My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-01-08 THERNANDEZ
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-01-08 THERNANDEZ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:05:11 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:05:09 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HERNANDEZ: No. <br />WOODWARD: Very good, okay. We’ve taken care of all of that. Do we have a motion? <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Commissioner Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. In regard to Item No. 1 agenda, Connie and Marcel <br />Hernandez, SPP 09-89 special permit to allow the establishment of a naturopathic retreat center <br />which would include overnight guests, seminars, individual consultations, massage therapy, <br />acupuncture, and educational tours on 3.111 acres of land, etc., I move that the application be <br />approved together with the conditions previously set forth on the record. <br />KERN: Second. <br />WOODWARD: Any discussion? Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think I’d like to be satisfied for myself and in respect <br />to the Planning Director’s recommendation for denial and in deference to her action -. I would <br />just like to mention that one issue that we need to really settle in our minds is whether in fact the <br />request is in conflict with the General Plan; and if we should approve this special permit what it <br />would entail and what would be involved with us in future applications of similar uses. Now, <br />you know, I respect the recommendation, I respect the Planning Director. And I must say that, <br />as I look at this application and as I review others which have come before us in which we have <br />made some modifications with regards to the recommendations of the Planning Director, we had <br />gone contrary to what she was recommending. This, too, I would like to just mention that, you <br />know, certainly it does not conform to the requirements of the General Plan with regards to <br />commercial uses and its types, and in actuality where it would be best suited for; and as stated in <br />this recommendation that, you know, it should be, it would be more appropriate if it was located <br />in the Honokaa town area. And I think this is a primary negative factor to which our denial <br />should be based on. <br />And I just would like to mention that, again, you know, we are looking at a special permit <br />application. And all those lands along Kapulena although they, most of the lands in Kapulena, <br />although they have urban type of uses with respect to residential homes being situated near each <br />other -. The so-called main downtown area of Kapulena is where this place is situated. I live <br />across the gulch further down. And there also is another so-called, at that time plantation used to <br />situate their homes in different areas, and they were called camps; and I lived there. And I <br />bought a portion of property adjacent to one of these camps and, therefore, my property is more <br />than an acre and a half. And it’s beyond, it’s beyond the boundary of 500 feet where residents <br />affected by an application should be notified. That’s why I haven’t heard anything about it from <br />the very beginning. And I’m not taking offense to it because it was done in compliance with the <br />requirements and the laws as set forth in the General Plan. <br />19 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.