Laserfiche WebLink
B. Affect on Surrounding Properties <br /> 46. Based upon the testimony from surrounding and neighboring <br /> property owners, the Development will have an adverse effect on <br /> surrounding properties by creating noise, traffic, and impacting the quality <br /> of life of the adjoining residents. <br /> 47. Measures proposed by Connections, regarding the establishment <br /> of building setbacks and roadway improvements to Edita Street do not <br /> appear to be sufficient to mitigate the overwhelming concerns raised by <br /> surrounding property owners. <br /> C. Burden on Public Agencies to Provide Services <br /> 48. There is insufficient water available from the county system to <br /> service the Development. Therefore, to allow the Development would <br /> unreasonably burden the Department of Water Supply to provide water for its <br /> facilities. <br /> 49. There is no evidence that Connections has the ability to develop a <br /> potable water source as a mitigating measure, previously proposed by the <br /> Director. <br /> 50. A mitigating measure previously proposed by the Director of <br /> limiting the number of students to the amount of potable water available to <br /> the project is not reasonable because Connections is proposing to construct a <br /> high school for 107 students it first phase, when the potable water available would <br /> only allow for 70 students. <br /> 51. As such, the proposed use may unreasonably burden the County <br /> Department of Water Supply to provide water to the Development <br /> (Emphasis added) <br /> RA: part I, 74-75. <br /> Appellant objected to these alleged errors in its April 21, 2014, Joint Exceptions to <br /> Hearings Officers [sic] Report Finding of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation Dated <br /> April 7,2014. RA: part III, 292958-2959; 2958-2963. <br /> D. Unusual Conditions, Trends and Needs <br /> 52. Unusual conditions and needs have arisen since the establishment of <br /> this land use district in the 1970s, because the area in which the Property is <br /> located has essentially become residential in character. Also the County General <br /> Plan LUPAG map recognizes this trend by designating the area for low density <br /> urban use. However, there was no evidence presented to demonstrate that <br /> 8 <br />