2008-01-11 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.b. go up to the County Council that you add a caveat that you are, that something else is coming so, you know, you would like them to review those together. WATANABE: Okay. With that, Mr. Torigoe, earlier you indicated that this could be, if labeled as a draft, be presented as a discussion item; and I think the minutes would clearly indicate that we haven’t approved it, it was continued. And I’m wondering if that can occur. Do you feel comfortable with that occurring? Cause they will know that we haven’t approved, we haven’t acted on it, obviously, cause we’ve continued. Or if we should just, as you suggested earlier, place, you know, a simple caveat that we are currently, we have continued Item 5 and we’re working on revised conditions to Item 5. For me I don’t particularly care how we handle it as long as, you know, we’re abiding by the rules. Mr. Director, you have some comments? YUEN: You know, we can certainly put a note, a sentence or two in the letter that we forward the recommendation on 4.a. and 4.b., we can include a statement that the applicant has a request for a time extension that is still pending at the Planning Commission and it would be expected to come to the Council shortly. LIM: We would ask that the Commission indicate your request that the matters be heard together at the County Council. I mean what I’m trying to accomplish is the -. WATANABE: Well, in a round-about way I know what you’re trying to accomplish. On the other hand, you know, I’m trying to be fair too. Okay? So, you know, I think if the record is clear that there’s further discussion, they will, let’s leave it up to them to come to that conclusion. LIM: Hopefully, yeah, what my -. WATANABE: Otherwise, you know, then I have to show respect for the Director also, right? LIM: What I’d like to do is submit comments to this proposal; and that’s why I need the extra time. WATANABE: No, that’s fine. For your information, Mr. Lim, you know, I would refer to the, there was a flood study or something about the shoreline and I believe the elevations there up to 140 feet from the shoreline was about 25 feet; and so if you refer to your own exhibits in there, it’s generally not recommended that you build that close to the shoreline anyway. So it may not really represent a taking. I don’t think the 20-foot setback that we’re talking about is consistent with the Belt Collins setback which is, I believe, adjoining this parcel. And, you know, most of the rest of the conditions you had previously agreed to, with the exception of the height limitations on the house. LIM: Can I ask some clarifying questions so that when I -? WATANABE: Sure. EXHIBIT D 6