Laserfiche WebLink
water resources. Nor, has Connections demonstrated how the development of <br /> a regional charter school on the Property that does not specifically service <br /> the needs the immediate community and this is overwhelmingly objected to <br /> by the immediate community is a reasonable site for this facility. In addition, <br /> Connections has not demonstrated that the Development meets most of the <br /> criteria to be considered by the Commission in the subject application. <br /> (Emphasis added) <br /> RA: part I, 76-77. <br /> Appellant objected to this alleged error in its April 21, 2014,Joint Exceptions to Hearings <br /> Officers [sic] Report Finding of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation Dated April 7, <br /> 2014. RA: part III, 2966-2967. See also. Sec. 91-14(8)(5), HRS;Aluminum Shake Roofing, Inc. <br /> v. Hirayascr, 110 Hawai'i 248, 252, 131 P.3d 1230, 1234 (2006); Del Monte Fresh Produce <br /> (Hawaii), Inc. v. Intl Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 142, AFL-CID, 112 Hawaii 489, <br /> 499, 146 P.3d 1066, 1076 (2006) <br /> IV. <br /> STANDARD OF REVIEW <br /> Generally, appeals of an administrative agency decision is secondary appeal and the court <br /> applies the standards of Sec. 91-14(g), HRS, to determine if the trial court's decision was right or <br /> wrong: <br /> §91-14 Judicial review of contested cases. <br /> (g) Upon review of the record the court may affirm the decision of the agency or <br /> remand the case with instructions for further proceedings; or it may reverse or <br /> modify the decision and order if the substantial rights of the petitioners may have <br /> been prejudiced because the administrative findings,conclusions, decisions, or <br /> orders are: <br /> (1) In violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; or <br /> (2) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or <br /> (3) Made upon unlawful procedure; or <br /> (4) Affected by other error of law; or <br /> (5) Clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative, and substantial <br /> evidence on the whole record; or <br /> (6) Arbitrary, or capricious, or characterized by abuse of discretion or <br /> clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion. (Emphasis added) <br /> 11 <br />