My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-10-27 EMC minutes draft
PublicDocuments
>
Environmental Management
>
Environmental Management Commission
>
Agendas
>
2020-2024
>
2021
>
2021-11-24
>
2021-10-27 EMC minutes draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2021 2:57:54 PM
Creation date
11/15/2021 2:57:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
through Real Property Tax revenue. We have some revenue coming in on tipping fees, but <br />that’s only on commercial entities. Recycling gets a piddle. Even though there is a CIP list of <br />more than $1 billion of projects that need to be done, that money doesn’t happen <br />automatically. It needs to be funded and is subject to the political winds of the time. So where <br />we are leaning was to think not only of wastewater as an enterprise fund, but also solid waste <br />management, which is basically treating this as a business with fees for service to manage our <br />solid waste, with the preferable goal of keeping it out of the landfill, and certainly out of our <br />land and water if we can. We all recall what an enterprise fund is. What she wrote in her paper <br />are the different ways that an enterprise fund would look at how do we get more money. She <br />added that the amount of money that is necessary for solid waste is peanuts next to what we <br />need to manage wastewater, but nevertheless it is important to the community and to our <br />‘ina. <br /> <br />Tipping fees. Wehave been upping the amountfor tippingfees at the landfill 2 percent a year, <br />4 <br />and another range of increases is going to have to come and be approvedby Counciland <br />hopefully we will hear some discussion about the residential hauler credit that was previously <br />removed–i.e., if you were acommercial haulerand you were taking residential waste, you <br />didn’t have to pay a tipping fee. That got reversed, squawks were made, and now DEM is <br />looking at reinstating that credit. But it’s a chunk of change that could be brought to bear to <br />costs. Another thing is looking at increased fees for special waste, not the humdrum stuff but <br />the things that need special handling and special concentration and control,or to penalize <br />people who are dumpinginto the landfill things that could be recycled. A point that Ramzi <br />made at the Council meetings he has been at recently is that the tipping fees were not built to <br />increase with inflation. And so we could make sure that that gets worked in. <br /> <br />Pay As You Throw was brought up in the Solid Waste Advisory Committee and was not selected <br />as a high prioritybut was in there as a recommendation to look at. And if people are interested, <br />she could provide more information to that. Basically, it’s incenting people to reduce the <br />amount of waste they are putting in the landfill, and increasing their recyclables, because there <br />is a real price differential. It’s going to cost you more if you are just throwing it away as trash, as <br />opposed to recycling it. Better yet, you don’t make it in the first place. It has some initial <br />challenges to make sure there is good communication and enforcement about putting the right <br />things in the right bags or containers. It would involve ideally having some curbside pickup <br />available. So, there are things to do to make sure that we can incent people to do the right <br />thing, reducing waste, through a PAYT program. It has been successful in other areas, including <br />other rural areas. We are paying right now through Real Property Tax. It is a percent, it’s <br />hidden, nobody really thinks about itor recognizes that you have to pay for solid waste. One <br />recommendation from ISWMPwas to drawitout as a line item what we are payingfor waste, <br />and unfortunately increase that line item. <br /> <br />4 <br /> Ordinance No. 2020-86 removed the Council’s role in raising the tipping fees and placed the fee <br />schedule in the administrative rules. This ordinance added HCC Section 20-04-04: “Fees for <br />management of materials entering into a SWD facility and any State solid waste surcharge shall be <br />established by the department pursuant to department rules.” <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.