2021-11-04 Windward Exh C PD Initiated Chaqueaux 159 Kalanikoa REZ 97-004 PL-PDI-21-001

Home

Parcel 104 that has the self-storage facility with the other uses, Parcel 103 is here, and it is the former location of most recently E Komo Mai Lounge. The other parcels are vacant of any improvements. Here's some views of the subject properties again this is Parcel 104 from Kalanikoa Street showing the existing self-storage facility, the furniture repair shop is here, and then the base yard for ambulances and upper right are views from the other parcels from Kalanikoa Street. Lower left are views of the parcels from the intersection of Kuawa and Kalanikoa and then the lower right is a view of the parcels from Kuawa Street. Oops, wrong slide forgot to take that one out. With all that said, the Director is recommending that the Commission forward a favorable recommendation to the County Council to repeal Ordinance 97 106. With that I'd like to turn the time back over to the Chair, thank you for your time. REPLOGLE: Thank you, Christian. We will now hear from Ronald Kim Esq., Agent for the Applicant. Please raise your right hand. So, I can swear you in. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the Windward Planning Commission? KIM: Yes, I do. REPLOGLE: Please state your name and the town you live in, and have you received the background and recommendation from the Planning Department? KIM: Good morning, Chairperson. Ronald Kim, I live in Hilo and yes, I have received the background report and recommendations from the Planning Department, thank you. REPLOGLE: Okay, do you agree with the Planning Director's recommendations including proposed conditions? KIM: Yes, we do yes. REPLOGLE: Please go ahead with your presentation. KIM: Okay, we have very little to add actually to what the Planning Department already did. The Planning Department did a really good job of explaining the background and situation. And what the plan is for the property, what the difference is between the two zoning designations. Where it's really sort of a distinction without a difference as far as Chaqueaux and their neighbor goes, because both of their uses would be allowed under either Limited Industrial or the Mixed Commercial Industrial Use. So, it really does seem like a logical step, and it does put us in compliance with the law to allow Chaqueaux to go forward with getting plan approval, if we revert those zoning back to the initial Limited Industrial. We're happy to respond to any questions you might have about the property or Chaqueaux. REPLOGLE: Thank you, Mr. Kim. Commissioners do you have any questions for the staff or the applicant? Mr. Clarkson? CLARKSON: Yes, I have a question for the staff. The difference in zoning between the two, as far as, I mean there were literally dozens of uses approved for each zoning designation and I didn't go through them one by one. But I wanted to ask the Planning Department staff whether 3 EXHIBIT C