Laserfiche WebLink
Phala community large capacity cesspool closure project. Since you have not been privy to <br />this, I would like to read to you the important section. On July 23, 2021, the County – I am <br />quoting from the notice –submitted a design package that included wastewater treatment <br />design/build documents in a letter detailing the County’s desire to construct a wastewater <br />treatment plant that includes a mechanical secondary treatment process. Based on review of <br />the information presented in the County’s design package, EPA has determined that the County <br />has failed to fully comply with the requirements of paragraph (f) of the AOC because the <br />Health. The County’s failure to comply with all applicable requirements of paragraph (f) is a <br />violation of the AOC. Pursuant to subsection (e) of the AOC, EPA may, at its discretion, assess <br />stipulated penalties for an unexcused delay in complying with any provision of the AOC. EPA <br />may also elect to pursue judicial remedies to enforce the AOC. According to the AOC, in Section <br />(e), 43a, they start with $150 per day per violation for the first to the thirtieth day. That moves <br />to $300 per day for the violation to the sixtieth day. And now here we are at sixty-plus days at <br />$500-plus per day, so that now the County is on the hook for $15,000 per month, while <br />receiving only $2,242 at most from those who are currently on the Phala LCC. So, the <br />payments they are receiving from Phala are not going to cover this $15,000 a month that we <br />are on the hook for. The County agreed to pay these stipulated penalties if they did not do the <br />actions that were in the AOC. I am very concerned as a taxpayer and as a citizen in this County <br />that in fact we are on the hook for an unknown amount of penalties. Plus, we are on the hook <br />for further judicial action. So therefore, I am asking, please find out how much this is going to <br />cost us, because this is a running taxi meter, basically. And the County agreed they were going <br />to pay this if they didn’t do what they were supposed to do. Now they have been sent this <br />letter notifying them of the fact that they can demand payment at any moment. So, I would <br />hope that the Commissioners would be interested in how much this is going to cost us. So, <br />thank you very much. <br /> <br />Roy Kadotaand Michelle Mitsumori from Mr. K’s Recycle & Redemption Center deferred their <br />comments(see pages 4-7 and 8-9). <br />Rick Bennett also deferred his comments (see pages 18-20). <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />a. Status report on 2021 EMC Priorities – Each lead commissioner to provide brief report on <br />assigned priorities (priorities are listed in the May 2021 meeting minutes). <br />Chair Adams said she has joined with Recycling Specialist Sanne Berrig to work on the LifeCycle <br />Assessment project, which is now under way. An update on the project will come in the <br />October or November meeting. <br />See also agenda item 7-b (Pages 18-21) for Vice Chair Gaffney’s priority project. <br />b. Continued discussion of solid waste division funding needs and options. <br />Chair Adams asked whether the Commission was ready to make specific recommendations <br />around extended producer responsibility. Are there priority programs we would like to <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />