Laserfiche WebLink
to me is the County is being stiffed out of this fee that should been paid in ‘97 and it should not <br />be stiffed. <br />GRAHAM: Did you want anything further from Mr. Lim on that? <br />IWASHITA: Oh, no. I think that’s just my response, you know, to basically, the <br />acknowledgment that Clark Realty knows now and maybe even before it bought this property <br />that the payment hadn’t been made. <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I’m not sure if I should make the motion first as you had recommended <br />and we follow it by follow-up comments with Mr. Iwashita -. <br />GRAHAM: We’re really not at the point in the hearing. We still have the applicant <br />before us and we’re just asking questions of the applicant. <br />WATANABE: Well, I, okay. Then it may be a little bit out of order but my comment is <br />this: Okay, in the event that the former owner who originally had the entitlement given to them <br />had paid the water commitment, had developed the property, Clark Realty today having bought <br />that property with an existing building would not be required to pay an additional water <br />commitment. They would just be coming in here for a zoning change because the uses are not <br />permitted within that particular zoning. And to a degree it would seem to me that the zoning <br />change they’re requesting is kind of like a step down from what the current zoning is, assuming, <br />you know, they’ve followed up with all of their commitments. So I just don’t see where the <br />County is getting stiffed. <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes, I was just reading the comment on this application from the <br />Department of Water Supply and there is no mention of a previous water commitment that the <br />Department feels is due to them. If they had built something and were using water and hadn’t <br />paid for it, I could see that as an issue. But since they never did do the construction and never <br />submitted the data, the water use calculations that were requested, it seems to me that Mr. Lim’s <br />client can just go ahead and do it now based on what they’re going to be building, and make the <br />appropriate submittals to the Water Department, and let them calculate it out. It’s their own <br />kuleana to protect their own interests. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, thank you. Mr. Lim, you have anything further? <br />LIM: I guess the last comment we have on this issue is even if this was, the <br />suggestion by Mr. Iwashita was made a condition of the rezoning, we would have to submit <br />calculations of the proposed use for the prior owner, and how would we do that? It would be <br />impossible for us to do. <br />HAYASHI: Mr. Chair? <br /> EXHIBIT A 10 <br /> <br />