2008-01-11 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

developer to develop what he had originally that you found a, I would say, a very fair median ground to best sort of represent the Council (sic) as a whole. And I commend you on what you’ve come up with content-wise on that. So I’m just wondering if there’s any way, given that we’ve followed what Commissioner Woodward suggested we’re sort of likely to do, that this document which is not agendized in any way could sort of just kind of go along to the Council in some fashion just for their consideration. I don’t know -. WATANABE: Well, I’m wondering if we could discuss this to some degree because I agree I don’t think we have the votes either way on this issue either; and maybe then the record will reflect where we were headed. And my only question to Mr. Lim was whether he would th choose to continue this to the March 20, or he’d want to work on it right now. He’s kind of in a quandary in that he hasn’t had the opportunity to discuss it with this client. On the other hand I didn’t feel I had the liberty to share it with anyone else until we discussed Agenda Item 4 first. I mean it’s not up to me. You know, it’s really a Commission kind of issue. So with that, you know, I assume, Mr. Lim, that you still want to send this up to the Council at the same time as the negative recommendation for Agenda Item 4. And I suppose if we discussed this to some degree it will then in effect be entered into the record. WOODWARD: If I might suggest, Mr. Chairman, maybe we can ask Mr. Torigoe what the best way to handle this would be. Because really this is either a revision or an unagendized item, depending on how you look at it; and I’d like to get his input as to what the best way to proceed would be, just take a vote on the issue that’s before us or rehash this whole thing. TORIGOE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Well, there’s a couple of things you can do. Taking one step back, one thing you could do is you’ve attempted to take a vote on Item No. 4 which did not pass and the vote today seemed to indicate that you wouldn’t be able to get a vote with five either way. And so it looks like that’s going up with a default negative along with the entire record and all of the good discussion that you had on the record. You could let that go up but also with a notation that there is a complementary Item No. 5 that asks for an amendment to extend, an amendment to this Condition C to obtain, secure final subdivision approval, just to let the Council know that, you know, there’s something else coming up that is the flip side of 4, so that they would not prejudge the matter I think as probably Mr. Lim and his client are concerned about. That’s one way to handle it. And then you can continue this Item No. 5 to allow Mr. Lim and his client to discuss it and you all to take a better look at it, to look at the recommendation that the Chairman has created. WATANABE: I apologize. I should have put “Draft” on there. I think I made it clear that was my intent. Yeah? TORIGOE: Okay. So -. WATANABE: So then what you’re saying then is we could put, place a caveat that Agenda Item 5 has been continued, say to the February meeting, at which point Mr. Lim would have had a chance to consult with his client and also the other Commissioners would have had a chance to digest the material. And then we could agendize this for them and then send it up, subsequent to sending up Agenda Item 4, cause Agenda Item 4 is going up, irrespective. EXHIBIT D 4