My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-04 Windward Exh E ConnectionsCBESS SPP12-138
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-11-04 Windward Exh E ConnectionsCBESS SPP12-138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2021 6:36:03 AM
Creation date
12/3/2021 6:35:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Before I do it again, I would just like some clarity because there seems to be a <br /> procedural disagreement between Mr. Kay and our Counsel as to how this should be done. <br /> Counsel Kekai has said that the motion to amend has to be— <br /> KEKAL Mines is more a logistical thing Chair I mean Commissioner Clarkson. I'm saying, if <br /> you guys are going to make multiple amendments, I would like them to be all in one motion. <br /> Instead of continually making a motion to amend the original motion to amend the original so if <br /> there's other amendments that need to be made at this point like if you're going to adopt the <br /> applicant's suggestion to change the typo. Then put that in here or anything else, or if it's just <br /> including just Number 66 and the Commission is satisfied with that, then we can act on the <br /> second motion first. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> CLARKSON: I have no interest in making a motion regarding the typo. I only have an interest <br /> in the Finding of Fact 66 and will not be proposing or moving any further amendments. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, why don't you make your official amendment, and we'll get a second or at <br /> least state what you said earlier, so we can go on. Mr. Lin already seconded what you said but I <br /> want everybody to know what you said before we go on. <br /> CLARKSON: I want to amend the original motion that was made by Commissioner Galimba <br /> which was for approval of the Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Laws, and Decision and Order to <br /> substitute applicants proposed language which I don't want to have to repeat because I don't <br /> have it in front of me, but I know the gist of it for Finding of Fact 66 related to public trust. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. <br /> CLARKSON: That was my motion. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you and Mr. Lin seconded it. <br /> LIN: I stand with my second. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. Again,just to be safe is there any more discussion on that? <br /> Okay, Mr. Kay would you do a roll call on that amendment and then we go to Ms. Galimba's <br /> motion correct? <br /> KAY: That's correct. Okay, thank you. Commissioner Clarkson? <br /> CLARKSON: Aye. <br /> KAY: Commissioner Lin? <br /> LIN: Aye. <br /> ll <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.