Laserfiche WebLink
Communication Number 2021-14 <br /> judgment "whenever that action is appropriate to accomplish justice." In Re Hana <br /> Ranch Co., 3 Haw.App. 141 , 642 P.2d 938 (1982). However, based on the findings of <br /> facts and conclusion of law set forth above, the Court finds that justice will best be <br /> served by vacating portions of the Third Amended Final Judgment entered August 27, <br /> 2004. <br /> ORDER <br /> 1. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Rule 60(b) Motion to Partially <br /> Vacate Third Amended Final Judgment Dated August 27, 2004 is GRANTED. <br /> 2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rules 60(b)(5) and (6) of the <br /> Hawai'i Rules of Civil Procedure, portions of the Court's Third Amended Final Judgment <br /> dated August 27, 2004, and portions of the Orders incorporated therein, are hereby <br /> vacated, insofar as they relate to Count IV of the Fifth Amended Complaint_' In <br /> The Court hereby vacates the following Orders(including findings of fact,conclusions of law and orders) <br /> all of which deal with land use issues,except that the Court does not vacate these portions of the following Orders <br /> which address whether the County approval of the Members Lodge constituted"spot zoning"(the spot zoning <br /> findings,conclusions and orders are to remain unchanged): <br /> a. "Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re:HRS <br /> Chapter 205 [Count IV in the Fifth Amended Complaint]Filed October 12, 2001," filed April 5, 2002, (as <br /> supplemented by "Order Denying Defendant 1250 Oceanside Partners' Motion for Reconsideration of Order <br /> Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re: HRS Chapter 205 [Count <br /> IV in the Fifth Amended Complaint] Filed October 12, 2001"and"Order Denying Defendant 1250 Oceanside <br /> Partners' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment on Count IV of the Third Amended <br /> Complaint[Count IV of the Fifth Amended Complaint']" filed October 1,2002, <br /> b. "Order Denying Defendant 1250 Oceanside Partners'Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Partial <br /> Summary Judgment on Count IV of the Third Amended Complaint [Count IV of the Fifth Amended Complaint] <br /> Filed October 12,2401," filed April 5,2002. <br /> C. "Order Denying Defendants Christopher Yuen,in his official capacity as the Planning Director for the <br /> County of Hawaii,Dennis Lee in his capacity as the Chief Engineer, County of Hawaii,and County of Hawaii's <br /> Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count IV [Count IV of the Fifth Amended Complaint]Filed October 12,2001; <br /> Order Denying Defendant 1250 Oceanside Partners' Joinder in Defendants Christopher Yuen, in his official capacity <br /> -6- <br />