My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-09-23 Redistricting Commission minutes (3rd Session)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021-09-23 Redistricting Commission minutes (3rd Session)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2022 10:16:09 AM
Creation date
11/2/2021 3:53:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Ms. Sumera-Lee. Okay, moving over to Item 3. Mr. Kauka. <br /> <br /> KAUKA: Thank you. Unfinished business: <br /> <br />3. Further review of the proposed timeline for the Commission to complete its work. The <br />Commission may revisit the timeline to explore and discuss options for extending <br />deadines if necessary. <br /> <br />KOSSOW: Thank you. Do we have any discussion? Mr. Lopez. <br /> <br />LOPEZ: It’s my proposal that we try to extend at least 30 days, to the end of January. I <br />recognize the issue we run up against in February with the pulling of nominations, things <br />of that nature. We do have a lot of traction. I’ve used the tool. I’m not quite comfortable <br />with it. I have a lot of questions with some technical resource but, working independently <br />on that, I think I can get to where I need to get to. The issue in the timeline is the <br />compressed time for the various district meetings, very soon. I don’t know how much <br />anybody will be ready to present or discuss any plans with the public at those meetings. <br />My suggestion is we run out 30 days and then work backward from that and establish a <br />new timeline. Not a motion, just a consideration for discussion. Thank you. <br /> <br />YOSHINA: I second that. <br /> <br />KOSSOW: Any further discussion for Item 3? Ms. Lui. <br /> <br />LUI: Commissioner Lopez said he wasn’t making a motion, but it was seconded. I’ll turn <br />it into a motion if that’s okay with Mr. Lopez and he can make it himself if he would like. <br /> <br />LOPEZ: Oh no. That’s perfectly fine with me. I was hoping to get more discussion from <br />the Commissioners on maybe their opinions as to do we need to extend or not extend? <br />That consideration for me, continue to work on this timeline until such time as we do get <br />some relief, if we do, because we may not. No, the motion that you made is fine. Thank <br />you. <br /> <br />KOSSOW: Ms. Lui. <br /> <br />LUI: I do agree with it because I think if you were a community member, you might have <br />some issues in advance but you probably also want to just get a little bit of sense of what <br />changes could happen, even if they’re not a concrete proposed plan. Rather than just <br />having the Commission sit there and listen, although that’s the main goal, I’m sure that <br />people would also want to hear from the Commission. <br /> <br />KOSSOW: Ms. Lui, would you mind articulating your motion? <br /> <br />LUI: The motion was that we extend to the end of January, our timeline, that we finish by <br />the end of January. That’s the gist of it. The rationale is really to make sure that the <br />district meetings happen as positive and timely a way as possible. <br /> 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.