2008-01-11 TPDKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WATANABE: Well, I understand that, Mr. Lim; but on the other hand I think you would rightfully be leery of initiating that, not knowing whether it would pass or not. So if you would allow us, you know, maybe we can work this out as best we can. It doesn’t appear as though we have the votes. So it seems like we’re going to punt anyway on Item 4 anyhow; and then we can discuss this further when we discuss Agenda Item 5, which would be yours. And at that time, like I pointed out earlier, the applicant has the, there’s no argument about that, the applicant has the right to extend the time; and we could do this in conjunction with the SMA Permit. However, I would encourage us to, you know, entertain further discussions today so at least when Agenda Item 4 goes up there’s a little more documentation as to where this body might be headed or leaning and why? And so maybe that would be -. I’m not suggesting that you, I appreciate your volunteering that, but I’m not suggesting that you needed to initiate any change of zone. Would you, Shelly, share with us your feelings? OGATA: No, no, at this point in time based on what I’ve heard thus far I’m not inclined to agree with the Director’s position. So -. WATANABE: Okay. Well, we’ve heard from all of the Commissioners and we heard from the applicant’s representative and the Planning Director.I would entertain a motion. I don’t suspect that motion would carry, but at least that way we could, you know, put it to bed and we’ll, you know, we’ll have to send it up as whatever turns out turns out. So I’d entertain a motion at this point. DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? WATANABE: Yes. DOMINGO: Regarding Planning Director’s initiative, Rezoning No. 07-000067/REZ 866, with the initiation of a change of zone for 37.88 acres of land from a Single-Family Residential 15,000-square foot (RS-15) to a Residential and Agricultural 5-acre (RA-5a) district, I move that we send an unfavorable recommendation to the County Council. WATANABE: Is there a second to that motion? WOODWARD: Second. WATANABE: Okay, it has been moved and seconded; and I believe we’ve all kind of expressed our views on this. So I doubt that any further discussion is needed. Mr. Darrow? DARROW: For clarification, we are on Agenda Item No. 4. Agenda Item No. 4 has two items. Is this for both items? WATANABE: Oh, very good. Mr. Domingo, you’re in reference to both items meaning No. 4.a. and No. 4.b.? Because No. 4.b. it references the repeal of the Ordinance 97-102 which we-. It’s one in the same really. EXHIBIT C 21