My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-01-05 tginger
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-01-05 tginger
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 8:43:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 8:42:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM: Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Thank you. I’m wondering in terms of the timeline and everything else, if <br />this motion of Commissioner Galdones fails and if somebody were to make a motion, for <br />example, to delay Commission action until a TIAR can be presented to us, how would that affect <br />the timeline of this application? <br />HAYASHI: If I may respond. Based on the Code requirement, once the application is <br />filed with the Planning Commission you have 90 days in which to make a recommendation and <br />forward that recommendation to the County Council, except that if agreed to by the applicant <br />then it can be extended. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Hayashi. Commissioner Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I don’t know if this appropriate but I wanted to just <br />ask that when the TIAR is conducted that it is conducted during school because of that Waiakea <br />Elementary and Intermediate School, it’s the whole artery there, that’s the issue, I think, and then <br />during peak hours. Is that an appropriate request? <br />YUEN: I wouldn’t put it in. These are the kinds of things that the DOT looks at; <br />and sometimes I have seen rejection of a TIAR because it was not done in an appropriate <br />timeframe. So rather than we trying to sit here and spell out the parameters this is what they <br />need, they need to make sure that it’s done in the right way, and I wouldn’t get into that level of <br />detail. Just to follow-up, when is the 90 days? I’m sorry, when is the -?. <br />HAYASHI: It was filed actually today with the Planning Commission. <br />YUEN: Oh, I’m sorry, right. The Planning Commission has 90 days. <br />HAYASHI: Yes, they have 90 days from today. <br />GRAHAM: I’d like to ask Mr. Torigoe a question, just procedurally. So before we <br />take this vote, I mean, we have a current motion on the floor, we’re about ready to take a vote. <br />The application before us is not finished once we take the vote, so that someone else can come <br />up with another motion, maybe incorporating the suggestion made by the applicant. And if that <br />fails, maybe we can make a motion to continue until something is done and see if the applicant <br />agrees. Otherwise, if we don’t pass anything it just automatically continues to the next hearing. <br />Is that all right, or do you have any direction as to how we are procedurally to go forward? <br />TORIGOE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. That’s basically correct, that if you cannot get <br />five votes to do anything in particular today then it just goes on for another, until the 90-day <br />period is over or, I guess, the applicant agrees to a longer period for whatever action the <br />Commission proposes, that’s another possibility. The discussion with the TIAR that has been <br />talked about the last couple of minutes I’m not sure how long it would take to get a TIAR and it <br />may not be available in 90 days, so you may want to make sure that the applicant is agreeable to <br />that. The applicant could also say, no, we don’t want to extend the time, you know, and just say <br /> EXHIBIT B 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.