Laserfiche WebLink
And I know that this other matter is not before you right now because they haven€t actually filed <br />any of their paperwork yet to the best of our knowledge. But we€re fighting the fight on the <br />other side. Right now as we speak the grading is taking place on Iolani Street for the proposed <br />warehouse which also isn€t in the General Plan. And that zoning request hasn€t yet hit you; but <br />it€s coming. So I appreciate the fact that you see that we€re in the middle of a box and that we <br />are slowly being boxed in and, effectively, forced out. <br />But when it comes to our neighborhood, we€ve been there a long time. We like it there. We like <br />walking where we€re going. It€s convenient, it€s familiar. It€s home. And I€d really like to stay. <br />And when you say that the next two lots that are probably going to come up, when your remarks <br />about, oh, then it€ll be this one and it will be that one, it will be that one - Well, let me tell you, it <br />won€t be any of my three. Okay? Those will stay green. I€m done. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you, Ms. Black. Any questions, Commissioners? Thank you. You <br />maybeseated. <br />BLACK:Thanks. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr.Fuke,youcanreturntothetable.Anyotherfollow-upcomments? <br />FUKE:No,notreally.Youknow,asMs.Blackhadindicated,atthelastmeeting <br />we, you know, she had raised essentially the same concerns; and at that time we tried to address <br />them through the various conditions that the Director is now suggesting, to which the applicant is <br />also receptive to. <br />So the only addition, of course, is like, you know, kind of following up with what Commissioner <br />Iwashita was asking about added participation ƒ is that, you know, I kind of like drafted <br />something up not knowing that there was going to be a revised condition. But, you know, there <br />could conceivably be like a condition that would say something like Further, prior to submittal <br />of plans for plan approval for any new structure on the subject property, the applicant shall <br />confer with owners or occupants of all adjoining single family residential zoned lots.‚ And, <br />again, you know, this is to give the adjoining property owners like Ms. Black an opportunity to <br />comment on the proposed plan. And the Planning Director does have the approval through the <br />plan approval process to require additional setbacks, additional design or, you know, related type <br />of mitigative conditions. So I think this provides an opportunity for the neighbors to get involved <br />in the design aspect; and provided that you can convince the Planning Director that the suggested <br />mitigations are reasonable, then I think they can be accommodated. <br />The only other comment I had to the staff€s amended recommendation is that under Condition C, <br />you know, it says like setback requirements for the RS district,‚ I would like to suggest that it be <br />RS-10 district. Because within the single family residential zone, you know, your setback <br />requirements vary whether your property is RS-7.5 or RS-20 zone. You know, so I think what <br />we€re trying to achieve here is that the landowner would be given no additional rights over and <br />beyond what the current setback and height requirements are, which is an RS-10 zone. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Director Yuen? <br />11EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />