Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD BACKGROUND REPORT (PL-SLU-2021-001 and PL-REZ-2021-006) BKaupulehuSLUREZ.EC.11.2.21 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT KA`UPULEHU LAND LLC STATE LAND USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (PL-SLU-2021-000001) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (PL-REZ-2021-000006) KA`UPULEHU LAND LLC has submitted applications for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 2.653 acres of land and a Change of Zone from an Agricultural-5 acre (A-5a) zoning district to a Neighborhood Commercial-10,000 square feet (CN-10) and Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet(RS-10) zoning district for 5.349 acres of land. The subject property is located at 64-983 Mamalahoa Highway, approximately one mile east of its intersection with Kawaihae Road, Pu`ukapu Homesteads, South Kohala, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 6-4-024:027. PROPOSED ACTION 1. Applicants' Request: 1)A State Land Use Boundary Amendment from Agricultural to Urban for 2.653 acres of land; and 2) a Change of Zone from an Agricultural-5 acre (A-5a) zoning district to a Neighborhood Commercial-10,000 square feet(CN-10) and Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet(RS-10) zoning district for 5.349 acres of land. The CN-10 and the RS-10 zoning districts,both with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet, would allow a maximum density of twenty-three (23) lots. According to the Zoning Code,the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) zoning district applies to strategically located centers suitable for commercial activities which shall be of such size and shape as will accommodate a compact shopping center which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience basis. This district is distinguished from a central commercial district which provides general business and broad services to a city or region. Requirements for establishing a land use in the CN district, including a list of the variety of permitted uses, are shown in Section 25-5-100 to 25-5-108 of the Zoning Code. (Planning Department Exhibit 1-Zoning Code Requirements for Neighborhood Commercial Districts). The Single-Family Residential zoning district provides for lower or low and medium density residential use, -1- for urban and suburban family life. Requirements for establishing a land use in the RS district, including a list of the variety of permitted uses, are shown in Section 25-5-1 to 25-5-8 of the Zoning Code. (Planning Department Exhibit 2-Zoning Code Requirements for Single-Family Residential Districts) 2. Objectives of the Requests: If the requested land use entitlement changes are approved, the applicants propose to subdivide the property into a total of nine (9) lots,with a minimum size of 10,000 square feet each, consisting of three (3) commercial lots fronting Mamalahoa Highway and six (6)residential lots for the development of single-family residences and `ohana dwellings south of the commercial development. The commercial lots are anticipated to have three (3) 1 and 2-story mixed retail and commercial/office buildings, having a gross leasable floor area of approximately 18,600 square feet. 3. Construction Timetable and Cost: According to the applicant, a subdivision application would be filed approximately six (6) months after all land use entitlements approvals have been secured. The applicant would like to begin construction within six (6) months after issuance of all permit approvals. Full build out of the proposed Project is anticipated to be 2025. The estimated cost of improvements would be about $500,000 for the site work, paving, utilities, etc. and driveway related improvements necessary to serve the lots. 4. Landowner: Ka`upulehu Land LLC. 5. Supporting Information: The applicant has submitted the following in support of their request. (Planning Department Exhibit 3 - State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone Applications Dated June 30, 2021) PROPERTY PERNHT HISTORY 6. June 22, 1993: Effective date of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 93-65 which rezoned the subject property from an Agricultural 5-Acres (A-5a) zoning district to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN-7.5) zoning district for the northern half of the subject parcel closest to the highway. 7. September 12, 2012: Effective date of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02 10, which was initiated by the Planning Director to repeal Ordinance. No. 93 65 and reverted the previously CN zoned area back to the original A-5a zoning due to noncompliance with the conditions of approval. -2- STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 8. State Land Use Designation: Agricultural and Urban. 9. County Zoning: Agricultural-5 Acres (A-5a). 10. General Plan LUPAG Map: The subject property is divided in two by its LUPAG designations with the northern half of the parcel designated as Medium Density Urban and the southern half designated as Low Density Urban. Medium Density Urban allows for village and neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple family residential and related functions. Residential density may be up to 35 units per acre in multiple family residential developments. Low Density Urban allows for residential uses, with ancillary community and public uses. It also allows for neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses. The overall residential density may be up to 6 units per acre. 11. South Kohala Community Development Plan (SKCDP): The SKCDP was adopted by Ordinance No. 08 159 on December 1, 2008. The northern half of the property is located in an area designated for urban uses and the southern half of the property is located on the "Waimea Conceptual Plan" in an area designated for the "Small Farms and Ranches Preservation Program."The SKCDP envisions the development of an action program to acquire critical open space areas in east Waimea within this area. According to the SKCDP, the small farm and ranch lots in East Waimea are visually important to maintain the rural and paniolo character of Waimea. Strategy 2.1 of the SKCDP states "The County should carefully evaluate and condition, as appropriate, any rezoning that would negatively impact important agricultural lands or culturally, visually and environmentally important open spaces or resources in Waimea. "The SKCDP indicates that time will be needed to implement a number of important open space preservation tools and programs, and that while these tools and programs are being put into place, private lands that are currently zoned A-5a, A-10a, A-20a, or A-40a should retain their current zoning. Exceptions can be made for affordable housing, agricultural cluster subdivisions, and small-scale rezonings of 4 lots or less that may assist families in allowing their children to obtain individual properties. Finally, Strategy 2.4 of the SKCDP states, "Amend the County of Hawai`i General Plan L UPAG map by reducing the acreage ofLow-Density Urban land in Waimea Town. " -3- 12. Special Management Area (SMA): The property is located over eight(8)miles from the nearest shoreline and is not situated within the Special Management Area. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 13. Subject Property: The subject, 5.349-acre property is trapezoidal in shape, is fairly level with 0 to 3 percent slopes, and is currently improved with two (2)farm dwellings built in 1927 and 1928. The remainder of the property had been previously utilized for commercial truck crop farming for several decades. The property is currently covered with various grasses and is intermittently used for cattle grazing. The Lanimaumau Stream runs through the southern portion of the subject parcel. 14. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: The parcels immediately to the east, west, and south of the subject property are similarly zoned Agricultural 5-Acres (A-5a). Across Mdmalahoa Highway to the north, parcels are zoned Single-Family Residential (RS-10), Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10), and Village Commercial (CV-7.5 and CV-20). The surrounding area includes a mix agricultural, commercial, and residential uses. There are several types of commercial business operating within 500 feet of the subject property including two restaurants and a gas station. 15. ALISH: Unclassified/Prime. Approximately 50% of the subject parcel is defined as unclassified and covers the extent of the subject parcel that currently holds the SLU designation of Urban. Approximately 50% of the subject parcel is defined as Prime Agricultural Land and covers the extent of the subject parcel that currently holds the SLU designation of Agricultural. 16. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: Unclassified/"B". The Land Study Bureau (LSB) designates approximately 50% of the subject property as "unclassified" and consists of the lands designated as State Land Use Urban. The remainder of the subject parcel is classified with LSB "B" (good soils) and corresponds with lands that are designated as SLU Agricultural on the property. 17. U.S.D.A. Soil Survey: The soils on the subject property are classified as kikoni medial silt loam with 0 to 3 percent slopes. The soil consists of volcanic ash over a`d lava flows. The soil is considered well drained with a very low runoff class. 18. FEMA FIRM MAP: Zones "AE", "AO", "AEF", "X", "XS". Zone"X", which covers approximately 5% of the subject parcel, is an area determined to be outside the 500-year -4- floodplain. Zone "XS", which covers approximately 5% of the subject parcel, is an area of moderate flood hazard corresponding to areas of the 500-year floodplain, areas of one- hundred-year flooding where average depths are less than one foot, areas of one-hundred- year flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile, and areas protected from the one-hundred-year flood by levees. Zone "AO",which covers approximately 60% of the subject parcel, is the Special Flood Hazard Area that corresponds to the areas of one-hundred-year shallow flooding (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain)where average depths are between one and three feet. Average whole- foot depths derived from the detailed hydraulic analyses have been determined within this zone. Zone "AE", which covers approximately 25% of the subject parcel, is the Special Flood Hazard Area that corresponds to the 100-year floodplains that are determined in the Flood Insurance Study by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (computed flood elevation from mean sea level) derived from the detailed hydraulic analyses have been determined at selected intervals within this zone. Zone "AEF", which covers approximately 5% of the subject parcel, is the floodway areas in Zone "AE". The floodway is the channel of stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 100-year floodplains can be carried without increasing the Base Flood Elevation. All construction within Zones "AO", "AE", and"AEF" shall comply with Chapter 27,Floodplain Management, of the Hawaii County Code. 19. Flora/Fauna Resources: There were no professional surveys conducted of the floral or faunal resources of the subject property, however according to the applicants, the property is situated in a region that has been predominately comprised of truck crops, which left an unwelcoming habitat for introduced plant and animal species. According to the applicant the dominant plants on the property are Kikuya grass and eucalyptus trees. There are existing rows of eucalyptus trees along the eastern boundary of the site and along the site's boundary with the highway. The applicant reports that the site is mainly vacant of mammalian species except for introduced species including the small Indian mongoose and feral cats. According to the State Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) the Hawaiian Hawk, State listed Blackburn's Sphinx Moth, State listed Hawaiian Goose (Nene) and State listed Hawaiian -5- Hoary Bat may occur in the project vicinity. DOFAW also provided recommendations to mitigate impacts on these species. 20. Archaeological/Historic/Cultural Resources: No archaeological inventory survey was conducted for the project area. By letter, DLNR-State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD)indicated that no historic properties have been documented nearby and that the potential to impact significant historic properties is unlikely due to prior extensive land alteration associated with modern farming. SHPD also indicated that the subject property is outside the area known to contain segments of the Waimea Field System which comprises significant agricultural features. As such, SHPD stated no objections to the proposed State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone. Additionally,the Planning Department has no records of historic resources on the property, and the property is not listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places. 21. Public Access: There is no known public access to the mountain or shoreline that traverses through the subject property. 22. Traffic: A Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR)was conducted for the project in February 2018 and updated in November 2020 by Traffic Management Consultant (TMC) (see Exhibit 6 of application). The updated TIAR was designed to update and evaluate traffic count data to establish existing traffic conditions, develop trip generation characteristics, analyze traffic impact on Mamalahoa Highway from two proposed access driveways, Ishihara Farm Road and at adjacent intersections in the project area (Waikelehua Place, Keaka Kea Place and Earl's Pa`auilo Store Driveway) and to provide mitigation recommendations to impacts identified in the study. The analysis of existing traffic conditions found that all of the studied intersections operated at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS) between LOS "A" and LOS "C". The TIAR assumes full build out and occupancy of the project by 2025, at which time it is expected to generate net totals of 33 vehicle trips per hour(vph) and 47 vph, during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic,respectively. The net AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed project are not expected to exceed the fifty (50) vehicles per hour trip generation threshold established by the Concurrency Requirements of the Zoning Code. In 2025, the LOS is expected to degrade at most of the intersections, but will still be no worse than LOS "D." Based on the findings,the TIAR recommends the following traffic mitigation -6- measures: 1) The median taper on the left-turn lane on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway at Keaka Kea Place should be restriped to extend the two-way, left-turn lane from Earl's Pa`auilo Store Driveway to the beginning of the left-turn lane at Keaka Kea Place; 2) Minimum 100-foot spacings should be provided between the intersections on Mamalahoa Highway at Waikelehua Place, the west and center driveways, and Earl's Pa`auilo Store Driveway/Ishihara Farm Road; 3) A minimum of 25 feet distance should be provided between the edge of the circulatory road and the future widening of the travel way on Mamalahoa Highway; and 4) A traffic signal warrant analysis should be considered at the Mamalahoa Highway intersections at Waikelehua Place and at Keaka Kea Place by the Year 2040. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 23. Vehicular Access: Access to the property will be via Mamalahoa Highway and Ishihara Farm Road. Mamalahoa Highway is a two-lane, paved County maintained roadway and is currently striped with a two-way left turn lane in the median of the road along the frontage of the subject property. The existing dwellings on the subject site are currently accessed via Ishihara Farm Road, a private road over an approximately fifty (50)foot wide combined easement right-of-way. The subject property was allowed the ability to utilize non-exclusive access easements over and across Easements "5" and "6" and a non- exclusive utility easement over and across Easement"9", as granted by the Declaration of Easements dated May 11, 2005. The applicant is proposing three (3) driveway accesses to the project site. Two access points will be from Mamalahoa Highway and are intended to service the three (3) proposed commercial lots. The two (2) proposed driveways will connect to a circulatory roadway within the property fronting Mamalahoa Highway. The six (6)residential lots will be accessed via a driveway connection to Ishihara Farm Road, a private roadway over an approximately fifty (50)foot wide combined easement right-of-way as well as interior access easements. The commercial properties will not have vehicular access via Ishihara Farm Road. The subject property is encumbered with a 10-foot-wide "No Vehicular Access & Planting Screen" easement along its entire Mamalahoa Highway frontage, thus direct access to the highway is currently prohibited. The applicant has consulted with the -7- Planning Director and Director of Public Works to gauge support in removal of the easement, and they have indicated their support of the request. Thus, the applicant intends to formally request the removal of the restriction during the subdivision process for the property. Based on the proposed zoning, the Department of Public Works (DPW) recommends that the applicant provide improvements to the subject property's Mamalahoa Highway frontage consisting of, but not limited to, pavement widening with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, drainage improvements, signs and markings, streetlights, and any relocation of utilities,meeting the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works. DPW also recommended that the applicant install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Mamalahoa Highway is a County arterial roadway with an approximate 40-foot-wide pavement within a 50-foot right-of-way in this area. According to the General Plan, Mamalahoa Highway is designated as a secondary arterial road and thus shall be improved to the required standard with an 80-foot right-of-way, which will require the applicant to provide a 15-foot-wide future road widening setback along the property's entire Mamalahoa Highway frontage. 24. Water: According to the Department of Water Supply (DWS), water for the proposed project can be made available from an existing 12-inch waterline within Mamalahoa Highway. The applicant secured a water commitment for the proposed development in the amount of 8,000 gallons/day until July 31, 2024. DWS requires the applicant to construct necessary water system improvements, including, but not limited to the installation of service laterals that will accommodate the appropriately sized meters to front each lot, installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five (5)feet of the meter on private property, as well as relocation and adjustment of the department's affected water system facilities (should it be necessary). Finally, prior to obtaining final subdivision approval, the applicant will be required to maintain valid water commitments for the proposed subdivision as well as remit facilities charge payments and submit documents conveying the improvements and necessary easements -8- to the Water Board of the County of Hawaii. DWS also indicated that the 12-inch waterline within Mamalahoa Highway is adequate to provide the required 2,000-gallons per minute of flow for fire protection. 25. Wastewater: As there is no municipal sewer system in the area, according to the applicant, wastewater will be disposed of via individual wastewater systems, meeting the requirements of the State Department of Health. 26. Solid Waste: There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. All solid waste generated by the development will require private disposal at an approved transfer station or landfill. 27. Essential Utilities and Services: All essential utilities are available to the property. The closest police and fire stations are located in Waimea, approximately three (3) miles from the property. AGENCIES' COMMENTS 28. Department of Public Works, Engineering Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 4—September 17, 2021 Memo) 29. Department of Water Supply: (Planning Department Exhibit 5—July 13, 2021 Letter and August 30,2021 Letter) 30. Department of Environmental Management-Wastewater Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 6—September 23, 2021 Memo) 31. Fire Department: (Planning Department Exhibit 7—August 19, 2021 Letter) 32. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Engineering Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 8—September 8, 2021 Memo) 33. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Division of Forestry and Wildlife: (Planning Department Exhibit 9—September 14,2021 Memo) 34. State Department of Land and Natural Resources—State Historic Preservation Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 10—October 12,2021 Letter) AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS—NO COMMENT/CONCERNS 35. State Department of Health, Department of Environmental Management— Solid Waste Division, Police Department, State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Land Division. -9- AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS -NO RESPONSE 36. Department of Public Works—Traffic Division, Kona Traffic Safety, South Kohala Traffic, State Office of Planning, State Land Use Commission APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO AGENCY COMMENTS 37. Planning Department Exhibit 11 —November 8,2021 Letter PUBLIC COMMENTS 38. Carlene Wilson: Planning Department Exhibit 12—September 27, 2021 Email 39. `Ekela Kahuanui: Planning Department Exhibit 13 —October 5, 2021, Email -lo- ZONING § 25-5-98 (c) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the V district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. (d) Exceptions to the regulations for the V district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 9; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 4.) Division 10. CN, Neighborhood Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-100. Purpose and applicability. The CN (neighborhood commercial) district applies to strategically located centers suitable for commercial activities which shall be of such size and shape as will accommodate a compact shopping center which supplies goods and services to a residential or working population on a frequent need or convenience basis. This district is distinguished from a central commercial district which provides general business and broad services to a city or region. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-101. Designation of CN districts. Each CN (neighborhood commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol "CN' followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in thousands of square feet, required for each building site. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-102. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted in the CN district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Amusement and recreation facilities, indoor. (3) Automobile service stations. (4) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7. (5) Boarding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (6) Business services. (7) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code. (8) Churches, temples and synagogues. (9) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (10) Convenience stores. (11) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services, and mortuaries. (12) Crop production. (13) Day care centers. (14) Dwellings, double-family or duplex, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. 25-101 SUPP. 8 (7-2020) Planning Dep . Exhibit__ '1 § 25-5-102 HAWAII COUNTY CODE (15) Dwellings, multiple-family, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (16) Dwellings, single-family. (17) Family child care homes. (18) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a farmers market involves more than just the sale of local fresh and/or raw produce, plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for more than two days a week, the director, at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use, maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area. (19) Financial institutions. (20) Group living facilities. (21) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13. (22) Medical clinics. (23) Meeting facilities. (24) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (25) Museums. (26) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (27) Offices. (28) Personal services. (29) Photography studios. (30) Public uses and structures, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (31) Repair establishments, minor. (32) Restaurants. (33) Retail establishments. (34) Schools. (35) Short-term vacation rentals situated in the general plan resort and resort node areas. (36) Telecommunication antennas, as permitted under section 25-4-12. (37) Theaters. (38) Utility substations as permitted under section 25-4-11. (b) In addition to those uses permitted under subsection (a) above, the following uses may be permitted in the CN district, provided that a use permit is issued for each use: (1) Major outdoor amusement and recreation facilities. (c) Buildings and uses normally considered directly accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also be permitted in the CN district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2012, ord 12-28, sec 12; am 2018, ord 18-114, sec 10; am 2019, ord 19-100, sec 6; am 2019, ord 19-100, secs 6 and 7; am 2020, ord 20-3, sec 1.) Section 25-5-103. Height limit. The height limit in the CN district shall be forty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) SUPP. 8 (7-2020) 25-102 ZONING § 25-5-104 Section 25-5-104. Minimum building site area. The minimum building site area in the CN district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-105. Minimum building site average width. Each building site in the CN district shall have a minimum average width of sixty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-106. Minimum yards. The minimum yards in the CN district shall be as follows: (1) Front and rear yards, fifteen feet; and (2) Side yards, none, except where the adjoining building site is in an RS, RD, RM, RCX or V district. Where the side yard adjoins the side yard of a building site in an RS, RD, RM, RCX or V district, there shall be a side yard which conforms to the side yard requirements for dwelling use of the adjoining district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-107. Landscaping of yards. (a) All front yards in the CN district shall be landscaped, except for necessary access drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (b) Where any required side or rear yard in the CN district adjoins a building site in an RS, RD, RM or RCX district, the side or rear yard shall be landscaped with a screening hedge not less than forty-two inches in height, within five feet of the property line, except for necessary drives and walkways, and except for the construction of one single-family dwelling and accessory buildings per lot. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 10.) Section 25-5-108. Other regulations. (a) In conjunction with plan approval, the director may require the construction of a continuous eave overhanging the front property line in the CN district. The director may also require that the eave be of similar height and design in any one block of the CN district. (b) Plan approval shall be required for all new structures and additions to existing structures in the CN district, except for construction of one single-family dwelling and any accessory buildings per lot. 25-103 25-5-108 HAWAII COUNTY CODE (c) Exceptions to the regulations for the CN district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2005, ord 05-155, sec 11; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 4.) Division 11. CG, General Commercial Districts. Section 25-5-110. Purpose and applicability. (a) The CG (general commercial) district applies to an area suitable for commercial uses and services on a broad basis to serve as the central shopping or principal downtown area for a city or a region. (b) No CG district shall be established until there is a demonstrated need for such action and no two CG districts shall be established in such relationship to each other that they cannot act as one center and yet are too close together to serve two distinct regions. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-111. Designation of CG districts. Each CG (general commercial) district shall be designated by the symbol "CG" followed by a number which indicates the minimum land area, in thousands of square feet, required for each building site. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-112. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted uses in the CG district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Amusement and recreation facilities, indoor. (3) Art galleries, museums. (4) Art studios. (5) Automobile service stations. (6) Automobile sales and rentals. (7) Bars, nightclubs and cabarets. (8) Bed and breakfast establishments, as permitted under section 25-4-7. (9) Boarding facilities, rooming, or lodging houses, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (10) Broadcasting stations. (11) Business services. (12) Car washing, provided that if it is mechanized, sound attenuated structures or sound attenuated walls shall be erected and maintained on the property lines. (13) Catering establishments. (14) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code. 25-104 ZONING § 25-5-112 (15) Churches, temples and synagogues. (16) Cleaning plants using only nonflammable hydrocarbons in a sealed unit as the cleansing agent. (17) Commercial parking lots and garages. (18) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (19) Convenience stores. (20) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services, and mortuaries. (21) Crop production. (22) Day care centers. (23) Display rooms for products sold elsewhere. (24) Dwellings, double-family or duplex, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (25) Dwellings, multiple-family, provided that the maximum density shall be one thousand two hundred fifty square feet of land area per rentable unit or dwelling unit. (26) Dwellings, single-family. (27) Equipment sales and rental yards, and other yards where retail products are displayed in the open. (28) Family child care homes. (29) Farmers markets. When the vending activity in a farmers market involves more than just the sale of local fresh and/or raw produce, plant life, fish and local homegrown and homemade products for more than two days a week, the director, at the time of plan approval, shall restrict the hours of use, maintenance and operations and may require improvements as determined appropriate to ensure its compatibility with the existing character of the surrounding area. (30) Financial institutions. (31) Group living facilities. (32) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13. (33) Hospitals, sanitariums, old age, convalescent, nursing and rest homes and other similar uses. (34) Hotels. (35) Ice storage and dispensing facilities. (36) Laboratories, medical and research. (37) Laundries. (38) Light manufacturing, processing and packaging, where the only retail sales outlet for products produced is on the premises where produced. (39) Medical clinics. (40) Meeting facilities. (41) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (42) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (43) Offices. 25-105 ZONING § 25-4-68 Section 25-4-68. Grounds for approval or denial. The director shall approve an application for recognition of a de minimis structure position discrepancy unless: (a) The discrepancy is greater than the difference as allowed by the de minimis structure position discrepancy definition, or (b) The director finds that the improvement was placed with knowledge that it would violate the minimum yard or open space requirements; or (c) The improvement could be moved, or the discrepancy otherwise corrected, without significant expense, difficulty, or hardship to the applicant. (2002, ord 02-70, sec 3.) Section 25-4-69. Recognition of de minimis structure position discrepancy. If the director accepts the application for recognition of de minimis structure position discrepancy, the director shall notify the applicant in writing that the discrepancy is not a violation of the zoning code and that it may remain in place without a variance. (2002, ord 02-70, sec 3.) Section 25-4-70. Disclosure. A de minimis structure position discrepancy shall be disclosed by the owner to subsequent purchasers of the property in question. (2002, ord 02-70, sec 3.) Section 25-4-71. Appeals. The director's decision with respect to a de minimis structure position discrepancy is appealable to the board of appeals. (2002, ord 02-70, sec 3.) Article 5. Zoning District Regulations. Division 1. RS, Single-Family Residential Districts. Section 25-5-1. Purpose and applicability. The RS (single-family residential) district provides for lower or low and medium density residential use, for urban and suburban family life. It applies to areas having facilities, and to carry out the above stated purpose. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-2. Designation of RS districts. Each RS (single-family residential) district shall be designated on the zoning map by the symbol"RS" followed by a number which specifies the required minimum building site area in thousands of square feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) 25-73 Punning Dep . Exhibit -- 2 25-5-3 HAWAII COUNTY CODE Section 25-5-3. Permitted uses. (a) The following uses shall be permitted in the RS district: (1) Adult day care homes. (2) Cemeteries and mausoleums, as permitted under chapter 6, article 1 of this Code. (3) Community buildings, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (4) Crop production. (5) Dwellings, single-family. (6) Family child care homes. (7) Group living facilities. (8) Home occupations, as permitted under section 25-4-13. (9) Meeting facilities. (10) Model homes, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (11) Neighborhood parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, swimming pools, and similar neighborhood recreational areas and uses. (12) Public uses and structures, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (13) Short-term vacation rentals situated in the general plan resort and resort node areas. (14) Temporary real estate offices, as permitted under section 25-4-8. (15) Utility substations, as permitted under section 25-4-11. (b) In addition to those uses permitted under subsection (a) above, the following uses may be permitted in the RS district, provided that a use permit is issued for each use: (1) Bed and breakfast establishments as permitted under section 25-4-7. (2) Care homes. (3) Churches, temples and synagogues. (4) Crematoriums, funeral homes, funeral services, and mortuaries. (5) Day care centers. (6) Golf courses and related golf course uses, including golf driving ranges, golf maintenance buildings and golf club houses, provided that the property is within the state land use urban or rural district. Golf courses and golf driving ranges shall not be permitted within the state land use agricultural district unless approved by the County before July 1, 2005. (7) Hospitals, sanitariums, old age, convalescent, nursing and rest homes. (8) Schools. (9) Telecommunication antennas and towers. (10) Yacht harbors and boating facilities. (c) Buildings and uses normally considered directly accessory to the uses permitted in this section shall also be permitted in the RS district. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2012, ord 12-28, sec 3; am 2014, ord 14-86, sec 3; am 2018, ord 18-114, sec 5; am 2019, ord 19-100, sec 3.) Section 25-5-4. Height limit. The height limit in the RS district shall be thirty-five feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) SUPP. 7 (1-2020) 25-74 ZONING § 25-5-5 Section 25-5-5. Minimum building site area. The minimum building site area in the RS district shall be seven thousand five hundred square feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-6. Minimum building site average width. Each building site in the RS district shall have a minimum average width of sixty feet, plus two feet for each five hundred square feet of required building site area in excess of seven thousand five hundred square feet, except that no building site shall be required to have an average width of more than one hundred fifty feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999.) Section 25-5-7. Minimum yards. The minimum yards in the RS district shall be as follows: (1) On a building site with a required area of seven thousand five hundred square feet to and including nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine square feet: (A) Front and rear yards, fifteen feet; and (B) Side yards, eight feet. (2) On a building site with a required area of ten thousand square feet to and including nineteen thousand nine hundred ninety-nine square feet: (A) Front and rear yards, twenty feet; and (B) Side yards, ten feet. (3) On a building site with a required area of twenty thousand square feet or more: (A) Front and rear yards, twenty-five feet; and (B) Side yards, fifteen feet. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 1997, ord 97-88, sec 1.) Section 25-5-8. Other regulations. (a) There may be more than one single-family dwelling on each building site in an RS district provided there is not less than the required minimum building site area for each dwelling. (b) One guest house, in addition to a single-family dwelling, may be located on any building site in the RS district. (c) An ohana dwelling may be located on any building site in the RS district, as permitted under article 6, division 3 of this chapter. (d) If a legal building site in the RS district has less area or average width than is required, then the yard requirements for the building site shall be the same as in the RS district having the largest requirements for which the building site can comply. (e) Exceptions to the regulations for the RS district regarding heights, building site areas, building site average widths and yards, may be approved by the commission within a planned unit development, or by the director within a cluster plan development. (1996, ord 96-160, sec 2; ratified April 6, 1999; am 2015, ord 15-33, sec 3.) 25-75 CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP COH PLANNING DEPT i 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE JUN 3/�V LVL 1 P m 1•V 1 P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 W W W.CARLSMITH.COM KGARSONOCARLSMITH.COM June 30, 2021 Zendo Kern Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Room 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Maij a Jackson Re: Applicant: Kaupulehu Land, LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company Applications: (1) State Land Use Boundary Amendment Petition from the Agricultural District to the Urban District and (2) Change of Zone Application from Agricultural (A-5a)to Neighborhood Commercial(CN-10) and Single-Family Residential(RS-10) Puukapu Homesteads 1 st Series, District of South Kohala, Hawaii TMK: (3) 6-4-024:027 Dear Mr. Kern: Pursuant to Rules 10 and 13 of the County of Hawaii Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, we are enclosing for your Department's review and processing the following items: 1. Original and 20 copies of the State Land Use Boundary Amendment and Change of Zone Applications and County Environmental Report; 2. Real Property Tax clearance; 3. Listing of surrounding property owners; and 4. Filing fee in the amount of$1,200. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions concerning this submittal. Please direct all correspondence on this matter to my office. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Katherine A. Garson KAG/KYL Enclosures Planning peps. xc with enclosures: Client 4850-1411-4536.1 Exhibit HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI N 34 202 DEPT j3 APPLICA TION FOR: (1) STATE LAND USE B 0 UNDA R Y A MENDMEN T (Agricultural District to Urban District) and (2) CHANGE OF ZONE (Agricultural A-5a to Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10) and Single-Famity Residential (RS-10) Lot 11-A, Pu'ukapu Homesteads 1st Series Kamuela, District of South Kohala TMK: (3) 6-4-024:027 Prepared for: Ka'upulehti Land LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company P.O. Box 617 Kapaau, Hawaii 96755 Prepared by: Katherine A. Garson Carlsmith Ball LLP 121 Waianuenue Avenue Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Telephone: 808.935.6644 Email: kgarson�i_,carlsmith.com June 2421 WiH Y L(INNING DEF'T ■ 1 jUN 302021Pw1:03 STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT APPLICATION (15 ACRES OR LESS) COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) PETITIONER: Ka'upulehu Land LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company PETITIONER'S SIGNATURE: See attached Authorization Letter DATE: June 30, 2021 ADDRESS: P.O- Box 617, Kapaau, HI 96755-0617 PETITIONER'S INTEREST 1F NOT OWNER: Jahn F. Metzler/ Joni Metzler, Members TELEPHONE:(Bus.) (Res.) (Fax) LANDOWNER(Sy Ka'upulehu Land LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S): See attached Authorization Letter DATE: June 30, 2021 Mit be by letter) ADDRESS: P.O. Box 617, Kapaau, HI 96A59 06T7 TAX MAP KEY: (3)6-4-024:027 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 64-983 Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI 96743 ZONING: A-5a SIZE OF PROPERTY: 5.349 acres CURRENT STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: Agricultural Urban REQUESTED STATE LAND USE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: AGENT: Katherine A. Carson, Carismith Ball LLP ADDRESS: 121 Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, HI 96720 TELEPHONE: (808) 935-6644 (Res.) (Fax) Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: Carlsmith Ball LLP COPIES: Ka'upulehu Land LLC (See Instructions on Reverse Side) 142746 C0H PLftN!ING DEPT ' TUN 30 9,021 PH1:03 CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Type or legibly print the requested information) APPLICANT; Ka'upulehu Land LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE. See attached Authorization Letter DATE:June 30, 2021 ADDRESS: P.O. Box 617, Kapaau, HI 96755-0617 LIST APPLICANT'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER- John F. Metzler/Joni Metzler, Members LIST PRINCIPAL(S) INCLUDING NAMES OF MAIN OFFICERS. PHONE:(BLm) (Res.) (Fax) LANDOWNERSy Ka'upulehu Land LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(S): See attached Authorization Letter DATE. June 30, 2021 (Mar be by letter) LANDOWNERS) ADDRESS: P,0. Box 617, Ka aau, H 196755-0617 REQUEST. A-5a TO CN-10 and RS-10 I P\IS11lip IwliIII v I I Proposed 7-olillip I TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 64-983 Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI 96743 SIZE OF PROPERTY OR AFFECTED AREAS)TO BE REZONED. 5.349 acres AGENT: Katherine A. Garson, Carlsmith Ball LLP ADDRESS: 121 Waianuenue Avenue, Hilo, Hi 96724 TELEPHONE:(BLls.) (808) 935-6644 (Res.) (Fax) Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL. Carlsmith Ball LLP COPIES: Ka'upulehu Land LLC I FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Tax Map Key No.: (3) 5-4-024:427 Puukapu Homesteads,Waimea, District of South Kohala Island, County and State of Hawaii The undersigned are the Fee Owner of the real property above-identified,and hereby authorizes its attorney, CARLSMITH BALL LLP to communicate with, apply for, execute and process any and all County, State and federal governmental permit applications,and to participate in proceedings related to said real property. A photostatic or facsimile copy of this executed authorization shall also be considered as effective and valid as the original. KAUPULEHU LAND LLC, a Hawaii limited liability company By ,TORN F. LER Its Membe By JO MET ER Its Member Subscribed r fn d}before me this . f,rr •,, Name: Notary Public, State of Hawai'i Z. My commission expires: Z2 ' or Seal) � NOTARY CERTIFICATION STATEMENT Document Identification or Description: Fee Owner's Letter of Authorization Document Date: No. of Pages: Jurisdiction(in which notarial act is performed): Third �g` Signature of Notary Date of Notarization and `''`:'rye ­77Certification Statement '�= %r4 ' Printed lame of Nota �%'fl,0 ,, . i STATE OF HAWAII } }SS- COUNTY OF f bk%V 1II } On this Ia day of -. 20A2 before:me personally appeared &-)I � ,to me personally known,who,being by the duly sworn or affirmed,did say that such person executed die foregoing instrument as the free act and deed of such person,and if applicable in the capacity shnwn, having been duly authorized to execute such instrument iti such capacity. SA M+•�'ri ZC Z NO * PU Y.i ' --Notary Pubhc,State of Hawaii Ic Theresa Meikle ,rf�flf3 jr,eal) rSeal} My Commission Expires: May 28,2022 NOT&R}!CERTIFICATION SIATRWFNT f Document Identification or Description: r'S ►' ac !]E-j ) Doc. Date or,)2"Undated at time of notarization Number of Pages:_ I Third Circuit Notary Signature Date of Notarization and Certificate Statement Theres a Meikle Printed Name of NotaryRE Al J (Offrc-lam% A� 1 m {.00. V//"; F 'W11111 ATTACH ENT Cam m ercla M ,R esor-L& bdustdal PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY O F HAW ALT APPLICA`I'IM FOR CHANGE OF 20NE 1. (your request is approved,do you htend to subdivide the subjE�ctbnd b accordance with the approved change Yes ofxone? ffyes, .lease answerthe ms`.offquestbn Iand then to q'ues .`3. a. H ow m any acres of the requested aria do you 'intend subdMde. Approximately 2.300 acres b. �itowhat btsiaes? 28,194.39 sq. ft., 34,117.74 sq. ft., 3$,1377.32 sq. ft. ityourmquesLis app mved,apprr)xia ately how long E months after Council Action afterthe date ofappmvaldo you expectta subm zt your subdivsbn pbns to the Planning Departar ent forpielin tazy appmval7 If you bterrd to subdivbe,please subm ita pxelin bary schem att subdi rhbn phn'bgatherw jh yourchange of zone appliatbn barn . Attached to Background and County Environmental Report Ifvou nave no firm plans ofsubclisridhg the subjecta ma, da you intend tn: N/A a. SeltQr base the land b som Bone who has fan pians? t. SeRorloase the land to sora eone who has tentatiie plans? Sellor-ba se the bnd to som Bone who has no plans? d Keep i2 e. other please state) Ifyou :nand to do eihera,b,orc,p]ease elaborate on the tied ofp-bns the otherpaaty has.Phase,also, ncbde in youranswerapprmxin ately how soon a&?r appmvalofyourn?zon_bg do you expectb ttansbrthe subecthnd]b anotherpaty. 3. W hat speaft buiiiig plans do you have tbrf ie sub�c-_biid? liclude n your answ ertie fbJbw iig:We ofbuMhg (apartment,offr-e,laundemtte,etc.),fnancbg anangem ent do etabla forconstniction;and any othernform athn w hth you telco ighthe-P us in evaLatng your mcfuest. Mixed retail and commercial/office buildings: Proposed Lot 1 - 2-story building; approximately ± 5,600 sq. ft. gross leaseable floor area Proposed Lot 2 - 1-story 1 partial 2-story building; approximately ± 7,500 sq. ft. gross leaseable floor area Proposed Lot 3 - I-story building; approximately ±4,500 sq. ft. gross leaseable floor area H ave you pe rb m ed any study w hbh w ou}i dem onstiate a need fnr No you rpmposed bu�Jhg andhrdevebprn en t2 .ifso,pbase elaborate on yourfradEgs ii the space pmvjJed hebw. -2- 5. Have you peffizm ed any study w hkh discusses the envaanmentaIhpacts you r reque sLw oub nave on die Yes sumundng a Yea a nd/o r the C aunty? If so,p-base elaborate on your findings in the space p wiled,below. TIAR Update prepared by The Traffic Management Consultant (1110512020). ❑LNR 5HP❑ "No historic properties affected" determination letter (0813112017). 6. Are them any bu-tings on the sub�ctama? Na Ifso, whaLkbd? W hatdo you in lend to do w ih ttrcise bu:Pddgs ifyour NIA mquestb appiDved? Ts the subectland cuimntV beiig used forany Yes agrhuKural_actViLy? ifso,pbase listthe keds ofproducts grown on and how m any squaw feetoracros of hnd perpmduct? Approximately 4.5 acres in cattle grazing. B. To you rtmow bdge,has them been any fboding and/or No dranage pmbletn on the sub�ctama? If so,phase descrbe the pmb]em . 9 Do you thnk thatthe mads 3eading t) the sub:�c-.area needs b pmvem ent? Yes Jfso,w hat knd? See TIAR Update regarding The Traffic Management Consultants recommended traffic/road mitigation measures. Is the road adequate fDrthe proposed tmTr vohm e Yes orbad? See TIAR Update. 10. W hatsorLefgoveirur,enlal.assistance and,brinpmvem eats do you i-elw: be needed an the subj�-ctama when devebped? - RO S chop-b x R cads x Sewer x �. D mhage x x e. Po1be Pmtecti)n x f. Fire P mtecthn x g, RecmathnalFaciN�S x h. R ecma t bna l Fa ciWas 0 ther Public Utilities x Fortose checF:ed 'fires,"phase ehborate w hattype or kinds of in pmvem ents andr6rassistance am needed. Services necessary for public health and safety needs of mixed retail/ commercial tenants and patrons. 11.H ave you pelt m ed any histrarb sus study and,brsuzvey ofthe subj�ctazea? 1fso,whatwem the mesuh? P-base,also, subm to copy of the study togetherw±i Ihs change ofzone supphm ent Yes, DLNR SHPD issued a "no historic properties affected" determination letter dated 08131/2017. Stnatixe, See attached Authorization Letter Addmss: P.O. Box 617, Kapaau, HI 96755-0617 Te-bphone: Date: June 30, 2021 633BA 60A P.D.51$4 ATTACHMENT ResbenW1R.ezonlig PLANNING DEPARTMENT COUNTY 0 F HAW ATr APPIZATI)N FOR CHANGE of ZONE I, Ttyou r mWestis apptoved,do you intend to subdivzie the sub]?ctbnd h acomtdance w th the approved change Yes ofzone? if yes,phase answer the restofquesthn 1 and then tr} quesfn 3. 3, H ow m any ar-,ns❑fthe cequested area do you intend to Approximately 3.049 acres subdarxie? b. Into whatbtsi?es? Between 12,634.31 sq. ft. to 29,882.37 sq. ft. C- if you rmquest is approved,appmxm ately how bng 6 months after Council action. afterthe date ❑fapprnvaldo you expertb subm i yoursubdj&bn pans to the P finning D epaitrn ent forpna-lb nary apprc,va.L� Da you intend t)bu>b houses on the newlj cma ted No bts7 styes,pbase answer the foIbw ing questiDns: on haw many of those bts? A tw hatapproxin ate pite range? H Ouse Lots Total App mxin ate ,how brig,a fie r app mva 10 f the subdidsbn,wouh the fasthouse be ava>abb broccupancy? Tfyou Mend b subdariie,phase subm ita pr--Iianary schem atic subditbn phn together with you rchange ofzone app-�atbn Farm . Attached to Background and County Environmental Report. Ifyou have no flim phns ofsubdidi—hg the subtctama, do you mend to: NIA a. Se2orhase the hnd m som eone who has corn plans? b. Sellorlea se the land ib som eone who has tentage phns? SelLorbase the hnd to sam eone who has no phns? d Keep it2 e. otter phase state) f. If you blend to do e-bera,b,orc,please ehbomte on the knd ofpkns the otherpaxty has.P Lease,also, include in youranswerappmAn atelyhow soon after appmvalofyourmzoning do you expect:ta transfnrthe subj�ct_hnd to anotherpariy. Do too think thatyourmquestand you r futhe rphn s forthe hnd w:BIaJhvhte the bcalhousing stuatian? Yes ri ori Creation of 4 additional lots for the development of single-family residential dwellings, including ohana dwellings, Ale them any buiiangs on the sub�ctaiea? Yes gso, whatknd? 2 existing farm dwellings. w hatdo you intend to do w Ih those bu%zngs ifyour mquestis approved? Sell each lot/building, -2- 5. Is the sUb�c hnd cunent y being used fDrany ag riuIurnlact L*? Yes Ifso,please,bstthe kinds ofptnducts grown and on how many squaw feetoracros ofhnd perpmduct. Approximately 4.5 acres in cattle grazing. 6. To you rknow]edge,has thea been any fbodang and/or diahage pmbhm on the subkctama? No Ifso,please descrbe the pmbhm . Ino you think thattie mads hadng tra the sub:�-ctama. needs tpmvem ent No Ifso,w hatk-hd? Is the mad adequate forthe proposed tiafe+c vobm e orlaad'2 See attached TIAR Update. Yes S. W hatsortofgovemm entalassistance and/or in pavements do you feelw ffbe needed in the subj�ctarea when devebped? a. S choob X b. R oads X Sewer X J, Drainage X C. pobae P mtect bn X -3- Yes rise P ntecthn a, RecmathnalFaciTtbs x 7. Puha Utlt�5 X s other Forthose checked'yes."phase elaborate whatt-ype orkinds of in pmvem ents and/bzass3stance ase needed, Services necessary for public health, safety, educational & social well- being needs of families. S }nature: See attached Authorization tetter Addmss: P-n• Box 617, Kapaau, HI 96755-0617 Te..bphone: Date: June 30, 2021 6337A150A -4- PD.5/84 SUMMARY Applicant I Owner: Ka'upulehu Land LLC,a Hawaii limited liability company Property Location: The Project Area is located within Waimea Town on the maukalcasterly side of she Mamalahoa Highway, approximately 1 2 mile Hilo side of the Mamalahoa Iiighway/Kamamalu Street intersection and Waimea Civic Center Park. Tax Map Key: (3) 64-024,027("Property") Request: To create a 9-lot subdivision consisting of 3 retail/coni nerc:ial lots and 6 residential lots("proposed Project"). Application: (1) State Land Use Boundary Amendment Petition: Mauka portion of the Property from Agricultural District to the Urban District; and (2) Change ofZone Application (a) Makni portion of the Property from Agricultural (A-5a) to Neighborhood Cnnunarcial (CN-10)to allow for the creation of threc(3) commercial lots with three(3) 1-and 2-story mixed retail and commercialloffece buildings havinga,gross leasable boor area of approximately 18,500 sq. ft.,and (h) Mauka portion of the Property from Agricultural (A-sa)to Single-Family Residential (RS-10)to allow for the creation of six (6)residential lots (with each lot having the potential for up to 2 dwelling units). Slate Land Use.......................... UrbanlAgricultt�ral General Plan("LUPAG")Map ...........................Medium Density Urban(mdu)1 Low Density[Urban (lcht) South Kohala Community Development Plan ...............................--........Waimea Town Conceptual Plan Zoning.........................................................,--.................................... Agricultural,minimum 5-acre(A-5a) Special Management Area ................................................................................Entirely outside of the SMA Land Study Bureau.................................................................................................Unclassified 1"B" (good) ALISH......................................................................................................................Unclassified I Prime Archaeological Resources..—.—................................08131117 SHPD"no historic properties affected letter" Flora/Fauna....................... .........No threatened or endangered plant or animal species; no critical habitat Scenic and Open Space Resources............................ Not listed in the General Plan or South Kohala CDP Access.......................................................................Mamalahoa Highway and Ishihara Road Water System..........................................................Existing waterline located along Mamalahoa Highway FIRM .................................................... ----.........----..--- .---..............---...Zones X,XS, AO,AF and AEF Drainage............................Unimproved grassed swale drainage waterway along the eastern boundary Utilities.......................................................................................... .--....- -........-.....Services are available Wastewater ......................................................................... Pursuant to Department of Health requirements Police and Fire Set-vices..............................................—..............................................Set-vices are available EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit Document Exhibit l Site Plan Exhibits 2a and 2b Master Plan showing proposed State Land Use Boundary Amendment from SLU Agricultural District to Urban District and metes/bounds description Exhibit 3a,3b and 3c Master Plan showing proposed Rezoning from A-5a to CN-10 and RS-I0 and metes/bounds descriptions Exhibit 4 TMK Map Exhibit 5 Elevation Drawing Exhibit 6 TIAR Exhibit 7 01/05/21 letter of support from the South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee Exhibit S SLU Map Exhibit 9 General Plan LUPAG Map Exhibits 10a and 10b 04/26/17 letter to DLNR-SHPD requesting "no effect letter" and DLNR-SHPD 0$131117 "no historic properties affected letter" Exhibit 1 I Zoning Map Exhibit 12 South Kohala CDP Map Exhibit 13 FIRM Map Exhibits 14a and l 4b 06/17/21 letter to Department of Water Supply with Water demand Calculations and 05/25/21 Department of Water Supply Water Commitment letter BACKGROUND AND COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT I. INTRODUCTION The Applicant, Ka'upuiehu Land LLC ("Applicant") is the fee owner of Tax Map Key No.: (3)64-024:027, being Lot 1 I-A-1, an approximately 5.349-acre parcel situate in Pu'ukapu Homesteads 1st Series, Kamuela, District of South Kohala, Island of Hawaii (the "Property"). The Property is located within Waimea Town on the maukalsoutherly side of Mamalahoa Highway. The Applicant's proposed Project, Pu'ukapu Place, contemplates three(3)commercial lots each with a modest commercial building fronting Mamalahoa Highway, and six (6) residential lots, of which two of the lot are developed with existing Farm Dwellings (the "Project"). A Letter of Authorization from the Applicant is attached to the Application which allows Carlsmith Ball LLP to represent Applicant on these land use permit applications. Implementation of Applicant's proposed Project requires a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment("SLU DBA") (involving less than 15 acres) and Rezoning which are being submitted concurrently and are described below. A. STATE LAND USE DISTRICT BOUNDARY AMENDMENT- AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO URBAN DISTRICT Approximately 2.696 acres of the Property is in the State Land Use ("SLU") Urban District,while approximately 2.653 acres of the Property is in the SLU Agricultural District. Through this application, Applicant requests that the approximately 2.653-acre SLU Agricultural District portion of the Property be reclassified to the SLU Urban District. Exhibit 2a- Master Pian SLU Map. B. REZONE FROM A-5A TO CN-10 AND RS-10 The Property is presently zoned A-5a pursuant to Rezoning Ordinance No. 02-107 ("Ord. 02-107") [which repealed Rezoning Ordinance No. 93-65 ("Ord. 93-65") reclassified a portion of the Property to the CN-7.5 District] rezoned the Property to A-5a. In addition to the SLU reclassification request, Applicant is concurrently requesting a Change of Zone for the Property to the Neighborhood Commercial District, with min1mum lot sizes of 10,404 square feet("CN-la"} for approximately 2.325-acre portion of the Property which fronts Mamaiahoa Highway and an approximately 3.024-acre eastern portion of the Property to Single-Family Residential,with minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet("RS- 10")(collectively referred to herein as "COZ"). Exhibit 3a- Master Plan rezoning map. Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page I � C. SUMMARY OF PRESENT LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS SLU Urban District 1 A picultural District General Plan("LUPAG") Map medium density urban(milu)1 low density urban(Idu) Zoning A-5a SMA Entirely outside the SMA ALISH Unclassified 1 Prime LSB Unclassified 1 B FIRM AE1AO1AEF IX/XS Archeological Resources SHPD "no Historic properties affected letter dated 03/31/17 II. SUBJECT REQUEST A. DETAILS OF PROPOSED USE I DEVELOPMENT 1. Proiect Description Applicant is seeking a SLUBA and COZ of its Property in order to implement its proposed Projcct. The proposed Project, Pu'ukapu Place, will be located on the cast side of Mamalahoa Highway, between Waikelehua Place and Ishihara Farin Road. The 5.349-acre site is identified as Tax Map Key No.: (3) 6-4-024:027. Exhibit 4-TMK map. The development plan for the Property, as shown on the Site Plan (Exhibit 1) seeks to reestablish the prior commercial zoning;on a 2.325- acre segment within the SLU Urban District portion of the Property, abutting Mamalahoa Highway in order to allow for the subdivision of three(3) commercial lots, each being; between i/2- to l-acre in size to accommodate three 1- and 2-story mixed retail and commercial I office buildings. These buildings would be designed in compliance with the Waimea Design Plan. Parking and service areas would be situated to the rear of these commercial lots, out of view to passersby. There are two planned accesses off Mamalahoa Highway to these commercial lots. The mauka 1 southern portion of the Property would be for single-family residential use. The proposed Project contemplates six (6)residential lots ranging in size from 12,634 sq. ft. to 29,882 sq. ft. There are presently two (2) existing farm dwellings on this portion of the Property, and these existing homes will remain and occupy two (2)of the six (6) lots and will continue to add to the local flavor and historical significance of the Propeirty. These residences, which have been completely restored to their original condition were built by the Ishihara Family, who farmed the Property for several decades. Access to the residential lots will be off the privately owned Ishihara Farm Road and interior roadway easements, 2. Statement of Objectives and Reasons for the Request The approximately 2.696-acre portion of the Property fronting Mamalahoa Highway within the SLU Urban District is planned to be subdivided into three(3) commercial lots, which requires a Change of Zone from A-5a to CN-10. The rctnaining;portion of the Property which is located to the rear(east) of the Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 3 commercial parking lot is intended to be subdivided into six (6)residential lots, and thus requires a Change of Zone from A-5a to RS-10. This proposed RS-10 area is largely in the SLU Agricultural District and thus a SLU DBA is required to change the SLU Agricultural District area to the SLU Urban District, which would conform to the SLU Urban District designation of the makai half of the Property. Previously, an area within the SLU Urban District portion of the Property was zoned Commercial (CN-7.5)under Rezoning Ordinance No. 93-65 ("Ord. 93-65"), the zoning for which was rescinded and reverted to Agricultural (A-5a)pursuant to Ord. 02-107 due to the prior owners' inability to timely meet the conditions of approval under Ord. 93-65. The Applicant is seeking a Change of Zone in order to reestablish the commercial (CN-10)zoning over this portion of the Property. 3. Number of Acres 1 Square Feet 1 Description of existing uses, strictures and topography [preliminary site plan I legal description) The preliminary Master Pian for the proposed Project is attached as Exhibit 1. The metes and bounds descriptions and maps of the areas to be rezoned from A-5a to CN-10 and RS-10 are attached as Exhibits 3b and 3c, respectively. The area sought to be reclassified from the SLU Agricultural District to the SLU Urban District is included within the proposed RS-10 zoning district, and the metes and bounds description and map is attached as Exhibit 2b. The approximately 2.325-acre portion of the Property fronting Mamalahoa Highway and proposed to be rezoned to the CN-10 zoning district is vacant land. The area to the rear of the proposed commercial lots contains two(2)farm dwellings, originally built by the Ishihara Family (around 1920)who farmed the Property for many years, and have been restored to their original condition. 4. Proposed Units l Lots 1 Floor Area of Proposed Building Envelope The proposed Project anticipates creating a total of nine(9) lots - three (3) commercial lots and six (6)residential lots. The commercial lots are anticipated to have three (3) 1- and 2-story mixed retail and commercial 1 office buitdings, having a gross leasable floor area of approximately 18,600 square feet. The parking and service areas for the commercial buildings would be in the rear of these lots, out of view to passersby and nearby residents. The residential portion of the Property is anticipated to contain six (6)residential lots, each containing up to two(2) residential dwelling units (the second dwelling would need to be approved as an ohana unit). 5, Timeframe and Cost The subdivision application would be filed approximately six (6) months after all approvals have been secured, and expected to take approximately 7 to 9 months to receive final subdivision approval. The Applicant would like to begin Ka'upidehu Land LLC Page 4 construction within six (6)months after issuance of all pennitting approvals. The estimated cost of improvements would be about$500,000. This would primarily be for the site work,paving, utilities, etc. and driveway related improvements necessary to serve the lots. Full build out of the proposed Project is anticipated to be 2025. 6. Membership Size 1 Number of Employees and Clientele The commercial zoned portion of the Property would be subject to covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&R") intended to control the design and potential uses within the individual Iots and to ensure that the design of the commercial buildings is consistent with the guidelines of the Waimea Design Plan and in a scale and character in keeping with historic character of Waimea and the other historic commercial buildings in the surrounding area. As envisioned, the proposed Change of Zone would provide for approximately 18,600 sq. ft. of retail and office space uses in appropriately designed 1-and 2-story buildings with the parking maintained in the rear of the buildings in a manner that is more consistent the architectural character of Waimea Town, as shown in the elevation drawings depicting the general character of the buildings as viewed from Mamalahoa Highway (Exhibit,-S - commercial building elevation drawings)_ T Traffic Impacts (Assessment of Existing Traffic Conditions, Anticipated Increase in Traffic and Traffic Impacts from Proposed Use) The access to the three(3) commercial lots is proposed to be provided by two(2) driveways off of Mamalahoa Highway. The two driveways will connect to a circulatory roadway on the Property fronting Mamalahoa Highway, and will continue along the east and west sides of the commercial lots to a shared parking lot, which will be located to the rear of the commercial subdivision to maintain the character created by the adjoining properties. As for the residential lots, Ishihara Farm Road (50-ft. wide),which is located along the east(Hilo)boundary of the Property,will continue to provide access to the residential lots. Ishihara Farm Road will not provide vehicular access to the commercial portion of the proposed Project. See Exhibit I - Site Plan. As a result of SUB-7820, the Property currently has a "no vehicular access" and planting screen easement along Mamalahoa Highway. The Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the proposed Project, as well as the South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee, do not support such a restriction, and the Applicant intends to request removal of this restriction in the processing of the subdivision of the Property. A Traffic Impacl Analysis Report Updale for the proposed Project was prepared by The Traffic Management Consultant("TMC") (dated 11105120) ("TIAR") (Exhibit 6). TMC prepared a TIAR for the proposed Project in February,2018. The 2020 TIAR updates this prior study in accordance with Hawaii County Code Ka'upidehu Land LLC Page 5 ("HCC"), Chapter 25, Section 25-2-46 (Concurrency Requirements). The TIAR assumes full build out and occupancy by 2025. The proposed Project is expected to generate net totals of 33 vehicle trips per hour ("vpb") and 47 vph, during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic, respectively. The net AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Project are not expected to exceed the fifty(50) vehicles per hour trip generation threshold established by the Concurrency Requirements. See Exhibit b, p. 14. TMC recommended the following,traffic mitigation measures: ■ The median taper on the left-turn lane on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway at Keaka Kea Place should be restriped to extend the two-way, left-turn land from Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway to the beginning of the left-turn lane at Keaka Kea Place. ■ Minimum I00-foot spacing should he provided between the intersections on Mamalahoa Highway at Waikelehua Place, the West and Center Driveways, and Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway 1 Ishihara Farm Road. ■ A minimum of 25 feet distance should be provided between the edge of the circulatory road and the future widening of the travelway on Mamalahoa Highway. • Traffic signal warrant analysis should be considered at the Mamalahoa Highway intersections at Waikelehua Place and Keaka Kea Place by the Year 2040. TMC concluded that the purpose of the existing two-way, left-tuna lane in the median of Mamalahoa Highway is to accommodate the left-turn movements to and from private driveways, such as the west and center driveways of the proposed Project. The recommended spacing between the proposed access driveways and the existing roadways along Mamalahoa Highway are expected to provide two- vehicle storage lengths in the two-way, left-turn lane for vehicles turning from Mamalahoa Highway-into the proposed Project access driveways, and two-vehicle storage lengths for vehicles turning from the proposed Project access driveways. The recommended 25-foot distance between the proposed Project's circulatory road and the future widening of Mamalahoa Highway is expected to provide storage for one vehicle waiting to enter the proposed Project site. The Applicant presented its proposed Project with the South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee("SKTSC"). AppIicant's original plans proposed three (3) access points along klamalahoa Highway. Because of concerns expressed by the SKTSC, the Applicant reduced the access points ofl'Mamalahoa Highway to two Ka`uputehu Land LLC Page 6 (2). The SKTSC by letter dated 01105!21, expressed support for the proposed Project with the two access points(Exhibit 7). 8. Other Related Information The proposed Project does not trigger environmental review under Hawaii Revised Statues ("HRS") Chapter 343. While re-striping within Mamalahoa Highway and utility service connections within the County highway may be required, these de minimus uses do not rise to the level of the "use" of State or County lands sufficient to trigger HRS Chapter 343 requirements. Se-e, Umberger r, Dept of Land etc Nat. Res., 140 Hawaii 500, 403 P.3d 277 (2017) (When the proposed activity utilizes state or county lands in a decidedly inconsequential or negligible manner, like the mere connection to state or county lands in Nuuanu Vallev, or when the use is hypothetical, like the "potential use" of a public highway in Citizens, then the activity does not rise to the level of"use" contemplated by [Chapter 343].). 9. Proposed On-Site and Off--Site Infrastructure a. Access and Interior Roadway As discussed above, the proposed Property's frontage is along Mamalahoa Highway. Two access points along Mamalahoa Highway are proposed for the three(3) commercial lots, while Ishihara Farm Road will provide access for the residential portions of the Property. b. Water Water to the Property is available from an existing waterline along Mamalahoa Highway. The Applicant's engineer prepared the water demand calculations for the proposed Project(Exhibit 14a) and the DWS by letter dated 6125121, issued a water commitment letter(Exhibit 14h), The residential lot owners will be responsible for the installation of their own 518th-inch water meter to service the residential dwellings. The existing farm dwellings are currently serviced by a one-inch meter, C. Wastewater The Property is not serviced by a municipal wastewater disposal system. An IWS is allowed. (1) where the minimum land area is 10,000 square feet, (2) the total development area does not exceed 50 single family residential lots or exceed 50 dwelling units except for developments consisting of one dwelling unit per acre or greater, (3)the area of the lot shall not be less than 14,000 square feet, except for lots created and recorded before 0$130191, and (4) the total wastewater flow into one IWS shall not exceed 1,000 gallons, nor serve more than 5 bedrooms, whether they are in one dwelling unit or two (§ 11-62-31.1, Hawaii Administrative Rules). Ka'upulchu Land LLC Page 7 Wastewater disposal for each of the subdivision lots (including the commercial zoned lots) will comply with all applicable State and County regulations. III. CONFORMANCE WITH STATE/COUNTY PLANS A. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR SUBMITTAL OF CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR 15 ACRES OR LESS Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) Article 2, Division 1, Section 25-2-9 (b) (Applications including lesser actions, concurrent applications) state: "Two or more applications involving the same building site or the same project requiring commission action may be considered concurrently, provided that the commission decision on each application shall he issued separately by the commission." Hawaii County Planning Commission Rule No. 13-9 (State Land Use Boundary Amendment) Section 13-1 (Purpose and Authority) states: "This rule governs State Land Use district boundary amendment procedures pursuant to authority conferred by Section 205-3.1 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes and Chapter 28 of the Hawaii County Code, which allow the County to amend State Land Use District boundaries for lands fifteen acres or less located in the State Land Use Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Districts." Section 13-8 (Consolidated Proceeding with Other Land Use Changes) states: "A Petition for a district boundary amendment may be submitted simultaneously with other land use changes and applicable permits for consolidated review and processing, including any hearings." B. STATE LAND USE DESIGNATION Approximately 2.696 acres of the Property fronting Mamalahoa Highway is within the State Land Use Urban District, while 2.653 acres on the east side of the Property are within the State Land Use Agricultural District. See Exhibit 8 - SLU Map. To implement ]he proposed Project, Applicant is requesting that the Agricultural District portion of the Property be reclassified to the Urban District to be consistent with the remainder of the Property and to allow for the residential use of that portion of the Property. The SLU Urban District portion of the Property was originally designated by the Land Use Commission and was not subject to a State Land Use District Boundary Amendment. In establishing boundaries of the urban districts, the State Land Use Commission was to include lands that were in urban use and also was to have a sufficient reserve area for foreseeable urban growth. See HRS § 205-2(a)(1). The SLU Urban Districts include activities or uses as provided by ordinances or regulations of the county within which the urban district is situated. See HRS 205-2, The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide("LUPAG") for Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 9 the Property is Medium Density Urban (nide) and Low Density Urban (ldif) (Exhibit 9 - LUPAG Map). The 2005 General Plan provides that Medium Density Urban areas are for village and neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple fain ily residential and related functions (multiple family residential -- up to 35 units per acre). Low Density Urban is for Residential, with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and convenience-type commercial uses; overall residential density may be up to six units per acre. The area sought to be reclassified from the Agriculture District to the Urban District is primarily in the Idu portion of the Property, and thus a reel ass ification to the SLU Urban District is consistent with State and County pians. 1. The Extent To Which The Proposed Reclassification Conforms To The ApplicableDist_rict Standards The Land Use Commission's standards for determining Urban District boundaries are contained within Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 15, Subtitle 3, Chapter 15, Subchapter 8, Section 15-15-18. The standards are addressed as follows: a. It shall include lands characterized b "city-like" concentrations of eo lc structures streets urban level of services and other related land uses; Discussion: The proposed Project will be a complementary extension of the Urban District of the Property fronting Mamalahoa Highway, which is part of the Waimea Town area. Located within a 1,004 feet area radius?? of the Property are various restaurants, and other commercial enterprises such as an The Fish & The Hog restaurant, Minit Stop gas station/ convenience store, Atlas Recycling Center and Napa Auto farts. The portion of the Property which is seeking to be designated to the SLU Urban District will be rezoned to RS-10, similar to development across Mamalalioa Highway from the Property, and this will be in keeping with the combination of residential and commercial developments of the area. b_ It shall take into consideration the followingspecific factors: (i) Proximity to centers of trading and emplovment except whether the development would generate new centers Q/- lrading and emplgvnient; Ka'upulchu Land LLC Page 9 (ii) Availability of basic services such as schools,parks, wastewater systetns. solfd waste disposal, drainage, water, transportation s_wenis, public utilities, and police and.ire protectinn and (iii) Sufficient resetn-e areaso-.1breseeable urban growth; Discussion: As noted above, the area already contains developed commercial areas as part of Waimea Town, and as such, basic services are already available. The Property is in an area designated Low Density Urban in the County's General Plan LU PAG Map and is therefore part of the reserve for urban growth. C. It shall include lands with satisfactory tonography, drainage and reasonably free from the danger of any flood tsunami unstable soil condition, and other adverse environmental effects; Discussion: Having an overall slope of 0 to 10%, the topography of the proposed Project area is suited for urban development. The proposed Project area contains several flood zones(AE, AU, AEF, X and XS). The lower Lanimaumau Stream, an intennittent flowing stream is noted on the southernmost edge of the Property. The proposed Project shall comply with the requirements of HCC, Chapter 27 (Flood Control). The U.S. Geological Survey indicates that the proposed Project is located within the volcanic and seismic hazard Zone 8, which indicated only a few percent of the area covered in the past 10,000 years. d. Land contiguous with existing urban area shall be given more consideration than non-continuous land, particularly when indicated for future urban use on state or county general plans or county corrununity plans or develo men# lans- Discussion: The area sought to be redesignated is directly adjacent to the Urban District portion of the same Property and therefore merit favorable consideration over contiguous lands. C. It shall include lands in appropriate locations for new urban concentrations and shall give consideration to areas of urban growth as shown on the state and county general plans or count communityplans or development plans; Discussion: The proposed Project is consistent with the Hawaii State Plan which encourages actions that will promote the orderly development of residential areas sensitive to community needs. As noted above, the area is designated ldu on the LUPAG Map, and across Mamalahoa Highway from the proposed Project is similarly RS-10 zoned properties. Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 10 f. It inaY include lands which do not conform to the standards above-, (i) When surrounded by or adjacent to existing urban development; and 60 Only when those lands represent a minor portion of this district; Dicrussion: The proposed Project complies with the standards above as if is adjacent to existing urban developinenl. b. It shall not include lands the urbanization of which will contribute toward scattered spot urban development, necessitating unreasonable investment in public_ infrastructure or support services; and Discussion: As stated above, the Property is contiguous with the existing Urban District area. Infrastructure to support the proposed Project including water, and other utilities are already available to service the proposed Project. h. It may include lands with a_general slope of twenty percent or more if the commission finds that those lands are desirable and suitable for urban purposes and that the design fuid construction controls, as adopted by any federal, state, or county agency, are adequate to protect the public health,welfare and safety, and the public's interests in the aesthetic quality of the landscape. Discussion: The slope of the Property is 0 to 10% and therefore suitable 1br urban development. How the granting of this request would promote the effectiveness and objectives of Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended. HRS § 205-16 provides that no amendment to any land use district boundary shall be adopted unless such amendment confonns to the Hawaii State Pian. The Hawaii State Plan, as set forth in HRS Chapter 226, consist of a series of long-range and comprehensive plans, goals and policies which serve as a guide for the growth and future long-range development of the State. The goals of the Hawaii State Plan and their relationship to the proposed Project are as follows: 2. A strong,viable economy, characterized by stability, diversity, and growth, that enables the fulfillment of the needs and expectations of Hawaii's present and future generations. 3. A desired physical environment characterized by beaut cleanliness quiet, stable natural systems:and uniqueness, that enhances the mental and physical well-being of the people. Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page i t 4. Physical, social, and economic well-being,for individuals and families in Hawaii-that nourishes a_sense_of cornniunity responsibility, of caring, and of participation in community life. ^ Discussion: The portion of the proposed Project for which a SLU DBA is being sought would contribute to the attainment of the goals in the Hawaii State Plan in that increased availability of residential products to Hawaii residents would contribute to the stability, diversity and growth of the local and regional economies. More specifically, the residential portion of the proposed Project would provide housing opportunities in a planned setting in close proximity to existing development and would encourage a sense of con ununity responsibility and participation in community life. C. HOW THF PROPOSED USE IS NOT CONTRARY TO CHAPTER 205A COASTAL `LONE MANAGEMENT EXISTING PUBLIC ACCESS SCENIC OR OPEN SPACE RESOURCES. COASTAL VIEW PLANS AND COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS) The Property is not adjacent to the ocean however, as the entire island fails within the State Coastal Zone Management ("CZY!")Area, a discussion of the requests relationship to the objectives, policies, and guidelines of the CZM, as outlined in Chapter 205-A-2, HRS is warranted. 1, Recreational Resources - Provide coastal recreational opportunities accessible to the public. Discussion: As noted, the Property is not near the coast and is approximately 11 miles to the nearest shoreline. Therefore, the proposed Project will not have any adverse impact on the areas coastal recreational resources. 2. Historic Resources - Protect,preserve, and where desirable, restore thane natural and manmade historic and prehistoric resources in the coastal zone management area that are significant in Hawaiian and American history and culture. Discussion: The likelihood of the proposed Project having any impacts to the area's historic resources is extremely remote, since the Property has been previously cleared and is currently used as faun dwellings and related cattle grazing activity for several generations as part of the Ishihara farm. Additionally, the DLNR-SHPD in its review of the prior and current rezoning requests for the Property, detennined that the Property was "outside the area known to contain segments of the Waimea Field System, which comprises significant agricultural features," and that the area having been fully graded during its prior use as farm land, resulting in a determination of"no historic properties affected" for the proposed Project (Exhibit 10b). Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 12 3. Scenic and open Space Resources - Protect reserve and where desirable restore or improve the quality of coastal scenic and open sace resources. Discussion: The proposed Project will involve the construction of improvements in the rural town settling. As a result. there would be changes to the visual character of Property and therefore, an impact to the area's scenic and open space resources. However, in that the commercial development would be kept in a similar architectural character as the other historic commercial huiIdiiags ill the surrounding; area, and the additional dwellings afforded by the proposed subdivision would be similar in density and use to the existing dwellings on the Property, the proposed development would be in keeping with the rural town character of Waimea. Further, a stand of eucalyptus trees along the Highway frontage currently blocks any distant views across the Property and removal in the course of development will only enhance the opportunity for mauka views across and into the Property. Importantly, none of the scenic sites in the area is identified in the County General Plan or South Kohala CDP as sites of natural beauty. 4, Coastal Ecosystems - Protect valuable coastal ecosystems, including reefs from disruption and minimize adverse impacts on all coastal ecosystems. Discussion: Relative to coastal ecosystems, there are no impacts as the Property is located approximately 11 miles from the nearest coastline. Notwithstinding the distance, the nature of tile mixed commercial and residential Project and the construction of Department of Health ("DOW)approved wastewater system to serve these uses would result in there being virtually no potential impact to coastal ecosystems, 5. Economic Uses - Provide public or private facilities and improvements im ortant to the State's economy in suitable locations. Discussion: The proposed Project will result in new opportunities for professional office and retail-commercial uses which will aid in the overall economic use of this Property and the area in general. 6. Coastal Hazards - Reduce hazard to life and propeqy from tsunami storm waves stream flooding, erosion subsidence and pollution. Discussion: As noted,because of the distance from the shoreline, the Property is not subject to coastal hazards. The proposed Project will comply with the requirements of HCC, Chapter 27 (Flood Control). 7. Managing Development- Improve the development review process, communication and public participation in the management of coastal resources and hazards. Discussion: Relative to the managing development objective, this function is more applicable to the "authority" or approving agencies. However, it is noted Ka'upulehu Land LIX Page I3 that the proposed uses are consistent with the State and County plans for the area and would operate and be constricted within the scope of the Zoning Code. The Property would be zoned CN-10 and RS-10 and the requested use and design parameters (parking, height, setback, etc.) would be consistent with such zoning. In that regard, the proposed Project would be consistent with this policy. 8. Public Partici ation - Stimulate public awareness education. and participation in coastal management Discussion: In tcrtns of the public participation objective, this is generally a public agency function. This is achieved through the Marine and Coastal Zone Management Advisory Group and the public hearing process required pursuant to the Leeward Planning Commission's Rules and County Council's meetings on this application. Notices will be sent by the Applicant to surrounding;property owners providing notice of the submittal of the application wid again, prior to the initial public hearing. it should be noted that the Applicant has also met with pertinent community groups and surrounding property owners to alert them to the proposed SLUBA and COZ amendment request to solicit comments and concerns regarding the proposed Project. 9. Beach Protection- Protect beaches for public use and recreation. Discussion: As noted, the Property is not near the coast and thus would not have any impact on beach formations that would necessitate beach protection, 14. Marine Resources - Promote the protection, use and development of marine and coastal resources to assure their sustainabilit Discussion: Because the Property is not near the coast the proposed Project will not have any adverse impact on marine resources. Based on the foregoing, it is concluded that the proposed Project would be consistent with the objectives, policies and guidelines of the Coastal Zone Management Policies, as outlined in Chapter 205-A-2, HRS. D. APPLICABLE GOALS 1 POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF THE GENERAL PLAN The requested Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10)and Single-Family Residential (RS-I0) zoning designations supposed the following goals, policies and objectives of the economic, housing, and land use elements of the County General Plan. Ka'upulehu Land 11C page 14 I. Economic a. Goals (1) Provide residents with oppor7unities to improve their quality of life through econornic developnunt that enhances the County's natural and social environments. (2) E•conotnic development and insproveinem shall be in balance will;the:physical social, and cultural environnre ws of the island af'Nan,ail. (3) Strive for diversity and stability in the econnmie sYstem. (4) Provide an economic environment that allows new, erpanded, or improved economic opportunities that arc,romptrtihte u-ith thc• County's c ultrrral. natural and social environment. (5) Strive_for diners f cation of the economy lav strengthening existing industries ewd attracting new endeavors. (b) Strive,forfirll einplo.vnrenl. b. Policies (1) Idenfih,the needs of'the business community and take actions that are necessary to improve the husiness climate. C. Objectives/Courses of Action (1) Encourage the preservation of the rural, ranching character within the town of Wainiva, Discussion: The proposed Project will provide short-term construction- related job opportunities. Property, income, excise and other taxes will be generated, resulting in an increase in State and County revenues which in turn can be used to provide needed public services and facilities. The proposed Project will provide commercial space for the people of South Kohala and auighboring areas in a design consistent with the ranching character of the town. The proposed Project will also provide new housing opportunities for residents close to the commercial center, limit long commutes and improve their quality of life. 2. Housing a. Goals (1) Attain safe, sanitary. anet linable housing far the residents of 1he County AfHawaii. (Z) Attain a diversity of socio-economic housing prix throughout the difj''erent parts of the County. (3) Maintain a housing supply that allows a variety ref choices. (4) Encourage and expand home ownership opportunities.for residents. Kdupulehu Land LLC Page 15 b. Policies (l) Encourage a volume of construction acrdrehabilhation of housing sI{Ificient to meet growth needs and correct existing deficiencies. (2) Aid and encourage the development ol*a ride variety of housing to achieve a diversity of socio-econointIc housing tmft. Discussion: The residential portion of the proposed Project will provide lot sizes ranging from 12,634 sq. 11. to 29,882 sq. fl. for people who appreciate the ranching atmosphere of Waimea, but do not necessarily want to Tarin or ranch, thus expanding the home ownership opportunities for residents. 3. Land use a. Goals(Generallyl (1) Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proporlions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, andphysical environments ofthe County, b. Policies (Generally) (1) 'Lone urban-t)�pes of wws in areas ii ith ease of access to community services and employment centers and with adequate public utilities and facilities. (2) Promote and encourage the rehabilitation and use err'ur ban areas that are.serviced by basic cornmunitv,facililies and utilities. (3) Allocate appropriate reque.eted caning in occordance with the existing or projected needs o f'neighhorhood, community, region and County. (4) Encourage the development and maintenance of communities meeting the needs o 'its residents in balance ii,ith the physical and social environment. (5) Encourage urban development within existing zoned areas already served by basic infrasrr acture, or close to such areas, instead of scattered dei=elopment. Discussion: The Property is located in the urban area of the Waimea Town Center and is designated mdu and Idle by the General Plan. This area has existing CN-1 a, CN-7.5 and RS-1 D zoning in close proximity to the Property. The Property is already served by existing utilities,and is close to Waimea Town Center, the hub of Waimea. Kdupulchu Land LLC Page 16 C. Commercial Development (1) Goals (a) lrovi'de.lbr conrmercial cde veloptnenls that inavintiz convenience to risers, (b) Provide coniniercial developinenis that conipleni nt the overall paltern cif transportation and land usage ivithin the islands regions, ewntnuanities, and neighborhoods. (2) Policies (a) C'ormmercial facilities.shall be developed in areas adequately serried l-v necessary services,such as water, utilities, setiver:s, and transportation systems.Should strati.services not be available, the development ofinore intensive uses should he in concert with a localized pmgrarir o/public acrd private capital inipr ovenients to meet the expected increased needs. (b) Distribution ofconunercial areas shall meet the denurnels cif' neighborhood, coniniunity and regional needs. (c) Encourage the concentration gf'comniercial rises within and surrounding ra central core.area. (d) The development of cornniercial fracilities should he designed to fat into the locale with minimal intrusion while providing the desired services.Appropriate igfraslruclure and design concerns shall he incorporated into the review ofsuc•h developrtients. (3) Objectives/Courses of Action (a) The establishment of'Wafniea cis a regional cononercial center ,for northern Hauaii shall he encouraged. (b) Continue the concentration of cotnniercical uses in Waimea, Kawaihae, Waikoloa Village, and in the resort areas. Do not allow?strip or spot commercial developineiaa nn highways Outside of Neese priniary commercial areas. (G) Village, and in the resort areas.Do not allow strip or spot commercial development on higlmi qys outside aa'lhese primary coniniercial areas. Discussion:The portion of the Property that abuts Marnaiahoa Highway is within the SLU Urban area, and is planned for commercial development to support the Waimea area. The General Pian LUPAG map designates the SLU Urban portion of the Property as ntdu. The portion of the Property sought to be rezoned to CN-1D is thus part of the State and County plan for this area. Ka'upulehu Land I.i.0 Page 17 d. Single-Family Residential (1) Goals (a) To maximize choices ol'single_Minily residential lots andlor horesing for residents raf'the County (h) To provide single-family residential areas conveniently located to public and private services, stropping, other conununiop activities and convenient access to empinvnaew centers that relkes natural beauty into consideration (c) To enhance lire overall yualiry of life in our residential communities. (Z) Polices (a) Designate and allocate single-family residential zoned lands at varying densities fir f(tire use in accor Glance with the needs of' the comnurniries and the.stated goals,Policies, and standards, (b) Rival-style residential-agricultural developrnent.s, such as nevi snxrll Seale rural eornnn(nrties or aytensions of existing rimerl corninunitic.s, shall be encouraged in appropriate locarions. Discussion: The residential portion of the proposed Project will provide for lots sizes ranging from 12,634 sq. ft. to 29,882 sq. f3. for people who appreciate the ranching atmosphere of Waimea,but do not necessarily want to farm or ranch, thus expanding the home ownership opportunities for residents near a commercial center. E. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION LUPAG MAP -THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION CONFORMS TO THE APPLICABLE GOALS POLICIES STANDARDS AND COURSES OF ACTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCES, PLANS AND DOCUMENTS The County General Plan LUPAG Map designates the Property as Medium Density Urban (mdu)and Low Density Urban (ldu) land uses. See Exhibit 9. The Medium and Low Density Urban designations shown on the LUPAG map are attributed to those areas where the following land uses would be appropriate: Medium„Densily: Village and neighborhood commercial and single,fancily and multiple family residential and related fenetions (multiple family residenlial— up to 35 units per acre). Ka'upulehu Land l.l_C Page 18 Low Denasily: Residential, with ancillary cwnrinu city a►ndpuhlic uses, and neighborhood and convenience-tvpe corn►raerciral uses; overall residential density may he aal► to six units per acre. Based upon the above, the requested Neighborhood Commercial (CN-10) and Single-Family Residential (RS-10) zoning designations conforms to the General Plan land use designation for this area, and no amendment to the LUPAG map is needed. F. ZONING Existing zoning for this property is Agricultural (A-5a). The properties in the general area have a mix of agricultural, commercial and residential zonings. As shown in the County Zoning Map, Exhibit 11, adjoining Iands on the same side of Mamalahoa Highway and to the west and east have a mix of Commercial (CN-10 and CN 7.5)and Agricultural (A-5a)zoning designations. Those properties directly across Mamalahoa Highway and to the northeast and northwest of the Property include a mix of Commercial (CV 7.5 and CN-10) and Residential (RS-10) zoning designations. Other properties in the SLU "Agricultural" District to the south, southeast and southwest are similarly zoned Agricultural (A-5a). As noted, the Applicant is seeking the proposed rezoning in order to reestablish the prior Commercial (CN-10) zoning within the present SLU "Urban" portion and to reclassify the Agriculture zoning designation for the remaining approximately 3.024-acre portion from the existing Agriculture(A-5a) to Single Family Residential (RS-10) in order to provide separate lots for the two (2) existing fanm dwellings on the Property and the creation of 4 new additional residential lots in the remaining portion. If approved, the Property would be subdivided in a manner meeting with the Zoning Code and the Subdivision Code. Any zoning amendment application requires compliance with the County's concurrency standards under§ 25-2-46 HCC for roads, water supply, and civil defense sirens. Tru ac: The preparation of a TIAR is required for applications for zoning amendments that can generate fifty or more peak hour trips [§ 25-2-46(d)(1), HCC], Discussion. A TIAR was prepared by The Traffic Management Consultant ("TMC") (11105120), The proposed Project is expected to generate net totals of 33 vehicle trips per hour("vph") and 47 vph, during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic, respectively. The net AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Project are not expected to exceed the fifty(50) vehicles per hour trip generation threshold established under the concurrency standards. See Exhibit G, p. 14. Ka'upulehu Land LLC P�igc 19 The Applicant also presented their proposed Project with the SKTSC, who provided a letter of support for the proposed Project (see Exhibit 7), Water: A zoning amendment shall not be granted unless: (1) Department of Water Supply("DWS")has determined that the water requirements of the proposed Project can be met and issues a water commitment using its existing water system, or(2) specific improvements to the existing public water system or a private water system equivalent to the requirements of DWS will be provided to meet the water needs of the proposed Project:. The conditions of zoning may delay occupancy until the necessary improvements are actually constructed [5 25- 2-46(m), HCC], Discussion. Water to the Property is available from an existing waterline along Mamalahoa Highway. The Applicant has submitted its water demand calculations to DWS and received water availability confirmation (see Exhibit Ma and 14h). Civil Defense; Any combination of residential units, commercial space and industrial space equal to or greater than 3,500 square feet of gross floor area; unless existing civil defense sirens, as determined by the State Civil Defense, are available to provide adequate warning coverage across the entire project site or that the provisions of civil defense sirens to provide such coverage is integrated as part of the Toning amendment. Discussion. The civil defense siren is one type of tsunami warning system and is linked to the Hawaii State Civil Defense Outdoor Siren Warning System, activated by the County's civil defense system or by neighboring tsunami warning centers, in case of potentially life-threatening tsunami or other natural disaster. The Property is located approximately 11 miles from the coastline, is outside of the County of Hawaii's Civil Defense Agency's Tsunami Evacuation Zone and is located approximately 0.67 mile of the Waimea Fire Station. Therefore, the installation of a civil defense siren should not be warranted. G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposed Project would be consistent with the South Kohala Community Development Plan ("South Kohala CDP") and Waimea Town Conceptual Plan as shown in Exhibit 12, in that the Property is located in an area designated as part of the urban core of Waimea for the commercial planned portion and in an area designated for small farms and ranches in the residential portion. Further, in that design controls would be implemented to insure that the design of the commercial buildings is consistent with the guidelines of the Waimea Design Plan and in a scale and character in keeping with the historic character of Waimea and other historic commercial buildings in the area. The proposed Project would be in concert with Policy No. I (Preservation of Warmea's Sense gfPlace), and specifically, Strategy y 1.7 (Encourage design and carchiteclural guidelines) that Ka'uputehu Land LLC Page 20 promote Waimea's Paniolo Heritage, which calls for the Waimea Design Plan to be used as a reference and starting point for formulating additional design and architectural guidelines for new developments in Waimea. While the South Kohala CDP identifies the portion of the Property sought to be rezoned to RS-10 as `Small Farms & Ranches Preservation Program", this is contrary to that portion of the Property's Low Density Urban designation in the General Plan. H. SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA The Property is not located within the County of Hawaii's Special Management Area, therefore, no SMA Use Permit would be required. I. SURROUNDING ZONING AND LAND USES The Property is located in a mixed residential and commercial area that approaches the Waimea Town Center, The area across Mamalahoa Highway from the proposed Project is designated SLU Urbain District, as are the eastern and western sides of the present SLU Urban District portion of the Property, while the southern portion of the Property is designated SLU Ag.District. Zoning across Mamalahoa Highways is RS-l0 and CN-10. Lots on the same side of Mamalahoa Highway include CN-l0 and CN-7.5 zoning. IV. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA A. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICSIENVIRONMENTAL SET'T'ING 1, Description of Sub'ect Property, Location Climate Topography, Slope, Soils(including size, shape, existing structures) The Property is a 5.349-acre parcel located near the intersection of Mamalahoa Highway and Keaka Kea Place, fronting Mamalahoa Highway, at approximately the 2,760-foot elevation within the area of the Pu'ukapu Homesteads Subdivision of Waimea. The mean annual rainfall in this area is approximately eighty(80) inches. The wetter months tend to occur between March through September. The mean annual temperature is about seventy(70) degrees Fahrenheit to the lower SD's. Because the site is situated on the somewhat windward side of the island, winds tend to be trades and variable. Slight northwestern winds occur during the day, while westerly or mountain winds are prevalent during the evenings. Ka upulehu Land LLC Page 21 There are two (2) existing farm dwellings with associated driveways oil the property which are accessed by a common paved drive that serves the subject Property and the three(3) contiguous parcels. The remainder of the Property, which had been previously in farm use for several decades is covered with various grasses and used intennittently for cattle grazing, There are also rows of eucalyptus trees along the castem boundary and along the highway boundary. ?. Lava Hazard Zone The United States Department of the Interior/Geologic Survey designates this area on a descending scale of risk 1 to 9 as Zone 8, thus a relatively low risk of lava hard in this area. This might be compared to the City of Hilo which is designated in Zone 3 and is exposed to a considerably higher risk of lava hazard. There is little that can be done to mitigate this situation and it represents a potential threat to all residents and businesses. The entire Island of Hawaii falls within Earthquake Zone 4, according to the County Building Code. As such, the applicant understands and accepts that there may be added structural requirements to address this potential for seismic hazard for any new construction or improvements. 3. Distance from Coastline The Property is approximately 11 miles from the coastline. 4. Agricultural Lands of Importance in the State of Hawaii "ALISH" desk Soils within the subject Property are classified by the ALISH system as unclassified for a portion of the Property and "Prime" for the portion of the Property that is in the SLU Ag District area. 5. U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Services Soil Service Report Soil type The soil survey report classifies the soils within the property as predominately Kikoni Series, which consists of well-drained very fine sandy loams that formed in volcanic ash. These soils are nearly level to moderately sloping. Kikoni soils are used for pasture and truck crops. 6. Land Study Bureau soil rating Soils within the subject property are unclassified in the SLU Urban area or classified as "B" or good over the SLU Ag District area. 7. Flood Insurance Rate Ma "FIRM" designation The FIRM Maps for the County indicate that portions of the Kamuela and lower La.nimaumau Streams extend along the Property's northern boundary with Ka'upuFehu Land LLC page 27 Mainalahoa Highway and the along the southern property boundary, respectively. The more recently adopted FIRM snaps(Exhibit 13) indicate the majority of the property to be in the AO zone, with depths of I-foot and the areas associated with the two streams near the pmperty boundaries to be in the AE zone [where the base flood elevation ("BFE") is determined]. The AEF zone is where the floodway is the channel of stream plus adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept fee of encroachments so that the I% annual chance flood can be carried without increasing the BFE, The XS zone are areas of 0.2%annual chance flood. 8. Existiny,Drainage Was or Improvements An unimproved grassed swale drainage waterway is located along the eastern boundary of the Property not improved (see Exhibit 13 - DFIRM Map), 9. Air/Noise/Water Quality Generally, air quality-is affected by regional and local climates, together with the amount and type of human activity in a given location. There are no large, stationary sources of air pollutants and no major industries that would contribute to air pollution located within the vicinity of the proposed Project. The proposed Project would generate a slight increase in traffic and is not expected to generate significant levels of air pollutants. Those generated would be dispersed rapidly by the prevailing winds. There could be short-term air quality impacts due to construction activities however, these impacts could be mitigated through utilization of best management practices during construction activities. Noise levels in the proposed Project area are primarily influenced by traffic along Mamalahoa Highway. There could be short-term noise impacts dues to construction activities however, these impacts can he mitigated through scheduling work during the daytime hours. When fully developed,the proposed Project is not expected to add significantly to current noise level, B. HISTORIC RESOURCES E Existing Archaeological, Cultural or Historic Sites on National Register or Hawaii Reizisler By letter dated 04126i 17, Applicant submitted a letter to DLNR-SHPD requesting a letter of"no effect" for the proposed Project (Exhibit I[la). DLNR-SHPD by letter dated 08131117, stated that no previously identified historic properties in the vicinity of the Properry were located, and although no archeological inventory was conducted, potential to impact historic properties is unlikely due to prior extensive land alteration associated with small farming. See Exhibit 10b. Therefore, SHPD found no historic properties affected. Although the Project proposed at the time the letter was issued was for the same commercial portion of the land adjacent to the highway and three one-acre agriculture lots, SHPD's conclusion is stili applicable to this proposed Project. Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 23 C. NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Existing Floral/Faunal Resources (any native or exotic plants any listed or candidate for endangered species) Formai flora and fauna studies were not prepared. The Property is situated in a region that has been predominantly comprised of truck crops, which left an unwelcoming habitat for introduced plant and animal species. Dominant plants are Kikuyu grass (pennisetunr clandestirr an), and Eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus rohusta). The Property is not located within the Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species as identified by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Services. The mammalian fauna of the Property is mainly vacant of mammal species with the exception of introduced species, including small Indian mongooses (flerpestcs a. auropunctatus) and feral cats (Fells tallies). 2. Scenic or Coastal Resources As noted above, the Property is approximately 11 miles from the coastline in Kawaihae and thus will not impact coastal resources. The Property is not listed as distinctive and identifiable land farms distinguished as landmarks or as having a front yard vista of distinctive features as identified in the General Plan within the South Kona District and South Kohala CDP. D. VALUED CULTURAL RESOURCES Ka Pa'akai O Ka'aina Analysis) Pursuant to the requirements of HRS § 205A-4, and the Hawaii Supreme Court riling in the Ka Pa'akai Q Ka 'Rina case, the Leeward Planning Commission is required to make specific findings and conclusions relating to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights in terms of the cultural, historical, and Natural resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site as follows: 1. Identify any traditional and customary naive Hawaiian rights that are exercised in the area; the extent in which the proposed development will affect these rights; and feasible action to be taken to Protect native Hawaiian rights if they exist Discussion. No traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are known to have been exercised in the area. The Property has a long and notable history of farming, having been owned by the Ishihara family, which had farmed the Property and adjoining;lands for generations, growing primarily celery and a variety of truck crops. The Property is part of the Puukapu Homesteads in Waimea, which is shown on maps from 1893 and 1923. The Ishihara family purchased the land in the 1930's and farmed the land until about 1990. Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 24 2. The extent to which those resources - including traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights - will be affected or impaired by the proposed action; and Discussion. The valued cultural,historical or natural resources will not be affected or impaired by the proposed Project and uses, since no traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are known to have been exercised in the area. 3. The feasible action, if any, to be taken by the Leeward Planning Commission to reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. Discussion. There is no feasible action to be taken by the Leeward Planning Commission ether than to require that if in the future, any valued cultural, historical and natural resources and/or traditional and customary native Hawaiian tights are discovered within the Property, that the Applicant will report the discovery to DLNR-SHPD for review and assessment. E. PUBLIC ACCESS 1. Existing}public access to and along the shoreline or to mountain areas and knowledge of public access being used There are no known public access sites on or over the Property. F. SOCIAL-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS 1. Social Settlement Pattern for the Area The requested SLUBA and rezoning would provide opportunities for a mix of commercial and residential activities and uses that is consistent with the scale and character of historic Waimea Town. ?. Economic Resources of the Area The requested SLUBA and COZ amendment would allow for the proportioning an equal sized lots in relation to the existing residences and for the creation of additional lots and for the creation of three(3) commercial parcels that would be developed in a manner that is consistent with the Character and uses in the area. While some restrictions will be placed on the potential uses on the commercial portion to eliminate the impact of potential high impact uses, the proposed SLUBA and COZ amendment will provide a range of opportunities for retail commercial, office, and professional uses in the commercially zoned portion and a more intensive and efficient use of the land in the residential zone portion. As such, added tax revenue from increased property values, employment from the development and operation of the commercial properties, and from the investment in the development of the Property would have a positive influence on the Island and area's economy. Ka'upulchu Land LLC Page 25 3. Land Values The present real property tax market land value for this Property in its present agricultural use is $459,800. G. SURROUNDING LANDS I. Land Use The land uses in the area surrounding the Property include a mix of low density agriculture, neighborhood and village commercial uses, and small residential subdivisions. Lots adjoining the site are generally 5-acres in size, and lots that face the Property from the northern side of Mamalahoa Highway are either residential lots, of about '/-acre in size, or neighborhood commercial uses on lots that range from '/ to a/ of an acre in size. While the adjacent properties are agriculturally zoned properties, there does not appear to be any active farming on any of the properties other than portions that may occasionally be in pasture use It should be noted that additional commercial uses are found less than 200 feet away, both to the east and west, along both sides of the highway. The heart of the town of Waimea is located less than a mile to the west and there are a mix of commercial and residential uses between the subject Properly and the core of Waimea. 2. Zoning Toning for the properties directly south and north are A-5a, while across Mamalahoa Highway are RS-10 and CN-10 zoned lots. See Exhihit 11. V. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES A. DESCRIPTION OF ACCESS As noted above, the Property fronts Mamalahoa Highway. The access to the three(3) commercial lots is proposed to be provided by two (2)driveways on Mamalahoa Highway, The two driveways will connect to a circulatory roadway on the Property fronting Mamalahoa Highway, and will continue along the east and west sides of the commercial lots to shared parking lot, which will be located to the rear of the commercial subdivision to maintain the character created by the adjoining properties. As for the residential lots, Ishihara Farm Road, which is located along the east (Hilo) boundary of the Property, wil l continue to provide access to the residential lots. Ishihara harm Road will not provide vehicular access to the commercial portion of the proposed Project. Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 26 B. AVAILABILITY OF WATER Potable water to the Property is available from an existing I2-inch waterline along Mamalahoa Highway. The Applicant's engineer has prepared the water demand calculations for the proposed Project (Exhibit 14a) and the Applicant received a water commitment letter from the DWS for the proposed Project dated .lune 25, 2021 (Exhibit 14h). The residential lots owners will be responsible for the installation of their own 518th-inch water meter to service the residential dwellings. The existing fame dwellings are currently serviced by a 5/8th-inch meter. In addition, the Puukapu Farm Lots arc serviced by the State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture's Waimea Irrigation System, which system is located rnauka of the Property. This agricultural water previously supported the Ishihara Family's truck crop operations on the Property. C. SEWAGE DISPOSAL The Property is not serviced by a municipal wastewater disposal system. An IWS is allowed. (1) where the minimum Iand area is 10,000 square feet, (2) the total development area does not exceed 50 single family residential lots or exceed 50 dwelling units except for developments consisting of one dwelling unit per acre or greater, (3)the area of the lot shall not be less than 10,000 square feet, except for lots created and recorded before 08130191, and (4) the total wastewater flow into one IWS shall not exceed 1,004 gallons, nor serve more than 5 bedrooms, whether they are in one dwelling unit or two Q 11-62-3 1.1, Hawaii Administrative Rules). Wastewater disposal for each of the subdivision lots (including the commercial zoned lots) will comply with all applicable State and County regulations. D. SOLID WASTE Approximately 3.5 miles from the Property is the Waimea Recycling and Transfer Station. E. POLICE AND FIRE SERVICES The Waimea Police Station is located approximately 0.67 mile from the Property. While the Waimea Fire Station is located 0.70 mile from the Property_ F. SCHOOLS There are numerous private and public schools within the Waimea area. Public schools are Waimea Elementary and Intermediate School, while the areas public middle and high school would be Honokaa. Private schools Hawaii Preparatory Academy and Parker School offer both elementary, intermediate and high school curriculum. Kamehameha preschool is also within the Waimea area. Ka'upulthu Land LLC Page 27 G. PARKS The area is served by the County's Waimea Park, which includes a skate park and playground. H. O'T'HER UTILITIES AND SERVICES TELEPHONEIELECTRICITY The area is served by Hawaii Electric Light Company, Hawaiian Telcom and Spectrum. VI, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS A. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT TERM USES OF ENVIRONMENT AND MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG TERM PRODUCTIVITY In terms of the relationship between short-term use of man's environment and the maintenance and enhancement of Iong-term productivity, no short-term exploitation of resources that would entail negative long-tenn consequences have been identified for the proposed action_ B. MITIGATIVE MEASURES PROPOSED TO AVOID MINIMIZE RECTIFY OR REDUCE IMPACT Mitigation measures which will be employed to ensure that potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from the development of the proposed Project will include: • limiting construction activities to daytime hours ■ adherence to all Federal, State, and County laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to environmental protection, health, safety, and construction • covering open vehicles carrying soils, gravel, or other particulate matter • controlling dust by watering exposed areas and through use of proper stockpiling procedures C. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT No Action Alternative: The "no action" alternative would result in no physical change to the Property and leave it in its current state. This would prevent the County's long-term goals for the Waimea Area as outlined in the various State and County Plans to be unmet as the area sought to be rezoned to CN-10 is designated as SLU Urban and Medium Density Urban under the General Plan LUPAG Map. There is also a growing need for single-family residential lots in the Waimea area, and under the"no action" alternative, the additional lots that would be provided through the proposed Project would not be available. Additionally, under the"no action" alternative, no increase in government revenues from higher real property taxes would be realized. Ka'upulehu Land I_ -C Page 28 Alternative Use: The current zoning for the Property is A}7, lculture{A-5a}. However, this zoning is inconsistent with the SLU Urban designation of the portion of the Property abutting Mamalahoa Highway, and thus is not consistent with the State PIan. nor with the General Plan's medium density urban LUPAG designation for this area which already has commercial uses to the North and South of the Property. Thus, keeping eh Property zoned A-5A would not further the State and County goals as set forth in their various plans. Additionally,retaining the Property for Agricultural Use would defy the public the socio-economic benefits associated with the proposed Project. D. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF NATURAL RESOURCES THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED IF PROPOSED ACTION IMPLEMENTED The proposed rezoning and subdivision of the property into three commercial and six single-family residential lots would cause no irreversible and irretrievable commitment of natural resources. The subject Property is already disturbed. As such, the proposed Project should not result in ori irreversible commitment of natural, archaeological or cultural resources that might be present. 4819-8565.2694.3 Ka'upulehu Land LLC Page 29 it 1 �J I 11-M l� E li V I jam/Ill I E F 6¢���• �^• gb-66o6og � & 2111—i" u 's 7d 4ie o d+ lit, a5-3 ° a' „ yt _� y _ e+sr� �'S MAL4 No _ NIGNIY4V s= S' `�-•z \ I s S it a g�g'�• m s>n. it a yA I e� C ' � r If I I i; W N STATE LAND USE URBAN DISTRICT BOUNDARY Affecting Lot I I-A-1 as shown on Subdivision Map No. s7820 Being a portion of Grant 4598 to Estate of David Koki Situated at Puukapu,Waimea, South Kohala, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Beginning at the Southwest corner of this parcel of land, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Govemment Survey Triangulation Station "WEST BASE" being 944.18 feet South and 2,698.08 feet East, and thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: I. 149° 07' 471.30 feet along Lot B and Parcel 28; 2. 2500 21' 341.77 feet along the remainder of Lot 11-A-1; 3. 3290 07' 218.26 feet along Lot 11-A-2; 7. 300 02' 383.59 feet along same, to the point of beginning and containing an area of 2.653 Acres. LICFNSED PRG:ESSQNAL * LAND * 'I'OWILL,SHIGEOKA&ASSOCIATES SURVEYOR No.5075 ��K'Ali,u�P 2153 North King Street,Suite 308 Robert K.Y. .ec Honolulu,Hawaii 46819 Licensed Professional Land Surveyor June 23,2021 Certificate Number 5075 Joh No, 5496 EXHIBIT 2b TOWILL, SHIGEQKA & AsSUCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS. 2153 NOHTFI KING STREET • SUITE 308 • HONOLULU.HAWAII 968111 t 'Rif MA Mq, WA k" | |, ^ �-- � . ||( , | { } ` : 1. \! i ; ` i \ 1. ) i ` } �'|�! i5 § i` t|$ {}! )} ((�( � I § � � ^� ` . - ` | § \� || ` | |� | �\^ ^ -- � .©^ / � m |/ A _ 2 x T 3: a at co W .-q NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT(CN-10) PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL (A-5a)TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN-10) DISTRICT Being portion of Lot 11-A-1 as shown on Subdivision Map No. s7824 Situated at Puukapu,Waimea, South Kohala, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Beginning at the Northwest corner of this parcel of land, being also the Northeast corner of Parcel 28, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Goverrunent Survey Triangulation Station "WEST BASE" being 238.81 feet South and 2,276.24 feet East, and thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 250°21' 321.25 feet along Southeasterly side of Mamalahoa Highway; 2_ 'Thence along Lot I I-A-2, on a curve to the right with a radius of 25.00 feet, the chord azimuth and distance being: 2890 44' 31.73 feet; 3. 329° 07' 220.84 feet along same; 4. 590 07' 170.00 feet along the remainder of Lot 11-A-1; 5. 329° 07' 62.40 feet along same; 6. 59° 07' 67.84 feet along same; 7, 700 21' 99.29 feet along same; 8. 1490 07' 350.50 feet along Parcel 28,to the point of beginning and containing an area of 2.325 Acres. LICENSED PHU.ESSIDNAL * LAND * TOWILL,SHIGEOKA&ASSOCIATF,S SURVEYOR No.5075 .sr P 2153 North King Street,Suite 308 Robert K.Y. Lee Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 Licensed Professional Land Surveyor June 23,2021 Certificate Number 5075 Job No. 5496 EXHIBIT 3b Tawir.r., SHIGEOKA & ASsOcIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS 2153 NORTH KING STREET • SUITE 3518 ■ HONQLULt:,HRWAII 96819 I r SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (RS-10) PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONE FROM AGRICULTURAL(A-5a)TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(RS-10)DISTRIC`i' Being portion of Lot l 1-A-1 as shown) on Subdivision Map No. s7820 Situated at Puukapu, Waimea, South Kohala, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii Beginning at the Southwest comer of this parecl of land, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station "WEST BASE" being 944.18 feet South and 2,698.08 feet East, and thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from True South: 1. 149°07' 471.30 feet along Lot B and Parcel 28; 2. 2500 21' 99.29 feet along the remainder of Lot 11-A-1; 3. 2390 07' 67.84 feet along same; 4. 1490 07' 62.00 feet along same; 5. 2390 07' 170.00 feet along same; 6. 3290 07' 327.50 feet along Lot 11-A-2; 7, 30" 02' 383.59 feet along same, to the point of beginning and containing an area of 3.024 Acres. fi LICENSED P'RCt ESSIOMAL * LAND SURVEYOR TOWILL,SHIGEOKA&ASSOCIATES No-6075 a AIi_ G� 2153 North King Street,Suite 308 Robert K.Y. Lee Honolulu,Hawaii 96819 Licensed Professional Land Surveyor June 23,2021 Certificate Number 5075 Job No. 5496 EXHIBIT 3c TowILL, SHIGEOKA & ASsocIATES, INC. LAND SURWYORS 2153 NORTH KING STREFT - SUITE 30ft - HONOLULU,HAWAII 45819 a S � .y 4 r Psi! 1 •} '� � ;,.'�• „ � 4i•, ' �`ler� t e I� ■■ 1 io OD b it k � Il � 1' I " ISI h i n a � ti 3 I ca a r I �.s I I i I �I IN 1 �4k Ilk - .s j _JK J i + I f n L � r' S A R n TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PU` UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 PREPARED FOR KAUPULEHU LAND, LLC NOVEMBER 5, 2020 PREPARED BY 46 kM TMC THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT EXHIBIT 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PU' UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 =p -0V S Qk4 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL * ENGINEER No.4922-C P' I HIS WORN WAS PREPARPD 6Y M£CR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. 4/3012022 Si SURE EXPIRATION PATF.[1F I!CENSE TMC THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT MN ?* RAN DALL S. 0KANEKV,P.E.,PRINCIPAL• 1188 BISHOP STREET,SUITE 1907■ HONOLULU,HI 96913 Table of Contents Paye 1. 1 ntroduction............................................................................................................................... I A. Project Description.................... ................................................................................... I B. Purpose and Scope of the Study.................................................................................... 4 C. Methodologies....,.......................................................................................................... 4 1. Capacity Analysis MethodoIogy....................................................................... 4 2. Trip Generation................................................................................................. 5 it. Existing;Conditions...................................................................................................................6 A. Roadways......................................................................................................................6 B. Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Operating Conditions.................................6 1. Field Investigation and Data ColIection ........................................................... 6 2. DOT Traffic Count Data................................................................................... 7 3. Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic........................................................................ 7 4. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic........................................................................ 8 III. Future Traffic Conditions Without Project.____.................................................................... 8 A. Background Growth in Traffic...................................................................................... 8 B. 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis Without Project.............................................. 1 1 C. 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis Without Project.............................................. 3 1 IV. Traffic Impact Analysis With Project..................................................................................... 1 1 A. Site-Generated Traffic ........................................................................................___ 1 1 B. Proposed Traffic Mitigation Measure......................................................................... 14 C. 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Impact Analysis With Project....................................... 17 D. 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Impact Analysis With Project....................................... 17 1 Table of Contents (Cont'd.) Page V. Long-Range Traffic Conditions....................................... ...................................................... 19 A. Future Growth in Traffic......................................................... _................................ 19 13- 2030 Peak Hoerr Traffic Analysis.............................................................................., 19 C. 2040 Peak [four Traffic Analysis............................................................................... 23 VI. Recommendations and Conclusions.......................................................................•. ........29 A. Recommendations..........................................,.-„............................... 2 B. Conclusions.....................................................................................- 29 ii List of Fi(_1111.es F Figure1. Location Map........................................................................................................................2 Figure2. Site Pian................................................................................................................................3 Figure 3. Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic........................................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic.......................................................................................... 10 Figure 5. 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project-......-..........__............................................ 12 Figure 6. 2025 PM Peak Four Traffic Without Project..................................................................... 13 Figure 7. AM Peak Hour Site Traffic Assignment............................................................................ 15 Figure 8. PM Peak Hour Site Traffic Assignment............................................ _............................. 16 Figure 9. 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project..........................................__......................... 18 Figure 10. 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project........................................................................ 20 Figure It, 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project.................................................................. 21 Figure 12. 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project................................................................... 22 Figure 13. 2034 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project....................................................................... 24 Figure 14. 2034 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project........................................................................ 25 Figure 15. 2440 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project.................................................................. 26 Figure 16. 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project.................. Figure 17. 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project....................................................................... 28 Figure 18. 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project.___............ ............................................. 30 di TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PV UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 5-4-024:027 I. Introduction A. Project Description Kaupulehu Land, LLC is seeking a Change of Zone for its property in Kamuela, South Kohala, Hawaii from Agriculture to Commercial/Agriculture. The proposed Pu'ukapu Place will be located on the south side of Mainalahoa Highway, between Waikelehua Place and Ishihara Farm Road_ The 5.349-acre site is identified as Tax Map Key_ (3) 6-4- 024:027. Figure 1 depicts the project location and the study area. The 2.3-acre portion of the property, frothing Mamalahoa Highway, is planned to be subdivided into three(3) commercial lots. The proposed buildings for the commercial Iots total 23,400 square feet of gross leasable floor area (SFGLFA). Access to the three (3) commercial lots is proposed to be provided by two(2)driveways on Marnalahoa Highway, hereinafter referred to as the West Driveway and the Center Driveway. The two driveways will connect to a circulatory roadway, fronting Mamalahoa Highway, and will continue along the east and west sides of the commercial lots to a 78-stall shared parking lot, which will be located to the rear of the commercial subdivision to maintain the character created by the adjoining properties. The remaining portion of the property, which is located to the rear (south) of the commercial parking lot,will be subdivided into six(6)residential lots. Each of the six lots in the agricultural subdivision will contain up to two(2)dwelling units for a total of twelve (12) dwelling units. The project site currently contains two (2)dwelling units. Therefore, ten (10) additional dwelling units are proposed. Ishihara Farm Road, which is located along the east (Hilo) boundary of the property, will continue to provide access to the residential lots. Ishihara Farm Road will not }provide vehicular access to the commercial portion of the project. The proposed site plan is depicted on Figure 2. For the purpose of this Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update, the subject project is assumed to be built nut and fully occupied by the Year 2025. .. c N.o LO ' r• -7 i a .r • 1 w ■ � -a► ti ,-�- - 00 j VIP �- 46 CL tc r � N a ro - a� A m y] 2 k 31[swM 5 -- 9 II 1 li I 3 I I � I a m� O'CQ �m t m� 4 T r�� ] 4 • .TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezcning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 B. Purpose and Serape of the Study The Traffic Impact Analysis Report for the Proposed Pu'ukal2u Place Rezonin►('11AR) was prepared by The Traffic Management Consultant, dated February 28, 2018. The purpose of this study is to update the TZAR. This TZAR Update is prepared in accordance with the Hawaii County Code Chapter 25 Section 25-2-46 (Concurrency Requirements), The scope of the TZAR Update for the proposed project includes the following: I. Update the TZAR AM and PM peak hour traffic count data(2017)to current conditions. 2. Evaluate the updated traffic count data to establish the existing traffic conditions. 3. Develop trip generation characteristics of the subject project, using generally accepted teelmiques developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 4. Analyze the traffic impacts on Mamalahoa Highway funs the two (2) proposed access driveways, the existing access from Ishihara Farm Road, and at the adjacent intersections in the project area. 5. Recommend measures that would mitigate the traffic impacts identified in this traffic study. C. Methodologies 1. Capacity Analysis Methodology The highway capacity analysis, performed in this study, is based upon procedures presented in the Highway lway Capacily Manual, 6h Edition (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board, HCM defines the Level of Service (LOS) as "a quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures representing quality of service." HCM defines the six(h)Levels of Service from the traveler's perspective, ranging from the best LOS "A" to the worst LOS 'T". LOS translates the complex mathematical results of the highway capacity analysis into an A through F grading system to simplify the roadway performance for decision-makers, LOS's "A", "B", and "C" are considered satisfactory Levels of Service, LOS "D" is generally considered a "minimum acceptable" operating Level of Service, in accordance with the Hawaii County Code Concurrency Requirements. LOS's"E"and "F"are considered "worse than the acceptable" bevels of Service. Intersection LOS is primarily based upon the average delay (d) in seconds per vehicle (seclveh). Table 1 summarizes the HCM LOS criteria for unsignalixed traffic control. 4 TNIc Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2025 Table 1. Intersection Level of Service Criteria (11CM) LOS Delay d (seelveh) Description A d510 Control delay is minimal. li IOCdC15 Control delay is not significant. C 15CdC25 Stable operation. Queuing begins to occur. 1) 25<a:�35 Less stable condition. Increase in delays, decrease in travel speeds. 1; 35<d550 Unstable operation, significant delays. F d>50 High delays, extensive queuing. HC utilizes a peak hour factor,which converts the peak 15-in inLite traffic volume into an hourly volurne, For the purpose of this study, the peak hour traffic analysis is based directly upon the peak 15-minute traffic flows entering the study intersection, which are multiplied by four(4)to convert the 15-minute peak volumes into 60-minute peak volumes. Synchro is a traffic analysis software that was developed by Traf'ficware. Synchro is an intersection analysis program that is based upon the HCM methodology. Synchro was used to calculate the Levels of Service for the intersections in the project area. Worksheets for the capacity analysis, performed throughout this report, are compiled in the Appendix. 2. Trip Generation The trip generation methodology is based upon generally accepted techniques developed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and published in Trip Generation, I& Edition. The ITE trip rates were developed by correlating the total vehicle trip generation data with various activity/land use characteristics, such as the vehicle trips per hour(vph)per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. The trip generation characteristics for the proposed project are based upon the ITE trip rates for a shopping center and single-family detached housing, during the AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic. A portion of the PM peak hour trips generated by a shopping center is considered to be "pass-by" trips, i.e., traffic already on the roadway stopping at a "secondary" destination en route to its primary destination. The percentages of pass-by trips were correlated with the gross leasable floor areas of shopping centers, which were collected from traffic studies and compiled by ITE. The results of the analysis were published in the Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition, dated August 2014_ The percentage of pass-by trips is inversely proportional to the size of the shopping center,e.g.,a regional 5 TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Devised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 gftmnmmm� shopping center in ay be a primary destination with a low number of pass-by trips,while a neighborhood shopping center may be a secondary destination with a high pass-by trip percentage. About 54.5 percent of the total PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed 23,400 square foot neighborhood shopping center are expected to be pass-by trips,The AM peak hoar pass-by trip rate for a shopping center was not published by ITE. IL Existing Conditions A. Roadways Mamalahoa Highway is a two-way, two-lane, arterial County of Hawaii roadway, which is a continuation of the Hawaii Belt Road (State of Hawaii), Fronting the project site, Mamalahoa Highway provides a continuous two-way, left-turn lane (TWLTL) in the Highway median between Waikelehua Place and Ishihara Farm Road. The TWLTL functions as an exclusive left-turn lane by providing storage space in the median for vehicles turning left into private driveways and side streets along Mamalahoa Highway, The TWL TI, also functions as a median refuge lane to accommodate the vehicles turning left from the driveways and side streets onto the Highway. The posted speed hillit on Mamalahoa Highway in the vicinity of the project site is 30 miles per hour. Waikelehua Place is a two-way,two-lane local road,which is located to the west of the project site. Waikelehua Place is stop-controlled at its Tee-intersection with Mamalahoa I lighway. Mamalahoa Highway provides an exclusive left-turn lane at Waikelehua Place. Ishihara Fane Road is a two-way, two-lane local road, which provides the existing access to the project site along the east boundary of the property. Ishihara Farm Road is located about 174 feet west of Keaka Kea Place, opposite the driveway for Earl's Paauilo Store. Keaka Kea Place is a two-way, two-lane local road,which is located to the east of the project site. Keaka Kea Place is stop-controlled at its Tee-intersection with Mamalahoa Highway, At Keaka Kea Place,eastbound Mamalahoa Highway provides an exclusive left- turn lane, which extends back to the Ishihara Farm Road intersection. The existing median striping of the left-turn lane taper prohibits the left-turn movement from westbound Mamalahoa Highway into Ishihara farm Road. It also does not provide a median refuge lane for vehicles turning left from Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway. B. Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Operating Conditions 1. Field Investigation and Data Collection The CCVID-19 pandemic shutdown has dramatically reduced the peak hour commuter traffic, school trips, and visitor traffic in Waimea. As such, the existing traffic conditions were based upon the pre-pandemic peak hour traffic count data, which were collected for the TZAR. Turning movement traffic count surveys were conducted at the intersection of Mamalahoa Highway and Keaka Kea Place on December 5-7, 2417, during the peak periods of weekday traffic — from 6:30 AM to 6 P a TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 9:00 AM and from 3:40 PM to 6:00 PM. Turning movement traffic count surveys were conducted at the Waikelehua Place and the Ishihara Farm Road/Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway intersections with Mamalahoa Highway on December 7-8, 2017, during the peak periods of weekday traffic - from 6:30 AM to 9;00 AM and from 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The traffic count data are presented in the Appendix. 2. DOT Traffic Count Data The 2017 traffic count data, which were collected for the TIAR, were updated to estimate current conditions. The most recent available traffic count data on Mamalalloa Highway were obtained from the State of IIawaii Department ofTri nsportation(DOT). The DOT traffic count station is described as Mamalahoa f-lighway, Mana road to Pualalea Place. The DOT traffic count station (Site ID: B71001905469) is located on Mamalahoa Highway, about 0.9 mile east of Keaka Kea Place. The DOT data were collected on October 22-23,2019. The DOT peak hour traffic data were averaged over the two-day survey. Table 2 compares the TIAR peak hour traffic count data on Mamalahoa Highway, east of Keaka Kea Place, and the DOT peak hour traffic count data in vehicles per hour{vph),total for both directions. Table 2. Mamalahoa 1-1igh-vvay Peak I I o u r Traffic Count Data Data Source Date AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour TIAR 1215-7117 1,362 1,562 DOT 10122-23119 1,308 1,411 change -2,0% -4.8% The 2019 DOT peak hour data on Mamalahoa Highway were lower than the 2017 TIAR traffic count data. Based upon the most recent available DOT traffic count data on Mamalahoa Highway, the 2017 TIAR traffic count data were assumed to be representative of the existing peak hour traffic conditions. 3. Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic The existing AM peak hour of traffic occurred from 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM on Marrialahoa Highway, Mamalahoa Highway carried about 1,400 vph, total for both directions, with a two-to-ane split in the westbound direction. Waikelehua Place carried about 40 vph,total for both directions, while Keaka Kea Place carried over 100 vph. Ishihara F'ann Road carried 4 vph, while Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway carried 36 vph,total for both directions. During the existing AM peak hour of traffic, Waikelehua Place operated at LOS"C" at Mamalahoa Highway. The left-turn movement on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Waikelehua Place operated at LOS "B". 7 TMc Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 Ishihara Farm Road and Carl's Paauilo Store Driveway operated at LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway. The left-turns movement on eastbound Mamalahoa I Iighway into Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway operated at LOS "B". Keaka Kea Place operated at LOS "C"at Mamalahoa Highway,during the existing AM peak hour of traffic. The left-turn movement on eastbound Manialahoa Highway into Keaka Kea Place operated at LOS"B". The existing AM peak dour traffic volumes are depicted on Figure 3. 4. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic The existing PM peak hour of traffic on Mamalahoa Highway occurred from 3:45 PM to 4:45 PM. Mamalahoa Highway carried about 1,600 vph, total for both directions,with a two-to-one split in the eastbound direction. Waikelehua Place carried 25 vph, total for both directions,while Keaka Kea Place carried over 150 vph. Ishihara Farm Road carried 4 vph, while Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway carried 25 vph,total for froth directions. During the existing PM peak hour of tragic, Waikelehua Place operated at LOS "B"at Mamalahoa Highway,while the left-tuns movement from eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Waikelehua Place operated at LOS "A". Ishihara Faun Road and Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway operated at LOS's"C"and "D",respectively,during the existing PM peak hourof traffic. The left-turn movement on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway operated at LOS "A" Keaka Kea Place operated at LOS"C"at Mamalahoa Highway. during the existing PM peak ]tour of traffic, The left-turn movement on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Keaka Kea Place operated at LOS "A". Figure 4 depicts the existing PM peak hour traffic volumes. Ill. Future Traffic Conditions Without Project A. Background Growth in Traffic The Federal-Aid-Highways 2035 Transportation_Plan for the District of Hawaii (TPDH)was prepared for the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation(DOT), in July 2014, in cooperation with the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works and Planning Department. The TPDH developed long-range travel forecasts, which provides the basis for the development of future land transportation facilities on Hawaii Island. The TPDH estimated that the vehicle trips generated from the South Kohala region are expected to increase at an average annual rate of 2.4 percent. 8 m d SIP z CD Id ea}{ evaA + 16-0 R 66y N r Jor 1s�i�ara Farm R� ��res flwy par M Lo C3 15� � V_ N 3 x x m 0. rn .y W ['1 a _rn LL r CO Id enyaj@�!eM + 9'0 R T 17y CN r-_ a � Q _cu �j c6 b q T S � o m a z° as co � Ln E . Lo Id eat A� + 35-* 64ti CDrn LO w1 LO CD Ishihara�arm R� rn 0 x Y R Q1 CL a 4 0 a .N d 3 p1 lL F� co Id enyal@VeM 7 y 2-w R '� CD `3 0 a � sa = w co D co �� m ■ ■ TINC Pu'ukapu Place Rexonirog Revise, Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 7--_ � _= f_t-a-1 For the purpose of this analysis, a growth factor of 1.12 was uniformly applied to the existing AM and F Nt peak hour traffic voItime s to estimate the Year 2025 peak lux:r traffic volumes without the proposed project, B. 2025 AM Peak Hour TrafTrc Analysis Without Project During the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project, Waikelehua PIace is expected to operate at LDS "D"at Mamalahoa Highway, The left-turn movement from eastbound Mamalahoa Highway is expected to continue to operate at LOS "B". Ishihara Farm Road is expected to continue to operate at LOS"C",while Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway is expected to operate at LOS "D" at Mamalahoa Ilighway, during the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project. The left-turn movement oil eastbound Mamalahoa I-1ighway into Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway is expected to operate at LOS "B" Keaka Kea Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway, during the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project. The left- turn movement on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Keaka Kea Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "B". The 2025 AM peak hour traffic volumes without the proposed project are depicted on Figure 5. C. 2025 PM Peal: hour Traffic Analysis Without Project Waikelehua Place is expected to operate at LOS "C"at Mamalahoa Highway, during the 2025 PM peak hour of tragic without the proposed project. The left-turn movement from eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Waikelehua Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "A". During the 2025 PM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project, Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway is expected to operate at LOS "E"at Mamalahoa Highway,while Ishihara Farm Road is expected to continue to operate at LOS"C". Keaka Kea Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway, during the 2025 PM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project. Figure 6 depicts the 2025 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the proposed project. 1V. Traffic Impact Analysis With Project A. Site-Generated Traffic The trip generation for the commercial portion of the project is based upon the ITE trip rates for a shopping center,totaling 23,400 SFGLFA. The ITE trip generation analysis of shopping centers included neighborhood centers, community centers, as well as regional centers_ These shopping centers contained non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, batiks, health clubs, and recreational facilities. 7� p9 7T a h m N Iq m _a E 1$'r 74- CV) My 00 � r J�r TL Ishihara farm Rd earl's DwY pa LO m vv .o 0 u w H 6 N Y d CL m a N O N I[f d 3 W T T T Id enyafa�ieM ►� y 10- R + 19-* co co T LO �a = G¢C �v � 0 E p m 00 T`-o ca id ea>j elea>l W + 3" R � 72y Ln co tt'r r co cv-r ? y �k r 1 a Ishihara arm Rd Ea�Cs❑WyQ� CIA�N r o a 3 Q M v : H j a x ' x m m 0. 0. vt N 0 N t9 _21 LI. Id EnyalaVL"M 2-w R T gti cern r � r � O 4� C S7 �� co 4� r � TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Re vised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 The trip generation for the agricultural portion of the project is analyzed as single- Family detached housing. It is assumed that up to two (2.) dwelling units (DU) will be constructed oil each lot to account for the possibility of developing all additional farm dwelling or ohana unit on each lot. Two dwellings already exist on the property. Therefore, the trip generation for the residential lots is based upon the ten (10) additional dwelling units. Table 3 summarizes the ITE trip rates for the proposed project. Table 3. Trip Generation Characteristics Land Use (ITE Cade) Unfits AM Peak Hour(vph) PM Peak Hour(vph) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Shopping Center 14 8 22 43 46 89 Total Trips(820) Shopping Center 23,4Q0 NIA NIA N/A 25 27 53 Pass-By Trips SFGLFA Shopping Center New 14 g 22 17 I9 36 Trips (Total—Pass-By) Single-Family Detached 10 DU 3 8 11 7 4 11 Units (2 10) Total New Trips 17 16 33 24 23 47 The proposed project is expected to generate net totals of 33 vph and 47 vph, during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic, respectively. The net AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed project are not expected to exceed the fifty (50) vehicles per hour trip generation threshold established by the Hawaii County Code Concurrency Requirements. The traffic assignments were based upon the origins and destinations trip distribution presented in the TPDH, where 89 percent of the trips originating in South Kohala were westbound and I 1 percent of the South Kohala trips were eastbound. Similarly, 89 percent of the trips destined for South Kohala originated from the west and 11 percent originated fTorn the east. The AM and PM peak hour site traffic assignments are depicted on Figures 7 and 8, respectively. B. Proposed Traffic Mitigation Measure The two-way, left-turn lane oil Mamalahoa Highway at Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway should be extended to the beginning of the exclusive left-turn lane at Keaka Kea Place in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD), published by the Federal Highways Administration, U. S. Department of Transportation. Figure 7 depicts the proposed median striping on Mamalahoa Highway at Ishihara Farm Road. 14 w - a� E w a Id ea}l EV29>1 ►g M� ��J ON �c7 Ishil�aca�r arm Rd o� Earl's DwY p O-m or* d E r£ " a" V_ R T ?r Center Dwy co ef7 m L a Q Z .Y. A d O_ RD a T West Dwy c� o�- ld enualaVEAA ►� y 4-0 1 T w 0 O til r �C �m Q m E a �� m • � 3 a� D E Id eaN E�ea}{ � +0-0 0-14 N Ishihara F arm Rd Da �ar1's D'rlY 04. �, 4�► d � k11 N a a East Dwy Irrco a R� _ �(r Y N W a n a C6 e Middle Dwy �i ►�g T if West Dwy o� Id enyalaj!eAA D# ro U (Q 0 La 4 m � 4 4 F TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update !November 5, 2420 Restriping the median taper on the left-turn lane on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway at Keaka Kea Place would extend the two-way, left-turn lane from Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway to the beginning of the left-turn storage lane at Keaka Kea Place. This proposed traffic mitigation measure would provide a storage lane for the left-turn movement into Ishihara Farm Road, and a median refuge lane for the left-turn movement from Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway. C. 2025 AM Peak Honr Traffic Impact Analysis With Project The proposed West and Center Driveways are expected to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service, i.e., LOS "C" or better, during the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. The left-turn movements from eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into each o f'the proposed access driveways are expected to operate at LOS "A", The proposed traffic mitigation measure of extending the two-way, left-turn lane on Mamalahoa Highway is expected to improve the traffic operations at Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway to LOS "C", during the 2025 AM peak hour of'trafiic with rile proposed project. Ishihara Farm Road is expected to operate at LOS "D". The left-tum movements into Ishihara Farm Road and Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway are expected to operate;at LOS 1113" and LOS "A", respectively, Waikelehua Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "D" at Mamalahoa Highway,during the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. The left-turn movement on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway at Waikelehua Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "B". Keaka Kea Place is expected to operate at LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway, during the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. The left-turn movement on eastbound Mamalahoa Highway into Keaka Kea Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS"B". The 2025 AM peak hour traffic with the proposed project is depicted on Figure 9. D. 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Impact Analysis With Project During the 2025 PM peak hour of tratFc with the proposed project,the proposed West and Center Driveways are expected to continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service. The left-turn movements from westbound Mamalahoa Highway into each of the proposed access driveways are expected to operate at LOS "13". Ishihara Farm Road is expected to continue to operate at LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway,during the 2025 PM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway is expected to improve to LOS "C", as a result of the proposed restriping of the existing median taper on Mamalahoa Highway to a two-way, left-turn lane. The left- turn movements from eastbound and westbound Mamalahoa Highway into Earl's Paauilo Driveway and Ishihara Farm Road are expected to operate at LOS "A" and LOS "B", respectively. 17 0 >N m mL A m LO L 0 Id eat{ ENeaN �T 18-w R 74-w C)to co Cn T r �3 r r- A-0 r� ,,Whara F atm Rd EafVs flwy o-* LOC)n 17 -* U-) cq r I d 51 R r L /re V r Center Dwy CO LO L CL Lo tr] a r iy �. R0 Art m ii West Dwy co co r r r Id enyajaj!eAA y 1 omw R 1co 00 `-LO a ne N M C1 R m E �� m TMG Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Repoit Update November 5, 2020 Waikelehua Place is expected to operate at LOS "C" at Matnalahoa highway, during the 2025 PM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. The left-turn movement nil eastbound Mamalahoa Highway at Waikelehua Place is expected to continue to operate at LOS "A". The intersection of Keaka ilea Place and Mamalahoa highway is expected to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service,during the 2025 PM peak hour oftraffic with the proposed project. Figure 10 depicts the 2025 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. V. Long-Range Traffic Analysis A. Future Growth in Traffic The proposed project is expected to be fully built out and occupied by rile Year 2025. The trip generation is assumed to remain constant beyond the Year 2025, However, the Hawaii County Coticurrency Requirements include the analysis of ten-year (2030) and twenty-year (2040) traffic projections for future growth in the project area, which are beyond the development time frame of the proposed project, The TPDIJ developed long- range travel forecasts for Hawaii Island to the Year 203S. The average annual growth rate of 2.0 percent vehicle trips generated in the South Kohaln region was extrapolated to the Year 2040. Growth factors of 1.22 and 1.42 were Uniformly applied to the existing AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes to estimate the Years 2030 and 2040 without the proposed project, respectively. B. 2030 Peak Hour Traffic Analysis I, 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis Without Project During the 2030 AM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project,Waikelehua Place is expected to operate at LOS "D"at Mamalahoa Highway. Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway also is expected to operate at LOS"D",while Ishihara Farrn Road is expected to operate at LOS"C". Keaka Kea Place is expected to operate at LOS "D". The 2030 AM peak hour traffic volumes without the proposed project are depicted on Figure 11. 2. 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis Without Project The Ishihara Farm Road and Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway are expected to operate at LOS "C" and LDS "F" at Mamalahoa Highway, respectively, during the 2030 PM peak hour of traff=ic without the proposed project. The other intersections in the study area are expected to continue to operate at satisfactory Levels of Service. Figure 12 depicts the 2030 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the proposed project. 19 ca y'a N m A d z r f`00 .v- 39-0 39-0 R + 72-x MO) �r T- LO 0 14� N r5 lshiria,a arm Rd R T 14 earl's Dw'1 �,, �0 07 r is m r 'o L R6 s %k ►r£L R F it Center Dwy $ Y N d r d c y y1 R"q L ►r�L � a a a� iL j1 West Dwy LO t-- a)07 I— co Id enyaPWAA �d 2'r R '# m 9-A Cv)Q $ r 07 C.y ❑ m ❑ 4 � E 4 i- �ro a m U LO Y� Id eayl e�ea>{ 20-0 T 81-* mco r` Ln C) �2 pr1 Lshihata�arm�d EarC s DwY p� cRv LO o 18-* �CD .o a 3 0 U A 7 Z n Y R Qf 0. a 0 M a N d 3 Q1 LL LO Cif N r r ld enuapa !eAA d 11-0 R T 21 U-)0 U-) a� a m¢ � 4 4 Lp �� E m acu 0 E 0 Z � 0_D C"] ld e2>1 eNea>j ►� �Y 43-If 78y a7 U') Y N N�C7 <r0 a Ls�+para farm�� E3TV 5 DwY 0� M CD c% .o a` a n t v R F- CL a m a 4 [`7 d 4V N r 7 LL LO r Id enyajo�!eA 2-w R m 'I❑-W Ln v 8 Cv A 0 m� ca Fr E TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 3. 2030 AM Peak t I o n r Traffic Analysis With Project During the 2030 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed prnject, the West and Center Driveways are expected to operate at satisfactory Levels of Set-vice. Waikelchua Place, Ishihara f=arm Road, Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway,and Keaka Kea Place are expected to operate at LOS "D". The 2030 AM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project are depicted on Figure 13. 4. 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis With Project The West and Center Driveways are expected to operate at I..OS "D", during the 2030 PM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project, The Ishihara Farm Road and Earl's Paauilo Stare Driveway are expected to operate at LOS "D" and LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway, respectively. Waikelehua Place and Keaka Kea Place are expected to operate at LOS "C". Figure 14 depicts the 2030 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. C. 2040 Peak Hour Traffic Analysis 1. 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis Without Project Waikelehua Place and Keaka Kea Place are expected to operate at LOS "E" at Mamalahoa Highway, during the 2044 AM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project. Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway also is expected to operate at LOS "E", while Ishihara Farm Road is expected to operate at LOS"D". The 2040 AM peak hour traffic volumes without the proposed project are depicted on Figure 15. 2. 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis Without Project During the 2044 PM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project, Waikelehua Place is expected to operate at LOS "C"at Mamalahoa Highway_ Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway is expected to operate at LOS "F" at Matnalahoa Highway, while Ishiltara Farm Road is expected to operate at LOS"D". Keaka Kea Place is expected to operate at LOS "C" at Mamalahoa Highway, during the 2040 PM peak hour of traffic without the proposed project. The 2040 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the proposed project are depicted on Figure 16. 3. 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis With Proiect The West and Center Driveways are expected to operate at LOS"D"and LOS "C", respectively, during the 2040 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. Ishihara Farm Road and Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway are expected to operate at LOS "E" at Mamalahoa Highway. During the 2040 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project, Waikelehua Place and Keaka Kea Place are expected to continue to operate at LOS "E". The 2040 AM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project are depicted on Figure 17. 23 m m a P ZO# R 81 m am co m 0 m n A-0 .� �. PrB �sr;nara�ark'Rd 2� �ar1' fl'NY p-� (D co cv) Un m NcIJ a T Center Dwy 00 = ry L � a c] a N_ SI RO M y., N IrY bi r W 7 AM 4 West Dwy LL 00 LO C7 N r r Id enyala�leM r� � 'r R T 21 m LO ti ca c 4� r' a� M Id EaN eNea)l r� 43-0 R + 78-► rn oa T N T °a r41 ist�►rata�arm Ftd earl's DwY pa co co OD N T i; d C 2 N a `i r£I �_ V F It Center Dwy 02 cv a n a N � r--L ►�0 L eq P U. �r West Dwy ati co T nr T 00 m Id enyalaAleM + 2-w R ? 10-A U')+o T Q] � N Tr 5 a = C.N W ca �y Q d � a co r� • • N 6 �h m m a E m a N L"] 64 Id eaA e�2GA23-w►� R + 94-+ co Un m It cO CD�} �3 y.rT �0 1sl�inasa �arm Rd EaKti's pwY pa 0R0�CD 0 a` 0 V F 7 = r� Y ❑ a 0 Q H v `a rn Lei i� co N T T Id enyajaj!eM ►� 13-w 24y rco (0 o T� a a T C y .y m m� � L $ C4 H a x M �M E Id ea)q eA&BA 50-1 ►� T 91 r-� CO 00 CD 4 V �k r1 1s�►ihara �asm Rd �arCs Dwy �� toI—co a r U 3 n r d a a 0 v 4 N LO 4� L 7 a i.� N [o Id enual@N!e/\A 7+ 0 RT m 11� tiN �CO c � m� � 4 w M a� a �� 5 b 4 • '2 O a n m m E w a N �r Id �ea�{ e��eay{ rt y '0 3 T 94y oa r- ro N r- cO a v-4 +k �r8 �sriiriara Far Rd Earv-.D`NY p-*, oRo co m LO 21--* (v r� V W T e Center Dwy M LD o N r- x co co a cw] 2 I Q T-.-- 'k-0 rt? N d 3 T if West Dwy LL [D O r r !d engaja4leAA ►� 13a ►t T 24-+ r-ca m a E �r m TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Trac Impact Analysis Report Update November 5. 2020 4. 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic Analysis With Project During the 2040 PM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project, The West and Center Driveways are expected to operate at LOS "E" and LOS "D", respectively, during the 2040 PM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project, The Ishihara Farm Road and .Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway are expected to operate at LOS "D" at Mamalahoa Highway. Waikelehua Place and Keaka Kea Place are expected to operate at LOS "C" and LOS "D", respectively, at Matnalahoa Highway. Figure 18 depicts the 2040 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. VL Recommendations and Conclusions A. Recommendations The following traffic mitigation measures are recommended: d. The median taper on the left-turn lane on eastbound Marnalahoa Highway at Keaka Kea Place should be restri ped to extend the two-way,left-turd lane from Earl's Paauilo Store Driveway to the beginning of the left-tune lane at Keaka Kea Place, 2, Minimum 100-foot spacings should be provided between the intersections on Marnalahoa Highway at Waikeleliva Place, the West and Center Driveways, and Earl's Paauilo Store Drivewayllshiliara Farm Road. 3. A minimum of 25 feet distance should be provided between the edge of the circulatory road and the future widening of the travelway on Mamalahoa Highway. 4. Traffic signal warrant analysis should be considered at the Mamalahoa Highway intersections at Waikelehua Place and at Keaka Kea Place by the Year 2040. B. Conclusions The purpose of the existing two-way, left-torn lade in the median of Mamalahoa Highway is to accommodate the left-turn movements to and from private driveways, such as the West and Center Driveways proposed for this project. The recommended spacings between the proposed access driveways and the existing roadways along Mamalahoa Highway are expected to provide two-vehicle storage lengths in the two-way, left-turn lane for vehicles turning from Mamalahoa Highway into the project access driveways, and two-vehicle storage lengths for vehicles turning from the project access driveways. The recommended 25-Foot distance between the project circulatory road and the future widening of Mamalahoa Highway is expected to provide storage for one vehicle, waiting to enter the project site. 29 0 z � 00 CO 1d eek MON ►� 43-0 78,► rn oa ,-t r 04 r 00 04 O r E-0 ►� � Sl �cJ isnihara F arm Rd Eart'S Dwy�a co m OD A2-% N r v m CD p F Rs T ?f Center Dwy x [ten v ry � T � a 0 r 0 L N ►��b r m m w it West Dwy C)tl- 00 T CN T OD id enyaja,4ieM i R 1O-A LO LO cr) H m ca x� O I E a� r � TMC Pu'ukapu Place Rezoning Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Report Update November 5, 2020 Waikelehua Place, Ishihara Farni Road, and Keaka Kea Place are expected to operate at LOS "D",during the 2025 AM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. The West Driveway also is expected to operate at LOS"D", during the 2025 PM peak hour of traffic with the proposed project. The intersections in the study area are expected to continue to operate at LOS "D" or better through the Year 2030. LOS "D" is an acceptable Level of Service, and therefore, will not require traffic mitigation in accordance with the Hawaii County Code Concurrency Requirements. Table 4 summarizes the results of the capacity analysis. The net AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed Pu'Likapu Place are not expected to exceed the fifty(50)vehicles per hour trip generation threshold established by the Hawaii County Code Concurrency Requirements. The proposed Pu'ukapu Place rezoning in Kamucla, South Kohala, Hawaii Istand is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations on Mamalahoa Highway. 31 d� a N O �� a E - Q - 4 r� E n Q oo Q n E r 4 ri _¢ rl 4 a E C C C C G C ¢ e ¢ C L o C o C m z a m C rl n 17 w. r- r: c Q. w f W o_ d o C,r x :.+ c U o rs �-^ ❑ -- o i.i r. R r! ❑ o c U Co Ci P C• rn p 4 rJ P N G H G O G P m C Q Q d Q Q C C C Q C ¢ Q C Q Q C Q Q Q C Q Q z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z 2 x z z z z z C E E o C C ¢ E ¢ C u "x7 4 E C E C C E uU Q? p 4 C 6 ¢ ¢ ZXX z n6zzzzzz — c Z ZZZZZ — oZZZZZ Z ry c zz Z E_ P�,�x, zzzzzzzz zzzzzz zzzzzz¢ ¢ LCCEE ¢ dEzxz 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzxzzzzzzzzzzzzzzE ¢ Lz z z z zzzzzzz zzz z zzzzzzzzz z zz z a c C C C C M Q Q C C 4 Q c C C Q Q C C n Q C C Q Q C a3zzz4 - dzzzzzxz - zzzzzzQ - ozzzzzzQaczza R u a � LELCCCEEEEE � E � Q ¢ LEC � � E ¢ Q ¢ EQE ¢ E ¢ E ¢ � CE a ,wzzzz 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 'zz E E Co E E E Q C E C ¢ E E E C E C E ¢ [ E L E E E d Q E C E E Q@ E C L L E Q liwzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxzzzzzz u b Q 0. G � rl O co' + [A + J q J q J O ~ C J q L V V L d G iC '� K go w � L R d R � R 1 d cc El e vc 'fl �' cv ti a w ONa es eta' p, r ° r r .� �s A I °r c r °r vn 11i !w as ec a to ea w x�7 em tm ea as oc a C .q .0 i C a � L f¢ 4 A a A R R R R R q R R w Ai q a A a A p !! a� t E E E E 8 E E E E E t E E R ch H VI A Y7 at lG Y+ S z VI 4j b „a m aE 1 =x Y C 0.� WS Lr10. Nom. C b 4 m ry N m o u i C o ¢ C ¢ e S r{ Q ¢ C C [ L ¢ ¢ [ ¢ 4 z Z a z z Z ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ [ [ E ¢ C C E E zzzzZzz zzzzzz FC R a ;! U 4 U er g V vi n c U of G r Ln rdQZzzzzz c40 CD -- czzzzzz = - .a C C ¢ C E C d E [ d ¢ ¢ x z 'zzzzz zzz 'zzz l I Z7_ T.. z zzzzzz ZZZ LQ d [ Q d C ^i v; a c C C C U U r-� C.+ iC Z z z ra o -- o ri c z z 'z 7 z z ci c H c� C. Z z z MZ �'R C zzzzzzz zz ¢ E ¢ E E ¢ C C E E E d C d L E ¢ L L L d ¢ M1 ¢ L ¢ d rt3zzzzzzz7- z; zz 'zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 'zzz7 m ¢ E L L Q ¢ E a ¢ ¢ ¢ 3 z z z z z z z z z z z z 'x zz z z z z z `z z z 'z Z Z z z Z Z 7 a z z [ Coo ¢ °06 ¢ 0° 4 z 'zzz Z ;{ w Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z T Z z Z z z Z z a_ z z z z 0 Q ¢ ¢ C C d C C [ C E [ E C E E Q C E Q C E E C ZZzZZzzzZxzzzzzzzzzz 'zzzzzzzzzzz a ri OZZZZZz `� - o [ Cc � zZzzZZC@ � ¢ °' c R 7 � Gn r• i. mn 4 � a � G w � O � u w 91. a Q ge .r ° nt _- 3 GI x G •C � X R = 4 K _ 0 y 3 go = y s cc W E G a. _ � a, r r D 'o x u m o 0 ca E _ E E E E E h �1 cc A FFa�.p J Q� ryx3 Hx3 b q V N W O E 9G G C C ¢ d Q E x x a 7 C 7 z x d C cz E [ d ¢ EE rwn 7 Z Z z z z :2 -r r ry � � E ¢ 4 E C o a 'I v ❑ 4 0+ Q. - u o. r+ ❑ -- N Q r a ❑ a+ M r+ c r c N o c E ¢ ¢ E ¢ E zzzzz 'x � zzz Zzz 'zzx zzxzzz 'z 'zz f L CQ ^ Qe dd [ C4 V - 4 iy U ri 4 c Q oei a � 7 � Z racxx zz z 'xr+ oZz� 'zzZZ rrc rvc 1vc ; zZ m ¢ L a E 4 ¢ d c % Z z7- zxzz zzz 'zz7_ Z 'zz E E E C S E d 4 E d d C E Q Q E x x x 7_ z 7 z Z x c Z x x x x z z x z z' z x z x x z z z L E ¢ E Q L Q ¢ ¢ ¢ G E E C � 3zxz 'zzzzxzzzzxZzzz` zzz"zzzzzxzzzxzx E 3 C Q r- a ¢ Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ o E C Q C L 4 a m a + 4 ¢ ¢ z zz C °° aZxz zZdc' z z z z Q a0lr::5 a ¢ °� 6czZT- A wC [ ¢ [ d ¢ d d ¢ ¢ C ¢ ¢ E L ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ E Q Q 6 ¢ d 0 0 0 C ¢ ¢ ¢ cl x 'zzxzzzzzzzzzzz` 'zzzzZzzxi`zz 'xzzzzz 'zz `a QQ d L E d d d d E Q C E 4 E ¢ E w z z z z `z z z z z 2 z z x z z z x z[ x x z x z z z z z z Z z x z z 3 C E_ Q C A FC r i o !x ri c m - a C Q ¢ a, p E o, c m `'+ c z z Z x x z r+ c - c A F T G 1 o94 4 A R O a+ ld o _ p x � a 2E Y T x w z x . $ 0 6 w L lz m i '� rE E a [ E in 4H � m`m ° r• ^ma oC3 �3Ha Er Q x $ C a p u p' a u a 4 W N r O ry _[ C C rs C_ vi E_ ry @ N _¢ z C a z C Q z d a z C ^ z C ^ z d c z C y z q z 4 z C z V C d L d C L zzz 'zz rn K n ri ri [^ v M re L d C C [ L) rn C.r rn r' J.] Y• 1} oa u .c L` ri v Q n LC — a Lzzzzz — c — c -r6 +s o vc J C d d Q d d m zz �czZx a [ d Q C d C L C Q C d Q C C [ C C zzzz z `zzzzz ZZZZZZ Zzz E C C E Z 2ZRidR � � .. = ZZZZZZRcsazZzzzzQ 6zzz m C C C @ Q ¢ Q 4 C LCL E E C d E C z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 'z z m 6 C C C C C ¢ Q ¢ ¢ E ¢ C [ Q CLQ L Q C L :!5 C C 15Z C C E E C C C 3zx ;� zzxzzzzzz -xzzzzz � zz � z7- Zz 'x `z7- zx 9 z z C ¢ C ¢ C E C C [ d C C L d C d C L L L C C C L C C C C C C U 3 Z z z z z z z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z z z x z z Z z Z z z .i3 e � EE '{ r1rv � CAr5 � P7 �� o d Cd LEL Lc � [ CCC CC Cc CC C - d Z z z z z z n z z z t' 09 u C ¢ L [ C C w z z z z z z Z x z Z z ;z z z z z z z z z z Z z z z z Z z Z z Z Z 0 C' m ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ C ¢ Q ¢ C E Q C C CCC LLC 4 C C CCC @ [ C C ¢ Q 4 � wzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzxxzzzzzzzzzzz d m ¢ oo c E C C L E@ L L v+ c dm m ..; m .� m o m a F v � a u g u tit w O cxaAa � ' a Aa ca aa i ,3 -1 a M 't z� x all. x a Y V V Y ID �i,- S a c �_ a o c C E E E r w` 6 01 m� O a i c w c P L e o b q a E a Q r C ry d rad a d _4 -, C ra Q �+ G a z d p ¢ p z ¢ rl Z Q C Z Q 4 x Q O Z [ ^^ Z C H z ¢ Q Q C C [ G C cin z z z z z z z z z z F Qd _C _QCC � +r r� •i -? CCC C CC n r+ w � _ V.' -� V zz zzZZ -- o2zZZ 2 Z rrc .tea aaC 3 a � 6 C C [ [ 13<t 4 Q C C Q G 4:,Z z z z 7 Z p a o � zz zzzzzz zzz Zz U y o u1 0� C d d = C ¢ w r x C] !r C ri [ E C zzzZ r-io rio xzzzzz = a .- oZZz d C Q [ G QUC [ C d [ Q d E � v v � � c [ [ Q C C [ d C d d L d C C C [ d C C d L C [ d C C C d d C F E Z z z z z Z Z Z 7 z z `z Z T Z z z z z Z Z 2 z 2 Z Z Z z Z z E F •om Q CCdC d dQ 451: ¢ d ddCGCd -45 C5 ¢ EC aFa �? 3zzzzzzzzzz7z `zxzzzazzzzzzzzz 'xzzz 27 oo � w n E + z zz ° CQ c Q � aZ xZxzzw o 07P c °5 CSz zzz L C `y 333 w w7 z z z z Z z `x Z z 7 `z Z z z z z `z z z z Z z z z z Z z z z z P C' E F" [ [ �* [ C Q C [ G [ [ Q Q [ --5 [ d Q Q C Q [ C [ [ [ [ [ [ [ E w z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z Z z z 'z z z Z z z z z Z z` z CLC C z0 W [Y] C1 n � G7 o r? w - 2ZzzZZ -- c rc - cx"zzzzz -- o -- a [s7 U. u �!. y vi w v :n R v 'n R v +n rii 7r u '1' m u m ❑ ❑ � - vim ❑ � - ❑ � ; ❑ ,, , cam - ❑ � --", o � ; a ., ; ❑ � �r- c a a w Is q1j c $ w Yl cc 3 c w � � e .122 a 't'� it = r q a a E r E E 3 u F 3 u F w c LU .e •o u U C[ c J 4 � yy � ❑ � �Fd a [_� ��a�a n E w 4 c of 7 ❑�Fj�- V N�r� N T.� .0..-I❑ j F TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PV UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-424:027 APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA 61 H O ro m A E CM M n n M W a � m m mao CLQ {7 Y A 4 7 C� m W M 0OZ ti y N 9� Y1 N I+ M N P N N v� N N m (p n trri p c 0 Fn am r � A N V P p M N M O � N d M u b d p � v�J Ol d - � M � 'M.' � g ❑ 0 O 0 � m fY t N p p ¢ p g o CIO G -10 O d 60 o Ci b P d b O -111-111 bd db d b O b - - N N [� M � n] t� i0 O !� M1 p �• b Y G - Y - N tytylj � tl� tL Y M r _ rs N g r p p12 MI w r min E > pp [ryy �pp p m mwCD cl C co a ti C i S- �o f" p P P d d O d P 0 d b T.- p .11-1-1- vo4p o o p o 0 4 o 7T 0 Q y _ a vtl d M1 H v F n y b _ v N �y yy oo TT ��pp Mp A E w o Y N N Y N r N a m P p g q E b H P d O r d d b '3 o b b v v p v o g o 4 P 4 d 4 0 p p A r p O a d Q 7 ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ r ¢ ¢ ¢ a �- r '� t � M n oi m = 4 4 4 4 = n in �i h = In 0 m = r :; r- r- x vd ec � � x c7 T O L R ro E 34 A J t Q] x_q 74 7N w0. terry OM Ck Z C L7 61 O.� EWp otowa r�W r,4 Nwr iwa� Fail •Mx Im, ]310 +1W MGA 71 74 7e 4v 15 L o C L 6 m" KW HOT 17 lbs e o x n o 0 a o 0 o e o a v o 0 1f f'A] 0 R Pi in IiT Ppy C p my 4j 'I L �m 9 N L)a n m a wE V 3 � Em ow 20 DI ^ "� 17 �] 0� 6 o co Q 11 t cm 1 in il r gin P O 0 E 0 0 0 o e x o P c u n .tie sw h!E e o e 6 0 N M bf tB0! [Ff GC.[ 87%!+H 4WM�11 ! { \3\ ■ ; - (2% jbin ■ , � � „ : M • § ° » © : Eo=m J §» s = ! ate 3G${ E o � " 9 � & \S m �S $2 £ S/ k 2k k / § d/ �/ {3 99 f § /caE 6� \cc 5 � � E � f ! e , e % 0F7 f _ E g 2=\ (\� FE: 'T 2202 §aR) oEnUla �--- 21 is ` — a 0 Cl) §� §k 4j » Lt 3 )a 2:3 |° "m\ §fl= , ��,; ° ..� k � ! { kcm d k% M ' » I 4)f k§ 2 § _CD IVI +1 f K in 11 u Od % 0 � ! . I | 9 E / ���� � ! � . ■ , § m � � , � e . , / L ci _ CL �s§ z2;) 4- al o««� 7 !` R ® ! # � • ! | ie � ` : 0 2 _ 9 � § — 72 � 2 @ ƒ3 99 \ | r f* } f ! ) � ! 't < < < 3fi lf | . - ! u � ! ! -IT ! £ ) a z 4 [6 E IL Ql 81 aO X aN x �p dam m Z OpZ =U tm '01! T U VlN0. yea - ispe 5 16 e o c an m �eea 0 1e o o [h 0 1e o o P P o 0 0 0 --2- 7h -n ur mo Q oe uu rn � U•; m@J e � w d3 p 3 d)N �[rC3 �-, o� p 32 a gg qq Y N N _ 4Wa m clcl =Y CcO 0 41 T F rCO ,� 4, 0 in P G e P 6 Q P P o P P o 8 7 0 0 u o I31 C [l[L 4e m ¢ 3 n o v a �r [rc l Cpl •'w3 Y�7 usi wi.ee..�ww r m c [tl t LL 1� P O 9 v G d o p g p p P P b tl tl c g a p d d Q - N �37 CW C N. C U�Z n p Q n •1 N - n m v N o n r- ti d r UViG7a E 7 o P a 6 d d d d P P P Q p O 6 6 O 4 Q 4 K � G a F r o p p g Q p p d a p p p CIO O O b c P d Q p q p ey L F- - E n � a Q o v o � a d .- r q r o p o a r• � b N o Q d c � � .n &i p o C V1 lu Q7_ L].N zO F N d M1 M n N P b .M35 m o N o p p Q P � N � L q N N N ti S m m tl tO T b p 0 r o o g o b P p b Q b P p g p Q Q b 7 a T PD P a p a c] C G Q g Q p 3 a Z oe yy pmp po p y �p F +l+ � E E F p P P R G . 4 C b d o g P O p b o O 4 � S N M K c S "-' P " � S � '° R x 0 ee 2 ccl2 E m34 r a!i M Y rq wo' N�rq 7— a1 C6 m N 2 0 Z corm P N W c C3wom, mamseanw Hwy I W N [>,1 rM.• Tool 3443 x,131 692+ BA i0 154 3E 54 B2 3615 ]S56 7170 22 3707 2 9 3 57 0 0 D u a a a! 3p a a sr rn a urUt .. a a w l 4 CC6 IT Cc, H^. e g o q j� � � • v '� V _ ❑ �q O r y E R g e v m a O w n C O¢ v O v e { F�.- w �» v v rl ►J ,m LSA 1' �ii urn ma Ae� P ltID LO MOD m les m 7 t11 F m 1n L� �C3 to N o 1! 0 1s not r 0 0 A[ 0 0 6 EC 0 a s5 G9Ff -au. cNot vat t6 iC K V. [Y B9 M9 EzSE 03K I�lv1 +01u3 nx3 �a3�A"veyqpwr{ry � | V CL ■2m ; k , b � � , e k/k)2z \ � � � - • � ototoCL t7 }a. } ] r . . . § . . � R ) ) k ` w5 j= » £J }§ ) §, j (§ 02k / 5 ! § x ! § 2 § § 2 � : � : 2i � \ w � 7 ci | \ mklA7 § § ■ | nom ® ; � - o ; ■ � q � � © � g ` ) ! ` � , � q ■ ; 2 � ! ) § • © � � . � � ! • _ | f 2 § 2ir | ` } » � � � T 3 z R m E m Elf 6r LL r 0 7b ,cCCQ Nx n �O 7 M mar a OOZ CU a(D m O F' N UV1N0. MWAWM.r INy iwt3j fvl Eltw Tool 971 561 m27 2i 5 27 B 6 It 1667 661 1667 2 599 0 0 Q G 5 9 Q co Q 6 0 0 P S59 0 0 u RT Sk 6i Ji C ap +J 4 3Q m u C 6i(b p d p o j R3 It v v P C N .r P 'R cl ti x d m co mncu fad rk 3ry gaoe Y pg^pp .5a oP � ^W �m ;� P p p n 4ga �3c j P P g d LL_ In Ti- wi la p 6 u 4" t 0 0 6 Q Q a u a 0 I it sm Z C C PS& n.ft ors rL a s Lt ZZ p i4Q1 .96 Q90 lvod +u.j la3 ia31"116amtm—vt k kFp _ � � LL w 2�e ¢�\y § 0 )}R) § � � ! ) R / ■ ci � (j �\ --c }� \04 ; §� f2 ƒ �� 2 e i , £ 000 > | | l2 ; ; r2222b ; 22 : � �£ / : ci ! � ■ & ! ! e � � f ! ; f i6 � ƒ ! � ! I - � ® ! a z w 0 m E m v m t1 m � m Y w an 7 N lD Zgate m UrnSnfi 41i.nwi�Lno4 Hry[rvul CA Emm.. T.Im 434) 617 1x7, 15 17 U 6 10 26 C 450 "it f311 C Q U7 I !i Q i15 0 0 11 Q 19 0 0 f` E m 1 0 v RT Th GT Ur E 0 � � Ut D- �C) M u 0 m mOt IU- W m v fd n C Lq N ec � •'� ^ n � Q � � 1p � 3 . 2 Q ro c �Lt° Je q =own yr IGS A W a co � m� aPp E Q 0-0 rl h t r► � in li a wl lu 11 El Div e 0 0 0 6 0 0 it 0 0 C4 SF 0 i OPT6 Is* 'uIr 9Z 4 HL li sl PL OAiI 9�ro toil •Pi6� ..w3 .3 ��� 4"IMF,-VA • ■ ryry �y to �y pp I ry� ��pp I M M z 0 c � mm ryry �p Q. Y �^ ca 3 c � IXV n m'gnn ��nl _ c,L a m w d tl p C 0 Q N M 61 ' T p N m M m V N N '- M Q! ' e! m ''i f'i N 6 g m r q ❑ p� LO to 0. d rn N N � 4 N O� m � N Y V i� � .- ap •n N n v� n N � i � Q Q+ M N � rn E b b b d d o o p p b b p o p g a Q Q d p p o o O Q Q b b o o p ❑ Q Q a 3 SV a1 4 4 M1 i� � M r a] ff W pW � 4• n G [Vrvv n M ^ �O my Y� O rry� Y1 v W eeyy 1� �+ 4 p rn$ [9 e y N�� Q] R e Y ^ M a •n a ^ ^ p n Q n a N o n r m Q o m min �E Q q N f6 ptm jE r N v0 e0 i'i N N H ^ n It� L a,r Q c O a o o g p Q a tl b o p q p p O b a a t�t O P O a It p p P p p a b b d o 2 � A 6 ry rn N H � N eM1•e N N � t%v N N S G• • 17 � � N � a � � � b N o N O n! N m N � n�p 0 �y a 0. S a N � N ry C N H 1� d � N M N m M >" � m 0 w � H � iD P W o w • N p N N r M1 t0 N i g [V G F a 4 p w Q b o ❑ Q o a -10101- gqp P a -10 o p q O p a a 0111 g p a a i a aate, c m = r� t� q,r n � � ou ra oo = m M n r•� ri a v a 7l ; 2 ' ! § $ 2 ; « « § B « § « § f • • 7 [ 2 = e ; . • - R � ■ , R � ■ � = ma � ; , pa ■ £ : § | � ; � _ � , - - . � • � n % � : a ; aee2 , � § § ; k § � : ` : � � g2 § ■ ! ! § = . ; m . ; = . ; $ � ' $ | . _ l = ' ' • • _ , , , ' ! lRB . � ; ■ ; = � � , & s ! . » � - 22@ ■ • ; R ■ ; m § Bmb § 2 � § [ § ( ( [ _ ■ : • ■ B § G ' ; , ; „ # ! ; § G » EE | § § B ( 212 : • , . . 22 . 2 , x - , . � � � _ � . . . = ■ : Q ; 2 - = ` ; • • ' ' 00a0 , 000Q Q , ; ; � § , : , : , , . . r,a .6 2 to� lf2 : l � � � f . , . . l � . � . | s� x R O W W E R a W m � x K 3� 3[V W CUP 6 �UUry UmV70. rv.m.mq.l+rr M'PI C� Ervn Tqy T151 e611 f3iM v oe n7 u e¢ ue a I v P o 0 N II FAIN S41M dRT�: NN9 C v ti a a o v o v 0 P 9 1 !7 T 1 Peq E m r- o j cl U N p O � Vl a�d a >>J= e W _co m In �~ P� +I T C� 'r 1� it W ad i R:[ ilat a 0 0 o N n � a 0 1 yy a L ii[ savo 7 will i1,� c4a 6 v o � e 1 LSI it ei mi !I• L eiill [iii leli ploy AN] �'7 I9 it Wf�1�wII � � ^ ! k{§ fl- 'i 'BI \�f& u3ez � § ■ 2 � , ce . . ■ 2l7 � . # � t � E ■ ® . , , , , CD 9 � C c ! )§ 22 \ .� ❑ o ! j\ �ƒ 0 } k ) - � � � . - ; & � q � : © ; ' �{ w §i }§ $) 2N \ !0 3 �} §) $ � )° c ; ; K ® • © 7 / ) , � ; ; _ - 22 ; = : ® - - • k f � ■ � \ � k � a { m -. ! } 2 ƒ \ ƒ ) ! ! ! E | ) � ! af 1? t F ro Y r' M }o x Q,Ly d m x n k Ln m 202 cU m 7 lu pp c=..16 U CO to CL 10.-rwnl u.]lNbl rr ctia r=r� �o5v in iss s Ip 1 1 e 7 0 1111 Ii} len ^C •]I 0 0 1 0 Q o v o co E X1 Th LT pm 41 Ll' am � a3 O v cam 0N 4T o0 0.. oa a —t to $�L m yp ff a P R s T a 00 m W 7 L? _" =q l h t E y an ]i u .ea Ok r u not e o s o a i e e n z it rrnl � � 91r1 mI RS 3.. o v o 6 6 1 1 O Il Mil [loi [LC •let a'+u] W] il;]Na KM�•T £ � 2 & r ! � 22 [ [ ■ lp = m £ % am � � * ]g§ ! «�\ t{�e � « 2OOZcl s \ A 3 • 4a.Ja . « « m n m § . £f 4- CN �3 f� A2 cc }§ E � * �- / � ■ lq . 2K § ke ; • ` \ f , a ■ � � s � | � ! l , � � � : ; ■ „ � ! ] k � a � � s m Q t R m W CL R M a0 x aN Gr y n d QI LI.� a�oz EU m c o-'�°m U0enCL M. Via fl.vtm" art wf ns+ 9 0 O y o n ns sfr nz ew t o lf7 o u o y r y is o o r 0 0 0 A 0 O 0 0 PH � � ❑ [7 _ 1n q'i VT npq n C 60T 1 LtLL Obi o � w C1 N Q 6 r wca 0 Q Q+ m m¢�� c n f S 3 mL _N a) vma d Q m m y 1�cc 3� C a m°tr h ? E fl f' Cao m it .0 w Q3 o rr nr o 7 e 0 0 U 6 ( 0 P � 0 � P er to c C_ C wr+ est w 0 0 0 0 o u we x wc+ so. sw 04W'-3 d !0 rl MHS W�ry £ $ ` ~ J ® «� ! )§k _ ooz \\tf f ƒ 7 � , • ch onm= ■ � � , � � ® ® § � , � � � m ■) k§ a % )� ¥ ❑ a k§ ) f ! § )/ %Ne % 02v rl � - - - --— ; , . ; � : • /I =2 � QD \f k2 t ( )* > lw J • a , ; § , lw $ � ! � ; ; ■ � . � ! ! � | ` ! ■ • f � � � k ! ° E � a x 0 ro w y�if1 7 N Gi W 0 00- — Z U QP sr Un]U70. 4Y1�N�G W![YM] E•i E�1r 3 0 � 0 0 � 1n1 p+ +1p 1i F Sly 6 0 t(] 0 9 0 0 v o 0 0 cn --- yr r w 0 41 N 00 (V om 31 ❑ co jr- CL flY m0 C' C F°r 3"' N F q� in i+ aad e a No 1 7 c o o O 6 0 1 0 C f ! D !Y ED D *Ifs will aw L e o o M... f { 5mm72 § § § ■ Q2 : • 7 � I � 2k ! \\/& oG=z ! Q } SnEQm . - q � J § §§ ■� /2 f ! �) $f k ! # $ � � , � � e � ■ � J � � , , . } IF 22 � ! £i k� }� }\ § 0 t > 0 ] � „ ; ; � , a . o , , , . , r } f , § ( E / « © „ ] 00 � } } J ! � ! ■ ! k ! � ' ■ | 72 ] \ r ! � ; 1 s� r 0 c m m E- B a s4 Y r` II'n ao 7 N W0.P ram o opz ctit:ro UNma u+�wd mn mm 7� •z 31 1s s au Q a o � C tf1 f1t 17ff Q 5 f1, 0 0 LO o r o a r e o a o 0 o e o ❑ C pp +j C13 Oen W ❑ U� ON p _ ch .� mN ti3 $s. s 0 rn5 ^gym zED y+ �M GOD 5 1? QC.� E1 0 4 L T C 2 1r1 i1 a wd [�] I tx 1sr o > o n c 0 ❑ o a o '� ye iie C C m1 fw fx � ❑ ❑ o F e o oz 3� s CpF� der rtr �fpi '4 J �r3 16]I�W�'a4T�Y1 J lv r l Q r.i ry I W Q W O C o F a g a o ,p a p h u. u �o a 0. C G iw oC C 0 l[] V oo V LO N p R 4 6 HJ S[] ¢ 0 fl- Ln Cl l(1 O Ct G a 41 L9 f+l nl V �n vT 1:v In Q to Lo O S? P C Ln 4 M fy V a V P q a ry N b CO Q Q G1 m m V p M W ' �D m Q� 7� Q C7 en V, M G rri v r+i m r= c F o a ¢0 .n ca o 0 0 0 Ln 0 w = `.1 w L1J Y w Q T W p a F d 0, w � w � 'ff a �,,,� � a w ¢0 4 � o Li. r 0. O oC "' 4 a Z A A a A AC r c 2 cc � Q o C p w 2 T 2 ry A X = rt D Q n C r� C f] U H U x ae v Q Y x 4 u x 5e U `� w as w a Q m w LL q Q a Ne O a p a �a�` �.e A i S a W o Ln Ln O ¢ m N a a It p n a tl D. n- u m .e 4 H N ci " 2 S ¢ R a ry A R vs p um a — d m +a ¢ J ti � I n w m 7 x F 1pJ in N cO o0 4 to R �I a M n N Ga 0 a ¢ a n � LU V1 4 � LA D O G[ N z N + I �l f1 N V N LAa 13 m N V ❑ i m OC o ii o ry 8 rD R O w a w p T col LA In a o ¢ ko a a v, F a ❑ a a o 'n Q q a 0 ix cm O ix ne LO r w L v Z LC r• Ce rti 1A 'F� QO ¢ + n o vii p o r C p uNi o Ln Q rIj Iv D 4 N 2 4 rn o _ M Q0 W w LLP ix ~ rV N o � m _ a w w J eQ a w pe [L ao Q J �^ LN _1 w Y w a 2 P > a ua1 7 c ¢ t 7 a C o W aC d a 4' G ar K a ul D G. w ll w W dr A S S ¢ S x OC 2 2 H J J --� N N n ¢ 0 u 4J7 W �'�' 0 W W n p� W LL �. 2� K o CC fL' d -O N A_ a 3c ❑ 4 CL Q a. a se R 2 S S S T `p a a o p a c w g W g O ¢ u, aao uE. ro U O ¢ Q Q ¢ Q d a Q Q Q 4 2 a s a s a+ In eQo N � i'n LL Q o A Q ~ 2 R ¢ ry a v N lu n en M jc - Nr m N m r Q1 [V co d m r 7 rn m v m o m en m oq n m rn ry .? . r ol rn 4 m v m vI m m n 1cnn f- m n 1n n 1n m n +.n r r r N N rMv m r N N n uz m fm ev Q r!'+ rrt 4 p N yr p p A H1 N d p N A A v1 Ln i d D 12 N 0 P rn en p m c? rT d A m M � d d r r M fr1 V 7k d A r r m In v V d 1D 16 1D n T- n r.- r` n n Go to co m ed CO 0i0 OD 01 a•V Q1 Q1 Ql 6+ M m d q q p d Cl O Q q d d p q d O p O O d d A d Q O Q p p d r M m U v m�rr o+ In rn m d 1n n N N rri N rr"V ry rtcv rmv ni m m m Q O1 4 M N T�fl �D r N N N Cl en Q� m D1 N N O 6 N Ln rll 7�r M O Q d V N LR • Q O N rl'} d d V W ul Vl Vf'V O q 111 N • In N O q V1 N • d d o 7k a s m m v `� S m m $ m In a � o 7 CV N N r r N M M M rn fn M rn fn N Q o o q d d d d A 4 N n [r] M N m N O m p 01 ID VL O d Ln Q m A d a n +n m N oo Q N ftp nl m m m N N N N N N r LU 7 m r rn rn m m L9ka1 rn m v i m no a, r- r Go L11 m m c r�� n `n v m m m rmv a N N N N N fV z r� z D D O V1 v1 L7 p N uR q d Lei N q 4 N V1 • Q q N I.Pr d d u1 V1 4 4 4r7 ul • q V m v v p p m rn a a o m m � 'ct a 4 m ri W 1d n n n f+ i- fl n r- GO C4 co m co co [n 07 6•V pi pi Pi m O 4 b q co Q C) q d A 4 Q A d O q d d d p d A A O 4 O Q o q 0 z V 1D r n 1n V5 m a+ d m t2 N M V K] n rY7 _N n m [-1 U+ rr 7 c0 16 r r VJ1 CJ V '�t fV N � � N W O_ N r f+l M r tin m On 10 Q rn N m nrCL 4 N b O pp po p W O R N N M1'1 PA'I 1 V V O d Vl1 N d O • N ✓1 q d N in C7 O LTl 1f1 O p r r r r m rn v a o o r M M v7� o 00 :i :i r.i ry iv r i r i ni ry ru ti m m m m m rr m ti Cl r .- r o p p d p d d d p A A A a 0 0 O d 6 q [V Cl a•. s 3 ra � •s co co m ir} 4 m Ua 4 �Y M ry V N a V V Fn N �r M1 r LO Ln lfl ry Q i11 Q (? N IA p C] Lf1 VI p 7� o o M In 4 Lnm m '- u"� OO Ln i7 C^ cn p- M m M m Fn Nt ry N m yO % til Q Q N {y N N r.l N T p ru rmrs p mry Yom- 4 m CL m w 4 0 v a o a ' v� I.n ' 0 m ' v tA t o a s o o p p a 0 o N N n LL7 � r m r� K7 4 C❑ F7 !- 4 Q N r4 N N N N ry 1 M N r r r Do lil m V �/'1 Ql t❑ N u1 QO m m c ry r z �I z O o Ln o o w v, v vIn in p U m m V !t O O P d Ci p v O fy � a Q 1A N Q1 d u7 Ln Y7 N_ ti p1 i] u+ a m ry W 06 v v .- M N lr] N OO v n v v v r, a a r N Po a d Ln Ln QM Y] In • Q O �f'1 11'f Cj 6 V1 V1 Q Q O rn m 4 q4 C? a m m e � a ra coA m n,rn a Q N N N s Ol FQ co N n p co n Q S N D N P OC ra v � r oo CO r. co ai r ¢ z a Q y Ln m v 7 77 � ❑ a O LL � ❑ N 1p N %0 N N Ln CO .n N 'Im L9rn 90 m C N oe � m O N r 0 .N-• r ' rn LL rn C to 1.❑ p ry r4 v Ln 1b Ln a o m aa 0 n o 0 �e, 4 Ln p p ❑ ❑ Q ❑ n m r V ir1 v1 LO CG � d q, Ir t N V ph n n M 0 M O Rr5 ❑ m 0 M tY N M d7 v Q cc a r G 66 o a v rFT ❑ a w 7 ^ Lu V a. W ^ a W O p N 0 dtic m m a > „Qi � � o ❑ ❑ a G i w LD2 � ❑ Q- rC p ❑ m Q 7 iu ¢ � ¢ ¢ w a u ¢ ❑ [X a wC4 y or 0. x O _p wd ❑❑ cc a T = _ _ = CL w $ Lrl F m p.NlY ❑ rj O m °� a N ri IV❑ 7 C+ ~ ❑ r� H T Q ¢ a 0. r4 E Tj a a m u F m Nr Q ❑ CT❑ a ❑ Q r¢u ry 0 I v a Y _ N F- 'IQ 3 15 cc mQ pp N fn Fd U ❑ F = La h r CO �• r �_ N m c71 N ¢ CLL a Ix y v Ln LLJ PC SI] 6 Q a q a ❑ ❑ AC r [V Z N ry Ln H n N rV I Ct rn v! .Ir LP cc C7 M PC Gs `? 6.1 z a z O m nNi o m i7 N O r'- a r`- 0 a Ln a U F Ln a v 10. a s 9 In Q o o a 0 O p ao a C3 d P Q p 4 O p ❑ R '' r m a n r. w r Ln nuj q n V d ra N N .J O ip 4 ❑ G O, n P Q, n O In 4 triLn Q N J ~ n d a N 4 O I z d O, ❑n, cc Ln O cn 4 Y W LJJ SC w ❑ Y (K N rL{7 Z A cw Q L¢u p ¢ O a 3 w a W a m Lo Qa CC cr Lm¢ m i i wd a p a � � Q q rc w °,� , z w J a w N w ` S a x S O - � r d J �2 D CC o u D M ¢ ¢ LL 3E z W ❑ w 43 uQl U" w cr cc Z a ce Q cn — a s Se Q 0. CL ❑ [1 a Y Q -z 2 ❑ 2 2 a .�, cO G t ❑ ❑ p Q �4[ ae u St se o O O •A 0 — Q ❑ r2 `2 r2 u O a .Q1i ua1 w L li 17, a = r [ u o Q Q Q Q A Q Q Q ¢ ¢ Q z p a a Q a a ry ni rm co i ❑ a' ;m7 LL 1 Qa Q z � r r r O v. N Q U) 1L7 r d1 M m O fn 00 N pq N 1 o ul ry m w Ln � n LM v in M N N N M N ru [nu en- r rqLts Ln n ? g p 4 N ran In Y Y o d 0 m In O � � p O r �� In v V oIR 60 w n n t• r rl n f, 7. A an co 03 co 00 00 id to m Q1 Cl) 0i Ch 0% T d d d p a p d 6 0 O fl q p d r7 n p a 0 p d O d fl p p p N N N m L m a u'1 N N N N ru N N N rrj N n r�,l m In fn m N 4 N to N m LA m r•'f 4 m p C7 N p •- r- .- r r � .- r r r ry N N f4 v �o r!1 Lp U3 Ln m 00 R LO d rL r 6 Q] Q v7 C] d � N Vs O p rJ'f � p C7 � u1 iJ1 p O u"f u� � d C] rn V1 p p � �n vi � d rr1 � Q p m m C a p fn M It � p p M rn 4 p .-- r r N N N N fV N N r%u M en M M m m M m C7 p p O p N n rn r� OD w m m a Ln N o d n V m Q to N cs In m d 00 In (] M N N fl'7 m ren rn N ry N N N ry } W f'+ 00 11'I NLn O LA O Q Yl p kn O 10 N b' V 10 R a Ch cn O m m 00 01 O m{ LU LU m op n'1 6+ r4 u"i N m p N p� m m f ca V M O w Qf rn z N N N C4 N N �I Z C:) d o rn in p d �n �n o o �n �n p p u� en o a I in in o o �n Ln L]{ m c v d o m m � v, d io iR J n r n 11 ri n t� n m w 03 m co m cti oo 0) ai vi Qi m C% c, Q d O 0 o p p p p d 6 O O p M a d0 0 p O C) o a p p a p .- a kD m m LO R m in m ro w r[7 n N n Oi CL N n tp m N Mm N C] .- fn rn M N qf] N n v Itm rn m v Ln r m D V, m N N ^ N C, 0 m rr'1 V gj g r/'1 sn C7 C7 �!'� .n O p v1 N p O us w p p sn N d d in N d p m rn ra v p p m n� V v O Q r m m � V o m N N N .- r- .� N fV r'm N M1I N fV N F M M M m M rr1 M m Q R N r- r .- O a d O O O D � Q p p p d b d d p d 0 d C7 O C] d O p o w M � • m Ido 6n v m rd v Lei vr1l In r� r`av n�i C ry rJ m LO m N m CD Ln N_ P 4 L1'I Ln i d d Lr1 N C1 p Ln u-1 d d M n V v 4 4 Y'rl m Y 4 Ln u1 m r n o Ln m r V1 m at 0 m m m m m rm m ry r^ N � C r1 N N ryC N N N ✓'Q m co Cr] m LM r+1 d P p d P 1D C CL O 4) No ' Ln Ln O d N &n O 6 Ln N d [] LA N O _ ¢ r.ti fn tr d 4 rr1 rrk d 7 t[ tT rr Lr1 Ll1 Ln N O 1f1 a LR C d d P C7 d P O D p p O N g r= rn r n rn M M Ltl '? M N N V (] N N N N N N N N k } W 7 rn Ln Q' r• m n %n 04 %D k rn r r o m r Q OC W m J1 N n't N v1 F<� 7 p LPI Ln d O N 111 O d V'1 Ln d d 1n 1n fl U a z Lmn Go Mp m m o mro n 1n n ti rn M L!1 M co d on m ,It N f-40 N 1klo �i1 ka r r r P 0 0 m n N m rm a 1 4 Ln u1 1 m m V o K v v V LP LPI 5!'1 LP I!1 LA N 1n p O d d d 4 p O d G wd d d 0 O N d <Z N �D M TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PV UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX B CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC i Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 'I 1� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 467 877 1 9 17 Future Vol,veh/h 12 467 877 1 9 17 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 - Grade,% - 0 0 ❑ Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 4 0 0 0 Mvmt Flaw 8 504 982 1 16 24 Major/Minor Ma ort Ma•or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 983 [i 0 1503 983 Stage 1 - 983 - 5tage 2 520 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6,4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - Critical Hdwy 5tg 2 - - 5.4 - Foilow-up Hdwy 2.2. 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 711 135 305 Stage 1 - - 366 Stage 2 - - 601 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 711 - - - 134 305 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 314 - Stage 1 - - 362 - Stage 2 - - 601 - Aperoach EB WB.. SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 18.4 FiCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvint EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 711 309 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 0.129 HCM Control Delay(s) 10.1 18.4 HCM Lane LOS 8 C HCM 95th%tile q(veh) 0 0-4 The Traffic Management Consultant Page B-1 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5:Ishihara Farm Rd Earl's Dwy& Mamilahoa-Hwy Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic intersection Int 1)0I 1y,s/Veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations '+ *1y Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 456 0 1 861 6 1 0 2 2 0 15 Future Vol,veh/h 13 456 0 1 861 6 1 0 2 2 0 15 Conflicting Peds,f#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop stop stop RT Channelized - None - None - - None - None Storage Length Q _ Veh in Median Storage,#f- 0 0 2 _ _ 0 Grade,% 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 4 33 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 12 492 ❑ 1 956 8 1 0 1 1 0 12 Major/Minor ma•orl. Ma'ar2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 961 0 0 497 0 0 1484 1482 492 1479 1478 960 Stage 1 - - - - - 516 516 962 962 - 5tage 2 - 968 966 517 516 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4A 7,1 6.5 6.2 7,1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdvvy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 5.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 722 - 1082 104 126 581 105 127 305 Stage 1 - - 546 538 310 337 - Stage 2 - - - 308 336 545 538 - Platoon blacked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 722 - 1082 98 124 581 103 125 305 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 249 280 - 103 125 - Stage 1 - - 537 529 - 305 336 Stage 2 295 335 535 529 Approach EB WB NB s$ HCM Control Delay,s 0,2 0 15.4 19,3 NCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Ma ar Mvmt N8Ln1 EBL EBT EBR W13L WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(ve{i/F} 349 722 1082 - 265 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.406 0.017 0.001 0-049 HCM Control Delay(s) 15-4 10.1 8.3 0 - 19.3 HCM Lane LOS C B A A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0 0,2 The Traffic Management Consultant page B-2 r � Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC & Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL. EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations f T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 27 411 930 5 16 66 Future Vol,veh/h 27 411 930 5 16 66 Conflicting Peds,#/hr ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- ❑ 0 2 - Grade,% - 0 ❑ 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 0 0 8 Mvmt Flaw 32 456 967 8 20 44 Maar/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 975 f] 0 1491 971 Stage 1 - - 971 - Stage 2 520 - Critical Hdwy x}.14 6.4 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 3.5 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 699 - 138 299 Stage 1 - - 370 - Stage 2 - - 601 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 699 132 299 Mav Cap-2 Maneuver - 308 - Stage 1 353 Stage 2 601 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0 20.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt ESI. EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 699 302 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-046 0.213 HCM Control Delay(s) 10.4 20.1 HCM Lane LOS B C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.8 The Traffic Management Consultant Page B-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI Existin&PM Peak Hour Traffic InterseAlb.n All. lilt Delay,s/veh 0.2 Mg 8T• WBT WBR SBL SBR Lana Configurations t 1� Y _ Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1009 567 3 2 9 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1009 567 3 2 9 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 - ❑ Veh in Median Storage,#3- 0 ❑ 2 Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 10o Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 2 ❑ 0 ❑ Mvmt Flow 17 969 680 8 1 8 Major/Minor Ma'or1 major 2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 688 0 0 1687 684 Stage 1 - - - 684 Stage 2 - 1003 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy 5tg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3,5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 916 - 104 452 Stage 1 - 505 - Stage 2 - - 358 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 916 102 452 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 290 - Stage 1 - - 495 Stage 2 358 A roach EB WB 58 _ HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 13.6 I ICM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt EBL EBT- WBT WBR SBLnl Capacity(veh/h) 916 426 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.019 0.021 HCM Control Delay{s} 9 13.6 HCM Lane LOS A g HCM 95th%tile q(veh) 0.1 0-1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page B-4 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5: Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's❑wy&Mamalahoa Hwy Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N8L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '4 4 +14 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 11 999 2 0 559 2 1 0 1 2 0 10 Future Vol,veh/h 11 999 2 0 559 2 1 0 1 2 0 10 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - None None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage,#;- 0 ❑ - 2 - 0 Grade,% - 0 i7 U 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ Mvmt Flow 8 949 4 0 682 1 1 ❑ 1 4 0 5 Major/Minor Ma'orl Ma ort Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow Ail 683 0 0 953 0 0 1652 1650 951 1651 1652 683 Stage 1 - - - - - - 967 967 - 683 683 - Stage 2 - - 685 683 - 968 969 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow•up Hdwy 2..2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3-3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 919 729 79 100 318 80 100 453 Stage 1 - 308 335 - 442 452 - Stage 2 - - - - 441 452 - 308 334 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 919 - 729 78 99 318 79 99 453 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 246 268 79 99 - Stage 1 - - - 305 332 438 452 Stage 2 - - 436 452 304 331 A roach EB WB NB 513 HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 18.1 31.3 NCM LOS C ❑ Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 5BLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 277 919 729 146 NCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 0.009 0.062 HCM Control Delay(s) 18.1 9 0 - 31.3 HCM Lane LOS C A A ❑ HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0 0 - 0.2 The Traffic Management Consultant Page B-5 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Intersection lit Delay,s/veh 0.8 Movenld l• t EBL WBT WBR SBL_ SBR Lane Configurations f '4 Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 40 996 516 IS 35 64 Future Vol,veh/h 40 996 516 15 35 64 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 Gfdde, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles. % 0 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flow 40 966 593 32 18 48 Ma•or/Minor Ma'orl Wjor2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow Al[ 625 0 0 1655 609 Stage 1 - - - 609 - Stage 2 - 1046 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.49 6.22 Critical Hdwy Sig 1 - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy 5tg 2 - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 966 104 495 Stage 1 - 530 - Stage 2 - - 328 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 966 - - 100 495 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 275 - Stage 1 - 508 - Stage 2 328 Approach EB Wa 5B NCM Control Delay,s 0.4 ❑ 15.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBI WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/F) 966 408 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.161 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.9 HCM Lane L05 A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.6 The Traffic Management Consultant Page B-6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PU' UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX C CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2025 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mamalahoa-Hwy&Waikeiehua PI 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL }t ' Lane Configurations ' 14 Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 523 1124 1 10 19 Future Vol,vehjh 13 523 1124 1 10 19 Conflicting Peds,#/hr ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage.#- 0 0 2 Grade,A - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 4 4 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 565 1259 1 18 27 Major/Minor Ma'orl Ma ort MiOClti , Conflicting Flow All 1260 0 0 1843 1260 Stage 1 - - - - 1260 - Stage 2 - - 583 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 559 - 84 210 Stage 1 - 270 - Stage 2 - 562 - Platoon blocked, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 559 - 83 210 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 236 Stage 1 - 266 - Stage 2 - 562 Approach E8 WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 25-5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 559 220 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-016 0.203 HCM Control Delay(s) 11.5 25.5 HCM Lane Las B D HCM 95th Statile q(veh) 0 Q.7 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C-1 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5:Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 i Lane Configurations 14 Traffic Vol,vehfh 1S 519 0 1 1108 7 1 0 2 2 0 17 Future Vol,veh/h 15 519 0 1 1108 7 1 0 2 2 ❑ 17 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - None - - None Storage Length 50 - - Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 - 0 2 - 0 Grade,% - 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 0 0 4 33 0 0 0 0 ❑ 7 Mvmt Flow 14 561 0 1 1230 9 1 0 1 1 0 14 NRQO~ Major1 fU( dr? MlriorI. NOW2 Conflicting Flow All 1239 0 0 561 0 ❑ 1833 1830 561 1827 1826 1235 Stage 1 - - - - - - 589 589 - 1237 1237 - Stage 2 - - 1244 1241 - 590 589 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.7. 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 569 - - 1020 - 59 77 531 60 78 210 Stage 1 - - 498 499 - 217 250 - Stage 2 - - - - - 215 249 - 497 499 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 569 - - 1420 - - 54 75 531 59 76 210 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 168 207 - 59 76 - Stage 1 - - - - - 486 487 212 249 - Stage 2 - - 200 248 484 487 - A0000—ach EB. :. 118 HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 19.2 26.9 HCM LOS C 0 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt 1119Lrt1 EX :EBT ESR WSL. .I1 B T ;WOKS801 Capacity(veh/h) 255 569 - _ 1020 - - 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 0.024 - - 0.001 - 0.082 HCM Control Delay(s) 19,2 11,5 - 8.5 0 - 26.9 HCM Lane Los C B - A A D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 - 0 - 0.3 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C-2 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI 2025 AM Peak flour Traffic Without Pro•ect Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SB9 — - -LaneConfigurationsConfigurations ] t T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 30 493 1042 6 18 74 Future Vol,veh/h 30 493 1042 6 18 74 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 - Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 ❑ 0 8 Mvmt Flow 36 547 1084 10 23 50 Major/Minor Ma•or1 Ma'or2 Minor2 - Conflicting flow All 1094 f) 0 1708 1089 Stage 1 - - - 1089 - Stage 2 - 619 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.4 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2-236 - 3.5 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 630 - - 101 255 Stage 1 - 326 - Stage 2 - - 541 - Piatoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 630 - - 95 255 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 265 - Stage 1 - - 307 Stage 2 541 Approach EB WB SB _ HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0 24-3 IICM LOS {: Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 630 258 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0-279 HCM Control Delay(s) 11.1 24.:3 HCM Lane LOS B C HCM 95th°Mile q(veh) 0.2 1-1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mama lahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project_ Intersection Int Delay, s/veh O1 2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SSL SBR Lane Configurations �j t T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 1169 656 3 2 9 Future Vol,veh/h 13 1169 656 3 2 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 - Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 1[70 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 2 ❑ 0 0 Mvmt Flow 19 1122 787 8 1 8 Major/Minor Ma'orl Ma'or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 795 0 0 1951 791 Stage 1 - - - 791 - Stage 2 - 1160 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 835 72 393 Stage 1 - 450 - 5tage 2 - - 301 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 835 - - 70 393 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 243 - Stage 1 - - 440 - Stage 2 301 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 l5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvwt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 835 368 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.024 HCM Control Delay tsy 94 15 HCM Lane LOS A C: HCM 95th%tile Q{veh} 0.1 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C-4 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th'IWSC 5; Ishihara Farm Rd/Ea rl's Dwy&Ma malahoa H wy 2025 PM Peak Flour Traffic Without Project Intersection Int Dvlay,s/voh 0.4 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations 1� +14 4 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 11S7 2 0 648 2. 1 0 1 2 0 11 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1157 2 0 648 2 1 0 1 2 0 11 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop stop RT Channeli2ed - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 - 2 0 _ Grade,% - 0 t] 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 25 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Whicles,% 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flaw 35 1099 4 0 791 1 1 0 1 4 0 6 Major/Minor Ma•or1 Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 792 0 0 1103 0 0 1966 1963 1101 1964 1965 792 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1171 1171 - 792 792 - 5tage 2 - - 795 792 - 1172 1173 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow•up Hdwy 2-2 2-2 3-5 4 3.3 3.S 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 838 - - 640 48 64 250 48 64 392 Stage 1 - - 237 269 - 385 404 - Stage 2 - - 384 404 - 237 268 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 838 640 - 46 61 260 46 61 392 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 183 208 - 46 61 - Stage 1 - - - 227 258 - 369 404 Stage 2 379 404 226 257 Approach_ EB WB NB 56 HCM Control Delay,s 0-3 0 21.9 47-6 . HCM LCIS C E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 _ Capacity(veh/h) 215 838 640 94 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.042 0.101 HCM Control Delay(s) 21.9 9.5 0 47.6 HCM Lane LCIS C A A L HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0 0.3 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C-5 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahea Hwy&Keaka Kea PI 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Int Int Delay,s/veh 0.9 Moyemet EBL .jT Lane Configurations + Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 1116 578 17 39 72 Future Vol,veh/h 45 1116 578 17 39 72 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - ❑ Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 - Grade,% - a U 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flow 45 1083 665 36 20 54 Major/Minor Ma'orl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 701 0 0 1856 683 Stage 1 - - - - 683 - Stage 2 - - 1173 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.49 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 905 - - - 78 449 Stage 1 - 489 - Stage 2 - - - - 285 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 905 - - - 74 449 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 239 - Stage 1 - - - - 465 - Stage 2 - - 285 Approach EB WB S8 HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 17-4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity(veh/h) 905 364 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 0.202 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.2 - 17.4 HCM Lane LOS A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 0.7 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C-6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PV UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX D CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2025 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT Puukapu Piace Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project ti^i�seL�Ljon - Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations r ' Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 538 1138 1 10 19 Future Vol,veh/h 13 538 1138 1 10 19 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 - 2 Grade,% 4 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehictes,% ❑ 4 4 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 581 1275 1 18 27 Major/Mirror: Majorl h4MaQ - Conflicting Flow All 1276 0 ❑ 1875 1276 Stage 1 - - - - 1276 - Stage 2 - - 599 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 551 - - - 80 206 Stage 1 - - 265 - Stage 2 - - - - 553 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 551 - - 79 206 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 231 - Stage 1 - - 261 - Stage 2 553 - HCM Control Delay.s 0.2 0 26.1 HCM LCIS 0 to nnr.Lane/Major Mvmt EEO- Ear WOT-.WBRIBL'i Capacity[veh/h) 551 - - - 215 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 0.207 HCM Control Delay{s} 11.6 - - - 26.1 HCM Lane LOS 8 D HCM 95th%tile Qjveh) 0 - - - 0.8 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-1 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 2:West Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Int Delay,s/veh ❑ EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations f Y Traffic Vii,veh/h 541 7 1 1136 4 0 Future Vol,veh/h 541 7 1 1136 4 0 Conflicting Peds,#t/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,W _ - 0 2 Grade,% 0 0 ❑ - PeakHourFactor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 584 7 1 1272 4 0, Ma-or/Minor Ma'orl Ma ort Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 591 0 1862 588 Stage 1 - - - - 588 - 5tage 2 - 1274 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5-4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 995 81 S13 Stage 1 - 559 Stage 2 - - - - 265 Platoon blocked,I Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 995 81 513 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 235 Stage 1 - - - - 559 Stage 2 - 265 Approach EB W8 _ N3 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 20.6 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 235 995 HCM Lane V/C Patin 0.017 0-001 HCM Control Delay(s) 20.6 8.6 HCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page 0-2 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 4:Center Dwy&Marnalahoa Hwy 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veh, 0 066'iWe'nt Ek `1 R'WRI WsT 14Bf, - - - Lane Configura"ions 1 1 Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 536 5 2 1134 3 1 Future Vol,veh/h 536 5 2 1134 3 1 Conflicting Peds,#f/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - Dane - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,40 - 0 2 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 579 5 2 1270 3 1 Major/Minor Ma•orl Ma'or2 Minor' - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 584 0 1856 582 Stage 1 - - - - 582 - Stage 2 - 1274 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy S-g 1 - - 5-4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - Follow-up Iidwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-I Maneuver 1001 82 517 Stage 1 563 - Stage 2 - - 265 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 1001 82 517 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 234 Stage 1 - - 563 Stage 2 - - 264 Appfoach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 4 0 18.5 HCM LCIS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 271 1001 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.015 0-002 HCM Control Delay(s) 18-5 8.6 HCM Lane LDS C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0 - The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TW5C 5:Ishihara Farm Rd Earl's Dwy&Ma_malaboa Hwy _ 2025 AM Peale Baur Traffic With€'roiect Intersection Int Meloy,-;/vch 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ 1F Traffic Vol,veh/h 15 520 3 1 1111 7 8 0 3 2 0 17 Future Vol,vehjh 15 520 3 1 1111 7 8 0 3 2 0 17 Conflicting Peds,#Jhr 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None None Storage Length 50 - - 50 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 - - ❑ 2 - 2 Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 0 0 4 33 0 0 (i 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 14 562 3 1 1233 9 8 0 2 1 0 14 M M nor Ma'or1 Ma•or2 Minorl M ort Conflicting Flow All 1242 0 0 565 0 0 1839 1836 564 1833 1833 1238 Stage 1 - - - - - - 592 592 - 1240 1240 - Stage 2 - - 1247 1244 - 593 593 Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - 7,1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 568 - 1017 - 59 77 529 59 77 209 Stage 1 - 496 497 217 249 - 5tage 2 - - - - 215 248 496 497 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 568 - - 1017 54 75 529 58 75 209 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 169 207 188 218 - 5tage 1 - - - 484 485 212 249 Stage 2 201 248 482 485 Approach EB WB N8 SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 25.1 23.7 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Majar Myrnt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL W8T WBR SBLn1 _ Capacity(veh/h) 189 568 1017 207 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 0.024 0-001 - 0.071 HCM Control Delay(s) 25.1 11.5 8.5 23.7 HCM Lane LOS D B A C HCM 95th%tile Q(vehy 0.2 0.1 0 0.2 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-4 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6: Mama lahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI 2025 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int L'rrlay,s/veh 1.2 - - - - - -- - Movemer� � EBL EBT WBT WBR SK- 9B'R Lane Configuralions t Ik Y Traffic Vol,vehj'h 30 495 1045 6 18 74 Future Vol,veh/h 30 495 1045 6 is 74 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized . None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 0 0 8 Mvmt Flow 36 549 1087 10 23 50 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 _ Conflicting Flow All 1097 0 0 1713 1092 Stage 1 - - - 1092 - 5tage 2 - - 621 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 6.4 6.28 Critical F{dwy 5tg 1 - 5-4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 - - 3,5 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 629 - 101 254 Stage 1 - 324 - Stage 2 - - 540 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 629 95 254 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 264 - Stage 1 - 306 - Stage 2 540 - Approach EB WS SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0 24.4 HCM LCIS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 629 257 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 0.28 HCM Control Deiay(s) 11.1 - 24.4 HCM Lane LOS B C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-5 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Int Delay,s/veh 0-2 M T WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t T* Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 1190 679 3 2 9 Future Vol,veh/h 13 1190 679 3 2 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 165 - ❑ Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 - 2 - Grade,% 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 2 ❑ 0 ❑ Mvmt Flow 19 1142 815 8 1 8 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Major2 Minor2 - Conflicting Flow All 823 4 0 1999 819 Stage 1 - - - - 819 - Stage 2 - 1180 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 816 - - - 67 379 Stage 1 - - - 437 - Stage 2 - - - - 295 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 816 - - - 65 379 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 237 Stage 1 - - - - 427 - Stage 2 295 - Appaacb EB WB 58 .a HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 15.4 HCM LDS C Minor Larre Maar MVrnt EBL EBT -WAT W139 5814A• Capacity(veh/h) 816 - - - 355 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 0.025 HCM Control Delay{s} 9.5 - - - 15.4 HCM Lane LCIS A - - C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-6 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 2:West Dwy&_Mamalahoa Hwy 2025_PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection - Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 Movement CBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1 f Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 1175 17 6 668 15 10 Future Vol,veh/h 1175 17 6 668 15 10 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#0 - - 0 2 - Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,`Yo 3 0 0 2 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1269 17 6 748 15 10 Major/Minor_ _Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1286 0 2038 1278 Stage 1 - - - - 1278 - Stage 2 - - 760 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 7 - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 546 - 63 205 Stage 1 - 264 - 5tage 2 - - 465 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 546 62 205 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 223 - Stage 1 - - - 264 Stage 2 460 A Gh ES WB N8 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 23.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Ma or Mvmt NBLnI EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 215 546 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.116 1011 HCM Control Delay(s) 23.9 11.7 HCM Lane LOS C B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-7 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 5th TWSC 4:Center Dwy&Marna lahoo Hwy 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/w,h 0.3 Movers'eint EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations TO T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 1171 14 5 661 13 9 Future Vol,veh/h 1171 14 5 661 13 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Done - None Storage Length 50 - ❑ Veh in Median Storage,#0 - - 0 2 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 3 0 0 2 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1265 14 5 740 13 9 Major/Minor Ma ort Ma OT2 Minor! Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1279 0 2022 1272 Stage 1 - - - - 1272 - Stage 2 - 750 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 33 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 550 - 65 207 Stage 1 - 2156 - Stage 2 - - - 470 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 550 - 64 207 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 225 - Stage 1 - - 256 - Stage 2 - 466 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 23.5 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBt WBT Capacity(veh/h) 217 - - 550 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 - - 0.009 HCM Control Delay(s) 23.5 - - 11.6 - HCM Lane LOS C B HCM 95th°tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - ❑ - The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-8 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5:Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Int Delay,s/veh 0.2 E8L EST EBR WBL WBT WBR. NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 12 1160 8 1 650 2 5 0 1 2 0 11 Future Vol,veh/h 12 1160 8 1 650 2 5 0 1 2 0 11 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length 50 - 50 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 2 Grade,% - 0 i} 0 - ❑ Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 1102 16 1 793 1 5 0 1 4 0 6 Major/Minor Majorl Major--2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 794 0 0 1118 0 0 1927 1924 111C 1925 1932 794 Stage 1 - - - - - 1128 1128 796 796 - Stage 2 - - 799 796 1129 1136 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 7,1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2..2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3-5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 836 632 - 51 68 257 51 67 391 Stage 1 - 250 282 383 402 - Stage 2 - - - - 382 402 - 250 279 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 836 632 50 67 257 50 66 391 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 198 224 199 223 - Stage 1 - - - 247 279 379 401 Stage 2 376 401 - 246 276 - Approach EB WB NB _.sa. HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 ❑ 23 18.4 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR SBI-n1 Capacity(vah/h) 206 836 632 278 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0,029 0.01 0.002 0.034 HCM Control Delay(s) 23 9.4 - 10.7 18.4 NCM Lane LCIS C A B C HCM 95th%tile R(veh) 0-1 0 0 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-9 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI 2025 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersectio Int Delay,s/veh 0-9 Move 6L EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lame Configurations ] Traffic Vol,veh/h 45 1119 581 17 39 72 Future Vol,veh/h 45 1119 581 17 39 72. Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,!t- 0 0 2 Grade,% - ❑ 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flaw 45 1085 668 36 20 54 Major/Miner• Ma'orl Ma 6r2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 704 0 0 1861 686 Stage 1 - - - 686 - 5tage 2 - 1175 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.49 6.22 Critical Hdwy 5tg 1 - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 903 - 77 447 Stage 1 - 487 - Stage 2 - - - 284 - Platoon Mocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 903 - - 73 447 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 238 Stage 1 - - 463 - Stage 2 284 Approach- EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 17.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR 5BLn1 Capacity(veh/h903 363 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 0-2077 HCM Control Delay{s} 9.2 17-4 HCM Lane L05 A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.7 The Traffic Management Consultant Page D-10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PU` UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX E CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2030 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT Puukapu Place Rezoning NCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection int Delay,s/ve.h 0-8 Mo4r60'Pst EBL EBT' WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t 1� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 15 570 1225 1 11 21 Future Vol,veh/h 15 570 1225 1 11 21 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized . None - None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,f#- 0 0 2 Grade,% 0 b 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% ❑ 4 4 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 616 1372 1 20 30 Major/minor Majorl Majora Minora - Conflicting Flow All 1373 0 0 2009 1373 Stage 1 - - - 1373 - Stage 2 636 - Critical Hdwy 4.1. 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 506 - 66 180 Stage 1 - 238 Stage 2 - - 531 - Platoon blocked,% MovCap-1 Maneuver 506 65 180 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 207 - Stage 1 - - 233 - Stage 2 531 - Approach - _ER_ - WS _513 --- - —HCM Control Control Delay,s 0.2 0 30.4 HCM LOS 1.7 Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WB1 WBR SBLnl Capacity(veh/h) 506 190 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-02 0.259 HCM Control Delay(s) 12.3 30.4 HCM Lane LDS B D HCM 95th 0/.tile Q(veh) 0.1 1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page E-1 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5:Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's_D-wy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Int Delay,s/veh 0-4 Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� 4� +1y Traffic Vol,veh/h 16 565 ❑ 1 1207 7 1 0 2 2 0 18 Future Vol,veh/h 16 565 0 1 1207 7 1 0 2 2 0 18 Conflicting Peds,0/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control tree Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None None - None Storage Length 50 - - Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 ❑ 2 - - 0 - Grade,% 0 0 0 0 - PeakHourFactor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 5 0 0 4 33 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 15 610 Q 1 1340 9 1 0 1 1 ❑ 14 Major/Minor Majorl Mafor2 _Minorl _ Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1349 0 0 610 0 0 1994 1991 610 1988 1987 1345 Stage 1 - - - - - - 640 640 - 1347 1347 - Stage 2 - - 1354 1351 . 641 640 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5-5 &1 5.5 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2-2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 517 979 46 61 498 46 62 181 Stage I - - 467 473 - 188 222 - Stage 2 - 187 221 - 466 473 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 517 979 41 59 498 45 60 181 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 142 182 - 45 60 Stage 1 - - - 453 459 - 283 221 Stage 2 - 171 220 - 452 459 Approach EB WB Na 5$ HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 21.4 31.5 NCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl EBL EBT EBR WHL WBT WBR SBLn1 _ Capacity(veh/h) 221 517 979 151 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0-028 0.001 0-102 HCM Control Delay(s) 21.4 12.2 8.7 0 31.5 HCM Lane LOS C B A A D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 0 0.3 The Traffic Management Consultant Page E-2 Puukapu Piace Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea P? 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersectio Irl Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movernerit EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Ccnfigura-ions t To Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 33 537 1135 6 20 81 Future Vol,veh/h 33 537 1135 6 20 81 Conflicting Peds,9/hr ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 I Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,!i- 0 0 2 Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 700 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 0 0 8 Mvmt Flow 39 596 1180 10 25 54 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minar2 Conflicting Flow All 1190 0 0 1859 1185 Stage 1 - - - - 1185 - 5tage 2 - 614 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 6.4 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 3.5 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 580 - 82 224 Stage 1 - 293 - 5tage 2 - - - 510 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 580 - 77 224 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 235 - 5tage 1 - - 273 - 5tage 2 510 - Approach 1=6 WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0 29 f ICM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBI WBT WBR 5BLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 580 228 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.348 HCM Control Delay(s) 11.7 29 HCM Lane LOS B D NCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 1.5 The Traffic Management Consultant Page E-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa Hwy&Wai_kelehua PI ,_. 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection flit Dclay, S/Veh 0.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t Ti Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 15 1274 715 4 2 10 Future Vol,veh/h 15 1274 715 4 2 10 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 Grade,% - 0 0 U Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 22 1223 858 11 1 9 Ma•or/Minor Ma'or1 Ma•or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 869 0 0 2131 864 Stage 1 - - 864 - Stage 2 - 1267 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3-5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 784 - 55 357 Stage 1 - 416 - Stage 2 - 267 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 784 - 53 357 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 215 - Stage 1 - - 404 - Stage 2 267 Approach EB WB 5B _ HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 16.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Ma•or Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 784 33S HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0.03 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.7 16.1 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page E-4 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5:Ishihara Farm Rd Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection_ f� Int Del:y, sweh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR _ Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol,veh/h 13 1260 2 0 706 2 1 0 1 2 0 12 Future Vol,veh/h 13 1260 2 0 706 2 1 0 1 2 ❑ 12 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - None Storage Length 50 - Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 - - 0 2 0 Grade,% - ❑ - ❑ 0 ❑ Peak Hour Factor 25 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 2 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 38 1197 4 0 861 1 1 0 1 4 0 6 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Mlnorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 862 0 0 1201 0 0 2140 2137 1199 2138 2139 862 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1275 1275 - 862 862 - Stage 2 - - 865 862 1276 1277 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.S 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 789 - - 588 36 50 228 36 50 358 Stage 1 - - 207 240 - 353 375 - Stage 2 - - - - 351 375 - 207 239 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 789 - - 588 - 34 48 228 35 48 358 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 159 183 - 35 48 - Stage 1 - - - - - 197 228 336 375 Stage 2 - - 345 375 196 228 Approach EB WB NB SB } HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 24.5 59.4 HCM LOS C F Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt NBLnl EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR S3Ln1 _ Capacity(veh/h) 187 789 - 588 - 76 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-011 0.048 - - - 0.132 HCM Control Delay(s) 24.5 9.8 - - 0 - - 59.4 HCM Lane LDS C A - - A - - F HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 - - ❑ - - 0.4 The Traffic Management Consultant Page E-5 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection Int delay,s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBi WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 1215 630 18 43 78 Future Vol,veh/h 49 1215 630 18 43 78 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 - - ❑ Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flow 49 1179 725 38 22 59 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flaw All 763 0 0 2021 744 Stage 1 - - - - 744 - Stage 2 - - - 1277 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.49 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 859 - - - 61 415 Stage 1 - - 457 - Stage 2 - - - 253 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 859 - - 58 415 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 212 - Stage 1 - - - 431 - Stage 2 - 253 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 19.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR 5BLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 859 - - 330 HCM Lane V/C Ratio ❑.057 0.242 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.4 19.4 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) ❑.2 0.9 The Traffic Management Consultant Page E-6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PW UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX F CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2030 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Belay,s/veh 0.8 Movomeni'--. EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SIBR Lane Configurations t 1� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 1S 585 1239 1 11 21 Future Vol,veh/h 15 585 1239 1 11 21 Conflicting Peds,#/hr ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Medlan Storage,#- 0 0 2 Grade,°I - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% C 4 4 0 0 0 MVmt Flow 10 632 1388 1 20 30 Major/Minor Maori Mabr2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1389 0 0 2041 1389 Stage 1 - 1389 - Stage 2 - - 652 Critical Hdwy 4,1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-i Maneuver 499 - 63 176 Stage 1 - 233 - Stage 2 - - 522 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 499 62 176 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 203 - Stage 1 - 228 - Stage 2 - 522 Approach EB WB SS _ HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 31.2 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvrnt EBL EST WBT WBR SBLnl Capacity(veh/h) 499 186 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-02 0.264 HCM Control Delay(s) 12,4 31.2 HCM Lane LOS B D HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0,1 1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-1 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 2:West Dwy& Mamalahoa Hwy _ 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay, s/veh U Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NSR. Lane Configurations T) t Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 589 7 1 1236 4 ❑ Future Vol,veh•f h 589 7 1 1236 4 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#0 - 0 2 - Grade,% 0 ❑ 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 636 7 1 1384 4 0 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'0r2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 643 ❑ 2❑26 640 Stage 1 - - - - 640 - Stage 2 - 1386 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 951 - 64 479 Stage 1 - - 529 - Stage 2 - - - 234 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 951 - 64 479 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 208 Stage 1 - - - 529 Stage 2 234 Approach EB WB N8 HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 22.6 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Ma'or Mvmt NBLnI EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 208 951 HCM Lane VYC Ratio 0.019 0.001 HCM Control Delay(s) 22.6 8.8 NCM Lane LOS C A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-2 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 4:Center Dwy&Mamalahoa Hn 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intotsectf6d'. Aim Int Delay,s/veh ❑ - Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 584 5 2 1234 3 1 Future Vol,veh/h 584 5 2 1234 3 1 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#t0 - - 0 2 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 631 5 2 1382 3 1 M*r;M:bbr Ma•or.1 Alla"irI.. WWII Conflicting Flow All ❑ 0 636 0 2020 634 Stage 1 - - - - 634 - Stage 2 - 1386 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 957 - 65 483 Stage 1 - - 532 - Stage 2 - - 234 - Platoon blocked,% - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 957 65 483 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 208 - 5tage 1 - - - 532 - Stage 2 - - 234 - $': HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 20.1 HCM LOS C Mirror j2iri�jMtjor°Mvmt I►t83a•1 ENT -EAR WEL -WBT _ Capacity(vehffiy 243 - - 957 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - - 0.002 - HCM Control delay(s) 20.1 - - 8.8 - HCM Lane LOS C - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5: Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's Dwy& MamaIahoa Hwy 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection _ Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WI3T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ 14 Traffic Vol,veh/h 16 566 3 1 1210 7 8 ❑ 3 2 0 18 Future Vol,veh/h 16 566 3 1 1210 7 8 0 3 2 0 18 Conflicting Peds,t#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channeli2ed - - None - - None None None Storage Length s0 - 50 - Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 - 0 - 2 2 - Grude,% - 0 - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 0 ❑ 4 33 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 15 611 3 1 1343 9 8 0 2 1 ❑ 14 Major/Minor Maori. Ma•or2 Miriorl Min❑r2 Conflicting Flow All 1352 0 0 614 0 0 2000 1997 613 1994 1994 1348 Stage 1 - - - - - 643 643 - 1350 1350 Stage 2 - - 1357 1354 - 644 644 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4,1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7,1 6.S 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6-1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.21- 3.5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 516 - 975 - 45 61 496 46 61 180 Stage - - 465 472 188 221 - Stage 2 - - - - 186 220 465 471 - Platoon blacked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 516 - 975 - 40 59 496 45 59 180 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 142 182 - 163 193 - Stage 1 - - - 452 458 - 183 221 Stage - - 171 220 450 457 Approach EB WB NB _ SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 ❑ 28.9 27 HCM LOS D ❑ Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl Capacity(veh/h) 160 516 975 - 179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.059 0,029 0.001 0.086 NCM Control Delay(s) 28.9 12.2 - 8.7 27 HCM Lane LOS D B A C. HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0,2 0.1 0 0.3 The Traffic Management Consuitant Page f Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa flwy& Keaka Kea PI _ 2030 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int ❑vI;iy, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WB_R SBL SBR Lane Configurations f '� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 33 539 1138 6 20 81 Future Vol,veh/h 33 539 1138 6 20 81 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 ❑ 0 0 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 0 - Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 - 2 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 0 0 8 Mvmt Flow 39 598 1184 10 25 54 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Arta-ort Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1194 0 0 1865 1189 Stage 1 - - - - 1.189 - 5tage 2 - - 676 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - - 6.4 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 - - 3.5 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 578 - - - 81 222 Stage 1 - - - 292 - Stage 2 - - - 509 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 578 - 76 222 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 235 - Stage 1 - - 272 - Stage 2 509 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.7 0 29.3 HCM LDS ❑ Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity(veh/h) 578 - 226 HCM lane V/C Ratio 0.068 - 0.351 HCM Control Delay(s) 11.7 - 29.3 HCM Lane LCIS 8 - 0 HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 1.5 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-5 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa I lwy&Walkelehua PI 2030 PM Peak Flour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Dolay, ,/veh 0-2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t T+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 15 1295 738 4 2 10 Future Vol,veh/h 15 1295 738 4 2 10 Conflicting Peds,#�hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ None None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#1- 0 0 2 - Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% ❑ 3 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 22 1243 886 11 1 9 Major/Minor w Majorl Major2 _M.inor.2 Conflicting Flow All 897 ❑ 0 2179 892 Stage 1 - - - 892 - Stage 2 - 1287 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6,2 Critical Hdwy SIg 1 - 5.4 - Criticai Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 765 51 344 Stage 1 - 404 - Stage 2 - - - 262 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 765 - - 50 344 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 210 - Stage 1 - 392 Stage 2 262 Approach Es WB 4 SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 16.5 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 765 323 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 0-031 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.8 16.5 HCM Lane LOS A C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-6 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 2:West Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Protect intersection int Delay,&/veli 0.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane ConfigurationsT4 t Traffic Vol,veh/h 1280 17 6 727 15 10 Future Vol,veh/h 1280 17 6 727 15 10 Conflicting Peds,#Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#0 - - 0 2 Grade,% 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 3 0 0 2 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1382 17 6 814 15 10 Major/Minor M*rl Ma•or2 Nlinorl. Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1399 0 2217 1391 Stage 1 - - 1391 - Stage 2 - 826 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical kidwy S[g 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy S_g 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3-5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 495 - 49 176 Stage 1 - 233 - Stage 2 - - 433 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 495 48 176 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 197 - Stage 1 - _ - 233 Stage 2 428 Approach EB WB N B HCM Control Delay,s ❑ 0.1 27,1 I iCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(vehfh) 188 495 HCM Lane V/C natio 0.133 0.012 HCM Control Delay(s) 27.1 - 12.4 HCM Lane LOS ❑ B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) US - 0 - The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-7 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 4:Center Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2030 PM-Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veli 0.3 Movement• EST EBR WAL WBT NBL NBIi -- '— Lane Configurations 11 *j T Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 1276 14 5 72G 13 9 Future Vol,veh/h 1276 14 5 720 13 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length SO 0 Veh in Median Storage,40 0 2 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 140 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 0 0 2 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1378 14 5 806 13 9 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Ma ort Ninorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1392 0 2201 1385 Stage 1 - - - - 1385 - 5tage 2 - - - 816 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy 5tg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Ca p-1 Maneuver 498 50 177 Stage 1 - 234 - Stage 2 - - 438 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 498 50 177 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 199 - Stage 1 - - 234 Stage 2 - 434 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 26.5 HCM LDS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 189 - 498 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.116 0.01 HCM Control Delay(s) 26.5 12.3 HCM Lane LOS D 13 HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-8 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5; Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR 5BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ '� +1� 4 Traffic Vol,vehJh 13 1263 8 1 748 2 5 0 1 2 0 12 Future Vol,veh/h 13 1263 8 1 708 2 5 0 1 2 0 12 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None None - None Storage Length 50 50 Veh in Median Storage,4- ❑ - 0 - 2 2 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 10C 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 9 1200 16 1 864 1 5 0 1 4 0 6 Major/Minor Ma-Qrl Ma-or2 M.inorl MinQr2 ConfIictirig Flow All 865 0 0 1216 0 0 2096 2093 1208 2094 2101 865 Stage 1 - - - 1226 1226 - 867 867 - Stage 2 - - 870 867 - 1227 1234 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6,2 7.1 6.5 6-2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3,5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 787 - 581 - 39 53 225 39 52 356 Stage I - 221 253 - 350 373 Stage 2 - - - 349 373 - 220 251 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 787 - 581 - - 38 52 225 38 51 356 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 175 200 - 175 199 Stage 1 - - 219 250 346 372 Stage 343 372 217 74R Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 25.5 19.9 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl _EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity(veh/h) 182 787 581 252 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 0-012 0.002 0.04 NCM Control Delay(s) 25.5 9.6 11.2 19.9 NCM Lane LOS D A B C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0,1 0 0 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-9 ■ Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:_Mamalahca Hwy& Keaka Kea PI 2030 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project rsection Int Delay,s/veh 1 BL FBI WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations + '4 Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 49 1218 633 18 43 78 Future Vol,veh/h 49 1218 633 18 43 78 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- ❑ 0 - 2 Grade,% - 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% ❑ 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flow 49 1181 728 38 22 59 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Minvr2 Conflicting Flow All 766 0 0 2026 747 Stage 1 - - - - 747 - Stage 2 - 1279 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.49 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy 5tg 2 - - - - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 856 - - - 61 413 Stage 1 - - 456 - Stage 2 - - - - 253 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 856 - - - 58 413 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 212 - Stage 1 - - - 430 - Stage 2 - - 253 - Approach ES WS S8 HCM Control Delay,s 0.4 0 19.4 HCM LOS C: Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBI WBR SBLn1 _ Capacity(veh/h) 856 329 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.057 ❑.243 HCM Control Delay(s) 9.5 19.4 HCM Lane LOS A C NCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.9 The Traffic Management Consultant Page F-10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PVUKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TALC MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX G CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2044 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Int Delay,s/treh 1-1 Move WUBT Lane Configurations 14 Traffic Vol,veh/h 17 663 1426 1 13 24 Future Vol,veh/h 17 663 1426 1 13 24 Conflicting Peds,#/hr ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 - Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 I00 100 100 160 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 4 4 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 716 1597 1 23 34 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1598 0 0 2336 1598 Stage 1 - - - - 1598 - 5tage 2 - 738 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Fidwy 5tg 1 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Ffdw•y 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 415 - - - 41 133 Stage 1 - 184 - Stage 2 - 476 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 415 40 133 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 160 - Stage 1 1.79 Stage 2 476 Approach EB WB 5B HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 45.9 HCM LOS L Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR S$LnI Capacity(veh/h) 415 143 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 0.398 HCM Control Delay(s) 13,9 - 45.9 HCM Lane LOS 6 E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.7 The Traffic Management Consultant Page G-1 Puukapu Place rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5: Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic Withouf Project WW" h Mt Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement . EBL EST EBR'. W8L WBT WBR NBt NOT NB.R SBL. 5BT SSR Lane Configurations T4 4� +� 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 18 657 0 1 1404 9 1 0 3 3 0 21 Future Vol,vehjh 18 657 0 1 1404 9 1 0 3 3 0 21 Conflicting Peds,ft/hr 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None None None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 - 0 2 - 0 Grade,% - 0 0 0 it Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,°A 0 S 0 0 4 33 0 0 0 0 0 7 Mvmt Flow 17 710 0 1 1558 12 1 0 2 2 0 17 Ma cir/Minor Ma•orl Ma•or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flom All 1570 0 0 710 0 0 2319 2316 710 7311 2310 1554 Stage 1 - - - - 744 744 - 1566 1566 - Stage 2 - - 1575 1572 - 745 744 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up FIdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3-363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 426 - 899 - 27 38 437 27 39 134 Stage - 410 424 - 141 174 Stage 2 - - - - 139 172 - 409 424 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 426 - 899 23 36 437 26 37 134 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 95 137 - 26 37 - Stage 1 - 394 407 - 135 172 - Stage 2 120 170 391 407 - Approach EB WB _NB S8 HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 25.4 48.9 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Ma•ar Mvmt NBLnI EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 5BLn7. Capacity(veh/h) 179 426 899 100 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 0.039 0.001 0.183 HCM Control Delay(s) 25.4 13.8 9 0 48.9 HCM Lane LOS D B A A - E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 0-1 ❑ 0.6 The Traffic Management Consultant Page G-2 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic Withouf Project Intersects I n r Delay,s/veh 2.2 MovemL. � ST WRR. L SBR - Lane Configurations ' 14 Traffic Vol,veh/h 38 625 1321 7 23 94 1. Future Vol,veh/h 38 625 1321 7 23 94 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 ' Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 100 0 Veh in Median Storage,##- 0 0 2 Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 0 0 8 Mvmt Flow 45 694 1374 11 29 63 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minbt2 V Conflicting How All 1385 0 0 2164 1380 Stage 1 - - - 1380 - Stage 2 - - 784 Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 6.4 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg Z - 5.4 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 - 3.5 3.373 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 488 - - - 53 171 Stage 1 236 - Stage 2 - 453 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 488 48 171 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 186 - Stage 1 - - - 214 - Stage 2 453 Approach E8 WB 5B HCM Contral Belay,s 0.8 ❑ 46.2 HCM Lbs E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity(veh/h) 488 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.093 0.524 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.1 46.2 HCM Lane LOS 8 E HCM 95th% ile Q(veh) 0.3 - 2.6 The Traffic Management Consultant Page G-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection An Irrt Delay, s/veh C3.7 [Vl�ement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t Traffic Vol,veh/h 17 1482 832 4 3 11 Future Vol,veh/h 17 1482 832 4 3 11 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - none - None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,k- 0 0 2 Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 700 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 25 1423 998 11 2 10 Ma-or/Minor Majorl Ma•or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1009 0 0 2477 1004 Stage 1 - - - 10.04 - Stage 2 - 1473 Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - S.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5,4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 695 - 33 296 Stage 1 - - 357 - Stage 2 - - 212 - Platoon blocked,%: Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 695 - 32 296 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 171 - Stage 1 - - 344 Stage 2 - - 212 Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 18.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR Sl5Ln1 Capacity(veh/h) 695 - 270 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 0.042 HCM Control Delay(s) 10.4 - 18.9 HCM Lane LOS B C HCM 95th%tile q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page G-4 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5: Ishihara Farm Rd/Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy _2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1 moiollr &t EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W_ _B_R _N_BL NBT NBR_ SBL SBT 58R Lane Configurations 'k +1� 4 4 Traffic Vol,vehf h 16 1467 3 0 822 3 1 0 1 3 0 14 Future Vol,veh/h 16 1467 3 0 822 3 1 0 1 3 0 14 Conflicting Peds,#/ r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None None Storage Length 50 Veh in Median Storage,4- 0 - 0 - - 2 - - ❑ - Grade,% - a ❑ 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 25 100 100 100 100 300 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, 90 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 47 1394 6 0 1003 2 1 ❑ 1 6 0 7 Major/Minor Ma•orl M&r2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1005 0 0 1400 0 0 2499 2496 1397 2496 2498 1004 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1491 1491 - 1004 1004 - 5tage 2 - - - 1008 1005 - 1492 1494 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 41 - - 7,1 6.5 6.2 7,1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5-5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 697 - 494 20 29 174 20 29 296 Stage 1 - - 156 189 - 294 322 Stage 2 - - - 292 322 - 156 188 Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 697 494 - - 19 27 174 19 27 296 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 117 141 - 19 27 - 5tage 1 - 146 176 274 322 Stage 2 285 322 145 175 A roach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 31.1 142.8 HCM LOS ❑ F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBI CBR WBL WBT WBR 5BLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 140 697 494 38 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-014 0.067 0 342 HCM Control Delay(s) 31.1. 10.5 0 142.8 HCM Lane LOS ❑ B A f HCM 95th%tile CL(veh) 0 0.2 0 1.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page C Puukapu Place Rezoning NCM 6th TWSC 6:Mamalahoa HwY&Keaka Kea PI _ 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic Without Project Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL 'SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 57 1414 733 21 50 91 Future Vol,vehf h 57 1414 733 21 5o 91 Conflicting Peds,4/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,tt- 0 0 2 Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 I00 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flow 57 1372 843 45 25 68 Major/Minor M_ajorl _ Major2 Min_vr2 _ Conflicting Flow All 888 0 0 2352 866 Stage i - - - 866 - Stage 2 - 1486 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.49 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.49 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-I Maneuver 771 - - 37 353 Stage 1 - 400 - Stage 2 - - - 200 - Platoon blacked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 771 - - 34 353 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 168 - Stage 1 - 370 Stage 2 200 Approach EB WB 5B HCM Control Relay,s 0.4 0 24.9 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT_ WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity(veh/h) 771 273 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.074 0.342 HCM Control Delay(s) 10 24.9 HCM Lane LOS B C HCM 95th%tile q(veh) 0.2 1.5 The Traffic Management Consultant Page G-6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE FOR THE PROPOSED PU' UKAPU PLACE REZONING KAMUELA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII TAX MAP KEY: (3) 6-4-024:027 APPENDIX H CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS 2040 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1: Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Dolay,s/veh 1-2 Movern6rit. , EBL EBT WBT WBR 5131. SBR Lane Configurations t 1� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 17 678 3.440 1 13 24 Future Vol,veh/h 17 678 1440 1 13 24 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 165 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 - 2 - Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 4 4 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 732 1613 1 23 34 Major/Minor Maori Ma ort MIh0f2 Conflicting Flow Ail 1614 0 0 2368 1614 Stage 1 - - - 1614 - Stage 2 - - 754 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 410 - 39 130 Stage 1 - 181 - Stage 2 - - 468 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 410 - 38 130 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 158 - Stage 1 - 176 Stage 2 46R Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 47.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Ma or Mvmt EBL EST WBl WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 410 140 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 CAN NCM Control Delay(s) 14 47.3 HCM Lane LOS B E NCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 1.8 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-1 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 2:West Dwy&Ma malahoa 1-1 wy 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Inters"ficm Int Delay,s/veh 0 Movement 68T EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR _ Lane Configurations T4 ' .I Y Traffic Vol,vein/h 684 7 1 1436 4 0 Future Vol,veh/h 684 7 1 1436 4 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 54 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,90 - - 0 2 Grade,% 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 0 U 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 739 7 1 1608 4 0 Major/Minor Majorl _ Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All D 0 746 0 2353 743 Stage 1 - - 743 - Stage 2 - 1610 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 871 40 418 Stage 1 - 474 - Stage 2 - 182 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 871 - 40 418 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 163 - Stage 1 - 474 - 5tage J 182 - Approach EB WB NB HCV!Control Oelay,s 0 G 7.7.6 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 163 871 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 0.001 HCM Control Delay(s) 27.6 - - 9.1 HCM Lane LDS D A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-2 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 4.Center Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Int Delay,s/veh ❑ - 13 Lane Configurations I t Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 679 S 2 1434 3 1 Future Vol,veh/h 679 5 2 1434 3 1 Conflicting Peds,#R/hr 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None Storage Length - 50 - Veh in Median Storage,#10 - - 0 2 Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor loo 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 0 0 4 0 0 Mvmt Flow 733 5 2 1606 3 1 MajqjjrMinor Majorl _Major2 Iyli orl. Conflicting Flow All 0 0 738 ❑ 2346 736 Stage 1 - - - - 736 - Stage 2 - - 1610 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5,4 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 877 - 40 422 Stage 1 477 - Stage 2 - - - 182 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 877 40 422 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 163 - Stage 1 - - - 477 - Stage 2 182 - roach. EB IIB NB: HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 24 HCM LOS C Minor LanojMajor Mvmt NBLn3 . EBT EBR. WBL Vli'8T Capacity(veh/h) 193 - - 877 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - 0,002 - HCM Control Delay(s) 24 - - 9.1 HCM Lane LCIS C - - A HCM 95th'/.tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - ❑ - The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-3 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5:Ishihara Farm RdlEarl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Kk 'fit Ot'Iay, S/VE'I-• 06 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WEIR NEIL NBT NBA S6L SBT 5BR Lane Configurations T4 1� 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 18 658 3 1 1407 9 8 0 4 3 ❑ 21 Future Vol,veh/h 18 658 3 1 1407 9 S 0 4 3 0 21 Conflicting Peds,ft/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - None None Storage Length 50 - 50 Veh in Median Storage,##- 0 _ - 0 - - 2 - 2 Grade,% 0 - 0 U 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 104 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 5 0 0 4 33 0 0 ❑ 0 0 7 Mvmt Flaw 17 711 3 1 1562 12 8 0 2 2 0 17 Major/Minor Ma'orl Ma ort Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1574 0 0 714 0 0 2326 2323 713 2318 2318 1568 Stage 1 - - - - - - 747 747 - 1570 1570 Stage - - 1579 1576 748 748 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 IS 4 3.3 3-5 4 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 424 - - 895 - 26 38 435 27 38 133 Stage 1 - - 408 423 - 140 173 - 5tage 2 - - - - 139 172 - 408 423 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 424 - - 895 22 36 435 26 36 133 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 96 139 - 121 152 - Stage 1 - - - 392 406 134 173 Stage 2 - 121 172 390 406 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.3 0 39.6 36.6 HCM LOS E E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 114 424 895 132 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.088 0.039 0.001 0-139 HCM Control Delay(s) 39.6 13.8 9 36.6 HCM Lane LOS E B A E HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 0 0.5 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-4 Puukapu Place Rezoning NCM 6th 7 WSC 6: Ma mala hoa Hwy&Keaka Kea PI _ 2040 AM Peak Hour Traffic With Protect Intersection Int Delay s/veli 2-2 EBL EST W13T WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 38 627 1324 7 23 94 Future Vol,veh/h 38 627 1324 7 23 94 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#• 0 0 2 Grade,% - 0 0 0 Peak flour Factor 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 4 9 2 0 0 8 MVmt Flow 45 696 1377 11 29 63 Major/Minor Ma orl _ Ma'ar2_ Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1 388 0 0 2169 1383 Stage 1 - - - 1383 - Stage 2 786 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - 6.4 6.28 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.236 3.5 3.372 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 487 - 52 171 Stage 1 - 235 - Stage 2 - - 453 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 487 - - 47 171 Mov Cap-2 Mareuver 185 - Stage 1 - 213 Stage 2 - 453 Approach ES WB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0.8 0 46.2 f ICM LOS L Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WST WBR SBLn1 Capacity(ueh/h} 487 175 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.093 0.524 HCM Control Delay(s) 13.1 46.2 HCM Lane LOS B L HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 2.6 The Traffic Management Consultant Page 11-5 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 1:Mamalahoa Hwy&Waikelehua PI 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veh (U Movement CBL EBT WBT WBR. SBL SBR Lane Configurations t 1� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 17 1503 855 4 3 11 Future Vol,veh/h 17 1503 855 4 3 11 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 165 0 Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 0 2 Crane,% - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 3 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 25 1443 1026 11 2 1016 i Major/Minor Imo' .F --.:_.Ma '.. #U9"M Conflicting Flow Ail 1037 0 0 2525 1032 Stage 1 - - - - 1032 - Stage 2 - - - 1493 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy 5tg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 678 - - 31 285 Stage 1 - 347 Stage 2 - 208 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 678 - - 30 285 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 167 - Stage 1 - - 334 - Stage 2 208 Approach ES WB 5B FiCM Control Delay,s 0.2 0 19.4 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EST WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 678 261 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 0.043 HCM Control Delay(s) 10.5 19.4 HCM Lane LOS B C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0,1 0.1 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-6 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 2:West Dwy&Mamalahoa HWV 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veli 0.4 Move EBT EBR WCL WBT NBL N13R Lane Configurations 1� i 'T' Traffic Vol,veh/h 1489 17 6 845 15 10 Future Vol,veh/h 1489 17 6 845 15 10 Conflicting Peds,#1/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None . None Storage Length 50 - ❑ Veh in Median Storage,40 - 0 2 _ Grade,% D - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 3 0 0 2 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1608 17 6 946 15 10 Major/Minor Ma orl Ma'or2 Minarl Conflicting Flaw All ❑ 0 1625 0 2575 1617 Stage 1 - - - 1617 - Stage 2 - 958 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5-4 _ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 406 29 129 Stage 1 - - 180 _ Stage 2 - 376 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 406 29 129 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 154 - Stage 1 - - - 180 - Stage 2 370 - Aggroach 6B WB NB, HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 35.4 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Nf3Lnl EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity{veh/h} 143 406 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.]75 0.0 P3 HCM Control Delay(s) 35-4 14 HCM Lane LOS E B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 4.6 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-7 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 4:Center Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Praect Int Delay,s/veh 0.3 movemen- Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 1485 14 5 838 13 9 Future Vol,veh/h 1485 14 5 838 13 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - bone Storage Length - 50 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,#0 - - 0 2 Grade,% 0 - - ❑ 0 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,X 3 0 0 2 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1604 14 5 939 13 9 Maar/Minor Ma'orl Ma'or2 Minurl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1618 0 2560 1611 Stage 1 - - - - 1611 - Stage 2 - - 949 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy 5tg 1 - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 408 - 29 130 Stage 1 - - - 182 - Stage 2 - - 379 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 408 29 130 Mau Cap-2 Maneuver - - 155 Stage 1 - - - - 182 Stage 2 374 Approach EB WS NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.1 34-S HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 144 408 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.153 0.012 HCM Control Delay(s) 34.5 13.9 HCM Lane LOS D B HCM 95th%tile 4(veh) 0.5 0 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-8 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 5: Ishihara Farm Rd Earl's Dwy&Mamalahoa Hwy 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Int Delay,s/veh 03 Mnverrri"t EK7:7 '.- 0111, ,.VM, gal. _NjRT::NM%- Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 16 1470 9 1 824 3 5 0 1 3 0 14 Future Vol,veh/h 16 1470 9 1 824 3 5 0 1 3 0 14 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop stop stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 50 - 50 _ Veh in Median Storage,#- 0 - - 0 _ 2 _ _ 2 - Grade,% - 0 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 3.00 100 10O 100 100 100 300 1O0 Heavy Vehicles,% ❑ 3 0 ❑ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 12 1397 18 1 1005 2 5 O 1 6 0 7 Ma ar Minor Ma ort. M ore' 8+160 Conflicting Flow All 1007 0 0 1415 0 0 2442 2439 1406 2439 2447 1006 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1430 1430 - 1008 1008 - Stage 2 - - - - 1012 1009 - 1431 1439 - Critical Hdwy 4,1 - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pat Cap-1 Maneuver 696 _ 488 - - 22 32 172 22 32 295 Stage 1 - - 169 202 - 292 321 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 291 320 - 169 200 - Platoon blocked,% - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 696 - - 488 - - 21 31 172 22 31 29S Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 134 159 - 134 159 Stage 1 - - - - - - 166 199 - 287 320 - Stage 2 284 319 165 197 Approach EB We Na rg. HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 0 32,1 25.3 NCM LDS 0 D Minor.Lane/Ma Qr.Mvmt NBLn1 E8L EBT EBR. .WSL wiBT- W$A$gLtt1. Capacity(veh/h) 139 696 - - 488 - - 190 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0-043 0.017 - 0.002 - 0.068 HCM Control Delay(s) 32.1 10.3 - - 12,4 - - 25.3 HCM Lane LOS D B _ B D HCM 95th%tile q(veh) 0.1 0.1 _ _ 0 _ 0.2 The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-9 Puukapu Place Rezoning HCM 6th TWSC 6: Mamalahoa Hwy& Keaka Kea PI 2040 PM Peak Hour Traffic With Project Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 2.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations �j t lt� Y Traffic Vol,veh/h 57 1417 736 21 50 91 Future Vol,veh/h 57 1417 7315 21 50 91 Conflicting Peds,#f/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control f-ree Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 100 - 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 ❑ 2 - Grade,% 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 25 100 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles,% 0 2 1 0 9 2 Mvmt Flow 228 1374 846 45 25 158 Major/Minor Ma ort Ma-or2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 891 0 0 2699 869 Stage i - - - 869 - Stage 2 - - 1830 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.49 6.22 Critical lidwy Stg 1 - 5.49 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.49 - Foilow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.581 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 769 - 22 351 Stage 1 399 Stage 2 - - 134 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 769 —15 351 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 113 - Stage 1 - 281 Stage 2 - 134 ApRroach EB W B SB HCM Control Delay,s 1.7 0 32.1 HCM LDS D {Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WB1 WBR SBLn1 Capacity(veh/h) 769 224 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.296 - 0.416 HCM Control Delay(s) 11.6 - 32.1 HCM Lane LOS B D HCM 951h%tile Q(veh) 1.2 7.9 Notes Volurne exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 304s +; Computation Not Defined `:All major volume in Platoon The Traffic Management Consultant Page H-10 South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee P.O.Box 2874 Karttuela,M 96743 SKTSCsecretary00gmai Isom I Inuary 5,2021 County of Hawaii,Planning Department Aupuni Center- 10 1 enter101 PauahI Strvet,Suite 3 Hilo,H196720 Attention: Director Zendo Kern Subject,Ka'i:pidehu Land LLC;State Land Use Boundary Amendment petition,Repeal Rezoning Ordinance No.02-107,and Change of Zone Application;TMK:(3)6-4-024:027 Aloha Director Kern, The South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee(SKTSC)held a discussion at its)uly 14,2020 meeting regarding the Ka'upulehu Land LLC project on the east side of Waimea.The committee was glad to welcome the discussion and learn more about the project,especially as 1t related to any impact to the main thoroughfare in Waimea.SKTSC was presented with the applicant's plans while representatives detailed Further aspects. During the July 2020 discussion,community members inquired about the purpose and intent of having three ingress/egress points giving access to the property.Concern was raised about this initial number of access points.While having three entry points into the property gives patrons greater'opportunity to access the future businesses,This]n tura affects the length and overall safety along the highway by reducing the length of the turning and merge lanes on Marnalahoa Highway.It was recommended by SKTSC to consider reduci rig the ingress/egress to a total of two.Limiting the access points would create for a safer corridor by maintaining some length of the existing center turn lanes,and in turn diminish the opportunity for accidents by reducing points of contact,Furthermore,the landowner would see Fewer costs to improving and changing the roadway and/or utilities along their parcel frontage.The representing agents and planners took to heart the recommendation from the South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee and shared that they would consider the community input.Towards the end of 2020,SKTSC was again approached by the project's agents with an update to the proposed property ingress/egress.After taking the committee's concerns and feedback,the proposed plan now details two ingress/egress.As mentioned,this recommendation presents greater benefits to the landowner and to the larger community, The South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee is grateful to be a part of this process,providing ail opportunity for community members to weigh in on projects that may impact traffic safety.Please accept this letter in show of support for the proposed changes and for the project work going forward. Thank you for allowing the South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee an Opportunity to comment and weigh in on this project. Please feel free to contact me with any questions at sktscsecretary@gmail.com. Mahalo, James Hustace,Chairman South Kohala Traffic Safety Committee cc: Dr.Herbert Richards-HawaVi County Council,District 9 Councilor Steven Lim,Carlsmith Ball LLP EXHIBIT 7 } V 3$4001057 3+7�'U07i5�u � ' 3+i4C]L19 053 S. �Cy�Ci 3640011 57 �a �00 3WO1159 w rn 38500�11L fro C7 p O Pr: p A� CD ,,a 0 c7 a°r D La Q_ ;iG4001039 �p v 'oma 'oma PRQPER7Y m _-'. - ' . - 304024(304 w -- - 1p�` 3640 v \ 24005 ..�...:. `� `t'6; 1�dPH�� `.•`' uQ�`.. �d� � 384024006 (2a �PIpAP� lop � L?G �t� '•' Yui 640-24007 ' p �"a �a A G pp .. $� o a aeo p �- oq ca� r r o o ' UP '. W �a c° oa 364006087 10 3640060,u '�, �r110 . 0 ga a �a 364024013 O rY Y �— Yom— !�� ��—'��� ��"� � l , '.' ��� 14��❑ -. 364008087 364033006 `,, 3 364c KAkUPULEHU LAND LLC 367002068 TMK- (3)6-4-024:027 9 - � �-�`�-- •r, 5LU Map bZp69 U-Urban Land Use district A Agricultural Land Use District EXHIBIT 8 sT 3670 `� "64 3 G 02077 —�` 3 U 3 39 3664038011 ' .• 364001 051 364001158 ' 1 364001053 � a 364001157 364001159 364001155 a /ea � 365004110 � � 0 CD ti W Lg 364001039 0 $ pix 'a4, tp T. SUBJECT PROPERTY tp yp 364024004 f ca 026"0$ w v3 �00�a�, ~364024006 rndU Y �p� '� r 36402406 f - ..: a � 0 ' 'r•. is fl`� 364DO6087 o QG top- 364006086 364006086 �n �� J � N 'Poll o� 3$4024013 1CpY11L�Rq �� d ` ,Kpu1►C�'- � 1 - �- ' 364033a9� 364008487 364033006 Jif _ 364 4033062 '.. 367002068 KA'UPULEHU LAND LLC -TMK: (3}5-4-024:027 LUPAG Map mdu- Medium Density Urban ' SN Idu-Low Density Urban 367002071 3s4aaao1l} EXHIBIT 9 �,y,A . _ ial-Important Ag Lands � J M LEONARD PLANNING, LLC P.a.Box 11321-Hilo,HI 95381 -Tel(808)896-3459 •E-mail:jmleonard@mac.com April 26, 2017 Sean Nalei maile, Ilawai`i Island Archaeologist State Historic Preservation Division, Hawaii Island Office 40 Po`okela Street Hilo, Hawai`I 96720 Email: DLNR.Iiiiake.SHPD@hawaii.gov and Scaii.P.nalciiiiaile@hawaii.gov SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A LETTER OF"NO-EFFECT" PER THE REQUiRMENTS FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION KA`UPULEHU LAND, LLC PU`UKAPU PROPERTY,TMK: (3) 6-4-024:027 WAIMEA, SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAII Dear Mr. Nalcimaile : I ani assisting the property owners in preparing a change of zone application for the subject property located in the Pu`ukapu Homesteads Subdivision area of Waimea on the Island of Hawaii, as shown in the attached Project Location and Aerial Photo Maps, As part of the application requirements, we are required to obtain a letter of"no-effect" from your Division or prepare an inventory report. I understand from our prior discussion at your office and your review of the project files that there have been no prov"ous archaeological surveys that included the area of this property. However, the property has been largely disturbed, having been part of the Pu-ukapu Homestead farm lots and extensively fanned in the past. Consequently, as evidenced by the disturbed nature of the property and its long history of agricultural use, it is thought that there would little likelihood of finding features of historical significance on the property and, thus, the proposed rezoning of the property would result in having no effect on historic properties in the area. Regarding the prior agricultural use of the property, the property has a long and notable history of farming having been owned by the Ishihara family, which had farmed this and the adjoining lands for generations, growing primarily celery and a variety of colo crops. In fact, Tamao Isliihara, who was the mainstay of the Ishihara Farm, was known as the"Celery King"of Waimea and was a renowned farmer and community leader in the Waimea community. (See the attached 2009 Ke Qla article,which talks of the produce from the Ishihara Farm,and a portion of an article from Hawaii News, Hi.sioi-v and Opinion about the life of Tamao Ishihara). I have also included for your reference, a series of maps showing the location of what was the Ishihara Farm, comprising Lots 3 and 4 of the.Pu`ukapu Homesteads, shown on the 1893 Map of the Pu'ukapu Homesteads and 1923 Pu`ukapu Homestead, Hawaii Territory Survey Map. The Ishiliara family purchased the land in the 1930`s and farmer] the land up until about 1990. J M Leonard Planning, LLC P.O. Box 1132 1, Hilo, Hawaii 96721 EXHIBIT 10a The parcel that is being proposed for rezo;Sing encompasses approximately 5.35 acres of the prior Isltihara Farrn in the area immediately adjacent to Mamalahoa Highway and includes the two residential structures that were part of the original faun. The propose change of zoning would create an approximately 2.35 acre commercial portion in the area adjacent to the Highway and allow for the subdivision of the remaining portion into three 1-acre lots, including creation of separate lots for each of the existing residences. The existing buildings would be unaffected by the proposed rezoning and would remain as-is following the subdivision of the property. ❑n behalf of the property owner, Ka`upulehu Land, LLC, and as required for the submittal of an application for a change of zoning for the property, this letter is to request a finding of"no-effect" from the proposed rezoning of the property, or guidance as to what additional information or level of study would be required far you to make that determination. Plcase let me know if you require any additional information or have any questions regard-»g the proposed rezoning action or the affected property. Thank you for your assistance in this regard, Sincerely, James M. Leonard JM Leonard Planning, LLC Attachments—Six(6) Maps and Articles Cc; John Metzler, Managing Member, Ka`upulehu Land Donna Leialoha, Ka`upulehu Land } OAI1114.FGE l,tIr •I,- AVANAYMCASK i l A'I N:'i•IY.14:II.N%%11 L1 LtINffgs:W INON11 Y I.AIlP ANI I tIATURA1.N.{I II IALTN f�fr. ii MLll].gi�N��N WA}Nib RLY1i11f j MANAtIr'#II,N ij ROA CRT K h1A51f0A �"I'd IV Pd ry� t i } IIk Y1111-3111y @� ]EFF7lEY T.PE,►RSUY IA-PIITY PIRFCTul-WAT tv t A[}IA•1 k•nE�+an� f� ••.% "MTIMI MA1t VAN RFt'k1:A 1 ION 111'1Llfib of{'CHV&YANU 6 VGKMa�1N1N ON WATT}It F.'&AIpluN KAM WRIP NT STATE OF HAWAII c-11VATA IN 1k1N.A!hAFFW5TA11 IMu �Y IN1L 18NNIIN/,NI}YLMn COW Ff It 11 NI1'MI.N Sra DFPARTME1T OF LAND AND NAT1RAI,RESOURCES "JW-AAI kYAmJw 1woo-III111fE M t1 p1M I I-}A'lryUstE 4A7 N N STA7T MSTORlC PRFSERVA-HON DIVISION AM AIAhl IP14FR Vt. INW"h kN KAKU1111iL•'WA BUII_D3NG "''A 11Ks 601 KALMOKILA RIND,STL-555 KAPOLFl,f[AWAt1 967117 August 3 ll '_'(117 IN REPLY REFER TO' Michael Yee, Planning Director Lag TtiFo.; 2017.00897 County of Hawaii Doe,No.; 1708AR 19 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo.H196720 Dear Mr.Yee: SUBJECT: Chanter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review- Count)-of flawai'i Rew-ining for Vut'upulehu Land,LLC: Waimea Ahupua`a,South Kohala District.Island of Rawai}i TMK:(3)6-4-024:027 Thank you for the opportunity to review this information in preparation for a re-zoning application that was received' by our office on May 2, 2417. According to the information. the land owner has requested a chanbe of zone from agriculture (5) to 2.35 acres of Commercial and 3 acres of Agriculture (I A). The agricultural area will then be subdivided into three lots by the owner. The lot already contains two residential structures, and the use of those structures would continue after the subdivision. A review of our records indicates that there are no previously identified historic properties in the vicinity of this project, and that no adequate archaeological inventory survey was conducted on this subject parcel. Our records further indicate that SHF❑ has previously reviewed zone change applications for Parcel 027 and stated that the potential to impact significant historic properties is unlikely due to prior extensive land alteration associated with modem small far:icing (January 8, 1990 Memorandum; February 12, 1990. File No, 90-373, Doc, No. 7433E). SHPD has also indicated that Parcel 027 is "outside the area known to contain segments of the Waimea Field System which comprises significant agricultural features" (September 2, 1992; Log No. 6065, Doc. No. 0296x). Additionally,aerial photographs indicate that the proposed project area was graded during its use as farm land. Based an the information provided, SHPD's determination is no historic properties affected for the proposed project,Therefore,the county's permit issuance rocess may continue. Attach to Permit: In event that subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains, cultural deposits,artifacts,sand deposits,or sink holes are identified during the demolition and/or construct ion work, cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance,and contact the State Historic Preservation Division,at(808)323-4521. Please contact Amy Rubingh at (808) 323-4521 or at n .Rub•1 1t()hawai for questions regarding archaeological resources or this letter. Aloha, Sn"t a-, il . U-J" Susan A. Lebo,PhD Archaeology Branch Chief cc:James Leonard-' leopard Qmacxorri EXHIBIT 10b t. t' 'V ;3630ploq$ V VIRV V rn 00 LP A 3'34001039 -Sa > 0 11 Apo & SUBJECT PROPERTY j 0 364024004 r. I? 364OZ400 3MO24W6 A-5a CN-7.5 02 q. 'ro ao oo A- ,q 00, FA-U P�p % 364006086 lop, 101 • 5-1 LP 364024013 01-1 tp -5- 364008087 364033006 A-5a 3640 7002MB nnr, KA'UPULEHU LAND LLC RA-1 a \X -10p- TMK: (3)6-4-024:027 Zoning Map A-5a-Agricultural District(minimum building IT 11 f site of 5 acres) CV 0 -- 1 '01 A • s •+•• y '1 IrAir.�p r fa C: x r, � r ; �� � yrs � • �� '" a `t] 'r ■�� • '�` •4 ■ '� •tea ' ■' ay U5 - L IL ar _ a .. � ■ f }1` • ` M A ■ �by - PA • r • � f • EXHIBIT 12 oy k ZoNi ALF VE Ar ONE y k /1 NE X BASEMAP.FIRM SASEMAP yr ASSESS M EM TOOL LAYER LEGEN -*``���•lei Flood Hazard Assessment Report r�r r r s it y- %vww.hawaiinfip.org SaECIAt FLOOD HAIARU AREAS ISFHAsl SVBiECT TO INUNDATION BY 7 771E 1%ANNUAL,CHANCE FLOOD -'Fhe 1%annual chance!lova(190- n year!,arse know as the base flood,is the Flood that has a lad chance o1 heirg eil"ed O exceeded In any given year,SFuRS Include Zone A,RE, — AH,AU, V,and VE.-he Bane Flood Uievatian 1BFEl•s the water surface e'evatior of t`,e 1% annual chance Rood. Vandatary Rood insurance Property Information Nates; parchasoappliminthmeLonet: CIIUNTY: HAWAII Zone Na8PFdetermined. TMV NO: l3)C-4.0I4:027 Ione AE:BFE determined. WATERSHED: tAMIMAUMAU PARCEL ADDRESS: ADDRESS NOT DETERMINED Ione AH:Flood depths o1 1 to 3 feet{usually areas of pondinRl, KAMUELA,W 96743 BFE determined Zone AD. Flood depths o' 1 to 3 feet{usually sheen Pow on Flood Hazard Information sloping tetrain 1;avcrage depthsde*crmiried. FIRN INDEX DAT L; SEPTEMBER 24,2U17 Zone V:Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard(wave Amon]: tMER OF W.APCHANGEISI: NONE no BFE del errnined- FE%1A FIRM PANEL• 1551660144E zone VE Coastal flood Lone with velocity hazard jwave act onl, pRN£L€FF€4C71VE PATE: $f PTE MBER 19,Z01 aFE determined. Zone AEF. Floodway areas in Zone AE.The lloodway Is the channel of stream plus any adjacem Poodplaln areas that must be kept free of encroachment to Thar the 1st annual chance Rona carr be carried without�ncrea3irig she BE E. NON-SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA•Art area in a law-1o•moderate risk THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN ATSUNAMI EVACUTION ZONE; No Trod Zore.No mandatory flood insurante purchase requirements apply, FOR MOaE INFO,V+Str http:llYfYrw.sed.Ylawari.gpyj bat coverage is available in participating comnrunittes. THIS PROPERTY IS TN N A DAM EVACUA 'ON LONE: YES 1 iA-00431 Zone ICS IX shadedl,Areas of 0.]76 arruar chance food;areas a= FOR MORE INFO,VISIT:http://dlnrerg.hawail.gov/damJ 1%mrual chance flood with ave-age deaths Di less than 1 Foot or with drainage areas less than I square mile; and areas protected by'evees From I%anpual chance food. Ione 1L Areas determined To be uultildr the 0.29E annual rhdnce 0 200 400 FA floodplain, P,scla+mfr:rhe Hawaii Deportment al land and Natural Resources IJIUVR/assumes no rrspomibMty rinsing from the use,octutacy, completeness,and hmehticss of any inimfmartoo ronsnined In this report. Viewerlvussars are OTHER FLOOD AREAS remaansiblr jar verifying the accoracy of the informotron and agree to rndemn jy the D1NR,"s officers,apd empiar ers from any Ifabilitywhich inoy drisr from its use of its dara ar rnjwmaran. Zone D. Unstudied areas where flood hazards are undeter- mined,but flooding Is possible-No mandatary flood insurance r/this mao has keen,dephfrrd as'PRELIMINARY:please note that it Is being prowaed for Into rmotiunit?purposes p krehaw apply,but coverage is availahie it participating commu- and is not to be used jorflmd rrsurrrce mnng Canrdcr your county ffoodpidrn mon agerjornaarrzonr drtvrmina' nlhes- nans to be used for compliance Ivith local floodplain rhanagemepr reaufnnori EXHIBIT 13 ENGINEERING 455 E. Lan ka Street P A R T N E R Hilo,t"tawaiiii 96720 www.epinc.pro 16112-17-01 June 17, 2021 County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanao'a Street Hilo, Hl 96720 Attention: Mr. Keith Okamoto, Manager-Chief Engineer Subject: Kaupulehu Land Waimea Development TMK. 6-4-024: 027 Submitted herein is the water demand calculation for the Koupulehu Land Waimea Development project for your review and approval. The Kaupulehu Land Woimeo Development project will consist of 3 proposed commercial lots (Lots 1, 2 &3) and 6 residential lots (Lots 4 thru 9). The estimated water demand for this development is as follows Lai 1, 0.647 acre, Commercial, 5,000 s.f. one story retail/office use, with one 1,500 s.f. cafe restaurant 10 staff @ 15 gpdc = 1,500 gpd (non-food retail) 20 visitors @ 3 gpdc = 60 gpd (non-food retail) 200 meals @ 10 gpdc= 2,000 gpd (Cofe) 10 staff C 20 gpdc = 200 gpd (Cafe worker) Total = 3,760 gpd or 9.4 water units Lot 2,0.783 acre, Commercial, 7,000 s.f. one story retail/office use, non-food retail 35 staff @ 15 gpdc= 525 gpd 60 visitors @ 3 gpdc = 180 gpd Total = 705 gpd or 1.76 water units Lot 3, 0.916 acre, Commerciaf, 4,700 x 2 s.f. one story retail/office use, non-food retail 50 staff @ 15 gpdc = 750 gpd (non-food retail) 100 visitors @ 3 gpdc = 340 gpd (non-food retail) Total = 1050 gpd or 2.63 water units Howaii Los Vegas EXHIBIT 14a ` Mr. Keith Okamoto, RE. Manages-Chief Engineer Kaupulahu Land Waimea Development June 17,2021 Page 2 of 2 Lot d, RS-10, 12,634 SF 400 gpd per single family dwelling or 1 water units Use 5 $-inch meter Lot 5, RS=10 13,5455F 400 gpd per single family dwelling or T water units Use 518-inch meter Lot 6, RS-10 21,171 SF 400 gpd per single family dwelling or 1 water units Q_41 5/2&inch meter Lot 7, RS-10 18,679 SF 4aD gpd per single family dwelling or 1 water units Use 5f 8-inch meter Lot 8, RS-T 0 35,824 SF 400 gpd per single family dwelling or T water units Use1incfl teeter Lor 9, RS-10 29,882 SF 400 gpd per single family dwelling or T water units Use 5/8-inch meter No irrigation water is needed because the property is located at an area receiving adequate rainfall. If irrigation of the landscaping area is required, there is non-potable irrigation water source to this area. Total Water Usage= 7,915 gpd or 20 Water Units Conclusion: The Kaupuehu Land Waimea Development project will need twenty (20) water units for the proposed 9-101 Subdivision. Sincerely, ENGINEERING PARTNERS, iNC. Ye Wen Fang, P.E. Pr)ncipal � h Q}a4�W►L�ld f�.i t l7 IY DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAVI ovotxffPL„ ** 345 KEKUANAO'ASTREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE(808)951-8450 • FAX W8)961-8657 June 25,2021 Yen Wen Fang. P.E. Engineering Partners, Inc 455 East Lanikaula Street Hilo. HI 96720 Dear Mr. Fang: SUBJECT: Water' Usage Calculations for the Ka`upulehua Land NYairnen Development Applicant: Engineering Partners, Inc. Tax Map Key 6-4-024:027 The Department has reviewed the water demand calculations prepared by Engineering Partners, Inc.,showing the estimated water demand For the proposed project and find them acceptable. Based on the water demand calculations, the estimated average daily usage is 7,915 gallons per day{GPD},or 20 equivalent units of water at 400 GPD per unit. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Depart inenI's Rules and Regulations,a water calninitmew may be issued. Based on the 70 additional units of water needed. the required water comrltitrnenI deposit is$150,00 per additional unit,or$3.000.00. Remittance of the$3.000.00 water commitment deposit is requested as soon as possible so that a water commitment may be formally effected. The connlniIinent w i I I be in writing with specific dates and conditions stated. Upon receipt of the +nater coni rnitrnent deposit, we will provide our requirements for water service.applicable facilities charge due, and other conditions for Final approval. Therefore,water service to the proposed project will be contingent on corn pIiance with the following conditions: I Construct necessary water system improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to, the Following: a. service laterals that will accommodate the approprialely sized teeters to front each lot. b. install a reduced pressure type backPow prevention assembly within five(5)feet of the meter on private property- The installation of the backflow prevention assembly must be inspected and approved by the Deparlment before water service can be activated, and c. Subject to other agencies requirements to construct improvernents within the road right-of wary fronting Ilie property affected by the proposed development. the applicant shall be responsible far the relocation and adjusunenl of the Departlncnt's aIfecled water syslern facilities.should they be necessary. Submit construction plans.prepared by a professional eng1neer licensed in the State of Hawai'i, showing the work required for review and approval. . . . lV[atel; Our94osl qlt'ec7ous Wfsource. . . ?a `fVal,4 7jprie. . The l]apertment Of Water Supply iA an Equal Dppurturuty provider and employer. EXHIBIT 14b Mr. Yen Wen f=ang, Page 2 June 25,2421 2. Remit the prevailing facilities cliarle L�alance,which is subject to change.as shown below- FACILITIES CHARGE(FQ: 1 Existing service Paid Twen ty 20)add itionzI units LP$6,09.5; Q/tupiI —.—S L2 1,900.00 I'Mal(Subject to Change) S12I,900.0 1'lris is Atte and payable upon completion of the installation of the required�valer system improvements and prior to final subdivision approval Feeing granted. For your information, watercomm4ment deposits are credited rewards rhe Final facilities reguirernew for the development. Note that the amount of water Com niiImenr deposit may exceed the prevailing facilities charge amount; For example,when requests for time extensions continue and are approver!. Until the development is Finally completed, these are separ-ete and ranrelaied items. in the event that water commitment deposits exceed the facilities charge,no refunds are applicable. 3. Cairtply %4 11 all other applicable policies and requirements of the Deparmmenl's Rules and Regulations. Noncomp!ianee may be cause for voiding thi; water commitment, at which firne availability w i I I be subject to charige in accordance with prevailing water sysiern conditions. policies, and RUIes and Regulations. for your infornnation, the existing 12-inch waterline within Mamalaltoa Highway is adequate to provide the required 2,000-gallons per minute of flow for fire protection,as per the Department's Water System Standards. Should there be an) questions, please contact Mr. f'roy Sam Lira of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 255. Sincerely yours- VarY Keith K. Okamoto,RE. Manager-Chief Engineer 7'S:Snic cog}•-- Planning Depa+irnent Ka'upulehua Land Waimea Development Carlsmith Ball LLP DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HAWAII H I LO, HAWAII DATE: September 17, 2021 ftoxft"464W TO: Zendo Kern Planning Director FROM: Department of Public Works, Engineering Division SUBJECT: STATE LAND USE BOUNDARY AMENDMENT (PL-SLU-2021- 000001) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (PL-REZ-2021- 000006) Request: A-5a to CN-10 & RS-10 Applicant: Kaupulehu Land, LLC TM K: 6-4-024:027 We have reviewed the subject application forwarded by your memo dated August 18, 2021, and offer the following comments for your consideration- 1. onsideration:1. All earthwork activities including grading, grubbing, and stockpiling shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentary Control, of the Hawaii County Code. 2. All driveway connections and construction within the Mamalahoa Highway Right- of-Way shall conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawaii County Code. 3. Access to Mamalahoa Highway, including the provision of adequate sight distances, shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works. 4. Based on the proposed zoning, we recommend that the applicant provide improvements to subject property's Mamalahoa Highway frontage consisting of, but not limited to, pavement widening with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, drainage improvements, signs and markings, streetlights, and any relocation of utilities, meeting the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the approval of the Department of Public Works. Any future road widening setbacks as established by the Planning Department should be taken into consideration for the location of the improvements. 5. Install streetlights and traffic control devices as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. The applicant shall be responsible for the design, purchase, and installation of such devices. Planning Dep- . Exhibit— 4 County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 6. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TZAR) may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works. 7. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and not directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a construction permit. Any recommended drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to the construction of any proposed structures on the property. 8. All construction within Zones AO, AE, and AEF shall comply with Chapter 27, Floodplain Management, of the Hawaii County Code. 9. The subject parcel is in an area designated as Zone X, XS, AO, AE, and AEF on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) o Zone X is an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. o Zone XS is an area of moderate flood hazard corresponding to areas of the 500-year floodplain, areas of one-hundred-year flooding where average depths are less than one foot, areas of one-hundred-year flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile, and areas protected from the one-hundred-year flood by levees. o Zone AO is the Special Flood Hazard Area that corresponds to the areas of one-hundred-year shallow flooding (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain) where average depths are between one and three feet. Average whole-foot depths derived from the detailed hydraulic analyses have been determined within this zone. o Zone AE is the Special Flood Hazard Area that corresponds to the 100-year floodplains that are determined in the Flood Insurance Study by detailed methods. Base Flood Elevations (computed flood elevation from mean sea level) derived from the detailed hydraulic analyses have been determined at selected intervals within this zone. o Zone AEF is the floodway areas in Zone AE. The floodway is the channel of stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 100-year floodplains can be carried without increasing the Base Flood Elevation. Questions may be referred to Bryce Harada at 961-8042. County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer C+t V'A7'gR - S[, c� �9 :. DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAI`I 345 KEKLIANAC`A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720 TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 - FAX(808)961-8657 July 13,2021 COH PLfNlING DEPT Ms. Katherine A. Garson JUL 14 202 1;IP2:19 Carlsmith Ball LLP RECD HAND DELIVER-ED P.O. Box 686 Hilo, Hi 96720 Dear Ms. Garson: Subject: Water Commitment Time Extension for the Ka`upulehua Land Waimea Development Applicant- Engineering Partners Tax -Nlap Key 6-4-024:027 This is to acknowledge receipt of the required $3,000.00 water commitment deposit for the water commitment deposit for the subject project. We are enclosing Receipt No.4758154 for your files. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Department's Rifles and Regulations, a water commitment for the proposed development in the amount of 8,000 gallons per day, or 20 additional units of water at an average of 400 gal Ion s per day, per unit. is hereby granted untiI July 31. 2024,with the following conditions: 1. Construct necessary water system improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. service laterals that will accornrnodate the appropriately sized meters to front each lot, b. install a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within live(5) feet of the meter on private property. The installation of the backflow prevention assembly must be inspected and approved by the Department before water service can be activated,and C, subject to other agencies requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of way fronting the property affected by the proposed development,the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system Facilities, should they be necessary-. 1 Submit construction plans, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii. showing the work required for review and approval. .. Remit the prevailing facilities charge balance,which is subject to change, as shown below, FACILITIES CI-IARGE(FC): 1 Existing service raid 20 additional units n $6.095.001unit $121.900.00 Total(Subject to Change) x121,900.00 Plon n i rig Dep . . . Water, Our Wost Precious WSsource . . . 7g Wal-A $ ine . . . 4 3 .17 The Department of'Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Exhibit Ms. Katherine A. Garson Page 2 July 13, 2021 WATER COMMITMENT DEPOSIT (WCD): Twenty(20)additional units Ca $150.00/unit $3,000,00 Facilities Charge Balance(Subject to Change) $118,900.00 This is due and payable upon completion of the installation of the required water system improvements and prior to final subdivision approval being granted. For your information, water commitment deposits are credited towards the final facilities req uirement for the development. Note that the amount of water commitment deposit may exceed the prevailing facilities charge amount;for example, when reqnests for time extensions continue and are approved, Until the development is finally completed,these are separate and unrelated items. In the event that water commitment deposits exceed the facilities charge, no refunds are applicable. 4. Comply with all other applicable policies and requirements of the Department's Rules and Regulations. Noncompliance may be cause for voiding this water commitment, at which time availability wiII be subject to change in accordance with prevailing water system conditions,policies, and Rules and Regulations. For your 'information.the existing 12-inch waterline within Mamalahoa Highway is adequate to provide the required 2,1100-gallons per ininute of flow for Fire protection,as per the Department's Water System Standards. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Troy Sam ura of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 951-8070, extension 255. Sincerely yours, G L Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer TS:dfg Enc. copy — Planning Department Ka'upulehua Land Waimea Development C�of INATR. f DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAII • 345 KEKUANAO`ASTREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HAWAII 96720 �nP H7..R'�'•~ TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 - FAX (808) 961-8657 August 30, 2021 CUH PLANNING DEPT AUG 312021 PH2:3b TO: Mr. /_endo Kern, Director RECD HAND DELIVERED Planning Department FROM: Keith K. Okamoto. Manager-Chief Engineer SUBJECT: State land Use Boundary Amendment (PL-SLU-2021-000001) Request— Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (PL-REZ-2021-000006) Request—Agricultural —5 Acres (A-5a) to Neighborhood Commercial District— 10,000 Square Feet (CN-10) and Single—Family Residential-10,000 Square Feet (RS-10) Applicant— Kaupulehu Land LLC Tax Map Key 6-4-024:027 We have reviewed the subject application and have the following comments and conditions. Water can be made available from an existing 12-inch waterline along Mamalahoa I lighway. In accordance with the Department's existing water availability conditions, the water availability for the proposed lots is subject to change without notice. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Department's Rules and Regulations, a water commitment for the proposed development in the amount of 8,000 gallons per day, or 20 additional units of water at an average of 400 gallons per day, per unit, has been granted until July 31, 2024, with the following conditions: 1. COnStrUCt necessary water system improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. service laterals that will accommodate the appropriately-sized meters to front each lot, b. install a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five (5) feet ofthe meter on private property. The installation of the backflow prevention assembly must be inspected and approved by the Department before water service can be activated, and C. subject to other agencies requirements to construct improvements within the road right- ofway fronting the property affected by the proposed development, the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary. Planning Dept. Exhibit 5 Water, Our 9lrlost Precious l(esource. . . Xa riWai A ?sane . . . The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Mr. Zendo Kern, Director Page 2 August 30,2021 Submit construction plans, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, showing the work required for review and approval. 2. Remit the prevai ling facilities charge balance which is subject to change as shown below: FACILITIES CHARGE (FC): 1 Existing service Paid Twenty 20 additional units d) $6 095.001unit $121,900.00 Total(Subject to Change) $121,900.00 WATER COMMITMENT DEPOSIT(WCD): Twenty (20) additional units 2 $150.00lunit $3.000.00 Facilities Charge Balance (Subject to Change) $118,900.00 This is due and payable upon completion of the installation of the required water system improvements and prior to final subdivision approval being granted. For your information, water commitment deposits are credited towards the final facilities requirement for the development. Note that the amount of water commitment deposit may exceed the prevailing facilities charge amount: for example, when requests for time extensions continue and are approved. Until the development is finally completed, these are separate and unrelated items. In the event that water commitment deposits exceed the facilities charge, no refunds are applicable. 3. Comply with all other applicable policies and requirements of the Department's Rules and Regulations. Noncompliance may be cause for voiding this water commitment. at which time availability will be subject to change in accordance with prevailing water system conditions. policies, and Rules and Regulations. For your information, the existing 12-inch waterline within Mamalahoa I lighway is adequate to provide the required 2,000-gallons per minute of flow for fire protection, as per the Department's Water System Standards. Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Troy Samum of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-9070, extension 255. Sincerely yours, [it 1� I t44V Keith K. Okamoto, P.E. Manager-Chief Engineer ,rs:dfg copy— Calsmith Ball LLP Kaupuiehu Land LLC �IF Mitchell D.Roth Ramzi 1.Mansour Mayor Director *` Lee E.Lard ��;�;;•;,.* Brenda D. lakepa-Moses Managing Director Deputy Director County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 345 KeWarWa Street,Suite 41- Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Ph:(808)961-8083 ■ Fax:(808)961-8085 Email: cohdem@hawaiicounty.gov COH PLANNING DEPT MEMORANDUM SEP 23 2021 PH2:24 RECD HAND DELIVERED TO: Zendo Kem, Director Planning Department FROM: Ramzi 1. Mansour, Dir for 14 , �j�, ("Ca � Department of Environrnen al Management DATE: September 23, 2021 SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(PL-SLU-202 1-00000 1) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(PL-REZ-2021-000006) Request: Agricultural-5 Acres (A-5a) to Neighborhood Commercial District-10,000 Square Feet(CN-10) and Single-Family-10,000 Square Feet(RS-10) Applicant: Ka`upulehu Land,LLC Tax Map Kev: 6-4-024:027 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): (X ) No comments. { } Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. { } Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. ( } Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. { ) Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawai i Organics Facility and East Hawaii Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. ( } Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. ( } Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. ( } Existing Solid Waste Management Pian is to be followed. Provide update to the department on current status. ( } Other: Planning Dept County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Exhibit Ramzi I. Mansour, Director September 23, 2021 Page 2 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following continents and/or recommendations(contact the Wastewater Division for details): { } No comments. { ) Rewire connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 2 1-5 of the Hawai`i County Code. { ) Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21- 26.1 of the Hawaii County Code. Complete Sewer Extension Application. { ) Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawaii County Code. [ ] Check or dine out as applicable: [ ] If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management ("Director of DEM"), [ ] applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require,which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. [ } Proposed activity may be subject to existing or future federal, state, or county regulation under Title 40 CFR 403.5, prohibiting discharge of certain pollutants into publicly owned treatment works. Contact the Hawai`i Department of Health for information regarding pretreatment standards. (X } Applicant shall follow Department of Health regulations. ( } Other: RM:pis w'=°`•"� Kazuo S. K. L. Todd Mitchell D. Roth vo°y�r ilii i'nr Fire Chief Lee E. Lord Eric H. Moller Managing Dirwf r ;?.: '¢• Depup,Fire Chief arr'QV a� Coutto of 'abjai`[ HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street■Suite 1501•Ililo,11awail 96720 (808)932-2900■Fax(808)932-2928 August 19, 2021 Mr.Zendo Kern, Director County of Hawai'i Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 Dear Mr. Kern, SUBJECT: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(PL-SLU-2021-040001) Request: Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application(PL-REZ 2021-000046) Request: Agricultural-5 Acres(A-5a)to Neighborhood Commercial District-10,000 Square Feet(CN-10) and Single-Family Residential-10,000 Square Feet(RS-10) Applicant: Kaupulehu Land, LLC Tax Man Keys: 64-024:027 In regards to the above-referenced subject, the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1, UNIFORM FIRE CGDE, 2006 EDITION Nate: Havrai`i Stale P ire [Fade, Nalionol 1--ire Proiection Association 2006 version, Wiih C'ountj, of Hawai`i amendments. Unruly amendments are idenlifled will? a preceding "C—"of the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature, or where special hazards exist in addition to the non-nal hazard of the occupancy. or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including,but not limited to, additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. t W41i Planning Depi. Exhibit 7 1hi14tii'i C'ofintY is au Equal Opp-laim rty Pi n,ider riml E)iipltvy n 18.1.1 Plans. 15.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to constniction. 18.1.1.2 Fire Hydrant Systems. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. C— 18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions. No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a permit from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception: Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations, hydrant testing, and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2. 18.2.2 Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Boxes). The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es) to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 15.2.2.3 Access Maintenance. The-owner or occupant of a structure or area, with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 15.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. (*may be referred as 1~DAR) 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes, parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one-and two-family dwellings or private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400fe (37 m'-) or less are 2 present, the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography, waterways,nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft(15 m)of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside that provides access to the interior of the building. Exception: 1 and 2 single-family dwellings. 18.2.3.2.1.1 NA7hen buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R,the distance in 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m) from fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft(137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, clInnatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions. C— 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. C--- 18.2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C- 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ, provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus, and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. 3 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. C-- 18.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads (25 Tons)of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shalt be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C— 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 ft(46 m) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a fire department access road, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed Toads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load Iimits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C— 18.2.3.4.6.lThe maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s) shall not exceed 10 percent. 18.2.3.4.6.2* The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft(0.3 m drop in 6 m) or the design Ilin itations of the fire apparatus of the fire department and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. 18.2,3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft{0.61 m}beyond each edge of the fire lane. 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices. The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. 4 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2,4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1,3* Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 'A�here required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. 18.2.4.2.3 Roads, trails, and other access ways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ- 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be perinitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors,barricades, chains, enclosures, signs,tags, or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed,tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner, 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 1.8.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions 5 hereof, are hereafter constructed, or moved into or within the county. When any portion of the facility or building is in excess of 150 feet(45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ. For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions, the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupancies, the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2* Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3* The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval, testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C--- 18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards. Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, 2001-3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. 6 Buildings, 3001-6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements_ Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections (FDC) to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (I y- (6) of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: 1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water,the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; 2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be as follows: a) 4"for 0900 PVC pipe; b) 4"for 0906 PE pipe; c) 3"for ductile Iron; d) 3' for galvanized steel. 3) The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall: a) be made of galvanized steel; b) have a gated valve with 2-112 inch, National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; c) be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; e) be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; f) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part,but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code. 4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC. Each FDC shall be independent of each other, with each FDC being capable of bowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus' conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. 7 5) Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFPA 25. b} The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: 1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. 2) Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road rcquirements. 3) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. 4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds greater than 2000square feet, but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 feet. 5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact Acting Battalion Chief Kyle Vares at(809--932-2913- fKA2 & K_ L. TODD Fire Chief KT:Ik Is DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y. Tsuji Ref: State Land Use Boundary Amendment(PL-SLI]-2021-000001) Request to Change from Agricultural to Urban Change of Zone Application (PL-REZ-2021-000006) Request to Chage from Agricultural-5 Acres(A-5a) to Neighborhood Commercial District-10,000 SF (CN-10) and Single-Family Residential-1.0,000 SF(RS-10) Location: 64-983 Mamalahoa Highway, Puukapu Homesteads,Waimea, District of Kohala, Island of Hawaii TMK(s): (3) 6-4-024:027 Applicant: County of Hawaii on behalf of Kaupulehu Land, LLC COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program(NFIP),Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations(44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area(liigli-risk areas), Be advised that 44CFR, Chapter 1, Subchapter B, Part 60 reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood zones subject to NFIP requirements are identified on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM). The official FIRMs can be accessed through FEMA's Map Service Center(msc.fema.gov). Our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT) could also be used to research flood hazard information. If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances,please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: o Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808) 768-8098. o Hawaii Island: County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works (808) 961-8327- • Maui/Molokai/Lanai County of Maui, Department of Planning(808)270-7139. o Kauai: County of Kauai, Department of Public Works(808)241-4849. Signed: 41 C TY S. ANG, CHIEF ENGINEER Date: Sep 8,2021 Planning Dept. Exhibit 8 _ STZA1'NE D.CASE GAIAD V.TGE yy�T ~y4ey WARD£L0.Nli�N DN-ATTCRAL RE WMCES GME CNOR OF RAWAII R 19 5 9 F � CO.CaMM1D''CN WATER RES( RZE NA.\AOE41P\T 1' r` Y y �}? ROBERT K\LASrDA O.14j pC� r {fyf, 4L KALEO MA.S[1EL !n `�.�� • ,�'C ETPUTY1DIR-C1C1R-WATER _ �h•T.r�+,cr xN,f P CI[:RI7C RESOL&CES VYAVX0 kND OCTA%KEt"110N SLN¢AU C CON'ETANNCES C MNIMJOk M WATER RE541.TRCE MAKAQL'%1F'T STATE OF HAWAII �1A WAI1 CONSER'•ATI W A YD MASTAL LANDS DEPARTML;NT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES `� "`A"`"A�GNTE �5 �°�` ` Dr1'TSIONOF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE T$T�PmumAnm 1151 PUNCHBOWL STREET,ROOM 325 KAHOGIAWI 15LAha RESEkVECD}tUlSSltli LAND HONOLULU,HAWAII 96813 WATEPARK: September 14, 2021 MEMORANDUM Log no. 3294 TO: RUSSELL Y. TSUJI, Administrator Land Division FROM: DAVID G. SMITH, Administrator Division of Forestry and Wildlife SUBJECT: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Comments on Change of Zane Application (PL-REZ-2021-000006) to change a 5-Acre Agricultural Lot to a Neighborhood Commercial District and Single Family Residential Lots at Pu`ukapu Homesteads,Waimea, Hawa'i`i The Department of Land and Natural Resources,Division of Forestry and Wildlife(DOFAW)has received your request for comment on a Change of Zone Application pertaining to changing a 5- acre agricultural lot to a 10,000 square foot neighborhood commercial district and a 10,000 square foot single-family residential lot at Pu`ukapu Homesteads, Waimea, on the island of Hawai`i, TMK: (3) 6-4-024:027. The proposed project includes subdividing the portion of the property fronting Mamalahoa Highway into three commercial lots and constructing buildings to accommodate a total 23,400 square feet of gross leasable floor area. Access to these lots will be provided by two driveways that connect to a circulatory roadway that will front Mamalahoa Highway and continue along the east and west sides of the commercial lots to a 78-stall shared parking lot located to the rear of the commercial subdivision.The remaining portion of the property (located to the rear or south of the commercial parking Iot) will be subdivided into six residential lots, each of which will contain up to two dwelling units for a total of 12 units (two dwellings already exist at the site so 10 additional units are proposed). The State listed Hawaiian Hawk or `Io (Buleo solitarius) may occur in the project vicinity. DOFAW recommends a qualified biologist survey the area to ensure no Hawaiian Hawk nests are present if trees are to be cut. `Io nests might be present during the breeding season from March to September. The State listed Blackburn's Sphinx Moth (BSM; Mandrrca blackbur-ni) has a historic range that encompasses the project area. Larvae of BSM feed on many nonnative hostplants that include tree tobacco(Nicotiana glauca)which grows in disturbed soil. We recommend contacting our Hawaii DOFAW office at (808) 974-4221 for further information about where BSM may be present and whether a vegetation survey should be conducted to determine the presence of plants preferred by BSM.To avoid lharnh to BSM,DOFAW recommends removing plants less than one meter in height or during the dry time of the year. If you remove tree tobacco over one meter in height or disturb Planning Dept. Exhibit -- 9 the ground around or within several meters of these plants they must be checked thoroughly for the presence of eggs and larvae. The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat or `Ope`ape`a (Lasiurus cinereas semotrrs)could potentially to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. Any site clearing that is required should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). During this period, no woody plants greater than 15 feet (4.6 meters) tall should be disturbed, removed, or trimmed. The State listed Hawaiian Goose or Nene(Bi-auto sandvicensis) may also potentially occur in the vicinity of the proposed project site. It is against State law to harm or harass this species. If this species is present during construction activities, all activities within 100 feet (30 meters) should cease, and the bird should not be approached. Work may continue after the bird leaves the area of its own accord. If a nest is discovered at any point, please contact the Hawaii DOFAW Office at (808)974-4221. Artificial fighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night by causing them to become disoriented. This disorientation can result in collision with manmade strictures or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that might be required, DOFAW recommends that afl lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should additionally be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young,newly fledged seabirds take their initial flight to the open ocean. For illustrations and ,guidance related to seabird-friendly fighting styles that also protect the starry night skies of Hawaii please visit:littps:Hdliir.hawaii.2ov/wildlifelfiles/2016/03/ DOC439.pdf. To prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death (ROD), if `611i`a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: haps:Ilcros.ctahr.11awaii.edulrod. DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites,such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens(e.g.,Rapid'Ohi`a Death), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at(808) 933-3340 in planning, design, and construction of the project to lean of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Gear that may contain soil,such as work boats and vehicles,should be thoroughly cleaned with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death and other harmful fungal pathogens. DO FA W recommends using native plant species for landscaping that are appropriate for the area (i.e.climate conditions are suitable for the plants to thrive,historically occurred there,etc.). Please do not plant invasive species. DOFAW recommends consulting the Hawaii-Pacific Weed Risk Assessment website to determine the potential invasiveness of plants proposed for use in the project (https://sites.google.coin/site/weedr'skassessnient/honie). We recommend that you refer to www.plaritpono.org for guidance on sefection and evaluation for landscaping plants. We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. Should the scope of the project change significantly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted, please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact Paul Radley, Protected Species Habitat Conservation Planning Coordinator at (808) 295-1123 or 12aul.m.radley cr hawaii.gov. Sincerely, OOA DAVID G. SMITH Administrator ro+ SUZANNE D.CASE A F N CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y.IGE 't f.e "q}L tiBOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES GOVERNOR OF HAWAII COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT e ROBERT K NIASUDA YFIRST DEPUTY p5 adV Ni K4LE0 MANUEL dV DEPUTY DIRECTOR-WATER ❑ �' d'` ° AQUATICRESOURCES BOATINGANDOC£ANRECREATION BUREAU OF CONT ANCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS STATE OF HAWAII CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT ENGINEERING FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE t�teofwz y DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES RAHOOLAWE°RIC D�SRVATIONMIs.SION LAND STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION STATE PARKS KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING 601 KAMOKILA BLVD,STE 555 KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 October 12,2021 IN REPLY REFER TO: Zendo Kern,Director Project No.2021PROI158 County of Hawaii,Planning Department Doc.No. 2110SN02 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Archaeology Hilo,HI 96720 planning@hawaiicounty.gov Dear Mr.Kern: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review State Land Use Boundary Amendment Petition Change of Zone Application Agricultural(A-5a)to Neighborhood Commercial(CN-10)and Single-Family Residential(RS-10) Pu`ukapu Ahupua`a,South Kohala District,Island of Hawaii TNIK: (3)6-4-024:027 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the request by Carlsmith Ball LLP (attorney),on behalf of the Ka`upulehu Land,LLC(applicant), for the County to amend an existing State Land Use Boundary (Agricultural District to Urban District) and a Change of Zone (Agricultural [A-5a] to Neighborhood Commercial [CN-10] and Single-Family Residential [RS-10]). SHPD received this submittal on September 17, 2021. The project area consists of the 5.349-acre parcel. The proposed Pu`ukapu Place project will involve construction of three commercial lots fronting Mamalahoa Highway, and six residential lots; two of the lots have existing farm dwellings. SHPD previously indicated no archaeological inventory survey had been completed for the project area and that no historic properties had been documented nearby (August 30, 2017; Log No. 2017.00897, Doc. No. 1708AR19). SHPD reviewed zone change applications for Parcel 027 and stated that the potential to impact significant historic properties is unlikely due to prior extensive land alteration associated with modern small farming (January 8, 1990 Memorandum: February 12, 1990, File No. 90-373, Doc. No. 7433E). SHPD has also indicated that Parcel 027 is "outside the area known to contain segments of the Waimea Field System which comprises significant agricultural features" (September 2, 1992;Log No. 6065,Doc. No. 0296x).Lastly, aerial photographs indicate that the proposed project area was graded during its use as farmland. No new information has been provided to alter the previous review determination of no historic properties affected. Based on the information provided,the SHPD has no objections to the proposed boundary amendments and change of zone application. Please contact Sean Naleimaile at(808)933-7651 or at sean.p.naleimaileghawaii.gov for any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Aloha,1,09e D�bi/eg/- Alan S.Downer,PhD Administrator, State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc: Jessica Andrews,Jessica.andrewskhawaiicount�gov Planning Dept. CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAx 808.935.7975 W W W.CARLSMITH.COM KGARSON@CAR I SMITH.COM November 8, 2021 Mr. Zendo Kern Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Jessica Andrews Re: Applicant: Kaupulehu Land LLC Application: State Land Use Boundary Amendment Petition (PL-SLU-2021-000001) and Change of Zone Application (PL-REZ-2021-000006) at Kamuela, Puukapu Homestead, District of South Kohala, Hawaii Tax Map Key No.: (3) 6-4-024:027 1"Project") Dear Mr. Kern: This letter is in response to the comments received from the Hawaii County Department of Public Works, Engineering Division (DPW) and State Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) with respect to the above-referenced applications. 1. DPW: The Applicant will comply with all applicable DPW requirements. Applicant understands that access to Mamalahoa Highway, including the provision of adequate sight distances, shall meet with the approval of the DPW. The Applicant has prepared a TIAR, a copy of which your Department transmitted to DPW, Traffic Division. All construction activities will comply with HCC, Chapter 27 (Flood Plain Management), and a Drainage Report will be submitted to DPW Engineering for approval as part of the Plan Approval application process. 2. DOFAW: The Applicant acknowledges DOFAW's colmilents relating to possible habits near the Project vicinity or within the historic range for the Hawaiian Hawk or I'o, Blackburn's Sphinx Moth (BSM; Manchuca blackburn), Hawaiian Hoary Bat or 'Ope'ape'a (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) or Hawaiian Goose or Nene HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI Planning Depi. Exhibit 11 Planning Department November 8, 2021 Page 2 (Branta sandvicensis), the impacts of artificial lighting, and the prevention of the spread of Rapid Ohia Death, and will take necessary precautions during any earth moving and/or tree trimming activities on the Property. The Project will comply with the outdoor lighting requirements of Article 9 of Chapter 14, HCC. Thank you for your consideration. Very Truly Yours, Katherine A. Garson KAG:KYL xc: Client Department of Public Works, Engineering Division State DLNR, Division of Forestry and Wildlife 4864-9060-2754.1 Mori, Ashley From: Kern,Zendo Sent: Monday, September 27, 2021 7:47 AM To: Mori, Ashley Subject: FW: rezoning Please intake. Thanks! Z From: Carlene Wilson<wilsc006@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 23, 20212:09 PM To: Kern,Zendo<Zendo.Kern@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: rezoning Aloha Mr. Kern, I am writing to ask you to oppose the application for rezoning and land use for 64-983 Mamalahoa Hwy. Waimea doesn't need anymore commercial developmentjust so that we can lose the peace and quiet of country life. Mr. Meztler plans to build three commercial buildings and sell four residential lots. I'm sure these residential lots will be too expensive for any local person to afford. Also, Mamalahoa Hwy doesn't need anymore congestion. We live a few hundred feet from the proposed development and sometimes it can be difficult trying to turn onto the highway. PLEASE reject the application for rezoning. Thank you. Carlene Wilson Planning Depi. Exhibit 1.2 Mori, Ashley From: Kern, Zendo Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 12:54 PM To: Mori, Ashley Subject: FW: Pu'ukapu Place Master Plan 64-983 Mamalahoa Hwy. Hi Ashley, Please intake. Thanks! Zendo From: Ekela Kahuanui <ekahuanui@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 05, 202110:30 AM Subject: Pu'ukapu Place Master Plan 64-983 Mamalahoa Hwy. Aloha mai, Waimea is my home and over the years we've seen an increase in development for the sake of developing and increasing the wealth of the few.This newest proposal is another example of this vicious cycle. The development is not needed.The infrastructure is not sufficient for the increased traffic this development could bring.The community does not need to reward Mr Metzler with a commercial rezoning of a property which he rezoned to Ag back in 2002 so he can now develop his property in an over developed community. Mahalo for your consideration. N a'u, 'Ekela Kahuanui Planning Depx. 1 Exhibit 13