My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-06 TGARDNER
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-01-06 TGARDNER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 8:45:46 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 8:45:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
we have two sort of applications before us, and one has to precede the other. Could you share a <br />little bit how that works? <br />HAYASHI:Yes. You should vote on the State Land Use Boundary Amendment <br />request first, and then depends on what happens to that -. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Okay, fellow Commissioners, whats your pleasure? <br />Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:I would like to make a motion once the applicants representative steps <br />down. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. No further questions for our applicant? All right, thank you. You <br />may sit down. This recommendation does come with the Departments actually unfavorable <br />recommendationbeforeus.CommissionerSiracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:ImovethatanunfavorablerecommendationbeforwardedtotheCounty <br />Council on the application for a State Land Use Boundary Amendment, Docket No. SLU <br />05-006, based on the Planning Directors recommendation. <br />ALAMEDA:Theres a motion made by Commissioner Siracusa, is there a second? <br />GRAHAM:Second. <br />ALAMEDA:Seconded by Commissioner Graham. Discussion? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Chairman? <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Galdones. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Question of Norman. On the recommendation <br />for the State Land Use Boundary Amendment application, on page 2 it mentions the Hawaii <br />Land Use Commission Rules and mentions that it does not meet the following standards. Could <br />you elaborate on that, the two bullet points. <br />HAYASHI:Well, basically, what it states is, that first bullet states that it should be <br />contiguous to existing urban designated areas. In this particular case, the property is not adjacent <br />to any existing urban designated areas. <br />And the second bullet basically talks about not to have the so-called urban designation all over <br />the place, so, in other words, to spot it from one location to the other, to another location. So <br />basically we felt that in this, at this particular time the reclassification of the property to an urban <br />district would not be consistent with that criteria as established by the State Land Use Law. <br />GALDONES:So its just the location that does not meet these two bullet points that you <br />mentioned? <br />21EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.