Laserfiche WebLink
District. Subsequently the Planning Director initiated procedures to require a Use Permit in the <br />County’s Agricultural zoned district. That includes RA, FA, IA, as well as Agricultural zoned <br />districts. So that, you know, when these towers come in,it still requires a public hearing. So this <br />is our first application in which Ordinance 1017 is applicable to, as well as our next application, <br />so I won’t go into detail about that for our next one. <br />The reasons for the request is that the current existing telecommunication facility requires an <br />upgrade to improve coverage between existing tower sites, and the replacement of a wood pole <br />with the steel pole will provide a stronger more storm-resistant installation. <br />This is a site plan submitted by the applicant. This shows the property. The north is on the top <br />right of the map, and then it shows the area of the tower sites. There’s actually four towers <br />currently located there, three of which have been permitted through special permits. This <br />particular tower, the existing tower, was, had been built prior to 19 -, when it required the special <br />permit through the State Supreme Court. This shows a bird’s-eye view. You can see that there <br />will be 12 panel antennas along the top of the tower. The remaining four for Sprint are located <br />just below that on the tower. <br />The Planning Director is recommending approval of this application. With that, that concludes <br />our presentation. Are there any questions? <br />KERN: Any questions for staff? <br />DARROW: I do have one -. We did receive a letter this morning of support. And that has been, <br />we only have one copy, and that has been passed out to the Commissioners. Thank you. <br />KERN: All right, any questions? <br />ONO: Yes. <br />KERN: Commissioner Ono. <br />ONO: Question on how old, you didn’t finish the year that the wooden pole was constructed. <br />DARROW: Prior to 1999, the Planning Department interpreted State law and, to allow <br />telecommunication towers as a permitted use, as well as within the County Agricultural district. <br />There was an appeal to that decision to the Supreme Court in which the Supreme Court <br />overturned that and stated that this required a special permit for telecommunication towers <br />within the State Land Use Agricultural district. So from 1999 until 2007 any tower that had <br />come in within the State Land Use Agricultural district went through the special permit process. <br />In 2007, the State Legislature enacted 171 which allowed them to be permitted uses within the <br />State Land Use Agricultural District. And, again, because of a controversy that surrounds some <br />of these towers with surrounding properties, the Planning Director initiated procedures to still <br />require a use permit in the County zoning sothat it can still come before Planning Commission <br />and public hearing. <br />ONO: No, I guess I’m alluding to the, whether the wooden pole needed to be replaced then <br />therefore it would be more worthwhile to put up a, the steel pole -. But I was just wondering <br />how old was the wooden pole that it needed to be replaced. <br />DARROW: Well, it was constructed in 1997. <br />ONO: Thank you. <br />2 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />