My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-12 Redistricting Commission Agenda Packet
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2021-11-12 Redistricting Commission Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2021 3:48:28 PM
Creation date
11/5/2021 3:48:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MELLON-LACEY: Mr. Chair? Mr. Chair, can you hear me? Sorry I had to come down <br /> here. I was trying to do this remotely, but my audio went out. I've missed a whole chunk <br /> here of what was going on. <br /> KOSSOW: Well you actually came in at perfect timing. <br /> MELLON-LACEY: When I walked in, I thought there was a motion on the floor. I'm not <br /> sure if we've ever acted on that motion. <br /> KOSSOW: There is currently a motion that's on the floor regarding to extend the <br /> timeline to the end of January. That's the current motion on the floor and there is a <br /> possible amendment, but it needs further discussion. <br /> MELLON-LACEY: So if I can just clarify a couple of points. One thing I want to be sure <br /> everybody is clear on is that, before you have a draft plan that this Commission has <br /> completed, you're supposed to have finished all of the initial public hearings in each <br /> district. When I look at this timeline, I think the September 9h through October 131' is <br /> kind of preliminary plan that people would be working on. I think the deadline that is <br /> kind of critical, is the deadline for the alternate plan for the public which we've given as <br /> October 14''. Their plans have to be finalized eight weeks prior to the final plan that this <br /> body produces. When we start doing the community hearings, it's not anticipated that <br /> you've locked into something and that's it. Because obviously, then you wouldn't be <br /> open to other people's input. The other thing, and I'm a little confused what you're <br /> asking, Mr. Akamu but, the Mayor can't give you the extension. The Council can't give <br /> you the extension because it's in the Charter. The purpose of sending a letter to the <br /> Mayor is really just to let him know. I've had preliminary discussions with the <br /> Corporation Counsel, Judge Strance, regarding this. What was communicated to me from <br /> my office is, people need to make an effort to try to meet this timeline because we <br /> couldn't go forward with something to change the deadline and can't show that we're <br /> actively trying to meet the deadline and a reason for the extension being necessary. So, if <br /> this body wants to extend the timeline, then I would have to have that discussion that <br /> you're requesting, Mr. Akamu, with Ms. Strance to determine what our office would do. <br /> It would probably be something like writ of mandamus that was provided because it's not <br /> something that the Mayor or the Council have the authority to give. It's in our Charter <br /> and to change the Charter is a monumental undertaking so it could never be completed <br /> prior to when this is due. It requires special action. I hope that helps. <br /> YOSHINA: This is Dwayne. <br /> KOSSOW: Mr. Yoshina. <br /> YOSHINA: Yes, thank you. So are you saying then that, assuming that everybody agrees, <br /> we'd have to go to the Supreme Court for this? <br /> MELLON-LACEY: Well, I think that we start with our local court. It has to be given by <br /> the court because it's our Charter. <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.