0 Iwm-7580] DIR T DIR 2 TOTAL 64NR,12498.24•HR PERIODS DIRT RIR2 70TH TWO DtR&7K7NA1 PCAX AM(,HR PERIOD f*X-12'M 1 SO 3.7459 5.530 PEAK HR 900 AfA TIME 0IG 11290 AM AM 12-HR PMOD=1)0-1 ZOO) 2,134 4030 6161 P EAK HR VOLUME 423 719 1.IA2 PM 6•H R PEMOD 11X0.18001 31618 3,360 61978 D InCT*NAL PEAK PM 12-H R PE ROD[T2.001-2257,451 $.us 5066 17,051 P LAK HR IIME DA$,PM 101 A5 PM %'Co Am IO 112,co ALF ?4-HR PERIOD 0297-24.0111 &1019 171% 17,215 PEAKfiRVOLUME 5595 719 IY% d656 53.12 100 TIME-AN OIR7 DIRT Tum 'TME-AM PIR" OIR2 TOTAL TWIPM 0741 n1R2 ifMAL TIME-I'm DIM DIR2 TOTAL 1200-121 32 22 54 136^0-0515 14 20 34 1100-T2.T5 12T 126 749 OEn00-rA:15 223 142 365 1215-t2:3D 32 14 d6 WS %130 23 256 69 121512:30 tis 195 2745 96:15.455'30 161 1L 284 12313•1215 2A FQ 4< 9630.0645 b 55 95 12'30.12:J5 f22 11d 236 45530•DSA5 175 106 183 T2A$-01:00 21 1T 32 ObA5-4)F00 33 AO 113 12.AS-01.00 129 125 254 0645'-7790 15$ 144 299 01--w ol.15 13 '-0 27 07CO•0745 38 95 134 Cl'00.OF-15 147 T36 263 07.DO.0715 149 117 HE 011$-0130 7 12 19 11715-0730 42 T57 199 0115-1130 13A f37 257 0715-0730 138 123 261 01:30-01,45 14 4 22 0730-07:45 70 202 272 91,30-0145 T25 171 24 07.30-0745 139 111 250 01'15•92:1]0 6 4 1d O7AS•11300 72 165 238 01'45•02.130 T06 162 268 07:15•C&DI) 123 28 21 T 02700-0k15 5 0 14 0890-08 T5 75 209 2& 72:00-112.11 121 156 2$4 0.600 0k15 104 so 194 0215-02.30 11 5 i6 OB:TS-0@30 83 253 336 0215-0230 TDO 151 251 0&15-0430 1116 v T$3 D29D•L2i45 7 4 II 0090.0845 93 266 355 M130.0215 132 t60 292 78313.45@.45 183 w iw OMS-Om 4 6 15 08,15-0400 Tao ?R6 366 545-f400 T27 T62 289 OM45-0900 U 64 146 63:00-x:15 _ A 5 119100-25445 1257 T94 301 [3:00-0+3:5$ T3T 123 254 04011-7AT5 64 57 $26 03:15•0330 3 5 8 9475-0430 12 189 292 0115•0330 135 164 299 0915.0930 9A 72 16$ 03.311-03:45 3 A 12 0430-0945 94 T63 202 N30-03:10$ 124 134 259 0330-09.45 13 64 T29 03151,CA G6 1 3 7 09A5.1 DQO 1.14 IF3 267 03.45,NM 135 125 250 OaA5•TRW 58 At 99 NDO.04:15 5 3 9 1D.00-1Ot5 Fs 178 264 Noo-W 1- 149 126 277 1QDo-10.15 A4 45 a- [x:15-M•36 6 11 1M5-1830 97 147 244 N!I$-134:30 458 122 280 1015-1430 56 40 % OAM 04,45 9 7 16 1D30-IR45 99 167 265 0430.04.45 205 132 337 1Q30.1 1A 45 54 w 0415•0:0313 7 13 20 10A5•11:CD 96 149 2A5 N:45•455:00 132 MA 336 1Q45.11'D0 A8 45 93 0500-0515 5 16 23 11x70-11 T5 114 162 27o- 05:00-M$ 213 139 352 1100-1115 2E 31 60 05;15 95:30 13 11 30 1115.1130 71 T3$ 202 06.15-1590 213 155 371 1T•15•T1:30 39 A2 75 0530 05:45 12 23 37 1190.11.45 93 141 234 C5.30.05.45 254 153 1007 11.30•11 A5 40 25 65 0545-0600 17 25 42 11„15-12.450 104 159 263 MAS-J&GO 323 135 354 11 A5-1290 21 28 55 hwypdc07-80WOrdslf'7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32874,31 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report n.,nvx�2.52545*-}7 State of 4."i,Department of Transpnnation,Highways Division f 5 Minute Volume Report SI4l ta:[71194000144 I n: - DIR 1:•N1 WR2: MP Final MOT:16TM FunP•. .OLvd:�]R$AN4ZOLtrTQk Court T,p. A Cwnfer`F e: 0... Re UNW 7Y40 told- PATE:31 3111-17 RM COMMUMIL PMOD(4)SM-089W DIR 1 01R 2 TOTAL PM CDMWMR PEAE*P(I 5A 19[0% DIP 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :-014AI PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK A4. ".AKHRr,mE %o0r AM IPc5a0 AM PM-PCAIC HR TIME 515 PM M&TS PM AM-FEAK HR V"XUME 341 394 PM-PEAK HR VOLA ME 413 588 1,1131 AM K FALTOk%1 7 79 PM-K FACTOR`76) 872 AM-Ot%f 741? 1913 PM-Dt%1 60.83 x9.17 TM ELREGTIONAL PEAT 01RE01101NAE PEAK AM•PEAK HR TIME 030D AM[004rA AM 67400 AM Ic 1,91W AM PM•PEAK HR TIME 5.15 PM 10615 PM 4A5 PM 19'5.45 PM AM-VAK NR VOWME 347 494 PM-PEAR HR VCLU ME 9T3 $,A AM PER1011 DIR, DIR 2 TOM PM Pudoo(1800.24:0645 DIN 1 E1R2 TOTAL Wp CN RUTTONAL PERK TWO DfREC71pNA1 PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME 138 15 AM tri C@.15 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 515 PM W&15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 379 423 1,358 PM-PEAdc HR vOLWdE 413 913 1,$91 AM-%PAOTOR?%) 7$9 PM-K fAvak%) 872 AM•Df%y 25.28 ?A 12 IN PM-IX%1 6883 39.17 166 NON ComMLr=PERIo0 Iwm-7580] DIR T DIR 2 TOTAL 64NR,12498.24•HR PERIODS DIRT RIR2 70TH TWO DtR&7K7NA1 PCAX AM(,HR PERIOD f*X-12'M 1 SO 3.7459 5.530 PEAK HR 900 AfA TIME 0IG 11290 AM AM 12-HR PMOD=1)0-1 ZOO) 2,134 4030 6161 P EAK HR VOLUME 423 719 1.IA2 PM 6•H R PEMOD 11X0.18001 31618 3,360 61978 D InCT*NAL PEAK PM 12-H R PE ROD[T2.001-2257,451 $.us 5066 17,051 P LAK HR IIME DA$,PM 101 A5 PM %'Co Am IO 112,co ALF ?4-HR PERIOD 0297-24.0111 &1019 171% 17,215 PEAKfiRVOLUME 5595 719 IY% d656 53.12 100 TIME-AN OIR7 DIRT Tum 'TME-AM PIR" OIR2 TOTAL TWIPM 0741 n1R2 ifMAL TIME-I'm DIM DIR2 TOTAL 1200-121 32 22 54 136^0-0515 14 20 34 1100-T2.T5 12T 126 749 OEn00-rA:15 223 142 365 1215-t2:3D 32 14 d6 WS %130 23 256 69 121512:30 tis 195 2745 96:15.455'30 161 1L 284 12313•1215 2A FQ 4< 9630.0645 b 55 95 12'30.12:J5 f22 11d 236 45530•DSA5 175 106 183 T2A$-01:00 21 1T 32 ObA5-4)F00 33 AO 113 12.AS-01.00 129 125 254 0645'-7790 15$ 144 299 01--w ol.15 13 '-0 27 07CO•0745 38 95 134 Cl'00.OF-15 147 T36 263 07.DO.0715 149 117 HE 011$-0130 7 12 19 11715-0730 42 T57 199 0115-1130 13A f37 257 0715-0730 138 123 261 01:30-01,45 14 4 22 0730-07:45 70 202 272 91,30-0145 T25 171 24 07.30-0745 139 111 250 01'15•92:1]0 6 4 1d O7AS•11300 72 165 238 01'45•02.130 T06 162 268 07:15•C&DI) 123 28 21 T 02700-0k15 5 0 14 0890-08 T5 75 209 2& 72:00-112.11 121 156 2$4 0.600 0k15 104 so 194 0215-02.30 11 5 i6 OB:TS-0@30 83 253 336 0215-0230 TDO 151 251 0&15-0430 1116 v T$3 D29D•L2i45 7 4 II 0090.0845 93 266 355 M130.0215 132 t60 292 78313.45@.45 183 w iw OMS-Om 4 6 15 08,15-0400 Tao ?R6 366 545-f400 T27 T62 289 OM45-0900 U 64 146 63:00-x:15 _ A 5 119100-25445 1257 T94 301 [3:00-0+3:5$ T3T 123 254 04011-7AT5 64 57 $26 03:15•0330 3 5 8 9475-0430 12 189 292 0115•0330 135 164 299 0915.0930 9A 72 16$ 03.311-03:45 3 A 12 0430-0945 94 T63 202 N30-03:10$ 124 134 259 0330-09.45 13 64 T29 03151,CA G6 1 3 7 09A5.1 DQO 1.14 IF3 267 03.45,NM 135 125 250 OaA5•TRW 58 At 99 NDO.04:15 5 3 9 1D.00-1Ot5 Fs 178 264 Noo-W 1- 149 126 277 1QDo-10.15 A4 45 a- [x:15-M•36 6 11 1M5-1830 97 147 244 N!I$-134:30 458 122 280 1015-1430 56 40 % OAM 04,45 9 7 16 1D30-IR45 99 167 265 0430.04.45 205 132 337 1Q30.1 1A 45 54 w 0415•0:0313 7 13 20 10A5•11:CD 96 149 2A5 N:45•455:00 132 MA 336 1Q45.11'D0 A8 45 93 0500-0515 5 16 23 11x70-11 T5 114 162 27o- 05:00-M$ 213 139 352 1100-1115 2E 31 60 05;15 95:30 13 11 30 1115.1130 71 T3$ 202 06.15-1590 213 155 371 1T•15•T1:30 39 A2 75 0530 05:45 12 23 37 1190.11.45 93 141 234 C5.30.05.45 254 153 1007 11.30•11 A5 40 25 65 0545-0600 17 25 42 11„15-12.450 104 159 263 MAS-J&GO 323 135 354 11 A5-1290 21 28 55 hwypdc07-80WOrdslf'7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32874,31 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report nvn0�a xll�-oCT-77 State of Hawaii,Department of Transpnnation,Highways Division f 5 Minute Volume Report STtlm:[71194000144 T n: - DIR7:•W WR2: MP fml AAUT:T6TM Func•. .CLvs�1R$AN 4ZOL[I'CTOk Count Typc .h CwIAQTT _ 0... Rd.t.Nm T940 told- RARE:GTAIEG-17 AM COMMUIiR PERIOD(0S00-080M DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL Pm WMIMUnk PEM*P(I 5A 19[0% DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :� 014AI PEAK TWO D,REL_70NAL PEAK A4. ".AKHRnME WO AM IP(500 AM PM-PCAC HR nME 515 PM M&I$PM AM-FLAK HR V"XU ME 1:67 1,047 PM-PEAK HR Vow ME 9452 520 1402 AM %fALTUPo%1 .. PM-K EACTOR761 MI? AM-0* el"m 7012 1: PM-Df) 6237 37.63 TW ELRErt10NAL PEAT D1REC71 4AL PEAK AM•PEAC HR TIME 03 OD AM m0900 AM MOO AM m"?'•AM PMf•EAKHRTWE 5'30 PM to&30 PM 3.00 PM 1.4'07 QM AM-PEAK ENR VOW ME 363 1.097 53? AM PERIdt(00,01).72:000 DIR 1 PIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOQ E12�06.24A64 DLR t MR.2 TOTAL Wp DRU:TIONAI:LAK Y:':�1 R([TIpryAL PEAL AM PEAK HRTIME CS 0)AM t.03.130 AM ':Y PEAK HR TIME 515 PM 6c is PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 353 430 1.4917 PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 942 IH2 1,$82 AM-%fACTOPj?%) 8.V5 PD1-KPAC1(m%) 507 AM•Df%y 5.24 7112 100 "'Y•R%) 62.37 37.63 100 NON comIkArm PERIOD[69196.1500] DIR T DIR 2 TOTAL 6•11R IMP.24-HR PERIODS GER 1 DIR2 TOTAL 1WO DtRE47IONAI.PCAX AM f HR PERIOD f(4_X-12'CW 2.028 3.948 5976 PEAK HR TIME 0900 AfA IG 71290 AM AM 12-HR PMOD=00-12.ED) 2317 4,221 038 P EAK HR VOLUME 412 752 1.l EA PM 6•H R PERIOD 412CD•l SCC1 3,10 3,168 $,678 D ln4:T*NAL PEAK PM 12-H R PE NOD[12.0C}M:cC7 5.741 4,V$ TOS77 P CAC HR TIME 045 PM 161 AS PM 0900 AM IP I12.0D AM 74-HR PERIOD 0200-24.001 8059 9056 17,115 PE4KfiRVOLUME 503 752 IY% A7 D9 52.91 100 nW-AM DIRI GIRT Tum TIFIE•AM OIRI PIR2 TOTAL TNEE-PM Owl DIR2 TfSPAL rim[-Pm DIRT DIR2 TOTAL 1200-1}16 $2 16 48 06^0-06 TS 22 20 42 12:00-T2.T5 130 133 243 0600-?5:19 237 138 36? T215•12:ro 513 19 c9 170:15-9690 m A4 76 1215•12:30 113 719 2L�R 96:15.05'30 2D0 127 321 1230.1215 26 12 38 0630.0645 AQ M IN 12'30.1245 12A 768 232 C530.O6A5 171 117 288 T?AS-01:00 1B w 33 OEA5-0F00 44 95 139 12.x5-01-00 TTO 125 235 0545'-07:00 170 146 316 01-90•Ot115 11 9 2D 0700.0715 St 1,33 754 01'OO.OT-15 151 127 278 07.DO.0715 173 78 25t 0115-0130 $ 16 42 07115-0730 54 T5O 204 OT 15-0130 715 131 246 0715-07.311 1$1 100 251 01:30-01,15 11 7 18 0730-07:45 77 216 295 01,30-0145 T27 148 275 0730-0745 105 112 217 01'15 1 m.l 0 7 6. 13 NAS-133CO 82 209 291 01 AS-62.00 9A 174 268 67:45•C8.00 103 87 190 0@00-0k15 11 5 16 0890-08 T5 9T 244 335 02:00-42.1; T17 T43 260 08[10 0&15 114 74 193 0215-02.30 1 4 5 08:75-0830 90 270 360 0215-02 30 �11 T56 240 v815-O43a Tab 79 781 D23D•C2:45 11 6 17 0890.9805 96 294 390 0230.02:45 1N 126 ?M 0830•0®.45 $1 73 154 0245-0690 6 5 11 08,45-0400 106 259 395 5:45-4200 123 149 272 0&48-03:00 6$ 62 T30 03:00-Sl' s Y i5 0400-0415 l02 174 276 63:00-73:15 142 132' 274 [�L00-0915 153 62 135 031.15•0330 7 2 10 0475-0430 116 T96 312 0115•0336 120 139 259 0915.0930 61 48 409L 0330-03:45 7 5 T 0940-0445 $4 201 285 0330-03:45 136 136 272 0930-09.,45 58 52 110 03451,CA G6 6 3 9 09A5.1000 130 181 291 03.45•040 136 126 2452 OaAS•1Dp0 62 49 $11 Nqm•0415 5 7 T2 1D.00-1015 1136 740 246 N OC•D4'15 T70 114 264 10D0.10.15 45 29 74 06:15-04.30 4 4 13 IN5-1830 1% 148 250 OmI$-x1:30 in 135 317 1015-1430 Al 36 77 OAM 04,45 5 7 43 1030-1045 96 161 247 0430.04.45 222 1215 348 1Q30.1D.45 50 36 86 0"5•MOD 7 lA 21 1GA5•11:OC l08 160 268 N:AS•06:00 163 121 294 1Q45.11:D0 32 45 TT 0&00-0515 6 TG 77 11x70-1115 116 150 466 06:00-k515 210 Tt$ 378 1100-1115 37 79 65 05;15 05:30 15 14 23 1115-1130 109 154 267 06.15-1590 180 142 322 1 T•15.1130 31 36 E1 0530 05:45 77 29 4E 1190.11.45 97 131 226 C5.30.05.45 234 135 369 15.30.11-45 35 36 7T (6.45-0600 17 40 SP 11 a5-12.[0 101 146 253 0645-J&GO 217 105 327 11 A5-1200 22 28 $0 hwypdc07-80WOrdslf'7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:32874,1 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report Run Oats xll�-oCT-}7 State of 4.waii,Oepartment of Transpnnation,Highways Division SS Minute Volume Report ST4l E7:[71194000144 T n: - DIR7:•NL IAR2:-MP G-PAADT.16500 Func•. .EWs ]R$AN4ZOO[I'CTQk Court T7Pc CwrdQTy -tyyl R .NW T9401 t-ki- PATE-231-NOVAB AM COMMUIiR PMOCP(0SM-0 0M DIRT DIR 2 TOTAL PIA WIAM13TER PEAE*P(I59 1T[00 DIR 1 W.2 TOTAL _. :-014AI PEAK TWO DI RECTIONAL PEAK A4' ".AKHREiMe 0100 AM Io 0$QO AM PM-PCAK HR TIME 415 PM 1C 5'T5w AM-FLAK HR V"XU ME 445 1.124 PM-PEAK HR Vow ME 4T6 $71 1;167 AM K FALTUPo%1 ... PM-K 64CTOR761 846 AM-00%1 2$36 7164 1[±• PM-DfA) 61.6 .3aA TOO ELREGTIONAL PEAT D1REC71O4AE PEAK AM•PEAK HR TIME 97:00 AM[o ORCA AM 9700 AM to D3P7 AM PM f•EAK HRTIME 430 PM M 5'30 PM 345 PM to 4:45 NM AM-PEAK NR VOW ME 445 1.124 -'V :EAKHRVCV.UME 632 514 AM PER10111(00,01)12:11M DIRT DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD 07800.24 84 OTR t 01R2 TOTAL Wp pRU:TTONAL:LAK Y:':�I R([ilpry,by PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME 0700 AM tv 0300 AM -Y PEAK HR TIME d15 PM w5:T5 PM AM-9pAK HR VOLUME 445 458 1,569 PM-PEAK HR vOEU+4E 9T6 932 1,467 AM-[fACTORj?%) 6.93 Pm-KPkvT %) 8s4 AM•Df%y 2&536 71.64 100 -'Y•R%1 61.6 38.4 lOQ NON comIkArm PERIoll) 9wm-TSg03 DIRT DIR2 TOTAL 6•11R IMP.24-HR PEIUOOS DIRT QIR2 Tom 1WO rtREITIONAI PEAK Port 6•HR PERIOD 000-12'M 3346 4.172 4516 PEAK HR TIME 130 PM 10 230 PM AM 12-HR PMO010000-*.W? 3.537 4597 7,234 P EAK HR VOLUME 620 654 1,274 PM 6•H R PERIOD 112CO.16001 4,155 3ADA 7,55.3 DIRECT*NAE PEAR PM 12-H RPE NOD5]33 4.610 10,#3 P LAK HR TIME 1:00 PM 4c 240 PM 130 PM ro 3.30 PM 24 HR PEEHOO 022-24.031 4_370 0201 17,577 PEAK11RVOLUME 622 654 IY% A762 52.36 100 TIME-AN 0*1 DIR2 Tm T1IAE•AM DIRI DIR2 lom TNEE-PM Owl But 'EOTAL TIME.-Pm ml 0182 TOTAL 12-00-1215 1$ 4 22 06^0-9615 48 TOB 156 12:00-T2.T5 433 120 253 11&00-?5:15 1$1 1)] 320 1245-[2:ro 9 11 T9 175:15.9690 51 T23 174 1215 1230 T31 135 256 9&15.05'30 T48 69 237 1230•1245 6 R 16 17630.0645 w T85 245 12'30.12:x5 13T 160 231 05'30.O6A5 107 92 199 14x5-07:00 11 $ T7 OEA5-4)r`00 99 201 306 12.AS-01.00 142 754 296 O5,45-07:00 TD4 66 190 01--w•01'15 - 1 7 0700.0715 107 236 343 Ov'00.OT-15 $33 157 295 07.DO.0715 119 79 $98 0115-0130 4 T 5 0715-0730 103 300 403 OT 15-M30 $61 132 293 0715-0790 $7 7t 158 01:30-01,45 5 4 9 0730-07:45 107 312 419 01,30-0145 140 154 314 0730-0745 96 61 $51 01'45.02:1]0 3 3 6 07A5.030(} 128 270 40A 01'AS-0240 T83 177 3411) 07:45.0$AO 76 66 540 0@00-0715 7 2 9 0800-O8 T5 106 221 327 Qs)o-02.15 T32 T% 296 0$0w-0&15 T116 76 162 0215-02.30 4 1- 9 OBITS-0630 67 T 73 26D 0215-02 30 T65 757 322 0&1.-0430 69 54 123 029D•CP-45 8 E 11 0890.01145 81 194 275 0230.02!45 455 122 277 1336•0®.45 49 43 2?2 OCAS-0690 6 0 12 08,65-0400 S$ 194 384 1,112 45-0300 l65 747 312 0846-0300 45 34 79 03-00-�.'t5 3 5 8 09%-DBT5 89 131 126 63:00-03:v5 150 725 23 [FOOD-09 T5 45 3R 83 03,15.0330 5 5 TO 0475.0430 93 154 252 03:15.0330 201 136 337 0915.0930 42 27 63 03.30-O3A5 n f7 23 Og3O-0945 T52 248 0330-03:45 vel 183 320 0936-09.45 35 37 72 0315.04:00 4 1T 09A5.1D00 104 1.47 291 03.45•N 193 254 347 O'xA5•1600 32 Al 73 F!d:DO•Ot:15 3 TD T3 1D.Q0-lat5 94 T39 23 N OC•64'15 201 Til 318 Ial))•10.15 29 3A 63 Om15-0136 15 E3 29 1M5-1830 116 T21 243 OmI$-x1:30 IA, 165 352 1015-1436 37 34 17 OA30•0445 14 M 38 763©-19J5 -a TA4 rA 0430.04.45 217 146 365 1Q30.10.A5 26 39 65 0"5.05;00 17 3d 51 3DA5•11:00 123 146 269 N:AS•06:00 253 140 333 1Q45.11:D0 32 20 52 41&00-0515 20 ,T ST 11x70-II TS 104 T19 223 05:00-M$ 259 ll$ 377 1100-1115 36 17 47 05;15-95:30 29 L 72 1115-1130 105 T25 231 06.15-2590 203 93 2% 1 T-15.7130 47 14 65 0536 05:45 40 105 1190.11.45 125 $07 232 C5.30.05.45 174 136 310 11.30.1115 2A 6 30 05A$-0'641 46 114 to Il AS-1200 116 134 252 MA5-1}8'66 1$-0 126 282 11A5-1240 12 9 21 hwypdc07-80WOrdslf'7 101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NTNUMBER,PB_SURVEY_DAY:37544-28 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report re.,nvx�2.540*-}7 State of 4."i,Oepartment of Transpnnation,Highways Division f 5 Minute Volume Report Site M:[71194000144 T n: - DIR 1:•N1 DIR2: MP Final MOT:185DG Func•. .Cyee-�1R$AN1;41[I'CTOk Court T,,-_ R CwnfQ`F e- 0... R .NW 7940 t-.ki- OATS-23NOVAB AM COMMUIiR PEfMpO(OSM-0 0d) DIR i DIR 2 TOTAL PM COMMITTER PEf9OP(I 5A 1*11% DIR 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :� 014AI PEAK TWO D!REC ONAL PEAK A4. "!AKHRRiME 071$AM IP 0515 AM PM-PEAL HR TIME 415 PM IS Pµ AM-FLAK HR V"XU ME A1' 1.162 1,5'; PM-PEAK HR VOLA ME 947 969 1,5]4 AM it FALTUPo%1 8 R_ PM-K EACIORL`) 85A AM-0* :(E.41 7359 tau PM-Df) 62.A7 37;3 T0) PREGTIONAL PEAT 01REC71 4A4 PCAK AM•PEAC HR TIME TROD AM to 0360 AM W.T5 AM It,0315 AM PM•PEAK HR TIME 4:30 PM to 5'30 PM 406 PM to 5A7C PM AM-TEAK NR VOWME 41 1162 PM-PEAK HR VaUME 41R $47 AM PERIPO f00,00.12:13M DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL PM PEPo9D(7800.24-jan 01111 pR2 TOTAL Wp IN RUTTONAL PLRK 75Y0 DfREC71pNA1 PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME 07:15 AM to 0815 AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 415 PM to 5:15 PM AM-PEAK HR VCLUMd 417 479 1,579 PM-PLAT[HR vOLWdE N1 919 1,616 AM-t FACTOR?%) 6S9 PM-K FACICk%) 854 AM•Df%y 2641 7159 1D0 PM-D(%) 62.17 3753 too NON ComLwm PERIOD[09190.1540] DIRT DIR2 TOTAL 64NR,IMP.24-HR PDOOOS DTR1 QIR2 TORR TWO rtRE47IONAI PEN[ AM 6•HR PERIOD 0.10-12'M 2e19 4.3m 4715 PEAK HR TIME 2,41 PM 10 3-00 PM AM 12-HR PMOD fOD00-12.[4) 2.121 4,731 7,d52 P EAK HR VOLUME 686 4M 1,325 PM 6•H R PER17D 412CO.18001 {118 3,369 7157 DRRE4.7*14AL PEAK PM 12-H RPROD[12.042m6C7 5.763 4.600 10,303 P LAK HR TIME 2101-PM 1030)Ph1 )900 AM 10 117.00 ALF 24-HR PERIOD 02:W-24.031 B.A24 9.33] 1175; PEAKfiRVOLUME 6% 5AI DIF 47A5 5255 1D0 TIED-AM 0IR1 DIRT TO'ML 111MIp.AM DIRT IMR4 TATµ TIME-PM Dom OIR2 TOTAL TIME'.-PM DIRT DIR2 TOTAL 12,00-1}15 12 1 13 06^)-9615 49 L6 137 12:00-72.75 136 122 258 65,00-7;5:15 150 IaA 298 T275.12:ro 13 12 25 DG'15-%'30 48 TA4 192 12:15.12:30 131 129 2f0 9&15.05'39 155 120 275 12M,12A5 10 _ 15 MOO 0645 73 19T 26A 1230.1245 88 TA8 236 C53131NA5 f48 91 242 TVA$-97:00 6 5 11 0645-OFA] 112 T95 3)7 12.45-J1-00 TO3 135 236 -545-77:00 111 82 193 01--w•01'15 15 5 11 07CO,0715 100 256 356 Oli7C•07-15 1W 125 232 07.D0.0715 51 71 152 0115-013) 9 2 11 0715-0730 714 299 413 01 15-013) 718 148 2b6 0715-0730 113 64 171 -01,15 5 4 9 0730-07:45 43 256 388 01,30-014.° 141 149 290 07.30-0745 76 55 T 33 01'15•92:1]0 A 2 6 WAS•41300 762 307 409 01'4S-0240 716 153 2173 07:15•C8.W 74 77 151 0200-02:15 7 4 T1 9800-0815 108 267 359 02:04-82.15 439 452 291 C3E10-0&16 74 66 740 0215-02.30 4 6 10 09:15-x830 117 2T2 323 0215-0230 T$5 152 41 6$115-0439 71 SE 127 D23D•C245 3 A 7 0890-M45 91 181 272 @230.02!45 202 175 TR 719.30•08.45 73 1f 11A OMS-0690 Tl 5 16 0845-41-00 11T 145 306 112 45-f4 00 190 160 350 Q84S-O9,.W 45 A4 92 03:))-x:15 6 11 6940-aR 15 % 146 232 63:09-03:75 T43 136 $29 [boa-0075 45 40 85 03,15•033D 3 5 8 65715-0930 198 159 267 0115•0330 180 115 325 0915.0936 A6 46 92 033)-O3A5 9 10 TR 0930-ORAS @9 772 261 0330-03:45 229 114 343 0330-051A5 34 3e 64 0315.CA GG 5 10 15 09A5.1 DI70 110 164 272 03.45•00'(10 211 131 345 RYAS•1000 39 45 84 04:00•0:15 9 E 20 1000-1015 106 T44 259 N OC•D4'15 185 165 359 10D0.10.75 25 41 66 04:15-04.36 13 13 26 1M5-1D30 96 130 228 N!I$-x1:39 T96 toe 344 1615-1436 25 3r 58 Cg30•[6,45 7 24 31 1D30-iGA5 118 750 269 D4:3D•OA•45 247 lit 372 1Q30.1D.15 30 3D 60 0AA5-MOD 1L 13 49 1D45•]100 105 145 250 04:45•0690 21T 161 412 1Q45.11 Do 30 14 44 0500-[615 26 30 56 11,70-11 T5 122 T24 346 [6:00-M$ 25T 137 396 110)-1115 27 19 Ab 05;15.95:30 29 49 78 1115-1130 734 110 242 06.15-1590 200 132 332 17.15.1130 59 14 64 0530 05%5 4A !19 113 1190.11.45 100 1T9 219 C5.30.05.45 186 122 308 11.30.11-45 27 1C 37 OS4S-0600 55 151 156 1145-1200 1„ 1w 236 06145-J&GO tot 1134 2M 11 AS-1240 21 11 32 hwypdc07-80WOrdslf'7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:37544,29 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report n.,avx�2.540*-}7 State of Hal aii,Department of Transponation,Highways Dwim-1 f 5 Minute Volume Report STtl DD:071194000144 Town: - DIRT:•N[ D1R2: MP FmPAADT:17200 F-ki .CL -I1R$AN1;[]III'CTOk C-u Trpr- A Cw[i1QType: 0..• R UN¢Tw told- PATIE-t45EF-T9 AM COMMUIER PMOD(OSM-09903 DIR i DIR 2 TOTAL PIA COMMUTER P[itlOP(150419[0% 13IR 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :-ONAI PEAK TWO O!RECTIONAL PEAK A4. "!Ae HR nmE. 77.00[PC&GD AM PM-PEAK HR TIME 04:1$[G 0$:T$P>,1 AM-FLAK HR VEKU ME dal 1.164 PM-PEAK HR VOW ME 438 629 1,567 AM K FALTUPo%1 PM-K EACTORCa) 89 AM-000 77.52 ?2m 1i+, PM-DfA) 5986 40.14 100 ELREGTIONAL PEAT D1REC7104A1 PEAK AM•PEAK HR TIME CCAS w 0715 AM 07 CO to 00 AM PM r•EAKHRTIME 0-0.15(o0515PM 0490!005DO PM AM-PEAK HR VOW ME 459 11rr1 -V FEAKHRVCRuME 938 60 AM PERIOD(0004).72:000 Out 1 DDR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD(1800.24904 01111 OIR2 TOTAL WO CX F4:;TiONAI FLAK Y:':�I R([IlpryAl PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME 07'i to C900 AM --6 PEAK HR TIME 04:15 to 06'15 PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 442 1.1FA 1.6c,� PM-PEAK HR VOLUME 430 699 1,561 AM-t MC70r0:A) 913 PM-1C 1A4:To1k%) 89 AM-Df%5 2752 7248 100 PM-IX%1 59.86 40.11 100 NON COMWIER PEROD 409100.15gm DIR 1 DDR 2 TOTAL 6498 IMP.24-HR PERIODS DDR 1 4187 TOM TWO rtg47IONAI P EN( AM CHR PERIOD rc&•70-12'Ct 737E 4,099 6,475 PEAK HR TIME 0'45 ko 545 PM AM 12-HR PERIOD 40000-12.004 2.6& 4325 7,209 P EAK HR VOLUME 536 598 1,404 PM 6•H R PERIOD 112.00.1 503 4.108 3167 7575 DIRE4.7*NAL PEAR PM 12-H RPE NOD(12.00-24Lz 5-797 4fi33 10,39] PEAK HR TIME 02:4510 x'45 PM 023,)m4330 P4 24-HR PERIOD 02:W-24.031 $441 9158 17~99 PEAKiiRVOLuME 876 632 EA0 67.96 52.D4 100 TIME-AN DIRI DIRT TOTAL TIM[-AM DIFM IMR2 TOTAL TNM-PM DIRT 0I112 TOTAL TIM&-Pyr ml 01112 Tum ?200-1215 11 7 SS 05.M-0615 50 119 169 1200-12.T5 125 $16 241 05'00-r>6:15 187 i27 3Ff1 1215.1230 0 7 S5 005•0630 57 170 227 12:15.12:30 $24 713 234 96.15.05'30 145 113 258 1730.1215 7 A T1 %30-0645 9t T89 2m 12'30.1245 132 1A1 213 C630•C6A5 137 95 233 *A5-0:00 7 3 Tp 0545-02`00 119 V8T 300 12.45-01-00 94 $54 248 0545-07:00 129 94 223 01--W 01'15 7 3. TO 07CO G7'T5 117 257 374 M00.OT-15 117 127 244 07.00.0715 101 71 T72 0115-0130 8 T 7 07115-0730 120 317 437 OT 15-M 410 1 O9 T45 754 0715-0730 104 5Z 160 01:30-01,45 s 2 11 0730-07:45 103 253 396 01,30-0145 T22 131 2$3 07.30-0745 93 S6 ?4g 01'45.92:1]0 3 2 5 IWA5.03CO 102 297 399 04'4S-02.00 443 171 374 07:15.O$.00 75 57 132 02700-0k15 5 $ 0$00-04 T5 1O) 210 310 QsA)-5.15 122 T31 253 0$0w-0&15 77 $3 T30 0215-02.30 4 .6 t0 **-4830 107 1% 402 0215-0230 153 153 31B mi,-O&30 56 61 127 0290•C245 5 7 13 0890.0645 91 155 246 0230•02:45 178 }56 336 119.30•C&AS 55 52 107 OMS-0690 4 6 +S 0845-0°00 88 162 250 5:45-f4400 19c 154 349 0&45-0300 w 42 105 03:OQ-x:15 8 5 13 09%-0445 95 144 24Q 63:00-03:05 T93 144 337 [BOO-ml1 3$ 30 E5 03115•0330 3 4 7 0955.0930 90 T49 239 0115.0330 170 177 347 09:15.09,m 42 31 T3 0330-03:45 9 10 N 0930-0945 92 T58 250 0330-63:45 147 424 57T 033D-05-AS 37 M TT 0315.01:00 5 12 17 O5AS-1007 107 157 244 03.45•CO'Af 213 140 359 0'x1.5•10-00 44 39 83 04:00.04:15 _ 11 20 10.00-10.15 92 127 219 N00 94 15 205 15E 362 1C,D0.10.15 10 27 62 0415-04.30 6 'm 16 1M5-1830 104 T30 234 04!1$-01:30 :zw 192 399 1615-1430 3$ 32 N OAM-06,45 18 27 45 1030-IRA5 S+ T44 239 0430.04.45 22" 134 355 1 O3O.10.45 33 30 68 0415•05:00 22 36 58 10A5•1100 12t 119 240 O4:4S•C6:00 27t T68 4�9 1045.11:D0 32 15 47 0500-0515 19 30 49 11x70-11 T5 104 116 220 05:00-0515 139 135 374 1100-1115 ii 19 40 05;15-95:30 95 45 w 1115-1130 113 $00 213 06.15-0590 19T 138 329 1 T•SS•11:30 37 10 47 0530 05:45 41 82 123 1190.11.45 109 96 265 C5.30.05.45 176 126 302 t i.30•1145 40 12 52 05A$-01w 51 105 156 11x15-120+0 109 1H 222 MAS-11%S1W 162 424 213$ 11:45-13100 15 $ 26 hwypdc07-80WOrds1f7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO:RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,P8_SURVEY_DAY:39867,19 112 1012612020 15 Minute Report 1x O.a xll�-oCT-}7 State of 4.waii,Department of Transpnnatm.,Highways Division f 5 Minute Volume Report Siaej[):271194600144 T n: - OIR14•MP DIR2:-MP Final MOT:17206 FuncnwlOyye-UR$AN4ZOLtrTQk Court Tryc A Cw4 TyM Tyyn R .Nw T940 told- DATE-2P5EP-T9 AM COMMUI[R PMOCP(OSM-089W DIR 1 EMR 2 TOTAL PM COMMUTER PlEtlOP(154,495[00 OIII 1 DIR2 TOTAL _. :-ONAI PEAK TWO D!REL7IQNAL PEAK AV. Ae HREiME 77.00 to 0890 AM PM-PCAIC HR TIME 04-.90 to E604 PM AM-FLAK HR V"XU ML 435 1.102 t,,,,: PM-PEAK HR VOW ME 1557 6111 111485 AM it FALTUPo%1 8.55 PM-K EACTOR761 4129 AM-Dt%7 2$3 71.7 190 PM-DPM 5$315 41.62 'TOO 01REGTIONAL PEAT 01RE01014A1 PERK AM•PEAC HR TIME 97:15 to CGl5 AM 9kCO to G&90AM PM PEAK HRTIME Ot.30 to 65'30 PM Q33Dm D&M PM AM-PEAK HR VOW ME 451 1.102 : FEAKHRVOtu MF 5$ 637 AM PERI011 00000.12:000 DIR 1 DIR 2 TOTAL PM PERIOD 0llt! 2Z ON 01111 OIR2 TOTAL iWp CX RU:TiONAI FLAK X::IIU[[rICNAI PEAK AM PEAK HRTIME O-K tt3 Q5W ANA . FEAK NR TIME 64-00 w DROD PM AM-PEAK HR VOLUME 435 1101, +,537 V 4AKHRV iUML 1057 61A 111485 AM-[PAC10W:+q 6.59 Y CEA010R19si 829 AM•Df%y 28.3 71.7 100 V`�%+ 5&38 4152 566 NON CorALwm PERoO M9m_15Am DIR I DIR 2 TOTAL 64M 12-HR 24HRPERIOW D1R 1 41R2 TOTAL TWO Ctg4MONAI P CAK ... '.-'A-12'000 2364 A156 0520 PEAK HR TIME 0'45 To 0345 PM 5f.-d-12lb1 2.682 41553 ?45 P EAK HR VOLUME 757 607 1,357 ?I�' DI,2.CO•18001 4A68 3133 7$01 DIRECTIONAL PEAK t' -aq0[12.00}24:n=7 5 8$7 4,631 +0.668 P LAK HR TIME 02:451v 0345 PM 093,)Iv 1030 N'4, ,4-,;,:I..IQi)it 2:00-24.031 6319 9.384 +7.901 PEAKHRVOLUME 757 643 D% 67.58 S2.42 100 MW-AM DIRT DIIN TOTAL '21M[-AAM OIR1 IMR2 10TAL TNt4-PM 0711 out TOTAL TIME-PM ml 01112 TOTAL. 1200-1}15 13 9 22 O6.M-9615 36 +17 155 12:00-T2.T5 138 124 762 66,0-06:15 130 112 242 T235.12:?D 8 10 18 DO'15•%'30 M. 157 216 12151230 15t 133 284 0&15-m 36 158 l28 2W 1736.1215 l0 5 15 9630-06'45 s T94 777 12'30.1265 95 123 218 0530.MA5 161 16d 265 T?AS-07:00 11 A l9 0645-0F00 84 210 294 12.x5-01-00 T% T33 239 0545-77:00 114 104 218 01-90.01'15 4 8 T7 674,0.6715 's 228 323 Ol'66.61-15 116 1241 235 67.00.0715 66 TF 165 0115-0130 10 5 15 0'7115-0730 102 306 498 Or 15-0130 T41 131 272 07 15-0730 91 76 167 0+:30-01,45 4 7 9730-07:45 107 816 423 0+.30-0145 135 153 288 0730-0745 92 75 167 Ol'45•02:1]0 5 A 9 IWAS-6300 13t 252 383 61'45.62.60 139 IA? 286 07:45•C8.00 90 T14 TA9 02700-0k15 5 2 7 0800-08 T5 ITT 205 319 0Q.00-02.7'. T70 To 316 0@00-0&16 66 52 120 0215-02.30 c 5 1T O6:75-0630 65 T78 263 03 t5-0230 T46 150 996 0&1.-66:39 73 5$ 131 0230•C2A5 5 4 9 0890.0845 3 132 225 @230.02:45 173 157 310 114.36.08.45 76 51 127 O AS-0690 6 T 13 0645-0900 107 T30 287 11-+:45-0300 165 +68 3314 0845-0300 95 47 142 6300-7:15 s T 7 09%-0445 100 TV 227 03:00-03:15 192 144 336 &BLm-69 T5 60 50 T1[! 03:15•0330 5 1 8 09i5-0930 61 T32 215 6115•0390 197 138 335 0915.0930 51 51 102 03.36-03:45 7 5 12 Og3O-0945 113 145 258 0330-03:x5 203 150 353 0930-09.45 50 52 112 0345.01:06 7 13 20 ows-ID00 176 166 271 63.45.64'00 212 168 300 D'xA5.1090 40 46 86 F!4D0•04:15 A 5 13 1D.6O-H[15 12E T45 2M N00.04'15 2l0 154 364 1CDO.10.15 16 55 103 Om15-04:36 9 72 21 1 MS-7830 116 T44 303 0a 15-04:30 1444 155 359 1615-1036 39 143 83 OA30.0445 2a Z 42 1030.1Ri5 92 126 218 6430.04:45 218 145 364 1Q36.1D.AB 60 46 106 04/5•O:Lw 29 3t 56 lUAS•11 OD 193 T5f 254 64:45•G5= 245 T53 3% 1Q45.11:00 3A 37 71 06.00-0515 2T 30 $+ T1a70-11 T5 12:1 149 272 05:00-k5 15 222 137 359 1+00-1115 33 22 55 05;15-05:30 27 A4 7T 11 15-1130 % 102 198 06.15-14590 197 129 326 1 T-15-11:30 55 21 76 6538 05:,45 43 E9 112 1190.11.45 117 124 241 05.30.05.45 141 127 262 15.30•1145 25 17 42 05A$-0600 49 E7 136 7145-1200 116 124 240 06AS-0600 162 127 289 IIAS-+2100 28 15 43 hwypdc07-80WOrdsff'7p=101:8:6024500641676::NO RP:PS-COU NT NUMBER,PB_SURVEY_DAY:39867,20 112 Appendix B Intersection Operations Analysis — Synchro Worksheets Adjusted Year 2020 Peak Hour Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 3.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1� 1� 4 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 34 55 3 5 34 Future Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,°I° Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 49 528 5 11 186 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minora Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 278 0 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stage 1 - - - - - - 629 629 - 254 254 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 273 300 - 675 631 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7A2 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.315 3.518 4.018 3.318 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 1035 - - 259 268 545 248 284 807 Stage 1 - - - - - - 470 475 - 750 697 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 666 - 444 474 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 1035 - - 236 255 545 192 270 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 236 255 - 192 270 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 452 457 - 722 689 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 690 659 - 353 456 - Approach EB WB NB SH HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.4 12.3 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn'I Capacity(vehlh) 347 1285 - - 1035 533 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.329 0.038 - - 0,011 0.077 HCM Control Delay{s} 20.4 7.9 - - 8.5 - 12.3 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 3.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1� 1� 4 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 34 55 3 5 34 Future Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,°I° Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 49 528 5 11 186 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minora Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 278 0 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stage 1 - - - - - - 629 629 - 254 254 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 273 300 - 675 631 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7A2 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.315 3.518 4.018 3.318 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 1035 - - 259 268 545 248 284 807 Stage 1 - - - - - - 470 475 - 750 697 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 733 666 - 444 474 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 - - 1035 - - 236 255 545 192 270 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 236 255 - 192 270 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 452 457 - 722 689 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 690 659 - 353 456 - Approach EB WB NB SH HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.4 12.3 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn'I Capacity(vehlh) 347 1285 - - 1035 533 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.329 0.038 - - 0,011 0.077 HCM Control Delay{s} 20.4 7.9 - - 8.5 - 12.3 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r 'fir t r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 16 366 191 115 139 184 144 610 405 145 170 8 Future Volume(vehlh) 16 366 191 115 139 180 144 610 405 145 170 8 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1870 1670 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 17 398 208 125 151 196 157 663 440 158 185 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 2b2 205 266 586 148 634 225 690 34 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 739 959 1781 1870 1585 1781 1769 86 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 17 398 208 125 0 347 157 663 440 158 0 194 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1698 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 Q Servetg_sj, s 0.8 17.4 9.7 4.5 0.0 16.7 4.7 29.7 20.8 4.8 0.0 6.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.8 17.4 9.7 4.5 0.0 16.7 4.7 29.7 20.8 4.8 0.0 6.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c),�Fehlh 109 530 449 252 0 472 586 748 634 225 0 723 V/C Ratio{X} 0.16 0.75 0.46 0.50 0.00 0.74 0.27 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 252 0 472 586 748 634 225 0 723 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{I} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.1 29.4 26.6 23.4 0.0 29.5 14.6 25.1 22A 21.0 0.0 18.7 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 3.0 9.4 3.4 6.8 0.0 9.8 1.1 14.6 6.2 16.8 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °Toile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0.4 8.6 3.9 2.2 0.0 7.6 1 A 14.8 8.1 2.8 0.0 2.7 Unsig. Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 43.1 38.8 30.0 30.2 0.0 39.3 15.7 39.7 28.6 37.8 0.0 19.6 LnGrp LOS D D C C A D B D C D A B Approach Vol,veh,'h 623 472 1260 352 Approach delay,sfveh 36.0 36.9 32.8 27.8 Approach LOS D D C C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 40.5 9.5 30.0 10.9 39.6 10.0 29.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 6.4 35.1 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.8 31.7 6.5 19.4 6.7 8.4 2.8 18.7 Green Ext Time(p--:c),s 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0A 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.6 HCM 6th LOS C Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations T 1� 4 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 22 317 5 54 442 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minora Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 447 0 0 322 0 0 958 919 320 936 919 445 Stage 1 - - - - - - 364 364 - 553 553 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 594 555 - 383 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1113 - - 1238 - - 237 271 721 245 271 613 Stage 1 - - - - - - 655 624 - 517 514 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 491 513 - 640 623 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1113 - - 1238 - - 191 254 721 217 254 613 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 191 254 - 217 254 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 642 612 - 507 491 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 405 490 - 593 611 - Approach EB WB N9 SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0.9 14.8 15.3 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLnl Capacity(vehlh) 411 1113 - - 1238 - 433 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.103 0.02 - - 0.044 0.193 HCM Control Delay{s} 14.8 8.3 - - 8 - - 15.3 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.7 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 1.1 Movement ESL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ] + t r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 4 315 485 40 48 4 Future Vol,vehlh 4 315 485 40 48 4 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,°I° - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 4 342 527 43 52 4 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 570 0 - 0 877 527 Stage 1 - - - - 527 - Stage 2 - - - - 350 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - - - 319 551 Stage 1 - - - - 592 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 - - - 318 551 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 318 - Stage 1 - - - - 590 - Stage 2 - - - - 713 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 18 HCM LDS C Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 1002 - 318 551 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.004 - - 0.164 0.008 HCM Control Delay{s} 8.6 - - - 18.5 11.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - C B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.6 0 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 --* --1' -,it, i- 4-- I* -V Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r T t r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Future Volume(vehlh) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 11 189 195 326 362 120 196 304 190 141 533 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 382 313 124 325 148 634 445 109 11 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 1344 446 1781 1870 1585 1781 1818 44 Grp Volume{v), vehlh 11 189 195 326 0 482 196 304 190 141 0 546 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1790 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s O.5 7.3 9.0 5.0 0.0 24.0 6.0 10.5 7.4 4.2 0.0 22.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s O.5 7.3 9.0 5.0 O.0 24.0 6.0 10.5 7.4 4.2 0.0 22.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),�Fehlh 109 530 449 382 0 497 325 748 634 445 0 726 V/C Ratio(X) 0.10 0.36 0.43 0.85 0.00 0.97 0.60 0.41 0.30 0.32 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 382 0 497 325 748 634 445 0 726 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 39.9 25.7 26A 31.0 0.0 32.1 18.4 19.3 18.4 15.3 0.0 23.7 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 1.9 1.9 3.0 21.0 O.0 33.4 8.1 1.6 1.2 1.9 0.0 7.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °Toile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0.3 3.3 3.6 6.5 0.0 14.2 2.9 4.5 2.7 1.8 O.0 10.4 Unsig. Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 41.8 27.6 29.4 51.9 O.0 65.5 26.5 21.0 19.5 17.2 0.0 30.7 LnGrp LOS D C C D A E C C B B A C Approach Vol,veh,'h 395 806 690 687 Approach delay,sfveh 28.9 60.1 22.2 28.0 Approach LOS C E C C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 40.5 9.5 30.0 10.9 39.6 10,0 29.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 6.4 35.1 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.2 12.5 7.0 11.0 8.0 24.8 2.5 26.0 Green Ext Time(p--:c),s 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.6 HCM 6th LOS D Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour Background without Project HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 3.3 Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi t* 1� 4 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,vehlh 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,°I° Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt FIow 49 534 5 11 187 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minot Conflicting Flow All 279 0 0 539 0 0 909 936 537 936 892 233 Stage 1 - - - - - - 635 635 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 274 301 - 681 637 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1284 - - 1029 - - 256 265 544 245 281 806 Stage 1 - - - - - - 467 472 - 749 696 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 732 665 - 440 471 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1284 - - 1029 - - 233 252 544 189 267 806 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 233 252 - 189 267 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 449 454 - 721 688 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 689 658 - 350 453 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.6 12.4 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn'I Capacity(vehlh) 343 1284 - - 1029 529 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.333 0.038 - - 0,011 0.078 HCM Control Delay{s} 20.6 7.9 - - 8.5 - 12.4 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 0.3 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 1.1 Movement BSL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ] + t r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 14 535 257 80 43 10 Future Vol,vehlh 14 535 257 80 43 10 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,°I° - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 15 582 279 87 47 11 MajorlMinor Majorl Malor2 Minor2 Conflicting Flaw All 366 0 - 0 891 279 Stage 1 - - - - 279 - Stage 2 - - - - 612 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - - 313 760 Stage 1 - - - - 768 - Stage 2 - - - - 541 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - - - 309 760 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 309 - Stage 1 - - - - 758 - Stage 2 - - - - 541 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 17 HCM LDS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 1193 - 309 760 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.013 - - - 0.151 0.014 HCM Control Delay{s} 8.1 - - - 18.7 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A - - C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.5 0 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Movement EOL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r T + r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 17 367 194 115 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18 Future Volume(vehlh) 17 367 194 115 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 18 399 211 125 160 196 187 663 440 158 185 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 251 212 260 b81 148 634 225 b21 68 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 765 937 1781 1870 1585 1781 1659 179 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 18 399 211 125 0 356 187 663 440 158 0 205 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1702 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1838 Q Servetg_sj, s 0.9 17.5 9.9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 4.9 0.0 7.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 0.9 17.5 9.9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 4.9 0.0 7.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c),�Fehlh 109 530 449 251 0 473 581 748 634 225 0 694 V/C Ratio{X} 0.17 0.75 0.47 0.50 0.00 0.75 0.32 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 251 0 473 581 748 634 225 0 694 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{I} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.1 29A 26.7 23.4 0.0 29.7 14.9 25.1 22A 21.2 0.0 19.6 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 3.2 9.5 3.5 6.9 0.0 10.6 1.5 14.6 6.2 16.8 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °Toile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0.5 8.7 3.9 2.2 0.0 7.9 2.3 14.8 8.1 2.9 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 43.3 38.9 30.2 30.3 0.0 40.3 16.4 39.7 28.6 38.0 0.0 20.7 LnGrp LOS D D C C A D B D C D A C Approach Vol,veh,'h 628 481 1290 363 Approach delay,sfveh 36.1 37.7 32.5 28.2 Approach LOS D D C C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 40.5 9.5 30.0 12.0 38.5 10.0 29.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 7.5 34.0 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.9 31.7 6.5 19.5 7.7 9.0 2.9 19.2 Green Ext Time(p--:c),s 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0A 1.0 Intersecfion Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.7 HCM 6th LOS C 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SSR Lane Configurations I 1� 1� 4 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,°I° Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 22 321 5 54 448 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minora Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 453 0 0 326 0 0 968 929 324 946 929 451 Stage 1 - - - - - - 368 368 - 559 559 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 600 561 - 387 370 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.315 3.518 4.018 3.318 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1108 - - 1234 - - 233 268 717 241 268 608 Stage 1 - - - - - - 652 621 - 513 511 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 488 510 - 637 620 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-I Maneuver 1108 - - 1234 - - 187 251 717 214 251 608 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 187 251 - 214 251 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 639 609 - 503 489 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 402 488 - 590 608 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0.9 14.9 15.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity(vehlh) 406 1108 - - 1234 429 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.104 0.02 - - 0,044 0.195 HCM Control Delay{s} 14.9 8.3 - - 8.1 - 15.4 HCM Lane LOS B A - - A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations fij + t r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 7 315 485 59 94 9 Future Vol,vehlh 7 315 485 59 94 9 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,°I° - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 8 342 527 64 102 10 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flaw All 591 0 - 0 885 527 Stage 1 - - - - 527 - Stage 2 - - - - 358 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - - 315 551 Stage 1 - - - 592 - Stage 2 - - - - 707 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - - - 312 551 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 312 - Stage 1 - - - - 587 - Stage 2 - - - 707 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 21.2 HCM LDS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 985 - 312 551 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.008 - - - 0.327 0.018 HCM Control Delay{s} 8.7 - - - 22.1 11.7 HCM Lane LOS A - - C B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1.4 0.1 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 --* --1' -,it, i- 4-- -NI* -V Movement EBL. EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r T t r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15 Future Volume(vehlh) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 22 198 225 326 367 120 208 304 190 141 533 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 428 418 131 302 663 582 420 584 18 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 1350 441 1781 1870 1585 1781 1806 54 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 22 198 225 326 0 487 208 304 190 141 0 549 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1791 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1861 Q Servetg_sj, s 1.1 7.6 10.7 7.9 0.0 23.2 6.8 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.1 7.6 10.7 7.9 0.0 23.2 6.$ 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 Lane Grp Cap(c),�Fehlh 109 530 449 428 0 555 302 663 562 420 0 602 V/C Ratio(X) 0.20 0.37 0.50 0.76 0.00 0.88 0.69 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 428 0 555 302 663 562 420 0 602 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{I} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.2 25.8 26.9 25.7 0.0 29.4 20.9 22A 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.2 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4.1 2.0 4.0 12.1 0.0 17.6 12.4 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 20.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °Toile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0.6 3.5 4.3 3.7 0.0 11.9 3.5 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 13.8 Unsig. Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.3 27.9 30.9 37.9 0.0 47.0 33.0 24.7 22.9 20A 0.0 49.8 LnGrp LOS D C C D A D C C C C A D Approach Vol,veh,'h 445 813 702 690 Approach delay,sfveh 30.2 43.3 26.7 43.7 Approach LOS C D C D Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 12.7 8.8 27.5 3.1 25.2 Green Ext Time(p--:c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.8 HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour with Project HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1� '� 1� *T* *t+ Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,vehlh 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,°I° Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 536 5 11 195 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minora Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 287 0 0 541 0 0 919 946 539 946 902 241 Stage 1 - - - - - - 637 637 - 263 263 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 282 309 - 683 639 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7A2 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1275 - - 1028 - - 252 262 542 241 277 798 Stage 1 - - - - - - 465 471 - 742 691 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 725 660 - 439 470 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1275 - - 1028 - - 229 249 542 186 263 798 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 229 249 - 186 263 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 447 453 - 714 683 - Stage 2 - - - - - 682 653 - 349 452 - Approach EB WB NB SH HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.9 12.5 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn'I Capacity(vehlh) 339 1275 - - 1028 522 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.337 0.038 - - 0,011 0.079 HCM Control Delay{s} 20.9 7.9 - - 8.5 - - 12.5 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 _ - 0 - - 0.3 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 11: Mohouli Street & RI/RQ Driveway 1111312020 Intersection Int delay,slveh 0.1 Movement ESL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t t r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 4 551 267 8 0 7 Future Vol,vehlh 0 551 267 8 0 7 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt FIow 0 599 290 9 0 8 Major/Minor Major9 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 290 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - _ 0 749 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 749 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Maier Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) - - 749 HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - 0.01 HCM Control Delay{s} - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - _ 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations + + r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 16 535 265 80 74 10 Future Vol,vehlh 16 535 265 80 74 10 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,°I° - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 17 582 288 87 80 11 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 375 0 - 0 904 288 Stage 1 - - - - 288 - Stage 2 - - - - 616 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1183 - - - 307 751 Stage 1 - - - - 761 - Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1183 - - - 303 751 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 303 - Stage 1 - - - - 750 - Stage 2 - - - - 539 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 19.8 HCM LDS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 1183 - - 303 751 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.015 - 0.265 0.014 HCM Control Delay{s} 8.1 - - - 21.1 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A - C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 ---* --1' -,it, i- 4-- I* -V Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WEST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r T t r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 354 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 4.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 513 21 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 1363 430 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume{v), vehlh 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),�Fehlh 109 530 449 422 4 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 534 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{I} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22A 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4.6 2.1 4.5 12.9 0.0 20.1 17.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °Toile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0Z 3.6 4.6 3.8 0.0 42.6 4.2 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 14.5 Unsig. Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 LnGrp LOS D C C D A D D C C C A D Approach Vol,veh,'h 468 826 723 699 Approach delay,sfveh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS C D C D Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p--:c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.6 HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations T 1� *T+ 4 Traffic Vol,vehlh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 150 - - 150 - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 22 325 5 54 450 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 455 0 0 330 0 0 974 935 328 952 935 453 Stage 1 - - - - - - 372 372 - 561 561 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 602 563 - 391 374 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7A2 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6A2 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.315 3.518 4.018 3.318 PotCap-1 Maneuver 1106 - - 1229 _ - 231 265 713 239 265 607 Stage 1 - - - - - - 648 619 - 512 510 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 486 509 - 633 618 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1106 - - 1229 - - 185 248 713 212 248 607 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 185 248 - 212 248 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 635 607 - 502 488 - Stage 2 - - - - - 400 487 - 586 606 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0.9 15 15.5 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) 402 1106 - - 1229 426 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.105 0.02 - - 0.044 0.195 HCM Control Delay{s} 15 8.3 - - 8.1 - 15.5 HCM Lane LOS C A - - A C HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0.1 - - 0.7 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 11: Mohouli Street & RI/RQ Driveway 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 0 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t f r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 4 326 462 40 4 2 Future Vol,vehlh 0 326 462 40 0 2 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - 150 - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt FIow 0 354 502 43 0 2 Major/Minor Major9 Malor2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 - 502 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - - - - 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - - - - 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - - 0 569 Stage 1 0 - - - 0 - Stage 2 0 - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - - 569 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 11.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) - - - 569 HCM Lane VIC Ratio - - - 0.004 HCM Control Delay{s} - - - 11.4 HCM Lane LOS - - - B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) - - - 0 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 3.2 Movement BSL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ] + f r if Traffic Vol,vehlh 11 315 525 59 116 11 Future Vol,vehlh 11 315 525 59 116 11 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 - - 200 300 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 - Grade,°I° - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 342 571 64 126 12 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 635 0 - 0 937 571 Stage 1 - - - - 571 - Stage 2 - - - - 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 948 - - - 294 520 Stage 1 - - - - 565 - Stage 2 - - - - 702 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 948 - - - 290 520 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 290 - Stage 1 - - - - 558 - Stage 2 - - - - 702 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 25.3 HCM LDS D Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 948 - 290 520 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.013 - - 0.435 0.023 HCM Control Delay{s} 8.8 - - - 26.6 12.1 HCM Lane LOS A - D B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 2.1 0.1 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 ---* --1' -,it, i- 4-- I* -V Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WEST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r T t r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 354 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlh/In 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 4.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 513 21 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 1363 430 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume{v), vehlh 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),�Fehlh 109 530 449 422 4 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 534 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter{I} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22A 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4.6 2.1 4.5 12.9 0.0 20.1 17.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °Toile BackOfQ(50%),vehlln 0Z 3.6 4.6 3.8 0.0 42.6 4.2 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 14.5 Unsig. Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 LnGrp LOS D C C D A D D C C C A D Approach Vol,veh,'h 468 826 723 699 Approach delay,sfveh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS C D C D Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p--:c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 38.6 HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Appendix C Intersection Leve! of Service Definitions Highway Capacity Manual 2010 Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in terms of a weighted average control delay for the entire intersection. Control delay quantifies the increase in travel time that a vehicle experiences due to the traffic signal control as well as provides a surrogate measure for driver discomfort and fuel consumption. Signalized intersection LOS is stated in terms of average control delay per vehicle (in seconds)during a specified time period (e.g., weekday PM peak hour). Control delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing and coordination (i.e.. progression of movements through the intersection and along the corridor). signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity and resulting queues. Table 1 summarizes the LOS criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010(Transportation Research Board, 2010). Table t.Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay Level of Service (secondlsNehicie) General Description A 510 Free Flow B >10-20 Stable Flow(slight delays) C alp-35 Stable flow(acceptable delays) D X35-55 Approaching unstable flow{tolerable def ay,occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E n55-80 Unstable flow(intolerable de'ay) F' a80 Forced flow(congested and queues fail to clear) Source.Highway Capacity Manua12010,Transportation Research Board.2010. 1. If the volume-to-capacity(vlc)ratio for a lane group exceeds 1.0 LOS F is assigned to the individual lane group.LOS for overall approach or intersection is determined solely by the control delay. Unsignalized intersection LOS criteria can be further reduced into three intersection types:all-way stop, two-way stop, and roundabout control. All-way stop and roundabout control intersection LOS is expressed in terms of?he weighted average control delay of the overall intersection or by approach. Two-way stop- controlled intersection LOS is defined in terms of the average control delay for each minor-street movement ,or shared movement) as well as major-street left-turns. This approach is because major-street through vehicles are assumed to experience zero delay, a weighted average of all movements results in very low overall average delay, and this calculated low delay could mask deficiencies of minor movements.Table 2 shows LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections. Table 2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay(seconds/vehicle) A 0-10 B X10-15 C X15-25 D X25-35 E X35-50 F' >50 Source-Highway Capacrry Manua12010,Transportation Research Board,2010. 1_ It the volume-to-capacity(vic)ratio exceeds 1-0.LOS F is assigned an individual lane group for all unsignalized intersections.or minor street approach at two-way stop-controlled intersections.Overall intersection LOS is determined solely by conlrol delay. Hale Ula U Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 3 Archaeological Field Inspection Report [This page intentionally left blanl►[ _ SMANtr p.CASE DAVID}.IGE r i ...� •'� RfMin 1,X unIlA.msAnninl 04�f117 CAti'FRhQR QF IiaWh!! f,�f��t 0 S 9 �1,7�� 11 iwCA+NM Iln w.lte N.0 il'k'F u.M.0 4rt xfl AuH1 •� zy.z ROSEW K.SLLSLMA -WS I 104 Me 'NN �Y t-1-kul o sLJOWI . 4. {/ IA 11'1 Y Lel 11 MI WPf•lk UITh f ., .ANI M N41[ �� .�.w..._..••'r IX 1nTWli nyll Y'f by NFl"W'AI]IIN fu ReF i:'IF 14 NVIE V AK V __.._. f 14WAS6Sif IN 1#4 M•Y WK RF%R ra T.NAW N 1i An Ni 1 CINYF11 V A IN IN AND I nAWfAI LWXs STATE OF HAWAII PW Wl1 RF$nlRCF5 F111+H J16--NI N'N11r@�&FRII�1 I ijNU.,1RY Vl7,WUJ ji.JFT �dr,{}µp.rrTO DEPARTMENT OF LANG}AND NATURAL RESOURCES Nnik1+LAI`AI`�1UN)C[017-N Tlx[ltAilV'R iK CAMI S1 ATF IIN TORICPRESERVATION DIVISION >T•1 :MNKS KAKI.:I11111_WA 111111_[71NG 601 KAMOKILA BLVD,SIT 555 January 15,2021 Ks+PO1_EI,HAWAII 90707 1N REPLY REFER TO: Tracie-Lee Calnero Project No. 2020PROOOIO County of Hawaii—Planning Department Doc.No.2101 SN I I 141 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo.HI 96720 tracie-Iee.camerow hawaiicounty.gov Dear Ms. Camera: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application for IIale Ola 0 Mohouli COR-20-135782-Hawai`i Island Community i]evelopment Corp. Walakea Ahupua`a,South Hilo District,Island of Flawai`i TMK:(3)2-4-001:168 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SIiPD's) review of the subject County of Hawaii State Land Use Boundary Amendment application received by our office on January 6, 2021. The submittal included a site map, the State I-and Use(SLU)Boundary Amendment Application, a Department of Planning letter, and photos of the proposed project area.The project area consists of the entire 9.09-acre parcel. The applicant, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HiCDC). is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary amendment to change the SLU designation from Agriculture (A-la) to Urban (RM-4). HICDC intends to develop the site as a"Pocket Ncighborhood" development with small-scale residential units surrounding common areas. Our records indicate that this project area has been subject to an archaeological inventory survey(AIS).No historic properties were identified during the AIS and the negative findings were presented in an archaeological assessment (AA) report (Haun 2008). S11PD accepted the Haun (7008) AA report in a letter dated May 11, 2016 (Log No, 2008.5033. Doc, No. 0811 MD24). The proposed project area has been subject to previous grubbing and grading permit reviews, resulting in determinations of no historic properties affected (e.g., Log No. 2014.05277, Doc, No. 1412SN02: Log No.2015.03578, Doc.No. 1511 SN04),The SHPD has no new information or records of any kno kvn significant historic properties within or near the proposed project area. Based on the information provided above- the SHPD has no objections to the proposed amendment to the SLU boundary application (COR-20-136792). However, SHPD requests the opportunity to review future permit applications involving ground disturbing activities. Please conCact Scan Nalcimaile at(808)933-7651 or at scan. .naleimaile rr.hawaii, ov for any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha. Alec 2-164/141v- Alan S.Downer, PhD Administrator,State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer CC' County of Hawaii Planning Department.yianningki.hawaiicounty.gov Keith Kato-HICDC, keith.hicdc(dxmail.corn As Archaeology� History•Ethnography•Architectural History August 6,2020 ASM Project No. 35220.00 Keith Kato Executive Director Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street#204 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 email: keith.hicdc@gmail.com ria entail Subject: Field Inspection of the Hale Ola of Mohouli project area, TMK:(3)2-4-001:168,Waiakea Ahupua`a, South Hilo Island ofHawai`i. Dear Keith: As requested, ASM Affiliates (ASM) conducted an archaeological field inspection of the proposed Hale Ola o Mohouli project area, which comprises a 9.091-acre parcel (TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168) located in Waiakca Ahupua'a.South Hilo,Island of Ha,,vai`i(Figures 1,2,and 3). The purpose of the field inspection was to determine if historic properties exist within the subject parcel and to make recommendations regarding any additional FIRS Chapter fiE requirements with respect to developing the parcel.This report summarizes the geological context of the subject parcel, the relevant findings from prior archaeological studies,details the findings from the current field inspection,and provides recommendations based on our findings. Geological Context The subject parcel is located entirely on the 1880-1881 Hilo Lava Flow. Between May, 1580 and August, 1881,a series of eruptions on Mauna Loa sent lava flows down through the subject parcel,nearly reaching Hilo Bay(Figures 4 and 5). Kauahikaua et al.(2019)describe the route taken by the lava.On May 1, 1880, an eruption began in Moku`dweowea,the summit crater of Mauna Loa,and lasted a few days.The following November,the eruption resumed,this time from vents along the Northeast Rift Zone. Lava streamed down the mountain toward Hilo Town,the main flow following what was then Kukuau Gulch. The flow reached the subject parcel in late June, 1881,completely covering it,and continued inakai. The eruption continued until August 11, stopping just short of a mile from Hilo Bay. The young lava and little soil development (Figure 6) on the subject parcel and surrounding area was unsuitable for farming, or even grazing, and remained undeveloped (Figure 7) until the construction of the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood project beginning in 2012. Due to this lava flow,there is a low likelihood of archaeological sites or deposits predating 1881 on the subject parcel,and the land use history of the parcel suggests that few, if any,historic properties post-dating the eruption will be encountered. Prior Archaeological Studies Two prior archaeological studies have been conducted in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel, neither of which identified any historic properties.An archaeological inventory survey(Robins et al. 1996) was conducted for the Mohouli Street Extension project, which included the road right of way adjacent to the subject parcel. No historic properties of any kind were identified during the that study. A second archaeological inventory survey(Haan 2008)was conducted for the Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood project area, which is located between the subject parcel and Komohana Street (now TM Ks (3) 2-4- 011 177, 178, 184. 185, 186, and 187). The survey covered 15.9 acres and did not identify any historic properties. 820 Mililani Street.Suite 700,Honolulu,Hawaii 96813 (808)439-8089 Fax;(808)439-8087 507A East LanikauIa Street,Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (8 08)969-6066 Fax:(808)443-0065 www.asmafflliates.com August 6,2020 I-icId Inspection for the IIale Ola o Mohouli Project Page 2 of 10 Field Inspection Methods and Results On July 29, 2020, Johnny Dudoit, B.A. and Olivia Crabtree, tinder the supervision of Benjamin Barna, Ph.D.(Principal Investigator)conducted a field inspection of the entire ground surface of the subject parcel. The ground surface was primarily pahoehoe bedrock covered with a very thin layer of decomposed leaf litter, which is consistent with the USDA's mapped soil data (Figure 6). Vegetation was relatively thick (Figures 8 thorough 13) and was dominated by guava (P.sidiwn sp.) saplings and scattered '6hi'a (Metrosideros polvmorpha), with an understory of ularhe (Dicranopteris linearis). Introduced species typical of disturbed roadsides are present along Mohottli Extension. Despite the vegetation, it was possible to inspect the ground surface for lava tube entrances (none were noted) and surface features. No historic properties of any kind were observed. Summary and Recommendations As a result of the current field inspection, no historic properties of any kind were identified on the subject parcel. Our recommended determination of effect for the proposed project is "no historic properties affected." Should you have any question or concerns,please dont hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Benjamin Barna, Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist References Cited Haun, A. E. 2008 Archaeological Assessment,Portion of TAN:(3)2-4-01:168,Land of Waiahea,South Hila District, IS1and ofHawai'i, Haun& Associates. Prepared for Brian Nishimura, Hilo. Kaualtikaua,J., B. Gaddis,K. u. Kanahele, K. Hon, and W. Valerie 2019 The Lava Flow that Came to Hilo—The 1580-8I Eruption gl'Mauna Loa Volcano, Island of Hawaii. United States Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2019-5129, Lawrence, W. R. 1881 Map showing end of lava flow near Hila, Hawaii, Aug, 24, 1881, Hawaii Government Survey Registered Map No. 919. Robins,J., W.Fortini,and R. Spear 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey ofthe Proposed Mohouli Connector Road,AhupPra'a of Kukuau 1 and 2. Ponahawai, and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Haw'ai'i. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. Report SCS-085-2. Prepared for Youngki Hahn, Ph.D. Sherrod, D..J. Sinton, S. Watkins, and K. Brunt 2007 Geologic Map of the State of'Hawai'i. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. Open-File Report 2007-1089. Electronic document, http;Ilptibs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1089,accessed Apr 27, 2018. Soil Survey- Staff 2020 Web Soil Survey. United StateDeparrnent afAgricirltrrre,Natural Resources Conservation Service. Electronic document, http:IlwebsoiIsurvey.nres.usda.gov, USAAF (United States Anny Air Forces) 1940 Hilo and Mauna Loa in Distance, Hawaii, T.H. National Archives and Records Administration Aerial Photograph 18-AA-37-026..Airscapes-Hawaiian Islands. Electronic document, https:llcatalog.archivcs.gov accessed May 18,2018. August 6,2024 Fie Id Inspection for the Hale Ola o MohouIi Project Page 3 of 10 N Area of detail P9}A1: [} 100 200 �If In _ •Rvi :mN� r� tAwal!Co'- earrpnNr ct ,S,bjccl rc:Cl -r .. M1 -�.�• .iic+lar .I � yi..,':��'• }1il•:HS• OmuF.n °-5lrearA R.E Mf:. � c• h� 10 MkWA110611 H71y 4- $1,Owpi,H5 il�el-•• - K:pa�,rA:'� � ..•Fr._v.n�r: Ley LI r, - - -•�'�•�� fmrsT ecwen '•i . Clrrn S[h p�T y�o' r• r _& ay. - r Y 3.•'y'J .t ,0 I I.vr HAWAII C01JNTY SJ ,f�ga ,5 J inrnrn'dalr , a W 1171 A K 5 ,t R.WAII IMIN 7r S Hilo hirlcrs Portion of USGS 7.5 Quadrangle I filo,EII 2U20 ' Figure 1. Subject parcel location. August 6,2020 Field Inspection for the I tale 01 a o M ohou I i Project Pagc 4 of 10 .......... '.4 Lis L---J fir! 501- F99 t� 7� 10 'D m FE Ip 2 21 Z, S5 gf in t C? A LL. August 6,2020 Field Inspection for the Hale Ola o MohouIi Project Page 5 of 10 ❑ Subject parcel r� - Av bw Ok P. ..�- -..����:-.-- �. .rte .�""�;�rti• y- }�.�:-�. ti � ' .'rte- •r \ `AL . V. • ^ • mow r .,ti '��. 4 16 r�� . y* L Z' ` • ` +` or I '�► • � � _ T r� arL I 3r Figure 3. Recent satellite imagery of the subject parcel. August 6,2020 Field Inspection for the Hale 01a o MobouIi Project Page 6 of 10 0 2f1 X00 1,000 Meters TA P -.. SH0W114C END Rf LAVA FL4��' F41 Z FE] i Suhjcet parcel i Figure 4. Portion of Registered Map 919 with the subject parcel indicated(Lawrence 1881). 0 50 140 200 Meters Kau Basalt 750-1,500 yr Kau Basalt 750-1,50.0 yr ro N Kau Basalt A.D. 1880-1881 N Subject arce] J p Kau Basalt 750-1,500 yr Figure 5. Geology in the vicinity of the subject parcel (Sherrod et A. 2007). Or 529X553 .�, �► 4� f 43 .,� J WO. ♦ � �' [�� � r 653 639 629 Panackya very cobbly hydrous loam.2 to 10 perccill slopes 653 Kcaukaha Eghly decomposed plant material,2 to 10 plexeml slopes IMI$U"ew SOL • ;1 »: xi JF 7;77 s.+i': _ M1 Fy�y...• al _.1 i,,. •'�-- -.msµ� �• � • i -� ��T a _ a �'.• �`�7�f;" 'J,,,''. :;�°'..�..: _..� gyp;' �•.- x. S r car ''• ,•� - r r •s; ,s y At .. _.: r.. o - • - -"I', err e f f 1 f�'{]� ~ ��. '� �� ti��,,tie'r'��T�r �fi� +�' •1.. -� or litr � y 7'+a f�' y ti: ���� ro ,� , �• � ,�!• 1�• •-k � Jam`-+�,� f f i ► � i moi:�' r P�',• __ a .. �F': ��� �` -'�,• ��%` rT,,:''�.. -�"N f'* :L. � •'Frig - � �t�h:.�. •r�!F � �� ` �-"� 'i ' .,_+moi� �.a{��" i e� •�'' _ � �Cf� ".\ iL�: � fes'•_ -�." -a.. tom-• (`. :fir_. k•." -;. ;,_-, ."'�=,.,.. _ `'.' � -_ =" _ r: _ �,-� ` _ •�:�,, '• ^% y ,� '. is 'r,.'r� � ��T' ''l � r � .s�r�� .; y• � stir lz NI-4i" po. PV ri �45Y,fi rA,` _ �j, [ w �y', �S' .�[� . •t ' q,. r -.'fA. r 'yrs 'r "�. �* ► r vt yrs. } f [This page intentionally left blanl►[ Hale Ula U Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Note: Appendices not included. Available upon request to H[CDC [This page intentionally left blanl►[ PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR MOHOULI STREET, TMK (3) 2-4-401 :168 HILo, HAWAII 96720 MNA PROJECT 2271_3 DECEMBER 21, 2016 Myounghes Noh & Associates Environmental Studies and Consulting Services 200 Kohola Street, Hilo, Hawaii, USA 96720 • 8(]8.935.8727 99-1046 Iwaena Street, Suite 210A, Aiea, Hawaii, IDSA 96701 - 8{)8.484.9214 This Phase I ESA report is prepared for: County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development 50 Wailuku Drive Hilo, Hawaii 96720 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR MOHOULI STREET, TMK (3) 2-4-001 : 168 HILO, HAWAII 96720 TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 9.091 acres MNA Job No. 2.271_3 December 21, 2016 I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. 1 have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312. -�-- ty�-_� I• (r fl I Jessica Walsh Environmental Professional Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C. Environmental Studies and Consulting Services 200 Kohola Street, Hilo, HI 96720 Tel(808) 935-8727 www.noh-associates.corn 2271_3 ii Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATUREPAGE ......................................................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................... ..Vii FINDINGS.....................................................................................................I........................................Vii RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ...........................................................................ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE .................--•-............................................................................................................... I 1.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................. l 1.2.1 Site History..............................................................................................................................1 1.2.2 Regulatory Records.................................................................................................................3 1.2.3 Site Reconnaissance.....................................................................----..............................--...-.3 1.2.4 Site Geology and Hydrogeology........................................................................................,....3 1.2.5 Data Evaluation and Reporting......................... ........ ...... ....... ....... .......................--...........4 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS..................................................................................................4 1.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS...........................................................................................4 1.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.......................................................................................4 1.6 USER RELIANCE...............................................I......................................................................... 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ...5 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................5 2.3 GEOLOGY.....................................................................................................................................5 2.4 HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY...................................................................................7 2.5 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.......................................................................8 2.6 STRUCTURES, ROADS,AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS......................................................8 2.7 PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY .............................................................................8 2.8 CURRENT AND PAST USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES.................................................8 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION................................................................................ 21 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS........... ....................21 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE..................................................................................................22 3.3 VALUATION REDUCTION ......................................................................................................22 3.4 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE PHASE I ESA.................................................................22 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW..........................................................................................................22 4.I STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL. RECORD SOURCES.........................................................22 4.1.1 Federal National Priorities List............................................................................................23 4.1.2 Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List...................................................................23 4.1.3 Delisted NPL Site List...........................................................................................................23 4.1.4 Federal CER CLIS List..........................................................................................................23 4.1.5 Federal CER CLIS NFRAP Site List......................................................................................23 4.1.6 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities List............................................................24 4.1.7 State Brownfield Sites......................................... .......... ............. .................. --........24 4.1.13 State Hazardous Waste Sites.................................................................................................24 4.1.9 State LandflllSolid Waste Disposal Sites.............................................................................24 4.1.10 State LUST List.....................................................................................................................24 4.1.11 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites..............................................--...............................................25 4.1.12 Federal RCRA Generators List.............................................................................................25 4.1.13 State Registered UST List........................... ..............--............ ...............-•--............ .........25 4.1.14 Federal 10 and EC-5 Registries..................................,.........................................................25 2271_3 Ili Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 4.1.15 State ICs and ECs Registries.................................................................................................25 4.1.16 Federal ERNS Lba.......................................................,.........................................................26 4.1.17 State Releases Li,st.................................................................................................................26 4.1.18 U.S. Brown_rfields....................................................................................................................26 4.2 ADDITIONAL RECORD SOURCES.........................................................................................26 4.2.1 Subject Property......................................................................................................... ...26 4.2.2 Surrounding Properties............................... ..................................-... --...........................26 4.3 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY..................................27 4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs..............................................................................................27 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Alaps...............................................................................................28 4.3.3 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map................................................................................................29 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE............................................................................................... 31 5.I METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONI]ITIONS.................................................................31 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING..................---....... ................----............................... ..................31 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS......... .........................................................................................3I 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS....................................................................................................31 5.5 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS...........................................32 5.6 ABOVE GROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS...........................................32 6.0 INTERVIEWS.................................................................................................................... 32 6.1 Gordan C. Heit, DLNR................................................................................................................32 7.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS ................................................................................... 32 8.0 KEY FINDINGS AND OPINION...................................................................................... 33 8.1 Subject Property...........................................................................................................................33 8.2 Surrounding Area.........................................................................................................................33 8.2.1 Non-REC................................. ............................... ......................................................-----33 9.0 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................... 34 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 35 TABLES Table 1. Hilo Aquifer Classification System..................... ............ 8 ........................................... Table 2. Users and Primary Uses of Subject Property..............................................................9 Table 3. Users and Primary Uses of Adjoining Properties..................................................... 10 Table 4- Aerial Photograph Details.........................................................................................27 FIGURES Figure1. Site Location Map....................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. TMK Map........................ .......................... 6 Figure3. Site Map.................................................................. ......... ....................................... 30 APPENDICES Appendix A Environmental Data Resources Report and Maps Appendix B Site Reconnaissance Photographs Appendix C Additional Supporting Materials 2271_3 iv Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.G. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001;168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii CONTRIBUTORS Project Manager Jessica Walsh Site Assessors Phillip Cabanila, Herbertson Santos Report Writer Jessica Walsh,Graham Knopp Drafter/Illustrator Herbertson Santos QA Review Myounghee Noh 2271_3 v Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.G. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AST Aboveground Storage Tank CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CESQG Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators COH County of Hawaii CORRACTS RCRA Facilities that are undergoing"corrective action" EC Engineering Control EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERNS Emergency Response Notification System ESA Environmental Site Assessment FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency HDOH Hawaii Department of Health HEER Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response HELCO Hawaii Electric and Light Company HFD County of Hawaii Fire Department IC Institutional Control LQG Large Quantity Generator LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank MNA Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C. NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned NLR No Longer Regulated Generators NPL National Priorities List OHCD Office of Housing and Community Development RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act REC Recognized Environmental Condition SH WB Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch SQG Small Quantity Generator TMK Tax Map Key TSD Treatment, Storage, and Disposal USGS United States Geological Survey UIC Underground Injection Control UST Underground Storage Tank VRP Voluntary Response Program 2271_3 A Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH oHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Myounghee Noh & Associates, L.L.C. (MNA), was retained in October 2016 to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) for the subject property located in Hilo, Island of Hawaii, and identified by four Tax Map Keys (TMK), Island 3, Zone 2, Section 4, Plat 001, and Parcel 15$. The subject property was owned by the State of Hawaii. This Phase I ESA was completed for the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development for the potential acquisition of the property through an Executive Order from the Governor for development as senior housing. The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental conditions (REC) at the subject property,with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. A Phase I ESA consists of four parts. Three of those parts are intended to collect information that will aid in the identification of REC at the subject property. The information generating parts of the Phase I ESA consists of a review of state, federal, and local environmental records; a site reconnaissance visit;and interviews with key site personnel and other individuals with knowledge regarding the subject property. The fourth part of a Phase I ESA is a report that documents the collection of information about the subject property and evaluation of that information towards making a determination of the presence of REC at the subject property. The subject property was located in Hilo, in eastern Hawaii,approximately 1%2 miles southwest of Hilo Bay and Waiakea Pond. The subject property was an unimproved vacant vegetated lot with no structures or roads present. FINDINGS No records of NFL sites, Federal RCRA CORRACTS and Non-CORRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted National Priority List sites, Federal CERCLIS sites, Federal CERCLIS NFRAP sites, landfill or solid waste disposal sites,State Leaking Underground Storage Tank List sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, Federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sties, Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, Federal ERNS list sites, Federal or State Brownfields sites were identified at the subject property or in the area surrounding the subject property. Information provided as part of the User Questionnaire completed by Alan Rudo,project manager with the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development, did not indicate any RECs. MVA conducted an interview with Gordon C. Heit, Land Agent for the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division, owner and manager of the subject property. This interview did not indicate any RECs. Based on a review of historic aerial photographs and topographic maps, no RECs were identified. NINA requested records for review regarding the subject property, adjoining properties, and surrounding area from the State of Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB) and the County of Hawaii Fire Department (HFD). SHWB and HFD responded that they had no records regarding the subject. MNA reviewed HDOH Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (HEER) Office publicly available files and sources online. No sites or incidents were listed for the subject or adjoining properties. 2271_3 vii Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Limitations/Data Gaps/Deviations MNA encountered limitations in this Phase I ESA. During the site reconnaissance, there was limited access to the subject property due to the dense and impenetrable vegetation. The vegetation made it difficult to thoroughly inspect the ground surface and much of the interior of the subject property. There were no indications of illegal dumping, and therefore this is considered a minor data gap, as it is not anticipated that illegal dumpsites are hidden by the vegetation. There were no deviations from the Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM International,2013). Non-REC Subject Property During the site reconnaissance, MNA observed no evidence of REC. Surrounding Area During the site reconnaissance, MNA observed one propane aboveground storage tank (AST) located on the adjoining property to the west, TMK (2) 2-4-073:408. The AST was in good condition, and there was no stressed vegetation. Therefore, the AST is not considered a REC. EDR identified two hazardous waste sites located 3/4 mile away from the subject property: 604 Wailoa Street, Located 1/4 mile and downgradient from the subject property was the LanakiIa Homes Phase 313-4 site. The site was identified as having heavy metal and lead contaminated soils present,and managed with controls. Due to the distance and proximity of this site from the subject property, it is not considered a REC. Nan-Geocoded Location on Kaumana Drive. The HELCG Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 20938 at Pole No. 7 was identified as having petroleum contamination in the soil. The contaminated soil was removed, and a No Further Action letter was issued on 05 June 2012. Due to the distance of this site from the subject property, this is not considered a REC. MNA reviewed the Final Environmental Assessment for Fire Administration Support Complex, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island cif Hawaii, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 & 178 (Previously Parcel 168 /portion]),dated June 2009,which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the adjoining property to the east(M&E Pacific,Inc.,2009). The proposed Fire Administration Support Complex would include administration, dispatch, and preparation/training buildings, warehouse, fire station, museum, open and covered training areas, site infrastructure, and paved access and parking areas. The use would include all operations and trainings. While the EA indicated no existing condition or impact from the construction or use of the facility related to hazardous materials or petroleum products that could impact the subject property, MNA notes that should the facility be constructed and used as outlined in the EA, mock fire training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. 2271_3 viii Myounghee Noh& Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS MNA performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13 of the subject property identified as TMK(3)2-4-001:158 in Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described III Section 7.0 of this report. This assessment has not revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions based on existing conditions at the time of this Phase I site assessment; however, should the Fire Administration Support Complex be constructed on the adjoining property to the east and used as outlined in the EA, mock fire training including staging tires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. 2271_3 ix Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted during October and November 2016 for the subject property identified by the Tax Map Key{TMK} of Island 3,Zone 2, Section 4, Plat 401, and Parcel 158 [TMK(3) 2-4-001:168] in Hilo, Island of Hawaii. The location of the subject property is identified in Figure I. This Phase I ESA was conducted by Myounghee Noll & Associates, L.L.C., herein referred to as MNA,forthe County of Hawaii(CO H)Office of Housing and Community Development(OHCD). At the time of this Phase I ESA, the subject property was owned and operated by the State of Hawaii. 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify any recognized environmental conditions (RECs) at the subject property, with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and petroleum products. This practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to CERCLA liability, "all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the site consistent with good commercial or customary practice." The term recognized environmental condition denotes the presence, or likely presence, of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property (ASTM International, 2013). This report is part of the Phase I ESA conducted for the subject property. The assessment was conducted in accordance with the practices described in Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM International, 2013). 1.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES A Phase I ESA has four components: records review, site reconnaissance, interview, and report. MNA conducted this ESA using information sources with the potential to identify past or current releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products into the subject property. Adjoining properties were also evaluated for their potential to impact the subject property. Per the ASTM International Phase I ESA Standard, adjoining properties include parcels touching the subject property as well as those properties across a roadway (ASTM International, 2413). 1.2.1 Site History Where available and as needed, MNA researched historical and current topographic maps, tax records, fire insurance maps, and aerial photographs to identify previous and current uses of the property, adjoining properties, and the surrounding area. 2271_3 1 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. /"�`�'-_ .�.,. .:y;. rte_ � ,• � . - ---mow•-- . � Hilo Bay 4-�• Hilo International ':, — - m Airport -"� r ; . -i�•.� _ �Vaiakea Pond S{r - �'� _' -•�-,i,Y .- . . �cr=y ,�_ ~•, , rLti 4, - - �� � � Y� .41 - r , r�r. J• .'i`��.:�i�•r. .i: ••• - . .rte -•' � - ..:' ,_ ''\ - ,� •r'+ `"�'� �'� �' A s. L _ *+ =• ���'i�ti; a i 71 5 :AA Subject Property - ° D.5 ;ay'•� 1'-❑ mile Fi-ure 1. Site Location Map Phase I ESA Mohouli Street, Hilo, Hawaii 2-4-001:168 r COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii 1.2.2 Regulatory Records MNA examined government records with respect to environmental conditions, citations, complaints,and permits at the subject property,at adjoining properties,and within the surrounding area. MNA utilized a records search provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), to review records from the following federal and state programs: ■ National Priorities List (NPL) ■ Delisted NPL • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities that are undergoing "corrective action" (CDRRACTS) • RCRA-Treatment, Storage, &Disposal (TSD) • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation & Liability Information System (CERCLIS) List ■ CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned(NFRAP) List • Federal and Hawaii State Brownfields ■ Hawaii Solid Waste& Landfill ■ Leaking Underground Storage Tanis (LUST) • RCRA-Violators/Enforcement • Underground Storage Tank(UST) • Emergency Response Notification System(ERNS) ■ RCRA—Generators, including those No Longer Regulated (NLR) • Hawaii Sites of Interest • Hawaii Releases • Federal and Hawaii State Land Use Controls ■ Hawaii Voluntary Cleanup Sites • Tribal Lands Additionally, MNA requested state environmental case files from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDGH) and County of Hawaii Fire Department(HFD). 1.2.3 Site Reconnaissance MNA peiforn-ied a site reconnaissance to obtain information indicating the likelihood of contamination, to interview available site personnel, and to conduct a brief assessment of the adjoining properties. During the site reconnaissance, MNA looped for a variety of indicators of environmental hazards including, but not limited to, stained surface soil, dead or stressed vegetation, hazardous substances, aboveground and underground storage tanks, disposal areas, groundwater wells, drywells, and sumps. Sampling and testing of soil, surface water, or groundwater were not part of this assessment. 1.2.4 Site Geology and Hydrogeology MNA reviewed published information for the property and surrounding area on surface and subsurface conditions such as topography, drainage, surface water bodies, subsurface geology, and groundwater. MNA used this information to assess the potential for migration and impact of the subject property by releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products at off-site properties. 2271_3 3 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 1.2.5 Data Evaluation and Reporting MNA evaluated the information collected, and prepared this report as part of the assessment. Section 2 presents the site background information; Section 3 user provided information; Section 4 information collected from records review; Section 5 site reconnaissance; Section 6 interviews; Section 7 data gaps; Section 8 key findings and opinion; and Section 9 conclusion. 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS The conclusion presented in this report is based upon the assumption that reasonably ascertainable and relevant information pertaining to the environmental condition of the subject property was trade available to MNA during the assessment. Information obtained from government agencies and other resources is presumed to be accurate and updated. Additionally, information collected in interviews is collected In"good faith"and believed to be true and accurate to the best knowledge of the interviewee. 1.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The Phase I ESA provides a "snapshot" of the property conditions at the time of the assessment. Findings, opinions, and conclusions apply to property conditions existing at the time of the investigation and those reasonably foreseeable. They do not apply to conditions at, or changes to, the property, of which MNA is not aware, could not reasonably be aware, and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. This report is based upon visual observations of the subject property and its vicinity, interpretation of the available historical and regulatory information and documents reviewed, and interviews of individuals with knowledge of the subject or surrounding property. MNA cannot ensure the accuracy of the historical or regulatory information. This report is intended exclusively for the purpose outlined and applies only to the subject property. This Phase I ESA excludes asbestos, lead paint, and investigation of geotechnical concerns. No surface or subsurface sampling was involved. 1.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Phase I ESA was conducted and prepared by MNA for the exclusive use of the COH OHCD. This report shall not be relied upon or transferred to any other party without written authorization from COH OHCD. 1.6 USER RELIANCE This report is an instrument of service of MNA, which summarizes its findings and opinions with respect to recognLed environmental conditions at the subject property. Findings and opinions are predicated on information that MNA obtained on the dates and from individuals stated herein, from public records reviewed, a site reconnaissance, and ancillary Phase I ESA activities. This assessment relies upon the accuracy and completeness of the information provided. The information obtained for flus assessment is used without extraordinary verification. It is possible that other information exists and is discovered,or environmental conditions change subsequent to the submittal of this Phase I ESA report,to which MNA shall not be held responsible for exclusion. 2271_3 4 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION This section contains location and legal description; site and vicinity general characteristics; current subject property use; structures,roads, and other improvements; past subject property use; and current and past use of adjoining properties. 2.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is located at TMK(3) 2-3-001:168 in Hilo, Island of Hawaii. According to the County of Hawaii tax records,there is no physical address assigned,and the parcel is zoned as agricultural (County of Hawaii, 2016). Mohouli Street borders the property to the south, and the intersection of Mohouli and Kukuau Streets is approximately 300 feet west of the subject property. A TMK map is presented in Figure 2. 2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS The subject property is located in Hilo, in eastern Hawaii, approximately 1% miles southwest of Hilo Bay and Waiakea Pond. The subject property was an unimproved vacant vegetated lot with no structures or roads present. The subject property is located adjacent to Mohouli Street. Vacant lands are located nearby to the south southwest. Residential areas are present to the north, south, and east. 2.3 GEOLOGY The Island of Hawaii is of volcanic origin and was accumulated by the combination of Kohala, Mauna Kea, Mauna Loa, Kilauea, and Hualalai volcanoes. The island is comprised of numerous thin, extremely permeable tholeiitic (relatively rich in silica and iron) basalt lava flows (Stearns, 1985). Hawaii, the youngest and largest Hawaiian Island, is larger than all the other Hawaiian Islands combined. Hazlett and Hyndman (1996)describe the island as follows: It [Hawaii Island] sprawls over an area the size of Cormectic ut, spannirig 90 miles from north to south and 80 miles from east to west. Five large volcanoes coalesce to make the visible part of the Big Island; a sixth lies buried beneath the surface. The southern part of the island is still volcanically active and building out along much of the coastline. To the north, volcanism is in the waning stages. Of all the Hawaiian Islands, the Big Island shows the greatest diversity of rocks and landscapes (Hazlett & Hyndman, 1995). The subject property is located on the lower southeastern slopes of the Mauna Loa volcano, an active shield volcano Mauna Loa and the second youngest of the five Hawaiian volcanoes. Mauna Loa volcano is the largest volcano on the Island of Hawaii, making up 50.5% of the land area of the island(Morgan, 1996). The USGS Geological Survey geologic map of Hawaii Island indicates that the subject property is underlain by lavas from a relatively recent Mauna Loa flor from 1880 (Wolfe, E.W. & Morris,J., 1996), 2271_3 5 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. 9 � SJ, !� I °� 0, 0, p�-O 0 0 o o�0, o°s p16, 073:007 �& Subject Property c 070 00'1:168 001:170 009 No Physical Address k �.9* O� 0'�3ar0 Scale 001:122 1000 m Figure 2. TM K Map • , Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Site TMK(3)2-4-001:168 Mohouli Street, Hilo, Hawaii MNA Project No.2271_3 Myounghee Noh& Pa e 6 Associates,L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:158, Hilo, Island of Hawaii The United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service classifies the soil at the subject property as Keaukaha highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 14 percent slopes (series 652, national map unit symbol 2klld), composed primarily of highly decomposed organic material over pahoehoe lava flows, with a depth to bedrock of 4 to 14 inches. This soil is described as well drained with a low to moderately low capacity to transmit water (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) (United States Department of Agriculture, 2016). The land capability classification for this soil is 7s, indicating that this soil has very severe limitations that make it unsuited for cultivation and that restrict its use mainly to grazing, forestland, or wildlife. The "s" subclass indicates that his soil is Made up of soils that have soil limitation within the rooting zone, such as shallowness of the rooting zone, stones, low moisture-holding capacity, low fertility that is difficult to correct, and salinity or sodium content. 2.4 HYDRQLQGYAND HYDRGGEGLOGY The HDDH Safe Drinking Water Branch established an Underground Injection Control(UIC) line to serve as a boundary between drinking water and non-drinking water portions of aquifers. Areas above (mountain side) the UIC line are within drinking water portions of the aquifer, while areas below (ocean side) the UIC are in non-drinking water portions of the underlying aquifer. The subject property is above the UIC in a drinking water portion of the aquifer(Hawaii Department of Health Safe Drinking Water Branch, 2014). The hydraulic gradient of the basal groundwater within the basaltic formation is, in general, from mountain areas to the shoreline. According to the Mink and Lau (1990), the subject property is located above the Hilo aquifer and described the hydrogeology and aquifer as follows: Average annual rainfall starts at 120 inches at the coast, increases to a maximum of 340 inches, then decays to 20 inches on the upper slopes of Mauna Loa. Despite the extraordinary rainfall, perennial streams do not exist south of Wailuku River, Rain easily infiltrates into the permeable basalt. A voluminous basal lens extends at least 4 miles inland of the coast, beyond which high-level water has been encountered. As the groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is basal, it can be found at a depth roughly corresponding to its elevation, or about 350 feet bgs (below ground surface). The flux of groundwater in this basal lens is enormous; the fresh water springs at Hilo-Waiakea have been measured at 150 million gallons per day. The gradient is about 5 feet per mile, and the permeability of the basalt is probably at least 5,000 feet per day (Mink & Lau, 1990). Information for the Hilo aquifer is provided in Table 1 (Mink&Lau, 1990). The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood map for the area (15516608800 September 16, 1988, revised December 21, 2006) indicates that a flood area traverses the midsection of the subject property. This area, comprising about 50-60% of the entire property, is designated special flood hazard area Zone A, areas with a 1% annual chance of flooding inundation, but without base flood elevation determined (Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1988). This flood area is part of the Mohouli area drainage, which is confluent with the Alenaio Flood Control Channel near the University of Hawaii at Hilo campus. 2271_3 7 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii Table I . I-1110 AgUifer Classification Sys'cni Atluifei-Code 80401111 Island Code 8--Hawaii Aquifer Sector 04—Northeast Mauna Loa Aquifer System 01—Hilo Aquifer Type, hydrogeology l—Basal Aquifer Condition l—Unconfined Aquifer Type.geology l—Flank, Horizontally extensive lavas Status Code 11111 Development Stage 1—Currently used utility l—❑riukin Salinity (in m IL Cl-) l—Fresli(<250) Uniqueness l—Irreplaceable Vulnerability to Contamination i—High mglL Cl'-milligram~per liter of ehIori de 2.5 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The subject property was owned by the State of Hawaii. There are no structures on the subject property. It is vacant, unused, and vegetated land. 2.6 STRUCTURES, ROADS, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS No structures, roads, or other improvements had been made to the subject property. No electrical, telephone, sewer, or water service was connected at the subject property. The subject property is accessed from Mohouli Street,along the southern border where storm water drainage was observed along the street. A site reap is presented in Figure 3. 2.7 PAST USES OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Information regarding past uses of the subject property was obtained from a review of tax records (County of Hawaii, 2016), historic topographic snaps and aerial photographs, and interviews. According to the County of Hawaii Real Property Tax Office,the State of Hawaii owns the subject property, and has since 1949. The County of Hawaii does not have property tax records on the subject property prior to 1949. Table 2 summarizes available inforination regarding the historical use and users of the subject property. Z.8 CURRENT AND PAST USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES Information regarding past uses of the adjoining properties was obtained from review of tax records (County of Hawaii, 2015), historic topographic maps and aerial photographs (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2015) and interviews. The property use information is summarized in Table 3. 2271_3 8 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCQ—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001'188, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Table 2. Users and Primary Uses of Subject Property PeriodOwner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use (approx.) (acres) TMK(3) 24-001:168; Mohouli Street,Hilo 2.008-Present State of Hawaii 1 9.091 Undeveloped 0.354 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:178 2008 6.373 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:177 5.003 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 2000-2008 State of Hawaii 1 30.396 Undeveloped 2090 30,396 acres from TMK 3 2-4-001:122 1979-1999 State of Hawaii 1 318.668 Undeveloped 1979 0.517 acres to TMK 3 2-4-001:166 1968-1979 State of Hawaii 1319.205 Undeveloped 1965 319.205 acres from TMK(3) 2-4.041:041 1967-1958 State of Hawaii 1499.827 Undeveloped 0.493 acres to TMK (3) 24-001:119 1967 8.588 acres dropped into a road 6.199 acres to TMK (3) 24-024:072 1.667 acres dropped into a road 1965-1967 State of Hawaii 1 516.774 Undeveloped 6.621 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-024:024 1965 6.021 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-001:019 1.2 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:023 1950-1965 State of Hawaii 1 526.716 Undeveloped 1950 10.205 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-023:131 19.095 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-024:148 1949-1950 State of Hawaii 556.016 Undeveloped 46.344 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-023:053 30.950 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-401:027 13.640 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:038 1949 1.880 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:042 50.000 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:039 7.313 acres from TMK (3) 2-4-001:049 0.313 acres to TMK 3 24-001:052 1949 State of Hawaii 498.890 Undeveloped TMK-Tax Map Key 2271_3 9 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCQ-Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Table 3. Users and Primary Uses of Adjoining Pro erties Period Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use a rox. acres TMK(3) 24-001:176; Mohoali Street,Hilo Adjoining property to the East 2008-Present State of Hawaii 1 5.003 Undeveloped 2008 5.003 acres from TMK 3 2-4-001:168 2000-2008 State of Hawaii 1 30.396 1 Undeveloped 2000 30.396 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:122 1979-1999 State of Hawaii 1 318.668 1 Undeveloped 1979 0.517 acres to TMK(3)2-4-001:166 1968-1979 State of Hawaii 1 319.205 1 Undeveloped 1968 319.205 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:041 1967-1968 State of Hawaii 1499.827 1 Undeveloped 0.493 acres to TMK(3)2-4-001:119 1967 5.588 acres dropped into a road 6.199 acres to TMK(3)2-4-024:072 1.667 acres dropped into a road 1965-1967 State of Hawaii 1516.774 T Undeveloped 6.621 acres to TMK(3)2-4-024:024 1965 6.021 acres to TMK(3)24-001:019 1.2 acres from TMK 3 2-4-001:023 1950-1965 State of Hawaii 1 526.716 1 Undeveloped 1950 10.205 acres to TMK(3) 24-023:131 19.095 acres to TMK 3 2-4-024:148 1949-1950 State of Hawaii 1 556.016 1 Undeveloped 46.344 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-023:053 30.950 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:027 13.640 acres from TMK(3) 24-001:035 1 1.880 acres from TMK(3)2-4-001:042 50.000 acres from TMK(3) 24-001:039 7.313 acres from TMK(3)2-4-001:049 0.313 acres to TMK 3 2-4-001:052 1949 State of Hawaii 1498.890 1 Undeveloped TMK(3)2-4-073:002; 507 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the Northeast 2002-Present Julian, William S. Trust 1.256 Residential Julian, Catherine: C. Trust 1994-2002 Chu, Yih-Honig 1.256 Residential Che, Huei-Mei C. 1991-1994 Yamanaka, Melvin 1. 1.256 Residential Yamanaka, Delia M. 1991 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.256 Residential 1991 1.256 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 1994-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180,812 Undeveloped 2271_3 10 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Period pw,nerlLessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use (approx.) acres 1986-1990 Auto import of Hawaii. Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undevelopc(.] JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-059:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK., Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. ;7; Vacant JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc, Kasons, Inc. 1980 373.235 Vac ui l John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Vacant Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Vacant Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard l�)?l 34.170 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:015 l 95 l Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Vacant Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3)2-4-073:003; 815 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the North 2006-Present Martins, David Roy 1.220 Undeveloped Martins, Demetra Leslie 1992-2006 Martins, David R. 1.220 Undeveloped Martins,DeMetra L. 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.220 Undeveloped 1991 1.220 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 2271_3 11 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii Period OwnerlLesseelSub-Lessee Area Primary Use a rox. (acres) 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii_ Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 KUkUall Development Corporation 180,812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:026 1982 4.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc, 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Fauns & Ranches,Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK,Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373,235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolrnie Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK 3 2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd, TMK (3)2-4-073:004; 817 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the North 2003-Present Okuda, Chad Tatsuo 1.129 Residential Okuda, Tiffanie Wan 1992-2003 Abe, Nathan N. 1.129 Residential Abe, Tracy M. T. 2271_3 12 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii Period OwnerlLesseelSuh-Lessee Area Primary Use (approx.) acres 1992 Taniguchi, Bary K. 1.129 Residential Abe,Tracy M. T. 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.129 Residential 1991 1.129 Acres from TMK (3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 130.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180,812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:026 198? 4.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. Kasons, Inc. 11784-11)82 373.235 JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc, Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tohrrie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches. Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK(3)2-4-073:005; 825 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the North 2271_3 13 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001'188, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Period pwnerlLessec/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use (a rax.) acres 1996-Present Park, Myoung N. 1,005 Residential 1991-1996 Gutierrez,Jose G. 1.005 Residential Gutierrez, Yolanda S. 1991 Four Real Partnership 1,005 Residential 1991 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.005 Residential 1991 1.005 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 UndevelopedUndeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180,812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Farms & Ranches,Inc. 11)82-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180,812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Kates, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373,235 Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Tnrst 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 37; ?_, Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:015 2271_3 14 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii Period OwnerlLessee/Sub-Lessee Area primary Use (approx.) (acres) 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3) 2-4-073:005; Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the North 2004-Present Goodwin,James Yun Lun 1.000 Undeveloped Goodwin,Joy Hatsue Yamashita 19c)l-2104 Tavares, Marion R. I.000 Undeveloped Tavares, Laura G. 1991 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1 .000 Undeveloped 1991 1.000 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 1994-1991 HSC, Inc. 184.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.$12 Undeveloped 1986-1994 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180,812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.. Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 190.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:026 1982 0.351 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.942 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc, Farms &Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373,235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts C❑ oration Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373,235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. 2271_3 15 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH CHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:188, Hila, Island of Hawaii Period OwnerlLessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use (approx.) (acres) Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34,170 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3) 2-4-073:007; 833 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining ro erh° to the North 2014-Present Sugai, Brian T. Trust 1.000 Residential Wang-Sugai,Ning Trust 2014 Sugai, Brian Tadashi 1.000 Residential Wang-Sugai,Ning Wan 2009-2014 Tseng_Trust 1.000 Residential 2004-2009 Tseng, Raymond C€ii-Jen 1,000 Residential Tseng, Rose Yun Li 2001-2004 Van Der Hel, Cornelis Pieter 1.000 Residential Karow, Vena Mae Paradis,Edward F. 1992-2001 .non Residential Paradis,Yasuko 1992 Young, Mary J. 1.000 Residential 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.000 Residential 1991 1.000 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-199[1 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 180,812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa G EK, Inc, Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Fauns & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-059:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK,Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1 9K" Kasons, Inc. '7-1).?' Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation 2271_3 16 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:188, Hila, Island of Hawaii PCHOd Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use (a P 3ror:.l acres Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. l 950 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Fauns &Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust Fa Linger 1978-1980 Robert Richardson Trust 373.2,; Undeveloped Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:015 1951 Akatin Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK(3)2-4-473:048; 847 Kukuau Street,Hilo Adjoining property to the West 2008-Present Sabnani, Lovina Harirann 1.402 Residential 2004-200$ Palea, Fredrick L. 1.002 Residential Fergerstrom-Palea, Cindy-Lu Takase,Glenn M. 1995-2002 Residential Takase, Kayleen K. i tt�}�' Kubota, Peter K. I992-1� $ Sonomura,Julann M. K. i {)i}-' Residential 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1.002 Residential 1991 1.002 Acres from TMK(3) 24-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180.812 Undeveloped 1986-1994 Auto import of Hawaii, Inc. 180,812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc_ 180.812 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 188.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:026 1 yx2 0.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.942 2271_3 17 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:188, Hila, Island of Hawaii Period Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use (approx.) acres Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katon, Inc. I Q x 0 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolmie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches,Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust Fay Linger 197$-1954 Robert Richardson Trust 373 235 Undeveloped Hawaiian Trust Co.. Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 JUNIUS Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-•008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3)2-4-073:009; 851 Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the West 2002-Prescnt Deetman, Louis JlHcicna C. Trust 1.02.7 Undeveloped 2000-2002 Deetman, Louis J. F. 1.027 Undeveloped Deetman, Helena C. 2000 Deetman, Louis J. F. 1.027 Undeveloped 1992-2000 Deetman, Louis J. F. 1.027 Undeveloped Deetman. Helena C. 1992 T G Exchange, Inc. 1.027 Undeveloped 1992 Meyer, Waltraud 1.027 Undeveloped 1991-1992 Sunrise Estates Joint Venture 1,027 Undeveloped 1991 1.027 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 130.812 Undeveloped 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii, Inc. 130.812 Undeveloped 2271_3 18 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:188, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Period Owner/Lessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use {,i 3ror.l acres Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped .1T Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Fan-ns & Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180,812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:025 1982 0.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK,Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped JT Trading Co., Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tohnie Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373.235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.1170 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407,405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK (3)2-4-073:010; Kukuau Street, Hilo Adjoining property to the Southwest 2015-Present Ching, Creighton Lowell Trust 1.002 Undeveloped 1991-2015 Ching, Creighton L. 1.002 Undeveloped 1991 Sunrise Estates Joint Ventaire 1.002 Undeveloped 1991 1.002 Acres from TMK(3) 2-4-008:014 1990-1991 HSC, Inc. 180,812 Undeveloped 1990 Chiaki Matsuo 180,812 Undeveloped 2271_3 19 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii Period OwnerlLesseelSuh-Lessee Area Primary Use (approx.) acres ` 1986-1990 Auto Import of Hawaii. Inc. 180.812 Undeveloped Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1986 Kasons, Inc. 180.812 Undevelopc(.] JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms &Ranches, Inc. 1982-1986 Kukuau Development Corporation 180.812 Undeveloped 193.451 acres to TMK(3) 24-008:026 1982 0.361 acres from TMK(3)2-4-069:039 Area revised to 373.902 Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980-1982 Kasons, Inc. Undeveloped JT Trading Co.,Ltd. Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc. Farms & Ranches,Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Siegfred Kagawa GEK, Inc. Katco, Inc. 1980 Kasons, Inc. 373.235 Undeveloped John Stratton Tolinie Auto Imports of Hawaii,Inc. Farms & Ranches, Inc. Sea Gifts Corporation Geo Richardson Trust 1978-1980 Fay Linger 373.235 Undeveloped Robert Richardson Trust Hawaiian Trust Co., Ltd. Robert Richardson 1951-1978 Julius Richardson Trust 373,235 Undeveloped Geo Richardson Trust Thomas Guard 1951 34.170 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-008:015 1951 Akana Richardson Estate 407.405 Undeveloped Kinoole Development Co., Ltd. TMK(3) 24-001:122; Komohana Street, Hilo Aojoining property to the South 2001_present State of Hawaii 1 267,030 Undeveloped 30.000 acres to TMK{3}2-4-:001:169 1.42 acres to TMK(3)2-4-001:170 'flil Area revised to 323.470 acres 17.77 acres from TMK(3)2-4-001:012 4.594 acres to TMK(3)24-001:171 2271_3 20 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii Period pw,nerlLessee/Sub-Lessee Area Primary Use a rox. acres 2000-2001 State of Hawaii 281.174 Undeveloped 2000 30.396 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-001:168 7.118 acres dropped into a road 1979-1999 State of Hawaii I 31 8.668 1 Undeveloped 1979 0.517 acres to TMK(3)2-4-001:166 1968-1979 State of Hawaii 319.205 Undeveloped 1968 319.205 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:041 1967-1968 State of Hawaii 1 499,827 1 Undeveloped 0.493 acres to TMK(3)2-4-001:119 1967 8.588 acres dropped into a road 6.199 acres to TMK(3)2-4-024:072 1.667 acres dropped into a road 1955-1967 State of Hawaii I 516.774 Undeveloped 6.621 acres to TMK(3)2-4-024:024 196; 6.021 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-001:019 1.2 acres from TMK(3)2-4-001:023 1.500 acres from Lanikaula Street 1950-1965 State of Hawaii 526.716 1 Undeveloped 1950 10.205 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-023:131 19.095 acres to TMK(3) 2-4-024:148 1949-1950 State of Hawaii 1 556.016 1 Undeveloped 46.344 acres to TMK (3) 2-4-023:053 30.950 acres from TMK(3) 2-4-001:027 13.640 acres from TMK(3) 24-001:038 1949 1.880 acres from TMK(3)2-4-001:042 50.000 acres from TMK(3) 24-001:039 7.313 acres from TMK(3)2-4-001:049 0.313 acres to TMK (3)2--4-001:052 1949State of Hawaii 49$.890 Undeveloped TM-K-Tax Map Key 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION User provided information was obtained by having a representative of the County (future landowner and manager of the subject property), Alan Ruda with the CUH UHCD, complete a "User Questionnaire" administered by MNA. The information in the following sections was obtained from the questionnaire. 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS 4R ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS Mr. Rudo was unaware of any environmental cleanup liens or use limitations for the subject property. 2271_3 21 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168,Hila, Island of Hawaii 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE Mr. Rudo was unaware of any past releases, specific chemicals, spills or other chemical releases, or environmental cleanups that have taken place at the subject property. Mr. Ruda was not aware of any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the subject property. 3.3 VALUATION REDUCTION The land is being transferred under the Governor's Executive Order, from the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to the COH OHCD. There will be no financial transaction. 3.4 REASON FOR PERFORMING THE PHA SE I ESA The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify any recognized environmental conditions at the subject property, within the scope of ASTM Standard 1527-13, for due diligence related to the potential transfer of property ownership from DLNR to COH OHCD and for lease to a non-profit organization for development of senior housing. 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW Under ASTM 1527-13, records are to be reviewed by the environmental professional who may help identify RECs in connection with the subject property. 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES MNA used Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), to search standard federal and state government databases for hazardous substance or petroleum product releases that could impact the subject property. A copy of the EDR report is provided in Appendix A. ASTM E 1527-13 specifies a minimum search distance for specific environmental record sources. The following sources are specified for incidents or sites within one mile of the subject property: • Federal NPL site list • Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities list • State Sites of Interest The following sources are specified for incidents or sites within %2 mile of the subject property: • Federal Delisted NPL site list • Federal CERCLIS list ■ Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list ■ Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list • State Brownfield Sites • State Hazardous Waste Sites ■ State landfill and/or solid waste disposal site list ■ State leaking UST list • State voluntary cleanup program sites The following sources are for incidents on the subject and adjoining properties: 2271_3 22 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii ■ Federal RCRA generators list • State registered UST list Finally, the following are for incidents for the subject property: ■ Federal ERNS list • Federal Institutional Controls (IC) and Engineering (EC) Registries • State IC and EC Registries • State releases list The following subsections summarize the results of the EDA records review for the datasets listed above (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.1 Federal National Priorities List The NPL, maintained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is a list of highly contaminated sites that have been identified by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. There were no NPL sites identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.2 Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List The RCRA CORRACTS TSD facilities list maintained by the EPA contains generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste that have reported violations and are subject to corrective actions. No RCRA CCRRACTS TSD facilities were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.3 Delisted NPL Site List This site list, maintained by the EPA, contains delisted NPL sites. No delisted NPL sites were identified within '/2 mile of the subject property(Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.4 Federal CERCLIS List The CERCLIS list, maintained by the EPA, contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the NPL list, as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. No federal CERCLIS sites were identified within '/2 mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.5 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List The CERCLIS NFRAP list, maintained by the EPA, contains designated CERCLA sites that, to the best of the EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined that no further steps will be taken to list the sites on the NPL. No CERCLIS NFRAP sites were identified within `/z mile of the subject property the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 2271_3 23 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 4.1.6 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities List The RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list, maintained by the EPA, contains RCRA permitted facilities that treat, store,or dispose of hazardous waste. No RCRA TSD facilities listed were identified within `/2 mile of the subject property(Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.7 State Brownfield Sites The State Brownfield Sites database, maintained by the HDOH HEER Office, is an inventory of state designated brownfield sites. Under the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act, a brownfield is defined as "real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant." The EPA provides grants and loans to state and local governments for the assessment, cleanup, and redevelopment of these properties. Properties located on the state brownfield list may have received federal funding under this program or be designated a brownfield for state administration or funding purposes. No state brownfield sites were identified within '/2 mile of the subject property(Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.8 State Hazardous Waste Sites The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by responsible parties. No state hazardous waste sites were identified within '/z mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). One state hazardous waste site was identified at greater than '/2 mile,at 600 Wailoa Street, located j ust over 3/4 mile east northeast and downgradient from the subject property. The site, Lanakila Homes Phase 3134 was identified as having heavy metal lead soil contamination that was managed with controls. Another state hazardous waste site was identified at a non-geocoded location on Kaumana Drive. The site,identified as HELCO Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 20935 at Pole No. 7 was identified as having total petroleum hydrocarbons at levels lower than 50 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), and was issued a No Further Action (NFA) letter on 05 Juice 2012. The closest location of Kaumana Drive in proximity of the subject property is 3/4 mile upgradient. Please refer to Section 8.2 for determination of impact of these sites on the subject property. 4.1.9 State Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites The HDOH records contain an inventory of permitted landfills in the State of Hawaii, No permitted solid waste landfills, incinerators, or transfer stations were identified within `/z mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.10 State LUST List The state LUST list, maintained by the HDOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB), maintains an inventory of sites with LUSTs. EDR identified no LUST facilities within `/z mile of the subject property(Environmental Data Resources,Inc.,2016). 2271_3 24 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 4.1.11 State Voluntary Cleanup Sites The state voluntary cleanup sites list, maintained by the HDOH HEER Office, contains sites participating in the state's Voluntary Response Program (VRP). No facilities participating in the state VRP were identified within 1/2 mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.12 Federal RCRA Generators List The RCRA Generators list, maintained by the EPA, contains small and large quantity generators of RCRA hazardous waste. The determination of generator size is used to establish the risk that the facility poses to public health and the environment and consequently,the amount of regulation and reporting required. Large Quantity Generators (LQG) are facilities that generate more than a 1,004 kg/month of hazardous waste and/or more than I kg/month of acute hazardous waste. Small Quantity Generators(SQG)are facilities that generate less than 1,400 kg/month but snore than 100 kg/month of hazardous waste and/or less than I kg/month of acute hazardous waste. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators (CESQG) are facilities that generate less than 144 kg/month of hazardous waste and/or less than 1 kg/month of acute hazardous waste. The EPA also maintains the RCRA NLR list. This list contains facilities that were once on the RCRA generators list, but are no longer in business, no longer in business at the listed address, or are no longer generating hazardous waste substances in quantities that require reporting. No SQG, LQG, or CESQG were identified on the subject or adjoining properties (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.13 State Registered UST List The HDOH SHWB maintains a database of known UST. EDR identified no UST facilities within '/z mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.14 Federal ICs and ECs Registries Federal ICs and ECs sites are federally listed sites that are required to implement institutional controls or engineering controls. Because the sites may continue to be impacted by past use,future use of the property may be restricted in order to protect human health and the environment. Land use controls can be either ICs or ECs. Institutional controls are limitations on how the property may be used such as limiting use to industrial activities. Engineering controls are physical structures or devices located on the property that contain or limit exposure to contamination. Engineering controls need to be maintained or protected to be effective. No Federal lCs or ECs were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.15 State ICs and ECs Registries These sites are state listed sites that have either state-required institutional controls or engineering controls in place. Because the sites may continue to be impacted by past use, future use of the property may be restricted in order to protect human health and the environment. Land Use Controls can be either ICs or ECs. ICs are limitations on how the property may be used such as limiting use to industrial activities. ECs are physical structures or devices located on the property that contain or limit exposure to contamination. ECs need to be maintained or protected to be 2271_3 25 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii effective. No State IC or EC were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environtnental Data Resources, Inc-., 2016). 4.1.16 Federal ERNS List The ERN S list, maintained by the EPA,contains C:ERCLA hazardous substance releases or spills, as maintained at the National Response Center. No incidents were identified on the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1,17 State Releases List The HDOH HEER Office maintains a database of known releases to the environment of hazardous material or petroleum products. No release incidents were identified within t/8 mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.1.18 U.S. Brownfields U.S. Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. No V.S. Brownfields sites were identified within one mile of the subject property (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). 4.2 ADDITIONAL RECORD SOURCES MNA reviewed additional environmental records as needed and available. Additional record sources filed by the HDOH SHWB were requested. MNA reviewed HDOH HEER Office online records for the subject and adjoining properties, and an Environmental Assessment that was completed in 2009 for the subject property. 4.2.1 Subject Property MNA requested records for review from the HDOH SHWB on 12 October 2016 and RFD on 13 October 2016. HDOH SHWB and HFD responded that they had no records on file for the subject property. MNA reviewed publicly available information posted on the HDOH HEER Office website, http://eha-web.doh.hawaii.govleha-cma/Leaders/HEER/public-records, and found that the subject property was not listed on the HEER Sites of Interest Lookup Spreadsheet or the HEER Emergency Response Lookup Spreadsheet. MNA reviewed the HDOE Environmental Health Warehouse (http:Ileha-web.doh.hawaii.gov/ehwl), and found that there were no sites of interest shown on the subject property. MNA reviewed the Final Environmental Assessment,for Fire Administration Support Complex, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, TAX (3) 2-4-001:176 & 178 (Previously Parcel 168 [portion]),dated June 2009,which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the subject property(M&E Pacific, Inc., 2009). 4.2.2 Surrounding Properties MNA requested records for review from the HDOH SHWB on 12 October 2016 and HFD on 13 October 2016. HDOH SHWB and HFD responded that they had no records on file for the adjoining properties. 2271_3 26 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCD—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii NINA reviewed publicly available information posted on the HDOH HEER Office website, http:Ileha-web.doh.hawaii.govleha-ema/Leaders/HEER/public-records, and found that the adjoining properties were not listed on the NEER Sites of Interest Lookup Spreadsheet or the HEER Emergency Response Lookup Spreadsheet. NWA reviewed the HDOH Environmental Health Warehouse (http:Ileha-web.doh.hawaii.gov/ehw/), and found that there were no sites of interest shown on the adjoining properties. MNA reviewed the Final Environmental Assessment_for Fire Administration Support Complex, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 & 178 (Previously Parcel 168 [portion]). dated June 2009,which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the adjoining property to the east (M&E Pacific, Inc.,2009). The proposed Fire Administration Support Complex would include administration, dispatch, and preparation/training buildings, warehouse, fire station, museum, open and covered training areas, site infrastructure, and paved access and parking areas. The use would include all operations and trainings. Please refer to Section 8.2 for determination of impact of these sites on the subject property. 4.3 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NINA reviewed historical use information for the subject property, including aerial photographs and United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps. No lire insurance maps were available. 4.3.1 Historical Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs of the subject, adjoining, and surrounding properties were provided by EDR (Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,2016), Photographs from the years 1954, 1975, 1977, 1985, 1992, and 2000 were reviewed. Table 4 provides the details for those photos. Table 4. Aerial Photograph Details Date Image Tye Approximate Scale 2000 C 1992 C 1985 C 1,,:500' 1977 BIW 1975 C 1954 BIW BIW-Black and white photograph C-Color For the reviewed aerial photographs, the following observations were made. 1054: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. No roads were observable on the map in the area surrounding the subject property. A few building structures were observed approximately 1,500 feet northeast of the subject property. 1975: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. Roadways were evident to the northeast of the subject property, with the alignment of the current day Komohana and Kukuau Streets. More buildings were observed approximately 1,000-1,500 feet northeast of the subject property. 2271_3 27 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 1977: No change from the 1975 photo, except that a roadway with the alignment of current day Mohouli Street is evident. 1985: The development to the northeast has grown, with structures now present on the west side of Komohana Street, within 1,040 feet of the subject property. A structure and possibly agricultural fields are depicted north of(on the opposite side of)Kukuau Street. Apparent residential development is visible approximately 2,040 feet to the northwest of the subject property. 1992: No change from the 1985 photo. 2000: Residential development to the northeast and southwest has increased to within 500 feet of the subject property in both directions along Kukuau Street. MNA reviewed historical aerial imagery available on Google Earth. Photographs from the years 2000, 2010, 2011,2012,2013, and 2014 were reviewed. For the reviewed aerial photographs, the following observations were made: 2000: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties east,south, and west. The surrounding area was undeveloped and covered in vegetation. Residential structures on the adjoining properties to the north were evident. 2010: No building structures were visible on the subject and adjoining properties to the east and south. Increased residential development is visible to the north and west, along Kukuau Street. 2011: Two photos were available for 2011, from March and June, both under moderate cloud cover. No change from the 2010 photo. 20t2. Four photos were available for 2012, from May, June, November, and December. One change is evident on TMK(2)2-4-001:177, to the east of the subject property. The parcel was graded and active construction/development is evident in the photos. 2013: Two photos were available for 2013, from January and April. No change from the 2012 photo is shown in the January photo. The April photo was taken under thick cloud cover, and the subject property and surrounding area are not visible. 2014: Six photos were available for 2014, from August. Two of the photos were taken under thick cloud cover, and subject property and surrounding area are not visible. In the other four photos, development at parcel 177 appears to be nearing completion. The development is the Mohouli Elderly Care Facility. 4.3.2 Historical Topographic Maps USGS topographic maps that cover the subject property and vicinity were reviewed. Maps were available for the years 1917, 1932, 1963, 1981, 1995, and 2013 (Environmental Data Resources, Inc., 2016). A copy of the historical topographic maps provided by EDR is included in Appendix A. The maps of the subject property and surrounding area depicted the following: 1917: The subject property was depicted to lie within the lava flow of 1881. No structures are depicted on the subject property or in the surrounding area. Hilo town is visible, 2271_3 28 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH OHCQ—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:188, Hilo, Island of Hawaii approximately 1.5 miles northeast. A railroad is shown approximately 1.5 miles to the south of the subject property. 1932: No change at the subject property or surrounding area from the 1917 map. 1963: More building structures were observed within '/2 mile of the subject property to the east. The railroad south of the subject property is no longer present; instead there is residential development in this area. 1981: No change at the subject property or surrounding area from the 19153 map. 1995: Kukuau Street is depicted extending laterally north of the subject property. Multiple scattered structures are present north and west of the subject property. 2013: No significant changes at the subject property or surrounding arca from the 1995 cxccpt that Mohouli Street is depicted and borders the subject property to the south. 4.3.3 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map No Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were available for the subject property. 2271_3 29 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. ` Suhje Pro erty B dary r + w �i + # + t ♦ + t i + ♦ + * + r t f�+ i + ♦ + Propa e AST + t + t + « ♦ t • + t t +rte t t � +�► + + ♦ t + + r r t + r t t ♦ ♦ + • + �� ♦ + + met • + +*#+ + + ► # + + ► + r • t + t + # + ��j + i t # + # # w # i t i ♦ i ♦ • ; ♦ t i i # # 415/? i Vim* +V + # ♦ + ♦ t t 4C • # ♦ + �f Scale - - — _ W1 _ .Start 100 ft Figure 3. Site Map — — — Path Walked MUM Water drainage Phase I Environmental Site Assessment + • + TMK(3)24-601:158 t t + Thick Vegetation Mohoull Street, Hilo, Hawaii t + • Myounghee Noh& MN Project No.2271 3 Associates,L.L.G. Transformer Pole Pae 30 - COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The site reconnaissance was conducted by Phillip Cabanila and Herbertson Santos of MNA on 05 December 2015. The site reconnaissance focused on identifying recognized environmental conditions with the ability to impact the subject property. A site map of the subject property is prescnted in Figurc 3. 5.1 METHODOLOGYAND LIMITING CONDITIONS The site reconnaissance was conducted by visually inspecting the subject property and adjoining properties on foot. MNA looked for a variety of environmental hazard indicators including, but not limited to,stained surface soil,dead or stressed vegetation,hazardous substances,aboveground and underground storage tanks, disposal areas, groundwater wells, drywells, and sumps. Inspection of wastewater system or building materials was not part of this assessment. Figure 3 presents the path walked. Photographs from the site reconnaissance are presented in Appendix B. 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING The subject property is located in the town of Hilo, uphill towards the Kaumana area, on the north side of Mohouli Street, west of Komohana Street and east of Kukuau Street(Photograph 1). The immediate surroundings of the subject property are residential and agricultural properties. The subject property was adjoined on the north and west by residential properties and was adjoined on the east by forest land owned by the State of Hawaii. Mohouli Street runs along the southern border of the subject property. 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS At the time of the site reconnaissance, there were no structures observed on the subject property. No transfonners were observed on the subject or adjoining properties. The subject property was observed to be undeveloped land with thick vegetation(Photographs 1-7). Along the Mohouli Street, three storm water drainages were observed. The drainages were indicated by yellow markers placed directly to the east of each runoff drain area (Photographs 3- 4). MNA personnel observed the runoff areas were constructed using asphalt and concrete, with a metal grate covering the drainage (Photograph 4). At the time of the site reconnaissance, no standing surface water was observed around or within the runoff access areas. Trails cut through the vegetation were previously cut along the east and wet boundaries of the subject property (Photographs 6-7 and 11). These were utilized as access points by MNA personnel to observe the northeast and northwest corners of the subject property. The property corners were marked with survey stakes and flagging tape(Photographs I-2, 8-9, and 12). The adjoining property to the east of the subject property was undeveloped land, with thick vegetation,similar to the subject property(Photograph 14). Residential properties to the north and west of the subject property were observed (Photograph 15). No RECs were identified on the adjoining properties. 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS No structures were observed on the subject property; therefore, no interior observations were warranted. 2271_3 31 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 5.5 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS Hazardous substances and petroleum products were not observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. Small amounts of household debris were observed on the southern boundary of the subject property(Photograph 5). 5.6 ABOVE GROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS One above-ground storage tank(AST)containing propane was observed on parcel(2)2-4-073:008, to the west of the subject property. The AST was observed to be in good condition (Photograph 13), with no stressed vegetation. MNA did not observe any indications of underground storage tanks(USTs) or ASTs or associated accessories. such as vent pipes, fill ports, or dispensers, on the subject property. 6.0 INTERVIEWS MNA interviewed Gordon C. Heit, the District Land Agent with the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division, the agency responsible for managing the subject property. The interview was administered by Jessica Walsh of MNA, via email. MNA attempted to interview the Hilo Police Department, but they said that they did not have the time to comply with the request. During the site reconnaissance, MNA attempted to interview those present at the residential adjoining properties, but no one was available at the time. MNA called the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works for an interview, but they had not returned the phone call at the time of this writing. 6.7 Gordon C. Hest, DLNR On 43 November 2016 MNA interviewed Gordon Heit. Mr.Heit is the current District Land Agent with the State of Hawaii DLNR. The State of Hawaii is the owner of the subject property. He indicated that he didn't know of any specific chemicals present or once present at the subject property. Mr. Heit stated that the adjoining property to the east, parcel 176, is under Executive Order 4223 to the County of Hawaii for public safety and related purposes. An Environmental Assessment was completed by the County of Hawaii Fire Department as a requirement to the issuance of Executive Order 4223. Mr. Heit indicated that he had no knowledge of any spills, chemical releases, environmental cleanups, environmental cleanup liens, engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls at the site. 7.4 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS MNA encountered a data gap during this Phase I ESA; MNA was unable to thoroughly inspect the ground surface and much of the interior of the subject property due to the presence of dense vegetation. There were no indications of illegal dumping, except for a few small trashes (Photograph 5),and therefore this is considered a minor data gap,as it is not anticipated that illegal dumpsites are hidden by the vegetation. There were no deviations from the Standard Practice,for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (ASTM International,2013). 2271_3 32 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii 8.0 KEY FINDINGS AND OPINION This section evaluates the key findings of this assessment and makes a determination as to the presence RECs, if any. 8.7 Subject Property No records of NPL sites, Federal RCRA CDRRACTS and Nan-CDRRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted National Priority List sites, Federal or state CERCLIS sites, Federal CERCLIS NFRAP sites,landfill or solid waste disposal sites,State Leaking Underground Storage Tank List sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, Federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sties, Institutional Control slEngineering Controls registries, Federal ERNS list sites, Federal or State Brownfields sites were identified at the subject property. Information provided as part of the interview conducted or user questionnaire did not indicate any RECs. No recognized environmental conditions were identified on the subject property based on the historic aerial photograph or topographic map review. During the site reconnaissance, MNA observed no indication of REC. 8.2 Surrounding Area No records of NPL sites, Federal RCRA CORRACTS and Non-CDRRACTS Treatment Storage Disposal Facilities, Delisted National Priority List sites, Federal CERCLIS sites, Federal CERCLIS NFRAP sites,landfill or solid waste disposal sites,State Leaking Underground Storage Tank List sites, State Voluntary Cleanup sites, Federal RCRA Generator sites, State registered UST sties, Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls registries, Federal ERNS list sites, Federal or State Brownfields sites were identified in the area surrounding the subject property. Information provided as part of the interview conducted or user questionnaire did not indicate any RECs. No recognized environmental condilions were identified in the surrounding area based on the historic aerial photograph or topographic map review. 8.2.1 Nan- REC During the site reconnaissance, MNA observed one propane aboveground storage tank (AST) located on the adjoining property to the west, TMK (2) 2-4-073.008. The AST was in good condition, and there was no stressed vegetation. Therefore, the AST is not considered a REC. EDR identified two hazardous waste sites located 3/4 mile away from the subject property: 6001Nailoa Street, Located 1/4 anile and downgradient from the subject property was the Lanakila Homes Phase 3S-4 site. The site was identified as having heavy metal and lead contaminated soils present,and managed with controls. Due to the distance and proximity of this site from the subject property, it is not considered a REC. Non-Geocoded Location on Kaumana Drive, The HELLO Pole-Mounted Transformer No. 20938 at Pole No. 7 was identified as raving petroleum contamination in the soil. The contaminated soil was removed, and a No Further Action letter was issued on 05 June 2012. Due to the distance of this site from the subject property, this is not considered a REC. MNA reviewed the Final Environmental Assesyment_for Fire Administration Support Complex, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, TMK (3) 2-4-001:176 & 178 (Previously Parcel 168 2271_3 33 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hilo, Island of Hawaii /portion]), dated June 2009,which made no mention of hazardous materials or petroleum products at the adjoining property to the east(M&E Pacific, Inc., 2009). The proposed Fire Administration Support Complex would include administration, dispatch, and preparation/training buildings, warehouse, fire station, museum, open and covered training areas, site infrastructure, and paved access and parking areas. The use would include all operations and trainings. While the EA indicated no existing condition or impact from the constriction or use of the facility related to hazardous materials or petroleum products that could impact the subject property, MNA notes that should the facility be constructed and used as outlined in the EA, mock fire training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the inin;ediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. 9.0 CONCLUSION MNA performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13 of the subject property identified as TMK(3)2-4-001:168 in Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 7.0 of this report. This assessment has not revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions based on existing conditions at the time of this Phase I site assessment; however, should the Fire Administration Support Complex be constructed on the adjoining property to the east and used as outlined in the EA, mock fire training including staging fires of burning materials and associated suppression techniques could impact air quality in the immediate vicinity of the facility, including the subject property. 2271_3 34 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. COH ❑HC❑—Phase I Environmental Site Assessment TMK(3)2-4-001:168, Hila, Island of Hawaii REFERENCES ASTM International. (2013). Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. West Conshohocken: ASTM International. Envirormental Data Resources, Inc. (2016, October 2). FirstSearch Report far COW OHCD Mohouli PI-11. Shelton: Environmental Data Resources,Inc.Retrieved May 20,2013,from Web Soil Survey. http:I/websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htin Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1988, 09 16). FEMA Flood Map Service Center. Retrieved June 3, 2016, from https://msc.fema.gov/poitall Hawaii Department of Health Safe Drinking Water Branch. (2014,November). UIC Map q f Gahu. Retrieved May 19, 2016, from Underground Injection Control (UIQ Program: http:/Ihawa i i.go v/he a lth/env i ro n m e nta l/water/sdwb/u i c/pdflo a h tl i c,p d f Hazlett, R. W., & Hyndman, D. W. (1996). Roadside Geology gf'Hawai'i. Missoula, Montana: Montana Press Pubishing Company. M&E Pacific, Inc. (2.009). Final Environmental Assessment for Fire Administration Support Complex, Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, TMK(3)2-4-001:176& 178(Previously Parcel 168[portion]). Honolulu: County of Hawaii Department of Public works Building Division. MacDonald, G. A., & Abott, A. T. (1996). Volcanoes in the Sea. Honolulu: Univeristy of Hawaii Press, Mink, J. F., & Lau, L. S. (1990). Aquifer Identification and Classification ,far Hawaii.- Groundwater awaii:Groundwater Protection Strategy.far Hawaii. University of Hawaii, Water Resources Research Center. Morgan, J. (1996). Hawaii:A Unique GeogropIty. Honolulu. The Bess Press, Inc. Stearns, H. T. (1985). Geology q f the State of Hawaii. Palo A Ito: Pacific Books. United States Department of Agriculture. (2016). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Retrieved October 19, 2016, from Web Soil Survey: http://websoils-urvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.litm Wolfe,E.W.&Morris,J.(1996). Geologic Map of the Island o f Hawaii. Washington,D.C.: United States Geological Survey. 2271_3 35 Myounghee Noh&Associates, L.L.C. Hale Ula U Mohouli Affordable Housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment APPENDIX 5 Market Study Preliminary Findings [This page intentionally left blanl►[ Coffiers INTERNATIONAL Residential Rental Demand Study Hale Gla G Mohouli, Hilo, HI PRELIMINARY FINDINGS Prepared for. Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Prepared by: COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL HAWAII 220 S. King Street Suite 1800 Honolulu, H# 96813 808.524.2666 January 15, 2021 SUMMARYColers OF FINDINGS In order to determine the demand for residential rentals, we analyzed the potential trade area that the target market or renters would likely come from. We then analyzed the demographics of households in this trade as well as the existing rental inventory to estimate the potential demand for additional rental units for the Hale Ola O Mohouli project(the "Property") in Hilo. TARGET TRADE AREA Colliers identified the primary trade area as the City of Hilo where the Property is located. While there is likely enough demand within the primary trade area, we also examined secondary trade areas just outside of Hilo.Theses trade areas extended north to Pepee keo and south to Kurtistown. Secondary Paukala i iil0 �k. Primary Secondary KcJ.... 1SUrtkSSr7wt 3C Hawuan Paradise Perk Orchidlands Mountain Estates View Hawakian Hawaiian Beaches CD Acres Ainaloa C3w Eern Acres Nanawale Estates Eden Rac Pahoa t3a Hilo Residential Rental Deniand Study 1 Colers SUMMARY OF • MARKET INVENTORY The target market for Hale Ole O Mohouli are low-income family and elderly households. We examined the State affordable housing inventory in the trades areas as of October 2020. While this inventory includes apartment projects over 15 units for low-income residents (30% to 605/a AMI), there may also be individual-awned properties under Section 8 which are not accounted for in our supply analysis. These projects have no vacancies with waiting lists as long as seven years. There are 1,001 low-income housing units in the primary trade area and an additional 264 in the secondary trade area. Elderly units account for about 38% of these units. One-bedroom and two- bedroom units make up nearly 80%of the total units. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVENTORY Project Location units Type Studios IBR 2BR 3BR 4BR+ PRIMARY TRADEAREA Haili Elderly Hilo 36 E 0 36 0 0 0 Kamana Elderly Hilo fit E 4 61 4 0 4 Kinoole5eniorResidences Hilo 30 E 0 30 0 0 0 Mohouli HtsSenior Hilo 182 E 0 182 4 0 0 Hale0laloa Hilo 50 E(PH) 20 30 0 0 0 Pomaikai Homes Hilo 20 E(PH) 10 10 0 0 0 E Komo Mai Hilo 45 F 0 35 10 ❑ 4 HaleHoaloha Hilo 81 F 0 12 30 30 9 Hale Ulu Hoi-Laukapu Hilo 18 F 0 18 0 ❑ 4 Hilo MaileTerrace Hilo 24 F 0 0 18 6 0 Hilo Val Hala Hilo 103 F 0 32 71 0 0 Lanakila Homes Hilo 190 F 4 16 78 82 14 Lincoln Courtside Hilo 36 F 0 0 36 ❑ 0 RiversideApts Hilo 74 F 0 12 56 6 4 KauhaleO'Hanakahi Hilo 20 F(PH) Punahele Homes Hilo 30 F(PH) 0 0 30 0 0 Total 1,001 30 474 325 124 23 3.0% 47.4% 32.9% 1.2.495 2.3% Total Elderly 380 30 349 0 0 0 Total Family 621 4 125 329 124 23 SECONDARY TRADE AREA Lokahi Ka'u Honokaa 40 E 24 16 0 0 0 Kulaimano Elderly Hsg Pepeekeo 50 E 0 54 0 0 4 KauhaleOlu Pepeekeo 124 F 0 73 26 26 0 Weinberg Kea'au Elderly Keeau 20 E 0 19 1 ❑ 0 HaleAloha O Puna Keeau 30 E(PH) 18 12 0 0 0 Total 264 42 170 27 26 0 15.9% 64.4% 10.2% 9.8% 0.070 Total Elderly 140 42 97 1 0 0 Total Family 124 0 73 26 26 0 TOTAL 1,265 72 644 356 I50 23 5.7% 50.9% 28.1% 11.9% 1.8% Coffiers SUMMARY OF • Target Households Colliers used the 202 Hawaii County HUD income guidelines for housing to assess which households could be considered renters versus homeowners. based on an area median income ("AMI") of $75,200, a household with 100%AMI can afford to pay about $1,752 per month in housing expense which is egjivalent to a mortgage payment (plus property taxes, insurance, and maintenance fees) for a $228,000 home with a 5%down payment and a 3.0% interest rate. The median condo price for South Hilo was $169,000 as of November 2020. This price can fluctuate due to limited inventory being sold. Households with incomes of 70% of AMI and higher would be able to affo-d a home at this price. In general, households with incomes below this threshold would be considered renters. However, one of the hurdles to home ownership among island residents is the large down payment needed for Hawaii's high cost housing market. Thus, households in this income bracket and higher could also be considered in the rental pool. The target households with AMI belcw 60% would be conside,ed renters. There are approximately 6,350 households in the primary trade area in this category and an additional 1,530 in the secondary trade area. An analysis of the senior/elderly population is provided on the next page. TRADE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY Percent of HUD AM Income .11 $22,600to$45,100 $45,100to$61Dt200 $60,200to$75,zoo Households(2020) Primary 3,365 2,985 1,709 1,770 6,350 Secondary 944 586 348 358 1,530 Total 4,308 3,572 2,057 2,129 7,880 Affordable Rent Guidelines(2020 Monthly Rents including utilities) OBR $438 $438 to$876 $87£to$1,168 $1,168 to$1,460 $438 to$876 IBR $469 $469 to$938 $938 to$1,251 $1,251 to$1,563 $469 to$938 2BR $562 $562 to$1,125 $1,125 to$1,500 $1,500 to$1,875 $562 to$1,125 3BR $649 $649 to$1,299 $1,299 to$1,733 $1,733 to$2,156 $649 to$1,299 Max Monthly Rent 30% of monthly income $565 1 $565 to$1,128 $1,128 to$1,505 $1,505 to$1,880 Max Home Purchase Price(1) Hilo Median Condo Price(November 2020f(3}:.$169,000 30%of monthly income $141K to$228K $128K to$314K (1)Based on a 30-year mortgage with a 3.00%interest rate,with 301 of gross hcdsehdd income available for payme-a of morlgage principal,irReresL maintenance fees.real prcperty tax and inc5uraw--. [2]Souse:Title Guaranty Hawaii SUMMARYColers OFFINDINGS INTERNATIONAL SENIOR HOUSING Utilizing census data for household income categories by age (over 65 years), there is an estimated 1,361 elderly renter households in the primary trade areas with an additional 200 in the secondary market. By median household income, there are about 1,222 households with incomes equal to less than 60%AMI in the primary trade area, plus 520 in the secondary trade area. ELDERLY POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS TradeArea PRIMARY SECONDARY TOTAL Total 60 and over(2020) 11,705 2.068 13,773 60-64 3,210 3,210 65-74 6,390 1325 7,715 75-84 3,443 380 3,823 85 and older 1,872 363 2,235 RENTER-OCCUPIED Total 1,361 200 1,561 1-person household 895 121 1,016 2-or-more-person household 466 79 545 o - Total 1,222 520 1,742 Less than$25,000 202 329 531 $25,000 to$44,999 1,020 1 191 1,211 (1)Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Census Summary File 1.Esri current And 5 year forecasts. (2) I I..S.r.emut Rrirpno(2nl';-Ml Q7 . Amprimn rhrnrminity.Sijnmy S-ypnrpsYimntpe.RPtriavwrf fmm chttps:11censusreporter.orgy Colers SUMMARY OF FINDINGS INTERNATIONAL MARKET DEMAND After accounting for existing rental inventory and vacancies, it is evident that there is existing/pent-up demand for rental housing in the trade areas. For the primary trade area, there appears to be a a residual demand for households with less than 60% AMI of 5,349 units after accounting for the affordable housing inventor units. For the secondary trade area, there appears to be an additional shortage of 1,266 units to serve renters. Senior/Elderly demand accounts for an estimated 842 of these units in the primary trade area. Although there is a shortage of units in the trade area, it is not reasonable to assume that the Property would capture all of this demand as residents could be housed in multi-family scenarios or other Section 8 housing. Thus, we have assumed the site can capture a certain amount(capture rate) of this demand. We have assumed rather conservative capture rates considering the systemic shortage of affordable housing throughout the Big Island and the state. Based on our analysis, the total potential demand for Hale Ola O Mohouli i5 between 280 to 573 units for the primary and secondary trade areas. Of these units, the potential demand for senior housing is between 45 and 92 units. PROJECTED MARKET DEMAND TOTALBelow 60%ARM Elderly PRIMARY MARKET Households(Demand) 6,350 1,222 Existing Family Housing Units 621 Existing Elderly Units 380 380 Planned Inventory Units(2021-2023) 0 ❑ Residual Demand(HH) 5,349 842 Project Capture Rate 5.0°/0 267 42 7.0% 374 59 10.0% 535 84 SECONDARY MARKET Households(Demand) 1,530 520 Existing FamilyHousiIng Units 0 0 Existing Elderly Units 264 254 Planned Inventory Units(2021-2023) 0 0 Residual Demand(HH) 1,266 256 Project Capture Rate 1.09'0 13 3 2.0°/a 25 5 1W.1 38 8 -TOTAL ■ :1 to 573 45 to 92 (1y Householders 65 years and older with incomes less than$45,000. (2) U.S.Census Bureau(2015-2019f. American Community Surwy5-yearestimates. Retrieved from<https://censusreporter.orgn HAWAII ISLAND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION tA 100 PAUAHI STREET, SUITE 204 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 q- �a �o a� C To: Planning Department =Q Attn: Tracie-Lee Camero a z From: Keith Kato A Executive Director Date: November 13, 2020 Subject: TIAR—Hale Ola O Mohouli SLU Boundary Amendment Request Tax Map Key: 2-4-1: 168 Enclosed are 21 copies of the Traffic Impact Report for the Hale Ola O Mohouli affordable housing project. Please let us know if anything further is required. Planning Dep'.. Exhibit_ 4 13 ( r4 A &I AN EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY -EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER- ADMINISTRATION: (808)969-1158 FAX(808)935-6916 .. 0-4 Transportation Impact Assessment Report CO r Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residentim"" Hilo, November _ �Wals�a'�u�'W'aisiakil A ECOM Technical Services,Inc. AZC �{aula'�n�i<vi Island • s ,1� �v�onut island y � •�i:�� ��� • �r-`!►_�- • lig ? Hilo�Hiio if•,, ?�=Y� � • ' Reeds Island � ' _ • �� ',\ ,rte '_, _ � � ...��*} til 4•..r•, .`Pf ..�.c� `� .� �O�I-i-ZC1 • �� ti'•ys.•L f ~rte." `�1°:i `~ -L;,_ �, _ i her. `t, ? 1 �o- r.:• �+�• tAt -�•p„,.� ��i r Honolulu,Hawai'i 96813 Ph.(808)521-5031 Project Reference: 60644974 Transportation Impact Assessment Rep❑rt Hale Ola ❑ M❑houli Affordable Residential Development Hilo, Hawaii November 2020 Prepared for Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 204 Hiio, Hawaii 96720 [808] 987-6750 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 1001 Bishop Street, Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 (808) 521-5031 Project Reference 60644974 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessmert Report Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS...-.................... ..- ...... .......,....................................2 2.1 Site Description...__..........................................................................................2 2.2 Roadway Conditions ...............................................•----.....-- ..............3 2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions ................................................. .....3 2,2.2 Intersection Conditions............. 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions....................................................................9 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities..............•.,,.......... ............................... ....9 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities.........................................................................................9 2.4 Public Transit Conditions............... .................................... ..--..--..--.. . ....10 2.5 Transportation Conditions................................................... ......--........__11 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and Adjustment..................................................11 2.5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes.................................................13 2.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations...............................................................13 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS-.....................................................................................15 3.1 Proposed Development....................................................-......_......-................15 3.2 Future Roadway Conditions...................................................-..........---..--.......15 3.2.1 Roadways ...............................................15 3.2.2 Intersections................................................................ ....------.......----15 3.3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions...............................15 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities-.................................. _..........................................15 3.3.2 Bicycle Facilities............................................•...........-. ...-.......----15 3.3.3 Public Transit...................................................... .-- .............-..............15 3.4 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Background Traffic .......................................16 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth ............ ................. .............. ..............................16 3.4.2 Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center......................17 3.5 Vehicular Trips Generated by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development .............................................................................................................19 3.6 Projected Year 2025 Traffic Volumes..............................................................20 3.6.1 Hale Ola O Mohouli Trip Distribution and Assignment..............................20 A=COM i November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.6-2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.................................. .20 3.8 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations ................................23 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS...........................................................24 4.1 Summary......... ................. .......... .................................................... .....24 4.2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place............................... ... 24 4-3 Recommendations .......................................................................................26 5.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................................. ... 27 List of Figures Figure 1 Project Site Location .......-........................ .............................................1 Figure 2 Hale Ola O Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan........................................................2 Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street........................... ......3 Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street .....................................4 Figure 5 Komohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North................................--.-........5 Figure 6 Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North.................................6 Figure7 Kupuna Place .................................................................. ................................6 Figure 8 Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place Intersection.........................................................7 Figure 9 Mohouli Street/Komohana Street Intersection ...................................................8 Figure 10 Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersection.......................................................9 Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route........................................10 Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 12 Figure 13 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peals Hour Background Traffic Volumes ..-18 Figure 14 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peak Hour Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Generated TrafficVolumes.............................................................................................................21 Figure 15 Projected Year 2025 AM and PM Peale Hour Total Traffic Volumes ..............22 Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection....25 Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mchouii/Kupuna Intersection.....25 List of Tables Table 1 Adjusted Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Operations....................... 14 Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes................... .........--........ ............. 16 Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development... . ..... ....... ........ . ..................................... . 19 Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary................................ ....................--.......--....................................- 23 A=COM ii November 2020 Hale Ola C Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation is proposing to expand the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo, Hawaii. Hale Ola O Mohouli will add up to 90 affordable residential uses. The existing Mohouli Senior Residences has 184 residential units and at Adukt Day Care Center. The proposed development site is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. Figure 1 illustrates the project location. This transportation impact analysis report (TIAR)documents existing transportation conditions, projects future conditions in the vicinity of the proposed development with and without the proposed housing development and assesses the transportation impacts of the proposed action. It summarizes the transportation issues identified and proposes recommendations to address those issues. ti ri r Mo i. 1 cr 0 '00 Figure 1 Project Site Location A-�M 1 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation impact Assessment Report 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2A Site Description The proposed Hale Ola D Mohouli affordable residential development will be on parcel TMK (3) 2-4-001:168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The currently vacant site is located between existing single-family residential development on Kukuau Street and the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place- Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and will also provide access for the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center- The Hale Ola C Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawai'i Fire Department Dispatch Center site- A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2. i Future „� County of Hawaii ' Proposed Hale Cala O Mohouli fir Department Existing Mohor,li Affordable Housing Expansion ispa Center Senior Residences Proposed �--�,,- _Drive .g. � -� • -2- Mohou Street -•--- Figure 2 Hale Ola O Mohouli Conceptual Site Plan ASCI M 2 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.2 Roadway Conditions Key roadways in this study are Mohouli Street. Komohana Street, Kukuau Street. and Kupuna Place. 2.2.1 Roadway Descriptions MOhcxili 5tl'CYt Mohouli Street provides mauka to makai access between Kaumana Drive and Kilauea Street- The older portion of the roadway, makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour [mph]. The roadway was extended mauka from Komohana Street to the Kaumana Drive/Ainako Avenue intersection in 2402. The newer section of roadway has wide paved shoulders that could be used to widen Mohouli Street to four lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 mph. The lands adjoining this section of roadway are currently mostly vacant- The new section of roadway provides residents of Kaumana Drive and Ainako Avenue with an alternate access route to the south and west sections of Hilo. Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the newer segment of Mohouli Street in the vicinity of the Kupuna Place access to the existing Mohouli Senior Residences. . 1 Figure 3 Mohouli Street Looking Makai Toward Komohana Street A=COM 3 November 2020 Hale Dia 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report v:1 .: } Figure 4 Mohouli Street Looking Mauka Toward Kukuau Street Komohana Street Komohana Street runs in a general north to south direction between Waianuenue Avenue and Ainaola Drive. The portion of roadway south of Puainako Street generally passes through residential areas while the northern section adjoins vacant lands. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Komohana Street serves as a commuter route for residents in the south and west sections of Hilo to reach downtown Hilo, Hilo Hospital, and Hilo High School. Figure 5 illustrates Komohana Street at Mohouli Street looking north. ►Gcw 4 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report _ z Figure 5 Korrohana Street at Mohouli Street Looking North Kukuau Street Kukuau Street is a two-lane County minor collector road. The older roadway section. makai of Komohana Street, runs through a residential neighborhood and intersects with Kapi'olani Street. The newer roadway, mauka of Komohana Street, provides access to a mauka residential subdivision. The extension of Mohouli Street created a new intersection on this roadway. The posted speed limit on Kukuau Street is 35 mph in the vicinity of Mohouli Street. Figure 6 shows Kukuau Street at Mohouli Street looking north- J4-CUM 5 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report ti •r _ Figure B Kukuau Street Approach to Mohouli Street Looking North Kupuna Place Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences Figure 7 shows Kupuna Place at its intersection with Mohouli Street. Figure 7 Kupuna Place AECUM 6 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.2,2 Intersection Conditions Traffic data was collected at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection and updated at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections. Mohouli Street Ku Una flare Kupuna Place intersects Mohouli Street at an unsignalized "T"-intersection with STOP- sign control on the Kupuna Place leg of the intersection. The Kupuna Place approach is configured with a single lane, although there is sufficient width so that right-tuming and left-turning vehicles can move concurrently. There is a refuge in the painted Mohouli Street median for vehicles turning left out of Kupuna Place onto Mohouli Street. The eastbound Mohouli Street approach is a single-lane approach with a median left- turn lane for traffic turning int Kupuna Place. The westbound Mohouli Street approach is configured with a through lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. There are no crosswalks across the approaches to this intersection. Figure 8 is a photograph of the Kupuna Place approach to the intersection. h. r Figure 8 Mohouli StreetJKupuna Place Intersection Mohouli Street/Korn ohana Street The Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection is a four-legged, signalized intersection located east of the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Figure 9 shows the intersection configuration. AE CW 7 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Mohouli w Figure 9 Mohouli Street/Komohana Street Intersection All intersection approaches are configured with a single through lane and exclusive left- turn lanes. The eastbound Mohouli Street and northbound Komohana Street approaches also have exclusive right-turn lanes. The westbound Mohouli Street and southbound Komohana Street approaches have shared through/right-turn lanes. The westbound, southbound, and northbound approaches have protected/permissive left-turn turn signal phasing, while the eastbound approach has protected left-turn signal phasing. There are crosswalks and pedestrian signals on all intersection approaches. Mohouli 5treeUKLikuau Street The Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersection is a four-legged, unsignalized intersection with a STOP-sign control on the Kukuau Street intersection approaches. Figure 10 shows the intersection configuration. Both Mohouli Street approaches are configured with exclusive left-turn lanes and shared through/right-turn lanes. The Kukuau Street approaches are configured a shared left- through-right lanes, although there are wide, paved shoulders that would allow right- turning vehicles to bypass vehicles waiting to turn left or proceed straight through the intersection. There are crosswalks across all approaches of the intersection. ►4=com 8 November 2020 Hale ❑la Q Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report ti. Moh0 �[Ipgll/!I r Ln ru 73 Figure 10 Mohouli StreeVKukuau Street Intersection 2.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Conditions 2.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities The intersections on Mohouli Street at Komohana Street and Kukuau Street have crosswalks across all approaches. The Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection does not have crosswalks. There are no sidewalks along Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. There are wide, paved shoulders and it was observed that they are used by pedestrians as sidewalks. There are sidewalks along the internal roadways within the Mohouli Senior Residences, including on Kupuna Place. 2.3.2 Bicycle Facilities There are no designated bicycle facilities along Mohouli Street, Komohana Street. or Kukuau Street in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli site. However, as noted previously, the roadways in the area have wide, paved shoulders that are utilized by bicyclists as well as pedestrians. A COM 9 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.4 P«k31ic Transit Conditiions The public transit service on the island of Hawaii is provided by the County s Hele-On Bus system. Figure 11 illustrates the closest existing transit service routes in the vicinity of the Hale Ofa O Mohouli site. At this time, the site is not served by fixed transit routes. It was observed that the senior daycare located within the existing Mohouli Senior Residences provides shuttle bus service to some of its participants. N11 VEIIIIIIIII 1r,hart. H A Rad it�,nd ASW i•i' . .i wP till � S• llnt sr Hale fila 0 Mohouli Site Y P4�\A• •' E /l[l1 Figure 11 Hele-On Bus Route for Intra-Hilo Kaumana Route AZECUM 10 November 2020 Hale Ola D Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2.5 Transportation Conditions 2.5.1 Volume Data Collection and AdIwitment Due potentially atypical conditions due to COVID-19 related restrictions, alternative methods for establishing base condition traffic volumes were used. Base traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street and the Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections were obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis Report for Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Mohouli Hei hts Senior Neighborhood Project, September 2011. Vehicular turning movement, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were conducted at the Mohouli StreetlKupuna Place intersection. These counts were conducted for the AM and PM peak periods on Tuesday, October 20, 2020 and Wednesday. October 21, 2020 from 6:00 AM to 8:30 AM for the AM peak period and 315 PM to 5:30 PM for the PM peak period. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) link traffic volumes on Mohouli Street and on Komohana Street for years 2016; 2017. 2018, and 2019 were obtained and used to adjust the traffic turning movement counts to an estimate of what the base traffic volumes would be without the effects of COVID-19. These HDOT counts were also used to help estimate future ambient traffic growth rates. Figure 12 summarizes the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour traffic turning movement volumes at the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street. the Mohouli StreetlKupuna Place, and the Mohouli StreetlKukuau Street intersections. The weekday AM peak hour was estimated to occur from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour was determined to occur from 3:15 PM to 4:15 PM. The traffic count summary sheets from the 2011 study, the recently counted Mohouli StreetlKupuna Place intersection, and the HDOT counts are included in Appendix A. A—MMM 11 November 2020 Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report o°� R s+ �o �v :E uP'me ►�t K W on 1 Evl � M � p Y U. p, �27 10aC 9 ys a O w a L 0. ��i4fiti �6111 T a 9 n �lny� o d � o o ' w ❑ H � U � i az Figure 12 Adjusted Year 2020 AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ►4_CUM 12 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 2,5.2 Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Volumes Low pedestrian and bicycle volumes were observed. Both the pedestrian and bicyclists were observed using the paved shoulders on Mohouli Street. During the AM peak hour 1 bicycle and 7 pedestrians were observed. Most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. During the PM peak hour 1 bicycle and 0 pedestrians were observed. A greater number of pedestrians were observed later with the largest number, 13, occurring from 4:30 PM to 5.30 PM. As in the AM peak hour, most of the pedestrians observed appeared to be walking for exercise or were walking a pet. The pedestrian and bicycle counts are included in Appendix A with the traffic count summary sheets. There are separate worksheets for the pedestrian and bicycle counts. ''.5.3 Existing Intersection Operations The three intersections were analyzed using the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour turning movement volumes and existing intersection configurations. Table 1 summarizes the calculated intersection delay and level of service(LOS)for the weekday AM and PM commuter peak hour time periods. The intersections were analyzed using the unsignalized intersection capacity methods described in the Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition �IHCM] through the SynchroJSmTraffic software. The Synchro analysis worksheets are included in Appendix B. As shown in Table 1, the key turning movements at each intersection operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) for peak hour conditions. The left-turn movement from Kupuna Place to eastbound Mohouli Street reflects analyses conducted assuming a vehicle having to execute the turn in one maneuver. As noted previously, there is a median left-turn refuge area that allows vehicles to complete the left-turn maneuver in a two-step process. making the left-turn movement much easier. Assuming that vehicles must complete the left-turn in one maneuver results in a conservatively high delay. LOS for unsignalized intersections is a qualitative index based on a quantitative performance measure such as intersection delay to express the relative level of trafric operations. Definitions of LOS are included in Appendix C. ASOM 13 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Table 1 Adjusted Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection Operations AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour IntersectionlMovement Lela LOS Delay LOS Mohouli/Kukuau EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A W13 Mohouli LT 8.5 A 8.0 A NB Kukuau Combined 20.4 C 14.8 B SB Kukuau Combined 12.3 B 15.3 C MohouliJKu una EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 8.7 A SB Kupuna LT 18.1 C 18.7 C SB Kupuna RT 9.8 A 11,0 ri Mohouli)Komohana 33.6 C 71 36.6 D Notes:Delay is secondslvehicle Analyses performed using Synchro Version 11 and summarized consistent with HCK 61h Edition,earameters A=c 14 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.0 FUTURE CONDITIONS 3.1 Proposed Developinent The proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development proposes up to 90 affordable residential units on parcel T M K(3) 2-4-00'�168 located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. A conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2 of this report. Access to the site is proposed via a right-in/right-out driveway with direct access to Mohouli Street and via a driveway that would connect to existing Kupuna Place. Kupuna Place provides access to Mohouli Street for the existing Mohouli Senior Residences and wiIf also provide access for the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center. The Hale Dia O Mohouli driveway will connect to Kupuna Place via an easement that crosses the future County of Hawai'i Fire Department Dispatch Center site. Assumed project time frame is five years in the future. 3.2 Future Roadway Conditions 3.2.1 Roadways No changes to Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, Kupuna Place, or Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. Mohouli Street, in the vicinity of the proposed project, has wide paved shoulders that would enable widening in the future if justified by background traffic growth. 3.2.2 Intersections No changes to the existing intersections of Mohouli Street/Komohana Street, Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place, or Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street are anticipated within the time frame of this study. 3.3 Future Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Public Transit Conditions 3.3.1 Pedestrian Facilities No changes to the existing pedestrian facilities at the locations evaluated in this study are assumed. 3.3.2 Bicycle Facilities As noted previously, bicyclists traveling along Mohouli Street either share the road with vehicular traffic or use the wide paved shoulders. No changes are assumed for within the time frame of this study. 3.3.3 Public Transit Hele-On bus routes documented in the existing conditions section of this report are assumed to remain the same within the time frame of this evaluation. ►E-Mm �15 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.4 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Background Traffic Background traffic refers to traffic unrelated to the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli affordable housing development. Background traffic was projected for Year 2025 conditions based on an assumed five-year time frame for the proposed development- There are two main components to the background traffic volumes: • growth in traffic on Mohouli Street, Komohana Street, and Kukuau Street-, • traffic generated by the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center- 3.4.1 Ambient Traffic Growth Table 2 compares peak hour traffic volumes counted from 2007 to 2020 at the intersections evaluated in this study. As shown, traffic volumes have remained relatively consistent over the past 10 plus years on Mohouli Street and Komohana Street- With the exception of the 2020 counts, the traffic volume data are pre-COV ID-19- Table 2 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour RoadwaySeciment Eastbound Westbound Total Eastbound Westbound Total Mohouli Kukuau-Kupuna 498 290 788 272 545 817 2007 count Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 558 325 893 322 485 807 2009 count) Mohouli:Kukuau-Kupuna 495 242 737 315 457 772 2020 count Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 470 245 715 NO 527 817 2007 count Mohouli-Kupuna- KoMohana 535 255 790 300 485 785 2009 count Mohouli:Kupuna- Komohana 516 261 777 345 482 827 2020 count Northbc-und Southbound Total Northbound Southbound Total Komohana South of Mohouli 1,215 430 1,645 605 890 1,495 2007 count Komohana:South of Mohouli 1135 455 1,590 615 930 1545 (2009 count) Komohana:South of Mohouli 1,102 435 1,537 618 867 1,485 {2019 HDOT} F te:AM Peak Hour:7:00 AM-8:00 AM PM Peak Hour:4:00• 5:00 PM(varies slightly) Counts 2007,2009,and 2019 are prior to COVID-19 conditions Based on the historic traffic data, it is judged that current background traffic growth will be based on new projects occurring in the vicinity of the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Q=OM 16 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report affordable residential project- Many large projects were previously expected to occur by 2020 but have not. If they do proceed. an update of their entitlements will likely be needed. Therefore, growth in the year 2025 peak hour forecast of traffic at the intersections evaluated In this study is based on likely projects that will occur in the immediate vicinity of the Hale Ola O Mohouli project. A project that meets that criterion is the future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center located on the parcel adjacent to the Hale Ola O Mohouli project. Traffic from the Fire Dispatch project will be added to the adjusted existing year 2020 traffic to forecast the year 2025 background traffic. -) -' Future County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center Forecast of traffic generated by the County of Hawaii Fire Department Dispatch Center was obtained from a previous study entitled Traffic Impact Analysis Report, County of Hawaii Fire Administration Support Complex, February 2008. This is considered a conservatively high estimate of traffic generated as the land use assumed in the report contained more than just a dispatch center. Figure 13 illustrates the projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movement volumes for the background traffic. A=COM 17 November 2020 Hale O§ O UohodlAffordable Reside%%IDevelopment Transportation Im pad Assessment Report t � ■ $k + � � � 2 LU ¥ �� o �0W > # s ��5 k ' ap Z ! .�I1 2Gy ■ § 2 ■ o ■ U 2�2a « LO m � 0 2 � 2 } � z�< 2$, ■ � ��1 a 2 / + = % w LLJ } £ 0 E - « LLJM � Cx * � M w � \ 5 04 ® = ] ¥a = epe13Rrec dY ar2025AM and PMPea kHou rBackground TmmcVol u m �� 18 November 2020 Hale Ola D Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.5 Vehicular Trips Generated by Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Table 3 summarizes the land use and estimated vehicular volumes that would be generated by the proposed Hale Ola Q Mohouli development. The vehicular volume is based on the trip generation rates documented in the Institute of Transportation (ITE) publication, Trip Generation 10`h Edition. Equations for AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic was used in this calculation. The trip generation equations for Category 210 (Apartment) was used to estimate the vehicular traffic generated by the site. The index used as a predictor was the maximum number of dwelling units proposed- Ta ble roposed.Table 3 Projected Trip Generation by Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Land Use Intensity ITE AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Category In Out In Out Multi-family Residential 90❑.tJ. 210 10 38 44 24 Notes:AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are in vehicles per hour. Trip Generation is the estimation of vehicular traffic based on equations documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication,TripGeneration, 10th Edition, For Category 220-Apartment,the trip generation equation s are: AM:T=0.49(X) +3.73 (20%Entering/80%Exiting) PM:T= 0.55 (X)+ 17.65(65% Entering/35%Exiting) where T-traffic volumes(veh Iles per hour), X=dweliir:g units DM, - dwelling units Q=COM 19 November 2020 Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.6 Projected Year 2025 Traffic Volurzies 3.6.1 Hale Ula ❑ Mohouli Trip Distribution and Assignment The projected Year 2025 vehicular volumes generated by the Hale Ola O Mohouli project summarized in Table 3 were directionally distributed and assigned to the roadway network. The directional distribution of turns onto and from Mohouli Street was based on the traffic turning movement conducted October 20-21, 2020. Turning movements at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street and Mohouli Street/Kukuau Street intersections utilized the turning movement patterns in the adjusted existing turning movements. The resulting projected Year 2025 traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development are summarized in Figure 14. 3.6.2 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The projected traffic volumes generated by the proposed Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli development summarized in figure x were combined with the projected Year 2025 background traffic summarized in Figure y to obtain the total Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes. The total projected Year 2025 peak hour traffic volumes are summarized in Figure 15, A:COM 20 November 2020 Hale Ola O MohodhAffordable Residential Delopment Transportation Impad Assessment Report � § 4 66© w ■ / + 0 ® > + u LL � & R 0 «I} ,PA� UJ ¥� oil 0 t f § |2, \ S 1 i7{!| 0 - ■ « � �> � o�c 0 4 f 7 ƒJ � � �j R � I \ / § £ �� ■ « � 2 « � ) « Na / k� ■ - ® ® � % { � 2 LU2 g ` UJ \ ■ 0 2 EL 2 Figure 14 Projected Year 202&m and P%Peak Hmr Hale 9a0 Mohm§Ge Generated Traffic Volumes �Ecvm 21 November 2020 Hie Ola O mohoQiAffordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Ass s mer! Report § � K / 49, + � � � ■ � ®� \d' & « UJ r ; 1%S § 2 + �r TL §J=! |■ !u, §; ■ �= r \0 o «� 0 �J, z�< _ 2 ■ k �q a $ « ■ � § 0 - I- k . & w ® J2 § N � % d ) Figure lsProjected Y a20 25 AM and PM.Peak Hoy ToallTraffic Vol mom AECUM 22 November 2020 Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 3.8 Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations The projected Year 2025 AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes with and without the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development were used to evaluate future intersection operations. The signalized and unsignalized HCM 611 Edition methods as implemented by the Synchro analysis software was used. Table 4 summarizes the results of the existing 2420, year 2025 without project, and year 2025 with project intersection analyses for AM and PM peak hour conditions. Table 4 Year 2020 and Projected Year 2025 Peak Hour Intersection Operations Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 2025 wlo 2025 2025 w1a 2025 Intersection/MovementExistin Project _W/Project Existin Pro'ect w1Pro'ect ❑ela L05 Dela LOS Dela LOS Dela LOS Dela LOS Dela LOS MohoulifKukuau EB Wohouli LT 7.9 A 7.9 A 7.9 A 8-3 A 8.3 A 8.3 A WB Mohouli LT 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.5 A 8.0 A 8.1 A 8.1 A NB Kukuau Combined 20.4 C 20.6 C 20.9 C 14.8 B 14.9 B 15.0 C SH Kukuau Combined 12.3 B 12.4 B 12.5 B 15.3 C 154 C 15.5 C Hale Ola 0 Mohouli RURO SB RI/RO RT na na na na 9-9 A na na na na 11.4 B MohoullIKu una EB Mohouli LT 7.9 A 8-1 A 8.1 A 8.7 A 8-7 A 8.8 A SB Kupuna LT 18.1 C 18.7 C 29.1 C 18-7 C 22.1 C 26.6 D SB Kupuna RT 9.8 A 9.8 A 9.9 A 11.0 B 11.7 B 12.1 B MohoulifKomohana 33-6 C 33-7 C 38.6 ❑ 36-6 ❑ 36.8 D 38.6 D Notes Delay is in seconds/vehicle Analyses performed using Synchro Version 11 and summaraed consistent with HCM 6th Edition parameters na=not applicable As shown, the Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli affordable residential development has relatively small traffic impacts at the intersections evaluated. The added traffic does contribute to a slight increase in overall intersection delay at the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection, and because the overall intersection delay due to current and projected background traffic volumes at this intersection are near the threshold for LOS C, the slight increase in delay moves this intersection to LOS D, usually considered acceptable to urban peak hour conditions. A=CUM 23 November 2020 Hale Dia O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 4.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Summary The proposed Hale Ola 0 Mohouli development is a proposed affordable residential development that expands the existing Mohouli Senior Residences in Hilo It will contain up to 90 multi-family residential units and is located on Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street. The proposed Hale Ola ❑ Mohouli development is projected to generate 48 vehicles per hour (vph) during the AM peak hour with 10 vph inbound and 38 vph outbound. In the PM peak hour. it is expected to generate 58 vph with 44 vph inbound and 24 vph outbound. The additional traffic generated by the proposed Hale pia O Mohouli development 1s forecasted to have minor impacts on intersection operations at the intersections in the vicinity of the proposed development. A proposed driveway with traffic movements restricted to right-inlright-out movements will be effective in reducing traffic activity on Kupuna Place. The existing roadway infrastructure would be able to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli development- 4.2 Evaluation of Traffic Signal Warrants at Kupuna Place The projected Year 2025 peak hour turning movements were used to evaluate the need for a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection. Currently, this intersection operates as a two-way STOP-sign controlled intersection with the STOP- sign on the Kupuna Place approach. Figure 16 and Figure 17 show graphic evaluations of the peak hour traffic signal warrant as documented in the Manual on Uniform Control Devices MUTCD), 2009 as revised, for the projected year 2025 AM peak hour and the 2025 PM peak hour time periods.. As shown, in Figure 17, the projected year 2025 PM peak hour volumes are closer to warranting a traffic signal at the Mohouli Street/Kupuna Place intersection than the projected year 2025 AM peak hour volume. Even for the projected year 2025 PM peak hour. the peak hour traffic signal warrant in not satisfied. The projected year 2025 PM peak hour traffic on Mohouli Street is 910 vehicles per hour. To satisfy the peak hour traffic warrant, this volume would need to increase to approximately 1,000 vehicles per hour, a 10 percent increase. Given the fairly stable traffic volume level on Mohouli Street between year 2007 and year 2020, it is anticipated that this 10 percent Increase would require growth over a substantial number of years or would be caused by a dramatic increase in development in the vicinity of the intersection. A.EXIM I 24 November 2020 Hale Ola 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report Year 2025 AM Peak Flour FFgure 4C-4. Warrant 3.Peak Hour(70%Factory (COMMIUNfTY LESS THAN 14.000 POPULATION OR A9OYE 40 MIPH ON UAJOR STREETi app Y OR MORE LANES d 2 OR MORE LANES MINOR + I STREET Soo 2 OR MORE LANES R 1 LANE HIGHER- 1 LANE A 1 LANE VOLUME APPROACH- 200 VPH fob 7-1 100• 75' 300 4001 500 am 700 800 800 1000 110D 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-- VEHICLES PER HOUR(VPH) 'hWle-100 vprF applies as the lower mreshoid vaa rw for a minor-sweet aMroach with two or mote tants and 75 von applies as"kriver theaShokl volume for a maw-sheet approach wnh one Sane. Figure 16 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Moh4ulilKupuna)ntersection Year 2025 PM Peak Hour Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) I � FT 1 400 2 OR MORE LAMES m2 OR MORE LANES MINORZ QR MORE LANES 8 t I STREET 300 I NE HIGHER- T LANE&1 LANE VOLUME APPROACH- 200 VPH 100 100' 7s• 3W 400 500 800 700 BOO 900 IODO 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-- VEHICLES PER HOUR(VPHy 'Nate,104 vph applies as the lower threshold volume lot a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Figure 17 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant-Mohouli/Kupuna Intersection A C M 25 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 4.3 Recommendations The following improvements are recommended for the proposed Hale Dla O Mohouli development: • Implement the proposed right-in/right-out driveway on Mohouli Street. As part of the implementation, restripe part of the wide paved shoulder on westbound Mohouli Street as a right-turn only lane into the Hale Ola O Mohouli development; • Assure that future major development occurring in the area with traffic impacts to the segment of Mohouli Street between Komohana Street and Kukuau Street provide an evaluation of traffic signal warrant for the Mohouli StreeUKupuna Place intersection. �[W 26 November 2020 Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment Report 5.0 REFERENCES Hawai'i Island Hele-On Bus- Hale-On - A Service of the County of Hawai'i Mass Transit Agency. (2020). Retrieved from http:llwww.heleonbus.org/ Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012- "210 Single Family Detached Housing." in Trip Generation Manual 1(r Edition, Volume 2: Data 297-298. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2012. "230 Residential Condominium/Townhouse." In Tnp Generation Manual 91" Edition, Volume 2: Data 395-396. Washington DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Transportation Research Board of the National Academics. 2010. "Urban Street Facilities." In Highway Capacity Manual 2010, 3:16-1-16-47. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. United States Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 2009- 'AC. Traffic Control Signal Needs Studies." In Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 40.03 439-441. Washington DC Federal Highway Administration �Ucw 27 November 2020 Appendix A Traffic Count Data Raw Vehicle Turning Movement Traffic Count Worksheets 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 0 4 4 a N ro m IL Q Q r o7 N Q N rp F � N �3 p E arnr4am civ v rn Y 2 vu3m - T �v rnm cov 2 r m a a a d d o 0 0 0 Q Q a a d a d o 0 0 0 o a w n m a Q O Q Q Q 4 4 4 4 4 Q L � a -a a ¢ o z u) aD E d o o Q o o Q Q Q 4 Q n D 2 Y Y LL L N CL C Q 4 4 4 0 0 Q d d d O Q L 7 Q^ cm cli L ❑ o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �I w to '� � a Q ❑ O Q Q 4 4 4 a O d 0 O F � q V] y J L ❑ �lLl 3 M Q DO N Ln en cc cm Q O H L 7 "a W N C LJ V r [•7 C1 LO [•1 D M Q] Ql UA N C (n E L 0] co 2 E C-) m U ❑ N Q Q O Q Q a Q O a d O r 0. = c v o 'S' E vi 0 a c7 m x a) P- n CD p- = a� U a' a �J Y � in 4 ¢ o U - E a a d o c o Q Q o 0 0 � LL 0. H N 0 0 cn V U li21 tlJ O7 07 6] r CV C7o N d O r N m r v E c0 D C C C C = E E E E D7 �G Ya E E E ' L=L U7 U [J U U m a Q u� CD C. Cl to Qin �A co [p to N M1 N n m oa O Q Q Q a a a O d d 7- d Q p a a p p p p v O u7 Q1 v 0 0 0 n a a a p 0 a � S- yp J _ m 7 E O O v r r O O O r r r 2 ❑ LL L a a a O a a a a p o p L p Q Q p p p p p v v p N a m a a a o 0 0 o n Q o 0 J � J ¢a � Z � o o n a o a o 0 0 0 0 jr- Y d Q L ❑ 0 Q o p o p o p a o o p I � A `1 o a o Cl o a o c o 0 0 F � D to 1 ❑ D LU o E p p p v p p O O v v O ❑ ml LL 2 ❑ w C r U CL ❑ v ❑ 'd ���77 m C C h � U v O O v n 7 a a O p a rC U t6 � U 0] O QY w }r a a Q p a p a Q p 4 Cl vN M� o � v E a C 0ooooQo 0 p c C C 0 0] a�J '� < ❑ rn O Q Q t.] V ooa�Opppoa O � NOO V =1 Le L2 p O g N t 6] L ~ L7 Lp0 ❑ L] U] H 41 N tl] a r N M Opp 4 p p p p v O p rC f0 E 4 C C C C cmU -- z = fl] E E E E C7 M M LL U] [n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ j U U U 0 m _¢ h 2i x a - ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ QQQ Q o°CD iCD 10 p �t7 p u7 p �t7 0 1Ci o u7 d 4 M p r c] tt y r p eco co ip cn i- r ii i- co co � Q a Cl p o a a a a o Q P- $ � 000 - oom � ee � L -f d) of _ a � r00000e o )f2 r 2 oc000000co 0 $ � oco = 000coc o 2 §\ 2� = oo = oo = o0 0 £ ° E )/ 2 \ & ƒ . . . . .. . . . < _ j I 0 = 00000 = oo E� 2 rL 000coocco 0 \� )\ oo � � 0000co o \ \ 0 ] $ CL g / f 000 = - con =e - E / 2 x / kD o000000co Ck 3 Ewa « §2 E + o ° u E / 06 $ \ 000000 = o = Cl = btu CD CD ) ME 000000000 LL E ° + 9 § 03cD D 2 $_ § 6C) ca e C, U) �u a a � w & 6 4 EGE £ 2 ± £ e z i t E E E E » m 3 = EEE E Eaq ® \ / / / , ) a CCD it< << < < < < << 3fDj \ // / / � \ j � \ 0000c0000c < t- o = cc000co CD $ IL or - m0000 = m U) j ) \ } e3 \ = em@b2R / � ( = oc0000co cm E c0000 = co = o ± ec0000000 ID ¢ §\ 0 _ { = oc0000co 0 )LLf e w ƒ � c00000eo 0 of � 2 2 000 = ccoe o E 2cD c00000eo 0Li G ,R k� 0E yae mo / co § §ee � = 2 ° e � _ _ ■ 9 \ o = o j in § $ , m e r m u E \ / \ o ocoCDP ooco c I •� ) « J d; 8 E / W = erm � er g 3 ° 7 ± ± {\ � CL CL00oc0000co ED � � - � / § � \ \ tt \ } = LL � kf0 rE d � ao = OIe & 6 & 6 z & § ¥ m r r o E # E � 'E—E 2 \ E E E E e 2 e $ E E E E L=L m a m o o o o 0000 djaL\t3m)0t2 omor ga0000 kk§ k oo O O b b ¢ ¢g P q O N CL CL CI o a Cl a o¢ v ¢ o F � � N J d ❑ E : P 0 LL 2 H 4 g q O a a a b O ¢ L IZ' b b <n g v q v o v a N x J L 07 o Zr cn a E d a o O v v o g q o OL aL n Y y LL co0 O7 D a 0 a a O b C] � t'L t C❑ C> O b Cl b¢ ¢ ¢ P q C I N m � � a CL � v P o o c o o b b b 7 F Q O US h� L ❑ 5 W E O O O O h o ¢ b¢ N 2 O m Q L n ❑ F N V b O o ¢ c Co g P q O U ❑ � C _ v v U ❑ m O V F o P P ¢v g q P q (D cn d = 3 27 R L C ~ OJ If) O O ¢C g q 4 P 4 ❑ C C w U Q ❑ N a ❑ N Q Q U ~ •V a D O n C O b b b b N OO LL a LO (:> o a'U cyL 2 Nr O CO ❑ 0] F CD 4] C 61 U r7 C, 0uUJF ❑ N 0N r7 oa rbc obbcn q E [9 E C C -;f C @ 0 V N R7 4] N EEEE LL V} f%j [1] o o o ❑ U u U u @ � ddaaaa- aaa. c �2 � o '0 oto M V b M q riM v a �) C, o g o c o o c o N Q7 a P P n P Cl o b Cl CD- 0 0 2 a o 0 o N N a N v S p LZ L r o b o b a o 0 o a o O O n Cl n n Co P a a N 0 o a o 0 0 o a o P J L 0- E n boo a o a n ❑ a CL ❑ 22 � Y QJ CL P P P P P P P b b O 0- 0❑ ❑ b b o o b a o 0 0 0 IV N a ❑ Q ❑ b b b o 0 0 o n o 0 Y ❑ 0 H cac �LU G ❑ E P P o O r b N r N M 2 C LL C Q 6 p N y U O Q n O n a P 4 P R U @ 0 U QJ cc d ❑ QS O n n n a n n n P P V7 N � C � �1 d ❑❑ Q ❑ L U Cr b b O � � U 0aJ Y 0 6] N 4 0O Q7 y Z N O O U VE C P P b Q p 6 o b O N O O N LL d NQQO 7 �La LL2 N d w [p y F- CD U L d L U ii Q ❑ U co O7 N N w t'V co 0000O6Nb o N E Q E ❑ C C C C t 0EEEE °' m m7L- E E E E ii cn CO U) ❑ ❑ ❑ o UUUC) m Fh P Ln o 0 Ln o u7 VM mcq c'i � � ? V �n 'n b a b o c a Cl 01 o Traffic Count Data from TZAR for Mohouli Heights Senior Neighborhood Project - September 2011 aa � t 5Z F n � OZ `Dw LO `4 05 N . z 04 1 T r' 04 OZY 0 m CD 5z Z V of Z cn M 0 �n rn a t 044 w v r Ozc ; a ° oos Z a ❑ ° Y 554 v a 'n L13 `° co r OW b4 Z r 2 M J O V Li. N LL W Lo L D :rt7 O 2 ' v LL Y o N L OEa o t OL 0 2 Q1 ' ' r £ 1 r O4 ca a ' ]�[ OZ 1 ~, T r OZ 1 '-1 TW r Y o Y o Y mLO Do w Q a5 99 99 0 5[ w Ln � u, t 0e4 a ,°c ter ' O£4 N . Q ❑ 1 r 544 o 0 L 1 T r x 55£ oo ►n N r O OLL Z rcov State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Traffic Count Station Data + � r 8 �wg 31�$ ria s8 a� R m v C .- S o � � d a v a v � V � ry ry ry r✓ r'v N nmi N N N rv � N ry ry N [� rmn rh M am ry ry O Y M O macj r7 9 � N � Y O 7 - V Na N � - - - r r r r r —r r- - - � � � .- - - - - -r r a` o 6 - - _ � � � r• rr � �. - - - C4, T > W � x a ° Wa� oae c�oa? `m �❑ ��$ 8 � � 48 � d $ a � BVmvg � Mv $ p t' u°C. _ =G q x x �i x x N L7 ❑ W v a o o C a C -G �� a1xry rr' ^"� o 'o 'oS � a o aoaaaSS38aoo v rE a a a a a a a a a a a s a a v p� [O ,n � N ry n � � m nni ry H N ery N �+t � ^YL N nl rmi ry ti ry ry 73 -' ter 7 c LU Z F a r".� r"J .�.� `r W r - - - - - m m j 3 r co 4 �^ 8 a g a � n g r n k w a e g � not .n a `� � m 8 "' o � .n a F a o 0 0 o $ v $ ti b ti G _ a N a g a v 8 r^ o Q $ o e 8 �2 M y n o $ w v al N ~ m r cfl v �+ to 0 N o m vi m vw m v v m w m 4 Y T O a ry rr ry M n ep LO G N t g o o g � w 8 V'I ❑ �, W �z x� a z z �0=_ ❑ fi g = ri� g M H � � � a g � � v $ � � a $ �' a v � � o Q ca ari d ax25 xx xx o . . . p p V ❑O ❑ c n ¢¢¢C ¢ a 3¢¢a a r L N rn is u� N - - ^ m - - - S �^ s � - r �2 N o 0 )em -F ° 7itM ; M � mm - �� g 5Q u 8 $ o 0 0 g b b b o ;E 9 9 IS - - - - o � a N. e � � n ry ry ry N N N N • N N +V � � M ^� ry n F m9 °P a w - - - - - -. 0 t 7 $ - - - - - - S � - - - - O Y C fl ? w n a p�op 8—F! QI = a V Q ❑ ai E n C 2r ❑ �.O a2 �� ��� xF �m xx1 � o�6 ._ N 'J �^+ vo -o -a3' oao03S8 r7 W x Y a u G F xd 031 n g 'r" s � � �nc ua4�a aaansca =_? = xa r = =� = a o 00 o a ac 2c v � S S3 0 ono n ry a T a E a a a a ❑a a a a E n aco �. Fa rn y� CL .. H p x p •3 ��� F N 4i 4 � ��S � P O � - N N n - - r � - - � r w � N Y a o a W 7 2 � n � E c r $ "' o� ,n g ._n M � 6 a v $ � � e � S d ry N d rn r- m ory m m v M m $ ren v 1 R O [� N Q O C) c 8 m a x N v W ❑❑ x x a=x $ 4 x x 1� 4 f r^ �R e g t2 a a r 2 ^ 8 r m e 8 r o mo ��Yo �W ��dxo g�sxxx �i Y M p oO ❑ 2mmm g a❑ � ��� ❑ �a �� F r p o a o 'r3' a' v o o a $ $ $ S o 0 0 y+3aaaa -- aaQaaa = nada �j 0 N3 � a g a N = F �I .- E a d n ,p a 4 m e .i O `o c o p Nh O R f 0 ''p pp p ppp V Q im ee ] d a _ 7 4 0 o S N❑l u� ar $Qzz� xx ry�xs Na ��o 6005AS $ oovo m ¢LL ❑ a x x x $a F N tvv nyy TT O� �� 4 4 Y 0� 4 4 4 4 0 D O � � 0 0 0 0 0 0 pp aE pQz aaa a°C a a ���aa an dEEEE � r7 co a S ti n ~2 y p N d= Q •m 6z V uC{ 91m98 - n — r r r r _ NI _ co Ci Q ❑ b ¢ Q $ s ^ $ 5tv82R * 820 2 911 ° s $ o o a g s $ s s t $ b b b coI $ ¢ $ d lo rc $ s s a Z ;7 � $' a � � � $ a � 9, Apr � .ry N ' ^� a � _ _ °° "' � ° �. v a m e ❑ nes _T p a N ry 1 N r n m - - — a - Q - T M M in ie'f Q N CL x p a W N .c H a 31 zcF5o� U 64 N ' 2Q&2v. o o pOma_ 2m0 2T 3vO3ff_ a0 3V apPs�n ap.- 2 co = a e m o e a G ❑ p a y¢E ay y $ r on g n e g y$y v e ` Q o0 N = O g� N O Xeepp pp vv pp rrvv w u - x E r e 2 � O rvPi v IPR 6 m a a N E P ~ O b 0 0 0 0@ P Ni o 9 g C 4 '�" r ^ ❑ 0. ri 4 P I g 6 9 O ud rrrJJJ 4 vv ww a vy pp�I cc nn w r In N N tau N ry ev N N ry n�i N N ry emu N rn +� m m a in rnm me n 4 N m M - e - w � - ry - - ry ry `- n $ I- n c 4 g N p T - g Q1 6 W Q dE n Q rnQ ry O p vI r9n * ttvv ttv� g 12 m a OT v v N SAK 4�n 12 M � 8�{ N O u a 2 S❑ 0.S ❑ 2 F M Y n O p� he O0 z- p o o O O 6 p N r Q � O p 9 4 o O Op O o O O O G •-O �[Y Y Y ��.. Y Y iJ d o m 4 osC Imo' Y M 4 0 n v ?p� O MP. D •n d g ~ 2 'F xw F5 dad G a a rO o a a .e p x ti x a o a o d S 3 0 v o $ S a a o C E 3 a a a a o a a s 3 4 a b a s a 2224 m a N dr LL 7 ❑ z rT Ex Y Q. LLJ 19 O O o 12 pO Y'I o 4' Oma- bm 4 Q Q SS 4 O 1� n G Q P p d d d ❑ G G O p m v C C O L5 p � a a 4 a 8 t2 ann V.CC O � 5P c �a�$ m2m T v 8 r a 2 Y S P O 8 g d O O 6 d 7 G d 4 9 9 b t 9 a a ❑ P r ^ �� $ r a v a`, m rr g 'a P ✓I Y a V - 4 m m rs N 4 S o a D Y 6 �l' N � j yaj a�O d2 ��QJ a� ❑ 3Q 6 Q pp p o p aa N W x z x x x r m N N T F a g e w a ae G Qs ¢s a 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 O c o $ $ S n a a a $ to � p ar�G 20aa ,c� '� YaYaGax=gC g mq $ r' v rv8r"�' IaivB � Q O A 80 `� `� E'2 f =' Q �{ E E`2 ❑ ul W Y] N r p cZ 6 0 0 0 C 9 4 o O O O O P 4 0 cv = o� LSA e �3aaQa �aa3aaaQ xz aoa m xOL o y mm pp � ry ryN pp,� .p mm x o 0 N H N C 0 0 9 fl 0 0 O O Q g o � ^ r o 0 0 0 0 0 9 o b ti v a E � � .n N N ✓� ry � n m � N m N ry N =` � � m � n N N m ry a N M - - a - - a � m v - is 0 r `o 0 o°- 7 7 a _a ❑ ❑ O u 2 g '4 A y 8 tc m �r� g V 5tv g2 _ p a p a x ac �4�p a p ry ❑ $ r ^a ^o v o a 9 0 0 0 0 $ $ $ c o 0 0 8 u� Dt YCC u Q Z [? � m V H � m V8. � � N u 7 1' u] ¢ a IY �v �v e'.� C� �0a YQq �� 07¢ Y� ry N== 0. � � r pp O0 Otj poZ � 1g aonv � F3 8 � a � aasaa ��aaaa �aaaaN� 7 co N � 4 � rPn N � T ry m N n n ry v k ry EM Q= p O = Z o o Y � a r g 4 m � 9 A 8 a 8 .? 8 8 a 8 $ a s LU v ^ m $ oldo � v � Z ti D C—;5 P 9 C Y D o $ $ 9 $ $ _ �I g a = a a a Q. mm �mp �p mm ep mm pmp pp,� ry�u nn�� pp�� .p z rv ^ r r t a w n - v - vt r r-r - m .- - rLO _a LO a CL g ❑ 'o 10 �7 g Gx x 2 z p � �Y 2 �" ��+ �����❑ a� a���gaz 3Wz �p � � a 'oSS2 `d' � � a v o o $ $ $ $ 0 000 '8 o m S Zaa¢¢ oaa n $daa¢ x3a 'o�� F oc v v � S3aaa o Q � $ S3ovvo cnai dc z T 3 o � N � g S kms k76s ^8rs yy .pp �uu pp� pp. 0 0.onn .aoo 6 N N 6 0 0 Q o O 0 O p p p O O G Q 4 r ' CM m b cl .., C ti V-K d In NSe y $ = M e $ P m$� m 4 G9 a a m a ¢ a im 6 m a T Gm �C C N Noc N b - - - N - -. - - n N - - - d m T M m S o C g N 2 3 7 r r - - r _ _ - '- w ry r - r - m � � P p$$g$ G •ryn Q s a c 4 3 $ r o 8 _ c $ 97 2 o u° °.5 a nS "ddpi E"❑' Zq =O r r v $ .n a $. v 8 m 4 $ v' v '� m N oC g0a_cxp anc Npsp � a $ 6 S00000a � 0000aS � $ ovv & 7 a 5w ¢a 2arrx CY`u$¢� aLa�aa � � $ n � 8r vg m a 8 nv8 "_ m $ G Ca: o�a Y oa�axQ rv�nz cc �Li s3 aaa °cad n 3 dada d� �a��av C� 4 ~ a u x a a r� n C Y C CCO E'2 5 r pf M a m mM - - _ _ _ .. - - -.- - - - = a Ems°. 2 g S o o $ g r al a $ o g Q d kn n - y 1 � _ O y[ N 7 D g y GcL C a a E O 4 s $ $ a a fl cc N a c u E E "°la w,: r _ _ _ _ t o a CC O 3 a ¢ T '. i �n a � cc cp yy pp ,,pp $ o ti d o 8 a E E 9 c b n a a N N N g m Q C uMi n - v P - - 4 m - O O S O s a m 4 W a N f 3 a v$ Z a s 2� f❑ n nae c $ M Q g " M K Z �� 5 FS =Qogoiu n e .. - .- 01 Et � xx � xr NI �� a a 000 `�"d� � 3loaooSSSga vo C '0 a s aw R uaal C s.��a w ae d e g q $ " 0 O m a ry4 baa YaE � o auk x � ry�rya 3 a a c a s a a 3 a a a a d E a civ c" a - $ m e $ �, M ry g ti ry ti ry ti 7 - P a ry d= Q Et a p rm V C I w a = � 7 S o a m 8 m 8 S M c m w m ry ti m N _ ' N _ co dp a o � Z a oe o $ o a g 4 0 0 �e a o a � � � r � � n n Nrv � a . z ro n � � � � � r .., ., r � m 4 � r� wp i0 Q [V 8 0 � m G S o it A pR g $' � � o u n a n v - v ••, - m n a � n a ;a .m. � � _ $ oae E� a ac a z n f o 'a °` °_ _ E� xi °xxG SES Ep M $ $ " T N g Mv8 4 v 8 � N48 n �u 0. e � gee fa ��a� � � 'o 'o 'e o o o v a $ 8 S S S o 0 00 m D N a a a a a a a 6 a a a a o 3 a « = o a N 4 4 L I i, � S9� ryry � '.E r a oamr mm �cwY � a � ry I � _ r R��� ofs S o m a m $ M 8 o o r v r o 8 g o 0 0 6 0 $ S 9 $ In 1,4 g S ec 3 0 C r m - a - - N m - - Q - � � � _ nl N n n Q ry,47 CCo naGzprY J n¢q g x a o ac g F0 ova 63 = a 8 15D . . $ Ix of riz� IW � n _ `t � r4n, g r o g r rv�i Nv $ v a $v v� v� s M 4 C O W 4 y n y Y x ITN =N x _ _ - N- 4 9 0 0 0 O 6 O O o v 6 6 6 O 9 P O a' �1 0.d a p a a n S 4 n ❑ a n n a nt g E n a a S2 �C � _ N ry m e m ^� ^ •u ry N ry N ru ry n ry �V ervii w � cp ce yy p �p 7 x 4 o StG ? F m2865mS. $ m6m $ m 19 $ 3 m a o_ _ m o 7 a � C] 00 v a o S Z ry '_' v A 4 $ ry A r co O nem m _ ti _ m m o ? n v m aLO N i a c 4 �a� sac 4 p c a�] � �a � � o o c e� `^ M $ "' � v $ � n z $ ❑ ` � t Y 2= I 2 � � [7 E❑ S• _ N $ r in 4 g n�� r.� �yv Y .NP.i v v Q 11 .� u41 Y a u0.]a S m g g o aE q o $ o u Y G s 8 $ = M q $ v g n v ¢[+1 G• 73 �❑� ��r�� Sq �� �aw� Yw� � 'a o v `o a o o 'a' a v o w vu S S $ P 9 o a ~ C 3 a a a¢ a s 3 a a -K = a s a � � a I w i � c F m r ry rw 4 O .nnn o u 4u g an a 8e o m a $ 33, ppo p v R r g N Q M1 N ry N r+' S O � O P 4 9 G v � � C � ❑ O O O b 8 � � r r ppp pyp g O d a v o n o 4 0 4 4 0 4 a 9 4 O 99B a R a ;i �� vv OO mm yv N N ^m1 N M aN m uMi tl a W C m - u - � - M N n N ss O O �_ d N mm u:i T a 8gog _ 'o CL m Y 'c 6 4 [�[77 D W j P N p pp pp pp pp 41 2 C u �S � m a x x x x x x ❑ ❑ rr,� N ua } roFi 2--8 �4;0 G ¢�¢ a+ax zt C O� � � = r?*Y d F O b b bg n O o L N 5 cE ❑a n��OC� a3a a�a d����a N �' Q7 C M ( r ti ry K m c M rCr C CC YC Q w N ❑ O Y K p m r v Q p fY p ry M ^-. N evv r et - - - - Y - Y - 4 O N N D Y d d n � 'J r - S - P - - � p ^ � ^ F mC � c � a o I $ o a 3n o a 8 S a o v o v g $ G ° - - - - r - Ff wo¢OO Qm8m4. 6iO F 9 9 co $ a 8 a a o � D 7� a Q a 04 Lei O ❑ a up c.n J a °a 83 qg r n z pj s � " 1Col= z° xx $❑��fl v8 "a v' v N U y,� a Q 3p Q a 0 a y g W C ( v v 4 G O C 6 d b O O 9 o n O 9 G 03 _ yy O mU�.1 Q pi ❑ p [� 3 m � C � ❑6 W x ��d a �6 �Y 6 po C Y x G =y W p N a 'a° u ❑ E E E ri fl ¢ z ¢N 0 0 0 o g g g `d' a4 o v o g CA 0 0 o r d c $ c • �¢ ¢Q a p¢¢ ¢ ¢a Q �3 a a o n a p 3 N a x w Z a a � � t Appendix B Intersection Operations Analysis — Synchro Worksheets Adjusted Year 2020 Peak Hour Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 Int Delay,slveh 3-2 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations 1� +, 414 Traffic Vol,vehfh 45 486 5 11) 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,veh;h 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Confhcdng Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free stop Stop Stop Stop Stop stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length 150 150 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 0 Grade,% - 0 - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 528 5 11 186 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 Ma' rlMinor Ma'or1 _ Ma•or2 Minor1 iffinorZ Conflicting Flow All 278 (} 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stage 1 - 629 629 - 254 254 - Stage 2 273 300 - 675 631 - Cribcai Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6,22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Cribcal Hdwy Sig 2 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3-318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 1035 259 268 548 248 284 807 Stage 1 - - 470 475 750 697 - Stage 2 - - 733 666 444 474 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 1035 236 255 548 192 270 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 236 255 192 270 Stage 1 452 457 - 722 689 Stage 2 690 659 - 353 456 Approach EB WB NB 5B HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0.3 20.4 12.3 HCM LOS C B Minor LanelMajor M_vmt NBLn1 _EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl Capacity(vehlh) 347 1285 1035 533 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0-329 0.038 0.011 0.077 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.4 7.9 8.5 12.3 HCM Lane LOS C A n B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 0 0.3 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 kdersedon Int Delay,slveh 3-2 mo"m" EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T1 T *To 4. Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,vehlh 45 486 5 10 171 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None None - None Storage Length 150 150 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 - 0 - 0 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 49 528 5 11 186 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 MajorNkm Ma' rl Ma ort Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 278 f} 0 533 0 0 902 929 531 929 885 232 Stage 1 - - - - 629 629 - 254 254 - Stage 2 - - 273 300 - 675 631 Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy SLg 1 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - 6.12 5.52 . 6.12 5.52 follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2-21F 3.515 4.018 3-318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 1035 259 268 548 248 284 807 Stage 1 - 470 475 - 750 697 - Stage 2 - - - 733 666 - 444 474 - Platoon Mocked,"/c Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1285 1035 236 255 548 192 270 807 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 236 255 192 270 - Stage 1 452 457 722 689 Stage 2 69[} 659 353 456 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0-7 0.3 20.4 12-3 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NSLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) 347 1285 - 1035 533 HCM Lane VIC natio 0.329 0.038 0.011 0.077 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.4 7.9 8.5 12.3 HCM Lane LCIS C A A B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 0 0.3 Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouii Street 1111312020 --* --p. -,* f- F 4-- 4\ T 1 •� Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r T. t r T�. Traffic Volume(vehlh) 16 366 191 115 139 180 144 610 405 145 170 8 Future Volume i;vehlh) 16 366 191 115 139 180 144 610 405 145 170 8 Initial Q(Qh),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_phT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhAn 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 17 398 208 125 151 196 157 663 440 158 185 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,°I, 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 252 205 266 586 748 634 225 690 34 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.26 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 739 959 1781 1870 1585 1781 1769 86 Grp VoUrne(v), vehlh 17 398 208 125 0 347 157 663 440 158 0 194 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehNin 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1698 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 17.4 9.7 4.5 0.0 16.7 4.7 29.7 20.8 4.8 0.0 6.4 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c),s 0.8 17.4 9.7 4.5 0.0 16.7 4.7 29.7 20.8 4.8 0.0 6.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 109 530 449 252 0 472 586 748 634 225 0 723 VIC Ratio(X) 0.16 0.75 0.46 0.50 0.00 0.74 0.27 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a),veh)h 109 530 449 252 0 472 586 748 634 225 0 723 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filler(I) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.1 29.4 26.6 23.4 0.0 29.5 14.6 25.1 22.4 21.0 0.0 18.7 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 3.0 9.4 3.4 6.8 0.0 9.8 1.1 14.6 6.2 16,8 0.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BackQfQ(50%),vehAn 0.4 0.6 3.9 2.2 0.0 7.6 1.9 14.8 8.1 2.8 0.0 2.7 Unsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.1 38.8 30.0 30.2 0.0 39.3 15.7 39.7 28.6 37.8 0.0 19.6 1 nGrp LOS D D C C A D B D C [] A B Approach Vol,veWh 623 472 1260 352 Approach Delay,slveh 36.0 36.9 32.8 27.8 Approach LOS D D C C Timer- ned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc), s 10.0 40.5 9.5 30.0 10.9 39.6 10.0 29.5 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 6.4 35.1 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(g c+a1),s 6.8 37.7 6.5 19.4 6.7 8.4 2.8 18.7 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.6 HCM 6th LOS C Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NSR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ T *14 4. Traffic Vol,vehlh 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol, vehlh 20 292 5 50 407 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - None Storage length 150 150 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 0 0 Grade, % a 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, 'X� 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 22 317 5 54 442 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 Alla' 1Minor Majorl Majqr2 Knorl M11nor2 Conflicting Flow All 447 0 0 322 0 0 958 919 320 936 919 445 Stage 1 - - - - - 364 364 553 553 - Stage 2 - 594 555 383 366 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy SLg 1 - 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1113 1238 - 237 271 721 245 271 613 Stage 1 - 655 624 - 517 514 - Stage 2 - 491 513 - 640 623 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1113 1238 - 191 254 721 217 254 613 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 191 254 - 217 254 - Stage 1 - 642 612 507 491 Stage 2 405 490 593 611 Approach EB WB NB 58 HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0.9 14.8 15.3 HCM I US H C Minor LanelMafnr Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBI7 WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) 411 1113 - 1238 433 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.103 0.02 0.044 0-193 HCM Control Delay(s) 14.8 8.3 8 15.3 HCM Lane LOS B A A C HCM 95th°Mile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.7 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TVVSC 9, MohouN Street & Kupuna Place 11i13+2n2a Intersection Int Delay, slveh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t + r r Traffic Vol,vehlh 4 315 485 40 48 4 Future Vol, vehlh 4 315 485 40 48 4 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage L ength 200 200 300 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 342 527 43 52 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 INinor2 Conflicting Flow All 570 0 0 877 527 Stage 1 - 527 - Stage 2 - 350 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Poi Cap-1 Maneuver 1002 319 551 Stage 1 - 592 Stage 2 - - 713 - Platoon blocked, % MDVCap-1 Maneuver 1002 318 551 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 318 - Stage 1 590 Stage 2 713 Approach EB WB SB NCM Controf Belay,s 0.1 0 18 HCM I DS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 1002 318 551 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.004 0.164 0.008 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.6 18.5 11.6 HCM Lane LDS A C g HCM 95th%file Q(veh) 0 0.6 0 Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 11/1312020 --I ---p. --* f.- 4--- *--- 4\ t �► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SUR Lane Configurations + r 11� t r Traffic Volume(veh1h) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Future Volume(vehlh) 10 174 179 300 333 110 180 280 175 130 490 12 Initial Q(Qh),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_phT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work lone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehfhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flaw Rate, vehlh 11 189 195 326 362 120 196 304 190 141 533 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 382 373 124 325 748 634 445 709 17 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow,veh1h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1344 446 1781 1870 1585 1781 1818 44 Grp Volume(v), vehrh 11 189 195 326 0 482 196 304 190 141 0 546 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhAn 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1790 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1862 Q Serve(g__s), s 0.5 7.3 9.0 5.0 0.0 24.0 6.0 10.5 7.4 4.2 0.0 22.8 Cycle 0 Clear(g-c),s 0.5 7.3 9.0 5.0 0.0 24.0 6.0 10.5 7.4 4.2 0.0 22.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 109 530 449 382 0 497 325 748 634 445 0 726 VIC Ratio(x) 0.10 0.36 0.43 0.85 0.00 0.97 0.64 0.41 0.30 0.32 0.04 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 382 0 497 325 748 634 445 0 726 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filte0l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 39.9 25.7 26.4 31.0 0.0 32.1 18.4 19.3 18.4 15.3 0.0 23.7 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 1.9 1.9 3.0 21.0 0.0 33.4 8.1 1.6 1.2 1.9 0.0 7.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackdfQ(50%),vehAn 0.3 3.3 3.6 6.5 0.0 14.2 2.9 4.5 2.7 1.8 0.0 10.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp 0elay(d),siveh 41.8 27.6 29.4 51.9 0.0 65.5 26.5 21.0 19.6 17.2 0.0 30.7 LnGrp LOS D C C: D A E C: C B B A C Approach Vol,vehlh 395 808 690 687 Approach Delay,srveh 28.9 60.1 22.2 28.0 Approach LOS C E C C Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s. 10.0 40.5 9.5 30.0 10.9 39.6 10.0 29.5 Change Period(Y�Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 6.4 35.1 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(9_c+11),s 6.2 12.5 7.0 11.0 8.0 24.8 2.5 26.0 Green Ext Time(p,c),s 0.0 2.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 lawsecdon Summary HCM 61h Cid Delay 36.6 HCM 6th LCIS D Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour Background without Project HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 IntefsecOm Int belay, slveh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NOL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I ' T 4 4� Traffic Vol,vehih 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol,vehlh 45 491 5 10 172 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Conflicting Peds.#N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - None None Storage Length 150 150 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Flour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles-% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 49 534 5 11 187 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 M1a r1Mirtor1 art Minorl Minar2 Conflicting Flaw All 279 0 0 539 0 0 909 936 537 936 892 233 Stage 1 - - - - 635 635 - 255 255 - Stage 2 - - 274 301 681 637 Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.21P 3.518 4.018 3.318 3-518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1284 1029 256 265 544 245 281 806 Stage 1 467 472 749 696 Stage 2 - 732 665 440 471 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1284 1029 - 233 252 544 189 267 806 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 233 252 - 189 267 Stage 1 449 454 721 688 Stage 2 689 658 350 453 Approach ES W8 NS SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.6 12.4 HCM I OS C 8 Minor LanelMa or Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) 343 1284 - 1029 529 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.333 0.038 0.011 0.078 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.6 7.9 - 8.5 12.4 HCM Lane LOS C A A B HCM 95th%file Q(veh) 1.4 0.1 0 0.3 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 1111312020 intersection Int belay,siveh 1.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SSL SBR Lane Configurations t t r r Traffic Vol,vehih 14 535 257 80 43 10 Future Vol, vehlh 14 535 257 80 43 10 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 200 200 300 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 Q - 0 Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 15 582 279 87 47 11 Major/Minor Ma"or1 Ma"or2 FAmr2 Conflicting Flow All 366 0 0 891 279 Stage 1 - - 279 - Stage 2 612 Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1193 - 313 760 Stage 1 - 768 - Stage 2 - 541 Platoon blacked,% Mov trap-1 Maneuver 1193 - 309 760 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 309 Stage 1 758 Stage 2 541 APproach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 17 H(W LOS C Minor LanelMa'or Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 1193 309 760 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.013 0.151 0.014 HCM Control Relay(s) 8.1 18.7 9,8 HCM Lane LDS A C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.5 0 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection S,Immary 6- Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 Movewnt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t T-� t r 1� Traffic Volume(veh1h) 17 367 194 115 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18 Future Volume tueh1h) 17 367 194 115 147 180 172 610 405 145 170 18 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbl) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Rus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Ione On,Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhAn 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 18 399 211 125 160 196 187 663 440 158 185 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 251 212 260 581 748 634 225 627 fib Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow,vehlh 1781 1870 1585 1781 765 937 1781 1870 1585 1781 1659 179 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 18 399 211 125 0 356 187 663 440 158 0 205 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1702 1781 1 B70 1585 1781 0 1838 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 17.5 9.9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 4.9 0.0 7.0 Cycle Q Clear(q_c),s 0.9 17.5 9.9 4.5 0.0 17.2 5.7 29.7 20.8 4.9 0.0 7.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 109 530 449 251 0 473 581 748 634 225 0 694 VIC Ratio(X) 0.17 0.75 0.47 0.50 0.00 0.75 0.32 0.89 0.69 0.70 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 251 0 473 581 748 634 225 0 694 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filtero) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.1 29.4 26.7 23.4 0.0 29.7 14.9 25.1 22.4 21.2 0.0 19.6 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 3.2 9.5 3.5 6.9 0.0 10.6 1.5 14.6 6.2 16.8 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IXAe Back0(Q(50%),vehAn 0.5 8.7 3.9 2.2 0.0 7.9 2.3 14.8 8.1 2.9 0.0 3.0 Unsig.Movement Deiay,slveh LnGrp Qelay(d),slveh 43.3 38.9 30.2 30.3 0.0 40.3 16.4 39.7 28.6 38.0 0.0 20.7 LnGrp LOS D D C C A D B D C D A C Approach Vol,vehlh 628 481 1290 363 Approach Delay, slveh 36.1 37.7 32.5 28.2 Approach LOS 0 0 C C Timer.Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.0 40.5 9.5 30.0 12.0 38.5 10.0 29.5 Change Period(Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 5.5 36.0 5.0 25.5 7.5 34.0 5.5 25.0 Max Q Clear Time(9_c+11),s 6.9 31.7 6.5 19.5 7.7 9.0 2.9 19.2 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.0 0,0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.7 HCM 6th LOS C 2025 Background AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohouli Street 11113/2020 Intersection Int Delay,siveh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT ESR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SRR Lane Configurations 1� T *T+ *T+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol, vehlh 20 295 5 50 412 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None None None Storage Length 150 150 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 a 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Ve111CIeS,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flaw 22 321 5 54 448 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 Ma •orlMinor Ma•or1 Ma•0r2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 453 0 0 326 0 0 968 929 324 946 929 451 Stage 1 - - - - 368 368 - 559 559 Stage 2 - - 600 561 - 387 370 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6-12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 Follow-tip Hdwy 2-218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4-018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1108 1234 233 268 717 241 268 608 Stage 1 - - 652 621 - 513 511 - Stage 2 - - 488 510 637 620 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1108 1234 187 251 717 214 251 608 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 187 251 - 214 251 Stage - 639 609 503 489 Stage 2 402 488 590 608 Approach EB WB NB 5B HCM Control Delay,5 0.5 0.9 14,9 15.4 HCM LDS B C Moor Lane/Ma er Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehlh) 406 1108 1234 429 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.104 0-02 0.044 0.195 NCM Control Delay(s) 14.9 8.3 8.1 15.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A C HCM 95th%file Q(veh) 0,3 0.1 0.1 0.7 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouh Street & Kupuna Place 11113,202U Intersecdon Int Delay, sIveh 2.3 Movernm EBL EBT WBT WBR SSL SBR Lane Configurations t t r r Traffic Vol,vehih 7 315 485 59 94 9 Future Vol, vehih 7 315 485 59 94 9 Conflicting Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 D 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 200 200 300 Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Fact-or 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 342 527 64 102 10 Ma' r1FAinor Maul Major? fAnor2 Conflicting Flow All 591 0 0 885 527 Stage 1 - - - 527 - Stage 2 - 358 Critical Hdwy 4,12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 985 - 315 551 Stage 1 - 592 - Stage 2 707 - Platoon blocked, °I, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 9B5 - 312 551 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 312 - Stage 1 - 587 Stage 2 - 707 Appmach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 21.2 HCM Las C NGnor LanelM or Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity(vehih) 985 312 551 HCM Lane VIG Ratio 0.008 0-327 0-018 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.7 22.1 11.7 NCM Lane LOS A C B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 1.4 0.1 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6- Komohana Street & Mohouli Street * 11113/2020 4 4\ I I' + Movement EBI. EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NHL NBT NBR S8L SBT SOR Lane Configurations t r T + i T�. Traffic Volume(veh1h) 20 182 207 300 338 114 191 280 175 130 490 15 Future Volume(veh1h) 20 182 207 300 338 110 191 280 175 130 490 15 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_phT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 22 198 225 326 367 120 208 304 190 141 533 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 4.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh,'!Q 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 428 418 137 302 663 562 420 584 18 Arrive On Green 11.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0,07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flaw,v" 1781 1870 1585 1781 1350 441 1781 1870 1585 1781 1806 54 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 22 198 225 326 0 487 208 304 190 141 0 549 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhfln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1791 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1861 Q Serve(g s), s 1.1 7.6 "0.7 7.9 0.0 23.2 6.8 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 7.6 10.7 7.9 0.0 23.2 6.8 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 25.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 Lane Grp Gap(c),vehlh 109 530 449 428 0 555 302 663 562 420 0 602 VIC Ratio(X) 0.20 0.37 0.50 0.76 0.00 0.88 0.69 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 428 0 555 302 663 562 420 0 602 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream FOu(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d), slveh 40.2 25.8 26.9 25.7 0.0 29.4 20.9 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.2 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4.1 2.0 4.0 12.1 0.0 17.6 12.1 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 20.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Wle BackOfQ(50%),vehnn 0.6 3.5 4.3 3.7 0.0 11.9 3.5 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 13.8 Unsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.3 27.9 30.9 37.9 0.0 47.0 33.0 24.7 22,9 20.4 0.0 49.8 LnGr p LOS D C C D A D C C C C A D Approach Vol,vehlh 4457]1 813 702 690 Approach Delay,s)veh 30.2 43.3 26.7 43.7 Approach LOS C 0� D C 0 Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 B 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period('Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 12.7 8.8 27.5 3.1 25.2 Green Ext Time(p-c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.8 HCM 6th LOS D 2025 Background PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 Year 2025 Peak Hour with Project HCM 6th TWSC 3: Kukuau Street & Mohoulf Street 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 3.3 Movement EHL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L SBT SBR Lane Configurations T 1� 4 +T* Traffic Vol,vehlh 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 Future Vol, vehlh 45 493 5 10 179 85 20 30 55 3 5 30 ConFlicung Peds,#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - Norte None None Storage Length 150 150 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - - 0 Grade,% - 0 - - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 49 536 5 11 195 92 22 33 60 3 5 33 Ma•orlMinor Ma orl Ma ort Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 287 0 0 541 0 0 919 946 539 946 902 241 Stage 1 - - - - - - 637 637 - 263 263 - Stage 2 - 282 309 - 683 639 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6,22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - - 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 - 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3,318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1275 1028 252 262 542 241 277 798 Stage 1 - 465 471 742 691 - Stage 2 - - 725 660 439 470 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1275 - 1028 229 249 542 186 263 798 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 229 249 186 263 - Stage 1 447 453 714 683 Stage 2 682 653 349 452 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0.3 20.9 12.5 HCM LOS C g Minor LanelMa•or Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh1h) 339 1275 1028 522 PlCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.337 0.038 0.011 0.079 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.9 7.9 8.5 12.5 HCM Lane LOS C A A R HCM 95th%file O(veh) 1.4 0.1 0 0.3 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 report Page 1 HCM 6th TVVSC 11: Mohouli Street & RURQ Driveway 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR I aric Configurations + t e r Traffic Vol,vehrh 0 551 267 8 0 7 Future Vol, uehlh 0 551 267 8 0 7 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 150 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 Grade,%, 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 599 290 9 0 8 MajarjMinor Majorl Major2 M11nor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 290 Stage 1 - - Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 Follow-up Hdwy :3.318 Poi Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 749 Stage 1 0 0 - Stage 2 0 0 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 749 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 An mach ES WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9.9 HCM I OS A Minor LanelMajor Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 749 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.9 HCM Lane LDS A HCM 95th%file Q(veh) 0 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 P HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11113/2020 Intersection Int belay, slveh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t t r Traffic Vol,vehlh 16 535 265 80 74 10 Future Vol,vehlh 16 535 265 80 74 10 Conflicting Peds.#Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 200 - 200 300 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 582 288 87 80 11 MajarlMinor _Majorl Major2 k4inor2 . Conflicting Flow All 375 0 0 904 288 Stage 1 - - - 288 - Stage 2 616 Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Cribcal Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1183 307 751 Stage 1 761 - Stage 2 539 - Platoon blocked,°/, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1183 303 751 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 303 - Stage 1 750 Stage 2 539 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Del-ay,s 0.2 0 19.8 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Ma'or Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 1183 303 751 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.015 0.265 0.014 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 21.1 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A C A HCM 951h%tile 4(veh) 0 1 0 2025 Total AM Peak I lour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohouli Street 1111312020 * 1 � � .4- 4_, I t Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT MSR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations + r T t r Vil T Traffic Volume(veh1h) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(veh1h) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Initial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Vph, A 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 573 27 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,vehm 1781 1870 1585 1781 1363 430 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhfln 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1 B55 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle O Clear(q_c),s 1.2 7.9 11,6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),vehlh 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 VIC Ratio(X) 10.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),vehfh 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),sfveh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Incr Delay(d2),slveh 4.6 2.1 4.5 12.9 0.0 20.1 17.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 Initial❑ Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %le BackOfQ(50°/6),veMn 0.6 3.6 4.6 3.8 0.0 12.6 4.2 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 14.5 llnsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 LnGfp LOS i] C C D A D D C C C A D Approach Vol,vehlh 468 82b 723 699 Approach Delay,51veh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS C D C D Timer-Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(Y+Rc),s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Tame(g_c+I1), s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p_c),s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0,0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Oclay 38.6 HCM 61h LOS D 2025 Total AM Peak Hour Synchra 11 Report Page 1 HCM 5th TWSC I Kukuau Street & Mchouli Street 1111312020 Intersection Int belay,slveh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ 1r + 4 Traffic Vol,vehfh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Future Vol,vehlh 20 299 5 50 414 5 4 10 25 2 20 55 Conflicting Peds,#1hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None None None Storage Length 150 150 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - 0 0 a Peak Hour factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 325 5 54 450 5 4 11 27 2 22 60 Major/Minor Majorl M2jor2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow A!I 455 0 0 330 0 0 974 935 328 952 935 453 Stage 1 - - - 372 372 - 561 561 - Stage 2 - 602 563 - 391 374 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.12 5.52 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3-518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1106 1229 - - 231 265 713 239 265 607 Stage 1 - - 648 619 512 510 - Stage 2 - 486 509 633 618 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1106 1229 185 248 713 212 248 607 Mov Cap-2 Maneuvef 185 248 - 212 248 - Stage 1 635 607 502 488 Stage 2 400 487 586 606 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.5 0.9 15 15.5 i ICM LOS is C Minor Lane(Major Mvmt NBLnl EBL EBT ESR WBL WBT W8R SBLn1 Capacity[vehlh) 402 1106 ]229 426 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.105 0.02 0.044 0.196 HCM Control Delay(s) 15 8.3 8.1 15.5 NCM Lane LOS C A A C; HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.7 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Pagel HCM 6th TWSC 11 : Mohouli Street & RI1RO Driveway 1111312020 Intersection Int Delay,slveh [] Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t t r r Traffic Vol,vehfh 0 326 462 40 0 2 Future Vol,vehfh 0 326 462 40 0 2 Conflicting Peds,#fhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 150 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 354 502 43 0 2 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 502 Stage 1 - - - - Stage 2 Critical Hdwy 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 Crifical Hdwy Sig 2 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 0 569 Stage 1 0 0 Stage 2 0 0 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 569 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay,5 0 0 11.4 HCM I.()5 B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(vehfh) 569 HCM Lane V1C Ratio 0.004 HCM Control Delay[s] 11-4 HCM Lane LOS B HCM 95th°/agile Q(veh) 0 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 9: Mohouli Street & Kupuna Place 11/1312020 Intersection Int Delay, slveli 3.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations + t r r Traffic Vol,vehlh 11 315 525 59 116 11 Future Vol,veWh 11 315 525 59 116 11 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 200 - 200 300 Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 342 571 64 126 12 1Mir+or Majorl MajiDrZ I4inor2 Conflicting Flow All 635 0 0 937 571 Stage 1 - - 571 - Stage 2 - 366 Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - Follow-up Iidwy 2118 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 948 294 520 Stage 1 - 565 - Stage 2 702 - Platoon blocked,1 Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 948 290 520 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 290 - Stage 1 558 Stage 2 702 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 25.3 HCM LOS D Minor LanelMa ar Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(vehlh) 948 290 520 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.013 0.435 0.023 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.8 26.6 12.1 HCM Lane LOS A D B HCM 95th%fife Q(veh) 0 2.1 0.1 2025 Total PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: Komohana Street & Mohoufi Street 1111312020 --,* --I. -'V 'r- 4--- *-- 4\ T r' �- 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N_B_L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuranons + r T t r 1� Traffic Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 Future Volume(vehlh) 22 187 222 300 350 110 211 280 175 130 490 23 4nitial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_phT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow,vehlhlln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate,vehlh 24 203 241 326 380 120 229 304 190 141 533 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 109 530 449 422 422 133 296 663 562 420 573 27 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow,veh1h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1363 430 1781 1870 1585 1781 1772 83 Grp Volume(v),vehlh 24 203 241 326 0 500 229 304 190 141 0 558 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhAn 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1793 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1855 Q 5erve(g_s),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24.0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c),s 1.2 7.9 11.6 7.9 0.0 24,0 7.5 11.3 7.9 4.7 0.0 26.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 VIC Ratio(X) 0.22 0.38 0.54 0.77 0.00 0.90 0.77 0.46 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a),vehlh 109 530 449 422 0 556 296 663 562 420 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filtef(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay(d),slveh 40.2 25.9 27.3 25.9 0.0 29.7 21.3 22.4 21.3 18.2 0.0 29.5 Incr Delay(d2), slveh 4.6 2.1 4.5 12.9 0.0 20.1 17.8 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 23.0 Initial 0 Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °,bile BackOfQ(50%),vehAn 0.6 3.6 4.6 3.8 0.0 12.6 4.2 5.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 14.5 Unsig.Movement Delay,slveh LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 44.8 28.0 31.8 38.8 0.0 49.8 39.1 24.7 22.9 20.4 0.0 52.5 LnGrp LOS D C C D A D D C C C A D Approach Vol,vehlh 468 826 723 699 Approach Delay, slveh 30.8 45.5 28.8 46.0 Approach LOS C 0 C D Timer•AA ned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.2 36.4 12.4 30.0 14.0 33.6 10.0 32.4 Change Period(Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting(Gmax),s 6.7 31.9 7.9 25.5 9.5 29.1 5.5 27.9 Max Q Clear Time(g_c+11),s 6.7 13.3 9.9 13.6 9.5 28.2 3.2 26.0 Green Ext Time(p-c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 36.5 HCM 61h LOS D 2025 Total PM Peak Hour 5ynchro 11 Report Page 1 Appendix C Intersection Leel of Service Definitions Highway Capacity Manual 2014 Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in terms of a weighted average control delay for the entire intersection. Control delay quantifies the increase in travel time that a vehicle experiences due to the traffic signal control as well as provides a surrogate measure for driver discomfort and fuel consumption. Signalized intersection LOS is stated in terms of average control delay per vehicle(in seconds)during a specified time period (e.g., weekday PM peak hour). Control delay is a complex measure based on many variables, including signal phasing and coordination (i.e., progression of movements through the intersection and along the corridor), signal cycle length, and traffic volumes with respect to intersection capacity and resulting queues. Table 1 summarizes the LOS criteria for signalized intersections, as described in the Highway Capacity Manual 20 10(Transportation Research Board. 2010). 'Table 1.Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control Delay Level of Service (secondslvehicle) General Description A S10 Free Flow B >10-20 Stable Flow(slight delays) C n20—35 Stable flow(acceptable delays) ❑ a35—55 Approaching unstable flow(tolerable delay.occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E >55—80 Unstable flow(intolerable delay) F' X80 Forced flow(congested and queues fail to clear) SPUfce:Highway Capacity Manual 2010,Transponaton Research Hoard,2010. 1. it the volume-to-capacity(vlc)ratio for a lane group exceeds 1.0 LOS F is assigned to the individual lane group.LOS for overall approach or intersection is determined solely by the control delay. Unsignalized intersection LOS criteria can be further reduced into three intersection types:ail-way stop, two-way stop, and roundabout control. All-way stop and roundabout control intersection LOS is expressed in terms of the weighted average control delay of the overall intersection or by approach.Two-way stop- controlled intersection LOS is defined in terms of the average control delay for each minor-street movement(or shared movement) as well as major-street left-turns. This approach is because major-street through vehicles are assumed to experience zero delay, a weighted average of all movements results in very low overall average delay, and this calculated low delay could mask deficiencies of minor movements. Table 2 shows LOS criteria for unsignalized intersections. Table 2.Level of Service Criteria for Unsi nalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay(seconds,'vehicle) A 0-10 B a10—15 C >15-25 D a25—35 E X35—50 F' >50 source'Highway Capacity Manual 2010.Transportation Research Hoard,2010. 1. if the volume-to-capacity tv.+cy rano exceeds 1-0,Los F is assigned an individual lane group for all unsignalized intersections,or minor street approach at two-way swp-controlled intersections.Overall intersection LOS is determined solely by control delay. CDH PLANNING DEPT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS aEC 29 2020 PM4:32 COUNTY OF HAWAIIREC'iJ HAiJ DEL1�'ERED HILO, HAWAII DATE: December 29, 2020 TO: Zendo Kern, Planning Director FROM: Department of Public Works, Engineering Divisi SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) TMK: 2-4-001 :168 We have reviewed the subject request forwarded by your memo dated December 1, 2020 and provide the following: The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and the recommended drainage system shall be constructed meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing, shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawaii County Code. Construction within the County right-of-way (ROW) shall comply with HCC, Chapter 22, County Streets. Connection to Kupuna Place and Mohouli Street will require ROW permits. Install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Questions may be referred to Robyn Matsumoto at 961-8924. Planning Dep , Exhibit 5 1 :18 9 4 2 LV- 1 M, 1rf ,1 5}1 f ri DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAII 345 KEKUANAO'ASTREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAI'I 96720 TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 • FAX (808)961-8657 December 30, 2020 CDH PLANNING DEPT DEC 312020 FI,1:53 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern, Director RECD HAND DELIVERED Planning Department FROM: Keith K. Okamoto, Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary- Amendment Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Tax Map Key 2-4-001:168 We have reviewed the subject application and have the following comments. Please be informed that there is an existing 12-inch waterline along Mohouli Street fronting the subject parcel or an existing 12-inch waterline along Kupuna Place. Based on the consumption history of the Mohouli Senior Housing project, water can be made available in accordance with the Department's existing water availability conditions, which are subject to change without notice. Prior to issuing a water commitment for the proposed project, the Department will request estimated maximum daily water usage calculations, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of I lawai`i, for review and approval. After review of the calculations,the Department will detennine a water commitment deposit amount, prevailing facilities charge (subject to change) to be paid, and any water system improvements required for final approval. Construction plans showing the proposed water system improvements must also be submitted for review and approval. Please be informed that the existing l2-inch waterlines within both roadways are adequate to provide 2,000 gallons per minute for fire protection, as required per the Department's Water System Standards. Any meter(s) serving the proposed project will require the installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five (5) feet ofthe meter on private property. The Department must inspect and approve the installation prior to commencement of water service. Planning Dept. Exhibit— . . . Water, Our_%lost (Precious l ?source . . . Xa ZWai,4 ?bane . . . 13 9 0 L The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Mr. Tendo Kern, Director Page 2 December 30, 2020 Should there he any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriaua of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at q6l-$070, extension `56. Sincerely yours, P �-�5 '�'_ Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg copy—Mr. Keith Kato, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation `�C Y w• y Mitchell D.Roth Ramzi I.Mansour Mayor Director Lee E.Lord Managing Director COH PLANNING DEPT County of Hawai'i DEC 24 2020 Pv,2:50 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REC'D HAND DELIVERED 345 Kekuanao'a Street, Suite 41 • Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Ph:(808) 961-8083 • Fax: (808)961-8086 Email: cohdem@hawaiicounty.gov MEMORANDUM TO: Zendo Kern, Director Planning Department "-7,FROM: Ramzi I. Mansour, Director Environmental Management Department DATE: December 16, 2020 SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawai'i Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Tax Map Key: (3) 2-4-001-0168 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): ® No comments. ❑ Commercial operations,State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. ❑ Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. ❑ Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. ❑ Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawai'i Organics Facility and East Hawai'i Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. ❑ Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. ❑ Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. ❑ Existing Solid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide update to the department on current status. ❑ Other: Planning Depi. Exhi6ill 1 :187 89 County of Iw laai'i is an E-qual Opportunity Provider:md Eimploycr. The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Wastewater Division for details): ❑ No comments. ❑ Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawaii County Code. ❑ Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21- 25.1 of the Hawai'i County Code. Complete Sewer Extension Application. ❑ Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawai'i County Code. ® Check or line our as applicable: ❑ If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management ("Director of DEM"), ® applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide Such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. ❑ Other: RMiscs County of Ilawai'i is an Fqual Opportunity Provider and Fmpioyer. Robert R.K. Perreira Mitchell D. Roth o Mayor Acting Fire Cltief Lee E. Lord #;• o�p Managing Director °��a; + County of Wa�vat`t COO PLANNING DEP' HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT DEC 16 2020 Am 11:47 25 Aupuni Street•Suite 2501• Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)932-2900•Fax(808)932-2928 December 16, 2020 TO: ZENDO KERN,PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: ROBERT R. K. PERREIRA,ACTING FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054) Applicant: Iiawai'i Island Community Development Corporation(HICDC) Request: Agriculture to urban Tax Map Key: (3) 2-4-001:168 In regards to the above-mentioned request, the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1, UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 2006 EDITION Note: llawai'i State Fire Code, National Fire Protection Association 006 rersion. with C'ount_v O'11a11'(1t / clllletl[llllel]LS. Countyamenchnents ar•e identified with a preceding "C'—"ol'the rgference Code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature, or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including, but not limited to, additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. 18.1.1 Plans. 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans f'or fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. X%. W..41. Planning Dep;. Exhibit 8 Hmuei'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. 1 ;; 857 2 Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16, 2020 Page 2 of 8 19.1-1-2 Fire Hydrant Systems, Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. C— 18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions. No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a pernut from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception: Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations, hydrant testing, and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access, 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2, 18.2.2*Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Box(es). The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es) to be installed ij1 an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance. The owner or occupant of a structure or area, with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 18.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. (*may be referred as FDAR) 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes, parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one- and two-family dwellings or private garages,carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400ft' (37 m'-)or less are present, the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16, 2020 Page 3 of 8 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft(15 in) of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside that provides access to the interior of the building. Exception: i and 2 single-family dwellings. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13,NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft {45 m} from Fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or faci lity. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall he permitted to be increased to 450 ft(137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multipie Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4,1 Dimensions. C— 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be}provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. C— 18,2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft G in. C-- 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ, provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus, mid approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. 018.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16, 2020 Page 4 of 8 C-- 18.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads(25 Tons)of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shall be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C— 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a irunimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 tt(46 m) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a Fire department access road, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4,5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C— 18.2.3.4.6.1The maximum gradient ofa Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces, In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s)shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2* The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft(0.3 m drop in 6 m)or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the Fire department, and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft(4.61 m)beyond each edge of the fire lane. 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices.The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. i Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16, 2020 Page 5 of 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2.4* [Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under I8.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1.3* Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and Farriers in accordance with 1$.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. 18.2.4.2.3 Roads. trails, and other access ways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors,barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags• or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1*A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed, or moved 'into or within the county. When any portion of the 1 Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 16, 2020 Page 6 of 8 facility or building is in excess of 150 feet(45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or bui Idi ng, on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ. For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: I. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modifier) by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions,the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupancies, the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2* Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3*The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval,testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C-18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001-3000 square feet, shall have a minima n of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. tendo Kern, Planning Director December 16,2020 Page 7 of 8 Buildings, 3001- 6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections(FDC) to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (1)- (6) of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: 1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and. Firefighting water, the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; 2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be as follows: a) 4" for 0900 PVC pipe: b) 4" for C906 PE pipe; c) 3" for ductile Iron; d) 3' for galvanized steel. 3) The Fire Department Connection(FDC) shall: a) be made of galvanized steel; b) have a gated valve with 2-112 inch, National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; c) be located between 8 ft and t6 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; e) be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; f) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part, but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected, g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code. 4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC. Each FDC shall be independent of each other, with each FDC being capable of flowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus'conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. Zendo Kern, Planning Director December 15, 2020 Page 8 oF8 5) Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFI'A 25. 6) The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: 1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. 2) Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements. 3) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements,the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. 4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds greater than 2000square feet, but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 Feet. 5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact Assistant Fire Chief Ian Smith at(808) 932-2907. ROBERT R. K. PERREIRA Acting Fire Chief R� �aaa f DAVID Y.IGE 1;1 T ELIZABETH A.CHARAD. 1 / DIRECTOR OF HEALTH STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Inrepy,pFie, elerlo: Fie: P.0.BOX 916 HILO,HI 96721.0916 OLH PLANNING DEP MAR 9 2021 PH4:34 RECD HAND DELIVERED MEMORANDUM DATE: March 8, 2021 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Eric Honda �'/'" District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) Request: Agricultural to Urban Applicant: Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) TMK: 2-4-001:168 The applicant would need to meet the requirements of our Department of Health Air Pollution Rules, Chapter 60.1, Title 11, State of Hawaii for fugitive dust control. If there is need to discuss these requirements, please contact our Clean Air Branch staff at Ph. 933-0401. The Department of Health (DOH), Clean Water Branch (CWB), acknowledges receipt of the subject document on December 8, 2020. The CWB has reviewed the limited information contained in the subject document and offers the following comments: Permit Issuance Any project and its potential impacts to State waters must meet the State's: 1) Antidegradation policy, which requires that the existing uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses of the receiving State water be maintained and protected; 2) Designated uses, as determined by the classification of the receiving State waters; and 3) Water quality criteria [Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Chapter 11-54], Planning Dep;, =K A Section 401 Water quality Certification (WQC) is required if your Exhibit w project/activity: Requires a federal permit, license, certificate, approval, registration, or Statutory exemption; and 4 0 3 L JL May result in a discharge into State waters. The term "discharge" is Tendo Kern March 8, 2021 Page 2 of 4 defined in Clean Water Act, Subsections 502(16), 542.(12), and 502(5). Examples of"discharge" include,but are not lim=ited to, allowing the following pollutants to enter State waters from the surface or in-water: solid waste, rock/sand/dirt, heat, Sewage, construction debris, any underwater work, chemicals, fugitive dust/spray/paint, agricultural wastes, biological materials, industrial wastes, concretelsealantlepoxy, and washing/cleaning effluent. Determine if your project/activity requires a federal permit, license, certificate, approval, registration, or statutory exemption by contacting the appropriate federal agencies (e.g. Department of the Army (DA), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Pacific Ocean Division Honolulu District Office (PGH) Tel: 808-835-4303; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tel: 4I5-947-8021; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Tel: 866-208-3372; U.S. Coast Guard Office of Bridge Programs Tel: 202-372-1511). To request a Section 401 WQC, you must complete and submit the Section 401 WQC application. This application is available on the e-Permitting Portal website located at: Please see HAR, chapter 11-54 for the State' Water Quality Standards and for more information on the Section 401 WQC. HAR, Chapter 11-54 is available on the CWB website at: http://IieaItIi.Iiawaii,go lcihb/. • National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit coverage is required for: -Storm water associated with constriction activities for land disturbances of one (1) acre or more. Land disturbance includes, but is not limited to, clearing, grading, grubbing, excavation, demolition, uprooting of vegetation, equipment staging, and storage areas. -Storm water associated with industrial activities for facilities with Standard Industrial Classification Codes regulated in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i) through (ix) and (xi). -Storm water and certain non-storm water from a small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System. -Discharges of water pollutants into State surface waters. Examples of these discharges include, but are not limited to,cooling water, hydrotesting waters, dewatering effluent, and process wastewater. -Discharges from the application of pesticides (including pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, and various other substances to control pest) to State waters. An application for an NPDES individual permit must be submitted at least 180 calendar days before the commencement of the discharge or start of construction Zendo Kern March 8, 2021 Page 3 of 4 activities. To request and NPDES individual permit, you must complete and submit the NPDES individual permit application. This application is available on the e-Permitting Portal website located at: A Notice of Intent(NOI) for coverage under a specific NPDES general permit must be submitted at least 30 calendar days before the commencement of the discharge or start of construction activities. To request NPDES general permit coverage, you must complete and submit the NOI. The NOI is available on the e-Permitting Portal website located at: Ill t ,,:11111,1-t'It)Lill.tloh.hakk i1._7 %I�q���'nil�l, Please see HAR.. Chapter 11-55 for more information on the NPDES individual permit and NPDES general permits. The specific NPDES general permits located in HAR, Chapter 11-55, Appendices B through M. HAR, Chapter 11-5 5 and HAR, Chapter 1 1-55, Appendices B through M are available on the CWB website at: h E V� + • According to State law, all discharges related to the project construction or operation activities, whether or not NPDES permit coverage and/or Section 401 WQC are required, must comply with the State's Water Quality Standards. Monitoring • Effluent discharge and/or receiving water monitoring may be required as conditions of Section 401 Water Quality Certifications and NPDES General and Individual permits. Enforcement ■ Noncompliance with water quality requirements contained in HAR. Chapter 11-54 and/or permitting requirements specified in HAR, Chapter 11-55 may be subject to penalties of$25,000 per day per violation. ■ Violations of Hawaii Revised Statutes 342D and 342E may elicit administrative, civil and criminal penalties for such violations. Polluted Runoff Control • Manage projects identified in watershed-based plans that reduce polluted runoff and educate the public about nonpoint source pollution. Projects are selected through an annual request for proposals. Funding is provided by the EPA through the Clean Water Act. For more information on projects and funding opportunities, please visit: ,k,l ,k .Iia%%Aiy�_,t-k/d hi I(itcdi'LlI10f iii ru l'i i. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Joanne Seto, Supervisor of the Engineering Section, CWB, at (808) 586-4309. Zendo Kern March 8, 2021 Page 4 of 4 Construction activities must comply with the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapter 11-46, "Community Noise Control." 1. The contractor must obtain a noise permit if the noise levels from the construction activities are expected to exceed the allowable levels of the rules. 2. Construction equipment and on-site vehicles requiring an exhaust of gas or air must be equipped with mufflers. 3. The contractor must comply with the requirements pertaining to construction activities as specified in the rules and the conditions issued with the permit. Should there be any questions on this matter, please contact the Department of Health at 933- 0917. We recommend that you review all of the Standard Comments on our website: Iotw.l II;IG�:Ii /it Lal11ilCIIrt -plJIM l _"I:li1LfutieiAny comments specifically applicable to this project should be adhered to. The same website also features a Healthy Community Design Smart Growth Checklist (Checklist) created by Built Environment Working GroupB{ EWG) of the Hawaii State Department of Health. The BEWG recommends that state and county planning departments, developers, planners,engineers and other interested parties apply the healthy built environment principles in the Checklist whenever they plan or review new developments or redevelopments projects. We also ask you to share this list with others to increase community awareness on healthy community design. _ SUZANNE O.CASE ._y (ILAIRPFRSON DAN 11)Y.ICE t�•..�'••'••-•.-A 4 ROARDOE'EAI.'11ANDNAILRAL RI:SIRIRCFS GOVERNOROF I(AWAIT �P•e%959 e'•,Y FIINb1KSION(1N WAIIR WSOI!RCI:GIANA(iF\1EN[ ,'Nr• 's r aa' ,sROBERT K.AIASUDA FIRST I'M" midIV AI- ALEO AWNUEL )EPIrIY DIRECRIR-WAIFR I:A0UATMRISI/E CROS IR)rAIINGAMl11(TA.YRF.CRI.A111AV BUREAUOFCONVEYAWES -- COMA(DSI()N ON WAnR RI>I111E(I'F.\L%NMiI'\7FN1 CONSERVATION ANDCOASTAL L/WDS STATE OF HAWAII C1k SEl(\'nnON AND RESOURCES IIFORCE\�M Flt(',LN'I}RIN(i R)RFSTRY AND WTI DL IEE S,are ofHe+1°" DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES KAII(1OLA EISLAM RESEERVECO OSR1N LAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STAFF PARKS KAKUIIIIIEWA BUILDING 601 KAMOKILA BLVD,STE 555 January 15, 2021 KAPOLEI, HAWAII 96707 IN REPLY REFER TO: Tracie-Lee Camero Project No. 2020PR00010 County of Hawaii —Planning Department Doc.No. 2101 SNI I 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo, HI 96720 tracie-lee.camero(d hawai icounty.aov Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review State Land Use Boundary Amendment Application for Hale Ola O htohouli COR-20-136782-Hawai`i Island Community Development Corp. Wainkea Ahupua`a,South Hilo District, Island of Haw•ai`i TNIK:(3)2-4-001:168 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the subject County of Hawaii State Land Use Boundary Amendment application received by our office on January 6, 2021. The submittal included a site map,the State Land Use(SLU)Boundary Amendment Application,a Department of Planning letter, and photos of the proposed project area.The project area consists of the entire 9.09-acre parcel. The applicant, Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC), is requesting a State Land Use District Boundary amendment to change the SLU designation from Agriculture (A-1 a) to Urban (RM-4). HICDC intends to develop the site as a "Pocket Neighborhood" development with small-scale residential units surrounding common areas. Our records indicate that this project area has been subject to an archaeological inventory survey(AIS). No historic properties were identified during the AIS and the negative findings were presented in an archaeological assessment (AA) report (Haun 2008). SHPD accepted the Haun (2008) AA report in a letter dated May 11, 2016 (Log No. 2008.5033, Doc. No. 0811MD24). The proposed project area has been subject to previous grubbing and grading permit reviews, resulting in determinations of no historic properties affected (e.g., Log No. 2014.05227, Doc. No. 1412SN02;Log No. 2015.03678,Doc. No. 1511 SN04).The SHPD has no new information or records of any known significant historic properties within or near the proposed project area. Based on the information provided above, the SHPD has no objections to the proposed amendment to the SLU boundary application (COR-20-136782). However, SHPD requests the opportunity to review future permit applications involving ground disturbing activities. Please contact Sean Naleimaile at (808)933-7651 or at sean.p.naleimaile(d—,hawaii.Qov for any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha, 1l7h 16_�2141#91_ Alan S.Downer,PhD Administrator,State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc: County of Hawaii Planning Department,plannina�:hawaiicounty.Qov Plion ing Depi Keith Kato-HICDC,keith.hicdcCaQmail.corn Exhibit- 10 A St ZANNED.CASE CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y.IGE ,,° ti9sa GOVERNOR RAV9A0 BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES _ COMMISSION ON NATER RESOURCE " l MANAGEMENT L f � ey 3SIr+1` *s�j-xiid' 6 y STATE OF HAWAII CGH PLP.NNM ; 0EP DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES JAN 1.9— 242 1 H>ai1:57 LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 January 19, 2021 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Tracie-Lee Camero via email: tracie-lee.camero(@hawaiicounty.gov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development located at Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated December 29, 2020 and January 7, 2021, enclosed are comments from the Division of Forestry & Wildlife on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura(a�hawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell Tsuj,i Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files Plcnning Dep;. Exhibit— 'I'I 1 :� 932i SL 71%%y E.31.C:10 F DAVIL}Y.IGf .� ..a■ *�' CI AIRPF.R1,ON GOVERNOR OF HAWAII w Ha LRD OF i.:LY 1i VNo N 11 RLI.RFS01 AtS 111.11VIh SIGN ilh q%TF.R RFlLR'X(F i l 11LL 1C.L1fEN! ti STATE OF HAWAII :-. 13EPARTMEN 10 F LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES L%Nll DIVISION 1105 I 0I I K 1:BOX 621 1[ON[]I.L:I.I .€1.NWA I1 91809 December 7, 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencles: _Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div. of Boating 8L Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGR(d�hawaii.gov} X Div. of Forestry &Wildlife (rubyrosa.t.terraclo655hawaii.gov) —Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management(D.NR.CWRM(o-)-hawaii.go _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division – Hawaii District (gordon.c,heit0)hawaii.goy} Historic Preservation FROM: Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator R'U55,911 Tsuji SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLID 20-000054)- Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban -Proposed Hale ala 0 Mohouli Affordable Residential Development LOCATION: Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 APPLICANT: County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter which can be found at: https:l/hawailolmt- m _share oint.coml:f:l 1 ersonalldarlene k nakamura hawaii ov1EvlAw- Py4Jd0y9wx5psJU-gB3iDQb9Ni Tu5aTzczNorPw?e=fYTJdT Please submit comments by December 28, 2020. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at darlene.k.nakamura()hawaii,gov. Thank you. { } We have no objections. ( } We have no comments. (�} Comments are attached. Signed: 00A Print Name: DAVID G. SMITH, Administrator Division: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Date: Jan 13,2021 Attachments/cc. Central Files S[24NNE 0,CASE F y HAINYE'[u[ml RAV 1]]}`,IE •^wily{y IR]A RfIOp l.A1111 AN[1NAT[gNl RNR+A.I%TS iii VPRNA 514 l l!'I IAWAII ..( ¢1959 ,MMIN Rt*t1k WA I L•k itEvA+RCL NANAL% UMI f - = i RGSLXT JIL MASUDA -r nr.A QTS M.ILA LEA NL{NUEL J •�r� �" IIFN RY IflN6l'roM-1L.11]'R •�{ Illf&FAIT 11 Ll]NVLYATICE:S STATE OF HAWAII L1 A1MI4%IIlN 0VWATFRRF.%Ili k�FMANMWMFH! + n3,4,[L AI lrll+AYh cch wrAi lAxtis llknP• y A*5V5tVATILni A Nh NEl�IV rNC�$};NFl/Rr'El.AkN'I DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES twl7iLLRWG DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE 4IM ur PRE"IWAriin4 1 5] PUNCI IBOWL STREET,ROOM 325 KAIN"I'k WC.IKi AN[]iti51'RVr U44AMISSJON IANI i HONOLULU,HAWAII 46813 5TArrrAWKs January 12.2021 MEMORANDUM Log no. 2967 TO: RUSSELL Y. TSUJI_ Administrator Land Division FROM: DAVID G. SMITH, Administrator Division of Forestry and Wildlife SUBJECT: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Comments for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)—Request to Change from Agriculture to Urhan --Proposed Hale Ula o Mohouli Affordable Residential Development The Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife(DOFAW)has received your inquiry regarding the state land use boundary amendment for the proposed Hale Ola o Mohouli in Hilo on the Island of Hawaii, TMk: (3) 2-4-001:168. The proposed project consists of expanding the existing senior residences by constructing, up to 90 additional affordable residential units, The State listed Hawaiian Hawk or`Io (Barco solirarins) is known to occur in the project vicinity, DOFAW recommends surveying the area to ensure no Hawaiian Hawk nests are present if trees are to be cut, 'lo nests might be present during the breeding season from March to September. The State Iisted Hawaiian Hoary Bat or `Ope-ape-a (La,sirrrus cinercus semotrrs) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. If any site clearing is required this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June I through September 15). If this cannot be avoided, woody plants greater than 15 feet (4.6 meters) tall should not be disturbed, removed. or trimmed without consulting DO FA W. To prevent the spread of Rapid 'Ohi`a Death (ROD), if `ohi'a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: lett s i1cm5.ttahr.hastiaii.rLiulrr�d, DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites,such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens(e.g. Rapid `Ohi'a Death), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants),or invasive plant harts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at (808) 933-3340 in planning, design. and construction of the project to learn of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Gear that may contain soil,such as work boots and vehicles,should be thoroughly cleaned with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevem the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death and ether harmful fungal pathogens. We note that artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night by causing disorientation. This disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that might be required, DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open sea. For illustrations and guidance related to seabird-friendly light styles that also protect the dark, starry skies of Hawaii please visit: littps:Ilcllnr.hawaii.gov/"iIdIifel FttIes/2016103)/DOC4 39.pdf. We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. Should the scope of the project change significantly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted,please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact Koa Matsuoka. Protected Species Habitat Conservation Planning Associate at(808) 587-4149 or k��a.n�ntauul:a�r lia�vaii.�ov. Sincerely, 00A DAVID G. SMITH Administrator _ SUZANNE^CASE o^vo�mm a / '"", ^�� CHAIRPERSON m°"ov,ux ^ n�'w�v�v,,c� ""�"="�"*�" ,w/vwvIONvxvmvRRFSOUR('E "^x^v,°mr STATE OF H/kW/kIX mmp�eTx�mmToF |.AND AND NATURAL emyo//ecmy LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX a/ xowoux.o'HAWAII vumv December 29. 2O2O County ofHawaii Planning Department At n: N4o. Tracie-LeeCannero via email: 101 Pauahi Gtveet, Suite Hilo, Hawaii 98720 Dear Ms. Canmero: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (GLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola 0 0Nmhmu|i Affordable Residential Development located at N/aiakea. South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TN � (3) 2-4-001:188 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment onthe subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR'o Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are oonnnnento from the (a) Engineering Division and (b) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: Thank you. Ginoena|y. / Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures SF O P ry+ Sl/../+itiE U.C"ASF. DAVID Y.IGE to lo7y�- [TiAfNPE1LSOV Gu'lERunR❑C wLVJ4u .' NOARU Oi{_%b.A'NO NATM1L NESO I'RC E.S !� CO%11.1 RS 10,(A%A AT£R RESOI RCE 11.AtiACk}IE%T 5Ii f n STATE OF HAWAII Il@:t'.MUNIFNI OF LAND:VST NXR-RAS.RESOURCES LVIN D DIVISION Pr)5T 0HI C F R()X 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 December 7, 2020 MEMORANDUM T9: ❑LHR Agencies: Div. of Aquatic Resources —Div.of Boating &Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR,ENGR(@hawaii.gov) X Div.of Forestry& Wildlife (rubyrosa.t.terrago6�hqwaii_gov) _Div.of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRMC5)hawak.gov) _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division - Hawaii District(gordon.c.heit(cDhawaii.goy_] Historic Preservation Russell Tse91 fR$hl Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola D Mohouli Affordable Residential development LOCATION: Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3)2-4-001:168 APPLICANT: County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter which can be found at: https:llhawaiioimt- my.sharepoint.com/:f:lglpersonal/dariene k nakamura hawaij _gov/EvlA_w- Py4JdOy9wx5psJU-gB3'Dgb9 N i_Tu5aTzczNorPw?e=fYTJdT Please submit comments by December 28, 2020. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at darlene.k.nakamura@hawaii.gov. Thank you. { J We have no objections. { ] We have no comments. (V ) Comments are attached. Signed: �7_ Print Name: Carty S. Chang, Chief Engineer Division: Engineering Division Date. Dec 23,2020 Attachments/cc: Central Files DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y. Tsuji Ref: State Lancs Use Soundan, Amendment(SLU 20-0000-54) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development Location: Waiakea, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii TNI K(s): (3)2-4-001:158 Applicant: County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations(44CFR).are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area (high risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 44CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 44CFR reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flared ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFiP standards. flee owner of the project properly and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Irene designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones are designated on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (THAT) (http://gis.liawaiint7tp.org/Fl4AI'). If there arc questions regarding the local flood ordinances. please contact the applicable County NF1?coordinating agency below: a Oahu: City and County of Honolulu. Department of Planning and Permitting (808) 768-8098. G Ila%Uii Island: County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works(808)961-8327- o NIaui/Molokai/Lanai County of Niaui. Depaitme«t of Planniizg(808) 270-72 3. ❑ Kauai: County of Kauai. Department of PL[b]iC Works(80 8) 241-4896. Signed: CARTY S. CHANG,CHIEF:ENGINEER Date: Dec 23, 2020 GAVIEP Y.IGE t*:�546a�•y` 471AIRl ESSON '.FHW4 rT il�YiIIf1A 101 OF 1ANO AAD%A R RAL RFSOVRC'ES Cf7�15f ISSIf7\tl�WATER RF_SOI N F VANAUMY `yw anLf r}7 STATE OF HAWAII DFPARTIMLN 01 LAND AND NATURAL RESOLIR(:F:S LANA)MVISION 1105-1"OFFICE HOX 621 HONOLUU I,I IAWA 11 96809 December 7. 2020 MEMORANDUM TO: DLNR Agencies: _Div. of Aquatic Resources _Div. of Boating&Ocean Recreation 7C Engineering Division QLNR.ENGR howaii. ov) X Div,of Forestry&Wildlife(rubyrosa.t.terrago@hawaii.gov} _Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management(DLNR.CWRM@hawaii.gov} _Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division—Hawaii District(aordon.c.heit0hawaii.aov) Historic Preservation FROM: Russell Y.Tsuji, Land Administrator Russell rsujr SUBJECT. State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)- Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban-Proposed Hale Ota O Mohoull Affordable Residential Development LOCATION. Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii;TMI{: (3)2-4-001:168 APP_ICANT; County of Hawaii, Department of Planning on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation (HICDC) Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter which cqn he found at; https://h a wa i ioir nt- mY.share[point.coml/f:/g/i)ersonal/darlene k nakamura hawaii govlEvlAw- v4Jd0v9wx5 sJU- B30D b9Ni TuSaTzczNorPw?e=fYTJdT Please submit comments by December 28,2020. If no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at darfene.k.nakamura _,hawa_iJ,gov. Thank you. { We have no objections. { } We have no comments. ( ) Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: Division: Date: Z I Attachments/cc: Central Files SUZANNE D.CASE DAVID Y.IGE >i ,vsyT CDAIRPF.RSON BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES GOVERNOR OF HAV9A0 n! COIINUSSION ON W%TER RESOURCE k`•j 1E`. MANAGEMENT- ANAMENT 4 -F 1 STATE OF HAWAII sr4re 8.N' D' EPARTIMEN'T OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OF'F'ICE BOX 621 HONOLULU,HAWAII 96809 January 7, 2021 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Ms. Tracie-Lee Camero via email: tracie-lee.camero@hawaiicounty.aov 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Dear Ms. Camero: SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment (SLU 20-000054) - Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban - Proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development located at Waiakea, South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-001:168 on behalf of Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated December 29, 2020, enclosed are comments from the Commission on Water Resource Management on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura(c�hawaii.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Ru"O& 7"sr yi" Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Files Planning Depa. Exhibit_ 13 DAVID Y.IGE VJ 5U7ANNE O.CASE KAMANA REAMER,PHO- _ MICHAEL G.SUCK ELIZABETH A.CHAR.M-O. i NEIL J.HANNAHS WAYNE K.KATAYAMA PAUL)-MEYER STATE OF HAWAII M-KALEo SEA C-1 L DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P.D.sox 621 HONOLULU.HAWAII 96809 January 7,2021 REF; RFD.5539.8 TO! Mr. Russell Tsuji,Administrator Land Division FROM: M.Kaleo Manuel,Deputv Director Commission on Water Resource Management SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)-Request to Change from Agriculture to Urban-Proposed Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Residential Development FILE NO.: RFD.5539.8 TMK NO.-. (3)2-4-001:168 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The Commission on Water Resource Management(CWRM)is the agency responsible for administering the State Water Code(Cade). Under the Code,all waters of the State are held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the Stale,therefore all water use is subject to legally protected water rights. CWRM strongly promotes the efficient use of Hawaii's water resources through conservation measures and appropriate resource management. For more information, please refer to the State Water Code,Chapter 174C,Hawaii Revised Statutes,and Hawaii Administrative Rules, Chapters 13-187 to 13-471. These documents are available via the Internet at htto://dinr.hawaii.00v/cwr_m_. Our comments related to water resources are checked off below. 4. We recommend coordination with the county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and Development Plan. Please ccntact the respective Planning Department and/or Department of Water Supply for further information. 2. We recommend coordination with the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Prajects Plan. 3. We recommend coordination with the Hawaii Department of Agriculture(H DOA)to incorporate the reclassification of agricultural zoned land and the redistribution of agricultural resources into the State's Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan(AWUDP). Please contact the HDOA for more information. 4_ We recommend that water efficient fixtures be installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the development tc reduce the increased demand on the area's freshwater resources. Reducing the water usage of a home or building may earn credit towards Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEER)certification, More information on LEED certification is available at http:llwww.usgbc.org/leed. A listing of fixtures certified by the EAP as having high water efficiency can be found at http://www.epa.gov/watersense- 0 5. We recommend the use of best management practices(BMP)for stormwater management to minimize the impact of the project to the existing area's hydrology while maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Stormwater management BMPs may earn credit toward LEED certification. More information on stormwater BMPs can be found at http://planning.hawa[i.gov/czm/i nit!at ives/low-impact-d eve topmentl RI 6. We recommend the use of alternative water sources,wherever practicable. 7. We recommend participating in the Hawaii Green Business Program,that assists and recognizes businesses that strive to operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.The program description can be found online at http://energy.hawaii,gov/green-business-program, $. We recommend adopting landscape irrigation conservation best management practices endorsed by the Landscape Industry Council of Hawaii.These practices can be found online at Mr.Russell Tsuji Page 2 January 7,2021 http://www.hawaiiscape.comiwp-content/u ploads/2013/04/LICH_Irrigation_Conservation_BMPs.pdf. 9. There may be the potential for ground or surface water degradation/contamination and recommend that approvals for this project be conditioned upon a review by the State Department of Health and the developer's acceptance of any resulting requirements related to water quality. 10 The proposed water supply source for the project is located In a designated water management area,and a Water Use Permit is required prior to use of water. The Water Use Permit may be conditioned on the requirement to use dual line water supply systems for new industrial and commercial developments. ❑ 11 A Well Construction Permit(s)is(are)are required before the ccmmencement of any well construction work. ❑ 12 A Pump Installation Permit(s)is(are)required before ground water is developed as a source of supply for the project. 13 There is(are)well located or.or adjacent to this project. If wells are not planned to be used and will be affected by any new construction,they must be properly abandoned and sealed. A permit far well abandonment must be obtained. 14 Ground-water withdrawals from this project may affect streamflows,which may require an instream flow standard amendment. 15 A Stream Channel Alteration Permit(s)is(are)required before any alteration can be made to the bed and/or banks of a steam channel. 16 A Stream Diversion Works Permit(s)Is(are)required before any stream diversion works is constructed or altered. El17 A Petition to Amend the Interim instream Flow Standard is requ red for any new or expanded diversion(s) of surface water. 18 The planned source of water for this project has not been identified in this report. Therefore,we cannot determine what permits or petitions are required from our office,or whether there are potential impacts to water resources. OTHER: Planning-The State Water Code requires each county to update its water use and development plans as necessary to maintain consistency with its zoning and land use policies(§17401 HRS), Should a change in zoning be approved for this project, please coordinate with the respective Planning Department and/or Department of Water Supply to incorporate this project into the county water use and development plan. The proposed water sources)and projected water demands for the project,both potable and non- potable,should be identified and the calculations used to estimate demands should be provided. A discussion of the potential impacts on water resources and other public trust uses of water should be included,and any proposed mitigation measures described. Water conservation and efficiency measures to be implemented should also be discussed. If you have any questions,please contact Lenore Ohye of the Commission staff at 587-0216. �p¢ 'I R►ACL: Un'ted Slates Department of the Interior _ I \ND �1 II iSIt ICT s. Pacific l,Jaiid, t:i;ll and L1 ild(Ife 01li c: 300 \la �loana I3uul<<ard. Rooin 3-122 Ilonolulu, Ilawai-i 96850 In Rely Refer To: December 23, 2020 011:1'11:00-202 1-St.-O I I I Mr. Michael Yee Director, Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Technical Assistance for proposed State Land Use Boundary Amendment(SLU 20-000054)of TMK (3) 2-4-001:168, Hale Ola O Mohouli Affordable Housing Project, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Mr. Yee: Thank you for your recent correspondence requesting technical assistance on species biology, habitat, or life requisite requirements. The Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office(PIFWO) of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(Service) appreciates your efforts to avoid or minimize effects to protected species associated with your proposed actions. We provide the following information for your consideration under the authorities of the Endangered Species Act(ESA) of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et.seg.),as amended. Due to significant workload constraints, PIFWO is currently unable to specifically address your information request. The table below lists the protected species most likely to be encountered by projects implemented within the Hawaiian Islands. Based on your project location and description, we have noted the species most likely to occur within the vicinity of the project area, in the "Occurs In or Near Project Area"column. Please note this list is not comprehensive and should only be used for general guidance. We have added to the PIFWO website, located at htti2s://www.flvs.Dov/r)acificislands/promo.cfm`?id=177175840 where you can find recommended conservation measures intended to avoid or minimize adverse effects to these federally protected species and best management practices to minimize and avoid sedimentation and erosion impacts to water quality. If you or the project proponent are representing a federal action agency, please use the official species list on our web-site for your section 7 consultation. You can find out if your project occurs in or near designated critical habitat here: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/. INTERIOR REGION 9 INTERIOR REGION 12 COLUMBIA—PACIFIC NORTHWEST PACIFIC ISLANDS IDAHO MONTANA OREGON' WASHINGTON AMFRICAN SAMOA. GUAM. HAWAII, NORTHFRN •rARTIAI- MARIANA ISLANDS PIcnning Depi. Exhibit __ 14 Mr. Michael Yee 2 Under section 7 of the ESA, it is the Federal agency's (or their non-Federal designee) responsibility to make the determination of whether or not the proposed project"may affect" federally listed species or designated critical habitat. A "may affect,not likely to adversely affect" determination is appropriate when effects to federally listed species are expected to be discountable (i.e., unlikely to occur), insignificant(minimal in size), or completely beneficial. This conclusion requires written concurrence from the Service. If a"may affect, likely to adversely affect"determination is made.then the Federal agency must initiate formal consultation with the Service. Projects that are determined to have"no effect" on federally listed species and/or critical habitat do not require additional coordination or consultation. Implementing the avoidance, minimization, or conservation measures for the species that may occur in your project area will nomia]l_y enable you to make a"may affect, not likely to adversely affect"determination for your project. If it is determined that the proposed project may affect federally listed species, we recommend you contact our office early in the planning process so that we may assist you with the ESA compliance. If the proposed project is funded, authorized, or permitted by a Federal agency,then that agency should consult with us pursuant to section 7(a)(2)of the ESA. If no Federal agency is involved with the proposed project, the applicant should apply for an incidental take permit under section 10(a)(1)(13)of the ESA. A section 14 permit application must include a habitat conservation plan that identities the effects of the action on listed species, species habitats, and defines measures to minimize and mitigate those adverse effects. We appreciate your efforts to conserve endangered species. We regret that we cannot provide you with more specific protected species information for your project site. If you have questions that are not answered by the information on our website, you can contact PIFWO at(808) 792- 9400 or pifwo_admin[aJfws.gov and ask to speak to the lead biologist for the island where your project is located. Sincercly. Digitally signed by DIANE DIANE SETHER SETHER 134;s6-n�oo, Island Team Manager Pacific islands Fish and Wildlife Office Mr. Michael Yee 3 The table below lists the protected species most likely to be encountered by projects implemented within the Hawaiian Islands. For your guidance, we have marked species that may occur in the vicinity of your project;this list is not comprehensive and should only be used for general guidance. Scientific Name Common Name 1 Federal May Occur Hawaiian Name Status In Project Area Mammals Lasiuriis einereus semottis Hawaiian hoary bat/ E 1�X `o e`a e`a Reptiles Chelonia myda.s Green sea turtle/honu T ❑ - Central North Pacific distinct population segment Erectrnochelvs imbricate Hawksbill sea turtle/ E ❑ Honu `ea Birds Anas vvvvillianu Hawaiian duck/ E ❑ koioa Branta.sandvicensis Hawaiian goose/ T nene Fidica alai Hawaiian coot/ E `alae kea Gallintrla galeata Hawaiian gallinule/ E ❑ sandviccnsis alae 'ula Himanropus rnexicanus Hawaiian stilt/ E knudseni Ae'o Oceanodroma Castro Hawaii distinct population E segment band-rumped storm-petrel/ 'ake'ake Pterodroma sandtivichensis Hawaiian petrel/ 'ua`u E 51 Puff ntrs auricularis newelli Newell's shearwater/ T `a`o Ardenija pacificus Wedge-tailed Shearwater/ MBTA ❑ `ua'u karu Ruteo solitarius Hawaiian hawk/ MBTA `io Gvgis alba White Tern/ MBTA ❑ manu-o-ku Insects Manduca blackburni Blackburn's sphinx moth E Megalagrion pacificum Pacific Hawaiian Damselfly E ❑ M.xanthomelas Orangeblack Hawaiian E ❑ Damseltl Mr. Michael Yee 4 M. nigrohmnatum Blackline Hawaiian E ❑ ni rolineuhan Damselfly Plants Scientific Name Common Name Federal Locations May or Status Occur In Hawaiian Name Project Area Abutilon menziesii Ko`olowula E 0, L, M, H ❑ Aehyranthes splendens `Ewa hinahina E 0 ❑ gar. rotundata Bonamia inenziesii No common name E K, 0,L, M, H ❑ Canavalia pubescens 'Awikiwiki E Ni, K, L, M ❑ C ohibrina oppasitrfolia Kauila E 0, M, H ❑ Cvperus trachysanthm Pu`uka'a E K, 0 ❑ Goteania hillehraradii No common name E Mo, M ❑ Hibiscus brackenridgei Ma`o hau hele E 0, Mo, L, M, H ❑ Ischaetnum bvrone Hilo ischaemum E K, 0,Mo, M, H ❑ hwdendrion pyrilalium Wahine noho kula E 0, H ❑ Marsilera villo.sa Ihi,ihi E Ni,0, Mo ❑ Mezoneuron kavaiense Uhiuhi E 0, H ❑ Nothocestrutn breviflorum `Aiea E H ❑ Panicum finaki var. Carter's E Molokini Islet(0), ❑ carteri pamcgrass Mo Panicurn niihauense Lau'chu E K ❑ Pezrcedanaim sandwicense Makou E K, 0, Mo, M ❑ Pleomele (Chrysodracon) Halapepe E H ❑ hawaiien.si.s Portulaca sclerocarpa -Ilii E L, H ❑ Portulaca villosa 11hi E Le, Ka,Ni, 0, Mo, ❑ M, L, H,N ihoa Pritchardia i f tnis Loulu E H ❑ inaideniana) Pseudognaphulium `Ena`ena E Mo, M ❑ sandivicenshim var. molokaiense Scaevola coriacea Dwarf naupaka E Mo, M ❑ Schenkia(Centaurium) 'Awiwi E K, 0, Mo, L, M ❑ sebaeoides Sesbania tomentosa 'Ohai E Ni, Ka, K,0,Mo, M, ❑ L, H,Necker, Nihoa Tetranrolopium rockii No common name T Mo ❑ Mr. Michael Yee 5 Figna o-wizhuensis No conunon name E Mo, M, L, H, Ka ❑ Location key: 0=0`ahu, K=Kauai, M=Maui, H=Hawaii Island, L=Lanai, Mo=Molokai, Ka=Kahn'olawe,N i=Niihau,Le=Lehu:i