My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-01-08 TCOUNTY
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-01-08 TCOUNTY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 9:05:24 AM
Creation date
6/13/2011 9:05:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
subject to whatever. Wherever that line ends up being, we’re subject to the rules as applies to <br />that line. <br />IWASHITA: I guess, even though I said it was the last thing it’s not. I notice on your <br />demolition map that the banyan out on the Hamakua side of the beach, or one of them, the largest <br />one actually out there between the two is not being demolished. And I guess giving the rationale <br />I heard earlier from Mr. Darrow I don’t understand why that is. <br />KOMATA: Well, I believe, I know -. Leonard, can you come up and discuss that? My <br />recollection is that there was particular interest in that one banyan tree. There was, when we met <br />at the site with a group of about 8 or 10 people that was their priority tree. That’s the one that <br />they wanted saved. And so I think we acquiesced at first or, that was shown in the plan and we <br />gave in and said we agree to keep that tree there as a part of this plan; but in the future if once <br />our other trees start taking place, then we would look at maybe replacing that down the line. Is <br />that correct, Leonard? <br />BISEL: That’s correct, yes. <br />IWASHITA: So you would have to, would that, that would be, if you later on need to demo that <br />tree that would just be a minor SMA kind of a thing? You wouldn’t have to come back to us? <br />BISEL: Yeah, I believe it would be a minor action. <br />IWASHITA: Does that sound correct, counsel? <br />GONZALEZ: What is the question? <br />IWASHITA: I’m sorry, the demolition of the banyan tree that is not being, approval is not being <br />sought for in this application, it’s just one tree that would be a minor SMA administrative <br />matter? <br />GONZALEZ: I don’t know. You’d have to ask the Director. <br />MASUNAGA: Yeah, I think you’re right on that. <br />IWASHITA: Okay, thank you. <br />WOODWARD: All right, Commissioner Domingo, you had a question? No? <br />DOMINGO: I’d just like to mention this -. You know, I’m torn apart from what I’ve seen in the <br />plan and from what has been said by the public, Parks and Recreation, and from what I’m <br />hearing from the public. It seems like P&R is just satisfied that everything has been addressed <br />and that it’s ready to go, yeah. And what I’m hearing from the public, he said, hey, everything is <br />not being addressed here, we need some, maybe some clarification or some assurances and <br />perhaps there might not be an understanding from the part of the public with regards to what, <br />what’s here actually in the plan. So, you know, I don’t know, I’m not ready to vote on this and <br /> 26 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.