Laserfiche WebLink
DOMINGO: Yes. You know, when you cut the number of stated residential lots <br />practically into half, that certainly has an impact on a project. And when you mentioned, you <br />know, with regards to the possibility of having a channelization of the highway and other <br />conditions you’re changing the ordinance.You know, you’re changing the ordinance. I’m <br />totally against this. You know, this makes a project unfeasible. <br />TORIGOE: Well, Commissioner Domingo, it’s just a draft for discussion. <br />DOMINGO: Well, I’m just making my feelings known -. <br />TORIGOE: Right. <br />DOMINGO: That should this come up as written then I’ll surely fight against this. I <br />mean if we’re going to consider an extension of time, let’s consider extension of time. And I <br />don’t think it would be proper for us to go into the rezoning bill and change what was in there <br />already to begin with and what was approved by the ordinance. <br />TORIGOE: Well, I think all that’s being attempted is to stimulate some discussion that <br />may lead to an amicable solution; and I think a number of you, including yourself, <br />Commissioner Domingo, have noted the preferability of having some kind of a win-win; and I <br />think this is trying to go in that direction. And that’s all it is at this point. <br />WATANABE: To comment, Mr. Domingo, it’s kind of like what I expected to occur if <br />we were compro -, you know, when we asked them to find some compromise with -. <br />DOMINGO: You know, in deference to you, Mr. Chairman, with the ordinance going <br />up with the negative recommendation there is no indication as to whether the Council will go <br />along with the recommendation to deny or to approve, to override the Commission’s denial and <br />approve the rezoning, you know. When you consider the mood and the, the mood of the <br />Council, you know, the applicant will have a hard time even to have them consider rezoning, go <br />through the rezoning. And when you have people who go to the Commission and say that we <br />have here an issue which has been brought up many years ago, over ten years ago, with regards <br />to the preservation of the ocean front and with no further development along the shoreline, tell <br />me how those Council people will react to it? <br />You know, I cannot accept this as written. If we’re going to consider an extension, let’s consider <br />the extension and leave the ordinance as is. That’s it. And if we, and then when we consider the <br />SMA Permit, you know, then we can deal with the finer things of the project. The zoning is <br />broad right now as written. The zoning is broad. But when you come down to the SMA Permit, <br />it brings into a more finer detail and it’s confined within a smaller area, a developable area, in <br />which we can consider all impacts. But that’s written, you know. <br />WATANABE: Okay. And that’s fine. You have a right to an opinion. As I stated earlier <br />we are not able to discuss the SMA requirements; and I did not think that we could gain any <br />EXHIBIT D <br />12 <br /> <br />