My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-06 TCORAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-01-06 TCORAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 8:51:03 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 8:51:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DARROW: Correct. <br />DOMINGO: Okay. <br />DARROW: I stand corrected. There was an amendment to the existing permit to allow co- <br />location of eight panel antennas; and I don’t recall who was the applicant. But, obviously, this <br />was for co-location. At that particular time we asked that the applicants come back to the <br />Planning Commission for amendments for co-location. But in this particular, you know, we’re <br />trying to encourage that.So at this point as long as they’re within the parameters of the <br />approved tower height, we’re allowing co-location to be part of the approval. So they just have <br />to go through, they were required previously to go through plan approval. But if it’s just a <br />simple co-location then even plan approval is not necessarily required. <br />DOMINGO: I see. Would these two existing towers and the proposed tower be within the <br />parameters of the heiau, or would it be outside? <br />DARROW: Theyare approximately 150 feet away. <br />DOMINGO: I see. <br />DARROW: We did receive a no-effect letter from Department of Land and Natural Resources, <br />State Historic Preservation Division, stating that they feel that these towers will not have an <br />effect on these historic properties. <br />DOMINGO: Might be the engineers from Castle (sic) can answer this question. How many <br />panels would be required ordinarily for a user, be used on a pole for their purposes? How many <br />panels are required? <br />DARROW: We have another applicant -. <br />DOMINGO: Oh, sure. <br />DARROW: Okay, thank you. <br />DOMINGO: I’m sorry. <br />DARROW: Thank you. <br />FOX: Good morning. <br />KERN: Good morning. Please raise your right hand. I’ll swear you in before you begin. Do <br />you affirm/swear to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? <br />YOUNG: Yes, I do. <br />KERN: All right. And name and address and -? <br />YOUNG: My name is Carl Young. I live at 1130 Hind Iyuka Drive in Honolulu, Hawai‘i <br />96821. To answer the question about the number of antennas, it depends on the application, the <br />applicant, and what they’re trying to achieve, based on their network design. So it would be <br />omni antennas, it could be three, which was the original application, I believe, for Nexel. And <br />they were replaced I believe with three panel antennas. Some people like to use six or <br />sometimes nine, and upward up to 12. And sometimes due to microwave dishes -. It depends on <br />what they’re trying to achieve there. So it’s an engineering decision. <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.