Laserfiche WebLink
IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. There’s this letter of concern about Kamaee Road. Do you <br />have any input on that? <br />MIKKELSON: Yes, I do. I do. That, again, is associated with the neighboring endeavor. They <br />had the World Botanical Gardens; and since the zipline is an approved use, they decided to put <br />one in as well. And theirs is up and running. Ours is not yet. <br />And the traffic concerns are on-going concerns. They are parking on the road from what I <br />understand. I’ve had some people who have called me asked me about it and wondered if it was <br />associated with us. We have ample parking off-road, so it’ll never be that issue. <br />IWASHITA: Can you just sort of show me what the relationship is? Cause I have a, I’m <br />looking at the map and I’m having a hard time figuring it out. <br />DARROW: Unfortunately, I apologize for the darkness of the map. We’ll try to see if we can <br />help that -. The subject property is in this area. It’s my understanding that Kamaee Road goes <br />out to the north, on the property to the north and then travels on up. Is that correct? <br />MIKKELSON: Yes. <br />DARROW: Yeah, and so the road that the person is speaking to is actually on an adjacent parcel <br />to the south. <br />MIKKELSON: If I could since it’s so large, while the map is up and the lights are out? <br />WOODWARD: Sure. <br />MIKKELSON: If you look at the map and you see a little finger of land sticking down from the <br />bottom to the Mamalahoa Highway, that is the affected portion for the special permit. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, thank you. One other question I might have while we have you here, I <br />know that you submitted a letter asking for revision or elimination of certain conditions; and I <br />believe the Planning Director has given that, her response to Jeff. Did you want to go over what <br />the potential revisions for the conditions would be? <br />th <br />DARROW: Sure. In looking at Mr. Carlile’s letter submitted January 4 or dated January 4, <br />2010, page 2, he has some concerns regarding certain conditions. The second paragraph he <br />addresses Condition No. 6. If we look at our conditions, I believe that is the condition that limits <br />the amount of people per day on the property. It has a maximum total of 80 visitors per day. We <br />are, the Planning Director is recommending that instead of having it on a daily, a limit on the <br />daily amount that we use the amount that we use for a yearly amount which is 30,000 visitors. <br />The 80 amount is 365 divided by 30,000. So we come up with that figure. But in this, <br />Mr. Carlile’s concern is that on certain days he may have more visitors than that, on other days <br />he’ll have less. So he wanted to ask that it just be the yearly figure which would be 30,000. So <br />we would, the Planning Director would be agreeable to changing that to allow 30,000 visitors per <br />year maximum total. <br />5 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />