Laserfiche WebLink
DOMINGO: No, no. I’m not concerned about that was approved. I’m concerned if that <br />would be agendized for that meeting because we had not officially approved that and included <br />that as an agenda for today’s meeting. <br />WATANABE: Well, Mr. Lim is going to come up with some suggested stuff, yeah. <br />DOMINGO: Only because we submitted for the Commission’s consideration. He had <br />no choice but to say give me some time so I can go back to my clients and see whether or not <br />they would accept or they have any amendments to it. That’s how I understand it. <br />WATANABE: Well, he’s perfectly capable of coming up and saying I want to stick with <br />the 50 and bring that up and all I want to do is just the time extension. And if he gets the votes, <br />he gets the votes. That’s fine. <br />DOMINGO: Well, you know, technically we had not approved or accepted that <br />recommendation as part of today’s agenda for us to effectuate any legal, legal avenue to which <br />we can consider that in the next meeting. That’s what I’m saying. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman, if I might -. <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />WOODARD: I think, Commissioner Domingo, that these were just talking points. <br />These were ideas that might help come to a change in the applicant’s proposal that perhaps the <br />Commission can agree on; but it’s up to them. These are not things we can dictate to them. <br />These are things they have to look over, see if they can revise their proposal to a point that the <br />Commission can come up with an approval. So these are really talking points not -. <br />DOMINGO: Yeah. I appreciate that, Mr. Woodward. It’s talking points. But when we <br />surface it and give it to the applicant for its consideration we are in essence saying consider this <br />as amendment to the zoning bill. Now his presentation at the next meeting would be based on <br />what’s in that recommendation. And what I’m saying is that to begin with in the very beginning, <br />is that within the purview of a recommendation for extension of time? Can we go through the <br />whole ordinance and pick and choose what we want to change? <br />WATANABE: Mr. Director? <br />YUEN: Yeah, I understand, I -. <br />DOMINGO: In fact, can we amend, can we amend the ordinance? I think I heard <br />earlier part of the day that we cannot amend the ordinance. <br />YUEN: Well, I think you cannot, you can’t introduce an entirely new bill. For <br />example, the Commission cannot introduce an ordinance to rezone the property to A-1a. All <br />right? But I understand exactly what you’re saying about agendizing an item and there’s an <br />application in. We receive an application, it’s strictly an application for a time extension <br />EXHIBIT D <br />22 <br /> <br />