My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-11-04 Windward Exh E ConnectionsCBESS SPP12-138
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2021
>
2021-11-04 Windward Exh E ConnectionsCBESS SPP12-138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2021 6:36:03 AM
Creation date
12/3/2021 6:35:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CAMPBELL: Good afternoon, everybody Jean Campbell Deputy Planning Director, I'm sorry <br /> Deputy Corporation Counsel and with me is Deputy Planning Director Jeffrey Darrow. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. I'm going to swear you all in together,please raise your right <br /> hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth, on this matter now before the Windward Planning <br /> Commission? <br /> PARTIES: Yes, I do. <br /> REPLOGLE: Okay. Applicants, we have received your proposed amendments to the draft <br /> Findings, do you have anything further to add? <br /> HONG: Yes, Mr. Chairman, two more things. <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Hong? <br /> HONG: Thank you, on behalf of CBESS I just note that on the draft proposed Findings at Page <br /> 16, paragraph F, F as in Frank on one, two, third line on the right-hand side, the word come, c-o- <br /> m-e appears that's a typo should be "some"with a"s". Other than that, you have our proposals <br /> and certainly, the first amendment that we submitted is to reflect the current status of the school, <br /> and the second regarding the Kauai Springs case. We're certainly not married to that, I <br /> appreciate the Commission's language and so we're not pushing that particular issue. Then the <br /> second thing I wanted to bring up was, I believe that Mr. Thatcher wanted to make a comment as <br /> well. <br /> REPLOGLE: Mr. Thatcher is this true? <br /> THATCHER: Yes, if I could, thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Please go ahead. <br /> THATCHER: I just want to request that I not be questioned about the personal attacks by Mr. <br /> Gomes on my family before I can consult with an attorney. <br /> REPLOGLE: Of course. <br /> HONG: And so, I want to thank the Commission and certainly Corporation Counsel putting this <br /> very comprehensive proposed Findings. We'd be happy to answer any questions that the <br /> Commission may have in that, thank you. <br /> REPLOGLE: Thank you. Is there anyone else for the applicant? Okay, and the Intervenor Mr. <br /> Matsukawa, do you have, do you wish to speak on anything? <br /> MATSUKAWA: Yes, I'll be brief. We filed exceptions and I trust that the Commission <br /> members read the exceptions, as well as the record on appeal. What I think it's important to note <br /> is that by State law when Commission members have not heard the original testimony or <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.