My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-04 Windward Exh B (Public Testimony re SPP 12-138)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-11-04 Windward Exh B (Public Testimony re SPP 12-138)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2021 6:29:14 AM
Creation date
12/3/2021 6:29:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
know where that came from. If you're saying that is not a box and we're not checking that we're <br /> looking at other criteria then respectfully I understand. <br /> KEKAL I can't speak to what the specific Commissioner meant if you know who— <br /> TURNER: It was three, it was several. <br /> KEKAL Okay, well, if you know which ones did it then that's great. <br /> TURNER: I'm sorry. I didn't mean to interrupt. <br /> KEKAL No, it's okay. I can't tell you what they meant by saying it. All I can say is that <br /> everybody's testimonials is taken into consideration when the Commission makes a decision, <br /> and you would have to ask the specific Commissioner what they meant when they stated that <br /> statement. <br /> TURNER: Right and that's why I'm here. It was mentioned at least three times. I don't have <br /> the transcripts in front of me. I remember Mr. Au used that phrasing, Mr. Lin used that phrasing <br /> and I believe the Chairman used that phrasing. I believe others when they voted for it <br /> acknowledged that phrasing. Whether there was a meeting that I missed, where all the <br /> community came out and said we're in favor of this I respectfully would understand, but the <br /> community came out and literally hired lawyers put signs in their yards. I left the meeting <br /> thinking what else could we have done to get that box checked or unchecked and I feel like either <br /> procedurally the box wasn't on the sheet, which it sounds like it should have been or could have <br /> been. I'm just questioning whether the Commission genuinely saw that as a checkbox or just put <br /> it much lower on the list. It's frustrating, I'm sorry, it's my backyard literally and I feel like we <br /> were encouraged to come to a meeting like this and say hey this is going on in our backyard. <br /> And at the same time pivoting and saying, maybe that isn't that important. Sorry I'll stop <br /> talking. <br /> REPLOGLE: No, if you're finished that's fine, but if you have something to say. <br /> TURNER: I think my last, I hope that as a member of this Commission, when you're imagining <br /> these projects and you're imagining somebody without the power to vote and that you're <br /> imagining these projects in your own backyards. That each of you, when you voted yes, <br /> functionally are saying yes, I would vote for that project in my backyard against my tree line. <br /> And if you're not respectfully I don't know that you're really considering the neighborhood's <br /> position on this. I just like to close by saying, as an educator I just wish they'd find a location <br /> where the community embrace the project, because this is not that at all I'm sorry respectfully. <br /> REPLOGLE: I would say Mr. Turner from my standpoint and in regard to your check boxes. I <br /> never looked at anything as checked boxes, but I looked at what the Planning Director passed <br /> forward to us with recommendations and all the things that the school or the applicant whether <br /> it's a school or whatever, that the applicant presented to the Planning Director they met all those <br /> standards, and you could I guess call them checked boxes. But you are right, the Planning <br /> Director does not have the benefit at that time of public testimony, and we do. I hear what <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.